RBG-47648, Nineteenth Fuel Cycle Core Operating Limits Report, Revision 2 River Bend Station - Unit 1 Docket No. 50-458 License No. NPF-47

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Nineteenth Fuel Cycle Core Operating Limits Report, Revision 2 River Bend Station - Unit 1 Docket No. 50-458 License No. NPF-47
ML16049A257
Person / Time
Site: River Bend Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 02/11/2016
From: Clark J
Entergy Operations
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
RBF1-16-0015, RBG-47648
Download: ML16049A257 (110)
v • d • e


Text

,/ /J

~Entorgy Operations, Inc.

River Bend Station

-- 71.yLo 5485 U..Hgh" i wN-- St. Franojsville, LA 70775 "Tel225-381-4177 Joseph A. Clark Manager, Regulatory Assurance February 11,2016 RBG- 47648 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555

Subject:

Nineteenth Fuel Cycle Core Operating Limits Report, Revision 2 River Bend Station - Unit 1 Docket No. 50-458 License No. NPF-47

Dear Sir or Madam:

Enclosed is Revision 2 of the River Bend Station (RBS) Core Operation Limits Report (COLR) for the nineteenth fuel cycle. This report is submitted in accordance with Technical Specification 5.6.5 of Appendix A of the Facility Operating License NPF-47.

This letter does not contain any commitments.

For further information, plea* contact me at (225) 381-4177.

cc: Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV 1600 East Lamar Blvd.

Arlington, TX 76011-4511

RBG-47648 Page 2 of 2 NRC Senior Resident Inspector P. 0. Box 1050 St. Francisville, LA 70775 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Mr. Stephen S. Koenick MS 8 B1A One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MVD 20852 Department of Environmental Quality Office of Environmental Compliance Radiological Emergency Planning and Response Section Ji Young Wiley P.O. Box 4312 Baton Rouge, ILA 70821-4312 Public Utility Commission of Texas Attn: PUC Filing Clerk 1701 N. Congress Avenue P. 0. Box 13326 Austin, TX 78711-3326 RBFI 0015

Core Operating Limits Report Cycle 19 Revision 2

CrG Operatiwg Litmits e*

Revsion 2 Page 1 Of 107 Page1 of107LAR 20I6-01 Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 REVISION HISTORY Revision Description Original Issue Editorial change to: 1) Correct Figures 7,1-la through 7.1-7b to change the graph vertical axis label from MCPRp to MCPRF consistent with the figure title and input reference data, and correct the heading of the first column on the associated table located below each graph from Power (% Rated) to Flow (%Rated); 2) Correct Figures 8.2-1a through 8.2-7b to change the graph vertical axis label from LHGRFACp to LHGRFACF consistent with the figure title and input reference data. 3) Replaced duplicate Figure 8.2-4b on page 62 with the correct Figure 8.2-4a including vertical axis label correction described in item 2. 4) Added omitted figure number and first line of title to Figure 8.3-6b on page 91 and Figure 8.3-6c on page 92.

Editorial change to : update reference as needed to reflect updated licensing assessment after FO-16-01 to remove multiple fuel leakers. Fuel vendor updated licensing evaluation (COLR Ref.3.1.5) of reloaded core. EC62442 provides reload evaluation of changes made in FO 01, and demonstrated that BOC19 operating limits continue to apply to operation of RBS C19B core after FO-16-01.

Page 2 of 107 Page2 of107LAR 2016-01 Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report- Cycle 19 Revision 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PURPOSE ..................................................................................... 4 2.0 SCOPE......................................................................................... 4

3.0 REFERENCES

................................................................  ;................. 4 3.1 CURRENT CYCLE REFERENCES ......................................................................................... 4 3.2 METHODOLOGY REFERENCES ........................................................................................... 4 4.0 DEFINITIONS ................................................................................. 4 5.0 CORE DESIGN................................................................................ 7 5.1 REFERENCE CORE LOADING PATTERN ........................................................................ ,..........7 5.2 CONTROL RODS........................................................................................................... 7 6.0 AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (APLHGR)................. 7 7.0 MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPR)............................................. 7 7.1 FLOW-DEPENDENT MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPRF)VALUES: ........................................... 7 7.2 POWER-DEPENDENT MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPRp) VALUES: ......................................... 8 8.0 LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (LHGR).............................................. 8 8.1 EXPOSURE-DEPENDENT LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (LHGR) VALUES: .... ................................... 8 8.2 FLOW-DEPENDENT LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE FACTORS (LHGRFACF) VALUES:............................ 9 8.3 FLOW-DEPENDENT LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE FACTORS (LHGRFACF) VALUES ................ .9 9.0 STABILITY .................................................................................... 9 9.1 STABILITY REGION BOUNDARIES AND SETPOINTS...................... .... ;........................................... 10 9.2 APRM FLOW BIASED SIMULATED THERMAL POWER-HIGH TIME CONSTANT (SR 3,3.1.1t.14)................... 11 Page 3 of 107 Page3 of107LAR 2016-01 Rev.O0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 1.0 PURPOSE The COLR is controlled as a License Basis Document and revised accordingly for each fuel cycle or remaining portion of a fuel cycle. Any revisions to the COLR must be submitted to the NRC for information as required by Tech Spec 5.6.5 and tracked by RBS License Commitment LI11358.

'7 2.0 SCOPE As defined in Technical Specification 1.1, the COLR Is the document that provides the core operating limits for the current fuel cycle. This document is prepared in accordance with Technical Specification 5.6.5 for each reload cycle using NRC-approved analytical methods.

The limits included in this report are:

1) LCO 3.2.1, Average Planar Unear Heat Generation Rate (APLHGR),
2) LCO 3.2.2, Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPR), including power and flow dependent limits.
3) LCD 3.2.3, Linear Heat Generation Rate (LHGR), including power and flow dependent limits.
4) LCO 3.2.4, Fraction of Core Boiling Boundary (FCBB)
5) LCD 3.3.1.1, RPS Instrumentation (RPS), Function 2.b
6) LCD 3.3.1.3, Periodic Based Detection System (PBDS)

3.0 REFERENCES

This section contains the background, cycle-specific, and methodology references used in the current cycle reload analysis.

3.1 Current Cycle References 3.1.1 ECH-NE-14-00048 Revision 0, Supplemental Reload Licensing Report for River Bend Station -

Unit I with GNF3 - Unit t Reload 18 Cycle 19.

3.1.2 ECH-NE-1 4-00049 Revision 0, Fuel Bundle Information Report for River Bend Station - Unit 1 Reload 18 Cycle 19.

3.1.3 Letter, R. E. Kingston to G. W. Scronce, ='Time Constant Values for Simulated Thermal Power Monitor", RBC-46410, November 30, 1995.

3.1.4 RBS Updated Safety Analysis Report 3.1.5 ECH-NE-15-00004, Revision 2, "RBS C19 GESTAR Assessment" 3.2 Methodology References The Technical Specifications (TS) supported by each methodology reference are provided In brackets.

The following are applicable to GNF supplied fuel.

3.2.1 NEDE-2401 1-P-A, General Electric Standard Application for Reactor Fuel (GESTAR-Il).

4.0 DEFINITIONS Page 4 of 107 Page4 of107LAR 2016-0l Rev. 0

  • River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 4.1 Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (APLHGR) - the APLHGR shall be applicable to a specific planar height and is equal to the sum of the linear heat generation rates for all the fuel rods in the specified bundle at the specified height divided by the number of fuel rods in the fuel bundle.

4.2 Average Planar Exposure - the Average Planar Exposure shall be applicable to a specific planar height and is equal to the sum of the exposure of all the fuel rods in the specified bundle at the specified height divided by the number of fuel rods in the fuel bundle.

4.3 Critical Power Ratio (CPR) - the ratio of that power in the assembly, which is calculated by application of the fuel vendor's appropriate boiling correlation, to cause some point in the assembly to experience boiling transition, divided by the actual assembly operating power.

4.4 Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) - The River Bend Station specific document that provides core operating limits for the current reload cycle in accordance with Technical Specification 5.6.5.

4.5 Linear Heat Generation Rate (LHGR) - the LHGR shall be the heat generation per unit length of fuel rod. It is the integral of the heat flux over the heat transfer area associated with the unit length.

4.6 Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPR) - the MCPR shall be the smallest CPR which exists in the core.

4.7 MCPR Safety Limit - the minimum value of the CPR at which the fuel could be operated with the expected number of rods in boiling transition not exceeding 0.1% of the fuel rods in the core.

4.8 Aligned Drive Flow - Adjusted FCTR card input drive flow signal that accounts for actual variations in the core flow to drive flow relationship.

4.9 Monitored Region - The area of the core power and flow operating domain where the reactor may be susceptible to reactor instabilities under conditions exceeding the licensing basis of the current reactor system.

4.10 Restricted Region - The area of the core power and flow operating domain where the reactor is susceptible to reactor instabilities in the absence of restrictions on core void distributions.

4.11 Setpoint "Setup" - A FCTR card feature that sets the normal "non-setup" EIA APRM flow-biased scram and control rod block trip reference setpoints associated with the Exclusion and Restricted Regions higher to permit required reactor maneuvering in the Restricted Region when stability controls are in effect.

4.12 EOR - the cycle exposure corresponding to all rods out, 100% power/100% flow, and normal feedwater temperature.

4.13 MOC - Middle of Cycle (EOR- 2,794 MWdlMTU) [Reference 3.1.1, page 19].

4.14 EOC - End of Cycle (Core Exposure 35,094 MWd/MTU) [Reference 3.1.1. page 6].

4.15 FFWVTR - Final Feedwater Temperature Reduction.

4.16 FHOOS - Feedwater Heater Out of Service.

4.17 PROOS - Pressure Regulator Out of Service.

4.18 SLO - Single Loop Operation.

Page 5 of 107 PageSf 2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 4.19 TBOOS -Turbine Bypass Out of Service 4.20 AREVA -AREVA NP Inc.

