RBG-47120, Unit 1, Seventeenth Fuel Cycle Core Operating Limits Report (COLR): Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 02/17/2011 | | issue date = 02/17/2011 | ||
| title = Unit 1, Seventeenth Fuel Cycle Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) | | title = Unit 1, Seventeenth Fuel Cycle Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) | ||
| author name = Lorfing D | | author name = Lorfing D | ||
| author affiliation = Entergy Operations, Inc | | author affiliation = Entergy Operations, Inc | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:Entergy Operations, Inc. | ||
Entergy River Bend Station 5485 U.S. Highway 61 N St. Francisville, LA 70775 Tel 225-381-4157 David N. Lorfing Manager, Licensing February 17, 2011 RBG-47120 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
River Bend Station -Unit 1 Docket No. 50-458 License No. NPF-47 Seventeenth Fuel Cycle Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) | River Bend Station - Unit 1 Docket No. 50-458 License No. NPF-47 Seventeenth Fuel Cycle Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) | ||
==Dear Sir or Madam:== | ==Dear Sir or Madam:== | ||
Enclosed is Revision 0 of the River Bend Station (RBS) Core Operation Limits Report (COLR) for the seventeenth fuel cycle. This report is submitted in accordance with Technical Specification 5.6.5 of Appendix A of the Facility Operating License NPF-47. | |||
There are no commitments in this letter. For further information, contact me. | |||
Sincerely, Manager, Licensing River Bend Station f- Un DNL/bmb Abo I lakc | |||
RBG-47120 Page 2 of 2 cc: Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 NRC Senior Resident Inspector P. 0. Box 1050 St. Francisville, LA 70775 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Mr. Alan B. Wang MS 0-7 D1 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Mr. Jeffrey P. Meyers Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Office of Environmental Compliance Attn. OEC - ERSD P. O. Box 4312 Baton Rouge, LA 70821-4312 | |||
Core Operating Limits Report Cycle 17 Revision 0 | |||
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report Cycle 17 Revision 0 | |||
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 REVISION HISTORY Revision Revision Description 0 Original Issue PAGE 2 OF 95 | |||
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 SCOPE ........................................................................................................................... 4 | |||
==3.0 REFERENCES== | |||
............................................................................................................... 4 3.1 CURRENT CYCLE REFERENCES ....................................................................................... . ................. 4 3.2 METHODOLOGY REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................... 4 4.0 DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................. 7 5.0 CORE DESIGN ............................................................................................................... 9 5.1 REFERENCE CORE LOADING PATTERN ...................................................................................................... 9 5 .2 C O NTR O L R O DS ........................................................................................................................................ 9 6.0 AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (APLHGR) ..................... 9 7.0 MINIM UM CRITICAL POW ER RATIO (MCPR) ........................................................... 9 7.1 FLOW-DEPENDENT MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPRF) VALUES: ....................................................... 9 7.2 POWER-DEPENDENT MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPRp) VALUES: ................................................ 9 8.0 LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (LHGR) .............................................. | |||
Latest revision as of 06:55, 21 March 2020
ML110560315 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | River Bend ![]() |
Issue date: | 02/17/2011 |
From: | Lorfing D Entergy Operations |
To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
References | |
RBG-47120 | |
Download: ML110560315 (98) | |
Text
Entergy Operations, Inc.
Entergy River Bend Station 5485 U.S. Highway 61 N St. Francisville, LA 70775 Tel 225-381-4157 David N. Lorfing Manager, Licensing February 17, 2011 RBG-47120 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
River Bend Station - Unit 1 Docket No. 50-458 License No. NPF-47 Seventeenth Fuel Cycle Core Operating Limits Report (COLR)
Dear Sir or Madam:
Enclosed is Revision 0 of the River Bend Station (RBS) Core Operation Limits Report (COLR) for the seventeenth fuel cycle. This report is submitted in accordance with Technical Specification 5.6.5 of Appendix A of the Facility Operating License NPF-47.
There are no commitments in this letter. For further information, contact me.
Sincerely, Manager, Licensing River Bend Station f- Un DNL/bmb Abo I lakc
RBG-47120 Page 2 of 2 cc: Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 NRC Senior Resident Inspector P. 0. Box 1050 St. Francisville, LA 70775 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Mr. Alan B. Wang MS 0-7 D1 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Mr. Jeffrey P. Meyers Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Office of Environmental Compliance Attn. OEC - ERSD P. O. Box 4312 Baton Rouge, LA 70821-4312
Core Operating Limits Report Cycle 17 Revision 0
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report Cycle 17 Revision 0
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 REVISION HISTORY Revision Revision Description 0 Original Issue PAGE 2 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 SCOPE ........................................................................................................................... 4
3.0 REFERENCES
............................................................................................................... 4 3.1 CURRENT CYCLE REFERENCES ....................................................................................... . ................. 4 3.2 METHODOLOGY REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................... 4 4.0 DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................. 7 5.0 CORE DESIGN ............................................................................................................... 9 5.1 REFERENCE CORE LOADING PATTERN ...................................................................................................... 9 5 .2 C O NTR O L R O DS ........................................................................................................................................ 9 6.0 AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (APLHGR) ..................... 9 7.0 MINIM UM CRITICAL POW ER RATIO (MCPR) ........................................................... 9 7.1 FLOW-DEPENDENT MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPRF) VALUES: ....................................................... 9 7.2 POWER-DEPENDENT MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPRp) VALUES: ................................................ 9 8.0 LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (LHGR) ......................................................... 10 8.1 EXPOSURE-DEPENDENT LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (LHGR) VALUES: ....................... .......................... 10 8.2 FLOW-DEPENDENT LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE FACTORS (LHGRFACF) VALUES: ................................. 10 8.3 FLOW-DEPENDENT LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE FACTORS (LHGRFACF) VALUES: .............................. 11 9.0 STABILITY ................................................................................................................... 11 9.1 STABILITY REGION BOUNDARIES AND SETPOINTS ........................................................................................ 11 9.2 APRM FLOW BIASED SIMULATED THERMAL POWER-HIGH TIME CONSTANT (SR 3.3.1.1.14) ..................... 12 PAGE 3 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 1.0 PURPOSE The COLR is controlled as a License Basis Document and revised accordingly for each fuel cycle or remaining portion of a fuel cycle. Any revisions to the COLR must be submitted to the NRC for information as required by Tech Spec 5.6.5 and tracked by RBS License Commitment Ll1358.
2.0 SCOPE As defined in Technical Specification 1.1, the COLR is the document that provides the core operating limits for the current fuel cycle. This document is prepared in accordance with Technical Specification 5.6.5 for each reload cycle using NRC-approved analytical methods.
The limits included in this report are:
- 4) LCO 3.2.4, Fraction of Core Boiling Boundary (FCBB)
- 5) LCO 3.3.1.1, RPS Instrumentation (RPS), Function 2.b
- 6) LCO 3.3.1.3, Periodic Based Detection System (PBDS)
3.0 REFERENCES
This section contains the background, cycle-specific, and methodology references used in the current cycle reload analysis.
3.1 Current Cycle References 3.2.1 ECH-NE-10-00084 Revision 1, Supplemental Reload Licensing Report for River Bend Station -
Unit 1 Reload 16 Cycle 17.
3.2.2 ECH-NE-10-00066 Revision 1, GNF2 Fuel Design Cycle-Independent Analyses for Entergy River Bend.
3.2.3 ECH-NE-10-00085 Revision 0, Fuel Bundle Information Report for River Bend Station - Unit 1 Reload 16 Cycle 17.
3.2.4 NEAD-SR-01/052.RI, Revision 002, "RBS ElA COLR Inputs and FCTR Card Drive Flow Alignment Constants.
3.2.5 Letter, R.E. Kingston to G. W. Scronce, "Time Constant Values for Simulated Thermal Power Monitor" GFP-1032 November 30, 1995.
3.2.6 RBS Updated Safety Analysis Report 3.2 Methodology References PAGE 4 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 The Technical Specifications (TS) supported by each methodology reference are provided in brackets.
The following are applicable to ATRIUM-10 fuel.
3.3.1 XN-NF-81-58(P)(A) Revision 2 and Supplements 1 and 2, "RODEX2 Fuel Rod Thermal-Mechanical Response Evaluation Model," Exxon Nuclear Company, March 1984.
3.3.2 XN-NF-85-67(P)(A) Revision 1, "Generic Mechanical Design for Exxon Nuclear Jet Pump BWR Reload Fuel," Exxon Nuclear Company, September 1986.
3.3.3 EMF-85-74(P) Revision 0 Supplement 1 (P)(A) and Supplement 2 (P)(A), "RODEX2A (BWR)
Fuel Rod Thermal-Mechanical Evaluation Model, Siemens Power Corporation," February 1998.
3.3.4 ANF-89-98(P)(A) Revision 1 and Supplement 1, "Generic Mechanical Design Criteria for BWR Fuel Designs," Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation, May 1995.
3.3.5 XN-NF-80-19(P)(A) Volume 1 and Supplements 1 and 2, "Exxon Nuclear Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors - Neutronic Methods for Design and Analysis, Exxon Nuclear Company,"
March 1983.
3.3.6 XN-NF-80-19(P)(A) Volume 4 Revision 1, "Exxon Nuclear Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors: Application of the ENC Methodology to BWR Reloads, Exxon Nuclear Company,"
June 1986.
3.3.7 EMF-2158(P)(A) Revision 0, "Siemens Power Corporation Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors: Evaluation and Validation of CASMO-MICROBURN-B2, Siemens Power Corporation,"
October 1999.
3.3.8 XN-NF-80-19(P)(A) Volume 3 Revision 2, "Exxon Nuclear Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors, THERMEX: Thermal Limits Methodology Summary Description," Exxon Nuclear Company, January 1987.
3.3.9 XN-NF-84-105(P)(A), Volume 1 and Supplements 1 and 2, "XCOBRA-T: A Computer Code for BWR Transient Thermal Hydraulic Core Analysis," Exxon Nuclear Company, February 1987.
3.3.10 ANF-524(P)(A) Revision 2 and Supplements 1 and 2, "ANF Critical Power Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors," Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation, November 1990.
3.3.11 ANF-913 (P)(A), Volume 1, Revision 1 and Volume 1 Supplements 2, 3 and 4, "COTRANSA2: A Computer Program for Boiling Water Reactor Transient Analyses," Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation, August 1990.
