ML072710663: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 06/06/2006
| issue date = 06/06/2006
| title = Viewgraphs of Use of Ultrasonic Flow Measurement to Determine Reactor Power
| title = Viewgraphs of Use of Ultrasonic Flow Measurement to Determine Reactor Power
| author name = Lyon W C, Nakoski J A
| author name = Lyon W, Nakoski J
| author affiliation = NRC/NRO/DCIP/CQVB, NRC/NRR/ADES/DSS
| author affiliation = NRC/NRO/DCIP/CQVB, NRC/NRR/ADES/DSS
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:WLA/ýi[ Or'A USE OF ULTRASONIC FLOW MEASUREMENT TO DETERMINE REACTOR POWER-PURPOSE OF THIS PRESENTATION.
{{#Wiki_filter:WLA/ýi[ Or'A USE OF ULTRASONIC FLOW MEASUREMENT TO DETERMINE REACTOR POWER
* To inform the ET and the LT of the status of the staffs review of the application of ultrasonic flow meters (UFMs) in determining reactor power* MEASURE FOR SUCCESS OF THIS PRESENTATION
    -PURPOSE OF THIS PRESENTATION.
+ ET and LT are aware of staff activities
* To inform the ET and the LT of the status of the staffs review of the application of ultrasonic flow meters (UFMs) in determining reactor power
+ ET and LT are advised of potential need for regulatory action to address deficiencies in the application of UFMs PRESENTERS:
* MEASURE FOR SUCCESS OF THIS PRESENTATION
Warren Lyon Presentation Date: June 8, 2006 1 K.'.'
    +   ET and LT are aware of staff activities
John Nakoski 2 BACKGROUND
    +   ET and LT are advised of potential need for regulatory action to address deficiencies in the application of UFMs PRESENTERS: Warren Lyon                                             Presentation Date: June 8, 2006 1
,/ UFMs uses: Feedwater flow measurement for MURs and power recovery v/ Appendix K to 10 CFR 50.46 changed to allow decrease in 2% uncertainty assumption for reactor power used in LOCA analyses V Importance is tied to compliance with the licensed thermal power upon which accident and transient analyses are conducted V Currently, 2 UFM devices have approved topical reports* Caldon -Check and CheckPlus* Westinghouse/AMAG  
K.'.'
-Crossflow 3 CROSSFLOW UFM HISTORY 1999 Generic Crossflow UFM topical report approved.
 
Licensees beging requesting MURs January 2003 -Byron/Braidwood operating above rated thermal power (RTP). Region III requests NRR assistance on review of allegation related to Crossflow application at Byron/Braidwood.
John Nakoski 2
July 2003 -Ft. Calhoun submits first MUR LAR based on Crossflow August 2003 -Byron/Braidwood reduce power, staff begins assessment of basis for operating above RTP. Power recovery application of Crossflow UFM.January 2004 -NRC approves Ft. Calhoun MUR LAR February 2004 -NRC establishes task group to review UFMs May 2004 -Ft. Calhoun licensed RTP returned to pre-MUR level July 2004 -NRC task group identifies issues and recommends actions.January 2005, Calvert Cliffs and March 2005, Ft. Calhoun submit MUR LARs based on Crossflow August 2005 -Westinghouse, Calvert Cliffs, & Ft. Calhoun provided issues related to Crossflow 4 CROSSFLOW UFM HISTORY (con't)* September 2005 -New issue identified with Crossflow use at Calvert Cliffs. Swirl in feedwater flow adversely affects Crossflow measurement.
 