4.21 GNF - Global Nuclear Fuel 4.22 EOC-RPT - End of Cycde Recirculation Pump Trip 4.23 Reference Core Loading Pattern - The Core Loading Pattern Used for Reload Licensing Analysis.

4.24 Application Condition - The combination of equipment out of service conditions for which LHGRFAC and MCPR limits are determined (Reference 3.1.1, page 38]. The Application Conditions are as follows:

I Application FWHOOS I EOC-RPT PROOS TBOOS Condition FFWTR OOS ___ _________

1 x 2 X X 3 X X 4 X X 5 X X X 6 X _ _ _X X 7 X X X X All application conditions address the licensed core flow.

Page 6 of 107 Page6 of107LAR 2016-01 Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 5.0 CORE DESIGN 5.1 Reference Core Loading Pattern The original Reference Core Loading pattern is presented in Reference 3.1.1.

During the core shuffle a fuel failure was identified. This bundle was scheduled to be shuffled, but because of the failure was discharged and replaced with a similar bundle that was scheduled for discharge. The revised core loading was evaluated in Reference 3.1.5 with the determination that the reload evaluation results were applicable to the revised core.

5.2 Control Rods The River Bend core utilizes the GE design control rods, non GE design CR-82M and CR-82M-1 bottom entry cruciform control rods. These control rod designs are discussed in more detail in Reference 3.1.4, Sections 4.1 and 4.2.

6.0 AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (APLHGR)

Per Technical Specification 3.2.1, all APLHGR values shall not exceed the exposure-dependent limits reported as follows:

Fuel Type Figure GNF2 6.1-la GNF3 6.1-lb For single loop operation (SLO) a multiplier of 0.83 [Reference 3.1.1, page 58] is applied to the APLH-GR limits for all fuel types.

7.0 MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPR)

Per Technical. Specification 3.2.2, the MCPR values shall be equal to or greater than the operating limit.

The operating limit is the maximum of the flow-dependent minimum critical power ratio (MCPRF) and the power-dependent minimum critical power ratio (MCPRp).

MCPRF and MCPRp limits are provided in Sections 7.1 and 7.2 below. These limits address the different fuel types, exposure ranges and application conditions.

For single recirculation loop operation (SLO), the MCPR limit is increased by 0.02 [Reference 3.1.1, page 34] to address the difference in the safety limit MCPR reported in Technical Specification 2.1.1.2.

7.1 Flow-Dependent Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPRF) Values:

The MCPRF curves are from Reference 3.1.1, Appendix D as augmented by Reference 3.1.1, Appendix F and are found in the following figures:

Application gue Condition GNF2 GNF3 I7.1-la 7.1-lb Page 7 of 107 Page7 of107LAR 2016-01 Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 Application Figures Condition GNF2 GNF3 2 7.1-2a 7.1-3b 3 7.1-3a 7.1-3b 4 7.1-4a 7.1-4b 5 7.1-5a 7.1-5b 6 7.1-6a 7.1-6b 7 1.1-la 7.1-lb 7.2 Power-Dependent Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPRp) Values:

The MCPRp curves are from Reference 3.1.1, Appendix D as augmented by Reference 3.1.1, Appendix F and are found in the following figures:

Figure (

Application BOG - MOC MOC - EOC Condition GNF2 GNF3 GNF2 GNF3 1 7.2-la 7.2-lb 7.2-Ic 7.2-Id 2 7.2o2a 7.2-2b 7.2-2c 7.2-2d 3 7.2-3a 7.2-3b 7.2-3c 7.2-3d 4 7.2-4a 7.2-4b 7.2-4c 7,2-4d 5 7.2-5a 7.2-Sb 7.2-Sc 7.2-Sd 6 7.2-6ia 7.2-6b 7.2-6c 7.2-6d 7 7.2-la 7.2-lb 7.2-7c 7.2-7d More limiting operating values mode. For of the power example EOCdependent values maylimits may instead be used be usedofinthe lieuMOO of those indicated by a particular values.

8.0 LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (LHGR)

Per Technical Specification 3.2.3, the LHGR values for any rod at any axial location shall not exceed the exposure-dependent limits multiplied by the smaller of either the power-dependent or flow-dependent LHGR factors.

For single loop operation (SLO) a multiplier of 0.83 [Reference 3.1.1, page 551 is applied to the LHGR limits for all fuel types.

For two recirculation loop and single recirculation loop operation the LHGR multiplier is as follows:

For two recirculation loop operation:

LHGRFAC = MIN(LHGRFACp, LHGRFACF)

For single loop operation:

LHGRFAC = MIN(LHGRFACp, LHGRFACF, 0.83) 8.1 Exposure-Dependent Linear Heat Generation Rate (LHGR) Values:

Page 8 of 107 2O16-01 Rev. 0 Page8 of107LAR

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 GNF2 and GNF3 exposure-dependent LHGR values are considered GNF proprietary and will not be conitained in the COLR. The GNF2 LHGR values may be found in Reference 3.1.2, page 3. Per Reference 3.1.1, Appendix F the GNF2 exposure dependent LHGR values may be applied to the GNF3 fuel.

8.2 Flow-Dependent Linear Heat Generation Rate Factors (LHGRFACF) Values:

The LHGRFACF curves are from Reference 3.1.1, Appendix D as augmented by Reference 3.1.1, Appendix F and are found in the following figures:"

Application Figures Condition GNF2 GNF3 1 8.2-la 8.2-lb 2 8.2-2a 8.2-2b 3 8.2-3a 8.2-3b 4 8.2-4a 8.2-4b 5 8.2-5a 8.2-5b 6 8.2-6a 8.2-6b 7 8.2-7a 8.2-7b 8.3 Power-Dependent Linear Heat Generation Rate Factors (LHGRFACp) Values:

The LHGRFACp curves are from Reference 3.1.1, Appendix D as au~gmented by Reference 3.1.1, Appendix F and are found in the following figures:

Figure Application BOG - MOC MOC - EOC Conditions GNF2 GNF3 GNF2 GNF3 18.3-la 8.3-lb 8.3-1c 8.3-1d 2 8.3-2a 8.3-2b 8.3-2c 8.3-2d 3 8.3-3a 8.3-3b 8.3-3c 8.3-3d 4 8.3-4a 8.3-4b 8.3-4c 8.3-4d 5 8.3-5a 8.3-4b 8.3-5c 8.3-5d 6 8.3-6a 8.3-4b 8.3-6c 8.3-6d 7 8,3-7a 8.3-4b 8.3-7c 8.3-7d More limiting values of the power dependent multipliers may be used in lieu of those indicated by a particular operating mode. For example EOC values may be used instead of the MOC values.

9.0 STABILITY The following Technical Specifications I Technical Requirements contain stability related requirements:

  • TS 3.2.4, Fraction of Core Boiling Boundary (FOB B)
  • "IS 3.3.1.1, RPS Instrumentation (RPS)
  • TIS 3.3.1.3, Periodic Based Detection System (PBDS)

Page 9 of 107 2016-01 Rev. 0 Page9 of107LAR

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 STR 3.3.2.1, Control Rod Block Instrumentation 9.1 Stability Region Boundaries and Setpoints This section contains region boundaries, setpoints and other stability related requirements. The stability region boundaries and setpoints are as follows Description Figure Monitored Region Boundary (Case 1) 9.1-1 Monitored Region Boundary (Case 2) 9.1-2 APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted 9.1-3 Region Boundary (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1)______

APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted 9.1-4 Region Boundary (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2) _____

APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted 9.1-5 Region Boundary (Single Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1)______

APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted 9.1-6.

Region Boundary (Single Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2)

APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Two Recirculation Loop 9.1-7 Operation - Case 1) ______

APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Two Recirculation Loop 9.1-8 Operation - Case 2)

APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux*- High Rod-Block Setpoints (Single Recirculation 9.1-'9 Loop Operation - Case 1)

APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Single Recirculation 9.1-10 Loop Operation - Case 2) _____

Note: For Figures 9.1-3 to 9.1-10, the Nominal Setpoints should be used for indicating the entry into a particular stability region as allowed and appropriate actions be taken prior to the entry In the table above, two distinct operating states (Case 1 and Case 2) are considered. These are descri bed as follows:

Case I - Normal Feedwater Heatingq Operation or Low Reactor Power :

TFW (at rated) Ž T~v*SIGN (at rated) - 5Q0 F, and rated equivalent at off-rated reactor conditions OR P<~30%

Case 2 - Reduced Feedwater Heating Operation:

TFW (at rated) < T*-s'GN (at rated) - 500 F AND P >30%

Page 10 of 107 Page10 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision ,2 The APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High scram setpoint and Rest'icted Region Boundary, and APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints are given interms of aligned drive flow. The aligned drive flow is calculated from the input drive flow using the following relationship:

101.209 x A40 - 31.028 x A100 + 70.181 x W we 70.181 - (Ab°° - A0 Where: W5 = FCTR card input drive flow in percent rated, WD = Aligned drive flow in percent rated, A4° Low flow drive flow alignment setting, and A1°= High flow drive flow alignment setting.

9.2 APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power-High Time Constant (SR 3.3.1.1,14)

The simulated thermal power time constant is 6 +/- 0.6 seconds (Reference 3.1.3). Thus the maximum simulated thermal power time constant for use in meeting the surveillance requirement is 6.6 seconds.