3.3.12 XN-NF-825(P)(A) Supplement 2, "BWR/6 Generic Rod Withdrawal Error Analysis MCPR for Plant Operation Within the Extended Operating Domain," Exxon Nuclear Company, Oc ober 1986.
3.3.13 ANF-1358(P)(A) Revision 3, "The Loss of Feedwater Heating Transient in Boiling Water Reactors," Framatome ANP, September 2005.
3.3.14 EMF-1997(P)(A) Revision 0, "ANFB-10 Critical Power Correlation," Siemens Power Corporation, July 1998.
3.3.15 EMF-1997(P), Supplement 1(P)(A), Revision 0, "ANFB-10 Critical Power Correlation: High Local Peaking Results, Siemens Power Corporation," July 1998.
PAGE 5 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 3.3.16 EMF-2209(P)(A) Revision 2, "SPCB Critical Power Correlation, Siemens Power Corporation,"
September 2003.
3.3.17 EMF-2245(P)(A) Revision 0, "Application of Siemens Power Corporation's Critical Power Correlations to Co-Resident Fuel," Siemens Power Corporation, August 2000.
3.3.18 EMF-2361 (P)(A) Revision 0, "EXEM BWR-2000 ECCS Evaluation Model," Framatome ANP Richland, Inc., May 2001.
3.3.19 EMF-2292(P)(A) Revision 0, "ATRIUM-10: Appendix K Spray Heat Transfer Coefficients, Siemens Power Corporation," September 2000.
3.3.20 EMF-CC-074(P)(A) Volume 4 Revision 0, "BWR Stability Analysis-Assessment of STAIF with Input from MICROBURN-B2," Siemens Power Corporation, August 2000.
The following are applicable to GNF supplied fuel.
3.3.21 NEDC-33383P, Revision 1, "GEXL97 Correlation Applicable to ATRIUM-10 Fuel," June, 2008.
3.3.22 NEDE-24011-P-A, General Electric Standard Application for Reactor Fuel (GESTAR-II).
PAGE 6 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 4.0 DEFINITIONS 4.1 Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (APLHGR) - the APLHGR shall be applicable to a specific planar height and is equal to the sum of the linear heat generation rates for all the fuel rods in the specified bundle at the specified height divided by the number of fuel rods in the fuel bundle.
4.2 Average Planar Exposure - the Average Planar Exposure shall be applicable to a specific planar height and is equal to the sum of the exposure of all the fuel rods in the specified bundle at the specified height divided by the number of fuel rods' in the fuel bundle.
4.3 Critical Power Ratio (CPR) - the ratio of that power in the assembly, which is calculated by application of the fuel vendors appropriate boiling correlation, to cause some point in the assembly to experience boiling transition, divided by the actual assembly operating power.
4.4 Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) - The River Bend Station specific document that provides core operating limits for the current reload cycle in accordance with Technical Specification 5.6.5.
4.5 Linear Heat Generation Rate (LHGR) - the LHGR shall be the heat generation per unit length of fuel rod. It is the integral of the heat flux over the heat transfer area associated with the unit length.
4.6 Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPR) - the MCPR shall be the smallest CPR which exists in the core.
4.7 MCPR Safety Limit - the minimum value of the CPR at which the fuel could be operated with the expected number of rods in boiling transition not exceeding 0.1% of the fuel rods in the core.
4.8 Aligned Drive Flow - Adjusted FCTR card input drive flow signal that accounts for actual variations in the core flow to drive flow relationship.
4.9 Monitored Region - The area of the core power and flow operating domain where the reactor may be susceptible to reactor instabilities under conditions exceeding the licensing basis of the current reactor system.
4.10 Restricted Region - The area of the core power and flow operating domain where the reactor is susceptible to reactor instabilities in the absence of restrictions on core void distributions.
4.11 Setpoint "Setup" - A FCTR card feature that sets the normal "non-setup" ElA APRM flow-biased scram and control rod block trip reference setpoints associated with the Exclusion and Restricted Regions higher to permit required reactor maneuvering in the Restricted Region when stability controls are in effect.
4.12 EOR - the cycle exposure corresponding to all rods out, 100% power/100% flow, and normal feedwater temperature.
4.13 MOC - Middle of Cycle (EOR- 2,485 MWd/MTU).
4.14 EOC-End of Cycle (Core Exposure 32,789 MWd/MTU).
4.15 FFWTR - Final Feedwater Temperature Reduction.
PAGE 7 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 4.16 FHOOS - Feedwater Heater Out of Service.
4.17 PROOS - Pressure Regulator Out of Service.
4.18 SLO - Single Loop Operation.
4.19 TBOOS -Turbine Bypass Out of Service 4.20 AREVA - AREVA NP Inc.
4.21 GNF - Global Nuclear Fuel 4.22 EOC-RPT - End of Cycle Recirculation Pump Trip 4.23 Reference Core Loading Pattern - The Core Loading Pattern Used for Reload Licensing Analysis.
4.24 Application Condition - The combination of equipment out of service conditions for which LHGRFAC and MCPR limits are determined. The Application Conditions are as follows:
Application FWHOOS / EOC-RPT PROOS TBOOS Condition FFWTR OOS I x 2 X X 3 X X 4 X X 5 X X X 6 X X X 7 X X X X All application conditions address the licensed core flow.
PAGE 8 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 5.0 CORE DESIGN 5.1 Reference Core Loading Pattern The Reference Core Loading pattern and the as-loaded core are presented in Reference 3.2.1.
5.2 Control Rods The River Bend core utilizes the GE design control rods, non GE design CR-82M and CR-82M-1 bottom entry cruciform control rods. These control rod designs are discussed in more detail in Reference 3.2.6, Sections 4.1 and 4.2.
6.0 AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (APLHGR)
Per Technical Specification 3.2.1, all APLHGR values shall not exceed the exposure-dependent limits reported as follows:
Fuel Type Figure GNF2 6.1-1a GEl4 6.1-1b ATRIUM-10 6.1-1c For single loop operation (SLO) a multiplier of 0.83 is applied to the APLHGR limits for all fuel types.
7.0 MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPR)
Per Technical Specification 3.2.2, the MCPR values shall be equal to or greater than the operating limit.
The operating limit is the maximum of the flow-dependent minimum critical power ratio (MCPRF) and the power-dependent minimum critical power ratio (MCPRp).
MCPRF and MCPRp limits are provided in Sections 7.1 and 7.2 below. These limits address the different fuel types, exposure ranges and application conditions.
For single recirculation loop operation (SLO), the MCPR limit is increased by 0.02 to address the difference in the safety limit MCPR reported in Technical Specification 2.1.1.2.
7.1 Flow-Dependent Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPRF) Values:
The MCPRF curves are found in the following figures:
Application Exposure Condition(s) Fuel Type(s) Range Figure 1, 2, 3 GNF2, GEl4, ATRIUM-10 BOC-EOC 7.1-1 4, 5, 6, 7 GNF2, GEl4, ATRIUM-10 BOC-EOC 7.1-2 7.2 Power-Dependent Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPRp) Values:
PAGE 9 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 The MCPRp curves are found in the following figures:
Figure Application BOC - MOC MOC - EOC Conditions GNF2 GE14 ATRIUM-10 GNF2 GE14 ATRIUM-10 1 7.2-1a 7.2-1b 7.2-1c 7.2-1d 7.2-ie 7.2-1f 2 7.2-2a 7.2-2b 7.2-2c 7.2-2d 7.2-2e 7.2-2f 3 7.2-3a 7.2-3b 7.2-3c 7.2-3d 7.2-3e 7.2-3f 4 7.2-4a 7.2-4b 7.2-4c 7.2-4d 7.2-4e 7.2-4f 5 7.2-5a 7.2-5b 7.2-5c 7.2-5d 7.2-5e 7.2-5f 6 7.2-6a 7.2-6b 7.2-6c 7.2-6d 7.2-6e 7.2-6f 7 7.2-7a 7.2-7b 7.2-7c 7.2-7d 7.2-7e 7.2-7f More limiting values of the power dependent limits may be used in lieu of those indicated by a particular operating mode. For example EOC values may be used instead of the MOC values.
8.0 LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (LHGR)
Per Technical Specification 3.2.3, the LHGR values for any rod at any axial location shall not exceed the exposure-dependent limits multiplied by the smaller of either the power-dependent or flow-dependent LHGR factors.
For single loop operation (SLO) a multiplier of 0.83 is applied to the LHGR limits for all fuel types.
For two recirculation loop and single recirculation loop operation the LHGR multiplier is as follows:
For two recirculation loop operation:
LHGRFAC = MIN(LHGRFACp, LGHRFACF)
For single loop operation:
LHGRFAC = MIN(LHGRFACp, LGHRFACF, 0.83) 8.1 Exposure-Dependent Linear Heat Generation Rate (LHGR) Values:
GNF2 and GE14 exposure-dependent LHGR values are considered GNF proprietary and will not be contained in the COLR. The GNF2 and GE14 LHGR values may be found in Reference 3.2.3.
ATRIUM-10 exposure-dependent LHGR values are contained in Figure 8.1-1.
8.2 Flow-Dependent Linear Heat Generation Rate Factors (LHGRFACF) Values:
There is one set flow-dependent LHGRFAC values. It is applicable to all application conditions and fuel types and is contained in Figure 8.2-1.
PAGE 10 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 8.3 Power-Dependent Linear Heat Generation Rate Factors (LHGRFACp) Values:
The LHGRFACp curves are found in the following figures:
Figure Application BOC - MOC MOC - EOC Conditions GNF2 GEl4 ATRIUM-10 GNF2 GE14 ATRIUM-10 1&4 8.3-1a 8.3-1b 8.3-1c 8.3-1d 8.3-le 8.3-1f 2 8.3-2a 8.3-2b 8.3-2c 8.3-2d 8.3-2e 8.3-2f 3, 6 &7 8.3-3a 8.3-3b 8.3-3c 8.3-3d 8.3-3e 8.3-3f 58.3-4a 8.3-4b 8.3-4c 8.3-4d 8.3-4e 8.3-4f More limiting values of the power dependent multipliers may be used in lieu of those indicated by a particular operating mode. For example EOC values may be used instead of the MOC values.