* October 2005 -Staff places Calvert Cliffs and Ft. Calhoun MUR reviews on hold* October 2005 to January 2006 -Calvert Cliffs, Ft. Calhoun, W/AMAG, Owners Group, & NRC continue interactions on issue resolution.
BACKGROUND
NRC obze.es tracer testing at Calvert Cliffs.* February 2006 -NRR staff completes theoretical assessment of Crossflow uncertainty claim.Additional RAIs provided to W/AMAG* March 2006 -NRC & W/AMAG meet to discuss RAI responses* April 2006 -NRC provides detailed RAls on issues that must be resolved for use of Crossflow.
,/ UFMs uses: Feedwater flow measurement for MURs and power recovery v/ Appendix K to 10 CFR 50.46 changed to allow decrease in 2% uncertainty assumption for reactor power used in LOCA analyses V Importance is tied to compliance with the licensed thermal power upon which accident and transient analyses are conducted V Currently, 2 UFM devices have approved topical reports
NRR issues User's Need memo to RES to peer review theoretical assessment.
* Caldon - Check and CheckPlus
W/AMAG describe model being developed that confirms original bases. Staff informs W/AMAG of schedule for and issues to be resolved for completion of reviews.* May 2006 -RES provides response to NRR User's Need memo. RES substantiated NRR position that Crossflow does not obtain sufficient information to support uncertainty analyses.+ June 2006 -W/AMAG provide additional information on theoretical and empirical bases for Crossflow uncertainty claim.5 OVERVIEW$ Caldon Check and CheckPlus UFMs are acceptable
* Westinghouse/AMAG - Crossflow 3
$ Westinghouse/Advanced Measurement and Analysis Group (W/AMAG)review is ongoing. Anticipated staff finding is unacceptable.
 
RES supports NRR position on capability of Crossflow UFM.,$ Use of external UFMs for power recovery under 10 CFR 50.59 has not been shown to be acceptable 6
CROSSFLOW UFM HISTORY 1999 Generic Crossflow UFM topical report approved. Licensees beging requesting MURs January 2003 - Byron/Braidwood operating above rated thermal power (RTP). Region III requests NRR assistance on review of allegation related to Crossflow application at Byron/Braidwood.
PLANT-SPECIFIC STATUS -RECENT MUR LARs/ Seabrook (Caldon) UFM is acceptable (ML061360034, May 22, 2006)V Calvert Cliffs (W/AMAG) is on hold -an amended LAR is anticipated V Ft. Calhoun (W/AMAG) is on hold pending generic review completion 7
July 2003 - Ft. Calhoun submits first MUR LAR based on Crossflow August 2003 - Byron/Braidwood reduce power, staff begins assessment of basis for operating above RTP. Power recovery application of Crossflow UFM.
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA Traceability  
January 2004 - NRC approves Ft. Calhoun MUR LAR February 2004 - NRC establishes task group to review UFMs May 2004 - Ft. Calhoun licensed RTP returned to pre-MUR level July 2004 - NRC task group identifies issues and recommends actions.
-relating a measurement to a standard Standard maintained by a national laboratory  
January 2005, Calvert Cliffs and March 2005, Ft. Calhoun submit MUR LARs based on Crossflow August 2005 - Westinghouse, Calvert Cliffs, & Ft. Calhoun provided issues related to Crossflow 4
-National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)Each step between measurement and standard -clearly defined and no unverified assumptions Unbroken path between measurement and standard Total measurement uncertainty reflects aggregate uncertainties of each step Applicability  
 
-provide accurate information over range of use* Sound basis (theoretical understanding or equivalent)
CROSSFLOW UFM HISTORY (con't)
* September 2005 - New issue identified with Crossflow use at Calvert Cliffs. Swirl in feedwater flow adversely affects Crossflow measurement.
* October 2005 - Staff places Calvert Cliffs and Ft. Calhoun MUR reviews on hold
* October 2005 to January 2006 - Calvert Cliffs, Ft. Calhoun, W/AMAG, Owners Group, & NRC continue interactions on issue resolution. NRC obze.es tracer testing at Calvert Cliffs.
* February 2006 - NRR staff completes theoretical assessment of Crossflow uncertainty claim.
Additional RAIs provided to W/AMAG
* March 2006 - NRC & W/AMAG meet to discuss RAI responses
* April 2006 - NRC provides detailed RAls on issues that must be resolved for use of Crossflow.
NRR issues User's Need memo to RES to peer review theoretical assessment. W/AMAG describe model being developed that confirms original bases. Staff informs W/AMAG of schedule for and issues to be resolved for completion of reviews.
* May 2006 - RES provides response to NRR User's Need memo. RES substantiated NRR position that Crossflow does not obtain sufficient information to support uncertainty analyses.
+ June 2006 - W/AMAG provide additional information on theoretical and empirical bases for Crossflow uncertainty claim.
5
 