Page 11 of 107 107LARRev. 0 Page11 o2016-01

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 6.1-la. MAXIMUM AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (MAPLHGR) VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE FUEL TYPE: GNF2 15 14 13 12 11 10 09 8 7

,-J

..J 6

5 4

3 2

0 20 40 60 80 Average Planar Exposure (GWD/M TU)

Average Planar MAPLHGR Limit Exposure (kW/ft) 0.00 13.78 19.31 13.78 67.00 7.50 70.00 6.69 Page 12 of 107 Page12 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 6.1-lb. MAXIMUM AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (MAPLHGR) VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE FUEL TYPE: GNF3 15 14 13 12 11 10 9

8 C, 7 6

5 4

3 2

1 0

0 20 40 60 80 Average Planar Exposure (GWD/MTU)

Average Planar MAPLHGR Limit 0.00ur 13.78t Ex.s0r 13.78t 19.31 13.78 67.00 7.50 70.00 6.69

.Page 13 of 107 Page13 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.1-1a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE FLOW (MCPRF)

APPLICATION CONDITON:t FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.5 -

1.4 1.3 .. .

n 1.2 1.1 ... . -

1.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow j Loop

(%Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.26 1.34 30.0 1.26 1.34 50.0 1.20 1.27 72.0 1.20 1.20 100.0 1.20 1.20 109.5 1.20 1.20 Page 14 of 107 Page14 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.1-lb. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)

APPLICATION CONDFTION:

FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.5-1.4 1.3

" -- L-oop" 1.2 1.1 1.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow I Loop

(%Rated) Manual Loop~ Auto 20.0 1.26 1.34 30.0 1.26 1.34 50.0 1.20 1.27 72,0 1.20 1.20 100.0 1.20 1.20 109.5 1.20 1.20 Page 15 of 107 2016-01 Rev.O0 Pagel~of107LAR

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.1-2a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.5-1.3

-- !.oop*

1.2 1.1 1.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow I Loop

(%Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.26 1.34 30.0 1.26 1.34 50.0 1.20 1.27 72.0 1.20 1.20 100.0 1.20 1.20 109.5 1.20 1.20 Page 16 of 107 Page16 o2O16-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Revision 2 Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 FIGURE 7.1-2b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)

APPLICATION CON~mON: 2 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.5 -

1.4 . .. i 1.3 1.23 -_

1.1 1.0 -

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 60 90 100 110 Flow, (%Rated)

Flow I Loop

(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.26 1.34 30.0 1.26 1.34 50.0 1.20 1.27 72.0 1.20 1.20 100.0 1.20 1.20 109.5 1.20 1.20 Page 17 of 107 Page17 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report Revision 2

- Cycle 19 FIGURE 7.1-3a, OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 FUEL TYPE: GN F2 1.5-1.4 1.3-1.2 1.1 . . . .

1.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)

Flow I Loop

(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.26 1.34 30.0 1.26 1.34 50.0 1.20 1.27 72.0 1.20 1.20 100.0 1.20 1.20 109.5 1.20 1.20 Page 18 of 107 Page18 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.1-3b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.5 -

1.4 .. . ..

1.3 . ..

LI C

C

--- I 1.1 1.0 .q 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow I Loop

(%Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.26 1.34 30.0 1.26 1.34 50.0 1.20 1.27 72.0 1.20 1.20 100.0 1.20 1.20 109.5 1.20 1.20 Page 19 of 107 Page19 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report- Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.1-4a, OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.4 .. . ---

--- oop-*Aar a.

U 1.2 1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)

Flow I Loop

(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 1:33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page 20 of 107 Page20 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7,1-4b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.4

.... . . .p ....

1.3-1 U-0o 1.2 1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow l Loop

(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page 21 of 107 Page21 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.1-5a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)

APPUCATION CONDITION: 5 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.5-L-oF 1.4 1.3 -

1.2 . .. ....

1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)

Flow I Loop

(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page 22 of 107 Page22 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.1-5b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.4 _L. ia C.,

1.2 1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)

Flow I Loop

(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page 23 of 107 Page23 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.1 -6a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.5 . - . m I I l I

... -s-----L- * ' . I-----... ------

  • 1...

1.4

.. . .. .I- - .. .* * .- - -* * ... . . . 4 ...  : . . . . .. . .t- -- ...t.... ... .

1.3

" , , il *I F--.. "*

0. . .. . . . ..I. . . .

(3 1.2 I I 1 II

!. ... m r .. .. ,4. .- . .. - . .. ,- * - 9....,---

1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 .60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)

Flow I Loop

(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page 24 of 107 Page24 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGUR~E 7.1-6b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRr)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.5 ,

! i I I I i

--_ L_ o.D.A~utD . .. - - i . ..... t.... .J .....  ! . .. .. . ._ . ... .L .. .

- - --* .... ... - - -* -..... . ..4 -- -- - - - -.. 4. ... . . . .

1.4 ---- oo4au --- .. .- . . . .- ...--*~ --- 1---E . .---------*-i-- - -. .. . .

--- - ".. -.. . -t---. -- . .. . -- -.. . .I--- = . . . . .I . . .. {. . . . . .

1.3 S " I I I

.,)

. . .... 1-..... 1 S I I I ____ I ____ll I ___

1.2 i 1i I !ii

.. . .m . -y. . . . P. . . " * . . .* '- - * . . . - - - . . t - - - -

1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

FlowlI Loop

(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page 25 of 107 Page25 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.1-7a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow' (MC PRF)

APPLICATION CONDITON: 7 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.5-

__ L__.

1.4

--- Loop 1.3 L

C C

C 1.2 1.1 1.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow I Loop

(%Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page 26 of 107 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0 Page26

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.1-7b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.5 Lo 1.4 1.3 -

C

(

1.2 . .

1.1 --: .. i 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow I Loop

(%Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 1.33 1.36 100.0 .1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page 27 of 107 Page27 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-1a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRP)

APPLICATION CONDITION:

EXPOSURE RANGE: BOG TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 ... ... .. -. . - .. .. - *......- .. .. * .... . - ..... .... n -... . .S .

-- , *.. . --- - i -..... ..... ' - .- -- I-- -

2.8 2.6

  • i !i 1 2.4 2.2 . .... * -,--- - --p --- --' 4..... .. ... ... . .i+ .- . ..-- . . .

i . . . 2 ..

  • --* ... . , ..... i :----- r- -- - - . .* -. . . . . - - - - -. .
a. 2.0 U

*.o%*o,-w--%T~~~~...

i --.... ........ ....... .....*.....T.....r-....I-- ..

1.8 .. . . . . . - .* . . . . . . .I _. . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . _. . .*. . .

. . .- -.. . . . _ - 2_

.. . . . .v ..- -.. - i .. .L . . .

, I  ! i - i  !,

1.6 1.4 2  ! i I2 ' i ._

-. . q ,r.. . - ... . . .. .. i-. .. ....- ,- - - r-- ... - ..

1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 . 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Fbw >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10

'40.0 1.59 50.0 1.59 70.0 1.59 85.0 1.44 85.0 _____ 1.44 90.0 _____ 1.39 100.0 _____ 1.35 Page 28 of 107 Page28 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-lb. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8 2.6 i S

.r t

flf,rl .. ... fi

-'.-- t . . .

... . ,- -. . .. r t

2A I~*oJ,* "--l i .-- 1----. ( I 2.2 a.

a. 2.0

'3 I I ~ i -/ '

1.8 ... ....... . . . . ..---- .. . . .t. . . . .. - t . . . , - - ,5-- - - , . ..

1.6 z t :i".~ 'o 1 * -*,it --- I- - j .- i V -

-... I -... ....- -* -..... --... T--- ". .. - "- - -...

1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power

  • 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40.0 1.64 50.0 1.64 70.0 1.64 85.0 _____ 1.49 85.0 1.49 90.0 1.44 100.0 _____ 1.40 Page 29 of 107 Page29 o 107LAR2016-01 Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-10 OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: I EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 2.8

!*  !  !-i -- .

2.6 I I , 1 I i I

- ' I 2.4 i 1 i--i---,

2.2 n.2.0

..... **o~o%

  • -1------- ------ r.-.....--- I..

. .. . . .... . .r,....*- - -

U i . ....t" "

1.8 iII 1 1.6 I

t. __..

I

_ .. ... - .. . . . . . - -r-. . . . . .

1.4 ......

.L. ........

...i 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 _____ 1.63 50.0 _____ 1.63 70.0 _____ 1.59 85.0 1.48 85.0 1.48 90.0 _____ 1.44 100.0 _____ 1.41 Page 30*107 Page30 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-Id. OPERATING LUMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 2.8

  • 2.6 -......

2.2 -**

a.2.0 1.8 .. .

1.6 12 -.

1.0-0 10 .20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow 1>50% Flow 23.8 2.23 1 2.58 40.0 2.03 I 2,15 I 40.0 _____ 1.68 50.0 _____ 1.68 70.0 _____ 1.64 85.0 1.53 85.0 1.53 90.0 1.49 100.0 _____ 1.46 Page 31 of 107 Page31 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-2a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 2.8 2.6 .. . ....--

2.2 ... .. . ...

". 2.0-1.8 1.6 ..........

1.2 . . .. {. .

10 -p-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power _<50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40.0 1.59 50.0 1.59 70.0 _____ 1.59 85.0 1.46 85.0 __ _ 1.46 90.0 _____ 1.42 100.0 _____ 1.39 Page 32 of 107 Page32 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-2b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MC PRp)

APPLICATION CONDfITON: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 -

2.6 2.4 ........ I-50 2.2i 1.8 ... . . - -

1.6 1.4 -

1.0 m 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power -<50.0%

(% Rated) Row >50% Fkow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40.0 _____ 1.64 50.0 1.64 70.0 1.64 85.0 1.51 85.0 1.51 90.0 1.47 100.0 _____ 1.44 Page 33 of 107 Page33 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-2c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 - .S *- *- *S *- *- .- I- * - S-

... . . . .F . . . . .!. . .*i.. . i. . . . .. . .- t. . . . . . .

2.8 i I !I I'Il  ! I _ _ _ _

2.6

.. .. >5.0%_FIL. ._..* ._ _ .. . .. . *__ _ ._ I _ _ _'_ _

......... I........... T..... ~...1 ... . .

2.2 --- q--- -- C ... i . .T---T---1.* -- -T ... -'-

I I I 0.

0o 2.0 _______ I I_______

- I I I I 1.8 *.. . .I-. . ,. .-. .. -.. ....--:--*..] .. . - -...- .. . -. . I-- --

1.6 1.4

- . - . * .. .. J.. . i...