9.0 STABILITY The following Technical Specifications / Technical Requirements contain stability related requirements:
- TS 3.2.4, Fraction of Core Boiling Boundary (FCBB)
- TS 3.3.1.1, RPS Instrumentation (RPS)
- TS 3.3.1.3, Periodic Based Detection System (PBDS)
- TR 3.3.2.1, Control Rod Block Instrumentation 9.1 Stability Region Boundaries and Setpoints This section contains region boundaries, setpoints and other stability related requirements. The stability region boundaries and setpoints are as follows Description Figure Monitored Region Boundary (Case 1) 9.1-1 Monitored Region Boundary (Case 2) 9.1-2 APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and 9.1-3 Restricted Region Boundary (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1)
APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and 9.1-4 Restricted Region Boundary (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2)
APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power- High Scram Setpoints and Restricted 9.1-5 Region Boundary (Single Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1)
APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power- High Scram Setpoints and Restricted 9.1-6 Region Boundary (Single Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2)
APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Two Recirculation 9.1-7 Loop Operation - Case 1)
PAGE 11 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 Description Figure APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Two Recirculation 9.1-8 Loop Operation - Case 2)
APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Single Recirculation 9.1-9 Loop Operation - Case 1)
APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Single Recirculation 9.1-10 Loop Operation - Case 2)
Note: For Figures 9.1-3 to 9.1-10, the Nominal Setpoints should be used for indicating the entry into a particular stability region as allowed and appropriate actions be taken prior to the entry In the table above, two distinct operating states (Case 1 and Case 2) are considered. These are described as follows:
Case I - Normal Feedwater Heating Operation or Low Reactor Power:
TFW (at rated)_Ž TFDESIGN (at rated)- 50 F, and rated equivalent at off-rated reactor conditions OR P _30%
Case 2 - Reduced Feedwater Heating Operation:
TFW (at rated) < TFDESIGN (at rated)- 500 F AND P>30%
The APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High scram setpoint and Restricted Region Boundary, and APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints are given in terms of aligned drive flow. The aligned drive flow is calculated from the input drive flow using the following relationship:
101.209-A 4° -31.028.A 1 0° +70.181°W5
-1 70.181-(A100 -,S40 )
Where: W5 = FCTR card input drive flow in percent rated, WD = Aligned drive flow in percent rated, A4° = Low flow drive flow alignment setting, and A10 = High flow drive flow alignment setting.
9.2 APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power-High Time Constant (SR 3.3.1.1.14)
The simulated thermal power time constant is 6 +/- 0.6 seconds (Reference 3.2.5). Thus the maximum simulated thermal power time constant for use in meeting the surveillance requirement is 6.6 seconds.
PAGE 12 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 6.1-1a MAXIMUM AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION FUEL TYPE: GNF2 15 14 13 = - - - - -- - ! ! ! ! ! ! I :! . . I . .
12
-I---- ----------
4.4 -1 -
L-..-*....
11
..I---
1.. L L........ . . . . ...L... 4 ----
10 .......... . -
--- 7--------
7 .. . ---. -I.... ... ..- --- ----
-7 T 9 ..........
...... .............. mmaa 1....
7 ...T ....
8 1---- 7 --- ----- ............ . .... ---- - ------- ---- --------- -------------- .............. ........... ----- -------------- I-- - --------
............. L.......................... .... .... -------- ------ .. .... ....
_j 7 L... ----
.......... L...........
L L--- 1 .... 1...
IL ...... ......... .... ...........
I------ ---- ---- ---- ------- --------
6 ........... .... .... ---
... ............. 4 --------- I---- ----- 4..... ......... .... .........
....- 7:,::... :::: ---
..... .......... ....- --------------- ---------- , i: .... 7::: ................ ......... - - - --------
t ---.................. .......... .... ........ ............... ....
5 :---------------
4 ..........
4 -
"---- -i-- ....... I
...".:'1""!" -"' "'i
" -+'--!...
---! -'-... .!- --- " "! '--! '"l "'!' '!' "t' '!
-"-"--!... . .. "" ".'" " ""' .. . ... i' '!- -'t' '!.".""': .'.' '."
....... .. " : "' ". . w..... w-
"..". -- .. ...- ' - -- . .. .* - --' - -: - - - -' - -r - -- - : - -:. . . .. --* - - -- - . .. . ." - -.r- - : - -*. . . .. - -- : - -.-- -
3 0 , . .
...!. ...---b..' 'i.i"" i "'! -i... .. .. -- --! -- !--
-!... .. ... b i -...
. . . . I
' "! "' .. .. .!4 " "- ........
--.... 7 ...."...
2 .......... .. . .... . . ..... .... ---- ----- ---------
4........ .... 4........... .......... .... 4 4...
........... I .......... .... ........ .... .......... I ........ --------
1 I.... ---
A ..I---------II -
4-------
0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Average Planar Exposure (GWD/MTU)
Exposure (GWd/MT) (kW/ft) 0.00 13.78 19.31 13.78 67.00 7.50 70.00 6.69 PAGE 13 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 6.1-1b. MAXIMUM AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION FUEL TYPE: GE14 15 .... ",- ÷..-..', .. . . .. .. '.- --*-------- - ----- --- " ---- - " -- " --- --. , ----:" '...
.... ....................... -. ----.... ........ . ..*..... ....... .. ---. --.. ...... ...-- --- I--- - ---.. .-. .---- - - -- --. .- . . - ----------- : .... ...---- - ---------
14 ........
i..
.... .-..... -- i----*----*--*--
....-. *....i.... ..... ........--.- .... ....i..... L.... 1......
.~
.... . .~~~~~~
~~- - --' - -.--. . .".... . . .- . - . . ...~~~ . . 4-.-- .. -'-
.. ..-... . -. .. . . .---- 4----- --*-- -.. -- -. -- - - . ... .....-. .. . . . . ........- I---* - - -
13 .-..
-i--- .'-------------
....... . .... i--*-* ...
i ii i
+-- -+....-
-i..... i i i !ý
- -.. ... i---
-i----------- ..*---
-.. --.. -----...... ..I-i - - ............. ---- - -- -* -
12 11
-. 4............
I.....+
+
4.............
.i. .
ý:....
i 10 i T ---T----
L.... ........ I .............
4-----
.... . ......... .. ......... ......... ................. ........ nmmm .... .... .... . ......... .......... -- ---- --
9 ..........
----------- I I..... .............. .................... ........ ..... .... ---- ----
8 ----
C, .......... -------- --------
---- ......I I 7 ---- - --------- ---------------
~1 - ------------
7 -----
- 0. ....... .....
6 ---- - ------- .... ............. .... - ---- ---- --- . ... ............
..............--------- ---- - .1 ---------- -------- ---------- --------
5 ............... .. ............. ......... .... ..... ........ ............... .... .......
... ............... .......... L............. i .... ........ ........ .... ..
- -r- -- .......... I---
- i ---... -.. ----
4 3 .... . ... ..... ......................... . .... ........ . ... .... .... .... . ... . ....7 ........... .... ........ . . .... .... .. .. ........
4--------- ........ 4-------- ---- ----- ------ ----- ------ 4----- ---- ----4---------
................ .... ... .... ......................... ........ ......I .... ........ ..... .... ....
1 ---- - --- ---- .. .. ---- ----------------- ........ ......... .... ............... .. -- - ----
...............J - .. ...... ......
.............. ........ L .........................
0 ................... ........... .... .... .
---ý -- i -------
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Average Planar Exposure (GWD/MTU)
AveagePlnr MALG ii Exposure (GWd/MT) (kW/ft) 0.00 12.82 16.00 12.82 21.10 12.82 63.50 8.00 70.00 5.00 PAGE 14 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 6.1-1c. MAXIMUM AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (MAPLHGR) VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE FUEL TYPE: ATRIUM-10 15 I ----*--i..
-:`:::::::wýwwww1wwwwýi i T
.. I... 4.. :.... ....- ---- ----
I..... .... ---- ----
14-13 l f I r
f 7.
I i
I r f Th~
I I I I I I I I 12 . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . .......... .... .... ....- ...7 ....7 .. r 1----7 ---7 ....
.... ...... : I 11 i
10
I ........
I------------
q16L ..............
i L L----
1----------
.... . .........i. -i ---------- T: ---- ---- ---- ---- - ---------- I
.............. --- 4........ 4----- 4----.... .... ....... ........ ......
i .... L ...............
..........1----- ---
L.... ....
- ---- ---- 7----
7 --- ----------
I
... ......... ......... ........ .... .... .... .... ........ I ....
1 : 7 - .... 1....---
... ----- --------- i ---- ---- ------ --- -------- ----- ---- ......
5 7 ----- --- ----- --------- 4.... .... 4 ........................ ........ ........
............ 1----L.... ........... iw... i ......... .... 1..... .... ...................... ...... -------- .........---- ----
.......... L ......... - --- ---- ---------- .... ....
6- .... ... ..... ------------------------- : : .---- .
-. -------------- . ---- ---- I . . .. -----
r ----
............. ........................... . ... .... .... ..... ......... L 5 .... ..................................
.......... ............... .......... .......... ......... .... ...................... ...........1.... ir........ 1----- r ...................TI ---- 1...
4 ..... .........
I..... ........
3 ----- I-..-
2 T 7 7.......... ..... ..........---------- ---------- ---- ------ --- --- ---- ....... ........ ---- -------------- ---
......... ......... .......... .............. .................. I
---------- -------- .... ....... ........ ---- 4
4 - ...... ...
1 ------------- ---- ---- ........ --------- ---- .... ........
0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Average Planar Exposure (GWD/MTU)
Average Planar MAPLHGR Limit Exposure (GWd/MT) (kW/ft) 0.00 12.81 18.90 12.81 23.88 12.81 70.40 7.30 PAGE 15 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.1-1. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE FLOW (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 -3 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC - EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2, GEI4, & ATRIUM-0 1.5-14.... ....... !
1.4 Loo 1.3 . -
C -Loop h 1.2 1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Core Flow (% Rated)
Loop Manual Loop Auto Core Flow Core Flow
(%) MCPRF (%) MCPRF 20.0 1.26 20.0 1.34 30.0 1.26 30.0 1.34 50.0 1.20 72.0 1.20 110.0 1.20 110.0 1.20 PAGE 16 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.1-2. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE FLOW (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4-7 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC - EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2, GEl4, & ATRIUM-0 1.5 I I LoolpAuto 1.4 .........
