ML20127E826: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML20127E826
| number = ML20127E826
| issue date = 10/14/1970
| issue date = 10/14/1970
| title = Ack Receipt of 700925 Ltr Re Noncompliance Noted in Insp on 700909.Corrective Actions:Samples Collected Weekly from Primary Cooling Sys for Analysis & New Procedure Written for Generator Check
| title = Ack Receipt of Re Noncompliance Noted in Insp on 700909.Corrective Actions:Samples Collected Weekly from Primary Cooling Sys for Analysis & New Procedure Written for Generator Check
| author name = Ormsby R
| author name = Ormsby R
| author affiliation = LOCKHEED AIRCRAFT CORP.
| author affiliation = LOCKHEED AIRCRAFT CORP.
Line 12: Line 12:
| case reference number = FOIA-84-737
| case reference number = FOIA-84-737
| document report number = LGD-301598, NUDOCS 8505200225
| document report number = LGD-301598, NUDOCS 8505200225
| title reference date = 09-25-1970
| package number = ML20127E447
| package number = ML20127E447
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, VENDOR/MANUFACTURER TO NRC
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, VENDOR/MANUFACTURER TO NRC

Latest revision as of 06:09, 22 August 2022

Ack Receipt of Re Noncompliance Noted in Insp on 700909.Corrective Actions:Samples Collected Weekly from Primary Cooling Sys for Analysis & New Procedure Written for Generator Check
ML20127E826
Person / Time
Site: 05000172
Issue date: 10/14/1970
From: Ormsby R
LOCKHEED AIRCRAFT CORP.
To: Jennifer Davis
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML20127E447 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-84-737 LGD-301598, NUDOCS 8505200225
Download: ML20127E826 (4)


Text

, -

)-

I W . . -

-(

.m y [ , ,.. .;;

9{ -

I /

I LocKnEED GEORm.t CO?.;P,t.T t A DeVibsON OF LOCanoCEO as ACoar? COm*OmAT.Oss 9

' MARIETTA. GEoRG A 3co6o I.

i r October 14, 1970 i

f LGD/301598 1

United 5;ctos Atomic Energy Commission Division of Cornplionce - Re; ion 11 233 Pecchtree Street, N.W.

A Icnic, Gaorgic 30333 i Attention: John G. Devis, Director t

r l'

Subject:

Notice of Noncomplicnce t.

Decr Mr. Dcvis:

t

.i inis will c:know!ecce receipt of your lerier of Septemcer 25, 1970, ccvising Lockheed of the items of concomp,licnce nered curing the AEC inspection at

[ Lockheed Georgio Nuclecr Lchorotory on September 9,1970. Following cre stcrements of Lockheed's position on the various items listed in Peregrcph 5 of the Form AEC-592 cricched to your letter:

3 1

item o - Lockneed cdmits noncomplicnce with ?cregccpn C.2 of rne Technicci L 5pecificctions for 1.icense R-26 in thct the primary cooling system werer acs not been enclyzed for gross c!pnc, borc, scmme cetivity since July 1970, i

t i On October 12, 1970, L::kheed collected semples from the primcry t cooling system for cnclysis for gross ciphc, beto, gemme es recjirc-1 by the Technicci Spec!'ications, and wi!! continue to do so weekly

,c unt.li tne. Tecnn.i:ci .,peciticctions cre chcnged, in pessing, Locku..eec .._.

~ . . .

notes t,n ci :he rec: tor ive,s wcs un.;ocr.cc rom the rccctor en July ..c, , . m ,

o . .

i ene since fact r.cre the recerer fuei has nct :een in conicc: wi:n ic.e pn-mary cooling sys: m. vn ns;6sr i ~,, .i,// , , sckhe.e.,. cdv.isec ine nvis.cn of Recciar Licen,ing that f rther cpare.:Ir.n of the RER is not picnned. In thct le rer Lc:Er.ee:. cdvised tha Civision of Pec: tor Licensing :nct :no .

.. e e . .

rec:for .sel g

.is now storce in :.ne :: crc;2 poo!, tr m wnsen wc:er semp.es cre teing colic:::: ccc cnc!y ed weekly, cnc recpestec cn cppropricte cmendmer; to i:t Tachnicci Specificc:!ons to eclete :he reesirement for

] E periodicciif :ct- c!in ; :. 4 prir.. cry :cs!in; system. Action by the Division of Recc:or *.!: nsing is :.till f.cncing.

1 MA 84 */3'7 PR -

.~. - ,. ;*

..  : , t p' ' '. . ),cO;..2.{. * :' ,h.O >. ,5% 7?g')).l[ d .E. Q ,',.=.(~g*;:;p.',.J.,: g.,.,'

p

-=,:. s. f_.

[. . ,

.. _;. :c y ,

.- y .... .

.-.,7.~ r. y- .

q: - .

I r

L Letter to United States Atomic Energy Commission, dated 14 Oc:ober 1970,

Subject:

4 ,

Notice of Noncompli nce, LGD/301598 o

L l tem b - Lockheed takes exception to the statement that there wcs a violation of that portion of Porogrcph E.2.c which reads "...the systems utilized in

'{y automatic operation of the generator ore routinely checked..." In our

t. .

letter of April 13, 1970, to your office we responded to a previous

! notice of noncomplicnce es follows: " Henceforth, the reactor will not

'. be oper ted unless the diesel generater cutomatic systems have been -

j functionally checked wi:hin the preceding three months.

h "A new procedure h s been written to cover the functional check cr.: o req irement to compiere the procedure cu rteriy has beer, oc.ded to rne pc-C riedic check sheer posted in the rec::or control room."

! The recent inspection, on September 9,1970, was within the o,ucrier:y i inspection period provided in :he new pcceedure. Although the recctor will not be opercted cgcin, the diesel genercrcr cutomctic systems will l

[ continue to be checkcd at lasst cuarterly in accordance with procedures until such a tire.e es the Technicci Specifications are changed. The

[

! outomatic systems were checked escin on October 13, 1970.

O Lockheed cemits noncomplicnce with that portion of Paragrcph E.2.c of

) ,

  • he Technical Specifico:15ns for License R-86 which reevires thet ". . .the h

diesel genercior is sicrted on a weekly : sis." A: the time of the inspec-tion, September 9, the gener: tor hed not been started since August 28.

Since the inspectien,tne diesel generator has been started on September 10, 14, 21, and 25,1970, cnd wili he started weekly until such c time es the j

Technical Specificctions are ch=nced.

a 0

t in its letter of August 14, 1970, Lockr. ed advised the Division of Re:ctor i Lic. ming of its discontinuance of opcicti<,n ni :n<: P.fi', cr.c rr; w.<e.

. n.m;:. in i h. la R ... 'u i. .i! :,3 n . iii. .it i.,w. wI,i..;. u..o l.i i eiic..: i n .e . r .o r . .,..

{ in emplia:.is tion "opma:ior.al" so:u:y to sr tury in the " shutdown" conds.uc-O

( tion. Action by it e Division of Rr.=ctor Licensing is still pending.

[ .

Item c - Lockheed !=kes exceotion to the AEC's cor.tention th=t Lc:kheed is ir.

violo: ion of Tchle No. 4 of the .'.ER Technic =l Specific =:'ons es noted in I :ne AEC letter. On T:bie Nc. 4, ha :.vc cc!vmes cn the left of the T

Tacle -- desinn=ted "Cher.nels Provide: .. .

?:.t" -- list

. . - ci!

. .:he recc:ct.

instrumentetian en=n .eis ur. ice. cre eve:i::.c :cr tr.e ir.c:corec mo:.e (i.e., the first column !!s s clI re:: tor instrument channels which cre cvcilable for normc! cperction; en :he secor.6 co!vmn iists cy recetor s.

o.;.t/ *?..OF u t. ... ..,:... 4. v .

3.,.0 ..

e ,. ,. ,

~'

L., * , n , ,,. r. g yy x.n *,. g u . ,., g. * .e. . ., % . J e .- .t s . y,.

m7:;-m y ya-l pt . ...:... .. .e ;. . . - .m -...,. - . -r -m , n.-~ m. ; .

..e.

v . .7 .. .

p

( ..

o I tc.:ter to United 5:ctes Atcmic Energy Commission, dettd Oct2ber 14,1970, Subicet:

1 iOL _ ,

Notice of Noncompliance, LGD/201598

(

b instrument chonnels which are available for the reactor shutdown mode),

{ There is no statement of instrumentation available for the reactor in its p

present configuration, ncmely, " reactor discssembled mode," nor is there a " minimum instrumentation" requirement for that mode. Ifthe

{(

g AEC centends that " Channels Provided For" means minimum instrumento-L tion, then Lockheed hos been in noncomplicnce with these requirements throughout most of its licensed operation. t.ockheed contends that only -

the three columns on the right side of tne tchle -- designored " Minimum f Instrumentorion" -- comprise the only minimum instrumentation recuire-l 3 ments ,

i t

" Although the primcry cooling system is now inoperchie end pcrticlly

' discssembled -- o condi: ion which is cuthorized in the cpproveo core unlooding procedures -- Lockheed, on Oc cher 12, 1970, plcced the following instrurr.entation back into operation: Primcry cooient flow

[ Instrumentction; primcry coolont temperature instrumentcticn; bypcss l

cemineralizer ins cumentction; cnd pool demineralizer instrumentction.

g This instrumentcrion will ce kep in operation until such c time es tne ._

5 Technical Specificctions cre chenged.

1 in its letter of August 14, 1970, Lockheed covised the Division of Reacter Licensing of its discontinucnce of operation of the RER, and recuested on omendment to the RER Technice! Specificerions to reflect instrumentotion recuirements in the pre-decommissioning phase.

