RBG-46965, Submittal of Sixteenth Fuel Cycle Core Operating Limits Report

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submittal of Sixteenth Fuel Cycle Core Operating Limits Report
ML093000116
Person / Time
Site: River Bend Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 10/21/2009
From: Lorfing D
Entergy Operations
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
References
RBG-46965
Download: ML093000116 (73)
v • d • e


Text

Entergy Operations, Inc.,

Entergy River Bend Station 5485 US. Highway 61 N St. Francisville, LA 70775 Tel 225-381-4157 David N. Lorfing Manager, Licensing October 21, 2009 RBG-46965 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555

Subject:

River Bend Station - Unit 1 Docket No. 50-458 License No. NPF-47 Sixteenth Fuel Cycle Core Operating Limits Report (COLR)

Dear Sir or Madam:

Enclosed is Revision 0 of the River Bend Station (RBS) Core Operation Limits Report (COLR) for the sixteenth fuel cycle. This report is submitted in accordance with Technical Specification 5.6.5 of Appendix A of the Facility Operating License NPF-47.

There are no commitments in this letter.

I For further information, contact myself, David Lorfing at (225) 381-4157.

Sincerely, Manager, Licensing River Bend-Station - U DNL/bmb

RBG-46965 Page 2 of 2 cc: Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 612 E. Lamar Blvd.,, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 NRC Senior Resident Inspector P. 0. Box 1050 St. Francisville, LA 70775 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Mr. Alan B. Wang MS 0-7 D1 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Mr. Jeffrey P. Meyers Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Office of Environmental Compliance Attn. OEC - ERSD P. O. Box 4312 Baton Rouge, LA 70821-4312

Core Operating Limits Report Cycle 16 Revision 0

Page 1 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 RIVER BEND STATION, CYCLE 16 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT (COLR)

PREPARED BY: Thomas W. Oliphant* Date:

Responsible Engineer REVIEWED BY: Phu V. Vo* Date:

Uaowiaw F*na inaor APPROVED BY: Frederick H. Smith Date: /V -P 0 Manager - Nuclear En~ginVng APPROVED BY: Dennis P Wiles* I (

  • Date:

Director, Engineering River Bend Nuclear Station APPROVED BY: Date:

On-Site Safety Review Committee River Bend Nuclear Station

Page 2 of 44 RBS CYCLE 15 COLR Revision 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION AND SUM M ARY .......................................................................... 3 CONTROL RODS .......................................... ..... 4 TECHN ICAL SPECIFICATION 3.2.1 ...................................................................... 5 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 3.2.2 ....................................................................... 6 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 3.2.3 ....................................................................... 7 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 3.2.4 ....................................................................... 8 TECHN ICAL SPECIFICATION 3.3.1.1 .................................................................... 9 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 3.3.1.3 .......................................................... 10 TECHNICAL REQUIREM ENT 3.3. 1.11...............................

................................... II TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT 3.3.2.1 ............................... 12 REFERENCES/ANALYTICAL METHODS DOCUMENTS ................................... 13 TABLE 1. ALIGN ED DRIVE FLOW ....................................................................... 15 APPENDIX A - OPERATING LIMITS FOR EQUIPMENT OUT OF SERVICE OR LO OP MAN UAL M O DE ...................................................................................... .36

Page 3 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 INTRODUCTION AND

SUMMARY

This report provides Cycle 16 values for thefollowing Technical Specifications:

1. AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (APLHGR) limits,
2. MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPR) limits,
3. LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (LHGR) limits,
4. FRACTION OF CORE BOILING BOUNDARY (FCBB),
5. REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM (RPS) APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Allowable Values,
6. REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM (RPS) APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power time constant.
7. PERIOD BASED DETECTION SYSTEM (PBDS) region boundaries.

Technical Specification section 5.6.5 requires these values be determined using NRC-approved methodology and are established such that all applicable limits of the plant safety analysis are met.

The references for the pertinent methodology used by GNF are listed in the section titled Analytical Methods Documents.

This report also provides Cycle 16 values for the following Technical Requirements:

1. REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM (RPS) APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux Power - High Allowable Values and Nominal Trip Setpoints',
2. CONTROL ROD BLOCK INSTRUMENTATION APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux High limits.

The Cycle 16 COLR supports power operation with FHOOS, FFWTR, PROOS, SLO, EOC-RPT, and TBOOS INOPERABLE and Loop Manual Operation.

The reload analyses were performed in accordance with GNF methodology and its applicability to Cycle 16 was confirmed by Reference 1.1.

Note that for Figures 4 to 11,'the Nominal Setpoints should be used for indicating the entry into a particular stability region as allowed and appropriate actions be taken prior to the entry 1\

Page 4 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 CONTROL RODS The River Bend core utilizes the GE design control rods, non GE design CR-82M and CR-82M-1 bottom entry cruciform control rods. These Control Rod designs are discussed in more detail in Reference 3.

DEFINITIONS MOC - Middle of Cycle (EOR- 2070 MWd/MT)

EOW - the cycle exposure corresponding to all rods out, 100% power/100% flow, and normal feedwater temperature EOC - End of Cycle (Core Exposure 31,401 MWd/MTU).

FFWTR - Final Feedwater Temperature Reduction.

FHOOS - Feedwater Heater Out of Service.

PROOS - Pressure Regulator Out of Service.

SLO - Single Loop Operation.

TBOOS -Turbine Bypass Out of Service AREVA - AREVA NP Inc.

GNF - Global Nuclear Fuel EOC-RPT - End of Cycle Recirculation Pump Trip REFERENCE CORE LOADING PATTERN - The Core Loading Pattern Used for Reload Licensing Analysis.

Application Condition - The combination of equipment out of service conditions for which LHGRFAC and MCPR limits are determined. The Application Conditions are as follows:

Application FWHOOS / EOC-RPT OOS PROOS TBOOS Condition FFWTR 1 X 2 X X 3 X X 4 X X 5 X X X 6 X X X 7 X X X X All application conditions address the licensed core flow.

Page 5 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 REVISION HISTORY Revision 0 is to provide the thermal limits for Cycle 16 power operation.

Page 6 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 3.2.1 POWER DISTRIBUTION LIMITS AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (APLHGR)

The limiting APLHGR (sometimes referred to as Maximum APLHGR, or MAPLHGR) as a function of AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE for all fuel types are provided in the table below. These values were determined with the GNF methodology (Reference 1.1). Core location by fuel type is provided in Figure 1 and is the reference core loading pattern in Reference 1.1.

Fuel Type Figure GE14 12 ATRIUM-10 13 For single loop operation (SLO) a multiplier of 0.83 is applied to the APLHGR limits.

I

Page 7 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 3.2.2 POWER DISTRIBUTION LIMITS MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPR)

The MCPR limits for use in Technical Specification 3.2.2 for flow dependent MCPR (MCPRF) and power dependent MCPR (MCPRp) are obtained from Reference 1.5 and are shown below for all fuel types, MOC and EOC points, as well as all Application Conditions which have been previously defined.

The most limiting value from the applicable MCPRf and MCPRp figures is the operating limit. These values were determined with GNF methodology as described in Reference 1.5 and are consistent with a Safety Limit MCPR from Technical Specification 2.0.

MCPRF Values:

The MCPRF values bound all fuel types and the exposure range. For cases where the turbine bypass system is in service (Application Conditions 1, 2, and 3) use Figure 16. For cases where the turbine bypass system is out of service (Application Conditions 4, 5, 6, and 7) use Figure 17. Both figures contain curves for operation of the Recirculation Flow Control System in the loop manual and loop auto modes of operation.

MCPRp Values:

Application Figure Conditions GE14 ATRIUM-10 MOC EOC MOC EOC 1 19 33 20 34 2 21 35 22 36 3 23 37 24 38 4 25 39 26 40 5 27 41 28 42 6 29 43 30. 44 7 31 45 32 46 More limiting values of the power dependent limits may be used in lieu of those indicated by a particular operating mode. For example EOC values may be used instead of the MOC values.

For single loop operation (SLO), the MCPRF and MCPRp limits are determined from the two loop operation (TLO) limits above as follows:

MCPRGl 4 MAX (MCPR TL4 + 0.02,1.44)

MCPRA MAX(MCPRTAO + 0.02,1.40)

Page 8 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 3.2.3 POWER DISTRIBUTION LIMITS LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (LHGR)

The limiting LHGR value for GE14 and ATRIUM-10 as a function of PELLET EXPOSURE are given in Figure 14 and 15, respectively. Core location by fuel type is provided in Figure 1 and is the reference core loading pattern in Reference 1.1. LHGR values were derived from Reference 1.6. LHGRFAC values were obtained from Reference 1.5.

Thermal power and core flow dependent multipliers are shown below for all fuel types, MOC and EOC points, as well as all Application Conditions which have been previously defined. The value of the exposure dependent limit is reduced by the value of the multiplier at a given off-rated power or flow condition.

LHGRFACF Values:

The LHGRFACF values bound all fuel types, exposure range, and Application Conditions and are found in Figure 18 and contains curves for operation of the Recirculation Flow Control System in the loop manual and loop auto modes of operation.

LHGRFACp Values:

Application Figure Conditions GE14 ATRIUM-10 MOC EOC MOC EOC 1,2,4,5 47 51 48 52 3,6,7 49 53 50 54 More limiting values of the power dependent multipliers may be used in lieu of those indicated by a particular operating mode. For example EOC values may be used instead of the MOC values.

For two recirculation loop and single recirculation loop operation the LHGR multiplier is as follows:

For two recirculation loop operation:

LHGRFAC = MIN(LHGRFACp, LGHRFACF)

For single loop operation:

LHGRFAC = MIN(LHGRFACp, LGHRFACF, 0.83)

Page 9 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 3.2.4 POWER DISTRIBUTION LIMITS FRACTION OF CORE BOILING BOUNDARY (FCBB)

Restricted Region Boundary Note: The boundary of the Restricted Region is established by analysis in terms of thermal power and core flow. The Restricted Region boundary is defined by the "non-setup" APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Control Rod Block Setpoints, which are a function of reactorrecirculationdriveflow.

The Restricted Region boundaries as a function of aligned drive flow are given in Figures 4 through 7 in terms of aligned drive flow. The aligned drive flow is calculated from the input drive flow using the relationship given in Table 1.

Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Limits The APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram setpoints as a function of aligned drive flow are given in Figures 4 through 7. The aligned drive flow is calculatedfrom the input drive flow using the relationship given in Table 1.

a. Case I - Normal Feedwater Heating Operation or Low Reactor Power:

TFW (at rated) _>TD'SLN (at rated) - 50' F, and rated equivalent at off-rated reactor conditions.

OR P < 30%

b. Case 2 - Reduced Feedwater Heating Operation TFw (at rated) < TDSIGN (at rated) - 50 F, and rated equivalent at off-rated reactor conditions.

AND P > 30%

Where: TFW is feedwater temperature in 'F, and P is reactor power in percent of rated.

Page 10 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision! 0 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 3.3.1.1 INSTRUMENTATION REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM (RPS) INSTRUMENTATION AVERAGE POWER RANGE MONITORS APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Limits The APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High scram setpoint Allowable Values are given in Figures 4 through 7 in terms of aligned drive flow.

The aligned drive flow is calculated from the input drive flow using the relationship given in Table 1.

a. Case I - Normal Feedwater Heating Operation or Low Reactor Power:

TFw (at rated) > TEwSGN (at rated) - 500 F and rated equivalent at off-rated reactor conditions.

OR P* 30%

b. Case 2 - Reduced Feedwater Heating Operation TW (at rated) < 'TDEsGN (at rated) - 500 F, and rated equivalent at off-rated reactor conditions.

AND P > 30%

Where: TFw is feedwater temperature in 'F, and P is reactor power in percent of rated.

APRM Simulated Thermal Power Time Constant The simulated thermal power time constant for use in Technical Specification Table 3.3.1.1-1, SR 3.3.1.1.14, is (Reference 2):

6 + 0.6 seconds.

The maximum simulated thermal power time constant for use in Technical Specification surveillance Table 3.3.1.1 - 1, SR 3.3.1.1.14 is:

6.6 seconds

Page 11 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 3.3.1.3 INSTRUMENTATION PERIOD BASED DETECTION SYSTEM (PBDS) i Monitored Region Boundary The Monitored Region Boundaries as a function of core flow are given in Figures 2 and 3.

Restricted Region Boundary Note: The boundary of the Restricted Region is established by analysis in terms of thermal power and core flow. The Restricted Region boundary is defined by the. "non-setup" APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Control Rod Block Setpoints, which are afunction of reactor recirculationdriveflow.

The Restricted Region boundaries as a function of aligned drive flow are given in Figures 4 through 7 in terms of aligned drive flow. The aligned drive flow is calculated from the input drive flow using the relationship given in Table 1.

a. Case I - Normal Feedwater Heating Operation or Low Reactor Power:

T, (at rated)-> -FTSI"N (at rated) - 500F ,

and rated equivalent at off-rated reactor conditions.

OR P _ 30%

b. Case 2 - Reduced Feedwater Heating Operation T, (at rated) < TJES"" (at rated) - 500 F, and rated equivalent at off-rated reactor conditions.

AND P > 30%

Where: TFW is feedwater temperature in 'F, and P is reactor power in percent of rated.

Page 12 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT 3.3.1.1 INSTRUMENTATION REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM (RPS) INSTRUMENTATION AVERAGE POWER RANGE MONITORS APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Limits The APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High scram setpoint Nominal Trip Setpoints are given in Figures 4 through 7 in terms of aligned drive flow. The aligned drive flow is calculated from the input drive flow using the relationship given in Table 1.

a. Case I - Normal Feedwater Heating Operation or Low Reactor Power:

TFw (at rated) > TESI"N (at rated)- 500 F and rated equivalent at off-rated reactor conditions.

OR P _*30%

b. Case 2 - Reduced Feedwater Heating Operation TFw (at rated) <T sIN (at rated) - 500 F and rated equivalent at off-rated reactor conditions.

AND P > 30%

Where: TFW is feedwater temperature in 'F, and P is reactor power in percent of rated.

Page 13 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT 3.3.2.1 INSTRUMENTATION CONTROL ROD BLOCK INSTRUMENTATION AVERAGE POWER RANGE MONITORS APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Limits The APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High rod block Allowable Values and Nominal Trip Setpoints are given in Figures 8 through 11 in terms of aligned drive flow. The aligned drive flow is calculated from the input drive flow using the relationship given in Table 1.

a. Case 1 - Normal Feedwater Heating Operation or Low Reactor Power:

T, (at rated) Ž TTSIGN (at rated) - 500 F, and rated equivalent at off-rated reactor conditions.

OR P < 30%

, b. Case 2 - Reduced Feedwater Heating Operation FTw(at rated) < TwSIGN (at rated) - 500 F and rated equivalent at off-rated reactor conditions.

AND P > 30%

Where: TFW is feedwater temperature in 'F, and P is reactor power in percent of rated.

Page 14 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 REFERENCES 1.1. ECH-NE-09-00033, Revision 0, "Supplemental Reload Licensing Report for River Bend Station -

Unit I Reload 15 Cycle 16" 1.2. Letter, R.E. Kingston to G. W. Scronce, "Time Constant Values for Simulated Thermal Power Monitor" GFP-1032 November 30, 1995.

1.3. RBS USAR Section 4.1 and 4.2 1.4. CEO 2003-00047, "River Bend Station Unit 1 E1A Stability Power Uprate Evaluation."

1.5. ECH-NE-09-00032, Revision 0, "GE14 Fuel Design Cycle-Independent Analyses For River Bend Station" 1.6. ECH-NE-09-00034, Revision 0, "Fuel Bundle Information Report for River Bend Station - Unit 1 Reload 15 Cycle 16" ANALYTICAL METHODS DOCUMENTS (TS 5.6.5):

11.1. XN-NF-81-58(P)(A) Revision 2 and Supplements I and 2, RODEX2 Fuel Rod Thermal-Mechanical ResponseEvaluation Model, Exxon Nuclear Company, March 1984.

11.2. XN-NF-85-67(P)(A) Revision 1, Generic Mechanical Design for Exxon Nuclear Jet Pump BWR Reload Fuel, Exxon Nuclear Company, September 1986.

11.3. EMF-85-74(P) Revision 0 Supplement 1 (P)(A) and Supplement 2 (P)(A), RODEX2A (BWR)

Fuel Rod Thermal-Mechanical Evaluation Model, Siemens Power Corporation, February 1998.

11.4. ANF-89-98(P)(A) Revision I and Supplement 1, Generic Mechanical Design Criteria for BWR Fuel Designs, Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation, May 1995.

11.5. XN-NF-80-19(P)(A) Volume I Supplements 1 and 2, Exxon Nuclear Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors - Neutronic Methods for Design and Analysis, Exxon Nuclear Company, March 1983.

11.6. XN-NF-80-19(P)(A) Volume 4 Revision 1, Exxon Nuclear Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors: Application of the ENC Methodology to BWR Reloads, Exxon Nuclear Company, June 1986.

11.7. EMF-2158 (P)(A) Revision 0, Siemens Power Corporation Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors: Evaluation and Validation of CASMO-4/MICROBURN-B2, Siemens Power Corporation, October 1999.

11.8. XN-NF-80-19(P)(A) Volume 3 Revision 2, Exxon Nuclear Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors, THERMEX: Thermal Limits Methodology Summary Description, Exxon Nuclear Company, January 1987.

11.9. XN-NF-84-105(P)(A) Volume I and Volume I Supplements I and 2, XCOBRA-T: A Computer Code for BWR Transient Thermal-Hydraulic Core Analysis, Exxon Nuclear Company, February 1987.

11.10. ANF-524(P)(A) Revision 2 and Supplements 1 and 2, ANF Critical Power Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors, Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation, November 1990.

11.11. ANF-913(P)(A) Volume I Revision I and Volume I Supplements 2, 3 and 4, COTRANSA2: A Computer Program for Boiling Water Reactor Transient Analyses, Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation, August 1990.

Page 15 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 11.12. XN-NF-825(P)(A) Supplement 2, BWR/6 Generic Rod Withdrawal Error Analysis, MCPRp for Plant Operations within the Extended Operating Domain, Exxon Nuclear Company, October 1986.

11.13. ANF-1358(P)(A) Revision 3, The Loss of Feedwater Heating Transient in Boiling Water Reactors, Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation, September 2005.

11.14. EMF-1997(P)(A) Revision 0, ANFB-10 Critical Power Correlation, Siemens Power Corporation, July 1998.

11.15. EMF-1997(P) Supplement I (P)(A) Revision 0, ANFB-10 Critical Power Correlation: High Local Peaking Results, Siemens Power Corporation, July 1998.

11.16. EMF-2209(P)(A) Revision 2, SPCB Critical Power Correlation, Siemens Power Corporation, September 2003.

11.17. EMF-2245(P)(A) Revision 0, Application of Siemens Power Corporation's Critical Power Correlations to Co-Resident Fuel, Siemens Power Corporation, August 2000.

11.18. EMF-2361(P)(A), Revision 0 "EXEM BWR-2000 ECCS Evaluation Model," Framatome ANP Richland, Inc.

11.19. Deleted.

11.20. Deleted.

11.21. NEDC-33383-P, Revision 1, GEXL97 Correlation for Atrium 10 Fuel, (See Echelon EB document ID RA-ENO-GEN-08-039)

,11.22. EMF-CC-074(P)(A) Volume 4 Revision 0, BWR Stability Analysis: Assessment of STAIF with Input from MICROBURN-B2, Siemens Power Corporation, August 2000.

-.!!.23. EMF-2292(P)(A) Revision 0, ATRIUMTM-10 Appendix K Spray Heat Transfer Coefficients, Siemens Power Corporation, September 2000.

11.24. NEDE-2401 1-P-A and US Supplement, "General Electric Standard Application for Reactor Fuel."

Table 1. Aligned Drive Flow 101.209 - A40 - 31.028 A'00 + 70.181 *W*

WD -

70.181 - (A100 -40 Where:

WA = FCTR card input drive flow in percent rated, WD = Aligned drive flow in percent rated, A40 = Low flow drive flow alignment setting, and

'A10O = High flow drive flow alignment setting.

Page 17 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 1. REFERENCE CORE LOADING PATTERN 56 D D DI D I D ID!I DI DI D I + - +- - t I i I - I 54 D

. I . I D..I .CFl FFDID!FiFIDID C 1D ID D 1C 52 DID! F El B F B IF FI BI F IB IE FI DI D 50 DID ID E B! E B Fl BI B F B IE B El DI D D 48 DID I D F B Ei BI FI B!DID! BI F Bi E B! F ID! DI D 46 D ID F IF Bi F BI F A F AIAI FIAI F IB FIBIFIFIDID BIFIBIFIDIDID 44 DIDIDIFIBIFIBIDIAIFIBIDIDIBIFIAID DIDIDIFIRIFIBIDIAIFIBIDIDIBIFIAID B FIB FID DID 42 F II

~cI~DIF DB BBFIAA FB IDI IFBIFBIFDIDC 40 DIFjE B FIB jF BIFB BIF 14BIDIBIFJ.BIFJ.BIFIjBJEjFJ 38 D IE IB IE BIDI BI F AIEIBIEIAIAIEIBIEIAIFIBIDIB E 1B 1E 1D 36 D D B E B F A D B E B D A E E A D B E B D A F B E B D D 34 D FI F BI F A FI BI D B D IA ID A A D IA D B DI B F- A F BI F F D 32 D F B F B F BIFIB E AIDIF F F F D A E BIF B F B F B F D 30 D D F B D A D AIF A E A F D D F A E A F A D A D B F D D 28 D D F B D A D AIF AE A F D D F A E A F A D A D B F D D 26 D F B F B F B FIB E AID F F F F D A E B FIB F B F B F D 24 D F F B F A F B D B D A D A A D A D B D B F A F B F F D 22 D D B E ,B F A D B E BI D A, E .E A, D, B E B D IA F B IE, BI D D 20 D E B E B D B F A E B E A A E B E A F B D B E B E D 18 D F E B FIB F B F BID.B -F F B D B F B F B F B E F D 16 C D D.F B F B F B D B F A A F B D B F B F B F D D C 14 D D D F B F B DA F BID D B FIA D B FIB F D D D 12 LD D F F .B, F B F A F A A F A F B F B F F .D D 10 DDDDFBEB FBDDBF BEBF DDD 8 D D D E B E B F B B F B E B E D D D 6 DID F E B, F, B F F ,B. F B E F, D D 4 C D DID F F D D F F D D D C 2

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 Fuel TvDe DescriDtion Cvde Loaded # Loaded A GE14-P1 OSNAB410-18GZ-1 20T-150-T6-3197 16 64 B GE14-P1OSNAB409-17GZ-120T-150-T6-3196 16 152 C ATRM10-Pl OSAEB378-9GZ-1 14T-9WR-149-T6-3065 13 8 D ATRM10-P1 OSAEB371-13GZ-11 4T-9WR-149-T6-3067 14 184 E ATRM10-Pl OSAEB385-12GZ-11 4T-9WR-1 49-T6-3068 15 56 F ATRM10-P10SAEB381-14GZ-114T-9WR-149-T6-3069 15 160 Total 624

Page 18,of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 2. MONITORED REGION BOUNDARY (CASE 1) 1 20 -.- .--- .-..--.---. ----------.................. ............

90 j  !..  :

~70 80-o ----------------- -- ------------ ---- -----.------.----- --.- ----- ---....-.... ... - .................

i....

W 60 MEGONIOE 0

0.. 50 -.............

O 40 .............................. ...............................................................-----

30 20 -------.......

10 .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 CORE FLOW(% rated)

Page 19 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 3. MONITORED REGION BOUNDARY (CASE 2) 120 110 100 90

" 80 S70 W 60 0

CL 50 w

0 40 30 20 10.

0ý 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 CORE FLOW (% rated)

Page 20, of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 4. APRM FLOW BIASED SIMULATED THERMAL POWER - HIGH SCRAM SETPOINTS AND RESTRICTED REGION BOUNDARY (TWO RECIRCULATION LOOP OPERATION - CASE 1) 120 110 -- --i-- ........

-*--.... i..... .......................

" ....... i .......... i... i.... i...... ..........

i*....... i.......... i..........

100 90 80

  • - Nominal Value 70 Allowable Value 0

60 -------I- ---- -- -- --

---------- 0 TLO Restricted Region- ---

Boundary High Endpoint 0 50 - 7-- S ----- - Setup Scram - -

U __________NS Non-Setup Scram 40 - ........... ¢.......... ¢.......... . ........... .. ... ..... *........................ . . . . . . . . T . . . . .r. . . ..............

ENS KR Restricted Region 30 - ------

20

+ + i +t 10 0n 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 ALIGNED DRIVE FLOW r' rated)

Page 21 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 5. APRM FLOW BIASED SIMULATED THERMAL POWER - HIGH SCRAM SETPOINTS AND RESTRICTED REGION BOUNDARY (SINGLE RECIRCULATION LOOP OPERATION - CASE 1) 121 1101 110 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. ............. ...........- - - --

90 ...........--.......... .......... --- - - - ----------- ........

8o ........................................ ... - --- --- ----- NomirA Value--- --- -

-- Allowable Value 70 -. .---------. -----.-.- -.---.-.---.--.. . ... . . . . . . . . . .... .. . . . . . .. . ... . .;... . . . . .. ..

Q 0 SLO Restricted Region 60 .O ............. Boundary High Endpoint

,o* S SetupScram

!:

  • 0 ! ,//7 ........................... NS Non-Setup Scram........

40 ----- -- .. . -- A- --- ..........

......... DesRIVcted I............ RI Region . . ..

00.......... I...

.. ........ I-----.-- ------

I.-------- -.I.-------- - --- .I.-- --- .--

.I.------ ------ --- --- ----------.... ..

20 0 '10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 ALIGNED DRIVE FLOW r/. rated)

Page 22 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 6. APRM FLOW BIASED SIMULATED THERMAL POWER - HIGH SCRAM SETPOINTS AND RESTRICTED REGION BOUNDARY (TWO RECIRCULATION LOOP OPERATION - CASE 2) 120 110 100 -

90 -

80 - ---

------ ---------- ---- -- - ---S-NominNmnal Value

---- ----- ---- --- -- --- ------- ------ --N -- ---------

70 ble Value Allow alo (U

..... ...... ..-- --- -- -------- ----- ----- ---.. ..RR.. .

TLO RTestricted Region 60 Bound ary High Endpoint 0

IL -R R

----- ---------------- -- - --- ---- --- -------- Setup Scram 50 Non-Setup 0

0. 40 Restricted Region -----------------

30 ----------------- ..................

20 ................. ..................

101 ................. ------- -----------

(1 I ' r ' I ' [ ' I U

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 ALIGNED DRIVE FLOW (% rated)

Page 23 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 7. APRM FLOW BIASED SIMULATED THERMAL POWER - HIGH SCRAM SETPOINTS AND RESTRICTED REGION BOUNDARY (SINGLE RECIRCULATION LOOP OPERATION - CASE 2) 120 1 100 .................................................................................................................................................... .......................... .......... ......... ........................

90

£80 100 -. .--.-------------.---------.---.................. l Va lue Allowable Value O ~ SLO Restricted Region IL ..... ------ ----------

tu 50 -- ...... -..... ... -- . B ounda r y H i gh E ndpo int 0C. 4 0 -..---. S.. --.-.----.--...- --.. ........... .......-- S Setup Scram -- - .---

N Non-Setup 30-N S... ----- ... -------- -------- ------------------ R R R esticte R egion------

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 ALIGNED DRIVE FLOW (% rated)

Page 24 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 8. APRM FLOW BIASED NEUTRON FLUX - HIGH ROD-BLOCK SETPOINTS (TWO RECIRCULATION LOOP OPERATION - CASE 1) 120 110 ,.........................................................................................

100

'----------- .... ..... ..... .... .4 ........ .......... --- -- - ---------- .. . --.......--....

80 8O 0

.r...... .------ ~....

-../i.. . . . . . . . -- -- - ------..

-- "°I°* ° ...!......

r L. 70

-Nominal Value

.......- Allowable Value ------- - ----------

IL w 50 s Setup Red-Block 0ý NS Non-Setup Rod-Block 40 30 20 10 0 . ! I i . i . I i . I i . i .  ! i i .

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 ALIGNED DRIVE FLOW (%rated)

Page 25 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 9. APRM FLOW BIASED NEUTRON FLUX - HIGH ROD-BLOCK SETPOINTS (SINGLE RECIRCULATION LOOP OPERATION - CASE 1) 120 110 100

.......... .......... ........... .......... .......... , =.....,..... .......... .......... .......... ..........

go 80 -- ---- -I --- - -

70 0 Nominal Value 0.

W -.- - --- - - - -- - - - . Allowable Value ..........

60 S Setup Rod-Block 0 50 0.

NS Non-Setup Rod-Block 40 30 20 S 10 0I 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 ALIGNED DRIVE FLOW (%rated)

Page 26 of 70 RBS CYCLE,! 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 10. APRM FLOW BIASED NEUTRON FLUX - HIGH ROD-BLOCK SETPOINTS (TWO RECIRCULATION LOOP OPERATION - CASE 2) 120 90 M- Nominal Value

-Allowable Value 0 INSNon-Setup Rod-Block 0~

10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110'! 120 ALIGNED DRIVE FLOW (%rated)

Page 27 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 11. APRM FLOW BIASED, NEUTRON FLUX - HIGH ROD-BLOCK SETPOINTS (SINGLE RECIRCULATION LOOP OPERATION - CASE 2) 120 110 100 90 80 70 Lu 60 Lu 50 0

C) 40 30 20 10 0

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 ALIGNED DRIVE FLOW (% rated)

Page 28,'of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 12. MAXIMUM AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (MAPLHGR) VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE FOR GE14 14

" i.- . -. * "  !  ! ": T ' ' . . . . ' " "....... .i " " *!. . . . * *" '* ....7 ' : ' . . .* . . ....--- .--.

  • "!ii*  ! ......... '............ i~i ............. .......::- ... i i *..... ... ....... -: .!........

13 ' . _ ' - ______--_____* _* ___

  • -! -..! -' "i" i ":.. ... ...... "

.... ........ - .... . .*" i  !. . .! - * " - "' ' - -  !- "

1 9---------------------- -.--------.---- .-- ----------

~~~~~~~~~

"~~~~~

. . .. !.. .. i "" -i !' . !.

. . . ... i " ' -" ...

-!.. .... .... ... ....... -? - . ! - -""i-

.0 .. . .: . . . . . . .-. - - .. . . .. . . .:. ..... .. ._ . .... * . . . . :. . ... . * .......... .......... .

.....i*- ..T......

. . ..... .. .. i -I *- T - - -* .......... - . . .... --- "... ...

_.; ....... .. ... .[ _ .. . . _ = _ _. . . i...

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Average Planar Exposure (GWd/MTU)

Average Planar Exposure (GWD/MT) MAPLHGR Limit (kW/ft) 0.00 12.82 16.00 12.82 21.10 12.82 63.50 8.00 70.00 5.00

Page 29 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 13. MAXIMUM AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (MAPLHGR) VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE FOR ATRIUM-10 14 13 12 11 10

'-J (LL9 n-10, 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Average Planar Exposure (GWd/MTU)

Average Planar Exposure (GWD/MT) MAPLHGR Limit (kW/ft) 0.00 12.81 18.90 12.81 23.88 12.81 70.40 7.30

Page 306of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 14. LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (LHGR) LIMIT VERSUS PELLET EXPOSURE FOR GE14 GE14 LHGR data is considered GNF proprietary and will: not be contained in the COLR. The GEl4 LHGR data may be found in Reference 1.6.

Page 31 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 15. LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (LHGR) LIMIT VERSUS PELLET EXPOSURE FOR ATRIUM-10 14 13 12 11 10 I

- 9 8

7 6-5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 .70 80 Pellet Exposure (GWd/MTU)

Page 32 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 16. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRF) VERSUS CORE FLOW FOR ATRIUM-10 AND GE14, ALL EXPOSURES, APPLICATION CONDITIONS 1, 2, AND 3 1.V 1.4 Loop Auto 1:3 at n

1.2 1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Core Flow (%rated)

Loop Manual Loop Auto Core Flow Core Flow

(% rated) MCPRF (% rated) MCPRF 20 . 1.26 20 1.34 30 1.26 30 1.34 501 1.19 75 1.19 1101 1.19 1101 1.19

Page 33 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 17. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRF) VERSUS CORE FLOW FOR ATRIUM-10 AND GE14, ALL EXPOSURES, APPLICATION CONDITIONS 4,5, 6, AND 7 1.5 Loop Auto 1.4 1.3 a.

U-1.2 I,

1.1 I

^

1.v 0 10 20 30 40 50 ' 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Core Flow (%rated)

Loop Manual . Loop Auto Core Flow Core Flow

(% rated) MCPRF (% rated) MCPRF 20 1.38 20 1.46 30 1.38 30 1.46 50 1.31 75 1.31 110 1.31 1101 1.31

Page 34 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 18. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE FLOW (LHGRFACF) FOR ATRIUM-10 AND GE14, ALL EXPOSURES, ALL APPLICATION CONDITIONS 1.1 0.9 U.

0.8

"-J Loop Manual 0.7 0.6 Loop Auto 0.5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Core Flow (%rated)

Loop Manual Loop Auto Flow (% rated) LHGRFACF Flow (% rated) LHGRFACF 20.00 0.70 20.00 0.5E 47.30 0.70 39.20 0.5ý 76.60 1.00 83.10 1.0(

I10.0 1.001 110.00 1-.0

Page 35 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 19. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRp) VERSUS CORE POWER FOR GE14, EXPOSURE RANGE BOC TO MOC, APPLICATION CONDITION 1 2.5 50 %>Flow ......... ..

2.4 2.3 2.2 ............

2.1 - 50%X A:---ii---*:---:

Flow ...-:

J 2.0 1.9 1.8

,. iiiiiiii,:

iiiii~ iiiii2  : . .

a.

mw u

1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 2.11 2.44 40.0 1.88 2.04 40.0 1.56 50.0 ,_1.55 70.0 1.44 70.0 1.41 90.0 1.30 100.0 1.27

Page 36 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 20. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRp) VERSUS CORE POWER FOR ATRIUM-10, EXPOSURE RANGE BOC TO MOC, APPLICATION CONDITION 1 2.5 2.4

>550% Flow 2.3 ..........

2.2 2.1

<= 50% Flow, 2.0 1.9 1.8 a.

1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 t 1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 2.05 2.34 40.0 1.83 1.97 40.0 1.56 50.0 1.53 70.0 1.44 70.0 1.40 90.0 1.31 100.0 1.28

Page 37 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 21. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRp) VERSUS CORE POWER FOR GE14, EXPOSURE RANGE BOC TO MOC, APPLICATION CONDITION 2 2.5

- > 50% Flow 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 < 50% Flow 2.0 1.9 1.8 .. .. ....

D.

U 1.7 1--

1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 2.11 2.44 40.0 1.88 2.04 40.0 1.56 50.0 1.55 70.0 1.44 70.0 1.42 90.0 1.36 100.0 1.33

Page 38 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 22. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRp) VERSUS CORE POWER FOR ATRIUM-10, EXPOSURE RANGE BOC TO MOC, APPLICATION CONDITION 2 2.5 I-2:4 5 Flow 2.3 2.2

.*;... . ..._:.:...}_. ..

  • _
  • _. . .:. _.... * .. .. .. .. ._;

2.1 50% Flow 2.0 1.9 ...........

. 1.8 0.

1.7

  • i:..i::i. ::.i-i , -.. ::-i-:---i. -.-.:..... -:-:....-

F- f -:-[-i. .---.

1.6 1.5 I;ý-

1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0 10 20. 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 2.05 2.34 40.0 1.83 1.97 40.0 1.56 50.0 1.53 70.0 1.44 70.0 . 1.43 90.0 1.37 100.0 1.34

Page 39 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 23. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRp) VERSUS CORE POWER FOR GE14, EXPOSURE RANGE BOC TO MOC, APPLICATION CONDITION 3 2.5

> 50% Flow 2.4 2.3-2.2 -

2.1 <= 50% Flow 2.0 1.9 1.8 a.

C.,

1.7 1.6 1.5 1 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0 10 .20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%hrated)

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 2.11 2.44 40.0 1.88 2.04 40.0 2.04 50.0 1.93 70.0 1.74 85.0 1.65 85.0 1.33 90.0 1.30 100.0 1.27

Page 40, of 70 I

RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 24. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRp) VERSUS CORE POWER FOR ATRIUM-l0, EXPOSURE RANGE BOC TO MOC, APPLICATION11 CONDITION 3 b

2.4

>50% Flow 2.3 2.2 2.1

> 50% Flow 2.0 1.9 1.8 0.

C 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2

.1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 2.05 2.34 40.0 1.83 1.97 40.0 1.97 50.0 1.87 70.0 , _1.69 85.0 1.60 85.0 1.33 90.0 1.31 100.0 1.28

Page 41 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 25. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRp) VERSUS CORE POWER FOR GE14, EXPOSURE RANGE BOC TO MOC, APPLICATION CONDITION 4 2.5 2.4 2.3 1-L 2.2 2.1 <= 50% Flow.,

2.0 1.9 1.8 C-)

I-1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 t's ijii iiiiii 1.31 t . ..

1.2 1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 2.11 2.44 40.0 1.88 2.04 40.0 1.56 50.0 1.55 70.0 _1.44 90.0 _1.33 100.0000 1.30

Page 42 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 26. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRp) VERSUS CORE POWER FOR ATRIUM-10, EXPOSURE RANGE BOC TO MOC, APPLICATION CONDITION 4 2.5 2.4 S 50% Flo w ... .............

2.3 2.2 2.1

<= 50% Flow's 2.0 1.9 1.8 a.

C.)

1.7 1.6

.... I 1.5 I ____________t 1.4 1.3 L

1.2 J.

1.1 J E ...... ... . .. ..

1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 2.05 2.34 40.0 1.83 1.97 40.0 _ 1.56 50.0 1.53 70.0 1.44 90.0 1.35 100.0 1.31

Page 43 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE. 27. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRP) VERSUS CORE POWER FOR GE14, EXPOSURE RANGE BOC TO MOC, APPLICATION CONDITION 5 2.5

> 50% Flow 2.4 2.3 2.2

_i~
i<=

50% Flow.

2.1 2.0 1.9 1.8 a.

U 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1-1.3 1.2 1.1 ......... .

1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 2.11 2.44 40.0 1.88 2.04 40.0 1.58 50.0 1.55 70.0 1.46 90.0 1.40 100.0 1.36

Page 44 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 28. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRp) VERSUS CORE POWER FOR ATRIUM-10, EXPOSURE RANGE BOC TO MOC, APPLICATION CONDITION 5 2.5 2.4

> 50% Flow 2.3 2.2 2.1

<= 50% Flow 2.0 1.9-2-

1.8 -

I17 1.7 1.6 -

1.5 1.4 1 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 . 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 2.05 2.34 40.0 1.83 1.97 40.0 1.59 50.0 1.54 70.0 1.47 90.0 _1.41 100.0 _1.37

Page 45 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 29. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRp) VERSUS CORE POWER FOR GE14, EXPOSURE RANGE BOC TO MOC, APPLICATION CONDITION 6 I

2.4 2Fi 2:2:w, :* 0O/2i. 2 i:::: : :i£ 2 2i2 2 :::::::::::::::::::: ......::i:i:i::::i:;: :::2i££J 2.3

<=.TTI 50% Fl2*;i*2 wA - i T£_:2 .T 2 - ~2i2TT ** T ii* * **i -*T* 2 -

2.2 2.1  : .! .1 .: .i .i A ,.~

-i-- ~ i : *- ]. 2 . ', .* ]- : - .- :. :. i- :. ;. ;- *- '- :. .: -* :. !. i. *. :. .- ..-: ....

2.0 ~ ~~~

-:TT ~ ~T!!-i"-*-!PT!-*!**'"-

~ ~ ~ ~":ITI:' ~ ~ ~~..... ...--

1.9

21.:2:-i::

lo w.122*2:.i:.1*2..:.:iZ2.*£22-i.££i

<=50% F .... : £ : :*£*£ :2:**.2

...... 12*

1.8 CL L) m 1.7 1.6 *. . .L..

i i . . . i . . . . . . .. . . . i .. . . . . . .. . .*. . . . . . . .i. . . .. . .. .i . . . .. . .

.:: *-. -...: . :... .i .,.. . . . : - :  :,:  : . *  : .: . .: .i _, .. . . . . .J. . . . .. ; .. .. ...: . . . ..= ! . .. . . .. .

  • £*H IT'---:  :-:-!.i.---*-.i~

{!; ~ii  ! -.-  ::-:-.

    • -,;.*++.-i-*.:----.i-;-:---*.*-*--.2.- T*:- -------

1.5 ii-:*-:- * :-i*.* --!i- -i -i !

  • i...---* -i * -.-i-i .:.:-,:-i.i -: - -i* -i : --- .. i .i ....i-7--

1.4 1.3 i.2 1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 2.11 2.44 40.0 1.88. 2.04 40.0 2.04 50.0 1.93 70.0 1.74 85.0 1.65 85.0 1.36 90.0 1.33 100.0 1.30

Page 46 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 30. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRp) VERSUS CORE POWER FOR ATRIUM-10, EXPOSURE RANGE BOC TO MOC, APPLICATION CONDITION 6 2.5 2.4

> 50% Fo 2.3 2.2 2.1

<= 50% Flow.

2.0 1.9 1.8 a-1.7 i.........

1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3-t F 1.2 4

1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 2.05 2.34 40.0 1.83 1.97 40.0 1.97 50.0 1.87 70.0 1.69 85.0 1.60 85.0 1.37 90.0 1.35 100.0 1.31

Page 47 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 31. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRp) VERSUS CORE POWER FOR GE14, EXPOSURE RANGE BOC TO MOC, APPLICATION CONDITION 7 2.5

> 50% Flow Kl .7.7.7 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.8

(. T 1.7 1.6 1.51 1.4 1.3 1 ..........

to 1.2 - -

1.1 .. . . ........

1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 , 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 2.11 2.44 40.0 1.88 2.04 40.0 2.04 50.0 1.93 70.0 _ 174 85.0 1.65 85.0 1.42 90.0 1.40 100.0 _ 1.36

Page 48 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 32. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRp) VERSUS CORE POWER FOR ATRIUM-10, EXPOSURE RANGE BOC TO MOC, APPLICATION:

CONDITION 7 2.5 2.4 .. . . . . . . . . . .i

': :i" ...... i': -. *r-*

-~*>50% Flow.

2.3 2.2 2.1

<- 50% Flow 2.0 1.9 1.8 A a-t.3 1.7 .-: .:.... .... . . .... , - . .;..: ..* . -. -.. - -. .: -. -

1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1-7 7 db d-1.1 -T 7.7 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 2.05 2.34 40.0 1.83 1.97 40.0 1.97 50.0 1.87 70.0 1.69 85.0 1.60 85.0 1.43 90.0 1.41 100.0 1.37

Page 49 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 a

FIGURE 33. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRp) VERSUS CORE POWER FOR GE14, EXPOSURE RANGE, MOC TO EOC, APPLICATION CONDITION 1 2.5

.> 50% Flow 2.3 2.2

~=50% Fo 2.1-2.0 1.9 1.8 a-0 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.44 40.0 1.90 2.04 40.0 1.63 50.0 1.63 70.0 1.50 70.0 1.50 90.0 1.35 100.0 _ _ 1.31

Page 50 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0

/

FIGURE 34. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRp) VERSUS CORE POWER FOR ATRIUM-10, EXPOSURE RANGE MOC TO EOC, APPLICATION CONDITION 1

-I 0.

C.)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 2.08 2.34 40.0 1.86 ] 1.97 40.0 11.60 50.0 J1.60 70.0 _ 1.48 70.0 _1.48

  • 90.0 _ _ _ 1.35 100.0 1.31

Page 51 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 35. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRp) VERSUS CORE POWER FOR GE14, EXPOSURE RANGE MOC TO EOC, APPLICATION CONDITION 2 2.5

> 50% Flow-%

2.4 2.3 2.2

. . . .w..

S. .....

2.1 2.0 1.9 .* .. ... : :.. ;.. . :. -.-. :. :

1.8 C,

1.7 1.6 i . .- ..- -... .-..

1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.44 40.0 1.90 2.04 40.0 1.63 50.0 1.63 70.0 1.50 70.0 1.50 90.0 1.39 100.0 1.36

Page 52 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 36. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRp) VERSUS CORE POWER FOR ATRIUM-10, EXPOSURE RANGE MOC TO EOC, APPLICATION,,

CONDITION 2

2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 . 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 2.08 2.34 40.0 1.86 1.97 40.0 1.60 50.0 1.60 70.0 1.48 70.0 _1.48 90.0 _1.39 100.0 _1.35

Page 53 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 37. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRp) VERSUS CORE POWER FOR GE14, EXPOSURE RANGE MOC TO EOC, APPLICATION CONDITION 3 2.5

> 50% Flow .......... ..

2.4 2.3 2.2

<= 50% Flow 2.1 2.0 1 1.9 1.8 0.

U1 1.7 1.6 1.5 1 -

14 1.3 1.2 ...

1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.44 40.0 1.90 2.04 40.0 2.04 50.0 1.95 70.0 1.75 85.0 1.66 85.0 1.39 90.0 1.35 100.0 1.31

Page 54 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 38. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRp) VERSUS CORE POWER FOR ATRIUM-10, EXPOSURE RANGE MOC TO EOC, APPLICATIONI CONDITION 3 2.5 C,

C-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 2.08 2.34 40.0 1.86 1.97 40.0 1.97 50.0 1.88 70.0 1.70 85.0 1.61 85.0 1.38 90.0 1.35 100.0 1.31

Page 55 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 39. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRp) VERSUS CORE POWER FOR GE14, EXPOSURE RANGE MOC TO EOC, APPLICATION CONDITION 4 C.,

1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.44 40.0 1.90 2.04 40.0 1.63 50.0 1.63 70.0 1.52 90.0 1-- -1.38 100.0 1 1.34

Page 56 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 40. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRp) VERSUS CORE POWER FOR ATRIUM-10, EXPOSURE RANGE MOC TO EOC, APPLICATION CONDITION 4 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.8 .....

0.

1.)

1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 L A..

1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 2.08 2.34 40.0 1.86 1.97 40.0 1.60 50.0 1.60 70.0 1.50 90.0 1.38 100.0 1.34

Page 57 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 41. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRp) VERSUS CORE POWER FOR GE14, EXPOSURE RANGE MOC TO EOC, APPLICATION CONDITION 5

2. 5 . . . . . . . . . . .

2:4 4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 -

1.9

=. 1.8 a.

0)

I 1.7 I 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.44 40.0 1.90 2.04 40.0 1.63 50.0 _ _ 1.63 70.0 1.52 90.0 1.42 100.0 1.38

Page 58 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 42. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRp) VERSUS CORE POWER FOR ATRIUM-10, EXPOSURE RANGE MOC TO EOC, APPLICATION CONDITION 5 2.5 ............

-7 7 2.4

.> 50% Flow 2.3 ...

2.2 2.1 50% Flow 2.0 1.9 1.8 C."

a.

1.7 161.-

1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 I-i .

1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow . > 50% Flow 23.8 2.08 2.34 40.0 1.86 .1.97 40.0 1.60 50.0 1.60 70.0 1.50 90.0 1.43 100.0 1.39

Page 59 of 70 16 COLR0 RBS CYCLERevision FIGURE 43. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRp) VERSUS CORE POWER FOR GE14, EXPOSURE RANGE MOC TO EOC, APPLICATION CONDITION 6 2.5

_*.*:..:.,:..[.

> 50% Flow 2.4 ----

2.3 2.2

-t . A

<= 50% FIow 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.8 I-C.

m 1.7 1 1.6 1.5 1.4-1.3 -

J -I 1.2 ....... .....

1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.44 40.0 1.90 2.04 40.0 2.04 50.0 1.95 70.0 1.75 85.0 1.66 85.0 1.42 90.0 1.38 100.0 1.34

Page 60 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 44. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRp) VERSUS CORE POWER FOR ATRIUM-10, EXPOSURE RANGE MOC TO EOC, APPLICATION CONDITION 6 2.5

-* ,+

F, o>50% - -*- -i . . .. . * . . .. -!-i -i- .. .. . ..[._ .- ..".. . ..*.. .-.L .....--.... . ....

2.4 -

.... .... * .....=

__-i

+ -!: =!,+=-=?=== *-=i i i !

  • i i ? ? ==! !............ * == -

>500% Flow.

2.3

! . *-!- i *..*..  ! i-'* -?-i - i .- .!. * -i- !.. .. * -i-- -'i i.-.--! -!..

-i - -.--!--" i--! . - .-.-.-

2.2 2.1

<= 50% Flow 2.0 1.9 1R . .* .- ...-

t.)

1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 ...

1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 2.08 2.34 40.0 1.86 1.97 40.0 1.97 50.0 1.88 70.0 1.70 85.0 1.61 85.0 1.41 90.0 1.38 100.0 1.34

Page 61 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 45. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRp) VERSUS CORE POWER FOR GE14, EXPOSURE RANGE MOC TO EOC, APPLICATION CONDITION 7 2.5

> 50% Flow 2.4 2.3 2.2

<. 50%/.

. Flow 2.1 2.0 ........

4-1.9 0.

U 1.7 1 1.6 1.5 K

1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 INK 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 2.13 2.44 40.0 1.90 2.04 40.0 2.04 50.0 1.95 70.0 1.75 85.0 1.66 85.0 1.45 90.0 1.42 100.0 1.38

Page 62 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 46. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR (MCPRp) VERSUS CORE POWER FOR ATRIUM-10, EXPOSURE RANGE MOC TO EOC, APPLICATION CONDITION 7 2.5 2.4

> 50% Flow 2.3 L

2.2 2.1 1'-

<=50% Flow:

2.0 1.9

~.1.8 m 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 --- ------------

1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 2.08 2.34 40.0 1.86 1.97 40.0 1.97 50.0 1.88 70.0 1.70 85.0 1.61 85.0 1.45 90.0 1.43 100.0 1.39

Page 63 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 47. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp) FOR GE14, EXPOSURE RANGE BOC TO MOC, APPLICATION CONDITIONS 1, 2, 4, AND 5

  • 1.1 0.9 C.,

-i-

-I 0.8 0.7 0.6 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power (%

rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 0.861 0.651 40.0 0.959 0.785 40.0 1.000 100.0 1.000

Page 64 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 48. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp) FOR ATRIUM-10, EXPOSURE RANGE BOC TO MOC, APPLICATION CONDITIONS 1,.2,4, AND 5 101 0.9

.)-

LL

<= 50% Flow 0.8

> 50% Flow 0.7 0.6 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power (%

rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 0.810 0.707 40.0 0.900 0.777 40.0 1.000 100.0 1.000

Page 65 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 49. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp) FOR GE14, EXPOSURE RANGE BOC TO MOC, APPLICATION CONDITIONS 3,6, AND 7 1.1 0.9

<= 50% Flow C,,

0.8 0.7-

> 50% Flow 0.6 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power (%

rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 0.861 0.651 40.0 0.959 0.785 40.0 0.785 50.0 0.838 70.0 0.914 85.0 0.960 85.0 1.000 100.0 1.000

Page 66 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 50. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp) FOR ATRIUM-10, EXPOSURE RANGE BOC TO MOC, APPLICATION CONDITIONS 3,6, AND 7 1.1 0.9 /.

LL Ir 0-50% Flow 0.8

  • r *!-i-

> 50% Flow 0.7 0.6 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power (%

rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 0.810 0.707 40.0 0.900 0.777 40.0 0.777 50.0 0.808 70.0 0.879 85.0 0.930 85.0 1.000 100.0 1.000

Page 67 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 51. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp) FOR GE14, EXPOSURE RANGE MOC TO EOC, APPLICATION CONDITIONS 1, 2, 4, AND 5 1.1

~ ~ . ..:

0.9 U

C,

.J 0.8

~=50% Flow 0.7 50 Flow 0.6 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 0.749 0.647 40.0 0.854 0.742 40.0 1.000 100.0 1.000

Page 68 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 52. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp) FOR ATRIUM-10, EXPOSURE RANGE MOC TO EOC, APPLICATION CONDITIONS 1, 2,4, AND 5 1.1 A::  :  : :  :  : :  : :  :  : :  : :  :  :  : :

i~. ...l.......

0.9 U

-r

.I 0.8 ~~~~~ ~2...i~ ~ ~:ii:ii?:!

......i...i. ~ .i.~ ~ ~~ ~~~..

i .... i...i.i

.. .L. .

0.7 0.6 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power

(% rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 0.781 0.628 40.0 0.890 0.733 40.0 1.000 100.0 1.000

Page 69 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 53. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp) FOR GE14, EXPOSURE RANGE MOC TO EOC, APPLICATION CONDITIONS 3,6, AND 7 1.1 09 "U-

.,J 0.8

.......... .i i i i i i i i i~ i i 0.7

> 50% Flow 0.6 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power (%

rated) <= 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 0.749- 0.647 40.0 0.854 0.742 40.0 0.742 50.0 0.797 70.0 0.875 85.0 0.924 85.0 1.000 100.0 1.000

Page 70 of 70 RBS CYCLE 16 COLR Revision 0 FIGURE 54. LHGR MULTIPLIER VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp) FOR ATRIUM-]0, EXPOSURE RANGE MOC TO EOC, APPLICATION CONDITIONS 3,6, AND 7 1.1  :~ ~~l i i ~ ~.ii.~. .i . .i .~.. i i i~ .. .. .

  • i . .l . ... ;. . .- . *.- ... . . * - . ; . . . . . . - i . . - L ! - * . - L - . A - . . .* - . . . *  ; i. . . .. *

... ! i i i

.. ] i i i i i ! [ ! i i * !

  • i i
  • ~ i ~* i Ai ; i  ; dii i i i ! ! i i ; i i 0.9

< 0 Flo .. : i 2 i 2 ! i i i i  ! ; i i

  • i . ~.i. .!.ij *. .
  • i i 2.* L i i 2 .!

C.,

C,

--J i ~Flow*

0.8 i>*50%i~

[*~ ~~ ~~! i ~* ii ~i ~i iii[~~ ~~~~~~~.....

i i i i i ?

ii! *i[ -~

i

[

ii

~! i

  • i
  • 0.7 0.6 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power (%

rated) < 50% Flow > 50% Flow 23.8 0.781 0.628 40.0 0.890 0.733 40.0 0.733 50.0 , _0.789 70.0 0.876 85.0 0.930 85.0 1.000 100.0 1.000

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=RBG-46965,_Submittal_of_Sixteenth_Fuel_Cycle_Core_Operating_Limits_Report&oldid=2561243"