Loop Nlanual 1.3 IL rc-1.2 1.1 1.0 i~i I 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Core Flow (% Rated)
LooD Manual Loop Auto Core Flow Core Flow
(%) MCPRF (%) MCPRF 20.0 1.38 20.0 1.47 30.0 1.38 30.0 1.47 100.0 1.29 100.0 1.29 110.0 1.27 110.0 1.27 PAGE 17 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-4a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRP)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 2.8- ...... ... ..
2.6-2.4- >50%/o Flow 2.2-
<=50% Flow ........ .. ---------- -- --
- 0. 2.0-1.8- ....... ......
1.6-1.4- .... .. ...... ....
1.2- ---------------- ----------
1.0 p-s p 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Pov~er
% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.40 40.0 1.91 2.01 40.0 1.60 50.0 1.60 70.0 1.59 85.0 1.44 85.0 1.44 90.0 _ 1.39 100.0 1.33 PAGE 18 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-1b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GE14 I~P I 30v 2.8-2.6-
>500/ Flow 2.4-2.2-
<=50%/o Flow 2.0-1.8-1.6-1.4-1.2-1.0
- p 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.56 40.0 1.90 2.14 40.0 1.56 50.0 1.55 70.0 1.47 85.0 1.37 85.0 1.37 90.0 1.33 100.0 1.29 PAGE 19 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-1c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: I EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: ATRIUM-10 3.0 I -
2.8 2.6
............... >50% Flow 2.4 ..... ............
d...................
.............. < =5 0. w .Flo ..................
2.2 2.0 .. ................
1.8 1.6 ...................
1.4 1.2 1.0 p ~-
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Povwer
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.08 2.44 40.0 1.86 2.06 40.0 1.56 50.0 1.53 70.0 1.45 85.0 1.36 85.0 1.36 90.0 [ 1.33 100.0 1.30 PAGE 20 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-1d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRP)
APPLICATION CONDITION: I EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 I I I I -
2.8-2.6-2.4- >50% Flow 2.2-
<=50%/o Flow 2.0-1.8-1.6-1.4-1.2-1.0 *- I 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.40 40.0 1.91 2.01 40.0 1.66 50.0 1.66 70.0 1.59 85.0 1.47 85.0 1.47 90.0 1.43 100.0 1.38 PAGE 21 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-4e. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRP)
APPLICATION CONDITION: I EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GE14 3.0 I .1m 2.8 2.6
>50% Flow 2.4 2.2
<=50°/0 Flow 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 I mu I - I -
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.56 40.0 1.90 2.14 40.0 1.63 50.0 1.63 70.0 1.50 85.0 1.39 85.0 1.39 85.0 90.0 4
1.35 100.01 1.32 PAGE 22 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-1f. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: I EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: ATRIUM-10 3.0 p U 2.8-2.6-
>501% Flow .. . .................................... ..............
2.4-2.2-
<=50% Flow IL 2.0- .........................
1.8- . .......... .............. ... .... -
1.6- . ..............
1.4- ................ .....
............... ... ..d 1.2-1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.08 2.44 40.0 1.86 2.06 40.0 1.60 50.0 1.60 70.0 1.48 85.0 1.39 85.0 1.39 90.0 1.36 100.0 1.33 PAGE 23 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-2a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 I I 2.8 !...................
2.6 2.4 >50% Flow 2.2
<=500/6 Flow 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 p p 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.40 40.0 1.91 2.01 40.0 1.60 50.0 1.60 70.0 1.57 85.0 1.44 85.0 1.44 90.0 1.40 100.0 1.36 PAGE 24 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-2bK OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUELTYPE: GE14 AllU 1I 2.8-2.6
>50% Flow 2.4 2.2
<=50%/a Flow
,.2.0-1.8-1.6 ....
1.4-1.27 1 n- S p p I 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Povwer
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.56 40.0 1.90 2.14 40.0 1.56 50.0 1.55 70.0 1.48 85.0 1.41 85.0 1.41 90.0 1.38 100.0 1.35 PAGE 25 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-2c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRP)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUELTYPE: ATRIUM-10 3.0 2.8 2.6
>50%/ Flow .........
2.4 2.2
<=50%/ Flow 444%*
2.0 - ----------------
1.8 .......... .. ....................... .........
1.6 .......... .
1.4 1.2 1.0 I~p p
- 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.08 2.44 40.0 1.86 2.06 40.0 1.56 50.0 1.53 70.0 1.45 85.0 1.41 85.0 1.41 90.0 1.39 100.0 1.35 PAGE 26 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-2d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRP)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUELTYPE: GNF2 3.0-
- 2. ...............
2.8 ........
.. ............... i 2.6 2.424 ............ ........>500/o Flow 2.2
=50/ Flow 2.0.
1.8 . ...........
1.6 ..... ............
1.4.4. ........ .......... .....................
1.2-1.0 I I 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Fow >50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.40 40.0 1.91 2.01 40.0 1.66 50.0 1.66 70.0 1.59 85.0 1.50 85.0 1.50 90.0 1.47 100.0 11.42 PAGE 27 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-2e. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GE14 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.56 40.0 1.90 2.14 40.0 1.63 50.0 1.63 70.0 1.50 85.0 1.43 85.0 1.43 90.0 1.40 100.0 1.37 PAGE 28 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-2f. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: ATRIUM-10 3.0 I I -
2.8 2.6
>50%/o Flow . ........
2.4 2.2 2.0 =50D/o Flow 1.8 1.61 1.4-1.2-1.0 p-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.08 2.44 40.0 1.86 2.06 40.0 1.60 50.0 1.60 70.0 1.48 85.0 1.43 85.0 1.43 90.0 1.41 100.0 1.38 PAGE 29 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-3a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 I I m~I 2.8 2.6 2.4 >50%/a Flow 2.2
<=50%/o Flow 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 p 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.40 40.0 1.91 2.01 40.0 1.99 50.0 1.86 70.0 1.69 85.0 1.57 85.0 1.44 1 90.0 1 1.39 100.0 1.33 PAGE 30 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-3b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRP)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GE14 3.0 I - ! I I I -
2.8-2.6-
>50% Flow 2.4- ........ ......
a 2.2-
<=50D/o Flow .............
I. 2.0- .......... .. .................
1.8- .......................
1.6-1.4-1.2-1.0 I I 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.56 40.0 1.90 2.14 40.0 2.13 50.0 1.98 70.0 1.81 85.0 1.70 85.0 1.37 90.0 1.33 100.0 1.29 PAGE 31 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-3c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRP)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUELTYPE: ATRIUM-10 3.0 I I I -
2.8 ......
2.6
>500/ Flow 2.4 ....................
2.2
<=50D/o F*-w 2.0 ........... ..i....... .. ! ...............
1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 p
- 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(%Rated) <=50% RFo >50% Flow 23.8 2.08 2.44 40.0 1.86 2.06 40.0 2.04 50.0 1.90 70.0 1.72 85.0 1.62 85.0 1.36 90.0 1 1.33 100.0 1.30 PAGE 32 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-3d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 I I 2.8 2.6
....... .. ....... i
>500/6 Flow 2.2
=500% Flow 2.08 ----
1.8 ... .
1.61 1.4-1.2-1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Povter
/%Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.40 40.0 1.91 2.01 40.0 2.00 50.0 1.90 70.0 1.72 85.0 1.62 85.0 1.47 90.0 1.43 100.0 1.38 PAGE 33 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-3e. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GE14 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.56 40.0 1.90 2.14 40.0 2.13 50.0 1.98 70.0 1.81 85.0 1.70 85.0 1.39 90.0 1.35 100.0 1.32 PAGE 34 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-3f. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUELTYPE: ATRIUM-10 3.0 I I I -
2.8 ...............
2.6
>500/6 Flow 2.4 2.2 2.0 <=50%/a Flow 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2-1.0 -, - p- p p-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.08 2.44 40.0 1.86 2.06 40.0 2.04 50.0 1.90 70.0 1.72 85.0 1.63 85.0 1.39 90.0 _ 1.36 100.0 1.33 PAGE 35 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-4a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRP)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUELTYPE: GNF2 3.0 mm. ml mm. ~mm 2.8 2.6 2.4 ...>50%/o Flow ..........
2.2
<=50/o Flow 2.0 ........ .........
1.8 ..........
1.6 ...................
Nib-1.4 1.2 1.0 p~~ --- -Ip 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.40 40.0 1.91 2.01 40.0 1.60 50.0 1.60 70.0 1.57 85.0 1.44 85.0 1.44 90.0 1.40 100.0 1.34 PAGE 36 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-4b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GE14 3.0 I I I -
2.8 .... ....... - ------- - ----
2.6
>50% Flow 2.4 2.2
<=500/o Flow L2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Povwer
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.56 40.0 1.90 2.14 40.0 1.56 50.0 1.55 70.0 1.47 85.0 1.39 85.0 1.39 90.0 1.36 100.0 1 1.3 PAGE 37 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-4c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: ATRIUM-10 3.0 U I - U-
~~~
2.8 2.6
>50%/ Flow i !
2.4 2.2 2.0 ........... < = 0 F lo ....... .. ....
1.8 1.6 1.4
... ...... ..... . ... ....... . . . .. . .......... . .. ... .. .... .. ........ i.
1.2
..... ~ ~ ~~~ ~
1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.08 2.44 40.0 1.86 2.06 40.0 1.56 50.0 1.53 70.0 1.45 85.0 1.38 85.0 1.38 90.0 1.36 100.0 1.31 PAGE 38 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-4d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 -g Em 2.8 2.6 2.4 >50% Flow, 2.2
<=500/o Flow
-2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 -. p p-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Fow >50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.40 40.0 1.91 2.01 40.0 1.66 50.0 1.66 70.0 1.60 85.0 1.49 85.0 1.49 90.0 1.45 100.0 1.40 PAGE 39 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-4e. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GE14 3.0 I I I -
2.8 2.6
> 50%
2.4 2.2
<=500%
IL 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 .......................
1.2 1.0 I - P- - P 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(%Rated <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.56 40.0 1.90 2.14 40.0 1.63 50.0 1.63 70.0 1.52 85.0 1.42 85.0 1.42 90.0 1.38 100.0 1.35 PAGE 40 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-4 I. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRP)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: ATRIUM-10 3.0. p mm. -
2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2
- a. >50 Flo ....... . . ........ .... .........i........
2.0 --- ..-----
1.8 .
1.6 1.4 .
1.2 1.0 p- p- P I 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Pomr
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.08 2.44 40.0 1.86 2.06 40.0 1.60 50.0 1.60 70.0 1.50 85.0 1.42 85.0 1.42 90.0 1.39 1000 1.36 PAGE 41 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-6 a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRP)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUELTYPE: GNF2 3.0- I I 2.8 2.6
....>0/
o.ii Flo ---..........
2.4 .* .,...i .i
.i ... .
iii i 2.2 .. ...... . . . . ... . . .. . . ...... .. ... .. . .. .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . . ... . . .
C.
<0=5 ................... ....
1.8 .
1.6 .
1 4 . . ..........
1.2 1.0 I -
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.40 40.0 1.91 2.01 40.0 1.60 50.0 1.60 70.0 1.57 85.0 1.47 85.0 1.47 90.0 1 1.43 100.0 1 1.37 PAGE 42 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-5b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRP)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUELTYPE: GE14 3.0- I-2.82.8 .........
2.6
>50% Flow 2.4 2.2 2.0. =50% Flow 1.8 ......... .
.i .....
1.6-
- 1. ... .............. '
1.4.
1.2 -
1.0 I I 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% RFo >50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.56 40.0 1.90 2.14 40.0 1.58 50.0 1.55 70.0 1.48 85.0 1.43 85.0 1.43 90.0 1.41 100.0 1.36 PAGE 43 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-6c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: ATRIUM-10 3.0 I - I I I -
2.8-2.6
>5 F lw. ...........................................
>500/o Flow 2.4 2.2
- 0. <=50% Flow "
2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 p * ~-
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
/% Rated) <=50% RFo >50% Flow 23.8 2.08 2.44 40.0 1.86 2.06 40.0 1.59 50.0 1.54 70.0 1.47 85.0 1.43 85.0 1.43 90.0 1.41 100.0 1.36 PAGE 44 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-5d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2
.491-.E 2.8 2.6 2.4 >50% ............
2.2
<=50%
2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Pomer (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Ro >50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.40 40.0 1.91 2.01 40.0 1.66 50.0 1.66 70.0 1.60 85.0 1.52 85.0 1.52 90.0 1.49 100.0 1.43 PAGE 45 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-5e. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOCTO EOC FUEL TYPE: GE14 3.0-2.8 .
2.6 2.4 2.2 a-2.0- <
1.8 1.8 . ....
1.6-1.4 .
1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.56 40.0 1.90 2.14 40.0 1.63 50.0 1.63 70.0 1.52 85.0 1.46 85.0 1.46 90.0 1.44 100.0 1.39 PAGE 46 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-5f. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: ATRIUM-10 3.0 p I I I-2.8 2.6
>50% Flow 2.4 2.2
<=50% Flow 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 p -
0 10 20 30 -40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.08 2.44 40.0 1.86 2.06 40.0 1.60 50.0 1.60 70.0 1.50 85.0 1.46 85.0 1.46 90.0 1.45 100.0 1.40 PAGE 47 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-6a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 >50%/0 Flow, ... ....................
S w..........
2.2
<=50% Flow, 2.0 1.8 . ........ ...
1.6 1.4 ....... ......
1.2 1.0 -u p p p 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.40 40.0 1.91 2.01 40.0 1.99 50.0 1.86 70.0 1.69 85.0 1.57 85.0 1.44 90.0 1 1.40 100.0 1.34 PAGE 48 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-6b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUELTYPE: GE14 3.0 I I 2.8-2.6-
>50%/ Flow 2.4-2.2-
<=50%/ Flow 4%444 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4-1.2-1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(%Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.56 40.0 1.90 2.14 40.0 2.13 50.0 1.98 70.0 1.81 85.0. 1.70 85.0 1.39 90.0 1 1.36 100.0 1.31 PAGE 49 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-6c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUELTYPE: ATRIUM-10 3.0 I - I U - I - I U-2.8 2.6
>50% Flow 2.4 ..............................
... 5......
0 ....F. .......... .
2.2 2.0 *<=50% Flow -
1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 S S 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.08 2.44 40.0 1.86 2.06 40.0 2.04 50.0 1.90 70.0 1.72 85.0 1.62 85.0 1.38 90.0 1 1.36 100.0 1.31 PAGE 50 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-6d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRP)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 U p-2.8 2.6 2.4 > 50%/o 2.2-
<=500/0 2.0-1.8-1.6-1.4-1.2-1.0 p -
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(%Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.40 40.0 1.91 2.01 40.0 2.00 50.0 1.90 70.0 1.72 85.0 1.62 85.0 1.49 90.0 1.45 100.011 40 PAGE 51 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-6e. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GE14 3.0 2.8-2.6-
>50% Flow 2.4- ..............
2.2-
<=50% Flow 2.0 . ................-
1.8-1.6- ...... ........ --
1.4- .............
1.2-1.0 I 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.55 40.0 1.90 2.14 40.0 2.13 50.0 1.98 70.0 1.81 85.0 1.70 85.0 1.42 90.0 1.38 100.0 1.35 PAGE 52 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-6f. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: ATRIUM-10 3.0 2.8-2.6-
>50% Flow ................
2.41 2.2-
< =5 0 %/_F low 44,44, 2.0-1.81 1.61 1.4-1.2-1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.08 2.44 40.0 1.86 2.06 40.0 2.04 50.0 1.90 70.0 1.72 85.0 1.63 85.0 1.42 90.0 1.39 100.0 1.36 PAGE 53 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-7a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 I - I - I p-2.8 2.6 2.4 >50% Flow ..... ..............
2.2
<=50%/o Flow 2.0 . ..........
1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 - p p- p- p p 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Pomer
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.40 40.0 1.91 2.01 40.0 1.99 50.0 1.86 70.0 1.69 85.0 1.57 85.0 1.47 90.0 1.43 100.0 PAGE 54 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-7b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GE14 3.0 I Em 2.8-2.6-
>500/o Flow 2.4-
--- ii..
..... --- 5 ......
/ . F. lo- w--
2.2- .<,=50%/
! Flow
- L2.0 1.8-1.6- ...................
1.4-1.2-1.0 I- P- I *-
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 ,110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Fow >50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.56 40.0 1.90 2.14 40.0 2.13 50.0 1.98 70.0 1.81 85.0 1.70 85.0 1.43 90.0 1.41 100.0 1.36 PAGE 55 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-7c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUELTYPE: ATRIUM-10 3.0 I - U - I 2.8- . ...............
2.6-
>50% Flow 2.4- ............. .
2.2-
<=50%/oFlow 0.2.0-1.8-1.6-1.4- .......... ... ......
1.2-1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Pover
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.08 2.44 40.0 1.86 2.06 40.0 2.04 50.0 1.90 70.0 1.72 85.0 1.62 85.0 1.43 90.0 1.41 100.0l 1.36 PAGE 56 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-7d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRP)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0-2.8-2.6 2.424 ............ .
2.1 .... ......... <
2.2-2.0 1.81.8 ...........
1.6 . .................
1.4 ........ ....
1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Povmr
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.40 40.0 1.91 2.01 40.0 2.00 50.0 1.90 70.0 1.72 85.0 1.62 85.0 1.52 1*
90.0 1.49 100.0 1.4 PAGE 57 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-7e. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRP)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GE14 3.0 I I -
2.8-2.6-
>500/6 Flow 2.4- . .................. .
. 5 .0...F.... ...................
2.2- < =50% Flow 2.0 1.8-1.6-1.4-1.2-1.0 0 10 2D 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.56 40.0 1.90 2.14 40.0 2.13 50.0 1.98 70.0 1.81 85.0 1.70 85.0 1.46 90.0 1.44 100.0 1.39 PAGE 58 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-7f. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRP)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: ATRIUM-10 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 2.08 2.44 40.0 1.86 2.06 40.0 2.04 50.0 1.90 70.0 1.72 85.0 1.63 85.0 1.46 900 __ _ 1.45 1000 1.40 PAGE 59 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.1-1. LHGRVERSUS PELLET EXPOSURE (LHGR)
FUEL TYPE: ATRIUM-0 14
............... ---------- ........ ........ 4.... 4.......... 4.....
....4 .........
MEN momNEWEEMM 13 T ........ 1-----
....... ---- r ----
T ----------
12
.... I-----
........... -------- ..............7 .... 7...........
1..... 7-
.... 7 ----7.... r ......
I I.........i .................... ......... ---------
11
.............. t ......... ......... :..............
......... .... ........ L..... .............................
.......... . .... I .......... I....
........ ,,III
---------- 4
............... ......... 7 .........
7..... ----------- - ------- I ----------
10
................. I....- ---- ---
.............. N
. ........................ ............... .I......... ............ ..............
- I..... ....I 4 ..........
.......... ......... .... 4
..... ----------- ýT ----
--- ! i .....
- .4 .....
. . .... ..... 4...........
............... -------- ................... .... L----
.......... I
4----- -------------- ----
8
1 ..... ...............
- - --------- I .. ....
7 I
- ---- I.....: ----
6 I
.......... ......... --------------- I........
5 *Eli 00, 00im 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Pellet Exposure (GWdIMTU)
Peak Pellet Exposure LHGR Limit (GWd/MtU) (kW/ft) 0.00 13.40 18.90 13.40 70.40 7.30 1 PAGE 60 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.2-1. LHGR MULTIPUER VERSUS CORE FLOW (LHGRFACF)
APPLUCATION CONDITION: 1 -7 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC - EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2, GE14, & ATRIUM-10 1.1 1.0 0.9 U- 0.8
.-j 0.7 Loop Manual 0.6 0.5 Loop Auto 0.4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Core Flow (% Rated)
Loop Manual Loop Auto Core Flow Core Flow
(%) LHGRFACF (M) LHGRFACF 20.0 0-.65- 20.0 0.50 42.4 0.65 40.0 0.50 76.6 1.00 83.7 1.00 110.0 1.00 110.0 1.00 PAGE 61 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-4a. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 &4 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUELTYPE: GNF2 GNF2 1.1 4... ....... 1....,..7 ............ T... ý-7-7 ............ -----T--T ---
1.0 . . . . . . . . . . .
f ...i ... f -- --- --- --- ....... ... ...... ... ... ... ... ...... f---t 0.9 0~
us 4.i 0.7 501/6 Flow i!!,!!! L......L...
iiiiiiii
! 1 . . . . I......I.... I.... I.... ... I 4--*.. .........
