|
|
| Line 13: |
Line 13: |
| | document type = E-Mail | | | document type = E-Mail |
| | page count = 2 | | | page count = 2 |
| | project = TAC:MF5215, TAC:MF5216, TAC:MF5217 | | | project = TAC:MF5216, TAC:MF5215, TAC:MF5217 |
| | stage = Acceptance Review | | | stage = Acceptance Review |
| }} | | }} |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Wengert, ThomasSent:Wednesday, December 17, 2014 2:02 PMTo:andrea.sterdis@sce.comCc:mark.morgan@sce.com; John.Brabec@sce.com; Broaddus, Doug; Kavanagh, Kerri; Keim, Andrea; Vaaler, Marlayna; Watson, BruceSubject:SONGS Units 1, 2 and 3 - Acceptance Review of Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program (TAC Nos. MF5215, MF5216, and MF5217)By letter dated November 13, 2014 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML14322A157), Southern California Edison (SCE) submitted a proposed revision to the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Quality Assurance Program (QAP) for review and approval by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), since it involves aspects that are considered reductions in commitments. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the NRC staff's acceptance review of the submittal. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | | {{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Wengert, ThomasSent:Wednesday, December 17, 2014 2:02 PMTo:andrea.sterdis@sce.comCc:mark.morgan@sce.com; John.Brabec@sce.com; Broaddus, Doug; Kavanagh, Kerri; Keim, Andrea; Vaaler, Marlayna; Watson, Bruce |
| | |
| | ==Subject:== |
| | SONGS Units 1, 2 and 3 - Acceptance Review of Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program (TAC Nos. MF5215, MF5216, and MF5217)By letter dated November 13, 2014 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML14322A157), Southern California Edison (SCE) submitted a proposed revision to the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Quality Assurance Program (QAP) for review and approval by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), since it involves aspects that are considered reductions in commitments. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the NRC staff's acceptance review of the submittal. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. |
| The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of this request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | | The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of this request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. |
| Note that, because the NRC staff has accepted this application for review and will be performing a detailed review of this request, the 60-day period referenced in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.54(a)(4)(iv) is not applicable. Accordingly, SCE can implement reductions in commitments only after the NRC staff has completed its review and issued a safety evaluation. | | Note that, because the NRC staff has accepted this application for review and will be performing a detailed review of this request, the 60-day period referenced in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.54(a)(4)(iv) is not applicable. Accordingly, SCE can implement reductions in commitments only after the NRC staff has completed its review and issued a safety evaluation. |
Revision as of 06:33, 5 April 2018
Letter Sequence Acceptance Review |
|---|
|
|
MONTHYEARML14322A1572014-11-13013 November 2014
Independent Spent Fuel Storage Facility - Request for Approval of Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program
Project stage: Request
ML14352A0162014-12-17017 December 2014
NRR E-mail Capture - SONGS Units 1, 2 and 3 - Acceptance Review of Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program
Project stage: Acceptance Review
ML14357A2952015-01-12012 January 2015
Independent Spent Fuel Storage Facility - Acceptance Review of Decommission Quality Assurance Program
Project stage: Acceptance Review
ML15083A4552015-03-27027 March 2015
and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - Request for Additional Information Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program Review
Project stage: RAI
ML15112A0792015-04-20020 April 2015
Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, Response to a Request for Additional Information Regarding Decommissioning Quality Assurance Plan
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML15112A0802015-04-20020 April 2015
Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program, Revision 0
Project stage: Request
ML15191A4612015-08-10010 August 2015
the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - Review of Changes to the Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program (TAC Nos, MF5215, Mf 5216, and Mf 5217)
Project stage: Approval
ML17223A1962017-08-0909 August 2017
ISFSI - Decommissioning Quality Assurance Plan
Project stage: Other
2015-03-27