OVERVIEW
$ Caldon Check and CheckPlus UFMs are acceptable
$ Westinghouse/Advanced Measurement and Analysis Group (W/AMAG) review is ongoing. Anticipated staff finding is unacceptable. RES supports NRR position on capability of Crossflow UFM.
,$ Use of external UFMs for power recovery under 10 CFR 50.59 has not been shown to be acceptable 6
 
PLANT-SPECIFIC STATUS - RECENT MUR LARs
/ Seabrook (Caldon) UFM is acceptable (ML061360034, May 22, 2006)
V Calvert Cliffs (W/AMAG) is on hold - an amended LAR is anticipated V Ft. Calhoun (W/AMAG) is on hold pending generic review completion 7
 
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA Traceability - relating a measurement to a standard Standard maintained by a national laboratory - National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
Each step between measurement and standard - clearly defined and no unverified assumptions Unbroken path between measurement and standard Total measurement uncertainty reflects aggregate uncertainties of each step Applicability - provide accurate information over range of use
* Sound basis (theoretical understanding or equivalent)
Calibration is constant or change is fully understood, predictable, and verifiable 8
Calibration is constant or change is fully understood, predictable, and verifiable 8
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA ASSESSMENT V Caldon Check and Checkplus meet all criteria/ VW/AMAG Crossflow has not been shown to meet criteria, but staff has not completed review of all submitted information 9
 
Ultrasonic Flow Meter Comparison Caldon Check & CheckPlus W/AMAG Crossflow m rn I~.A... ..... .... ..... .. ...M -7.7; ... ..... .....1-IJ.LL:1 4:.,4: 10  
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA ASSESSMENT V Caldon Check and Checkplus meet all criteria
*W/AMAG CROSSFLOW REGULATORY IMPACT Potentially effected measurement uncertainty recapture power uprates: Plant % Uprate MWt 1 Increase Salem 1&, 8 2 1.4 48 x 2 =96 Hope Creek 1.4 46 SONGS 2&3 1.42 48 x 2 =96 STP 1&2 1.4 53 x 2= 106 Plant % Uprate MWt Increase Pilgrim 1.5 30 Hatch 1&2 1.4 48 x 2 = 96 Kewaunee 1.4 23 Palisades 1.4 35.4* Total MWt increase from Use of Crossflow based MURs = 528 MWt* This equates to about 185 MWe* Regulatory impact from the use of Crossflow for power recovery has not been fully assessed 11 W/AMAG CROSSFLOW CONCLUSIONS
/ VW/AMAG Crossflow has not been shown to meet criteria, but staff has not completed review of all submitted information 9
,/ Theoretical, analytical, and understanding basis is weak ,/ Empirical data basis is weak/ Meter self-assessment does not appear viable S"'An unbroken path from calibration used during meter operation to reference standards has not been achieved ,/ NRC-approved topic report is no longer valid ,/ NRC review is nearing completion although work remains/" Regulatory action may be required to address the use of Crossflow and other external UFMs for MURs and power recovery applications 12}}
 
Ultrasonic Flow Meter Comparison Caldon Check & CheckPlus W/AMAG Crossflow
                              ... .. . ...... .. ........
rn I~.A M -7.7;                           ...
1-IJ                               .LL
:1 4:.
,4:
10
 
            *W/AMAG CROSSFLOW REGULATORY IMPACT Potentially effected measurement uncertainty recapture power uprates:
Plant           % Uprate MWt         1   Plant      % Uprate MWt Increase                            Increase Salem 1&,82        1.4   48 x 2 =96     Pilgrim      1.5    30 Hope Creek         1.4   46             Hatch 1&2     1.4    48 x 2 = 96 SONGS 2&3        1.42  48 x 2 =96      Kewaunee      1.4    23 STP 1&2           1.4   53 x 2= 106    Palisades     1.4   35.4
* Total MWt increase from Use of Crossflow based MURs = 528 MWt
* This equates to about 185 MWe
* Regulatory impact from the use of Crossflow for power recovery has not been fully assessed 11
 
W/AMAG CROSSFLOW CONCLUSIONS
,/   Theoretical, analytical, and understanding basis is weak
,/   Empirical data basis is weak
/     Meter self-assessment does not appear viable S"'An unbroken path from calibration used during meter operation to reference standards has not been achieved
,/   NRC-approved topic report is no longer valid
,/   NRC review is nearing completion although work remains
/"   Regulatory action may be required to address the use of Crossflow and other external UFMs for MURs and power recovery applications 12}}

Latest revision as of 15:36, 22 March 2020

Viewgraphs of Use of Ultrasonic Flow Measurement to Determine Reactor Power
ML072710663
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs, Byron, Braidwood, Fort Calhoun  Omaha Public Power District icon.png
Issue date: 06/06/2006
From: Lyon W, John Nakoski
NRC/NRO/DCIP/CQVB, NRC/NRR/ADES/DSS
To:
References
FOIA/PA-2007-0255
Download: ML072710663 (12)


Text

WLA/ýi[ Or'A USE OF ULTRASONIC FLOW MEASUREMENT TO DETERMINE REACTOR POWER

-PURPOSE OF THIS PRESENTATION.

  • To inform the ET and the LT of the status of the staffs review of the application of ultrasonic flow meters (UFMs) in determining reactor power
  • MEASURE FOR SUCCESS OF THIS PRESENTATION

+ ET and LT are aware of staff activities

+ ET and LT are advised of potential need for regulatory action to address deficiencies in the application of UFMs PRESENTERS: Warren Lyon Presentation Date: June 8, 2006 1

K.'.'

John Nakoski 2

BACKGROUND

,/ UFMs uses: Feedwater flow measurement for MURs and power recovery v/ Appendix K to 10 CFR 50.46 changed to allow decrease in 2% uncertainty assumption for reactor power used in LOCA analyses V Importance is tied to compliance with the licensed thermal power upon which accident and transient analyses are conducted V Currently, 2 UFM devices have approved topical reports

  • Caldon - Check and CheckPlus
  • Westinghouse/AMAG - Crossflow 3

CROSSFLOW UFM HISTORY 1999 Generic Crossflow UFM topical report approved. Licensees beging requesting MURs January 2003 - Byron/Braidwood operating above rated thermal power (RTP). Region III requests NRR assistance on review of allegation related to Crossflow application at Byron/Braidwood.

July 2003 - Ft. Calhoun submits first MUR LAR based on Crossflow August 2003 - Byron/Braidwood reduce power, staff begins assessment of basis for operating above RTP. Power recovery application of Crossflow UFM.

January 2004 - NRC approves Ft. Calhoun MUR LAR February 2004 - NRC establishes task group to review UFMs May 2004 - Ft. Calhoun licensed RTP returned to pre-MUR level July 2004 - NRC task group identifies issues and recommends actions.

January 2005, Calvert Cliffs and March 2005, Ft. Calhoun submit MUR LARs based on Crossflow August 2005 - Westinghouse, Calvert Cliffs, & Ft. Calhoun provided issues related to Crossflow 4

CROSSFLOW UFM HISTORY (con't)

  • September 2005 - New issue identified with Crossflow use at Calvert Cliffs. Swirl in feedwater flow adversely affects Crossflow measurement.
  • October 2005 - Staff places Calvert Cliffs and Ft. Calhoun MUR reviews on hold
  • October 2005 to January 2006 - Calvert Cliffs, Ft. Calhoun, W/AMAG, Owners Group, & NRC continue interactions on issue resolution. NRC obze.es tracer testing at Calvert Cliffs.
  • February 2006 - NRR staff completes theoretical assessment of Crossflow uncertainty claim.

Additional RAIs provided to W/AMAG

  • March 2006 - NRC & W/AMAG meet to discuss RAI responses
  • April 2006 - NRC provides detailed RAls on issues that must be resolved for use of Crossflow.

NRR issues User's Need memo to RES to peer review theoretical assessment. W/AMAG describe model being developed that confirms original bases. Staff informs W/AMAG of schedule for and issues to be resolved for completion of reviews.

  • May 2006 - RES provides response to NRR User's Need memo. RES substantiated NRR position that Crossflow does not obtain sufficient information to support uncertainty analyses.

+ June 2006 - W/AMAG provide additional information on theoretical and empirical bases for Crossflow uncertainty claim.

5

OVERVIEW

$ Caldon Check and CheckPlus UFMs are acceptable

$ Westinghouse/Advanced Measurement and Analysis Group (W/AMAG) review is ongoing. Anticipated staff finding is unacceptable. RES supports NRR position on capability of Crossflow UFM.

,$ Use of external UFMs for power recovery under 10 CFR 50.59 has not been shown to be acceptable 6

PLANT-SPECIFIC STATUS - RECENT MUR LARs

/ Seabrook (Caldon) UFM is acceptable (ML061360034, May 22, 2006)

V Calvert Cliffs (W/AMAG) is on hold - an amended LAR is anticipated V Ft. Calhoun (W/AMAG) is on hold pending generic review completion 7

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA Traceability - relating a measurement to a standard Standard maintained by a national laboratory - National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)

Each step between measurement and standard - clearly defined and no unverified assumptions Unbroken path between measurement and standard Total measurement uncertainty reflects aggregate uncertainties of each step Applicability - provide accurate information over range of use

  • Sound basis (theoretical understanding or equivalent)

Calibration is constant or change is fully understood, predictable, and verifiable 8

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA ASSESSMENT V Caldon Check and Checkplus meet all criteria

/ VW/AMAG Crossflow has not been shown to meet criteria, but staff has not completed review of all submitted information 9

Ultrasonic Flow Meter Comparison Caldon Check & CheckPlus W/AMAG Crossflow

... .. m . ...... .. ........

rn I~.A M -7.7; ...

1-IJ .LL

1 4:.

,4:

10

Plant  % Uprate MWt 1 Plant  % Uprate MWt Increase Increase Salem 1&,82 1.4 48 x 2 =96 Pilgrim 1.5 30 Hope Creek 1.4 46 Hatch 1&2 1.4 48 x 2 = 96 SONGS 2&3 1.42 48 x 2 =96 Kewaunee 1.4 23 STP 1&2 1.4 53 x 2= 106 Palisades 1.4 35.4

  • Total MWt increase from Use of Crossflow based MURs = 528 MWt
  • This equates to about 185 MWe
  • Regulatory impact from the use of Crossflow for power recovery has not been fully assessed 11

W/AMAG CROSSFLOW CONCLUSIONS

,/ Theoretical, analytical, and understanding basis is weak

,/ Empirical data basis is weak

/ Meter self-assessment does not appear viable S"'An unbroken path from calibration used during meter operation to reference standards has not been achieved

,/ NRC-approved topic report is no longer valid

,/ NRC review is nearing completion although work remains

/" Regulatory action may be required to address the use of Crossflow and other external UFMs for MURs and power recovery applications 12