-. - i--J--
A... . ........... ...... ---
0.6
..........................F . l
... " 5 0" / 'T"Te '- !- --- ---- ... ---
... .... T ] ....... .. ". " ........ I ........
- " ... .... "T .-....-....
" ....... * ' " " T -
0.5 . ----------
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Povmr
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 0.721 0.581 40.0 0.833 0.654 40.0 1.000 50.0 1.000 70.0 1.000 85.0 1.000 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 PAGE 62 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-1b. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 &4 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GE14 GE14 1.1 -2 1.0 *..- *. ....i . . ... . .i i :-...
.. i..... i .- . .. --- . .. .. .. -
... ...f. ... .... H.....
H ---...
... i -----
- - .......D.... iH... ... i. . . ...H ! !
...... ..... . ......i ...... i i i i i i .... . . ---- ..... . L...-
. .. L... ..L 0.9 -.-
' " ... ....L....... t."." ."... "
0,.
i.*...i_...Y._
i .... r *:...*
.... ..... t --- ---.. ..--...
.J
<=50%/n7~~~~~~------
Flow.'/ : ! : : :i[ :ii ........
..:i::iI::!:
n7
... ........... L................
0.6 >506 Flow 0.5 I I I I I I I I I I 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 0.747 0.609 40.0 0.854 0.710 40.0 1.000 50.0 1.000 70.0 1.000 85.0 1.000 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 PAGE 63 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-Ic. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 &4 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: ATRIUM-10 ATRIUM-10 1.1 1.0 0.9.
LL it 0.8 ...................
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Rob >50% Flow 23.8 0.760 0.613 40.0 0.878 0.690 40.0 1.000 50.0 1.000 70.0 1.000 85.0 1.000 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 PAGE 64 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-1d. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 &4 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUELTYPE: GNF2 GNF2
-. ~~~~
1.1 :~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~
--. .- ....------ i---+ :i::
---i-+: : -i, -i -i - -.:.......... ------ ...
... -----i ......iI---i i.........
-.. _ . _ _ _ .. . .. .. . . .: " --- ---1-- - - - - - -:. .. ". .
1.0 ..
.~ .
..t....
.i~ .. .
i.... ..
i..+-
..-.......... i!
......! t... ...L..
..L.. ...........
- i:,:i: :i::, i, ,',,,,,,,,,,,,,, , , , , , ,....., ... , , ' .., ., .,............... .. . .. . . ..... . ..
... ... +/- . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . .... . ....
0.9 4'--- 4 4- . .---.. .. . . . .4- . ---
. .. F -= ---- T ! !* --- --- .* . . *. . . * *. . . ... . . .* . *. .! . !. . * . -. i. -. F. . . !. ... ." -. !
- : :..*.. ..'.. .: ..- .i... ,...i ..*-. *..." ..... _.-.-.-..-
-i .~...:..~ i - ------ iT i=
u.
_ ... .- . :.. ..,. .* . .. .. . . * .- .,. ------.. . ÷.--.. __... .... ... . ..---- .. ---.. *.._._...:... . *..... * .........* ._.-!_* _;... ...L *L... ...*..
... I.--_ _.,..
S0.8 ..*...*...,,_
-J ..i......... t.... .. .. ........ ....... .. ....i i l i i ...i i i t i ~ i~
0.7
- - 4 - .. .. --- ---* -.... .. i --i --i --* . ...
---**--- ... i- .-- ... i- - - .-.-.......... ----*----- . . .---------
i 44,.i .5o% - , -.,.., , ,.,., .,....... , ...... .. ----- , ,.... --. -.-- -- - , --- .... ,
L.i . . ._. _i .i .L . ... .......
i.... *...i...i..... .. .. . .. .... .i .. .
50!! ., ..... ..,..' .. i ! !
- i ,
- i i i
- 0.6
, , ,, , -------- .... '-T- ,-- 'li T~ - **-,,,....," !i ...
... -- *--,--, ........ "-i ----* -*...........-.
0.5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Ro >50% Flow 23.8 0.721 0.581 40.0 0.833 0.654 40.0 1.000 50.0 1.000 70.0 1.000 85.0 1.000 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 PAGE 65 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-4e. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 &4 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUELTYPE: GE14 GE14 1.1 7--- --- --- --- --- --- -----
I------
---I--
r -- ------------------ ... ... ...... ... ... r ... ... ... ... --- --4---4-- -------
1.0
... L-- ------- ---
i---f---i--- --- ---.......... ... ... ........ ------ ... ...
0.9 L L..! ... .... ... ... ......................
.. ... .... --- --- ------;--4 --- --- --- --- ----------- --- ....... ... .... ...4------- --- ------4-------
u- 0.8 C,- Or.
--- -- ------- --- --- ...... 4---
........... 0 .. ... ... ... ... ....... ... ... ----------- --- -----
50% F 000.
0.7 0.6 i >50% F- 1 . .. .. . . . ... .. .. . ... .. . .. . .
T--- T i --- --- r -- -------- --- --- --- ---------------
0.5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Po~er
(%Rated) <=50% Ro >50% Flow 23.8 0.747 0.609 40.0 0.854 0.710 40.0 1.000 50.0 1.000 70.0 1.000 85.0 1.000 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 PAGE 66 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-1f. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 1&4 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: ATRIUM-10 ATRIUM-I0 1.1
" -- "T ---- ---a " ---- --- -------
-.. ..I "-- "."-."'
1.0 T... .... -.. T -T..
...- T-T - --...--..
........ ... . r--T
.. ....... - ---....... T... ...
..... ....... [ T T I
-1
- I--
i - i - I ..
, .. . .--- ,---,------I --- --- I. .. ----
0.9 i... ... ....... iii... .......
W.
ii ii iiF -- ...--- - "-- ' ' " "'-" ..... ....'-' " -- ' ' "....."-"-"-" .......... - ..............
. . i. . -.. .. ....
C.,
TIT IF[ t....,, ,,, ,,, ,,....... .. ...F. FT --- ....---..... I..r~
r..... .....
- 0.8
-j
~
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit~~~iiiiiiiiiii-
~
iiiii~
~Z
-ti i -il--- -- -- -- ----- -
--- ii i-ii ii ii----- -------
it-----
iiii iiii~ iiiiii
-- --- ,-- -,-,i,, ,-,,--- ,, ,-- ,,i,i,i..
- ~
0.7 ! i i
< = ; 0 / : F: low:. - ........ .... ...... !----- ---- , ! .,....!!
0.6
>50% F% Rwed 0.5 Power
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 0.760 0.613 40.0 0.878 0.690 40.0 1.000 50.0 1.000 70.0 1.000 85.0 1.000 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 1.000
- I - a-PAGE 67 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-2a. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 GNF2 1.1 -
i t ---t -"----- -----h-- h *----?- "-" .... - .....
- h i ...... .....- h * ..... . ....
.hh....
.*h.. ...... ...4.. 4
"'i'"i'"i'".i i ....
.-. ... i 'TTT -- ---- -T T........
.~T i..TT.
..T. ..T: ~ i~
1.0- -i----!-i T T--..i------------- --- ---. i i- -- T T -TTT-... --...
-.. T- ~T T l-i- F T.TT T TT ..
i ~ ~ ...... ..! ...... ---- -_ ------ ------ ....... ! ! , i '
..__L
]i_
...i.
...ii..L~...-iL---.i.......;..!...i .. I.... .... . ........ - ----- I.-- .... -i..-.. ..---. ....
. ...... .. ..... .....i... ......i...... i....
0.9-
- --------------=.. -------
I-.-.--
.......... ...... ... F [ : i ! - -
- F [ T- T T ! ... [' I -i- * [.. . '[ !"' :"T' ! " '"i l iz0.8- - -*---
I.4-- --- - . - - - - - I - * - - - , - - - . . . . . .... .* . . ..-. ------ ---- -- ----
_1
........ < 50/6 l, /.... i "1w. ......:,,"- ... ..... ......L. L-......- ---...----. ....
... i L...
i Li 0.7 I I L.. ...
0.6 , , r , i T , r f
........>50%- Flow ..
-I --":'":'":"T'"
ii-i--::--
0.5- 1~
T 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Povwer
(% Rated) <=50% Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.721 0.581 40.0 0.833 0.654 40.0 0.999 50.0 1.000 70.0 1.000 85.0 1.000 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 PAGE 68 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-2b. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GE14 GE14 1.1
.. ........... .... ... I i ... .......7 . T i --- ... ... .....
- - - - - ----- ---- - -- - - ---- - - - - ----- --- --- ------ ... ... ... ... --- --- --- --- ... ..I... --------
T i
--T ------ --- --- --- -- --- --- ... ...
- - - - - ---- ----- - ---- - T 4-4 ... ...
1.0 L- i ... ..
I
... ....... .. . ... .... . ..- 1---1 .............I
.... 1------I---I ...........
....... ........ L ...... ........... ... ... L------
....... ... ... L... ............
... ....... ------ 1 --- --- ............... ...t -- --- --
0.9
I ... ... ý--4 4 T--- -- --- ---
4...... -. 4 4....... 4--- --- ------ --- --- ... ...;--4 ------------ ...........
-4............
S0.8 ................... ...... 7 --- --- ....... ........ 1 I------ ... ...
5
<=50D/6 Flow.- ------- --- 7 --- r- 1 ...... I
...... ........... L-I..; ... ... L... ... L... L..; ... ... I ...
0.7 ... ... ....... ... ...... ... ....... ..
i --- ... ... I r--! ... ... r --- - -
i >501/o Flow f T........
I I I 11H H H, 0.6 ...............
--- --- I 4----
0.5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Pov~er
(% Rated) <=50% Fow >50% Flow 23.8 0.747 0.609 40.0 0.854 0.710 40.0 1.000 50.0 1.000 70.0 1.000 85.0 1.000 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 PAGE 69 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-2c. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: ATRIUM-10 ATRIUM-10 1.1
... ... ------ ...... ....... ...... ... ... I ------
1.0 1 1--- ---
f ... ..................... i...i .. ...i ... ...... ......
....... ... ...... L....... L... L.. ... ... L...L............
L............. --- -------
0.9 4-------
4---4 ------------- --------------- I
.......... ....... ...... --- ------------- I
--- --- -------- ... ... 7.
T. .
- u. -- ------------ ...... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ----------------------
C,S0.8 ----------- --- ------- ------ ---
........ 1 ... ... ....... .......... ... ... ---
.-J i--- i... ... ... ...
<= 50%. Flow --------- -- i... --- .....................
0.7
>50% Fl- ------------- ------------
0.6
- -- --- --- I
------- --- I..
--- - - --- ------ .......... L 1... ... .......
0.5 ........
I 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 0.760 0.613 40.0 0.878 0.690 40.0 1.000 50.0 1.000 70.0 1.000 85.0 1.000 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 PAGE 70 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-2d. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 GNF2 1.1 "i"
"'*'" * ?!---...............
"* "," " 1 "... "! ...
'= "* "---
1-.
" -- 4" ! " '
! -- ------*---F---.---- *- -------
--- --- - l .... " "... " ""
1.0
- .-- . !.... - - -- - T .!...... -.------- : - ----, ..... , . - . - - -- -..t. *... .. .. .. - - __ _ _ . . . .. .. . * .
.. T.. i i !.... .. i
. . . . . . . . .~~~. . . . . ........
"--"-":' rT" ':r....rlr," -- --- ..... .....
.. ...f. . ......... . ..
0.9 0.
o: 0.8 0
53 "Iiilii ..l:. . .. .. I.....
I III III ".1*'- "....... ..:...
. ... . ... *. . .a..; I. .... -- =L-- ' ..
... -=
.L..;L..: ... * .. =L..=.-=... ' .--;---
0.7 .... "....:. ..:.4 .. _ . .L _ ............. , ._..... .. L.i._ 4.._.
.... L:....... L ... __ __... .. ....... L.' . ...]. .... :..* _ :_"
I... .._.... .... ...
0.6 0.5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Pow~er
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 0.721 0.581 40.0 0.833 0.654 40.0 0.999 50.0 1.000 70.0 1.000 85.0 1.000 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 PAGE 71 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-2e. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GE14 GE14 1.1 4... 4...4...4...... -. 4.... ... ... ....... --------------- ----------- ------ --- .......
--- --- --------------------- --- --- ------- --- ------- --- ---i --- i- 7 7 i ---
1.0 i -----
1 f--- ... ... ...
..... L.- L L..; ...I...; ... 1---L------- L--- L--ý... ------ ------------... .. ....
............. --- --- --- --- --- I... .. ........
0.9
........... ....... :...I ...L....... L... L..; ... ...... ... ... ...... ........ ............
CL ............ ... ....I ... ...... ... 4-4 ---4---------------------- -
~0.8 U.
C,, .. ...... . ... ...... ............... ...... ...... . ------- --- ------- r--i ------
-J --------------- ... ... ...... :
........ ... .......L I---- ---I 50D/. F ... ... -- ----------------- ------ ------- -------... ... ---------------
0.7
.......... ........L --- --- ------- ------------------ ............... ... ............
j---------
--- .................. --- --- ....... ............ ... I
.......... --- ------4 ...... 4: ...... ------ I 0.6 > 50% Flov. -------
4---
... .. ------------- ------- ----------- ...... ........... -------------- I------
4------ ---- ----- -- --- --- ...... ------ ------ ...... 4 --------------
0.5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Ro >50% Flow 23.8 0.747 0.609 40.0 0.854 0.710 40.0 1.000 50.0 1.000 70.0 1.000 85.0 1.000 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 PAGE 72 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-2f. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: ATRIUM-10 ATRIUM-0 1.1 1.0 TT ..... T .......
!!~~~
.....- T- *
~
T---.......
~
T
~ ...........
~
i......
~
T ...
~~~~.
- I:::
TT 0.9 0.8
.... I.-.... ----------- ---- ----- iiiiiiiii ST i i -- -- --I r- i -- -- -- _7i --
0.7
............ 0 ---
40
60
................ .. ..........10..
Pow (%e R--a-t-e----d---)----
0.6 0.5 Power
(%Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 0.760 0.613 40.0 0.878 0.690 40.0 1.000 50.0 1.000 70.0 1.000 85.0 1.000 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 PAGE 73 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-3a. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACP)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3,6 &7 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUELTYPE: GNF2 GNF2 1.1 i iiiiit 1.0 0.9 U.
0.8 0.7.
I 0.6.
05 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.721 0.581 40.0 0.833 0.654 40.0 0.676 50.0 0.726 70.0 0.744 85.0 0.843 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 PAGE 74 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-3b. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3,6 & 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUELTYPE: GE14 GE14 1.1
. .'?
. ?' --- P ~ -i-t----------
-I-iI-I
---.. .......i Ii....... i--- ---.. ~.......... ... ...........I-......-----
T- ..... ... i T --..... i - ...i T T :-T i............. ..... ............ .. ....... i ~ ...T T 1.0 I'"T "i~~~~~~~~~~~~
" T ,-T .....-.
- "'F I": , T TT !....IT T... T " .. . ! L"
........ "--l ... .... i '" ... ...............
0.9 S0.8 U-0.8
.!..i ..
L.J.. .. ... ...... ..
.. ..- '_ L.. ............r . ..........
L~........... L .._... . i...i.i.i.
0.7
-i-T T! .......- T TT -T-T- .....- T T .......
IT ---.. - TT----.. - T--....... . . .T
.4T T..
~ ~
-!-T"!*~ ?:'T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~.
T:"F .... T-FF TTT .....T TT...... ...
T--... T'F....
... .. -F"" ....... - "-- -- ..... -------
0.6 0.5
.0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(%Rated) <=50% Ro >50% Flow 23.8 0.747 0.609 40.0 0854 0.710 40.0 0.739 50.0 0.785 70.0 0.861 85.0 0.905 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 PAGE 75 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-3c. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3,6 &7 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: ATRIUM-10 ATRIUM-10 1.1 1.0 0.9 4---i4----
o~-4---
0.7 0.6 4---!---i---1 0.5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(%Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 0.760 0.613 40.0 0.878 0.690 40.0 0.713 50.0 0.766 70.0 0.846 85.0 0.889 90.0 1.000 1000 1.000 PAGE 76 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-3d LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3,6 &7 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 GNF2 1.1 1.0 0.9 9L 0.8 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Ro >50% Flow 23.8 0.721 0.581 40.0 0833 0.654 40.0 0.655 50.0 0.714 70.0 0.732 85.0 0.835 90.0 1.000 100.0 1 1.000 PAGE 77 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-3e. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3, 6 &7 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GE14 GE14 1.1 10 7" "'7"! ---------
... f ...T...
.................. r -- --- 7---
7... -- I---- --T- --- ---W--- .......... 7-.i ... ... ... ........I ..........
10 a
~.
0.9 .... ........
I ......... .... ......... .......
... ............... ... ... ...... ------ ... ... ...... ... ............... ...... L...
4---4--- --- ........... -------------- --- --- --- --- --- ------ 4 4-------
T ...:
- 0. ...4--- 4...4...
... .................. 1.
I....,.. ... ... --- --- ...... --- -------
<= 50% F low ---------
0.7 ... ..................... ... .......
7 T i
>50D/O Flow 0.6 I-------------
--- - -- I---
0.5 0 10 20 4.............
30 40 50 60 i 70 80 90 I I I I 100 1 I I I I 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% RFo >50% Flow 23.8 0.747 0.609 40.0 0.854 0.710 40.0 0.711 50.0 0.758 70.0 0.845 85.0 0.885 900 1_000 100.0
-~~~ ~~ . .
000____4 1.000 p.
- I- i -
PAGE 78 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-3f. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3,6 &7 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: ATRIUM-10 ATRIUM-10 1.1
- -------- ...... ... ... 1,
.-- -------- . ...... ... ... --- --- --- --- ---:__4------------------ -------
4--- 4...... ...... ... ... .......... --- --- ---------- --------------- ---------------------
1.0 L...
........... ...... L...
Z.......L... ... . ...
.............. ...... ...... ...... ... ... --- ---- --- --- ........ - .1-
.... --- --- ... ...I 0.9 4 - .4 ...4 4- -
-- ---------- --- --- I---.,--;---
4--- ---4---
ý--4--- 4 -- 4---4...
a1.
-T.7 LL
- 0.8 I<= 509/6 Flow ..........
... .... .... .... ..Z ........
L......L....... ... ...1... L........
0.7 -':.......................
... .... .... L........
L....... ... ... ... ....................
-- 4 4--- 4--- 4... ...... 1.
........ ...... I
....... -----4
4...
>50D/o I 0.6
- ----- ...... ........ .......---------- -- ... I
------ ---- --------- --- ------- --------I -----------
T-- 7 I ....... ..... L........
0.5 0 10 2D 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 0.760 0.613 400 0.878 0.690 400 0.691 50.0 0.753 70.0 0.835 85.0 0.881 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 PAGE 79 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0
-FIGURE 8.3-4a. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 GNF2 1.1 --
i!---4
-,- -----t-- - .--- .- .---
. . .. .. ... t...---
!-i--.. . . Ti ..------
.i-- ---... ........"i -------- . . . . .-- ....
. . . . .---.i-
-.t-
---i----!........
T-!--I~y ! ;!----!-!--TY Y ! F ** * *T T i---!--- F . , i ---.. !.... :----
....-- TT-Y -
--*..---H --H --H --H --
--H--i-.*.-t--*--H i . .-_--------
-- H.... H------ --.... ---H ---.... --. . ............... -- ...---.......--
1.0
--4---
4 ---. .....--
..-... ..H--!----
-- q* --.. .-. .*. -- -- .* - - -' - - -t..-.-
.. - ..... i- -..... "--- --- --i . , -, ... -- -...--
.-.. -..... . ... --- H---.----.--- . . . . ---!-i-----i------ --....... ...-- .-H. .--. ........--
. .-.- --- -- H--.--.-
0.9 0.8
.......... --i- . -T...
-YYY"Y Y'/F --F-F F F!F'7"g TF ':"'
Y F-
-FF
~ ......r""T""
""F vY7-."--*
- 4. . . . . .
........ ..... : ,r Y"Y"]
f .. . .. .. . . ... ..
'7...
....'...."T.". ".
,, . ,- ------. -. -- . .--. ---. . --- ! ----. - - -., i i.- - - - --.. '. . .....
0.7 *~~~~~ ! .T T * ,. T ..... T [ [----.. [ .. *L [u.;.......................!i 11 1 1
~~~~. ,---...
0.6
. .... ,... I..... - .---
....... J ... . . .. -;-- - ---
4-4-H H-- ------ ,----
- ------..--------- ---- - -H - ........ ...-- H-- ---------- ------- H .- .---- -- --.---.-
........ .. . 0 / F lo ; i ' ; i T ; .. .... ; i [ [ [ i 0.5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Pover (% Rated)
Power
% Rated) <=50% Ro >50% Flow 23.8 0.721 0.581 40.0 0.833 0.654 40.0 0.968 50.0 0.999 70.0 1.000 85.0 1.000 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 PAGE 80 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-4b. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GE14 GE14 1.1 1.0 1.o............
-J - ----
0.9 C, 0.8
.L....- -..... I.
0.7
.0.6 --4-.... 4-05ii5 0 10 2D 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
P0wer
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 0.747 0.609 40.0 0.854 0.710 40.0 1.000 50.0 1.000 70.0 1.000 85.0 1.000 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 PAGE 81 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-4c. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: ATRIUM-10 ATRIUM-0 1.1 4---4...4...... 4........... ... 4
... ............ --- --- --- --- ý--4---4--- ---4 ý--4 ---------------- --
7-7" T T-7 --- ---
T ------- 7--- --- --- ------- -7.7
...r ...
1.0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
............. --- --- ........... ...... ............... L-L --- -------j ...
I-L-0.9
.7 ... ---Y ----- ....... ............ ... ... ------------ ........
- 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . -------------- ý--4---4--- ---4--- --------- 4 4-------
C, .. 4----------------- -- ------------------ -- -- -- -- --- --- --- ----------- -- ------- --------- -
- 0.8 1
........ 50/. Flow ...............
--- ... ... ... ... L....... L... L..; ...
0.7 i.- ........ ... ------- --- --- --- --- --- ... ... --- --- --- --- --- ---------- ----------- ------
.................. --- --- -----------...--- --- ------- --- --------- i--- i--- ---i--- ... ...........---
L..; ... ... ... L... L... .. ........
--- --- --- --- ------ -------I---r-7 --- i --- ---4 4---4--------- -
>50D/o Fl-
.0.6
-- ... ... .. .... ... ... -------- 7-7 1------ 7 ---------
T --- -- :
............... ...L ......................
........... ...... i .............. .......
0.5 0 10 2D 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 0.760 0.613 40.0 0.878 0.690 40.0 1.000 50.0 1.000 70.0 1.000 85.0 1.000 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 PAGE 82 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-4d. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 GNF2 1.1 -
r .......T-- z- r ...
r ... ......
... ......... ...... ------ ...... ------ ------ ------I .........
I 1.0.
........... ....... .4 ... .......
...... ------I 0.9-L.........
L... :
t,,.i.-
a.
i[iiiiill
- "U- 0.8- . .! ' , i AF - E
- aI .............i
.. 50 F ....-.
0.7 L 1... .........
....... 1...L...
Z....................
4...
0.6- i i . . . . . III 5 pq
... .E
.IE n .I ...
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(%Rated) <=50%Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.721 0.581 40.0 0.833 0.654 40.0 0.968 50.0 0.999 70.0 1.000 85.0 1.000 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.00 PAGE 83 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-4e. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERS US CORE POWER (LHGRFACP)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GE14 GE14 1.1 1.0Ll_ . ...
_ _..i~
i _!___+/-
.........i.LLi! . ::.. . ..- . - i ' i ! +/-....... _'........ . .... ........ .....
"!""!"'-t --t '-,--!'".*'"!'". -! " - ,-- ...."'"
."! .. '""-'------"'" ---... .."'. 1 '.::.. .. '". ! '" ....... " ' "". .. ......" b ! " ' b ! " " ! '
.J...__J.. ..! .. .
..L_. . i . _ i _ L.... [..
... .. . L. I ... . " ......
-..-.-. L.. ; -.;L . "._ _ __.
. ... .... L..... L.. ....... .... L_ L _ . L . . L... .. ...].
0.9~ *~i I~: ~: i ~ ! ~! ]~ i ------ , i : : i ] :
- i ].! iI. ! : : ... ......
] : . . .:.... .I... ..... . !!
- - *.-` ! . r .`. * ----1-.-
.-------- `.-------
-- - --. t -- ...* . ... -.-.-..- - -- - ---*-----..-.. . .- *. ------ - -----r . . .- --- !- !. . . - [ -! - - '.- ' - * - :-
0.
.- -I --.
C, U-(.9
- ~ ~ / . ,---1--: ....... .. .. : ; : : : : ; : I : '
".!... ,,-- !- = ----
. ........b ! ... .... !
0.~6~ ;o,;.oL* ~ ~ ~ ~~~~0 iiii.~i ......H !.. . ] ... ... i .........i. . . iil...----- ------ ......ii i........i
' i !--- ---- ---i - i 0.--- t-i--i
.-.-- !----- -- . . . ..... -i ....b i i ! b i ! - ! i
] ]L.-
')) ))-]--]-* [ FF[* ] ~ i i T....[ ~ i
.....i-i-i-- !.. ... ... ..L..... .. ......
............... *T * *.****.** *i****!*Y **[*T*]*... ****!*T *.......IT] T ] [
... . .....-..- ] (( ]i]
' - ---------- T -----T T .....
-- [ --------- T T ! ! TT .... '. .......... r ' -.------ - - ---- - --- -----
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 0.747 0.609 40.0 0.854 0.710 40.0 1.000 50.0 1.000 70.0 1.000 85.0 1.000 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 PAGE 84 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-4f. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: ATRIUM-10 ATRIUM-0 1.1
... ... -- --------I .... . ... ....... ...
7... 7... r..i ...7 1.0 0.9
-- 4---4---4 4------- -- - -------- --- --- --- --- --------- --4 --- --- 4... ...4. ... .... ...
4............
U. -----------
... ... ----- -- -- - - --------- ------ ---b . . .. . . . . . ... . . .... . ------ ---------- ----------- --- ---
S0.8
r ------- ---
5M. Flow L L..ý... ........... ... ... ...... ... ... ....... ...........I
........... ... ... ... ... ... ........ - 1.................... L... L..!
... L....... .................
0.7
--- --- --- --- ... i ý.A L............ L..; ... ... ... ......Z... L............ L.-;
4------
--- --- --- ---- ý 4, 4--- --- ---4 ... ........ -4... ... 4---4--- - - 11
>50% Flow
.0.6
. 1 .... i ...
0.5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
(% Rated) <=50% Row >50% Flow 23.8 0.760 0.613 40.0 0.878 0.690 40.0 1.000 50.0 1.000 70.0 1.000 85.0 1.000 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 PAGE 85 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 Figure 9.1-1: Monitored Region Boundary (Case 1) 120 110 100 90 80 16.
70 WJ 60 0(. 50 w
W 40 0V 30 20 10 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 CORE FLOW (% rated)
PAGE 86 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 Figure 9.1-2: Monitored Region Boundary (Case 2) 120 110 100 90 "80 (D 80 V 70 LU 60 0
I. 50 LU I 40 0
30 20 10 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 CORE FLOW (% rated)
PAGE 87 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 Figure 9.1-3: APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted Region Boundary (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1) 120 1 10 ..............
100 ..............
9o 80
- 70 UJ 60 0
C.
wu 50 0
40 30 20 10 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 ALIGNED DRIVE FLOW (% rated)
PAGE 88 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 Figure 9.1-4: APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted Region Boundary (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2) 120.
110 - . ...-
100 9.0 0
8x w 60..
0 M0 0
o 40 +--FS T T
0 10 20: 30 40 50 60 .".70 10 90 100 110 1120 AUGNED DRIVE FLOW (%.rated)
PAGE 89 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 Figure 9.1-5: APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted Region Boundary (Single Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1) 120 110 .............
10 0 .............
90 80 70 0
60 0
a.
LU 60 0
C, 40 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 ALIGNED DRIVE FLOW (% rated)
PAGE 90 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 Figure 9.1-6: APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted Region Boundary (Single Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2) 120 110 100-90 so, o.0 '
0 0.40 FS 0: :10 . 20 30 40 50o 60 ,70 80 90 -100 110 '120 ALIGNED DRIVE FLOW (% rated)
PAGE 91 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 Figure 9.1-7: APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1) 120 110 -. -.------ ---------................... ................... ................... ..................................... .. ................. ....................
iiiiiiiiii... l...
iii i...
ii..
iii iiiiiiii 0....................
8o.
900 . ..................
iii .. .....
70° ----------- ............ ............ ...... .... ... .... .... ............ --------
80 0.
I~................. ..... .... .. . ....... .......... A llow able V alue ........... .................. ....................
ILi S Setup Rod-Block LL.I 0 ...... ........ .... .... .... ....---- ---- --.. ........ ........... .... ....---- ---- -..----- ---- ---- --- .--- .....
0NS n* Non-Setup Rod-Block 10 20 - 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 ALIGNED DRIVE FLOW (% rated)
PAGE 92 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 Figure 9.1-8: APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2) 120.
90
-:80 0.
LU 60.
0 U3 0
- 0. 40 0f "10 .20 30 40 s0 60 70 0" 90 100 110 120 ALIGNED DRIVE FLOW (% rated)
PAGE 93 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 Figure 9.1-9: APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Single Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1) 120-110,. .
1 10 - ..----------------- .................
8 0 -.-- ---..............
90
,ZNominal Value 100............... ......... . ........ ... .a. .......
14J 60 ---------- ................ A lowa le Va u ........... .................. --................
0 s Setup Rod-Block o
0NS
/S Non-Setup Rod-Block 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 ALIGNED DRIVE FLOW (% rated)
PAGE 94 OF 95
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 17 Revision 0 Figure 9.1-10: APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Single Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2) 120.- A.
J*: I> I,: I,.L I IJ L. J ,
110.;--[--j---t---,---r-------Il---------:,--
- 980 I I I I I...
WO Ci 0 1 1r ,,7 +
F...
- + -- :--4-- -+
.o i* I, : * ?i **
,0-
.1.0. 20 30 40 . 60 '70 ST 90 100 110o 1,2 0
ALIGNED DRIVE FLOW ( rated)
PAGE 95 OF 95