[Table View] |
|
|---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML24017A2432024-01-15015 January 2024
LTR-24-0008 Paul Blanch, E-mails Request for Formal Response to Requests for Meeting to Discuss Safety Issues with NRC Staff
ML22348A0322022-11-30030 November 2022
NRR E-mail Capture - Request to Resume Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation for Decommissioning of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3
ML22348A0532022-11-30030 November 2022
NRC to National Marine Fisheries Service (Nmfs), Request to Resume Endangered Species Act Consultation for Decommissioning of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3
ML22278A0182022-10-0404 October 2022
(SONGS) Unit 2 Reactor Head and Closure of Commitments Related to Peaceful Use of Foreign Technology- Acknowledge Receipt
ML22265A2122022-09-22022 September 2022
Request for Additional Information for Exemption Request from 100m 72.106(B) Requirement, Docket Nos 50-206, 50-361, and 50-362
ML22119A2422022-04-29029 April 2022
Riv FOLLOW-UP Response: Question About April 11 San Onofre Event
ML22034A9962022-02-0202 February 2022
S. Morris Response to C. Langley-Questions About Moving Snf at San Onfre
ML21280A1022021-12-0606 December 2021
NRC to NMFS, Supplement to Request to Reinitiate Endangered Species Act Consultation for San Onofre Decommissioning
ML21277A2342021-09-30030 September 2021
NMFS to NRC, Receipt of Request to Reinitiate Endangered Species Act Consultation for San Onofre Decommissioning
ML21242A0602021-09-30030 September 2021
NRC to NMFS, Request to Initiate Consultation for SONGS Decommissioning
ML21117A3492021-03-30030 March 2021
March 30, 2021, Email from Public Watchdogs on Providing New Information to Its October 13, 2020, 2.206 Petition
ML21069A2482021-03-10010 March 2021
Umax, 07200054, 05000361, 05000362, FSAR Revision 4 for San Onofre ISFSI
ML21068A2712021-03-0909 March 2021
Request for Additional Information Regarding Biological Opinion - SONGS- EPID L-2021-LLL-0006
ML20343A1292020-12-0808 December 2020
NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information
ML20302A3252020-10-21021 October 2020
E-Mail: Acknowledgement of Receipt to the Petitioner Regarding SCE Use of Hi-Storm at SONGS
ML20233A7342020-08-18018 August 2020
LTR-20-0313 David Victor, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Community Engagement Panel, Chair, Et Al., Letter Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Security at SONGS and Recent SONGS Community Engagement Panel Meeting on O
ML20224A0172020-08-0707 August 2020
8-7-20 Corrected Hearing Time - Intervenor SCEs Acknowledgement of Oral Argument Notice (9th Cir.)(Case No. 20-70899)
ML20224A0182020-08-0707 August 2020
8-7-20 Intervenor SCEs Acknowledgement of Oral Argument Notice (9th Cir.)(Case No. 20-70899)
ML20204B0782020-07-22022 July 2020
Donna Gilmore Email Holtec Umax Materials (07200054, 05000361, 05000362)
ML20198M4522020-07-15015 July 2020
Supplement to Public Watchdogs 2.206 Petition
ML20163A3402020-05-0505 May 2020
Email Transmission - Peaceful Use Commitments State Dept for SONGS Rx Heads and Steam Generators
ML20120A0282020-04-28028 April 2020
4-28-20 Notice of Addition of James Adler as Attorney for NRC (9th Cir.)(Case No. 20-70899)
ML20076A5742020-03-11011 March 2020
Response to A.Mcnally San Onofre Canisters (LTR-20-0003)
ML20062F5762020-02-28028 February 2020
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - NRC E-mail to Petitioner Regarding Petition Screening Results February 28, 2020
ML20063M3092020-02-28028 February 2020
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - Response from Petitioner to NRC E-mail Regarding Petition Screening Results, February 28, 2020
ML20059M2292020-02-25025 February 2020
OEDO-20-00053 2.206 Petition - Flooding Likely to Create Radioactive Geysers at SONGS
ML20049A0802020-02-14014 February 2020
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - E-mail to Petitioner on Immediate Actions Request Determination February 14, 2020
ML20007E5342020-01-0606 January 2020
Oceansiders Initial Assessment & Public Meeting Response E-Mail
ML20006D7012019-12-23023 December 2019
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition SONGS - Petitioner Request for Public Meeting and NRC Response - December 23, 2019
ML19354B6762019-12-20020 December 2019
2.206 Petition Initial Assessment Notification E-Mail
ML19325C5902019-11-20020 November 2019
2.206 Petition Status Notification Email
ML19326B2392019-11-18018 November 2019
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition SONGS - Screened-in and PRB November 18, 2019
ML19319B6262019-11-0808 November 2019
Oceansiders 2.206 Petition Immediate Action Response E-Mail
ML19326A7122019-10-30030 October 2019
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - SONGS Receipt of Exhibits October 30, 2019
ML19326A9692019-10-25025 October 2019
