ML12107A066: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 13: Line 13:
| document type = E-Mail
| document type = E-Mail
| page count = 3
| page count = 3
| project = TAC:ME8135, TAC:ME8136
| project = TAC:ME8136, TAC:ME8135
| stage = Other
| stage = Other
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Saba, FaridehSent:Thursday, April 12, 2012 12:00 PMTo:Murray, William R. (Bill)Cc:Billoch, Araceli; Lingam, SivaSubject:Acceptance review for TACs ME8135/6, Addition of Analytical Methodology TR to TS 5.6.5 and Revision to TS 2.1.1.2 Bill,  Per LIC-109, the NRC staff completed acceptance review of Carolina Power & Light Company request dated March 6, 2012, for review and approval of "Addition of Analytical Methodology Topical Report to Technical Specification 5.6.5, "CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT (COLR)" and Revision to Technical Specification 2.1.1.2 Minimum Critical Power Ratio Safety Limit," for Brunswick Units 1 and 2. The NRC staff finds this amendment request to be acceptable for review in that the submittal reasonably appears to contain sufficient technical information, both in scope and depth, for the NRC staff to perform the detailed technical review and render, in an appropriate time frame, an assessment of the requested action.  
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Saba, FaridehSent:Thursday, April 12, 2012 12:00 PMTo:Murray, William R. (Bill)Cc:Billoch, Araceli; Lingam, Siva
 
==Subject:==
Acceptance review for TACs ME8135/6, Addition of Analytical Methodology TR to TS 5.6.5 and Revision to TS 2.1.1.2 Bill,  Per LIC-109, the NRC staff completed acceptance review of Carolina Power & Light Company request dated March 6, 2012, for review and approval of "Addition of Analytical Methodology Topical Report to Technical Specification 5.6.5, "CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT (COLR)" and Revision to Technical Specification 2.1.1.2 Minimum Critical Power Ratio Safety Limit," for Brunswick Units 1 and 2. The NRC staff finds this amendment request to be acceptable for review in that the submittal reasonably appears to contain sufficient technical information, both in scope and depth, for the NRC staff to perform the detailed technical review and render, in an appropriate time frame, an assessment of the requested action.  


The detailed review may result in some questions that will need to be addressed informally or formally prior to the completion of the staff's final review of the amendment request. Thanks,  
The detailed review may result in some questions that will need to be addressed informally or formally prior to the completion of the staff's final review of the amendment request. Thanks,  

Revision as of 14:55, 5 April 2018

2012/04/12 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review for TACs ME8135/6, Addition of Analytical Methodology TR to TS 5.6.5 and Revision to TS 2.1.1.2
ML12107A066
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/12/2012
From: Saba F E
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
To: Murray W R
Progress Energy Co
References
TAC ME8135, TAC ME8136
Download: ML12107A066 (3)
v • d • e


Text

1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Saba, FaridehSent:Thursday, April 12, 2012 12:00 PMTo:Murray, William R. (Bill)Cc:Billoch, Araceli; Lingam, Siva

Subject:

Acceptance review for TACs ME8135/6, Addition of Analytical Methodology TR to TS 5.6.5 and Revision to TS 2.1.1.2 Bill, Per LIC-109, the NRC staff completed acceptance review of Carolina Power & Light Company request dated March 6, 2012, for review and approval of "Addition of Analytical Methodology Topical Report to Technical Specification 5.6.5, "CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT (COLR)" and Revision to Technical Specification 2.1.1.2 Minimum Critical Power Ratio Safety Limit," for Brunswick Units 1 and 2. The NRC staff finds this amendment request to be acceptable for review in that the submittal reasonably appears to contain sufficient technical information, both in scope and depth, for the NRC staff to perform the detailed technical review and render, in an appropriate time frame, an assessment of the requested action.

The detailed review may result in some questions that will need to be addressed informally or formally prior to the completion of the staff's final review of the amendment request. Thanks,

Farideh E. Saba, P.E.

Senior Project Manager NRC/ADRO/NRR/DORL 301-415-1447 Mail Stop O-8G9A Farideh.Saba@NRC.GOV Tracking:

2RecipientReadMurray, William R. (Bill)Billoch, AraceliRead: 4/12/2012 12:50 PM Lingam, Siva Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 326 Mail Envelope Properties (Farideh.Saba@nrc.gov20120412115900)

Subject:

Acceptance review for TACs ME8135/6, Addition of Analytical Methodology TR to TS 5.6.5 and Revision to TS 2.1.1.2 Sent Date: 4/12/2012 11:59:30 AM Received Date: 4/12/2012 11:59:00 AM From: Saba, Farideh Created By: Farideh.Saba@nrc.gov Recipients: "Billoch, Araceli" <Araceli.Billoch@nrc.gov> Tracking Status:: Response: Read : 4/12/2012 12:50:00 PM "Lingam, Siva" <Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Murray, William R. (Bill)" <Bill.Murray2@pgnmail.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1112 4/12/2012 11:59:00 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: Yes Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12107A066&oldid=575289"