Action by the Division of Recciar Licensing is still pending.

Item d - Lockheed cdmits noncomplicnce with Peregrcph L.l .c of the Technical Specificctions for License R-80 in ther c Recetor Sciety Committee wcs no maintained and the Recctor Sciety Ccmmittee fciled to meet et leest m rterly .

An organi:ctioncl change witnin Lcekheec-Georgio Company deleted most '

of the positions specified es I,ecctor Sciety Committee members, cnd lockheed did not ccvise the AEC of this change in c timely manner. We wish to point out, however, inct curing the period the roccior wcs opere-tionci -- i .e., prior to July 29, 1970, when the reacter core wcs un! ceded for the lost time - tne Recercr Sciety Committee members whose tities hoc been deleted by the crgani:c: ion cnonges - or their cpproved cliecncres -

were still evolichle to meet es a cc r.mittee if required. Furtnermore, operction of the f.ER wcs discontinued one the core wcs unlocded for the

!:s; time before the Recciar Scfety Commit:ee meeting dcte become delinquent .

y

.:. : n. :s: ,* 4 ,

, s1

. ; , F. ~ ;~. p,%,

r, .= A .p.* . . . . . ..

9 g , - % '. . . .* + : .y : r.~ :*. w .? :nt ' ;. .a .d. : , "-

<. u, i-- .. - u . - .r- - - -

Q.. ,9 .m v~ ;.;. . y :;

.~. --r-~ 3,-~ ~ - , z- .. . y7-.,

t e. , .. ,

F~ ' .

9 '%, ~

~

L Let:cr ta United States Atomic Entrey Commissi n, dated Octakr 14, 1970, Subirct:

f Natice to Noncompliance, LGD/301598 l

tt. .-

[" The Reactor Safety Committee met again on October 12, 1970, and will

, continue to meet in cecordance with the Technical Specifications until

{ such a time os the Technical Specifications are changed.

.i

! Lockheed has requested the Division of Reactor Licensing to cmend the l Technical Specifications for License R-86 to incorporate o Procedure j Review Committee in lieu of the Reactor Sciety Committee. The proposed

. Procedure Review Committee is to rnonitor activities pertinent to the .

I plcnning for decernmissioning of the RER. Action by the Division of g

Reactor Licensing on this request is still pending.

i '!n possing, Lockheed wishes to review the circumstences lecding to the AEC's visit of

, September 9,1970. This wcs not a " routine" AEC inspection. Lockheed mailed o i request for en cmendment to Fccility License R-85 to the Division of Reactor Licensing j on August 14, 1970, and subsequently discussed the situation with the Division of Recctor Licensing staff by phone, it was recognized that there were crecs in which

the Technical Specifications were -- or soon would be -- violcted, and accorcingly Lockheed csked for guidence. The Division of Reactor Licensing suggested th=r this f morter be discussed with the Region il Complience Office; Contact was mcoe with -

! Mr. Siddell of your office on August 31. As o result of that discussion, Mr. Lewis j cnd Mr. Peery were invited to visit LGNL ct their convenience. The AEC subsequently i cdvised Lockheed of tne crecs -- inclueing wcys in which the Technical Specifications were currently being violcted -- which the AEC would be interested in discussing.

f, i' At the meeting Lockheed brought some of the items of noncomplicnce to the AEC's cttention. Lockheed hcd enticipcted timely AEC cetion on the recuests contcined in the letter of August 14, one it was not Lockheed's inten Ion to violcte the provisions t of the Technical Specificctions without bringing the situation to rne ettention of the I AEC.

I f'

' OcWced wi>hes :o emp :asice that none of the i enc liuct; r,n tr,t: i9 t rr. / ~ C #,'O con >:itute actual "opeiasing violations. In July the fuel wa:. acenoved i orr. re,c

) receror in cecordonce with valid operating proccdures end is properly stored in the ,

stor ge pool in authorized criticality-sofe containers. The items cited on the form L AEC-592 would routine
y have been cecomplished in tne proper menner if operction
of the recercr were cont
nuir.g.

If you neve ony further cuest*ons cbout the o'c ove comments, plecse contcci M. A. Dewar et telephone r.o. 424-C3o7.

Very truly yours, LOCKHEED-GEORGIA COM?ANY n

1 .

' is . E . O rms:.y Vice Presicent - Engineering RBO:pb ....

/y  %. , , . .I' f,'T:.".k.GDl'{,9%ges;,'.l*

l.

y  :'is;. ,. . l',, ... , s.

e,,,. ,. .

, , g n ,gc. Tv n. ;, n 9. . ':.ya ; :.-2,M, ; 4, ,e - - - - ' "-

t[<- ::i 2 & A~ . . 'l.,1

~ . c. ;'.:

.. . e,.- e .

c. ?#-y, j, ,=

, . .