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - SONGS Immediate Action Determination October 25, 2019
ML19326A3602019-10-23023 October 2019
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - SONGS First E-mail to Petitioner October 23, 2019
ML19284B3232019-10-0808 October 2019
Response LTR-19-0351 Kalene Walker, E-mail Concerns About Critical Safety Problems with Holtec Nuclear Waste Storage System at San Onofre
ML19344C7842019-09-0303 September 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 09-03-2019 RSCS
ML19344C7212019-08-30030 August 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 08-30-2019 J Steinmetz
ML19214A1362019-08-0202 August 2019
Riv Pao Response to Mr. Langley Response to Inquiry
ML19217A1862019-08-0202 August 2019
E-Mail from M. Layton/Nrc to K. Walker/Public San Onofre - SONGS Special Inspection - Damaged Canisters
ML19221B4122019-07-30030 July 2019
Southern California Edison Company, Southern California Nuclear Generating Station, E-mail from Charles Langley to Scott Morris, NRC, Redundant Drop Protection Features at SONGS
ML19210D4292019-07-29029 July 2019
E-Mail from M. Layton/Nrc to D. Gilmore/Public Reply to E-Mail Questions
ML19213A1072019-07-29029 July 2019
Reply to Mr. Langley Re. Redundant Drop Protection Feature at SONGS
ML19210D4342019-07-11011 July 2019
Curtiss-Wright SAS - 10 CFR Part 21 Reporting of Defects for Introl Positioner 890265-010
ML19190A0432019-06-28028 June 2019
Discusses Proprietary Information for Curtiss-Wright SAS - 10 CFR Part 21 Reporting of Defects for Introl Positioner 890265-010 - Cw SAS Initial Report No. 10CFR21-48
ML19165A1102019-06-11011 June 2019
SONGS Webinar (6-3-2019) Message - Sarah Akerson
ML19190A0442019-06-0707 June 2019
10 CFR Part 21 Reporting of Defects for Introl Positioner 890265-010 - Cw SAS Initial Report No. 10CFR21-48
ML19158A4432019-06-0404 June 2019
Southern California Edison Company; Scratches on Nuclear Storage Canisters at San Onofre Pose No Problems, NRC Says After Its Own Analysis - Orange County Register
ML19156A1422019-06-0404 June 2019
LTR-19-0218 Donna Gilmore, Sanonofresafety.Org, E-mail Scratches on Nuclear Storage Canisters at San Onofre
2024-01-15
[Table view] |
Text
1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Wengert, ThomasSent:Wednesday, December 17, 2014 2:02 PMTo:andrea.sterdis@sce.comCc:mark.morgan@sce.com; John.Brabec@sce.com; Broaddus, Doug; Kavanagh, Kerri; Keim, Andrea; Vaaler, Marlayna; Watson, Bruce
Subject:
SONGS Units 1, 2 and 3 - Acceptance Review of Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program (TAC Nos. MF5215, MF5216, and MF5217)By letter dated November 13, 2014 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML14322A157), Southern California Edison (SCE) submitted a proposed revision to the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Quality Assurance Program (QAP) for review and approval by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), since it involves aspects that are considered reductions in commitments. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the NRC staff's acceptance review of the submittal. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of this request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Note that, because the NRC staff has accepted this application for review and will be performing a detailed review of this request, the 60-day period referenced in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.54(a)(4)(iv) is not applicable. Accordingly, SCE can implement reductions in commitments only after the NRC staff has completed its review and issued a safety evaluation.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Tom Wengert Senior Project Manager - San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRR/DORL/LPL4-2 (301) 415-4037
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 1778 Mail Envelope Properties (Thomas.Wengert@nrc.gov20141217140100)
Subject:
SONGS Units 1, 2 and 3 - Acceptance Review of Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program (TAC Nos. MF5215, MF5216, and MF5217) Sent Date: 12/17/2014 2:01:31 PM Received Date: 12/17/2014 2:01:00 PM From: Wengert, Thomas Created By: Thomas.Wengert@nrc.gov Recipients: "mark.morgan@sce.com" <mark.morgan@sce.com> Tracking Status: None "John.Brabec@sce.com" <John.Brabec@sce.com> Tracking Status: None "Broaddus, Doug" <Doug.Broaddus@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Kavanagh, Kerri" <Kerri.Kavanagh@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Keim, Andrea" <Andrea.Keim@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Vaaler, Marlayna" <Marlayna.Vaaler@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Watson, Bruce" <Bruce.Watson@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "andrea.sterdis@sce.com" <andrea.sterdis@sce.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2296 12/17/2014 2:01:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:
