RBG-47635, Nineteenth Fuel Cycle Core Operating Limits Report, Revision 1
| ML16025A088 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | River Bend  |
| Issue date: | 01/18/2016 |
| From: | Clark J Entergy Operations |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| RBG-47635 | |
| Download: ML16025A088 (110) | |
Text
Entergy Operations, Inc.
River Bend Station O-Entergy 5485 U.S. Highway 61 N St. Francisville, LA 70775 Tel 225-381-4177 Joseph A. Clark Manager, Regulatory Assurance January 18, 2016 RBG-47635 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
Nineteenth Fuel Cycle Core Operating Limits Report, Revision 1 River Bend Station - Unit 1 Docket No. 50-458 License No. NPF-47
Dear Sir or Madam:
Enclosed is Revision 1 of the River Bend Station (RBS) Core Operation Limits Report (COLR) for the nineteenth fuel cycle. This report is submitted in accordance with Technical Specification 5.6.5 of Appendix A of the Facility Operating License NPF-47.
This letter does not contain any commitments.
For further information, please contact me at (225) 381-4177.
cc: Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV 1600 East Lamar Blvd.
Arlington, TX 76011-4511
/ 00/
RBG-47635 Page 2 of 2 NRC Senior Resident Inspector P. 0. Box 1050 St. Francisville, LA 70775 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Mr. Stephen S. Koenick MS 8 B1A One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852 Department of Environmental Quality Office of Environmental Compliance Radiological Emergency Planning and Response Section Ji Young Wiley P.O. Box 4312 Baton Rouge, LA 70821-4312 Public Utility Commission of Texas Attn: PUC Filing Clerk 1701 N. Congress Avenue P. 0. Box 13326 Austin, TX 78711-3326 RBF1 0192
Core Operating Limits Report Cycle 19 Revision 1
3eZn1t9o
'or 0rtehJriaiH Page 1 of 107 Page1 of107LAR 2O15-01 Rev. 1
RepTORt Yce1 Bnd RivrtatonoreOpRatngLiItSIO REVISION HISTORY P.eVlSlOrI-ue_*cr!_*!! On ..... ...........
-Kev-islon . ...
I -'wvision--- i- KAvIsIon-uQscflrnIc~n -
0 Original Issue 1 Editorial change to: 1) Correct Figures 7.1-la through 7.1-7b to change the graph vertical axis label from MCPRP to MCPRF consistent with the figure title and input reference data, and correct the heading of the first column on the associated table located below each graph from Power (%Rated) to Flow (% Rated); 2) Correct Figures 8.2-1a through 8.2-7b to change the graph vertical axis label from LHGRFACP to LHGRFACF consistent with the figure title and input reference data. 3) Replaced duplicate Figure 8.2-4b on page 62 with the correct Figure 8.2-4a including vertical axis label correction described in item 2. 4) Added omitted figure number and first line of title to Figure 8.3-6b on page 91 and Figure 8.3-6c on page 92.
Page 2 of 107 Page2 of107LAR 2015-01 Rev..1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - CyCle 19 Revision 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PURPOSE ....................................................................................... 4 2.0 SCOPE ............................................................................................ 4
3.0 REFERENCES
...................... .......... .................... ,............................ 4 3.1 CURRENT CYCLE REFERENCES ........................... ,.................................................................4 3.2 METHODOLOGY REFERENCES................"............................................................................. 4 4.0 DEFINITIONS,.....................................................................;........... ;.... 4 5.0 CORE DESIGN .................................... ................................................
5.1 REFERENCE CORE LOADING PATTIERN ....................................................... ..... ....................... 7 5.2 CONTROL RODS............................................................................................................. 7 6.0 AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (APLHGR) ................. 7 7.0 MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPR)............................................... 7 7.1 FLOW-DEPENDENT MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPRF) VALUES:............................................ 7 7.2 POWER-DEPENDENT MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPRp) VALUES:................8 8.0 LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (LHGR)............................................... 8 8.1 EXPOSURE-DEPENDENT LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (LHGR) VALUES:................8 8.2 FLOW-DEPENDENT LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE FACTORS (LHGRFACF) VALUES:............................ 9 8.3 FLoW-DEPENDENT LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE FACTORS (LHGRFACF) VALUES:............................ 9 9.0 STABILITY....................................................................................... 9 9.1 STABILITY REGION BOUNDARIES AND SETPOINTS...........................,........................................... 10 9.2 APRM FLOW BIASED SIMULATED THERM*AL POWER-HIGH TIME CONSTANT (SR 3.3.1.1.14).....................11 Page 3 of 107 2015-01 Page3 of107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1
... . ... ..1.0 .. ...PURPo s ElY- .. . . .. . . . . ~ - - . .. . . . - . . . .' - . . . . .. . .. . . . .. .
The COLR is controlled as a License Basis Document and revised accordingly for each fuel cycle or remaining portion of a 'fuel cycle. Any revisions to the COLR must be submitted to the NRC for information as required byTech Spec 5.6.5 and tracked by RBS License Commitment LI11358.
2.0 SCOPE As defined in Technical Specification 1.1, the COLR is the document that provides the core operating limits for the current fuel cycle. This document is prepared in accordance with Technical Specification 5.6.5 for each reload cycle using NRC-approved analytical methods.
The limits included in this report are:
- 4) LCO 3.2.4, Fraction of Core Boiling Boundary (FCBB)
- 5) LCO 3.3.1.1, RPS Instrumentation (RPS), Function 2.b
- 6) LCO 3.3.1.3, Periodic Based Detection System (PBDS)
3.0 REFERENCES
This section contains the background, cycle-specific, and methodology references used in the current cycle reload analysis.
3.1 Current Cycle References 3.1.1 ECH-NE-14-00048 Revision 0, Supplemental Reload Licensing Report for River Bend Station -
Unit 1 with GNF3 - Unit I Reload 18 Cycle 19.
3.1.2 ECH-NE-14-00049 Revision 0, Fuel Bundle information Report for River Bend Station - Unit I Reload 18 Cycle 19.
3.1.3 Letter, R. E. Kingston to G. W. Scronce, "Time Constant Values for Simulated Thermal lpower Monitor", RBC-46410, November 30, 1995.
3.1.4 RBS Updated Safety Analysis Report..
3.1.5 ECH--NE-15-00004, Revision 0, "RBS C19 GESTAR Assessment" 3.2 Methodology References The Technical Specifications (TS) supported by each methodology reference are provided in brackets.
The following are applicable to GNF supplied fuel.
3.2.1 NEDE-2401 1-P-A, General Electric Standard Application for Reactor Fuel (GESTAR-II).
4.0 DEFINITIONS Page 4 of 107 Page4 of107LAR 2015-01 Rev. I
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 4.1 Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (APLHGR) - the APLHGR shall be applicable to a specific planar height and is equal to the sum of the linear heat generation rates for all the fuel rods in the specified bundle at the specified height divided by the number of fuel rods in the fuel bundle.
4.2 Average Planar Exposure - the Average Planar Exposure shall be applicable to a specific planar height and is equal to the sum of the exposure of all the fuel rods in the specified bundle at the specified height divided by the number of fuel rods in the fuel bundle.
4.3 Critical Power Ratio (CPR) - the ratio of that power in the assembly, which is calculated by application of the fuel vendor's appropriate boiling correlation, to cause some point in the assembly to experience boiling transition, divided by the actual assembly operating power.
4.4 Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) - The River Bend Station specific document that provides core operating limits for the current reload cycle in accordance w~ith Technical Specification 5.6.5.
4.5 Linear Heat Generation Rate (LHGR) - the LHGR shall be the heat generation per unit length of fuel rod. It is the integral of the heat flux over the heat transfer area associated with the unit length. -.
4.6 Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPR) - the MCPR shall be the smallest CPR which exists in the co re.
4.7 MCPR Safety Limit - the minimum value of the CPR at which the fuel could be operated with the expected number"of rods' in boiling transition not exceeding 0.1% of the fuel rods in the core.
4.8 Aligned* Drive Flow - Adjusted FCTR card input drive flow signal that accounts for actual variations in the core flow to drive flow relationship.
4.9 Monitored Region - The area of the core power and flow operating domain where the reactor may be susceptible to reactor instabilities under conditions exceeding the licensing basis of the current reactor system.
4.10 Restricted Region - The area of the core power and flow operating domain where the reactor is susceptible to reactor instabilities in the absence of restrictions on core void distributions.
4.11 Setpoint "Setup" - A FCTR card feature that sets the normal "non-setup" EIA APRM flow-biased scram and control rod block trip reference setpoints associated with the Exclusion and Restricted Regions higher to permit required reactor maneuvering in the Restricted Region when stability controls are in effect.
4.12 EOR -the cycle exposure corresponding to all rods out, 100% power/100% flow, and normal feedwater temperature.
4.13 MOC - Middle of Cycle (EOR-2,794 MWd/MTU) [Reference 3.1.1, page 19].
4.14 EOC - End of Cycle (Core Exposure 35,094 MWd/MTU) [Reference 3.1.1. page 6].
4.15 FFWTR - Final Feedwater Temperature Reduction.
4.16 FHOOS - Feedwater Heater Out of Service.
4.17 PROOS - Pressure Regulator Out of Service.
4.18 SLO - Single Loop Operation.
Page 5 of 107 Page5 of107LAR 2015-01 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating *Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision I
.... 4.19 TBOOS -Turbine Bypass Out of Service 4.20 AREVA - AREVA NP Inc.
4.21 GNF - Global Nuclear Fuel 4.22 EOC-RPT - End of Cycle Recirculation Pump Trip 4.23 Reference Core Loading Pattern - The Core Loading Pattern Used for Reload Licensing Analysis.
4.24 Application. Condition - The combination of equipment out of service conditions for which LHGRFAC and MCPR limits are determined [Reference 3.1.1, page 38]. The Application Conditions are as follows:
All application conditions address the licensed core flow.
Page 6 of 107 Page6 of107LAR 2015-01 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 5.0 CORE DESIGN 5.1 Reference Core Loading Pattern The original Reference Core Loading pattern is presented in Reference 3.1.1.
During the core shuffle a fuel failure was identified. This bundle was scheduled to be shuffled, but because of the failure was discharged and replaced with a similar bundle that was scheduled for discharge. The revised core loading was evaluated in Reference 3.1.5 with the determination that the reload evaluation results were applicable to the revised core.
5.2 Control Rods The River Bend core utilizes the GE design control rods, non GE design CR-82M and CR-82M-1 bottom entry cruciform control rods. These control rod designs are discussed in more detail in Reference 3.1.4, Sections 4.1 and 4.2.
6.0 AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (APLHGR)
Per Technical Specification 3.2.1, all APLHGR values shall not exceed the exposure-dependent limits reported as follows:
Fuel Type Figure GNF2 6.1-la GNF3 6.1-lb For limitssingle for allloop fuel operation types. (SLO) a multiplier of 0.83 [Reference
Per Technical Specification 3.2.2, the MCPR values shall be equal to or greater than the operating limit.
The operating limit is the maximum of the flow-dependent minimum critical power ratio (MCPRF) and the power-dependent minimum critical power ratio (MCPRp).
MCPRF and MCPRp limits are provided in Sections 7.1 and 7.2 below. These limits address the different fuel types, exposure ranges and application conditions.
For single recirculation loop operation (SLO), the MCPR limit is increased by 0.02 [Reference 3.1.1, page 341 to address the difference in the safety limit MCPR reported in Technical Specification 2.1.1.2.
7.1 Flow-Dependent Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPRF) Values:
The MCPRF curves are from Reference 3.1.1, Appendix D as augmented by Reference 3.1.1, Appendix F and are found in the following figures:
Application Figures Condition GNF2 GNF3 1 7.1-la 7.1-lb Page 7 of 107 Page7 of107LAR 2015-01 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 ApplicationFiue Condition GNF2 GNF3 2 7.1-2a 7.1-3b 3 7.1-3a 7.1-3b 4 - I .-A-4a---.
" -4 ' 14i----- :-- . . .. ... .". .. ...
______5 6
___]
J 7.1-5a 7.1-6a I
j 7.1-5b-7.1-6b 7 J 7.1-7a j 7.1-7b 7.2 Power-Dependent Minimum Critical *Power Ratio (MCPRp) Values:
The MCPRP curves are from Reference 3.1.1, Appendix 0 as augmented by Reference 3.1.1, Appendix F and are found in the following figures:
Figure Application BOC - MOC MOC - EOC Condition GNF2 GNF3 GNF2 GNF3 1 7.2-la 7.2-lb 7.2-1c 7.2-1d 2 7.2-2a 7.2-2b 7.2-2c 7.2-2d 3 7.2-3a 7.2-3b 7.2-3c 7.2-3d 4 7.2-4a 7.2-4b 7.2-4c 7.2-4d 5 7.2-5a 7.2-5b 7.2-5c 7.2-5d 6 7.2-6a 7.2-6b' 7.2-6c 7.2-6d 7 7.2-7a 7.2-7b 7.2-7c 7.2-7d More limiting values of the power dependent limits may be used in lieu of those indicated by a particular operating mode. For example EOC values may be used instead of the MOC values.
8.0 LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (LHGR)
Per Technical Specification 3.2.3, the,LHGR values for any rod at any axial location shall not exceed the exposure-dependent limits multiplied by the *smaller of either the power-dePendent or flow-dependent LHGR factors.
For single loop operation (SLO) a multiplier of 0.83 [Reference 3.1.1, page 55] is applied to the LHGR limits for all fuel types.
For two recirculation loop and single recirculation loop operation the LHGR multiplier is as follows:
For two recirculation loop operation:
LHGRFAC = MlN(LHGRFACp, LHGRFACF)
For single loop operation:
LHGRFAC = MIN(LHGRFACp, LHGRFACF, 0.83) 8.1 Exposure-Dependent Linear Heat Generation Rate (LHGR) Values:
Page 8 of 107 Page8 of107LAR 2015-01 Rev. 1
River Bend1 Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision GNF2 and GNF3 exposure-dependent LHGR values are considered GNF proprietary and will not be contained in the COLR. The GNF2 LHGR values may be found in Reference 3.1.2, page 3. Per Reference 3.1.1, Appendix F the GNF2 exposure dependent LHGR values may be applied to' the GNF3 fuel.
8.2 Flow-Dependent Linear Heat Generation Rate Factors (LHGRFACF) Values:
The LHGRFACF curves are from Reference 3.1.1, Appendix 0 as augmented by Reference 3.1.1, Appendix F and are found in the following figures:
Application Figures condition GNF2 GNF3 1 8.2-la 8.2-lb 2 8.2-2a 8.2-2b 3 8.2-3a 8.2-3b 4 8.2-4a 8.2-4b 5 8.2-5a 8.2-5b 6 8.2-6a 8.2-6b 7 8.2-7a 8.2-7b 8.3 Power-Dependent Linear Heat Generation Rate Factors (LHGRFACp) Values:
The LHGRFACp curves are from Reference 3.1.1, Appendix* D as augmented by Reference 3.1.1, Appendix F and are found in the following figures:
Figure Application BOC - MOC ,MOC - EOC Conditions GNF2 GNF3 ' GNF2* GNF3
.1 8.3-la 8.3-lb 8.3-1c 8.3-1d, 2 8.3-2a 8.3-2b 8.3-2c 8.3-2d.
3 8.3-3a 8.3-3b 8.3-3c 8.3-3d 4 8.3-4a 8.3-4b 8.3-4c 8.3-4d 5 8.3-5a 8.3-4b 8.3-5c 8.3-5d 6 8.3-6a 8.3-4b 8.3-6c 8.3-6d
'7 "8.3-7a 8.3-4b 8.3-7c 8.3-7d More limiting particular valuesmode.
operating of theForpower dependent example EOC valuesmultipliers may bemayusedbeinstead used in lieu MOO of those indicated by a of the values.
9.0 STABILITY The following Technical Specifications / Technical Requirements contain stability related requirements:
- TS 3.2.4, Fraction of Core Boiling Boundary (FCBB)
- TS 3.3.1.1, RPS Instrumentation (RPS)
- TS 3.3.1.3, Periodic Based Detection System (PBDS)
Page 9 of 107 Page9 of107LAR 2015-01 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1
. ..... =- -rTR 3.3.2.1, Control Rod Blockl~lstru~rn-entatio nl -.. . . ..- * ....... . .. .... ..... . .
9.1 Stability Region Boundaries and Setpoints region boundaries and setpoints are as follows Description Figure Monitored Region Boundary (Case 1) 9.1-1 Monitored Region Boundary (Case 2) 9.1-2 APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted 9.1-3 Region Boundary (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1)_______
APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted 9.1-4 Region Boundary (Two Recirculatlon Loop Operation -- Case 2)
APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted 9.1-5 Region Boundary (Single Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1)
APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted 9.1-6 Region_ Boundary (Single Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2)
APRM Flow Biased-Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Two Recirculation Loop 9.1-7 Operation - Case 1)
APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Two Recirculation Loop 9.1-8 Operation - Case 2)
APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints .(Single Recirculation 9.1-9 Loop Operation - Case 1) ...
APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod"Block. Setpoints (Single Recirculation 9.1-10 Loop Operation - Case 2)
Note: For Figures 9.1-3 to 9.1-10, the NominaI.Setpoints should be used for indicating the entry into a particular stability region as allowed and appropriate actions be taken prior to the entry In the table above, two distinct operating states (Case I and Case 2) are considered. These are described as follows:
Case I - Normal Feedwater Heatinq Operation or Low Reactor Power :
TFW (at rated)>Ž TI~siG (at rated)-5Q0 F, and rated equivalent at off-rated reactor conditions OR P*<30%
Case 2 - Reduced Feedwater Heating Operation:
TFW (at rated) < T~v 5s1G (at rated) - 50° F AND P>30% *I Page 10 of 107 Page 0of107LAR 2015-0,1 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 The APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High scram setpoint and Restricted Region Boundary, and APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints are given in terms of aligned drive flow. The aligned drive flow is calculated from the input drive flow using the following relationship:
WD 101.209 x A40 - 31.028 x A1°° + 70.181 x W 70.181 - (AO _ 0 Where: W5 = FCTR card input drive flow in percent rated, WD = Aligned drive flow in percent rated, A40 = Low flow drive flow alignment setting, and A1° = High flow drive flow alignment setting.
9.2 APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power-High Time Constant (SR 3.3.1.1.14)
The simulated thermal power time constant is 6 + 0.6 seconds (Reference 3.1.3). Thus the maximum simulated thermal power time constant for use in meeting the surveillance requirement is 6.6 seconds.
Page 11 of 107 Page11 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 6.1-la. MAXIMUM AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (MAPLHGR) VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE FUEL TYPE: GNF2 15 14 13 12 11 10 9
8 C, 7
- 0. 6 5
4 3
2 I
0 0 20 40 60 80 Average Planar Exposure (GWD/MTU)
Average Planar, MAPLHGR Limit Exposure (kW/ft) 0.00 13.78 19.31 13.78 67.00 7.50 70.00 6.69 Page 12 of 107 Page12 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision I FIGURE 6.1-lb. MAXIMUM AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (MAPLHGR) VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE FUEL TYPE: GNF3 15 14 13
,12 11 10
-C-
.J*
4 3
2 1
0 0 20 40 60 80 Average Planar Exposure (GWDIMTU)
Average Planar MAPLHGR Limit Exposure (kW/ft) 0.00 13.78 19.31 13.78 67.00 7.50 70.00 6.69 Page 13 of 107 Page13 o2O15-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.1-la. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE FLOW (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION:, 1 FUEL TYPE: -G NF2 1.5
-!.-- I !
1.4 1.3 0m 0t 1.2 I -
a a ... .a.. . ..]. . ....a.......
.. . ]... .. a - p...
........ a.. ....... . .. .... .. a..
... . .. .'a.... .. ... .. .... .. ..
1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 . 40 50 60 70 80 -90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow I Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.26 1.34 30.0 1.26 1.34
'50.0 1.20 1.27 72.0 1.20 1.20 100.0 1.20 1.20 109.5 1.20 1.20 Page 14 of 107 107LARRev. 1 Page14 o2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.1-lb. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION:1 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.5 SI* K 1.4 1.3 I I j I
... . .. I. . . . . . .. ., . . . .. I. . . ... . . . . . . .. . . . . . . , . . . . . .. -. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .-. . . . .
D.. ... .. . .. ,.. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i . . .. . . . .I . . . . . . ..- . . . .. . . .T. -. . . . ... L -i. . . . . . .J.. . . .. . .. .. .. . . .
..I. .......EoopAuto- --* .... ..... .....*-.....-..........
1.2 i *i * , i ! .- !
........ F........ - . 9....
. - - ! - . .. . . " ... ,y.. ..
1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)
Flow I Loop
(%Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.26 1.34 30.0 1.26 1.34 50.0 1.20 1.27 72.0 1.20 1.20 100.0 1.20 1.20 109.5 1.20 1.20 Page 15 of 107 Page15 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.1-2a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.5 - -I - * - -
. J.--.-..-... I 1.4 1.3
......... -...-...... - ...... .. ........ "....... ....... ~............
"......-........ * .. 1--1 C.,
1.2
" i.........
.....-.... ... q........... . .. .... .. ....... ....... . .p... .. . .. ...4
..... ..... ... .. q..... .. .. .. .*. .. .... . .
. ...... .. .i....... .. .. ..i...
0--oo 0 20ua 30- 40 50........ 60...0 0-- 90..... ..100... 110.....
1.1 1.0 Flow (%Rated)
Flow I . Loop
(%Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.26 1.34 30.0 1.26 1.34
,50.0 1.20 1.27 72.0 1.20 1.20 100.0 1.20 1.20 109.5 1.20 1.20 Page 16 of 107 Page16 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.1-2b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.5
- U, I - I - U I .1 1. .'
1.4
. I K - ItI 1.3 iI I I I C.,
1.2 I i I I
---'o~opi~aua - --- r,---- ---- .. . . * - I ... . .. - .. ...- ..... -......
. .- T -.. ... .... , ,., " .
1.1 -..... -..... ..- .. -. .... *- ..... 4 -.... L........ -.... .-. . -....
1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)
Flow I Loop
(%Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.26 1.34 30.0 1.26 1.34 50.0 1.20 1.27 72.0 1.20 1.20 100.0 1.20 1.20 109.5 1.20 1.20 Page 17 of 107 Page17 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.1-3a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.5 1.4 ..o... p ...... u.........
-...... ......... i ......... i..........i. . ...... .. . ........V.... .....i...............
1.3 -. II a-C.,
1.2
-........... *............... FF.........................
- ............................... ............................. "T...............
i i , i
... . ... i " i. t . . ..
1.1
II------I--- I 1.0 i
- !- - P- - ! -~ - - -
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow I Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.26 1.34 30.0 1.26 1.34 50.0 1.20 1.27 72.0 1.20 1.20
,100.0 1.20 1.20 109.5 1.20 1.20 Page 18 of 107 Page18 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.1-3b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.5 I I 1
- i r - - - - 1- - - 4 --------
, +------- 4 ,------
1.4
- I ]. ---. - '
. . . .-1.
1.3 1.2 ..-o.....
p- ut --, * ...-*i ..---* ---..,.. ..... ... . ......- ...... . r... . .. . . ..,-..
..... I... -. . . .
......... p....a . .. .. . . ... t....
- *1,_
- 4. . .. .. !. .... . . -.. .- ... - . f.. ..-......
. . i. . .. ... . .... .
1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow l Loop
(%Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.26 1.34 30.0 1.26 1.34 50.0 1.20 1.27 72.0 1.20 1.20 100.0 1.20 1.20 109.5 1.20 1.20 Page 19 of 107 107LARRev. 1 Page19 o2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.1-4a. OPERATING LiMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.5
. . . . . :. . .L..-:* ... [
1.4
-I---oop~Manu a I--, ...- ,
1.3 I .. ..... ... . . . . .
0t 1.2 SI I I I .
_. . . . ... . .. . . .... . . . . . . . . . .. - ~
.. ... ii. . . I.-. . . . .
1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow I Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 1.33* 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page20 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1 Page 20 of 107
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.1-4b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.5 LOOp Auto . .
1.4
...--Loop-Manual-. *i ' * *.. - '. .. ...... ......
1.3
................ ............... --...............- ..v . .... .
n-i i i4 1.2
. . .. . . ..*-...... ~~ j iI..
.. *...... .. . . .*. ... ........... _ _¢ ...... ....- --......---. -..... *---*---.......
1.1 , ) ,/1 ,
- I , I
.... ... ... .... .. ... ... ..- .... -.. .. . *...... . . ... .... . ... .. .... .. .. . . .. . . . .. . . ...-..... ...t .. . .. .. ..-. . .... . . ..i. ... . . .
1.0 0 10 20 30 40 *50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow I Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 .1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42
-72.0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 .1.27 Page 21 of 107 Page21 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.1-5a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: '5 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.5 Loop Auto i '*
- i i i i 1.4
--- oop Manuat , :.. .....
- -...... ....... i... ...
. . ... . . . .i . . . .........
.... ........... . " i-.. .... ..... .. ...... ..-.....,t........- ....
1.3 0t f.............*.............t----: ........*........----------------------.---.......---...........---............---...........
1C. ------------------------------...--- I---- j.
4..t.....
--....... . ... . ... ... . . . . . ... . . .. . . .. ]. . . . .. .. . . . .. . . . . . .. .. .. ...- . .... .. .
1.2 1.1 1 4--- -'
S 1 20 30 40 5 ............ 60...... 80...........90...............
70................... ..00........... 110..............
1.0 Flow (%Rated)
Flow I Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 i.33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page 22 of 107 Page22 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report Revision 1I
- Cycle 19 FIGURE 7.1-5b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: -5 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.5 U - .Ii - I - .
LoOP Auto, *i I 1.4
..- ....oo .pManual . ........ r-* - ...... . . .. .. . .*......* - - . . ..... ..* ..... !. . ...... t.. . .. .
-.-------.---.- . + --- I 1.3
- 1 £ A---- - i }-
LL 0.
C.,
1.2 1.1
. .. ..- - . ... . . ..- "... -... ..- ..- * . ... . .. . . . ....... i...-....
i ...... ....-- ..... . - ... ... .. . ... ... .... 1'* .. -
..... t. .. ... ..-
1.0 - - q- ~ -~ - - P- - - q- p-0 10 20 30 40 .'50 60 70 . 80 90 100 110 Flow, (%Rated)
Flow ] Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 1.09.5 1..27 1.27 Page 23 of 107 Page23 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1' FIGURE 7,t=6a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.5 Loop. Auto -,- .. !
1.4
...... Loop M anual- . ... . ..... .. - --.....
- r.. . ...
1.3 0m 0t 1.2 I .L.I......
1A1
- -................ q - . p - - q [
1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow l Loop
(% Rated) Manual Laoo Auto1 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27
- Page 24 of 107 PageAR201.5-01 4of107 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.1-6b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.5 Loop Auto L*: -----. ------- i
.... ....*.* .. ... ....- *. ! =, .... ... .... .. *...-...
1.4 Loop..... -M a... u... .-.. . ..... ....-.....--.... .... ,.........-........ -.. -........
- -...... L ........
I_*tt 1V C I ------ ; r
- '-- 1- - -- -----
1.3 IJ.
0* SI I I U3 1.2
. .1 I - . - . .....
..... F i ...........
..... .i...........
1.1
... L .. .. . . . L . . ... . . . . .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . .L .. . . .. . .. I . . .. ... .. .. {... .. .. . . ..
1 .0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow I Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42
.72.0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page 25 of 107 Page25 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGUR .E 7.1-7a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.5 Loop_ Auto : ,
1.4
oopManual*
1.3 U.
, I . i*-
- 10. ..*... ... . ... . .. ".. . . .. .-r. . ..... ..-. . . . . ..-.. . . . . . .. . . .
. . .. . .. . - . .. . .. . . ,. .. . .... I . .. . .. . .
0 1.2 I I}i I
1 .'1 ......... ....
.... .... . .. ....... * . .... "-* . . . . ... i . . .. . .. . .. .... . ... ... . . " ... ...... . .. .. . .,... .... ...
............. i.. 1 ... ... .... . .. .. ................ !......................
I - -I I - - I Sl I -,
1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 '90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)
Flow! Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page 26of 107 Page26of107LAR 2015-01 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.1-7b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.5 . - .- .- .- .- .- . -
.... ..... .................I.. . .* . .... ......... .... . .. . . ... . .
. ........ .....i. ... !.... ...... .. ......i! ...--. - .. *
.... . . . . .i . . . .. . .* . . . . . . ..i... . ... . . ... . . . . . ... .. .. . ... . ..
1.4
....---L Manual--' ,ioop. ........-
1.....
....... t *. . . --..... .....-.... .
1.3 LI. *.......*..... ......... .-- ......-- -. 4.... - ----- .1........ --- ....... ..-- .....--- _-,-.........--.-- ...................
,i- *........
- 0. -i---I ------ I-i i-1.2 ..... ... .-*. t. .. . - . . . . .. .. .,4.. . . .- .. ........ .. .... . - ........1 .. . .. . . . .i. . . .
i,!IiI I I .. ,...I., i~- i....
.. . . . . .i. . . . . . .. . . . . . .... -- . . ....-.....
. !... . I, .
... . ... ..L ... - .. .. . .. . .- . . . . .
1.1 4 II
' I II
.. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . .- . . . . . . .. . . . .+ . . . . ..... q .. ; .. . . . , . .-... . . . * .-... . . . " .. . . . .. .*. . .. . . . . *.. . . . . .
1 .0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 10 110 Flaw (%Rated)
Flow I Loop
(%Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 1,33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page 27 of 107 Page27 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision I FIGURE 7.2-la, OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPR~)
APPLICATION CONDITION: I EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC 3.0 2.8 ........I ... .
....-...... ....- - i.... ........ ............j.. ............... *......... . i. .. .. .. .. . .. ..i. .....
j...... .. ........
........ -...... ...... ].....= .*....... .. J....... L......... *............ L........~......
... ..... ]....... ~
2.6
- ... I..
2.4 2.2 n.2.0 I . ". 1 1.8 II I *'!II1
... .. ... . ... .. ...... t .. .... . .. .. .. . . ... . . .. .... . . . ..
1.6 ...... ...... !...........
r ............,..... ... ... ? ..... ........ -..............i .. . .....
S --.. 1 -- l--1.......
. -.. . . .. . .,-.. . .. . . . . ... . . ..... i. . . .. . .
1.4 - p q 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power S 50.0%
(%Rated). Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40.0 1.59 50.0 _____ 1.59 70.0 1.59 85.0 1.44 85.0 _____ 1.44 90.0 1.39 100.0 _____ 1.35 Page 28 of 107 Page28 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. .1
River Bend ,Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-lb. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION:
EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: SGNF3 2.8 .. ..... .
2.6 ............. :
2.4 2.2 '<
C.
2.0 1.8 .. . ... .
1.6 .........
1.4 1.2 ....... .
1.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power <*50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40.0 1.64 50.0 1.64 70.0 1.64 85.0 1.49 85.0 1.49 90.0 1.44 100.0 _____ 1.40 Page 29 of 107 Page29 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-Ic. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPR~)
APPLICATION CONDITION: I EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TC2I EOC P
3.0 t.II
- I I I I 2.8 I I II 2.6 III 2.4
. I ....
_....-i,! !
2.2 ~ , f T /
', i I Ii
' 2.0 1.8 jI I ,, ...
1.6 i ":.. . .. . . . .. .. *. .. .. ... i .. .. . i . ..- . .......... ..... . f. .. .. .. .
1.4 4 Ji'E 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 1.63 50.0- ____ 1.63 70.0 1.59 85.0 _____ 1.48 85.0 _____ 1.48 90.0 1.44 100.0 _____ 1.41 Page 30 of 107 Page30 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report -Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-Id. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: I EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8
............... r, [ - .. . . . . . . . .... ." . . . . . . . . -..- .. ........ ...... ......-... . .- . .-- .. . .. . .
2.6
.... ... . .. . . . . ..Z SI 1 I. . . . . ...,.. .. ..... . .*.. .. . ... . . . . . . . -,. . . . . ... . . ..-. .. . . . .. . . . . ... . ... ,.. . . .. . . .
2.4 2.2 I. I I 0.
n.2.0 ........
. . . . . . .. . . . . . .1 - * -- 1. . . . . . . 1. U. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .-. . . . . . . . ... . . . . . .. ,. . . . . . .
'I. - - I '*---*-
1.8 1.6
- . - 1iiiii -
-* ........~~---- -------------------------------------... . . .+...... ..... .. P . ....
- - q - - ! - p 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23:8 2.23 2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40.0 1.68 50.0 1.68 70.0 1.64 85.0 ___ __ 1.53 85.0 ___ __ 1.53 90.0 ___ __ 1.49 100.0 ___ __ 1.46 Page 31 of 107 Page31 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-2a.
OPRTN II MP ESSCR POE -_.R~
APPlICATION CONDITION:-2 I MOC 3.0 - .- p I p p I I I P p r................ * ..............
2.8
.. .....i ........ ..
.................. i...................
2.6 ............................i ...........................
- 5Q.0..EIco i 2.4 2.2 "N ..-. ~-.........-...~.--.
! ' i 0.
- , U.U/orIIO}W eu2.0
... i.... .......
1.8
...... i. ..... . ..... .......
1.6 I - I 1.4
{*.....j..........
..... "+,---- ' 4 ... . ~.... *.......*... ..........*.... .. ÷ . ... .......
1.2 ..... ... S--,.......,... . ...... .... ........... *.......... j....,.... ...........
- p q 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70. 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40.0 1.59 50.0 1.59 70.0 _____ 1.59 85.0 1.46.
85.0. _____ 1.46 90.0 1.42 100.0 _____ 1.39 Page 32 of 107 Page32 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. '1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report 'Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-2b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8 SI I 2.6
.... ..... *........L....
2.4
.~~.... . ......-4..--.I--.-...... ........ ..... ÷ ....... !. ..... L... ..
2.2
- - .. i -i a.2.0 1.8 .. .. .. ........ !. ... . .. . . ... .. -.. jI - .i . -
I I 1.6 1.4 I - I 4 F
- - - p - - p !
1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
- 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 -1.98 2.15 40.0 1.64 50.0 . .1.64 70.0 1.64 85.0 1.51 85.0 1.51 90.0 1.47 100.0 _____ 1.44 Page 33 of 107 Page33 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River 'Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-2c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: .2 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TCI EOC S FUEL--'TYPE: '< GNI 3.0 I r i -. - -i 2.8 .].... .. . .T .....-.-.-.-......- ....... ..........--- --................ .
SI , I I 2.6 I I 2.4
- ,50% FoW I ]i T'*
.... . ... .... ... i " ' .. . . .. . . . . I . .. . .. . . .. . . .. .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . . I. .-.. . . . . ... . ...... . . .. ..--. ...... . .....
2.2 .. ...... ... ....*....i.........
. .. . . .. ... .. . ...... .". .. . . . .. .. *. . . . . . . . ..... .. ..... .... . ...... .. ..... .. .. .. . .i.-........ .....
... .. ..... .. . .!.. .. .. ... ?. -* . .. .i * . . . .. . : . . . .. . .t.. . . .. . . * . . .. . .- ?I. . . -.. . . . . . .. . . ..-.. .. . . .
0~ 2.0 1.8
...................... i-i 1.6-t i 1.4- .............. ,...,....,?.
........... * ............. , ........... + ......... * ............. *........... * ...................... "!-
1.2
............... * ................................ F ........... "P.............
m m I I9 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 1.63
- 50.0 1.63 70.0 _____ 1.59 85.0 .1.51 85.0 1.51 90.0 1.48 100.0 ___ _ 1.44 Page 34 of 107 Page34 o2015-01107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-2d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 ........ *...... -, ..-.... ....... - -....... - ...
2.8
>50 F=v -I L. . .t- --
2.6 t -- *1---------
. '..~ F ' ' --- Z 2.4
- >50 F o~w * %, . J----- -- - . .... .. .......--..........-..-...........
2.2 .. . . . . ..-. . . . . . I... . . ... I.
- L. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . .. . . . .. . .. .
0.
a.2.0 1.8 , , s1- f
.i. . .. . . . . .!. . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .i . .. . . . . . . . . . .. .*. . .. . . . . . . . . . ..1. . . . .. . . .. . . . . .
.. .. .. .i.. . . . .. . . . .. . ..- . . .. ----. .. . .--..
.. .. .. . -i.
. . .. .q.. . . .. ..- . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . ..- .. . . .. . .
1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40.0 1.68 50.0 1.68 70.0 1.64 85.0 _____ 1.56 85.0 1.56 90.0 1.53 100.0 _____ 1.49 Page 35 of 107 Page35 o201 107LAR5-01 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-3a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp) 3 APPLICATION CONDITION:
i-u ~L-I-T r~:
3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2
- .2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power *
- 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40.0 _____ 2.09 50.0 1.95 70.0 _____ 1.75 85.0O ____ 1.64 85.0 _____ 1.42 90.0 _____ 1.39 100.0 _____ 1.35 Page 36 of 107 Page36 o201 5-01 Rev. 1 107LAR
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7,2-3b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 -
2.8 2.6 .....-........* 0 2.4 .. .......-
2.2 ....
- 1.8 - _ _
1.6 ,".... . ... . "... .
1.4 !
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40.0 _____ 2.14 50.0 ____ 2.00 700 ____ 1.80 85.0 _____ 1.69 85.0 _____ 1.47 90.0 _____ 1.44 100.0 _____ 1.40 Page 37of107 Page37 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision I FIGURE 7.2-3c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC
.. .... ;.... ... FU EL _I-ypE: . . . . .. . .. O;NF2. . . . ... .
3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 a 2.2 a.
01.
2.0 U..
1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10, 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 10 Power (% Rated)
Power _<50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 2.09 50.0 _____ 1.99 70.0 _____ 1.80 85.0 1.70 85.0 ___ __ 1.47 90.0 ___ __ 1.44 100.0 ___ __ 1.41 Page 38 of 107 Page38 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-3d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8 2.6 1 ...*...... 0 F~* . .-......... -....Sr---i ...................
-i . .... . ..
I
. . . . . .... ....t..... . .......i. ..... ... .
2.4
...... . . O.. ..%.. . .F. .o.
. . . .. . . . . . . . i. . . . . . ..
I*
. . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . .. . .i. . . . . . ... . . . . . . .
I---
2.2 a.2.0 II
..... ...- . .. .. "-........... T. ..
--...... I-...".
1.8
.... ... ..... .. ... .T,.. .. .. .. . ..-. .. '. .. .. ..
1.6
.... . .. .. ... . . ..,. ..* . . . . . . .i.. . .. . . .* . -.... .. . . .'. . . . . . - i. . ... .. . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . ..
1.4 , p - , -
1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40.0 2.14 50.0 2.04 70:0 1.85 85.0 1.75 85.0 1.52 90.0 1.49 100.0 _____ 1.46 Page 39 of 107 Page39 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-4a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPR~)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOCTC )MOC
_ i l r-=--_
ir'*- L* l 3.0 - .- .- .- , - .- .- .- .- .- I -
2.8 2.6 .. ......',I . ...o ...... . . .... . . . .. . . ... ... .. .. . . . .' .. . ... . . - --- ,---
[
2.4 2.2 .. .. ... .. .. .. .. . . . .. . . . .-.. . .. . .- . .. . . . . .- .. .- . . ,'+
.. .. .. . "--' -j. --. . --. .: --.
. . . . . . . .i-. . . .. . . . . .. . ..
. *....... ....-...... - ... I..- .-- ... ~ ....- ---....... ' ..........
I,1*
k........
I -
- a. 2.0 ....I .... .. -...
. ........ . +......... ....
- .. ... .......... . -. . . . . . ... I .... -....
.. . . . . +.. ........ ... .. i.... ... . . . . I. . ..... . ... ..-- . . .. ....- . .. .. ...
1.8
.. U 1.6 S-1.4
.. .. .... . . . ... . . .. . . . -. . . . . . . . . . . -- !p p -__+p. - ,
1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40.0 1.64 50.0 1.59 70.0 1.59 85.0 ___ __ 1.46 85.0 1.46 90.0 ___ __ 1.41 100.0 _____ 1.37 Page 40 of 107 Page40 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-4b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: 'BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8
>biY HOW ... !
2.6 2.4 7I507iIIF .o.---... . -
2.2 a.2.0
<R '*^* ,=. !o .. ..-.-... .......
- "% ...E~- .. . .... .. .... .. ... .t --.-.... I........i .... .
1.8
-- ------,--, I- !
1.6
- - ..... p - y --
1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40.0 1.69 50.0 1.64 70.0 1.64 85.0 -1.51 85.0 1.51 90.0 ___ _ 1.46 100.0 ___ _ 1.42 Page 41 of 107 Page41 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report-7 Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-4c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPR~)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC 3.0 2.8 I I 2.6 SI t I II1I II I 2.4
...... I 2.2 o,2.0 1.8 i . -, i ..
t..............i 1.6
...... ,....--- . .1 .
1.4 t !m ........ ,rn m m m m m' = pi 1.2 1.0
.0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power -<50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 1.66 50.0 1.65 70.0 _____ 1.61 85.0 1.51 85.0 1.51 90.0 1.47 100.0 _____ 1.43 Page 42 of 107 Page42 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-4d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 I - m- I ! I 2.8 .. .... +/---...
. ... ---.. ... ... ... .. ...4 . ... .. ... ...- + .. ... ... ..-. ... ...... ..
...... %FIoi *. i........-'...........J...................
2.6 i'* i i........................
2.4 x -------------. -.----.- ,... 4--.----
2.2 x
..,+ . ...- -4'... . .. .... . . . ..-
a-i
,,2.0 S---I----- 4 .------------
i S............ .. 4 .....
.......... .... .i...........
1.8 S1----I 1.6 .....................
1.4 1.2 .... ...
' -I
.4-F- ... ... ...
1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
- 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40.0 1.71 50.0 1.70 70:0 _____ 1.66 85.0 ___ __ 1.56 85.0 _____ 1.56 90.0 _____ 1.52 100.0 ____ 1.48 Page 43 of 107 Page43 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-5a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TC) MOC
- I-'lJt I'-L--- Iy IJ I- _. I ME--
I Vm* I nB mJ 3.0 2.8 i -- ...... . .- ~.- . . ---
......... - .. J~oi......... ... ......t.... .. . "....
-.. . +........ . .
2.6 2.4 2.2 0.
m 2.0 1.8 I-!i -
-I
- -11 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40.0 1.64 50'*0 1.59 70.0 _____ 1.59 85.0 _____ 1.49 85.0 _____ 1.49 90.0 _____ 1.45 100.0 ____ 1.41 Page 44 of 107 Page44 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-5b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8 .-. I I i *I -
2.6 i I "li! I i.
.,.- - ..... T......... :..... .... 1........... i.--...
2.4
! ; ---x ------
2.2 0.
a.2.0 I ' *iI p - I 1.8 ........
7..%-tiv_* .---
'=
- I
'qli. I i -
--1-i [- -
1.6 .. .. .. .. ..!.. .. .. ..--. .. ..-- ..- - . -i---
,-- .. . .... .. . . . . .. .... . .. .. ... ... i-.. .. . .... T .... .. . .. i.. . .. .. . ..--I . . .. ..-
, ! q .--
i .*,--I.I...
- .. .. .......- . ....... . p......... q -....... ....... ........ t .....
1.4 1.2 1.0o 0 10 20 30 40 50 .60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power S 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow ,>50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40.0 1.69 50.0 .1.64 70.0. 1.64 85.0 1.54 85.0 1.54 90.0 1.50
'100.0 . 1.46
- Page 45 of 107 LAR 2015-01 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-5c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPR~)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO I EOC
~I I~! *rlJ~~. - V~PJE t~~1If~. . . _________________________________________
3.0 - I - I - I I - - - I I in17in - .
2.8 4- - - +/- -.
2.6
- >50%.'/o FIc 2.4
...... i ....
2.2
- ,OU UVo I-ic3 xN C.,
1.8 ii I
1.6
..............................i...................................................
1.4 ..................... I".................... i.........................
1.2 I
i---- - - - - -- i ! '
I
! ----- :i- - -* - ! ------
1.0 . ] - ] - - L - . - '
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 : 1.66 50.0 _____ 1.65 70.0 1.61 85.0 1.54 85.0 1.54 90.0 1.51 100.0 _____ 1.46 Page 46 of 107 Page46 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-5d: OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 ExPoSURE RANGE: M OC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: .GNF3 3.0 2.8 ........... ....... ....,.....-.- . .t -
2.6
.-... . -... ........... ..................-......-. ... -... . . - .................. !..I................ . ...........
> HOW I ~ I . , . ",
2.4 ........ OQ ..
. k*...--....* ..... ......
.. ....... ~ .,,-.. i i i 2.2
.. I I f--.
- . . i.....
.o.2.0 1.8 1.6 I .-.... ..... . . ... . . . . .*! .
... ... . .. . . . .. .. . . .... ... i... . . . .
1.4
.... ,....j . -
.1.2
- 9 - 4 -!i !i P 4 9 -
1.0 0 10 , 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1'00 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
- 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 ,2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40.0 1.71 50.0 _____ 1.70 70.0 _____ 1.66 85.0 _____ 1.59 85.0 1.59 90.0 _____ 1.56 100.0 _____ 1.51 Page 47 of 107 Page47 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1.
FIGURE 7.2-6a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC I" ~L-Ii rL:
IU ) MOO
-2 3.0 I I - I a a I 2.8 2.6 - I - . j . 4 . . . ' ........ ......
2.4 2.2 ... ..-.... I.. .-..- --.. - .. - i
,,2.0 1.8
--I 1 " . 4 i+ _ i . .
1.6 --*-' * ' '- - d *9 -" ! - , I- ,-
'..1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40.0 2.09 50.0 1.95 70.0 1.75 85.0 1.64 85.0 1.44 90.0 1.41 100.0 _____ 1.37 Page 48 of 107 Page48 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-6b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: .6 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 I m. ml mu 1 2.8 .......... .4................
4-............... -i................ *-...............
-- >50 Fl
.............I ...............
i 2.6 4 I
... ... .. . .. . ..Fl.. . *,. . . . . . . ..} . . . . . .
2.4 - -
2.2 E I 0.
- .2.0 :i: : i: :i: i i i i i ilL L I *
..................... ........................... !I . ... 4..................................
~~~---.......
1.8 . .
- ... . .*--i .......................... i...................... ...
1.6
................... i..........................i..................... i I
- i 1.4 1 -.
J - II- - -.- I - -I 1.2 I
.............. ............... ...- I.-.. ...... . -. . ..... * ... -...... II-- - -
1.0 ' I .. . . ... i " 1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40.0 2.14 50.0 2.00, 70.0 1.80 85.0 1.69 85.0 1.49 90.0 1.46 100.0 _____ 1.42 Page 49.of 107 Page49of107LAR 2015-01 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-6c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TC SEOC
-FUEL-T'YPE: . .. ....- . GN!
3.0 2.8
..... i. . . ... .. .. l.. .. ......... ................ . . .... ..... ........
2.6
- . ?....
5.0%_Eo . " v"... -.... ........................................... ..... i . "L. .
2.4 2.2 0t .............................
0-2.0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~.
.......... "I-r........ *-0O 4.".....7... .. ....
I.I 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 I - i m , - , - p - - 9 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated),
Power <_50.0%
(% Rated) .Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 2.09 50.0 1.99 70.0 1.80 85.0 1.70 85.0 1.51 90.0 1.47 100.0 _____ 1.43 Page 50 of 107 Page50 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-6d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: . 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 I i 2.2
- a. 2.0 i I-Jii 1.8 I i ItI
.. ....... :......... -. . . ..- . . . . ...... .... . ... d... ... . . -....... . -. .. .. 9-, . ... . .i .. .- . .4 . .. -.. .
1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40.0 2.14 50.0 2.04 70.0 _____ 1.85 85.0 _____ 1.75 85.0 ___ __ 1.56 90.0 _____ 1.52 100.0 ___ _ 1.48 Page 51 of 107 Page51 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-7a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO )MOC
-FU EL--'t'PE:: GNf 3.0
- p - t I i !
2.8 2.6 o- . . . . . . . . ...... .*.i..i* . .
II.. " -.- ......... !. . . .
2.4 2.2 i I I 0* i. .. .. .. .. .. .'
- 0. 2.0
..... . 7 . .. . . . . j.......
.....I . ......... ... . T...... ..... .... :..., ... ..
1.8
.. .. .... ... .... .. .... .... ..- -................ . -........... i .. . .... ........ r... . ...
1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 6,0 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
- 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40.0 2.09 50.0 1.95 70.0 1.75 85.0 1.64 85.0 _____ 1.47 90.0 1.45 100.0 _____ 1.41 Page 52 of 107 Page52 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-7b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 i m - p p i p 2.8
.. ,j .. ... ... ..... ... .... . . . ... =.. .. . . . . 1. .... i . , .. . . . ... ... . . . . .
2.6 2.4 2.2 a.2.0 1.8 I ....-. . '..-..---.
1.6 1.4 i - ." , i.-
.............. Y -...-.......-...... - -......... . . .....- . . . -.............
1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
(%Power < 50.0%Fo-Rated) Flow >50% Fo 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40.0 2.14 50.0 2.00 70.0 .1.80 85.0 _____ 1.69 85.0 1.52 90.0 _____ 1.50 100.0 ____ 1.46-Page 53 of 107 Page53 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-7c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TC:)EOC FUEL-1YPE:' GNI F9 3.0 2.8
. ".........o . .. . . . - .. .... - ..........- .. .. ... ..... - .... . ... .. -...... .1. .. .-.. .. . ..
2.6 i I! --- {I---- I i 2.4 2.2 .1 .1 I..
0.
. . . . . . . . . . . ." . . . . . . .1.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .f. . . . . . . . . . . . . .t . . . . . . . . . . . .!. . . . .
- .2.0 1.8 "i--------.-I---I 1 :- -.
. . . . .p.. . .. .
. ... . . . -... m-*. .. ..-... . p . -.. . .. . r .. . .. . . . .... . . q.. . . . . . . . . . . ..i* . . . .
1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 %
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1O00 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 2.09 50.0 _____ 1.99 70.0 1.80 85.0 1.70 85.0 ___ __ 1.54 90.0 ___ __ 1.51 100.0 ___ __ 1.46 Page 54 of 107 Page54 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-7d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.6 ............ *50 2.2 a.
0*
C., 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 '2.03 2.15 40.0 2.14 50.0 2.04 -
70.0 1.85 85.0 1.75 85.0 _____ 1.59 90.0 _____ 1.56 100.0 _____ 1.51 Page 55 of 107 Page55 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.2-1a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 1.0 0.8
- ='0.6
-I-
.1
.0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 56 of 107 Page56 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.2-lb. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: I FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 10 --
0.8
-* Loop
,oO.6 U-0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50; 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 57 of 107 107LARRev. 1 Page57 o2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.2-2a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 1.0 0.8 0O.6 IL.
0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 58 of 107 Page58 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision I FIGURE 8.2-2b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 -
1.0 ... ...
0.8 ... -....
-- Loop IL . 6 ... ......
..1 0.4 .. . ...
0.20-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 59 of 107 Page59 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.2-3a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 II II Ii I I I 1.0 0.8 I i --A-f"
- i Loop Manual I *iiiiiiii d 0.6 - -. i1 ii L.. . p..
... A,.to,-Loo....
' . .~.
+-.... ...............---- ....
i~l.J ** I"*u.--- -
-J 0.4
, ii ii i . I*.
0.2 II~~E I. - ' t -
0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500
- 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 60 of 107 Page60 o201 107LAR 5-01 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.2-3b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 FUEL TYPE: -GNF3 1.2 1.0 ..... ..i...
0.8
-* Loop iMar
,-J
,I 0.4 .. . .. . . ...
0.2 ......... . ..
0.0 m y
,110 Flow (%Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 61 of 107 Page61 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1I FIGURE 8.2-4a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 SFUEL TYPE: GNF2 1 .2 m..a .. m m ..... m i
!i i * {I.
- i i t i i 1.0 !
- i./ -i r - m
.............. ........ .... i....... . ......
}-
E i I '
0.8 .............. -F.....
P Loop 'Manual a m !
0 U.
0.6 I /iil iii ---------------------------------------------------------
U-
.........L. oop..Auto.-a m i C,
=
-I 0.4 I =
i 0.2
-i....................... [..........................
0.0 !I - , Im - p - q - p i 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 62 of 107 LAR 2015-01 Rev. 1
.2
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.2-4b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flaw (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 0.8
-- Loop Mar
,-j 0.4 .. . .... . .
0.20 ---
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 63 of 107 2015-01 Page63 o 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits* Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1, FIGURE 8.2-5a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 FUEL TYPE:. GNF2 1.2 1.0 0.8 4.) 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flaw (%Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 64 of 107 Page64 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.2-5b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1.0-0.8
-- Loop iMar U--
~~1 ..... .4. .
0.4 00-yi 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 65 of 107 Page65 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.2=6a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFAC*)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 1.0 0.8
~0.6 C,-
0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20:3.0 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% ,l~oop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 66 of 107 Page66 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8,2-6b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: .6 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 - . I I I I I I I
-i ---- a.----
1.0 0.8 Loop iManual
,,30.6 7..
-- L p ut I I 0.4
. ~---- ~-.t---------------------------------
i..----.-.i----.i---I--------------------
- - -- I-.--- --------i.- -------t.- ---
0.2
- -
- i 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 67 of 107 107LARRev. 1 Page67 o2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.2-7a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flaw (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 ,. .-- I ,.
- . pI I i n .
1.0- 1 0.8-Loop Mlvanual m m i. *' ! ! ! , ...............i ..........................
~0.6 i
...... .... i .........
............ I...............
-I 0.4 SI I 1 0.2
-*i--
0.0 I m I I I m I m I m I I I I I 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 90 100 110 80 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% Loop.
Rated) Manual' Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 1"09.5 1.000 1,000 Page 68 of 107 107LARRev. 1 Page68 o2015-01
River RevisionBend1 Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 FIGURE 8.2-7b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: "7 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 m 1.0 ........
0.8 .. ......-
-* Loop 04.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% LooP..
Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 69 of 107 Page69 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-1a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC 1.2
- p pI I i I I I 1.0 I , i I
!t. .............
0.8 i .- ...... - . - . .. i. ..... .... .. +...... .......
.'%FIo~W~ .
a-
~0.6 0.4
- - - -I 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 .30 "40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power < .5cX0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 ___ __ 0.840 50.0 ___ __ 0.89T 70.0 ___ __ 0.995 85.0 ___ __ 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 ___ __ 1.000 Page 70 of 107 Page70 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report Revision 1
- Cycle 19 FIGURE 8.3-lb. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: I EXPOSURE RANGE: ,BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 -
1 .0 ......... .- ...
0.8 S0.6 .......
CJ L
0.4 .... *....
0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 ___ __ 0.897 70.0 ___ __ 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 ___ __ 1.000 100.0 ___ __ 1.000 Page 71 of 107 Page71 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-1c. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFAC~)
APPLICATION CONDITION: I EXPOSURE RANGE: MOCTOEOC 1.2 m1pp i i i "i.............T.............. -i".............
i i i, i; i l !
1.0 i::-* ..................!....................... I I - U
- ! i
, FloW
.......... , .. . .F..
.. . .. . . .. . . T .. .. . .. ..T . .. .. .. . ------------4 0.8 1 i i
, 0.6 i . i I ,
t !
I I 0.
i i i I i i
~0.2
! ... . Ia :i......
0.4 II! 1 .. ..... ...4. ..... -........ 4 ....-...... .
... ... .... . . 4
...... ......... . . .... *.............. . N
-...... ....-.. . ... 4 . .. .... .... ...- ... . . ..... .........
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80.* 90 1O00 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
- 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 ____ 1.000 Page 72 of 107 2015-01 Rev. 1 Page 2 of107LAR
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1I FIGURE 8.3-Id. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 -i -
1.0
!I it{
0.8
- . L I ! - -
0.6 0..
............ i .-.---..
0.4 - 09 F- --. -- 9po 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50,0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 73 of 107 Page73 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8,3-2a, OPERA-'TING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE.POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL-TYPE: .. .. . .. . "rGNF2 . .. . . .
1 .2 - . - u n -
1..---... . . . . . . IIi
........ T..... .. ........ i......... ..... ... T............
uE *............................
u!I.. i*....~...
I... t 08.1 .I . . I . . . . . .,..* . . . . . .
a1.
0.6 UI-
-j 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power _<50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0,687 40.0 _____ 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 _____ 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 74 of 107 Page74 o201 107LAR 5-01 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle. 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-2b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 -
0.8
,< 0.6 .......
U--
0.4 ........
0 .2 ............
0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 75 of 107 Page75 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-2c. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC
..... . ...... * .. .. 'FUEL'--'YPE : .. . .... .. .. . ... * .. . -GNF2 ,
1 .2 - - m
,----- _____ _ I
- 1. -.......... i ....... :i.......... ................ -.. L....t....... *...~. -.-...-.- -.
. , I 1 0.8.. - I" .. 2 .
C.,
0.6 U--
-j 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
- 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 ___ __ 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 ______ 0.999 90.0 ___ __ 1.000 100.0 ___ __ 1.000 Page 76 of 107 Page76 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-2d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6
-J 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 _____ 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 77 of 107 Page77 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-3a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC 1.2 1.0 0.8 CD 0.6
.-j 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 . 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 ____ 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 0.820 85.0 ____ 0.869 90.0 1.000 100.0 ____ 1.000 Page 78 of 107 Page78 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-3b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 0.8 0.6 a=
n1 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 ____ 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 0.820 85.0 0.869 90.0 1.000 100.0 ____ 1.000 Page 79 of 107 Page79 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-3c. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC
. ... ""FUEL-TYP-E: . .... . .. GNF2. . .
1_2 u - p p p I I I I I I IiI !1I i 1 i
- i 1.0 I
i
........................t ............................ *............... .........
---T A"-I-.
0.8 SIi i i
- l i a.9 0.6 U-.
_1 0.4
......................... i ........................
I .........................i..........................
0.2 ....................?...................
........................ J..........................
i
........................... i ....... "r....... i k i
...................... j............................. ......................... i.....................
-I i
0.0 - !- - p- q- P- - - P-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0:739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 ____ 0,688 50.0 ____ 0.738 70.0 ____ 0.818 85.0 0.869
,90.0 1.000
- 100.0 1.000 Page 80 of 107 Page80 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report -Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-3d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2
- I -,*.
1.0 0.8 0.
0.6 U--
.-I 0.4
- q - . *- - - - - q -
- 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 _____ 0.818 85.0 0.869 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 81 of 107 Page81 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision I FIGURE 8.3-4a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC
'. ... .FUEL-TYPE: ...: .... .. . . (I* M * .
1.2 1.0 0.8 (30.
0.6 U-,
z
.. I 0.4 0.2, 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 _____ 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 82 of 107 107LARRev. 1 Page82 o2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-4b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC'TO MOC FUEL TYPE: ; GNF3 1.2 mm 0.8 06 0.0
-II 020 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 , 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 ____ 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 0.999, 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 83 of 107 Page83 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-4c. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL-T'YPE:-....... .... GNE2____________
1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.)
<0.6 0.4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power *; 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 ____ 0.840 50.0 ____ 0.897 70.0 ____ 0.995 85.0 ____ 0.999 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 ____ 1.000 Page 84 of 107 Page84 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-4d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.z 1
- I I -
- I p- U -,.
.- '* .i. ; --
0.8
- 5oo% FloWv 0.
0.6 ......50%"F1* - r
-j 0.4 i _
}
- , 4
- I i
....................... i....................... "i"...................
0.2
............................................ i....................
' i 0.0 p I' - - [ - "
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 ' 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.B48 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 85 of 107 107LARRev. 1 Page85 o2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision I FIGURE 8.3-5a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFAC~)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC
~~NF2 1.2 i
- m i p p p * -
1.0 0.8 - -------- '.- - .] I 4-.-- -
0.6 i { , , * ................
0.4
.(0.6
.1 1. I 1---- I ' I 0.4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60-" 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power _<50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 ____ 0.897 70.0 ____ 0.995 85.0 ____ 0.999
,90.0 ____ 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 86 of 107 Page86 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-5b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.
0.6 C,9
,-J 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
.... ' Power (%Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 _____ 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 87 of 107 Page87 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-5c. OPERA-TING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC
-FLUJFL--'IY"-PF . . . . . .. .. GNF2 1.2
' 1 II _
, 'I I ,
1.0
.. .. . .. T .. .-..... .. ... . .. ....-. ... ..
i..-.-i . . . .. .T. ... . . . . . .i. .. .... .. . ..
0.8
-t -i I - - ,- - - -i C.,
I -
C.-,
0.6 - . -*1.
.-- ... ... -.............. .. . ....... I-----....- .... ....--...........--. . ......--... .......-. .......... ............ 1.......-....
0.4 II~o Fpo-i I y -
I 0.2 0.0 0 10. 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power ___50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848, 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 ____ 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 88 of 107 Page88 o2015-01107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-5d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5S EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TOEOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 - . pI* p .p 1.0 I.. J.. .... .. . . .. ..'-- . . . . .. .. . .........--
. . .J .. -. . . . .. 1 . . . - . . . .. .*. . . . . . . . . .
0.8 II ((( I I I - ----- .1...-- - -- -- ---- .) --.-- - .- -*--
0 0.6 U-0
~1 II I m o% F-----------------------II
-I--o 0.4
-I - , Lq -" - 9 - q 9 Y - -I 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 *50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power -<50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.840.
50.0 _____ 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 0,999 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 89 of 107 Page89 o2015-01Rev 107LAR 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-6a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC
-FUEL--TYPE: ... . NE2 1.2 U .- .- .- .- .- .a .a .a
÷.......... 4.............. +;_
1.0 -----------------------------------
vE- - i i 0.8
- a. -. *o5o% Fluov
<0.6
-IL 0.4 -*. ....... .-....... .. ...- + --.. .-.. --.......
.. ..... i i.........÷.......
t 0.2 I. . . . . ii. . . . :i . . . . . . . . . . . .
J 0.0 as as a! apa 5a pa 1 1 0 .10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power _<50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 0.820 85.0 0.869 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 90 of 107 Page90 o2OI5-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-6b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOG TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 m 1.0 S0.6 C,.
C 0.0 -
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Fiow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.688.
50.0 _____ 0.738 70.0 0.820 85.0 0.869 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1,000 Page 91 of 107 107LARRev.
Page91 o2015-01 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 1.9 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-6c. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC
- FUEL-1YPE: .... . ..... NF_2' 1 .2 u. , u .. mm u..m
- um 1.0-
.. --.. - . ....... --.. .. .. .. .. ... . . .l!i=-
-I ------ *-- *--- l-- - 4- -
-V 0.8 0.
-I, I I I
,,*0.6 . . . . .- 1.
4 I
- ii U- . .. . . > 0 /-F-i - . ... T . .. . .... r.... ... i. . ...... r..... . .. r. ...... ............. ! .. .... .. ..... ..
0.4 m m p 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1O00 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0O ____ 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 0.818 85.0 ' 0.869 90.0 1.000 100.0 ____ 1.000 Page 92 of 107 Page92 o2015-01107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-6d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2
- I S- - I - - , S *,, S 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 . .... O ..- ........ .L.. .... .. . .....---..-. . -- _ ...- .-.---- -. _i _.. ..---
- ...--... .-......... - - - - ...-.,. . .. . .. . . .. . .-- L7 .. .i -
0.7 FloW-V-------.-
S>50%
0.
0.6 U--
0.5 ' * *1...........................
-I 0.4 i L
- I . i..
0.3 - - qo - -
0.2 0.1 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 _____ 0.688 50.0 -, 0.738 70.0 0.818 85.0 0.869 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 93 of 107 Page93 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-7a OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL--TYPE: GNF2 1.2 1.0 0.8 C.9, 0.6 U--
,CI 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 0.820 85.0 ______ 0.869 90.0 ____ 1.000 100.0 ____ 1.000 Page 94 of 107 Page94 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-7b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 SF ,u t U 1.0 0.8 0~
- lI I *1I I 0
0.6 IL C,
=
~1 0.4
.....7....
....-.......-... . . . . J ..-..-..
- I' .I .... I
- * - : - - - p 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 ____ 0.820 85.0. 0.869 90.0 ____ 1.000 100.0 ____ 1.000 Page 95 of 107 Page95 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. I
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-7c. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL-TYRPE: "' ( NF2 1.2 . - p - c p - I -
1.0 r ...................... *........... I.
T............. *................. r...............
iiiiii 0.8
- <50.0% FIc
,*0.6 C.)
<0.6 I '
0.4
- q - - I - I * ! - i 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
SPower < 50.0%
(.%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592
.40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 _____ 0.738 70.0 0.818 85.0 .869 O____
90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 96 of 107 Page96 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-7d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFAC*)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2
- U I I . .~
1.0 i -7........"] ....
..i ................ ....T....... .... i . .... .... ....r ....... ... ... .... ........ .... ..... .... .... ... ....... ....
t 0/iW~~- i i ! .... i. -
0.8 I i -i-- - -----]-
.-- .-- I- -',/
---A.----- -- i #'-*i 0.6 U--
-I ,
- i . . L _.... ......... ... ..... . ...
0.4
... . . ...- . -. . . . . 9
.I.... ... . . .. . . . 9*.... .. .. . ...... ....- . .. .. .. .
0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 0.818 85.0 0.869 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 97 of 107 107LARRev. 1 Page97 o2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 Figure 9.t-1: Monitored Region Boundary (Case 1) 120 110 100 90 80 "70 a- GO
,50 wJ 40 0
0J 30 20 10 0
80 90 100 110 CORE FLOW (% rated)
Page 98 of 107 Page98 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 Figure 9.1 -2: Monitored Region Boundary (Case 2) 920 U* :o. . .. -;.... .......... ....
o, 10 , , , i ___
0 10 2.0 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 CORE FLOW (% rated)
Page 99 of 107 Page99 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 Figure 9.1-3: APR14 Flow Biased Simulated Thermal 'Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted Region Boundary (Two Recircula~tion Loop Operation - Case 4) 120 I I I I I I I I
- * - $- - -4 110 ... .- 4 ...- .. -- ..-4... -....
.- .-4.... . .4.. -... .- .A..-.. ... .. ... .. .. ... .. .-
100-I I o ina au 90* *
- - - - - - - - - ._I. I_ . .. , . ...
80- "I F -- ... .. I" I Allow .b . Value .I.. . .. ".. . .
7 0-II '
LtI 60-0 / I... R.trited.gio ta- 60 OL 4oT- - -i -- egon4 -d ......
-- - - --- 4 - +------.r....,....-4--
40.
30.
20, I II
L-F.. . "4. . . .÷. .. . II ....i... Iii ii l
. .I . J -. . .L-. .. . ... ...- . -L... .. .
10.
0 tO 20 30 40 80 50 70 80 90 100 11*0 120 AUIGNED DRIVE FLOW (% rated)
LAR 2015-01 Rev. 1 Page 100 of 107
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 Figure 9.-4: APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted Region Boundary (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2)
,oo *I I I I I i-I __ . . . . .
0ii*
- I*-i- -. -~ __ I S i ....... . - !
AL1..4E ORIV F .O r.e Page 101 of 107 2015-01 Page 01 o107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 Figure 9.1-5: APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted Region Boundary (Single Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1) 17 IIIIII I I I I I II I I I I 11 I III I 2I I I I I I I I I I- _ I-I iII I I I I I I 10 S
e I I a 20= es rite Reio C
4,4
'-7 IIIII IIII I I 0 .... I I. " 'I..
a.
0 I ,I ' fI" I ? I I I i . IIII 0 I I I I I I I I A . . . -I.. . . . T . . . I- . . . - . . . TI. . . . I. . . . "1 - r . . . . .
I , I I I I I I I o II , I II 1
0 10 20 30 40 50 50 70O 50 50 100 110 120 AUGNED DRIVE FLOW (% rated)
Page 102 of 107 Page 02 2OI5-01 o107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 Figure 9.1-6: APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power -. High Scram Setpoints and Restricted Region Boundary (Single Recirculation Loop Operation -.Case 2) "
0
- . 4 A
- i * ** ". *3/4 .
Page 103 of 107 Page 03 o 107LAR 2015-01 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Care Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision I Figure 9.1-7: APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1) 120 110]
100 I I I 90 I I II1I 80 I II1 ..- rII I=
I IIIII ' II I I
.I.
I
-I. . .
I
-- --- -- -- I ... s S tu -I-B oc -- . i -
I I I No-Stu Ro-lc I S70 IIIIII - I1II I n- / -TI r I I 60 Ili S50 IIII I I I I I I I 0* I I I I t I I I I I I C- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ".I 40 30 20 10-0 i l = I ' f I ' I ' I ' ' I
' I I , I ' I 0 10 20 30 411 60 60 70 50 00 100 110 120 AUGIGNED DRiVE FLOW (%4 rated)
Page 104 of 107 Page 04 o 2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 Figure 9.1-8:. APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2) i a ' ......... i.
t a:: .. " - * ! ! ___
- .... . ...... ...... . * ' - I-i_ ,--
' !AL .i _ _,oov*
a:I /
2'j-A1IGNE* OiliVS FLOW l*rot)
Page 105 of 107 LAR 2015-01 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 Figure 9.1-9: APRNT FLow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Single Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1) 120 90 I IIIi I I IiII I
- "80- I I I I . I Il I I I I I
-,/I I I s I tu Ro-lk I
/INo-I/
, I
-. ,i - -I.___ IIIII II I
[ - - L - I - .- - - - 4I. - I - . I 40 3-20 40 0 10 20 30 40 50 80 70) 80 20 1*0 110 120 AUIGNED DRIVE FLOW (% rated)
Page 106 of 107 LAR 2015-01 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 Figure 9.1-10: APRM Flow Bhased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Single Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2)
- Q 0+/-
LU~
a 0.
a o ~.
- ~ I
- ALiGNED Qf~iVE FLOW (%rated~
Page 107 of 107 Page 07 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
Entergy Operations, Inc.
River Bend Station O-Entergy 5485 U.S. Highway 61 N St. Francisville, LA 70775 Tel 225-381-4177 Joseph A. Clark Manager, Regulatory Assurance January 18, 2016 RBG-47635 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
Nineteenth Fuel Cycle Core Operating Limits Report, Revision 1 River Bend Station - Unit 1 Docket No. 50-458 License No. NPF-47
Dear Sir or Madam:
Enclosed is Revision 1 of the River Bend Station (RBS) Core Operation Limits Report (COLR) for the nineteenth fuel cycle. This report is submitted in accordance with Technical Specification 5.6.5 of Appendix A of the Facility Operating License NPF-47.
This letter does not contain any commitments.
For further information, please contact me at (225) 381-4177.
cc: Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV 1600 East Lamar Blvd.
Arlington, TX 76011-4511
/ 00/
RBG-47635 Page 2 of 2 NRC Senior Resident Inspector P. 0. Box 1050 St. Francisville, LA 70775 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Mr. Stephen S. Koenick MS 8 B1A One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852 Department of Environmental Quality Office of Environmental Compliance Radiological Emergency Planning and Response Section Ji Young Wiley P.O. Box 4312 Baton Rouge, LA 70821-4312 Public Utility Commission of Texas Attn: PUC Filing Clerk 1701 N. Congress Avenue P. 0. Box 13326 Austin, TX 78711-3326 RBF1 0192
Core Operating Limits Report Cycle 19 Revision 1
3eZn1t9o
'or 0rtehJriaiH Page 1 of 107 Page1 of107LAR 2O15-01 Rev. 1
RepTORt Yce1 Bnd RivrtatonoreOpRatngLiItSIO REVISION HISTORY P.eVlSlOrI-ue_*cr!_*!! On ..... ...........
-Kev-islon . ...
I -'wvision--- i- KAvIsIon-uQscflrnIc~n -
0 Original Issue 1 Editorial change to: 1) Correct Figures 7.1-la through 7.1-7b to change the graph vertical axis label from MCPRP to MCPRF consistent with the figure title and input reference data, and correct the heading of the first column on the associated table located below each graph from Power (%Rated) to Flow (% Rated); 2) Correct Figures 8.2-1a through 8.2-7b to change the graph vertical axis label from LHGRFACP to LHGRFACF consistent with the figure title and input reference data. 3) Replaced duplicate Figure 8.2-4b on page 62 with the correct Figure 8.2-4a including vertical axis label correction described in item 2. 4) Added omitted figure number and first line of title to Figure 8.3-6b on page 91 and Figure 8.3-6c on page 92.
Page 2 of 107 Page2 of107LAR 2015-01 Rev..1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - CyCle 19 Revision 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PURPOSE ....................................................................................... 4 2.0 SCOPE ............................................................................................ 4
3.0 REFERENCES
...................... .......... .................... ,............................ 4 3.1 CURRENT CYCLE REFERENCES ........................... ,.................................................................4 3.2 METHODOLOGY REFERENCES................"............................................................................. 4 4.0 DEFINITIONS,.....................................................................;........... ;.... 4 5.0 CORE DESIGN .................................... ................................................
5.1 REFERENCE CORE LOADING PATTIERN ....................................................... ..... ....................... 7 5.2 CONTROL RODS............................................................................................................. 7 6.0 AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (APLHGR) ................. 7 7.0 MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPR)............................................... 7 7.1 FLOW-DEPENDENT MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPRF) VALUES:............................................ 7 7.2 POWER-DEPENDENT MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPRp) VALUES:................8 8.0 LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (LHGR)............................................... 8 8.1 EXPOSURE-DEPENDENT LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (LHGR) VALUES:................8 8.2 FLOW-DEPENDENT LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE FACTORS (LHGRFACF) VALUES:............................ 9 8.3 FLoW-DEPENDENT LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE FACTORS (LHGRFACF) VALUES:............................ 9 9.0 STABILITY....................................................................................... 9 9.1 STABILITY REGION BOUNDARIES AND SETPOINTS...........................,........................................... 10 9.2 APRM FLOW BIASED SIMULATED THERM*AL POWER-HIGH TIME CONSTANT (SR 3.3.1.1.14).....................11 Page 3 of 107 2015-01 Page3 of107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1
... . ... ..1.0 .. ...PURPo s ElY- .. . . .. . . . . ~ - - . .. . . . - . . . .' - . . . . .. . .. . . . .. .
The COLR is controlled as a License Basis Document and revised accordingly for each fuel cycle or remaining portion of a 'fuel cycle. Any revisions to the COLR must be submitted to the NRC for information as required byTech Spec 5.6.5 and tracked by RBS License Commitment LI11358.
2.0 SCOPE As defined in Technical Specification 1.1, the COLR is the document that provides the core operating limits for the current fuel cycle. This document is prepared in accordance with Technical Specification 5.6.5 for each reload cycle using NRC-approved analytical methods.
The limits included in this report are:
- 4) LCO 3.2.4, Fraction of Core Boiling Boundary (FCBB)
- 5) LCO 3.3.1.1, RPS Instrumentation (RPS), Function 2.b
- 6) LCO 3.3.1.3, Periodic Based Detection System (PBDS)
3.0 REFERENCES
This section contains the background, cycle-specific, and methodology references used in the current cycle reload analysis.
3.1 Current Cycle References 3.1.1 ECH-NE-14-00048 Revision 0, Supplemental Reload Licensing Report for River Bend Station -
Unit 1 with GNF3 - Unit I Reload 18 Cycle 19.
3.1.2 ECH-NE-14-00049 Revision 0, Fuel Bundle information Report for River Bend Station - Unit I Reload 18 Cycle 19.
3.1.3 Letter, R. E. Kingston to G. W. Scronce, "Time Constant Values for Simulated Thermal lpower Monitor", RBC-46410, November 30, 1995.
3.1.4 RBS Updated Safety Analysis Report..
3.1.5 ECH--NE-15-00004, Revision 0, "RBS C19 GESTAR Assessment" 3.2 Methodology References The Technical Specifications (TS) supported by each methodology reference are provided in brackets.
The following are applicable to GNF supplied fuel.
3.2.1 NEDE-2401 1-P-A, General Electric Standard Application for Reactor Fuel (GESTAR-II).
4.0 DEFINITIONS Page 4 of 107 Page4 of107LAR 2015-01 Rev. I
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 4.1 Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (APLHGR) - the APLHGR shall be applicable to a specific planar height and is equal to the sum of the linear heat generation rates for all the fuel rods in the specified bundle at the specified height divided by the number of fuel rods in the fuel bundle.
4.2 Average Planar Exposure - the Average Planar Exposure shall be applicable to a specific planar height and is equal to the sum of the exposure of all the fuel rods in the specified bundle at the specified height divided by the number of fuel rods in the fuel bundle.
4.3 Critical Power Ratio (CPR) - the ratio of that power in the assembly, which is calculated by application of the fuel vendor's appropriate boiling correlation, to cause some point in the assembly to experience boiling transition, divided by the actual assembly operating power.
4.4 Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) - The River Bend Station specific document that provides core operating limits for the current reload cycle in accordance w~ith Technical Specification 5.6.5.
4.5 Linear Heat Generation Rate (LHGR) - the LHGR shall be the heat generation per unit length of fuel rod. It is the integral of the heat flux over the heat transfer area associated with the unit length. -.
4.6 Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPR) - the MCPR shall be the smallest CPR which exists in the co re.
4.7 MCPR Safety Limit - the minimum value of the CPR at which the fuel could be operated with the expected number"of rods' in boiling transition not exceeding 0.1% of the fuel rods in the core.
4.8 Aligned* Drive Flow - Adjusted FCTR card input drive flow signal that accounts for actual variations in the core flow to drive flow relationship.
4.9 Monitored Region - The area of the core power and flow operating domain where the reactor may be susceptible to reactor instabilities under conditions exceeding the licensing basis of the current reactor system.
4.10 Restricted Region - The area of the core power and flow operating domain where the reactor is susceptible to reactor instabilities in the absence of restrictions on core void distributions.
4.11 Setpoint "Setup" - A FCTR card feature that sets the normal "non-setup" EIA APRM flow-biased scram and control rod block trip reference setpoints associated with the Exclusion and Restricted Regions higher to permit required reactor maneuvering in the Restricted Region when stability controls are in effect.
4.12 EOR -the cycle exposure corresponding to all rods out, 100% power/100% flow, and normal feedwater temperature.
4.13 MOC - Middle of Cycle (EOR-2,794 MWd/MTU) [Reference 3.1.1, page 19].
4.14 EOC - End of Cycle (Core Exposure 35,094 MWd/MTU) [Reference 3.1.1. page 6].
4.15 FFWTR - Final Feedwater Temperature Reduction.
4.16 FHOOS - Feedwater Heater Out of Service.
4.17 PROOS - Pressure Regulator Out of Service.
4.18 SLO - Single Loop Operation.
Page 5 of 107 Page5 of107LAR 2015-01 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating *Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision I
.... 4.19 TBOOS -Turbine Bypass Out of Service 4.20 AREVA - AREVA NP Inc.
4.21 GNF - Global Nuclear Fuel 4.22 EOC-RPT - End of Cycle Recirculation Pump Trip 4.23 Reference Core Loading Pattern - The Core Loading Pattern Used for Reload Licensing Analysis.
4.24 Application. Condition - The combination of equipment out of service conditions for which LHGRFAC and MCPR limits are determined [Reference 3.1.1, page 38]. The Application Conditions are as follows:
All application conditions address the licensed core flow.
Page 6 of 107 Page6 of107LAR 2015-01 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 5.0 CORE DESIGN 5.1 Reference Core Loading Pattern The original Reference Core Loading pattern is presented in Reference 3.1.1.
During the core shuffle a fuel failure was identified. This bundle was scheduled to be shuffled, but because of the failure was discharged and replaced with a similar bundle that was scheduled for discharge. The revised core loading was evaluated in Reference 3.1.5 with the determination that the reload evaluation results were applicable to the revised core.
5.2 Control Rods The River Bend core utilizes the GE design control rods, non GE design CR-82M and CR-82M-1 bottom entry cruciform control rods. These control rod designs are discussed in more detail in Reference 3.1.4, Sections 4.1 and 4.2.
6.0 AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (APLHGR)
Per Technical Specification 3.2.1, all APLHGR values shall not exceed the exposure-dependent limits reported as follows:
Fuel Type Figure GNF2 6.1-la GNF3 6.1-lb For limitssingle for allloop fuel operation types. (SLO) a multiplier of 0.83 [Reference
Per Technical Specification 3.2.2, the MCPR values shall be equal to or greater than the operating limit.
The operating limit is the maximum of the flow-dependent minimum critical power ratio (MCPRF) and the power-dependent minimum critical power ratio (MCPRp).
MCPRF and MCPRp limits are provided in Sections 7.1 and 7.2 below. These limits address the different fuel types, exposure ranges and application conditions.
For single recirculation loop operation (SLO), the MCPR limit is increased by 0.02 [Reference 3.1.1, page 341 to address the difference in the safety limit MCPR reported in Technical Specification 2.1.1.2.
7.1 Flow-Dependent Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPRF) Values:
The MCPRF curves are from Reference 3.1.1, Appendix D as augmented by Reference 3.1.1, Appendix F and are found in the following figures:
Application Figures Condition GNF2 GNF3 1 7.1-la 7.1-lb Page 7 of 107 Page7 of107LAR 2015-01 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 ApplicationFiue Condition GNF2 GNF3 2 7.1-2a 7.1-3b 3 7.1-3a 7.1-3b 4 - I .-A-4a---.
" -4 ' 14i----- :-- . . .. ... .". .. ...
______5 6
___]
J 7.1-5a 7.1-6a I
j 7.1-5b-7.1-6b 7 J 7.1-7a j 7.1-7b 7.2 Power-Dependent Minimum Critical *Power Ratio (MCPRp) Values:
The MCPRP curves are from Reference 3.1.1, Appendix 0 as augmented by Reference 3.1.1, Appendix F and are found in the following figures:
Figure Application BOC - MOC MOC - EOC Condition GNF2 GNF3 GNF2 GNF3 1 7.2-la 7.2-lb 7.2-1c 7.2-1d 2 7.2-2a 7.2-2b 7.2-2c 7.2-2d 3 7.2-3a 7.2-3b 7.2-3c 7.2-3d 4 7.2-4a 7.2-4b 7.2-4c 7.2-4d 5 7.2-5a 7.2-5b 7.2-5c 7.2-5d 6 7.2-6a 7.2-6b' 7.2-6c 7.2-6d 7 7.2-7a 7.2-7b 7.2-7c 7.2-7d More limiting values of the power dependent limits may be used in lieu of those indicated by a particular operating mode. For example EOC values may be used instead of the MOC values.
8.0 LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (LHGR)
Per Technical Specification 3.2.3, the,LHGR values for any rod at any axial location shall not exceed the exposure-dependent limits multiplied by the *smaller of either the power-dePendent or flow-dependent LHGR factors.
For single loop operation (SLO) a multiplier of 0.83 [Reference 3.1.1, page 55] is applied to the LHGR limits for all fuel types.
For two recirculation loop and single recirculation loop operation the LHGR multiplier is as follows:
For two recirculation loop operation:
LHGRFAC = MlN(LHGRFACp, LHGRFACF)
For single loop operation:
LHGRFAC = MIN(LHGRFACp, LHGRFACF, 0.83) 8.1 Exposure-Dependent Linear Heat Generation Rate (LHGR) Values:
Page 8 of 107 Page8 of107LAR 2015-01 Rev. 1
River Bend1 Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision GNF2 and GNF3 exposure-dependent LHGR values are considered GNF proprietary and will not be contained in the COLR. The GNF2 LHGR values may be found in Reference 3.1.2, page 3. Per Reference 3.1.1, Appendix F the GNF2 exposure dependent LHGR values may be applied to' the GNF3 fuel.
8.2 Flow-Dependent Linear Heat Generation Rate Factors (LHGRFACF) Values:
The LHGRFACF curves are from Reference 3.1.1, Appendix 0 as augmented by Reference 3.1.1, Appendix F and are found in the following figures:
Application Figures condition GNF2 GNF3 1 8.2-la 8.2-lb 2 8.2-2a 8.2-2b 3 8.2-3a 8.2-3b 4 8.2-4a 8.2-4b 5 8.2-5a 8.2-5b 6 8.2-6a 8.2-6b 7 8.2-7a 8.2-7b 8.3 Power-Dependent Linear Heat Generation Rate Factors (LHGRFACp) Values:
The LHGRFACp curves are from Reference 3.1.1, Appendix* D as augmented by Reference 3.1.1, Appendix F and are found in the following figures:
Figure Application BOC - MOC ,MOC - EOC Conditions GNF2 GNF3 ' GNF2* GNF3
.1 8.3-la 8.3-lb 8.3-1c 8.3-1d, 2 8.3-2a 8.3-2b 8.3-2c 8.3-2d.
3 8.3-3a 8.3-3b 8.3-3c 8.3-3d 4 8.3-4a 8.3-4b 8.3-4c 8.3-4d 5 8.3-5a 8.3-4b 8.3-5c 8.3-5d 6 8.3-6a 8.3-4b 8.3-6c 8.3-6d
'7 "8.3-7a 8.3-4b 8.3-7c 8.3-7d More limiting particular valuesmode.
operating of theForpower dependent example EOC valuesmultipliers may bemayusedbeinstead used in lieu MOO of those indicated by a of the values.
9.0 STABILITY The following Technical Specifications / Technical Requirements contain stability related requirements:
- TS 3.2.4, Fraction of Core Boiling Boundary (FCBB)
- TS 3.3.1.1, RPS Instrumentation (RPS)
- TS 3.3.1.3, Periodic Based Detection System (PBDS)
Page 9 of 107 Page9 of107LAR 2015-01 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1
. ..... =- -rTR 3.3.2.1, Control Rod Blockl~lstru~rn-entatio nl -.. . . ..- * ....... . .. .... ..... . .
9.1 Stability Region Boundaries and Setpoints region boundaries and setpoints are as follows Description Figure Monitored Region Boundary (Case 1) 9.1-1 Monitored Region Boundary (Case 2) 9.1-2 APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted 9.1-3 Region Boundary (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1)_______
APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted 9.1-4 Region Boundary (Two Recirculatlon Loop Operation -- Case 2)
APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted 9.1-5 Region Boundary (Single Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1)
APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted 9.1-6 Region_ Boundary (Single Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2)
APRM Flow Biased-Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Two Recirculation Loop 9.1-7 Operation - Case 1)
APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Two Recirculation Loop 9.1-8 Operation - Case 2)
APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints .(Single Recirculation 9.1-9 Loop Operation - Case 1) ...
APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod"Block. Setpoints (Single Recirculation 9.1-10 Loop Operation - Case 2)
Note: For Figures 9.1-3 to 9.1-10, the NominaI.Setpoints should be used for indicating the entry into a particular stability region as allowed and appropriate actions be taken prior to the entry In the table above, two distinct operating states (Case I and Case 2) are considered. These are described as follows:
Case I - Normal Feedwater Heatinq Operation or Low Reactor Power :
TFW (at rated)>Ž TI~siG (at rated)-5Q0 F, and rated equivalent at off-rated reactor conditions OR P*<30%
Case 2 - Reduced Feedwater Heating Operation:
TFW (at rated) < T~v 5s1G (at rated) - 50° F AND P>30% *I Page 10 of 107 Page 0of107LAR 2015-0,1 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 The APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High scram setpoint and Restricted Region Boundary, and APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints are given in terms of aligned drive flow. The aligned drive flow is calculated from the input drive flow using the following relationship:
WD 101.209 x A40 - 31.028 x A1°° + 70.181 x W 70.181 - (AO _ 0 Where: W5 = FCTR card input drive flow in percent rated, WD = Aligned drive flow in percent rated, A40 = Low flow drive flow alignment setting, and A1° = High flow drive flow alignment setting.
9.2 APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power-High Time Constant (SR 3.3.1.1.14)
The simulated thermal power time constant is 6 + 0.6 seconds (Reference 3.1.3). Thus the maximum simulated thermal power time constant for use in meeting the surveillance requirement is 6.6 seconds.
Page 11 of 107 Page11 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 6.1-la. MAXIMUM AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (MAPLHGR) VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE FUEL TYPE: GNF2 15 14 13 12 11 10 9
8 C, 7
- 0. 6 5
4 3
2 I
0 0 20 40 60 80 Average Planar Exposure (GWD/MTU)
Average Planar, MAPLHGR Limit Exposure (kW/ft) 0.00 13.78 19.31 13.78 67.00 7.50 70.00 6.69 Page 12 of 107 Page12 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision I FIGURE 6.1-lb. MAXIMUM AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (MAPLHGR) VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE FUEL TYPE: GNF3 15 14 13
,12 11 10
-C-
.J*
4 3
2 1
0 0 20 40 60 80 Average Planar Exposure (GWDIMTU)
Average Planar MAPLHGR Limit Exposure (kW/ft) 0.00 13.78 19.31 13.78 67.00 7.50 70.00 6.69 Page 13 of 107 Page13 o2O15-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.1-la. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE FLOW (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION:, 1 FUEL TYPE: -G NF2 1.5
-!.-- I !
1.4 1.3 0m 0t 1.2 I -
a a ... .a.. . ..]. . ....a.......
.. . ]... .. a - p...
........ a.. ....... . .. .... .. a..
... . .. .'a.... .. ... .. .... .. ..
1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 . 40 50 60 70 80 -90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow I Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.26 1.34 30.0 1.26 1.34
'50.0 1.20 1.27 72.0 1.20 1.20 100.0 1.20 1.20 109.5 1.20 1.20 Page 14 of 107 107LARRev. 1 Page14 o2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.1-lb. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION:1 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.5 SI* K 1.4 1.3 I I j I
... . .. I. . . . . . .. ., . . . .. I. . . ... . . . . . . .. . . . . . . , . . . . . .. -. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .-. . . . .
D.. ... .. . .. ,.. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i . . .. . . . .I . . . . . . ..- . . . .. . . .T. -. . . . ... L -i. . . . . . .J.. . . .. . .. .. .. . . .
..I. .......EoopAuto- --* .... ..... .....*-.....-..........
1.2 i *i * , i ! .- !
........ F........ - . 9....
. - - ! - . .. . . " ... ,y.. ..
1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)
Flow I Loop
(%Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.26 1.34 30.0 1.26 1.34 50.0 1.20 1.27 72.0 1.20 1.20 100.0 1.20 1.20 109.5 1.20 1.20 Page 15 of 107 Page15 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.1-2a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.5 - -I - * - -
. J.--.-..-... I 1.4 1.3
......... -...-...... - ...... .. ........ "....... ....... ~............
"......-........ * .. 1--1 C.,
1.2
" i.........
.....-.... ... q........... . .. .... .. ....... ....... . .p... .. . .. ...4
..... ..... ... .. q..... .. .. .. .*. .. .... . .
. ...... .. .i....... .. .. ..i...
0--oo 0 20ua 30- 40 50........ 60...0 0-- 90..... ..100... 110.....
1.1 1.0 Flow (%Rated)
Flow I . Loop
(%Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.26 1.34 30.0 1.26 1.34
,50.0 1.20 1.27 72.0 1.20 1.20 100.0 1.20 1.20 109.5 1.20 1.20 Page 16 of 107 Page16 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.1-2b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.5
- U, I - I - U I .1 1. .'
1.4
. I K - ItI 1.3 iI I I I C.,
1.2 I i I I
---'o~opi~aua - --- r,---- ---- .. . . * - I ... . .. - .. ...- ..... -......
. .- T -.. ... .... , ,., " .
1.1 -..... -..... ..- .. -. .... *- ..... 4 -.... L........ -.... .-. . -....
1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)
Flow I Loop
(%Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.26 1.34 30.0 1.26 1.34 50.0 1.20 1.27 72.0 1.20 1.20 100.0 1.20 1.20 109.5 1.20 1.20 Page 17 of 107 Page17 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.1-3a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.5 1.4 ..o... p ...... u.........
-...... ......... i ......... i..........i. . ...... .. . ........V.... .....i...............
1.3 -. II a-C.,
1.2
-........... *............... FF.........................
- ............................... ............................. "T...............
i i , i
... . ... i " i. t . . ..
1.1
II------I--- I 1.0 i
- !- - P- - ! -~ - - -
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow I Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.26 1.34 30.0 1.26 1.34 50.0 1.20 1.27 72.0 1.20 1.20
,100.0 1.20 1.20 109.5 1.20 1.20 Page 18 of 107 Page18 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.1-3b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.5 I I 1
- i r - - - - 1- - - 4 --------
, +------- 4 ,------
1.4
- I ]. ---. - '
. . . .-1.
1.3 1.2 ..-o.....
p- ut --, * ...-*i ..---* ---..,.. ..... ... . ......- ...... . r... . .. . . ..,-..
..... I... -. . . .
......... p....a . .. .. . . ... t....
- *1,_
- 4. . .. .. !. .... . . -.. .- ... - . f.. ..-......
. . i. . .. ... . .... .
1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow l Loop
(%Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.26 1.34 30.0 1.26 1.34 50.0 1.20 1.27 72.0 1.20 1.20 100.0 1.20 1.20 109.5 1.20 1.20 Page 19 of 107 107LARRev. 1 Page19 o2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.1-4a. OPERATING LiMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.5
. . . . . :. . .L..-:* ... [
1.4
-I---oop~Manu a I--, ...- ,
1.3 I .. ..... ... . . . . .
0t 1.2 SI I I I .
_. . . . ... . .. . . .... . . . . . . . . . .. - ~
.. ... ii. . . I.-. . . . .
1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow I Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 1.33* 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page20 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1 Page 20 of 107
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.1-4b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.5 LOOp Auto . .
1.4
...--Loop-Manual-. *i ' * *.. - '. .. ...... ......
1.3
................ ............... --...............- ..v . .... .
n-i i i4 1.2
. . .. . . ..*-...... ~~ j iI..
.. *...... .. . . .*. ... ........... _ _¢ ...... ....- --......---. -..... *---*---.......
1.1 , ) ,/1 ,
- I , I
.... ... ... .... .. ... ... ..- .... -.. .. . *...... . . ... .... . ... .. .... .. .. . . .. . . . .. . . ...-..... ...t .. . .. .. ..-. . .... . . ..i. ... . . .
1.0 0 10 20 30 40 *50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow I Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 .1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42
-72.0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 .1.27 Page 21 of 107 Page21 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.1-5a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: '5 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.5 Loop Auto i '*
- i i i i 1.4
--- oop Manuat , :.. .....
- -...... ....... i... ...
. . ... . . . .i . . . .........
.... ........... . " i-.. .... ..... .. ...... ..-.....,t........- ....
1.3 0t f.............*.............t----: ........*........----------------------.---.......---...........---............---...........
1C. ------------------------------...--- I---- j.
4..t.....
--....... . ... . ... ... . . . . . ... . . .. . . .. ]. . . . .. .. . . . .. . . . . . .. .. .. ...- . .... .. .
1.2 1.1 1 4--- -'
S 1 20 30 40 5 ............ 60...... 80...........90...............
70................... ..00........... 110..............
1.0 Flow (%Rated)
Flow I Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 i.33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page 22 of 107 Page22 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report Revision 1I
- Cycle 19 FIGURE 7.1-5b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: -5 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.5 U - .Ii - I - .
LoOP Auto, *i I 1.4
..- ....oo .pManual . ........ r-* - ...... . . .. .. . .*......* - - . . ..... ..* ..... !. . ...... t.. . .. .
-.-------.---.- . + --- I 1.3
- 1 £ A---- - i }-
LL 0.
C.,
1.2 1.1
. .. ..- - . ... . . ..- "... -... ..- ..- * . ... . .. . . . ....... i...-....
i ...... ....-- ..... . - ... ... .. . ... ... .... 1'* .. -
..... t. .. ... ..-
1.0 - - q- ~ -~ - - P- - - q- p-0 10 20 30 40 .'50 60 70 . 80 90 100 110 Flow, (%Rated)
Flow ] Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 1.09.5 1..27 1.27 Page 23 of 107 Page23 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1' FIGURE 7,t=6a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.5 Loop. Auto -,- .. !
1.4
...... Loop M anual- . ... . ..... .. - --.....
- r.. . ...
1.3 0m 0t 1.2 I .L.I......
1A1
- -................ q - . p - - q [
1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow l Loop
(% Rated) Manual Laoo Auto1 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27
- Page 24 of 107 PageAR201.5-01 4of107 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.1-6b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.5 Loop Auto L*: -----. ------- i
.... ....*.* .. ... ....- *. ! =, .... ... .... .. *...-...
1.4 Loop..... -M a... u... .-.. . ..... ....-.....--.... .... ,.........-........ -.. -........
- -...... L ........
I_*tt 1V C I ------ ; r
- '-- 1- - -- -----
1.3 IJ.
0* SI I I U3 1.2
. .1 I - . - . .....
..... F i ...........
..... .i...........
1.1
... L .. .. . . . L . . ... . . . . .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . .L .. . . .. . .. I . . .. ... .. .. {... .. .. . . ..
1 .0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow I Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42
.72.0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page 25 of 107 Page25 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGUR .E 7.1-7a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.5 Loop_ Auto : ,
1.4
oopManual*
1.3 U.
, I . i*-
- 10. ..*... ... . ... . .. ".. . . .. .-r. . ..... ..-. . . . . ..-.. . . . . . .. . . .
. . .. . .. . - . .. . .. . . ,. .. . .... I . .. . .. . .
0 1.2 I I}i I
1 .'1 ......... ....
.... .... . .. ....... * . .... "-* . . . . ... i . . .. . .. . .. .... . ... ... . . " ... ...... . .. .. . .,... .... ...
............. i.. 1 ... ... .... . .. .. ................ !......................
I - -I I - - I Sl I -,
1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 '90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)
Flow! Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page 26of 107 Page26of107LAR 2015-01 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.1-7b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.5 . - .- .- .- .- .- . -
.... ..... .................I.. . .* . .... ......... .... . .. . . ... . .
. ........ .....i. ... !.... ...... .. ......i! ...--. - .. *
.... . . . . .i . . . .. . .* . . . . . . ..i... . ... . . ... . . . . . ... .. .. . ... . ..
1.4
....---L Manual--' ,ioop. ........-
1.....
....... t *. . . --..... .....-.... .
1.3 LI. *.......*..... ......... .-- ......-- -. 4.... - ----- .1........ --- ....... ..-- .....--- _-,-.........--.-- ...................
,i- *........
- 0. -i---I ------ I-i i-1.2 ..... ... .-*. t. .. . - . . . . .. .. .,4.. . . .- .. ........ .. .... . - ........1 .. . .. . . . .i. . . .
i,!IiI I I .. ,...I., i~- i....
.. . . . . .i. . . . . . .. . . . . . .... -- . . ....-.....
. !... . I, .
... . ... ..L ... - .. .. . .. . .- . . . . .
1.1 4 II
' I II
.. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . .- . . . . . . .. . . . .+ . . . . ..... q .. ; .. . . . , . .-... . . . * .-... . . . " .. . . . .. .*. . .. . . . . *.. . . . . .
1 .0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 10 110 Flaw (%Rated)
Flow I Loop
(%Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 1,33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page 27 of 107 Page27 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision I FIGURE 7.2-la, OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPR~)
APPLICATION CONDITION: I EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC 3.0 2.8 ........I ... .
....-...... ....- - i.... ........ ............j.. ............... *......... . i. .. .. .. .. . .. ..i. .....
j...... .. ........
........ -...... ...... ].....= .*....... .. J....... L......... *............ L........~......
... ..... ]....... ~
2.6
- ... I..
2.4 2.2 n.2.0 I . ". 1 1.8 II I *'!II1
... .. ... . ... .. ...... t .. .... . .. .. .. . . ... . . .. .... . . . ..
1.6 ...... ...... !...........
r ............,..... ... ... ? ..... ........ -..............i .. . .....
S --.. 1 -- l--1.......
. -.. . . .. . .,-.. . .. . . . . ... . . ..... i. . . .. . .
1.4 - p q 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power S 50.0%
(%Rated). Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40.0 1.59 50.0 _____ 1.59 70.0 1.59 85.0 1.44 85.0 _____ 1.44 90.0 1.39 100.0 _____ 1.35 Page 28 of 107 Page28 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. .1
River Bend ,Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-lb. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION:
EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: SGNF3 2.8 .. ..... .
2.6 ............. :
2.4 2.2 '<
C.
2.0 1.8 .. . ... .
1.6 .........
1.4 1.2 ....... .
1.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power <*50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40.0 1.64 50.0 1.64 70.0 1.64 85.0 1.49 85.0 1.49 90.0 1.44 100.0 _____ 1.40 Page 29 of 107 Page29 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-Ic. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPR~)
APPLICATION CONDITION: I EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TC2I EOC P
3.0 t.II
- I I I I 2.8 I I II 2.6 III 2.4
. I ....
_....-i,! !
2.2 ~ , f T /
', i I Ii
' 2.0 1.8 jI I ,, ...
1.6 i ":.. . .. . . . .. .. *. .. .. ... i .. .. . i . ..- . .......... ..... . f. .. .. .. .
1.4 4 Ji'E 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 1.63 50.0- ____ 1.63 70.0 1.59 85.0 _____ 1.48 85.0 _____ 1.48 90.0 1.44 100.0 _____ 1.41 Page 30 of 107 Page30 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report -Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-Id. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: I EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8
............... r, [ - .. . . . . . . . .... ." . . . . . . . . -..- .. ........ ...... ......-... . .- . .-- .. . .. . .
2.6
.... ... . .. . . . . ..Z SI 1 I. . . . . ...,.. .. ..... . .*.. .. . ... . . . . . . . -,. . . . . ... . . ..-. .. . . . .. . . . . ... . ... ,.. . . .. . . .
2.4 2.2 I. I I 0.
n.2.0 ........
. . . . . . .. . . . . . .1 - * -- 1. . . . . . . 1. U. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .-. . . . . . . . ... . . . . . .. ,. . . . . . .
'I. - - I '*---*-
1.8 1.6
- . - 1iiiii -
-* ........~~---- -------------------------------------... . . .+...... ..... .. P . ....
- - q - - ! - p 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23:8 2.23 2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40.0 1.68 50.0 1.68 70.0 1.64 85.0 ___ __ 1.53 85.0 ___ __ 1.53 90.0 ___ __ 1.49 100.0 ___ __ 1.46 Page 31 of 107 Page31 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-2a.
OPRTN II MP ESSCR POE -_.R~
APPlICATION CONDITION:-2 I MOC 3.0 - .- p I p p I I I P p r................ * ..............
2.8
.. .....i ........ ..
.................. i...................
2.6 ............................i ...........................
- 5Q.0..EIco i 2.4 2.2 "N ..-. ~-.........-...~.--.
! ' i 0.
- , U.U/orIIO}W eu2.0
... i.... .......
1.8
...... i. ..... . ..... .......
1.6 I - I 1.4
{*.....j..........
..... "+,---- ' 4 ... . ~.... *.......*... ..........*.... .. ÷ . ... .......
1.2 ..... ... S--,.......,... . ...... .... ........... *.......... j....,.... ...........
- p q 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70. 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40.0 1.59 50.0 1.59 70.0 _____ 1.59 85.0 1.46.
85.0. _____ 1.46 90.0 1.42 100.0 _____ 1.39 Page 32 of 107 Page32 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. '1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report 'Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-2b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8 SI I 2.6
.... ..... *........L....
2.4
.~~.... . ......-4..--.I--.-...... ........ ..... ÷ ....... !. ..... L... ..
2.2
- - .. i -i a.2.0 1.8 .. .. .. ........ !. ... . .. . . ... .. -.. jI - .i . -
I I 1.6 1.4 I - I 4 F
- - - p - - p !
1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
- 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 -1.98 2.15 40.0 1.64 50.0 . .1.64 70.0 1.64 85.0 1.51 85.0 1.51 90.0 1.47 100.0 _____ 1.44 Page 33 of 107 Page33 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River 'Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-2c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: .2 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TCI EOC S FUEL--'TYPE: '< GNI 3.0 I r i -. - -i 2.8 .].... .. . .T .....-.-.-.-......- ....... ..........--- --................ .
SI , I I 2.6 I I 2.4
- ,50% FoW I ]i T'*
.... . ... .... ... i " ' .. . . .. . . . . I . .. . .. . . .. . . .. .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . . I. .-.. . . . . ... . ...... . . .. ..--. ...... . .....
2.2 .. ...... ... ....*....i.........
. .. . . .. ... .. . ...... .". .. . . . .. .. *. . . . . . . . ..... .. ..... .... . ...... .. ..... .. .. .. . .i.-........ .....
... .. ..... .. . .!.. .. .. ... ?. -* . .. .i * . . . .. . : . . . .. . .t.. . . .. . . * . . .. . .- ?I. . . -.. . . . . . .. . . ..-.. .. . . .
0~ 2.0 1.8
...................... i-i 1.6-t i 1.4- .............. ,...,....,?.
........... * ............. , ........... + ......... * ............. *........... * ...................... "!-
1.2
............... * ................................ F ........... "P.............
m m I I9 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 1.63
- 50.0 1.63 70.0 _____ 1.59 85.0 .1.51 85.0 1.51 90.0 1.48 100.0 ___ _ 1.44 Page 34 of 107 Page34 o2015-01107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-2d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 ........ *...... -, ..-.... ....... - -....... - ...
2.8
>50 F=v -I L. . .t- --
2.6 t -- *1---------
. '..~ F ' ' --- Z 2.4
- >50 F o~w * %, . J----- -- - . .... .. .......--..........-..-...........
2.2 .. . . . . ..-. . . . . . I... . . ... I.
- L. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . .. . . . .. . .. .
0.
a.2.0 1.8 , , s1- f
.i. . .. . . . . .!. . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .i . .. . . . . . . . . . .. .*. . .. . . . . . . . . . ..1. . . . .. . . .. . . . . .
.. .. .. .i.. . . . .. . . . .. . ..- . . .. ----. .. . .--..
.. .. .. . -i.
. . .. .q.. . . .. ..- . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . ..- .. . . .. . .
1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40.0 1.68 50.0 1.68 70.0 1.64 85.0 _____ 1.56 85.0 1.56 90.0 1.53 100.0 _____ 1.49 Page 35 of 107 Page35 o201 107LAR5-01 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-3a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp) 3 APPLICATION CONDITION:
i-u ~L-I-T r~:
3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2
- .2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power *
- 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40.0 _____ 2.09 50.0 1.95 70.0 _____ 1.75 85.0O ____ 1.64 85.0 _____ 1.42 90.0 _____ 1.39 100.0 _____ 1.35 Page 36 of 107 Page36 o201 5-01 Rev. 1 107LAR
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7,2-3b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 -
2.8 2.6 .....-........* 0 2.4 .. .......-
2.2 ....
- 1.8 - _ _
1.6 ,".... . ... . "... .
1.4 !
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40.0 _____ 2.14 50.0 ____ 2.00 700 ____ 1.80 85.0 _____ 1.69 85.0 _____ 1.47 90.0 _____ 1.44 100.0 _____ 1.40 Page 37of107 Page37 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision I FIGURE 7.2-3c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC
.. .... ;.... ... FU EL _I-ypE: . . . . .. . .. O;NF2. . . . ... .
3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 a 2.2 a.
01.
2.0 U..
1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10, 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 10 Power (% Rated)
Power _<50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 2.09 50.0 _____ 1.99 70.0 _____ 1.80 85.0 1.70 85.0 ___ __ 1.47 90.0 ___ __ 1.44 100.0 ___ __ 1.41 Page 38 of 107 Page38 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-3d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8 2.6 1 ...*...... 0 F~* . .-......... -....Sr---i ...................
-i . .... . ..
I
. . . . . .... ....t..... . .......i. ..... ... .
2.4
...... . . O.. ..%.. . .F. .o.
. . . .. . . . . . . . i. . . . . . ..
I*
. . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . .. . .i. . . . . . ... . . . . . . .
I---
2.2 a.2.0 II
..... ...- . .. .. "-........... T. ..
--...... I-...".
1.8
.... ... ..... .. ... .T,.. .. .. .. . ..-. .. '. .. .. ..
1.6
.... . .. .. ... . . ..,. ..* . . . . . . .i.. . .. . . .* . -.... .. . . .'. . . . . . - i. . ... .. . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . ..
1.4 , p - , -
1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40.0 2.14 50.0 2.04 70:0 1.85 85.0 1.75 85.0 1.52 90.0 1.49 100.0 _____ 1.46 Page 39 of 107 Page39 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-4a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPR~)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOCTC )MOC
_ i l r-=--_
ir'*- L* l 3.0 - .- .- .- , - .- .- .- .- .- I -
2.8 2.6 .. ......',I . ...o ...... . . .... . . . .. . . ... ... .. .. . . . .' .. . ... . . - --- ,---
[
2.4 2.2 .. .. ... .. .. .. .. . . . .. . . . .-.. . .. . .- . .. . . . . .- .. .- . . ,'+
.. .. .. . "--' -j. --. . --. .: --.
. . . . . . . .i-. . . .. . . . . .. . ..
. *....... ....-...... - ... I..- .-- ... ~ ....- ---....... ' ..........
I,1*
k........
I -
- a. 2.0 ....I .... .. -...
. ........ . +......... ....
- .. ... .......... . -. . . . . . ... I .... -....
.. . . . . +.. ........ ... .. i.... ... . . . . I. . ..... . ... ..-- . . .. ....- . .. .. ...
1.8
.. U 1.6 S-1.4
.. .. .... . . . ... . . .. . . . -. . . . . . . . . . . -- !p p -__+p. - ,
1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40.0 1.64 50.0 1.59 70.0 1.59 85.0 ___ __ 1.46 85.0 1.46 90.0 ___ __ 1.41 100.0 _____ 1.37 Page 40 of 107 Page40 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-4b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: 'BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8
>biY HOW ... !
2.6 2.4 7I507iIIF .o.---... . -
2.2 a.2.0
<R '*^* ,=. !o .. ..-.-... .......
- "% ...E~- .. . .... .. .... .. ... .t --.-.... I........i .... .
1.8
-- ------,--, I- !
1.6
- - ..... p - y --
1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40.0 1.69 50.0 1.64 70.0 1.64 85.0 -1.51 85.0 1.51 90.0 ___ _ 1.46 100.0 ___ _ 1.42 Page 41 of 107 Page41 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report-7 Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-4c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPR~)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC 3.0 2.8 I I 2.6 SI t I II1I II I 2.4
...... I 2.2 o,2.0 1.8 i . -, i ..
t..............i 1.6
...... ,....--- . .1 .
1.4 t !m ........ ,rn m m m m m' = pi 1.2 1.0
.0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power -<50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 1.66 50.0 1.65 70.0 _____ 1.61 85.0 1.51 85.0 1.51 90.0 1.47 100.0 _____ 1.43 Page 42 of 107 Page42 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-4d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 I - m- I ! I 2.8 .. .... +/---...
. ... ---.. ... ... ... .. ...4 . ... .. ... ...- + .. ... ... ..-. ... ...... ..
...... %FIoi *. i........-'...........J...................
2.6 i'* i i........................
2.4 x -------------. -.----.- ,... 4--.----
2.2 x
..,+ . ...- -4'... . .. .... . . . ..-
a-i
,,2.0 S---I----- 4 .------------
i S............ .. 4 .....
.......... .... .i...........
1.8 S1----I 1.6 .....................
1.4 1.2 .... ...
' -I
.4-F- ... ... ...
1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
- 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40.0 1.71 50.0 1.70 70:0 _____ 1.66 85.0 ___ __ 1.56 85.0 _____ 1.56 90.0 _____ 1.52 100.0 ____ 1.48 Page 43 of 107 Page43 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-5a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TC) MOC
- I-'lJt I'-L--- Iy IJ I- _. I ME--
I Vm* I nB mJ 3.0 2.8 i -- ...... . .- ~.- . . ---
......... - .. J~oi......... ... ......t.... .. . "....
-.. . +........ . .
2.6 2.4 2.2 0.
m 2.0 1.8 I-!i -
-I
- -11 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40.0 1.64 50'*0 1.59 70.0 _____ 1.59 85.0 _____ 1.49 85.0 _____ 1.49 90.0 _____ 1.45 100.0 ____ 1.41 Page 44 of 107 Page44 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-5b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8 .-. I I i *I -
2.6 i I "li! I i.
.,.- - ..... T......... :..... .... 1........... i.--...
2.4
! ; ---x ------
2.2 0.
a.2.0 I ' *iI p - I 1.8 ........
7..%-tiv_* .---
'=
- I
'qli. I i -
--1-i [- -
1.6 .. .. .. .. ..!.. .. .. ..--. .. ..-- ..- - . -i---
,-- .. . .... .. . . . . .. .... . .. .. ... ... i-.. .. . .... T .... .. . .. i.. . .. .. . ..--I . . .. ..-
, ! q .--
i .*,--I.I...
- .. .. .......- . ....... . p......... q -....... ....... ........ t .....
1.4 1.2 1.0o 0 10 20 30 40 50 .60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power S 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow ,>50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40.0 1.69 50.0 .1.64 70.0. 1.64 85.0 1.54 85.0 1.54 90.0 1.50
'100.0 . 1.46
- Page 45 of 107 LAR 2015-01 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-5c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPR~)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO I EOC
~I I~! *rlJ~~. - V~PJE t~~1If~. . . _________________________________________
3.0 - I - I - I I - - - I I in17in - .
2.8 4- - - +/- -.
2.6
- >50%.'/o FIc 2.4
...... i ....
2.2
- ,OU UVo I-ic3 xN C.,
1.8 ii I
1.6
..............................i...................................................
1.4 ..................... I".................... i.........................
1.2 I
i---- - - - - -- i ! '
I
! ----- :i- - -* - ! ------
1.0 . ] - ] - - L - . - '
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 : 1.66 50.0 _____ 1.65 70.0 1.61 85.0 1.54 85.0 1.54 90.0 1.51 100.0 _____ 1.46 Page 46 of 107 Page46 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-5d: OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 ExPoSURE RANGE: M OC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: .GNF3 3.0 2.8 ........... ....... ....,.....-.- . .t -
2.6
.-... . -... ........... ..................-......-. ... -... . . - .................. !..I................ . ...........
> HOW I ~ I . , . ",
2.4 ........ OQ ..
. k*...--....* ..... ......
.. ....... ~ .,,-.. i i i 2.2
.. I I f--.
- . . i.....
.o.2.0 1.8 1.6 I .-.... ..... . . ... . . . . .*! .
... ... . .. . . . .. .. . . .... ... i... . . . .
1.4
.... ,....j . -
.1.2
- 9 - 4 -!i !i P 4 9 -
1.0 0 10 , 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1'00 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
- 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 ,2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40.0 1.71 50.0 _____ 1.70 70.0 _____ 1.66 85.0 _____ 1.59 85.0 1.59 90.0 _____ 1.56 100.0 _____ 1.51 Page 47 of 107 Page47 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1.
FIGURE 7.2-6a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC I" ~L-Ii rL:
IU ) MOO
-2 3.0 I I - I a a I 2.8 2.6 - I - . j . 4 . . . ' ........ ......
2.4 2.2 ... ..-.... I.. .-..- --.. - .. - i
,,2.0 1.8
--I 1 " . 4 i+ _ i . .
1.6 --*-' * ' '- - d *9 -" ! - , I- ,-
'..1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40.0 2.09 50.0 1.95 70.0 1.75 85.0 1.64 85.0 1.44 90.0 1.41 100.0 _____ 1.37 Page 48 of 107 Page48 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-6b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: .6 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 I m. ml mu 1 2.8 .......... .4................
4-............... -i................ *-...............
-- >50 Fl
.............I ...............
i 2.6 4 I
... ... .. . .. . ..Fl.. . *,. . . . . . . ..} . . . . . .
2.4 - -
2.2 E I 0.
- .2.0 :i: : i: :i: i i i i i ilL L I *
..................... ........................... !I . ... 4..................................
~~~---.......
1.8 . .
- ... . .*--i .......................... i...................... ...
1.6
................... i..........................i..................... i I
- i 1.4 1 -.
J - II- - -.- I - -I 1.2 I
.............. ............... ...- I.-.. ...... . -. . ..... * ... -...... II-- - -
1.0 ' I .. . . ... i " 1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40.0 2.14 50.0 2.00, 70.0 1.80 85.0 1.69 85.0 1.49 90.0 1.46 100.0 _____ 1.42 Page 49.of 107 Page49of107LAR 2015-01 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-6c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TC SEOC
-FUEL-T'YPE: . .. ....- . GN!
3.0 2.8
..... i. . . ... .. .. l.. .. ......... ................ . . .... ..... ........
2.6
- . ?....
5.0%_Eo . " v"... -.... ........................................... ..... i . "L. .
2.4 2.2 0t .............................
0-2.0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~.
.......... "I-r........ *-0O 4.".....7... .. ....
I.I 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 I - i m , - , - p - - 9 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated),
Power <_50.0%
(% Rated) .Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 2.09 50.0 1.99 70.0 1.80 85.0 1.70 85.0 1.51 90.0 1.47 100.0 _____ 1.43 Page 50 of 107 Page50 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-6d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: . 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 I i 2.2
- a. 2.0 i I-Jii 1.8 I i ItI
.. ....... :......... -. . . ..- . . . . ...... .... . ... d... ... . . -....... . -. .. .. 9-, . ... . .i .. .- . .4 . .. -.. .
1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40.0 2.14 50.0 2.04 70.0 _____ 1.85 85.0 _____ 1.75 85.0 ___ __ 1.56 90.0 _____ 1.52 100.0 ___ _ 1.48 Page 51 of 107 Page51 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-7a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO )MOC
-FU EL--'t'PE:: GNf 3.0
- p - t I i !
2.8 2.6 o- . . . . . . . . ...... .*.i..i* . .
II.. " -.- ......... !. . . .
2.4 2.2 i I I 0* i. .. .. .. .. .. .'
- 0. 2.0
..... . 7 . .. . . . . j.......
.....I . ......... ... . T...... ..... .... :..., ... ..
1.8
.. .. .... ... .... .. .... .... ..- -................ . -........... i .. . .... ........ r... . ...
1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 6,0 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
- 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40.0 2.09 50.0 1.95 70.0 1.75 85.0 1.64 85.0 _____ 1.47 90.0 1.45 100.0 _____ 1.41 Page 52 of 107 Page52 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-7b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 i m - p p i p 2.8
.. ,j .. ... ... ..... ... .... . . . ... =.. .. . . . . 1. .... i . , .. . . . ... ... . . . . .
2.6 2.4 2.2 a.2.0 1.8 I ....-. . '..-..---.
1.6 1.4 i - ." , i.-
.............. Y -...-.......-...... - -......... . . .....- . . . -.............
1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
(%Power < 50.0%Fo-Rated) Flow >50% Fo 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40.0 2.14 50.0 2.00 70.0 .1.80 85.0 _____ 1.69 85.0 1.52 90.0 _____ 1.50 100.0 ____ 1.46-Page 53 of 107 Page53 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-7c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TC:)EOC FUEL-1YPE:' GNI F9 3.0 2.8
. ".........o . .. . . . - .. .... - ..........- .. .. ... ..... - .... . ... .. -...... .1. .. .-.. .. . ..
2.6 i I! --- {I---- I i 2.4 2.2 .1 .1 I..
0.
. . . . . . . . . . . ." . . . . . . .1.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .f. . . . . . . . . . . . . .t . . . . . . . . . . . .!. . . . .
- .2.0 1.8 "i--------.-I---I 1 :- -.
. . . . .p.. . .. .
. ... . . . -... m-*. .. ..-... . p . -.. . .. . r .. . .. . . . .... . . q.. . . . . . . . . . . ..i* . . . .
1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 %
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1O00 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 2.09 50.0 _____ 1.99 70.0 1.80 85.0 1.70 85.0 ___ __ 1.54 90.0 ___ __ 1.51 100.0 ___ __ 1.46 Page 54 of 107 Page54 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 7.2-7d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.6 ............ *50 2.2 a.
0*
C., 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 '2.03 2.15 40.0 2.14 50.0 2.04 -
70.0 1.85 85.0 1.75 85.0 _____ 1.59 90.0 _____ 1.56 100.0 _____ 1.51 Page 55 of 107 Page55 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.2-1a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 1.0 0.8
- ='0.6
-I-
.1
.0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 56 of 107 Page56 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.2-lb. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: I FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 10 --
0.8
-* Loop
,oO.6 U-0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50; 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 57 of 107 107LARRev. 1 Page57 o2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.2-2a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 1.0 0.8 0O.6 IL.
0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 58 of 107 Page58 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision I FIGURE 8.2-2b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 -
1.0 ... ...
0.8 ... -....
-- Loop IL . 6 ... ......
..1 0.4 .. . ...
0.20-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 59 of 107 Page59 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.2-3a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 II II Ii I I I 1.0 0.8 I i --A-f"
- i Loop Manual I *iiiiiiii d 0.6 - -. i1 ii L.. . p..
... A,.to,-Loo....
' . .~.
+-.... ...............---- ....
i~l.J ** I"*u.--- -
-J 0.4
, ii ii i . I*.
0.2 II~~E I. - ' t -
0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500
- 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 60 of 107 Page60 o201 107LAR 5-01 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.2-3b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 FUEL TYPE: -GNF3 1.2 1.0 ..... ..i...
0.8
-* Loop iMar
,-J
,I 0.4 .. . .. . . ...
0.2 ......... . ..
0.0 m y
,110 Flow (%Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 61 of 107 Page61 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1I FIGURE 8.2-4a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 SFUEL TYPE: GNF2 1 .2 m..a .. m m ..... m i
!i i * {I.
- i i t i i 1.0 !
- i./ -i r - m
.............. ........ .... i....... . ......
}-
E i I '
0.8 .............. -F.....
P Loop 'Manual a m !
0 U.
0.6 I /iil iii ---------------------------------------------------------
U-
.........L. oop..Auto.-a m i C,
=
-I 0.4 I =
i 0.2
-i....................... [..........................
0.0 !I - , Im - p - q - p i 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 62 of 107 LAR 2015-01 Rev. 1
.2
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.2-4b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flaw (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 0.8
-- Loop Mar
,-j 0.4 .. . .... . .
0.20 ---
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 63 of 107 2015-01 Page63 o 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits* Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1, FIGURE 8.2-5a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 FUEL TYPE:. GNF2 1.2 1.0 0.8 4.) 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flaw (%Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 64 of 107 Page64 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.2-5b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1.0-0.8
-- Loop iMar U--
~~1 ..... .4. .
0.4 00-yi 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 65 of 107 Page65 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.2=6a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFAC*)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 1.0 0.8
~0.6 C,-
0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20:3.0 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% ,l~oop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 66 of 107 Page66 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8,2-6b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: .6 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 - . I I I I I I I
-i ---- a.----
1.0 0.8 Loop iManual
,,30.6 7..
-- L p ut I I 0.4
. ~---- ~-.t---------------------------------
i..----.-.i----.i---I--------------------
- - -- I-.--- --------i.- -------t.- ---
0.2
- -
- i 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 67 of 107 107LARRev. 1 Page67 o2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.2-7a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flaw (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 ,. .-- I ,.
- . pI I i n .
1.0- 1 0.8-Loop Mlvanual m m i. *' ! ! ! , ...............i ..........................
~0.6 i
...... .... i .........
............ I...............
-I 0.4 SI I 1 0.2
-*i--
0.0 I m I I I m I m I m I I I I I 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 90 100 110 80 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% Loop.
Rated) Manual' Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 1"09.5 1.000 1,000 Page 68 of 107 107LARRev. 1 Page68 o2015-01
River RevisionBend1 Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 FIGURE 8.2-7b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: "7 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 m 1.0 ........
0.8 .. ......-
-* Loop 04.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% LooP..
Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 69 of 107 Page69 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-1a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC 1.2
- p pI I i I I I 1.0 I , i I
!t. .............
0.8 i .- ...... - . - . .. i. ..... .... .. +...... .......
.'%FIo~W~ .
a-
~0.6 0.4
- - - -I 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 .30 "40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power < .5cX0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 ___ __ 0.840 50.0 ___ __ 0.89T 70.0 ___ __ 0.995 85.0 ___ __ 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 ___ __ 1.000 Page 70 of 107 Page70 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report Revision 1
- Cycle 19 FIGURE 8.3-lb. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: I EXPOSURE RANGE: ,BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 -
1 .0 ......... .- ...
0.8 S0.6 .......
CJ L
0.4 .... *....
0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 ___ __ 0.897 70.0 ___ __ 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 ___ __ 1.000 100.0 ___ __ 1.000 Page 71 of 107 Page71 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-1c. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFAC~)
APPLICATION CONDITION: I EXPOSURE RANGE: MOCTOEOC 1.2 m1pp i i i "i.............T.............. -i".............
i i i, i; i l !
1.0 i::-* ..................!....................... I I - U
- ! i
, FloW
.......... , .. . .F..
.. . .. . . .. . . T .. .. . .. ..T . .. .. .. . ------------4 0.8 1 i i
, 0.6 i . i I ,
t !
I I 0.
i i i I i i
~0.2
! ... . Ia :i......
0.4 II! 1 .. ..... ...4. ..... -........ 4 ....-...... .
... ... .... . . 4
...... ......... . . .... *.............. . N
-...... ....-.. . ... 4 . .. .... .... ...- ... . . ..... .........
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80.* 90 1O00 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
- 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 ____ 1.000 Page 72 of 107 2015-01 Rev. 1 Page 2 of107LAR
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1I FIGURE 8.3-Id. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 -i -
1.0
!I it{
0.8
- . L I ! - -
0.6 0..
............ i .-.---..
0.4 - 09 F- --. -- 9po 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50,0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 73 of 107 Page73 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8,3-2a, OPERA-'TING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE.POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL-TYPE: .. .. . .. . "rGNF2 . .. . . .
1 .2 - . - u n -
1..---... . . . . . . IIi
........ T..... .. ........ i......... ..... ... T............
uE *............................
u!I.. i*....~...
I... t 08.1 .I . . I . . . . . .,..* . . . . . .
a1.
0.6 UI-
-j 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power _<50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0,687 40.0 _____ 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 _____ 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 74 of 107 Page74 o201 107LAR 5-01 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle. 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-2b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 -
0.8
,< 0.6 .......
U--
0.4 ........
0 .2 ............
0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 75 of 107 Page75 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-2c. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC
..... . ...... * .. .. 'FUEL'--'YPE : .. . .... .. .. . ... * .. . -GNF2 ,
1 .2 - - m
,----- _____ _ I
- 1. -.......... i ....... :i.......... ................ -.. L....t....... *...~. -.-...-.- -.
. , I 1 0.8.. - I" .. 2 .
C.,
0.6 U--
-j 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
- 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 ___ __ 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 ______ 0.999 90.0 ___ __ 1.000 100.0 ___ __ 1.000 Page 76 of 107 Page76 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-2d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6
-J 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 _____ 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 77 of 107 Page77 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-3a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC 1.2 1.0 0.8 CD 0.6
.-j 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 . 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 ____ 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 0.820 85.0 ____ 0.869 90.0 1.000 100.0 ____ 1.000 Page 78 of 107 Page78 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-3b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 0.8 0.6 a=
n1 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 ____ 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 0.820 85.0 0.869 90.0 1.000 100.0 ____ 1.000 Page 79 of 107 Page79 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-3c. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC
. ... ""FUEL-TYP-E: . .... . .. GNF2. . .
1_2 u - p p p I I I I I I IiI !1I i 1 i
- i 1.0 I
i
........................t ............................ *............... .........
---T A"-I-.
0.8 SIi i i
- l i a.9 0.6 U-.
_1 0.4
......................... i ........................
I .........................i..........................
0.2 ....................?...................
........................ J..........................
i
........................... i ....... "r....... i k i
...................... j............................. ......................... i.....................
-I i
0.0 - !- - p- q- P- - - P-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0:739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 ____ 0,688 50.0 ____ 0.738 70.0 ____ 0.818 85.0 0.869
,90.0 1.000
- 100.0 1.000 Page 80 of 107 Page80 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report -Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-3d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2
- I -,*.
1.0 0.8 0.
0.6 U--
.-I 0.4
- q - . *- - - - - q -
- 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 _____ 0.818 85.0 0.869 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 81 of 107 Page81 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision I FIGURE 8.3-4a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC
'. ... .FUEL-TYPE: ...: .... .. . . (I* M * .
1.2 1.0 0.8 (30.
0.6 U-,
z
.. I 0.4 0.2, 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 _____ 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 82 of 107 107LARRev. 1 Page82 o2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-4b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC'TO MOC FUEL TYPE: ; GNF3 1.2 mm 0.8 06 0.0
-II 020 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 , 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 ____ 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 0.999, 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 83 of 107 Page83 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-4c. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL-T'YPE:-....... .... GNE2____________
1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.)
<0.6 0.4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power *; 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 ____ 0.840 50.0 ____ 0.897 70.0 ____ 0.995 85.0 ____ 0.999 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 ____ 1.000 Page 84 of 107 Page84 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-4d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.z 1
- I I -
- I p- U -,.
.- '* .i. ; --
0.8
- 5oo% FloWv 0.
0.6 ......50%"F1* - r
-j 0.4 i _
}
- , 4
- I i
....................... i....................... "i"...................
0.2
............................................ i....................
' i 0.0 p I' - - [ - "
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 ' 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.B48 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 85 of 107 107LARRev. 1 Page85 o2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision I FIGURE 8.3-5a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFAC~)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC
~~NF2 1.2 i
- m i p p p * -
1.0 0.8 - -------- '.- - .] I 4-.-- -
0.6 i { , , * ................
0.4
.(0.6
.1 1. I 1---- I ' I 0.4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60-" 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power _<50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 ____ 0.897 70.0 ____ 0.995 85.0 ____ 0.999
,90.0 ____ 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 86 of 107 Page86 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-5b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.
0.6 C,9
,-J 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
.... ' Power (%Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 _____ 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 87 of 107 Page87 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-5c. OPERA-TING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC
-FLUJFL--'IY"-PF . . . . . .. .. GNF2 1.2
' 1 II _
, 'I I ,
1.0
.. .. . .. T .. .-..... .. ... . .. ....-. ... ..
i..-.-i . . . .. .T. ... . . . . . .i. .. .... .. . ..
0.8
-t -i I - - ,- - - -i C.,
I -
C.-,
0.6 - . -*1.
.-- ... ... -.............. .. . ....... I-----....- .... ....--...........--. . ......--... .......-. .......... ............ 1.......-....
0.4 II~o Fpo-i I y -
I 0.2 0.0 0 10. 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power ___50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848, 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 ____ 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 88 of 107 Page88 o2015-01107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-5d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5S EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TOEOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 - . pI* p .p 1.0 I.. J.. .... .. . . .. ..'-- . . . . .. .. . .........--
. . .J .. -. . . . .. 1 . . . - . . . .. .*. . . . . . . . . .
0.8 II ((( I I I - ----- .1...-- - -- -- ---- .) --.-- - .- -*--
0 0.6 U-0
~1 II I m o% F-----------------------II
-I--o 0.4
-I - , Lq -" - 9 - q 9 Y - -I 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 *50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power -<50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.840.
50.0 _____ 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 0,999 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 89 of 107 Page89 o2015-01Rev 107LAR 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-6a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC
-FUEL--TYPE: ... . NE2 1.2 U .- .- .- .- .- .a .a .a
÷.......... 4.............. +;_
1.0 -----------------------------------
vE- - i i 0.8
- a. -. *o5o% Fluov
<0.6
-IL 0.4 -*. ....... .-....... .. ...- + --.. .-.. --.......
.. ..... i i.........÷.......
t 0.2 I. . . . . ii. . . . :i . . . . . . . . . . . .
J 0.0 as as a! apa 5a pa 1 1 0 .10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power _<50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 0.820 85.0 0.869 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 90 of 107 Page90 o2OI5-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-6b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOG TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 m 1.0 S0.6 C,.
C 0.0 -
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Fiow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.688.
50.0 _____ 0.738 70.0 0.820 85.0 0.869 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1,000 Page 91 of 107 107LARRev.
Page91 o2015-01 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 1.9 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-6c. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC
- FUEL-1YPE: .... . ..... NF_2' 1 .2 u. , u .. mm u..m
- um 1.0-
.. --.. - . ....... --.. .. .. .. .. ... . . .l!i=-
-I ------ *-- *--- l-- - 4- -
-V 0.8 0.
-I, I I I
,,*0.6 . . . . .- 1.
4 I
- ii U- . .. . . > 0 /-F-i - . ... T . .. . .... r.... ... i. . ...... r..... . .. r. ...... ............. ! .. .... .. ..... ..
0.4 m m p 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1O00 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0O ____ 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 0.818 85.0 ' 0.869 90.0 1.000 100.0 ____ 1.000 Page 92 of 107 Page92 o2015-01107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-6d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2
- I S- - I - - , S *,, S 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 . .... O ..- ........ .L.. .... .. . .....---..-. . -- _ ...- .-.---- -. _i _.. ..---
- ...--... .-......... - - - - ...-.,. . .. . .. . . .. . .-- L7 .. .i -
0.7 FloW-V-------.-
S>50%
0.
0.6 U--
0.5 ' * *1...........................
-I 0.4 i L
- I . i..
0.3 - - qo - -
0.2 0.1 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 _____ 0.688 50.0 -, 0.738 70.0 0.818 85.0 0.869 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 93 of 107 Page93 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-7a OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL--TYPE: GNF2 1.2 1.0 0.8 C.9, 0.6 U--
,CI 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 0.820 85.0 ______ 0.869 90.0 ____ 1.000 100.0 ____ 1.000 Page 94 of 107 Page94 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-7b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 SF ,u t U 1.0 0.8 0~
- lI I *1I I 0
0.6 IL C,
=
~1 0.4
.....7....
....-.......-... . . . . J ..-..-..
- I' .I .... I
- * - : - - - p 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 ____ 0.820 85.0. 0.869 90.0 ____ 1.000 100.0 ____ 1.000 Page 95 of 107 Page95 o2015-01 107LAR Rev. I
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-7c. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL-TYRPE: "' ( NF2 1.2 . - p - c p - I -
1.0 r ...................... *........... I.
T............. *................. r...............
iiiiii 0.8
- <50.0% FIc
,*0.6 C.)
<0.6 I '
0.4
- q - - I - I * ! - i 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
SPower < 50.0%
(.%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592
.40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 _____ 0.738 70.0 0.818 85.0 .869 O____
90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 96 of 107 Page96 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 FIGURE 8.3-7d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFAC*)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2
- U I I . .~
1.0 i -7........"] ....
..i ................ ....T....... .... i . .... .... ....r ....... ... ... .... ........ .... ..... .... .... ... ....... ....
t 0/iW~~- i i ! .... i. -
0.8 I i -i-- - -----]-
.-- .-- I- -',/
---A.----- -- i #'-*i 0.6 U--
-I ,
- i . . L _.... ......... ... ..... . ...
0.4
... . . ...- . -. . . . . 9
.I.... ... . . .. . . . 9*.... .. .. . ...... ....- . .. .. .. .
0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 0.818 85.0 0.869 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 97 of 107 107LARRev. 1 Page97 o2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 Figure 9.t-1: Monitored Region Boundary (Case 1) 120 110 100 90 80 "70 a- GO
,50 wJ 40 0
0J 30 20 10 0
80 90 100 110 CORE FLOW (% rated)
Page 98 of 107 Page98 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 Figure 9.1 -2: Monitored Region Boundary (Case 2) 920 U* :o. . .. -;.... .......... ....
o, 10 , , , i ___
0 10 2.0 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 CORE FLOW (% rated)
Page 99 of 107 Page99 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 Figure 9.1-3: APR14 Flow Biased Simulated Thermal 'Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted Region Boundary (Two Recircula~tion Loop Operation - Case 4) 120 I I I I I I I I
- * - $- - -4 110 ... .- 4 ...- .. -- ..-4... -....
.- .-4.... . .4.. -... .- .A..-.. ... .. ... .. .. ... .. .-
100-I I o ina au 90* *
- - - - - - - - - ._I. I_ . .. , . ...
80- "I F -- ... .. I" I Allow .b . Value .I.. . .. ".. . .
7 0-II '
LtI 60-0 / I... R.trited.gio ta- 60 OL 4oT- - -i -- egon4 -d ......
-- - - --- 4 - +------.r....,....-4--
40.
30.
20, I II
L-F.. . "4. . . .÷. .. . II ....i... Iii ii l
. .I . J -. . .L-. .. . ... ...- . -L... .. .
10.
0 tO 20 30 40 80 50 70 80 90 100 11*0 120 AUIGNED DRIVE FLOW (% rated)
LAR 2015-01 Rev. 1 Page 100 of 107
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 Figure 9.-4: APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted Region Boundary (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2)
,oo *I I I I I i-I __ . . . . .
0ii*
- I*-i- -. -~ __ I S i ....... . - !
AL1..4E ORIV F .O r.e Page 101 of 107 2015-01 Page 01 o107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 Figure 9.1-5: APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted Region Boundary (Single Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1) 17 IIIIII I I I I I II I I I I 11 I III I 2I I I I I I I I I I- _ I-I iII I I I I I I 10 S
e I I a 20= es rite Reio C
4,4
'-7 IIIII IIII I I 0 .... I I. " 'I..
a.
0 I ,I ' fI" I ? I I I i . IIII 0 I I I I I I I I A . . . -I.. . . . T . . . I- . . . - . . . TI. . . . I. . . . "1 - r . . . . .
I , I I I I I I I o II , I II 1
0 10 20 30 40 50 50 70O 50 50 100 110 120 AUGNED DRIVE FLOW (% rated)
Page 102 of 107 Page 02 2OI5-01 o107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 Figure 9.1-6: APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power -. High Scram Setpoints and Restricted Region Boundary (Single Recirculation Loop Operation -.Case 2) "
0
- . 4 A
- i * ** ". *3/4 .
Page 103 of 107 Page 03 o 107LAR 2015-01 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Care Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision I Figure 9.1-7: APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1) 120 110]
100 I I I 90 I I II1I 80 I II1 ..- rII I=
I IIIII ' II I I
.I.
I
-I. . .
I
-- --- -- -- I ... s S tu -I-B oc -- . i -
I I I No-Stu Ro-lc I S70 IIIIII - I1II I n- / -TI r I I 60 Ili S50 IIII I I I I I I I 0* I I I I t I I I I I I C- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ".I 40 30 20 10-0 i l = I ' f I ' I ' I ' ' I
' I I , I ' I 0 10 20 30 411 60 60 70 50 00 100 110 120 AUGIGNED DRiVE FLOW (%4 rated)
Page 104 of 107 Page 04 o 2015-01 107LARRev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 Figure 9.1-8:. APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2) i a ' ......... i.
t a:: .. " - * ! ! ___
- .... . ...... ...... . * ' - I-i_ ,--
' !AL .i _ _,oov*
a:I /
2'j-A1IGNE* OiliVS FLOW l*rot)
Page 105 of 107 LAR 2015-01 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 Figure 9.1-9: APRNT FLow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Single Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1) 120 90 I IIIi I I IiII I
- "80- I I I I . I Il I I I I I
-,/I I I s I tu Ro-lk I
/INo-I/
, I
-. ,i - -I.___ IIIII II I
[ - - L - I - .- - - - 4I. - I - . I 40 3-20 40 0 10 20 30 40 50 80 70) 80 20 1*0 110 120 AUIGNED DRIVE FLOW (% rated)
Page 106 of 107 LAR 2015-01 Rev. 1
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 1 Figure 9.1-10: APRM Flow Bhased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Single Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2)
- Q 0+/-
LU~
a 0.
a o ~.
- ~ I
- ALiGNED Qf~iVE FLOW (%rated~
Page 107 of 107 Page 07 o2015-01 107LARRev. 1