1.2 m -i....... ..I ".

,'.m..-....* .... . .. - .. .. ..... , . -. . .. - ..

1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power S 50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 1.63 50.0 _____ 1.63 70.0 1.59 85.0 1.51 85.0 1.51 90.0 _____ 1.48 100.0 _____ 1.44 Page34of107 Page34 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-2d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0

- I - - U - - I 2.8

..... 50% e*--1---i i -. i 2.6 1 I1 , i i i 1 2.4

  • 7/o . .. ... 7--......... 7.......

2.2 - - * - - - -TI . . . . .. ..'t. . . . ..-. . .. .T . . ..--. . . -. .

.. .... . ,-- . .. .. .. ... . . .. .. I. .

... . - - -i .. . I. . . .L. . . .* . . .

a. 2.0

.. . . . . I .. .. .... --.--- ----- -.-i .. . ...

1.8

-- . - *..* . . .. . .. . -4 . . - ----

. i.. .... 1 . . .. . ..

. .. ...,. . . . .. ... .. ... ..I.. . . . . .* . . . I - - - t . . . .t . . . . .t. . . .

1.6

....... .. .....1 . i.1... .......... i 17.. . . . 17 F--.........- ......... Z.. . I -f....... ... ..- -

1.4

  • ..... . ... +/- . ....z _ _ .. . _. -.- I___ .. *. ..

1.2 -.. r -....-- - .... 4- - -k . . . . .... ...... -... . .... - . -. ..

1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1(00 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40.0 _____ 1.68 50.0 _____ 1.68 70.0 1.64 85.0 _____ 1.56 85.0 _____ 1.56 90.0 1.53 100.0 _____ 1.49 Page 35 of 107 Page35 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-3a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 2.8 2.6-2.4 2.2 -

1.6 ..- . .. ..

1.4 -

1.2 1.0 - i 0 10 20 30 40 50 60

  • 70 80 90 ,100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power s 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40.0 _____ 2.09 50.0 _____ 1.95 70.0 _____ 1.75 85.0 __ _ 1.64 85.0 __ _ 1.42 90.0 _____ 1.39 100.0 __ _ 1.35 Page 36 of 107 Page36 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-3b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8 .. ...

2 .6 ...........

2.4 .. .. .

=. 2.0 .. .

1.8 - --.

1.6 -- *........

1.4 .... A 1.2 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40.0 2.14 50.0 2.00 70.0 _____ 1.80 85.0 1.69 85.0 1.47 90.0 _____ 1.44 100.0 _____ 1.40 Page 37 of 107 Page37 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-3c, OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0

! t I i _ _ I _ _

2.8 2.6 F -- -- ".-..-,--'-.- .-.-. I  ; I 2.4 J -I ,1  ! t I  !

I  ! " , i I I, 2.2 2.0 ..*". .O F-I,- 4.. "j.. .. . . . . ..-- ... - -- - . .. r -. .

. .. .. -------- . ---.- *.. . . ' --- - -- -- -- -- --- -L -

1.8

.... ] i -.-- _ * -*.- .i..--

,- .. , .. I. ....F . .

1.6 .. .. - i. _* .. . -*_

1.4 k- -..

1.....-

I ..

  • r. .

. . .t - - *

- ... -.. =..

1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >60% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 2.09 50.0 1.99 70.0 __ __ 1.80 85.0 _____ 1.70 85.0 _____ 1.47 90.0 _____ 1.44 100.0 _____ 1.41 Page 38 of 107 Page38 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-3d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 -

2.6 ....

2.4 ..... __

2.2 *

o. 2.0 -- I o

1.8 -- 4 1.6 ....... .

1.4 -. . .i 1.2 .. . .

1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 10 1}3 10 Power (% Rated)

Power s 50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40.0 2.14 50.0 2.04 70.0 _____ 1.85 85.0 _____ 1.75 85.0 1.52 90.0 _____ 1.49 100.0 _____ 1.46 Page 39 of 107 Page39 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-4a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOG TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 .-

2.8 ... ...

2 .6 .........

- 1 2.4 .. .....

2.2 .. . -

,', 2.0 1.8 - .

1.6

  • 1.4 1.0-0 10.20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1030 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40.0 1.64 50.0 _____ 1.59 70.0 1.59 85.0 1.46 85.0 1.46 90.0 1.41 100.0 _____ 1.37 Page 40 of 107 Page40 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operatin~g Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-4b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRP)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 2.8 2.6 . ......-

2.2 2.0 -- <

Ui 1.8 1.6 1.4 . .

  • 1.2 -

1.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power s 50.0%

(%Rated) FRow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40.0 1.69 50.0 1.64 70.0 1.64 85.0 1.51 85.0 1.51 90.0 1.46 100.0 ____ 1.42 Page 41 of 107 Page41 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-4c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 -

2.8 2.6 .....

2.4 2.2 .. *-

n. 2.0 0

1.8 .. . .

1.6 . . ....

1.4 1.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Rlow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 1.66 50.0 _____ 1.65 70.0 _____ 1.61 85.0 ____ 1.51 85.0 1.51 90.0 ____ 1.47 100.0 _____ 1.43 Page 42 of 107 Page42 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-4d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8

>5%Iow i I I ___

2.6 i I I 2.4

.. . ,.. . ---- --- . ---- . ... I. . .--. . . .. . --

22

' Jiii I I a.2.0 1.8

. . . .. . " - z.

1--'--i

-_ __ . . . . . J*U.....

. . .EI... mm..... ... m. . .

.... m.

i ImE ... 'I 1.6 0 .. 10 20.... 30.. 40--- .... 60 70.-- 80. . 90. 100.. 110..

1.4 1.2 1.0 Power (% Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Row 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40.0 1.71 50.0 1.70 70.0 _____ 1.66 85.0 _____ 1.56 85.0 _____ 1.56 90.0 _____ 1.52" 100.0 _____ 1.48 Page 43 of 107 Page43 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-5a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS GORE POWER, (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDmTON: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOG TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0

- . m....",...

..... -r . ..... ....-.

S.. ..

2.8

- .~ .........4......... 4-I.. .. ,....... ,.........*..... ..r . . .

- .1-------.1.. , I 2.6

- i 1*/ -

2.4 -- ~5~L IO. .- -! i i i 2.2

.. .. . -i1.. I --i--- - ....-

A.

o. 2.0 - -- - - __

1.8 1.6 1.4

- - I __ I II 1.2 -- .. -'.. ... * - 4 L_. .. -... d -..... ... . ..

1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40.0 1.64 50.0 _____ 1.59 70.0 1.59 85.0 _____ 1.49 85.0 _____ 1.49 90.0 _____ 1.45 100.0 _____ 1.41 Page44of107 Page44 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-5b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CON DITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8 --- j...

2.6 .. .. i.*

2.4 22---<---*

a.. 2.0 - -- ..

1.6 -1 1.4 .... 2.~.....

1.2 --

1.0 -I 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flew 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40.0 _____ 1.69 50.0 _____ 1.64 70.0 1.64 85.0 _____ 1.54 85.0 _____ 1.54 90.0 _____ 1.50 100.0 _____ 1.46 Page 45 of 107 Page45 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-5c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 2.8~- 4 2.6 2.4 2.2 ---- rw

0. 2.0 UJ 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 1.66 50.0 1.65 70.0 1.61 85.0 1.54 85.0 1.54 90.0 1.51 100.0 ____ 1.46 Page 46 of 107 Page46 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-5d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3,0 2.8 ... .* -

2.6 .....

  • 0 2 .4 ........- ....

2.2 ......

  • o0
a. 2.0 1.8 . . .- ..

1.6 1.4 .. . ..*. .

1.2 - .

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power

  • 50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40.0 1.71 50.0 1.70 70.0 1.66 85.0 1.59 85.0 1.59 9O.0 1.56 100.0 _____ 1.51 Page 47 of 107 Page47 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-6a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 2.8 a..

. . a-... .

SI

- j

_ _ t . .. a.. -

2.6

-- ..... ----.-- r-- t--1i--....!.. . -p- -----

I I _ _ _ I i _ _ _

2.4 * -I,... . - .. . T I "----v----- -I -- 'r' *

- .I --

2.2 ... . . . . .. .. . . ... . . .. . . .

1. . . . . .' .I . I.. L . ... .. ..... . .. . . * . . . . .t . . . .. . . . . . . .
a. 2.0 1.8
  • -*~w

--- *

  • LZ_..... .* -- -- .... ... !.....1 * -

1.6

  • .- -- i *....- .--* ... . *,:--- ** - .--- r. .... -. .

1.4 a...- .. . ....a 4 - - - . . ...- -- a..=--- - --.... 9-__

0 1 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 10 1 1,2

... Powe --- %Ra-te.....d) 1.0 Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40.0 2.09 50.0 _____ 1.95 70.0 ___ _ '1.75 85.0 _____ 1.64 85.0 1.44 90.0 1.41 100.0 _____ 1.37 Page 48 of 107 Page48 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-Sb. OPERATING UMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8 ..... ...

2.6 2.4 . . .

o 2 14 --4J 1.2 --

  • 1.0 -q 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 "110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40.0 2.14 50.0 2.00 70.0 1.80 85.0 1.69 85.0 1.49 90.0 1.46 100.0 _____ 1.42 Page 49 of 107 Page49 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-6c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPIp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 2.8 ... .

2.6 .... . ..

2.2 5 o2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 . . . .

1.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Fbow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 2.09 50.0 1.99 70.0O ____ 1.80 85.0 _____ 1.70 85.0 _____ 1.51

  • 90.0 _____ 1.47 100.0 1.43 Page 50 of 107 Page50 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-6d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: / MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0

__t t j ___

2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2

-- - - *-..... - .. . -* ' -- ... . .*.. . . .. . . * .- .__ .t. . . . ..- . . ...

a.. 2.0 1.8 - .. . .. . . . .. .- ..... .-.-i . - - . .

1.6 1A I i 1 i i 1.2

- ......-  ! .. ... Y- . .. - ... - ---- F----- . ...

1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40.0 2.14 50.0 2.04 70,0 _____ 1.85 85.0 _____ 1.75 85.0 1.56 90.0 _____ 1.52 100.0 _____ 1.48 Page 51 0f107 Page51 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-7a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDfITON: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 o.2.0 1.8, 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power <50.0%

_(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40.0 2.09 50.0 1.95 70.0 1.75 85.0 1.64 85.0 1.47 90.0 1.45 100.0 _____ 1.41 Page 52 of 107 Page52 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7,2-7b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRP)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOG TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8 .. ....

].. .. ."-......

  • Lr- --iz--- '- -.... .. '- ---I

...----- I _ _

  • 1 I 2.6 ,>5O%Fl~ OW I i~

-- --V---4--------*- .... ---l-......---4---........-----4-*-----= -.. ... . r--

2,4 I ** 1 II 2.2

< o ----- I I 2.0

  • i------

-- -- . ... _ .----, __*. ,= __ , . _ .L . ..... .....i . L______

C.,

. ._

  • _ .... _* I_*__

1.8 I .I F r . J I I !I ,

1.6 I ii  ! i 1.4 I

1.2 . . .__.

  • _.._ _ 1 __ * -

z --2.... -.--. . .-- - -.. . .4. ....--. . . -. . .. ..

1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90' 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power

  • 50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40.0 2.14 50.0 2.00 70.0 _____ 1.80 85.0 _____ 1.59 85.0 _____ 1.52

'90.0 _____ 1.50 100.0 _____ 1.46 Page 53of107 Page53 o2016-01107LARRev.O0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19

  • Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-7c* OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0

- -.... * --- i- --- ... *- ---- I -..... ---..

2.8

_ _ _. . . . . .. . .. .. . .. _i_ . . ... L . .. . .

2.6 2.4 I I I I -=--t--i

~ I f I 2.2 a.2.0

. I i I 1.8

  • .------, .Ib* - - * -F - -  :- * - . . ...

1.6 -, - - - 4, 4 r 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Rcw >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 2.09 50.0 1.99 70.0 1.80 85.0 1.70 85.0 1.54 90.0 1.51 100.0 ____ 1.46 Page 54 of 107 Page54 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-7d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION COND!TION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0

  • 2.8 --

2.6 ..... :50 2.4 .. . . . .

2.2 .. .oo o.. 2.0 .. - . ..

Ui 1.8 ' -,'..

I -

106 -........-...

0 ~ 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power <_50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40.0 _____ 2.14 50.0 2.04 70.0 _____ 1.85 85.0 1.75 85.0 1.59 90.0 1.56 100.0 _____ 1.51 Page 55 of 107 Page55 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGU RE 8.2-la. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 -

1.0 -* ~~~

0.8 -4

-- Loopi

~0.6 *-

0.4 - -

0.2 ...... -

0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0,919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 56 of 107 Page56 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.2-lb. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1.0 - _ _ _

0.8

~~1 S0.2 00 -I 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 57 of 107 107LARRev. 0 Page57 o2016-01

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.2-2a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 -

1.0 0 .8 . ..

- ~ Loopj

.0.4 . . .

0.2 ----- o*-

004 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 58 of 107 Page55 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report- Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.2-2b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flaw (LHGRFACF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 . m 1.0 ..

0.8 .. . .

--* Loop )

-j-0.4 0.2 .. . .

0,0 ,

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 59 of 107 Page59 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19

  • Revision 2 FIGURE 8.2-3a, OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 -

1.0 -i 0.8

-- Loop]

,O"0.6 ....- i 0 .4 - * !

0.2 00 .....

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)

Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000

  • Page 60 of 107 107LAR Page60 o20 16-01 Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.2-3b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 - - - * - . - . a 1.0. - __-,'-___

-- Loop Manual: -i  : *" i i o 0.6 .. . ..-..-. . ..--- . ..-. . . . .. _... . . -

-: I i'  !

p"u I

'*I-I l1--+

I  :---Io I -- . .,-. . . -

= I 1

  • i iI

! I , I / /

0. p a p a p a a a 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 61 of 107 Page61 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.2-4a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 -

1.0 0.8

-- Loop 0.6

,-J 0.2 -

0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 62 of 107 o201 Page62 6-01 Rev. 0 107LAR

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8,2-4b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 II i 1.0 ,

.6 I I ___ ____

I I _ _

-- Lo auli - - 11 1

" I I 0.-q - p - -i' -

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1,000 1.000 Page 63 of 107 Page63of107LAR 2016-01 Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.2-5a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2-1.0 0.8

- Loop d0.6 0.4 --

  • 0.2 0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 64 of 107 Page64 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report- Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.2-5b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 - - 1'* I -

i _ _ i,_

IL i iI i".-...--. 1--- -'T .... .. ..I- ,

.. . qI.. . . . ..-... . . . I . . .* . .i .. -. .... i-...- -* . . ..

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1,000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 65 of 107 Page65 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.2-6a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.0 S i I

-J, I I I _

I I I _ _ _ __i 14 .. I*l i  !'

0. - -i I - -  ! - i 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1,000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 66 of 107 Page66 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report- Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.2-6b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 - . - * - - - * - * - * - -

U 0.6

- i I I I I I 0.2 LonMnal--!*"I r iIII _ Ii 0.0 -. . . -. - -.. I* * .. . . .. .. . -

0, 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)

Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 67 of 107 Page67 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Care Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.2-7a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.0 0.8

-* Loop 0.4 0.2 0.0 "

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 68 of 107 107LARRev. 0 Page68 o2016-01

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FRGURE 8,2-7b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2-1.0 0.8 .....

0.4 .. .

0.2 .. . .

0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)

FRow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 69 of 107 Page69 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report,- Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-la. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: I EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 -

1.0 -- _

0.8 _ <

( 0.6 0.4 .. . .

0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 -100 110 Power (%Rated)

Pow~er

  • 50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 ___ __ 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 ___ _ 0.999 90.0 ___ _ 1.000 100.0 ___ __ 1.000 Page 70 of 107 Page70 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report- Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-l b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1.0 0.8 II

.. .. .. .. L 0.6 I * , * '- 1 i.1 - - - - -..... , -. .* -.... *-_ .. .. -..... - ...... . -. .

0.4 0 . . .*...

10. . 20.

. ...... ... 50...60

-30...4.0 70 .... 80 90... 100.....110...

Power  % Rated 0.2 0.0 Power *;50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 _____ 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 71 of 107 Page71 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-I c. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITON: I EXPOSURE RANJGE:. MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 I I I 1.0 S I Il i -- ---- i i I II, 0.8 .. . .... . -L . . . . I.. I3Jl*LII -. . . . . . . .

!1 1 1 I I I

,*0.6 I II

.... .. I-. .. .... 4 -.. . .. . . . .-.. . . . -...

C.,

S i i I I

- -. q - - q I 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power -<50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 _____ O.999 90.0 ____ 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 72 of 107 Page72 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-Id. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 i *! I I I 1.0 _

__ .____ I ______

I I V 0.8 s 50.0% FIo~w

  • i I I j 0.6 0.6 _ __* i*I 1 I C,.

0.4 .1[ I I

-- -* .. . - - --P-.---i-+-..... .....** 4- - -I- - .I..

0.2 + i I , i l t ,

1 .. 1 1  ; I

+ I I t  ; I 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power S 50.0%

(%Rated) Row >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0,687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 _____ 0,995 85.0 0.999 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 73 of 107 Page73 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8,3-2a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MDC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 ,

1.0 . . . .*. .

0.8 - - -_ ..

0.* .0 o,

S0.6 ... @0

-JJ 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)

Power _<50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 _____ 0.995 85.0 ____ 0.999 90.0 ___ __ 1.000 100.0 ___ __ 1.000 Page 74 of 107 Page74 o2016-01 i07LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-2b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 iI  ! I - ,

1.0

... 7 . K.. ... .. . .i -.. ... -... -- *i..

..... I . .

0.8 II iI _____

0.6 I I 0.6 I II i I..... .. .i.. . . .. . . . . .I. ..

< Io 0 0 1

1. . . i1 i . . - * . .-

I .-.- II

.J 0.4

! !I - I iI I

--

  • q---- q-4 ... .. - -*---- ... *------- - -

0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power -<50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 _____ 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 _____ 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 75of107 Page75 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report- Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-2c. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.0 - -

0.8 **

a 0.6 . . .

Lz

.(

0.2---

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power <--50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 _____ 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 _____ 0.999 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 ____ 1.000 Page 76 of 107 Page76 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-2d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAG VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPUCATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.6

  • iI / I f

- I  ! I!

,-1 i I I -- I .,Y 0.4

! !Ii I -I  !  !

0.2 .... y-- ---- t. .. ---- --.... ---- 4.- - . - . -. ..-------- -

0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)

'-Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 ____ 0.995 85.0 ____ 0.999 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 _____ 1,000 Page 77 of 107 Page77 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-3a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.2 .. . . . .

00 -~-

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Powr < 50.0%

(%Rated) FRow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0,O ___ 0.820 85.0 _____ 0.869 90.0 ___ __ 1.0o0 100.0 ___ __ 1.000 Page 78 of 107 Page78 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report- Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-3b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2

  • t 1.0 0.8 .. . _ ..

C,,

0.4 .. .. i 0.2 - -.....

0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power s 50.0%

(%Rated) Row >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 0.820 85.0 0.869 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 79 of 107 Page79 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-3c. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 1.0 .. . .--

I 0.8 L*0.6

(.

II

.I 0.2 0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(% Rated Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0,848 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 .738 O____

70.0O ____ 0.818 85.0 _____ 0.869 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 80 of 107 Page80 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-3d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1.0 -

0.8

_<50.0' 0.6 ....... 50 ILI 0.2 . . .... ;. .

0.0 q 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power -<50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 _____ 0.818'"

85.0 _____ 0,869 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 Page 81 of 107 107LARRev. 0 Page81 o2016-01

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report- Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-4a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION; 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 1.0 0.8

~0.6 .. .-

0.41 0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power

  • 50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 ____ 0.995 85.0 _____ 0.999 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 82 of 107 Page82 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report- Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-4b. OPERATING LIMfT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 i -

1.0 .. .. . .. .

0.8 ----

U.

0.6

-I 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power <*50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 ____ 0.995 85.0 ____ 0.999 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 ____ 1.000 Page 83 of 107 Page83 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-4c. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RAN~GE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 -

1.0 ... . .4 0.8 .. .

S0.6 -- *---

0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 _____ 0.840 50.0 _____ 0.897 70.0 _____ 0.995 65.0 0.999 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 ____ 1.000 Page 84 of 107 Page84 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-4d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp=)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1 .2 1.0 0.8 1 I i  !!

I iI!,

,I,  ! , I I I 0.6

' I i i i U--

0.4 I I

.. .. . * . . - . .. .. . ... p-.. . . . . . -- - - -p---4y 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power -<50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 ____ 1.000 Page 85 of 107 Page85 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 0.3-5a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPUCATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 1.0 . . .

0.8 c .6 CJ.

Uv 0.4 0.2 .. .. .

0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power *_50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0,745 0.592 40.0 0,868 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 _____ 0.995 85.0 ____ 0.999 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 86 of 107 Page86 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-5b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

AP)PLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1.0 '- °.- - - - .... - . -I. ......... *

  • - I I 0.8 I ;I D0.6 0.4 I I I!

0.2 I EI 1 I 1

- - - i - _L-L -

0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power

  • 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 ____ 0.995 85.0 _____ 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 87 of 107 Page87 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-5c. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2-1.0 . . ..

0.8 -____

  • ( 0.6 . .

C,.

0.4 ... .

0.2 .. ..

0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power

  • 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 ___ __ 0.995 85.0 ___ _ 0.999 90.0 ___ __ 1.000 100.0 ___ __ 1.000 Page 88 of 107 Page88 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8,3-5d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.0 0.8

,.J S0.6 ...

0.4 .....

0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(%Rated) Fiow >50% FRow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 ____ 0.840

  • 50.0 0.897 70.0 ____ 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0O ____ 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 89 of 107 Page89 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report- Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8,3.6a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1,2

  • -Si - f I 1.0 "1.......

....,--.....4. ...-....-¢......I ....-. . . ..

0.8 I  ! i .

I I 0.4

/ <o~%

  • "i I _, iI

/ i t / I t i

/ *

- * - - i 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power {%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0,592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 _____ 0.820 85.0 ____ 0,869 90.0 1,000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 90 of 107 107LAR Rev. 0 Page90 o2O16-01

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-6b. OPERATING LIMfT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: .BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 -

1.0 -__

0.8 0.6 (zLI

-i C

0.4 0.2 .... . .

0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)

  • Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 0.820 85.0 0.869 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000.

Page 91 of 107 Page91 o20I6-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-6c.

  • OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
  • APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 m 1.0 _ _

0.8 ... . .

0.4 0.2 0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592

  • 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 ___ __ 0.738 70.0 0.818 85.0 ___ __ 0.869 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0
  • 1.000 Page §2 of 107 Page92 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-6d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE" GNF3 1.2 1.1 *---*----.-

1.0 ----. 4-0.9 ......1-...

0.8 0.7 ... __ 0"0 0.

C.,

0.3 i~~~

0.2 . ... ., -

0.1 --

00iny 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)

Power *; 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Fbow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 ____ 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 0.818 85.0 0.869 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 93 of 107 Page93 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-7a. OPERATING LIMfT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2-1.0 0.8 a.*

<*0.6 U.

C,

,-I 0.4 .. .

0.2 .....

0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power

  • 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.5 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 .820 O____

85.0 0.869 90.0 ____ 1.000 100.0 1.000 Page 94 of 107 Page94 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-7b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1.0 .... .f 0.8 - i 0.4 0.2 .. . .

00-q 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Fkow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 ____ 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 ____ 0.820 85.0 ____ 0.869 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 ____ 1.000 Page 95 of 107 Page95 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report- Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-7c. OPERATING LIMIT LKGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 7

  • EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2-1 1.0 C. I oI

< 0.6.. .

. 1 CDI

-a" 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power

  • 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 _____ 0.818 85.0 0.869 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 96 of 107 Page96 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-7d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 -

1.0 0.8 0

0.0 ~

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 0.818 85.0 0.869 90.0 1.000 100.0 ____ 1.000 Page 97 of 107 Page97 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 Figureg9.1-1: Monitored Region Boundary (Case 1) 120 110 100 90 80 70 GO 50 0.

40 uJ 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 30 90 100 110 CORE FLOW (%rated)

Page 98 of 107 Page98 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report- Cycle 19 Revision 2 Figure 9.1-2: Monitored Region Boundary (Case 2) 1ag .........-...... - -;. .... . . . .-....- - . ..-.-... -.# -*

I: i i 00 110 CORE FLOW (% rated)

Page 99 of 107 Page99 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 Figure 9.1-3: APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted Region Bounda*ry (Two Recirculatlon Loop Operation - Case 1) 120 r 51 r 1 T r 110 III I I I!I 100

.2- - - - - .- I .1 - L 90 80 i , Nomi~lValue

-t

  • 0 I s -

70 I - loalIle-80 7L .. * .. .. T. a _e... ..

a..

50 40 I " I RR 'TesricedlRe~gian 30 I Ii I I 20 I I I I i I I i I I I I I 10 I I I r I I l I I a i.-*--- o-****.-*1 0

0 10 20 30 40 SO 60 70 80 00 100 10 120 ALUGNED DRIVE FLOW (%rated)

Page 100 of 107 Pag 2016-01 Rev. 0 10of107LAR

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 Figure 9,t-4: APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpolnts and Restricted Region Boundary (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2) 1101* I) Ii , l

. ii , t ! *  ;,; ,

w SI  ! - - fcabeau

"' -. frctd"oi"i L.

0 0.L wi 0

,U~

_____  ! I___

x~z-r~i__ ,o-4 0 _10 .ito 5a 6#, 7 AUGNED DRiVE FLOW (%rated)

Page 101 of 107 Page 01 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 Figure 9.14; APRNM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted Region Boundary (Single Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1) a a I a 110 a a a a l 100-

- - II - -- -- - -- - - - - - - - - -

80-a a ... a .... , ,

N 70- t atI a a a -*

i a F a; al a aI eup c i a a I *R ~

esrct ii I uJ 0 I I -4 40 20.

.. ,.... . .... . . . ... ......4I--

. -... - - a a I i a Ia Il a a a

20. a aI aI I I a a

.. .. a* .. . . . . a .. a.t

. "Ja.. . . . aL... . a*1. . . a4.. . . a"i . . .. ai. . . . . . .

10 I i1 I . I I l I I ia

, I

  • I , I . I , I , I , t ,, L
  • I , I
  • V q I 60 90 100 110 120 0 10 20 30 49 60 00 70 ALIGNED DRIVE FLOW 4%rated)

Page 102 of 107 Pag 10 of107LAR 2016-01 Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 Figure 9.1-6: APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Selpoints and Restricted Region Boundary {Single Recircul.ation Loop Operation - Case 2)

I, i t _ _ I _ _

.h* I- ..

  • I - - -- -

AUIGNF*D DRIVi FLOW 1%tIe4*d Page 103 of 107 Page 03 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 Figure 9.1-7: APRNI Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1) 3 110 ...- . 4 3 I 3 3 100 90' 70 I

.1i I -

S! i! I 3 w

0 ." - I 3 I a- , / / , ' 1 - I 3 3 w

0

  • I i I r I U

i 3i I I 3 I 30* l I II I I I 3

, -, . I. . . . ' - _. _ . . 1 .

20 10-0 10 20 3o 40 90 60 70 80 81) tO0 110 120 ALIGNED DRIVE FLOW {% rated)

Page 104 of 107 Pag 2016-01 Rev. 0 10of107LAR

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 Figure 9.1-8: APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Dlock Setpoints (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2) itI L I

,I I  ! 1

, -- .*-.i:- -j " j ..

4/ 4 4 A,---

'- fi--i ..... -~--- ,-----t-1---h-t -

AL16NE] DRVE tFLOW L%

Page 105 of 107 Page 05 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 Figure 9.1-9: APRMI Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpolnts (Single Recirculatlon Loop Operaition - Case 1) lI I I i I I I r I I 110, I----I S4- - 4. 4 - 4 -- 4 I- -

I I I I I II I I I

  • II I I I I I I i I I I I i I I
10. l I I I I i i i I r I I- - - - - - - -U 90, I I Ii i i i I i i iI i I L

I 1i I

iI I i i i I I fl~

I  ! I

-__/_______i____i f I 0.

I I I i i I i I I I 0

0 I IIIIiI I 40 I i I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I 3O 1 I I I 20 10 0'

10 29 0o 41) 50 609 71 99 101) 110 1~0 ALIGNED DRIVE FLOW (% roted)

Page 106 of 107 Pag 2016-01 Rev, 0 10of107LAR

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 Figure 9.1-10: APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Singre Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2) t20 I.

I+/-h a

a-w 0

00 $~0 Ito 120 AtIGNWD DRIVE FLOW (5 rated)

Page 107 of 107 Page 07 o 107LAR2016-01 Rev. 0

,/ /J

~Entorgy Operations, Inc.

River Bend Station

-- 71.yLo 5485 U..Hgh" i wN-- St. Franojsville, LA 70775 "Tel225-381-4177 Joseph A. Clark Manager, Regulatory Assurance February 11,2016 RBG- 47648 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555

Subject:

Nineteenth Fuel Cycle Core Operating Limits Report, Revision 2 River Bend Station - Unit 1 Docket No. 50-458 License No. NPF-47

Dear Sir or Madam:

Enclosed is Revision 2 of the River Bend Station (RBS) Core Operation Limits Report (COLR) for the nineteenth fuel cycle. This report is submitted in accordance with Technical Specification 5.6.5 of Appendix A of the Facility Operating License NPF-47.

This letter does not contain any commitments.

For further information, plea* contact me at (225) 381-4177.

cc: Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV 1600 East Lamar Blvd.

Arlington, TX 76011-4511

RBG-47648 Page 2 of 2 NRC Senior Resident Inspector P. 0. Box 1050 St. Francisville, LA 70775 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Mr. Stephen S. Koenick MS 8 B1A One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MVD 20852 Department of Environmental Quality Office of Environmental Compliance Radiological Emergency Planning and Response Section Ji Young Wiley P.O. Box 4312 Baton Rouge, ILA 70821-4312 Public Utility Commission of Texas Attn: PUC Filing Clerk 1701 N. Congress Avenue P. 0. Box 13326 Austin, TX 78711-3326 RBFI 0015

Core Operating Limits Report Cycle 19 Revision 2

CrG Operatiwg Litmits e*

Revsion 2 Page 1 Of 107 Page1 of107LAR 20I6-01 Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 REVISION HISTORY Revision Description Original Issue Editorial change to: 1) Correct Figures 7,1-la through 7.1-7b to change the graph vertical axis label from MCPRp to MCPRF consistent with the figure title and input reference data, and correct the heading of the first column on the associated table located below each graph from Power (% Rated) to Flow (%Rated); 2) Correct Figures 8.2-1a through 8.2-7b to change the graph vertical axis label from LHGRFACp to LHGRFACF consistent with the figure title and input reference data. 3) Replaced duplicate Figure 8.2-4b on page 62 with the correct Figure 8.2-4a including vertical axis label correction described in item 2. 4) Added omitted figure number and first line of title to Figure 8.3-6b on page 91 and Figure 8.3-6c on page 92.

Editorial change to : update reference as needed to reflect updated licensing assessment after FO-16-01 to remove multiple fuel leakers. Fuel vendor updated licensing evaluation (COLR Ref.3.1.5) of reloaded core. EC62442 provides reload evaluation of changes made in FO 01, and demonstrated that BOC19 operating limits continue to apply to operation of RBS C19B core after FO-16-01.

Page 2 of 107 Page2 of107LAR 2016-01 Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report- Cycle 19 Revision 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PURPOSE ..................................................................................... 4 2.0 SCOPE......................................................................................... 4

3.0 REFERENCES

................................................................  ;................. 4 3.1 CURRENT CYCLE REFERENCES ......................................................................................... 4 3.2 METHODOLOGY REFERENCES ........................................................................................... 4 4.0 DEFINITIONS ................................................................................. 4 5.0 CORE DESIGN................................................................................ 7 5.1 REFERENCE CORE LOADING PATTERN ........................................................................ ,..........7 5.2 CONTROL RODS........................................................................................................... 7 6.0 AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (APLHGR)................. 7 7.0 MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPR)............................................. 7 7.1 FLOW-DEPENDENT MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPRF)VALUES: ........................................... 7 7.2 POWER-DEPENDENT MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPRp) VALUES: ......................................... 8 8.0 LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (LHGR).............................................. 8 8.1 EXPOSURE-DEPENDENT LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (LHGR) VALUES: .... ................................... 8 8.2 FLOW-DEPENDENT LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE FACTORS (LHGRFACF) VALUES:............................ 9 8.3 FLOW-DEPENDENT LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE FACTORS (LHGRFACF) VALUES ................ .9 9.0 STABILITY .................................................................................... 9 9.1 STABILITY REGION BOUNDARIES AND SETPOINTS...................... .... ;........................................... 10 9.2 APRM FLOW BIASED SIMULATED THERMAL POWER-HIGH TIME CONSTANT (SR 3,3.1.1t.14)................... 11 Page 3 of 107 Page3 of107LAR 2016-01 Rev.O0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 1.0 PURPOSE The COLR is controlled as a License Basis Document and revised accordingly for each fuel cycle or remaining portion of a fuel cycle. Any revisions to the COLR must be submitted to the NRC for information as required by Tech Spec 5.6.5 and tracked by RBS License Commitment LI11358.

'7 2.0 SCOPE As defined in Technical Specification 1.1, the COLR Is the document that provides the core operating limits for the current fuel cycle. This document is prepared in accordance with Technical Specification 5.6.5 for each reload cycle using NRC-approved analytical methods.

The limits included in this report are:

1) LCO 3.2.1, Average Planar Unear Heat Generation Rate (APLHGR),
2) LCO 3.2.2, Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPR), including power and flow dependent limits.
3) LCD 3.2.3, Linear Heat Generation Rate (LHGR), including power and flow dependent limits.
4) LCO 3.2.4, Fraction of Core Boiling Boundary (FCBB)
5) LCD 3.3.1.1, RPS Instrumentation (RPS), Function 2.b
6) LCD 3.3.1.3, Periodic Based Detection System (PBDS)

3.0 REFERENCES

This section contains the background, cycle-specific, and methodology references used in the current cycle reload analysis.

3.1 Current Cycle References 3.1.1 ECH-NE-14-00048 Revision 0, Supplemental Reload Licensing Report for River Bend Station -

Unit I with GNF3 - Unit t Reload 18 Cycle 19.

3.1.2 ECH-NE-1 4-00049 Revision 0, Fuel Bundle Information Report for River Bend Station - Unit 1 Reload 18 Cycle 19.

3.1.3 Letter, R. E. Kingston to G. W. Scronce, ='Time Constant Values for Simulated Thermal Power Monitor", RBC-46410, November 30, 1995.

3.1.4 RBS Updated Safety Analysis Report 3.1.5 ECH-NE-15-00004, Revision 2, "RBS C19 GESTAR Assessment" 3.2 Methodology References The Technical Specifications (TS) supported by each methodology reference are provided In brackets.

The following are applicable to GNF supplied fuel.

3.2.1 NEDE-2401 1-P-A, General Electric Standard Application for Reactor Fuel (GESTAR-Il).

4.0 DEFINITIONS Page 4 of 107 Page4 of107LAR 2016-0l Rev. 0

  • River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 4.1 Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (APLHGR) - the APLHGR shall be applicable to a specific planar height and is equal to the sum of the linear heat generation rates for all the fuel rods in the specified bundle at the specified height divided by the number of fuel rods in the fuel bundle.

4.2 Average Planar Exposure - the Average Planar Exposure shall be applicable to a specific planar height and is equal to the sum of the exposure of all the fuel rods in the specified bundle at the specified height divided by the number of fuel rods in the fuel bundle.

4.3 Critical Power Ratio (CPR) - the ratio of that power in the assembly, which is calculated by application of the fuel vendor's appropriate boiling correlation, to cause some point in the assembly to experience boiling transition, divided by the actual assembly operating power.

4.4 Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) - The River Bend Station specific document that provides core operating limits for the current reload cycle in accordance with Technical Specification 5.6.5.

4.5 Linear Heat Generation Rate (LHGR) - the LHGR shall be the heat generation per unit length of fuel rod. It is the integral of the heat flux over the heat transfer area associated with the unit length.

4.6 Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPR) - the MCPR shall be the smallest CPR which exists in the core.

4.7 MCPR Safety Limit - the minimum value of the CPR at which the fuel could be operated with the expected number of rods in boiling transition not exceeding 0.1% of the fuel rods in the core.

4.8 Aligned Drive Flow - Adjusted FCTR card input drive flow signal that accounts for actual variations in the core flow to drive flow relationship.

4.9 Monitored Region - The area of the core power and flow operating domain where the reactor may be susceptible to reactor instabilities under conditions exceeding the licensing basis of the current reactor system.

4.10 Restricted Region - The area of the core power and flow operating domain where the reactor is susceptible to reactor instabilities in the absence of restrictions on core void distributions.

4.11 Setpoint "Setup" - A FCTR card feature that sets the normal "non-setup" EIA APRM flow-biased scram and control rod block trip reference setpoints associated with the Exclusion and Restricted Regions higher to permit required reactor maneuvering in the Restricted Region when stability controls are in effect.

4.12 EOR - the cycle exposure corresponding to all rods out, 100% power/100% flow, and normal feedwater temperature.

4.13 MOC - Middle of Cycle (EOR- 2,794 MWdlMTU) [Reference 3.1.1, page 19].

4.14 EOC - End of Cycle (Core Exposure 35,094 MWd/MTU) [Reference 3.1.1. page 6].

4.15 FFWVTR - Final Feedwater Temperature Reduction.

4.16 FHOOS - Feedwater Heater Out of Service.

4.17 PROOS - Pressure Regulator Out of Service.

4.18 SLO - Single Loop Operation.

Page 5 of 107 PageSf 2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 4.19 TBOOS -Turbine Bypass Out of Service 4.20 AREVA -AREVA NP Inc.

4.21 GNF - Global Nuclear Fuel 4.22 EOC-RPT - End of Cycde Recirculation Pump Trip 4.23 Reference Core Loading Pattern - The Core Loading Pattern Used for Reload Licensing Analysis.

4.24 Application Condition - The combination of equipment out of service conditions for which LHGRFAC and MCPR limits are determined (Reference 3.1.1, page 38]. The Application Conditions are as follows:

I Application FWHOOS I EOC-RPT PROOS TBOOS Condition FFWTR OOS ___ _________

1 x 2 X X 3 X X 4 X X 5 X X X 6 X _ _ _X X 7 X X X X All application conditions address the licensed core flow.

Page 6 of 107 Page6 of107LAR 2016-01 Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 5.0 CORE DESIGN 5.1 Reference Core Loading Pattern The original Reference Core Loading pattern is presented in Reference 3.1.1.

During the core shuffle a fuel failure was identified. This bundle was scheduled to be shuffled, but because of the failure was discharged and replaced with a similar bundle that was scheduled for discharge. The revised core loading was evaluated in Reference 3.1.5 with the determination that the reload evaluation results were applicable to the revised core.

5.2 Control Rods The River Bend core utilizes the GE design control rods, non GE design CR-82M and CR-82M-1 bottom entry cruciform control rods. These control rod designs are discussed in more detail in Reference 3.1.4, Sections 4.1 and 4.2.

6.0 AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (APLHGR)

Per Technical Specification 3.2.1, all APLHGR values shall not exceed the exposure-dependent limits reported as follows:

Fuel Type Figure GNF2 6.1-la GNF3 6.1-lb For single loop operation (SLO) a multiplier of 0.83 [Reference 3.1.1, page 58] is applied to the APLH-GR limits for all fuel types.

7.0 MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPR)

Per Technical. Specification 3.2.2, the MCPR values shall be equal to or greater than the operating limit.

The operating limit is the maximum of the flow-dependent minimum critical power ratio (MCPRF) and the power-dependent minimum critical power ratio (MCPRp).

MCPRF and MCPRp limits are provided in Sections 7.1 and 7.2 below. These limits address the different fuel types, exposure ranges and application conditions.

For single recirculation loop operation (SLO), the MCPR limit is increased by 0.02 [Reference 3.1.1, page 34] to address the difference in the safety limit MCPR reported in Technical Specification 2.1.1.2.

7.1 Flow-Dependent Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPRF) Values:

The MCPRF curves are from Reference 3.1.1, Appendix D as augmented by Reference 3.1.1, Appendix F and are found in the following figures:

Application gue Condition GNF2 GNF3 I7.1-la 7.1-lb Page 7 of 107 Page7 of107LAR 2016-01 Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 Application Figures Condition GNF2 GNF3 2 7.1-2a 7.1-3b 3 7.1-3a 7.1-3b 4 7.1-4a 7.1-4b 5 7.1-5a 7.1-5b 6 7.1-6a 7.1-6b 7 1.1-la 7.1-lb 7.2 Power-Dependent Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPRp) Values:

The MCPRp curves are from Reference 3.1.1, Appendix D as augmented by Reference 3.1.1, Appendix F and are found in the following figures:

Figure (

Application BOG - MOC MOC - EOC Condition GNF2 GNF3 GNF2 GNF3 1 7.2-la 7.2-lb 7.2-Ic 7.2-Id 2 7.2o2a 7.2-2b 7.2-2c 7.2-2d 3 7.2-3a 7.2-3b 7.2-3c 7.2-3d 4 7.2-4a 7.2-4b 7.2-4c 7,2-4d 5 7.2-5a 7.2-Sb 7.2-Sc 7.2-Sd 6 7.2-6ia 7.2-6b 7.2-6c 7.2-6d 7 7.2-la 7.2-lb 7.2-7c 7.2-7d More limiting operating values mode. For of the power example EOCdependent values maylimits may instead be used be usedofinthe lieuMOO of those indicated by a particular values.

8.0 LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (LHGR)

Per Technical Specification 3.2.3, the LHGR values for any rod at any axial location shall not exceed the exposure-dependent limits multiplied by the smaller of either the power-dependent or flow-dependent LHGR factors.

For single loop operation (SLO) a multiplier of 0.83 [Reference 3.1.1, page 551 is applied to the LHGR limits for all fuel types.

For two recirculation loop and single recirculation loop operation the LHGR multiplier is as follows:

For two recirculation loop operation:

LHGRFAC = MIN(LHGRFACp, LHGRFACF)

For single loop operation:

LHGRFAC = MIN(LHGRFACp, LHGRFACF, 0.83) 8.1 Exposure-Dependent Linear Heat Generation Rate (LHGR) Values:

Page 8 of 107 2O16-01 Rev. 0 Page8 of107LAR

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 GNF2 and GNF3 exposure-dependent LHGR values are considered GNF proprietary and will not be conitained in the COLR. The GNF2 LHGR values may be found in Reference 3.1.2, page 3. Per Reference 3.1.1, Appendix F the GNF2 exposure dependent LHGR values may be applied to the GNF3 fuel.

8.2 Flow-Dependent Linear Heat Generation Rate Factors (LHGRFACF) Values:

The LHGRFACF curves are from Reference 3.1.1, Appendix D as augmented by Reference 3.1.1, Appendix F and are found in the following figures:"

Application Figures Condition GNF2 GNF3 1 8.2-la 8.2-lb 2 8.2-2a 8.2-2b 3 8.2-3a 8.2-3b 4 8.2-4a 8.2-4b 5 8.2-5a 8.2-5b 6 8.2-6a 8.2-6b 7 8.2-7a 8.2-7b 8.3 Power-Dependent Linear Heat Generation Rate Factors (LHGRFACp) Values:

The LHGRFACp curves are from Reference 3.1.1, Appendix D as au~gmented by Reference 3.1.1, Appendix F and are found in the following figures:

Figure Application BOG - MOC MOC - EOC Conditions GNF2 GNF3 GNF2 GNF3 18.3-la 8.3-lb 8.3-1c 8.3-1d 2 8.3-2a 8.3-2b 8.3-2c 8.3-2d 3 8.3-3a 8.3-3b 8.3-3c 8.3-3d 4 8.3-4a 8.3-4b 8.3-4c 8.3-4d 5 8.3-5a 8.3-4b 8.3-5c 8.3-5d 6 8.3-6a 8.3-4b 8.3-6c 8.3-6d 7 8,3-7a 8.3-4b 8.3-7c 8.3-7d More limiting values of the power dependent multipliers may be used in lieu of those indicated by a particular operating mode. For example EOC values may be used instead of the MOC values.

9.0 STABILITY The following Technical Specifications I Technical Requirements contain stability related requirements:

  • TS 3.2.4, Fraction of Core Boiling Boundary (FOB B)
  • "IS 3.3.1.1, RPS Instrumentation (RPS)
  • TIS 3.3.1.3, Periodic Based Detection System (PBDS)

Page 9 of 107 2016-01 Rev. 0 Page9 of107LAR

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 STR 3.3.2.1, Control Rod Block Instrumentation 9.1 Stability Region Boundaries and Setpoints This section contains region boundaries, setpoints and other stability related requirements. The stability region boundaries and setpoints are as follows Description Figure Monitored Region Boundary (Case 1) 9.1-1 Monitored Region Boundary (Case 2) 9.1-2 APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted 9.1-3 Region Boundary (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1)______

APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted 9.1-4 Region Boundary (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2) _____

APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted 9.1-5 Region Boundary (Single Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1)______

APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted 9.1-6.

Region Boundary (Single Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2)

APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Two Recirculation Loop 9.1-7 Operation - Case 1) ______

APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Two Recirculation Loop 9.1-8 Operation - Case 2)

APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux*- High Rod-Block Setpoints (Single Recirculation 9.1-'9 Loop Operation - Case 1)

APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Single Recirculation 9.1-10 Loop Operation - Case 2) _____

Note: For Figures 9.1-3 to 9.1-10, the Nominal Setpoints should be used for indicating the entry into a particular stability region as allowed and appropriate actions be taken prior to the entry In the table above, two distinct operating states (Case 1 and Case 2) are considered. These are descri bed as follows:

Case I - Normal Feedwater Heatingq Operation or Low Reactor Power :

TFW (at rated) Ž T~v*SIGN (at rated) - 5Q0 F, and rated equivalent at off-rated reactor conditions OR P<~30%

Case 2 - Reduced Feedwater Heating Operation:

TFW (at rated) < T*-s'GN (at rated) - 500 F AND P >30%

Page 10 of 107 Page10 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision ,2 The APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High scram setpoint and Rest'icted Region Boundary, and APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints are given interms of aligned drive flow. The aligned drive flow is calculated from the input drive flow using the following relationship:

101.209 x A40 - 31.028 x A100 + 70.181 x W we 70.181 - (Ab°° - A0 Where: W5 = FCTR card input drive flow in percent rated, WD = Aligned drive flow in percent rated, A4° Low flow drive flow alignment setting, and A1°= High flow drive flow alignment setting.

9.2 APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power-High Time Constant (SR 3.3.1.1,14)

The simulated thermal power time constant is 6 +/- 0.6 seconds (Reference 3.1.3). Thus the maximum simulated thermal power time constant for use in meeting the surveillance requirement is 6.6 seconds.

Page 11 of 107 107LARRev. 0 Page11 o2016-01

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 6.1-la. MAXIMUM AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (MAPLHGR) VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE FUEL TYPE: GNF2 15 14 13 12 11 10 09 8 7

,-J

..J 6

5 4

3 2

0 20 40 60 80 Average Planar Exposure (GWD/M TU)

Average Planar MAPLHGR Limit Exposure (kW/ft) 0.00 13.78 19.31 13.78 67.00 7.50 70.00 6.69 Page 12 of 107 Page12 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 6.1-lb. MAXIMUM AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (MAPLHGR) VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE FUEL TYPE: GNF3 15 14 13 12 11 10 9

8 C, 7 6

5 4

3 2

1 0

0 20 40 60 80 Average Planar Exposure (GWD/MTU)

Average Planar MAPLHGR Limit 0.00ur 13.78t Ex.s0r 13.78t 19.31 13.78 67.00 7.50 70.00 6.69

.Page 13 of 107 Page13 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.1-1a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE FLOW (MCPRF)

APPLICATION CONDITON:t FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.5 -

1.4 1.3 .. .

n 1.2 1.1 ... . -

1.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow j Loop

(%Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.26 1.34 30.0 1.26 1.34 50.0 1.20 1.27 72.0 1.20 1.20 100.0 1.20 1.20 109.5 1.20 1.20 Page 14 of 107 Page14 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.1-lb. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)

APPLICATION CONDFTION:

FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.5-1.4 1.3

" -- L-oop" 1.2 1.1 1.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow I Loop

(%Rated) Manual Loop~ Auto 20.0 1.26 1.34 30.0 1.26 1.34 50.0 1.20 1.27 72,0 1.20 1.20 100.0 1.20 1.20 109.5 1.20 1.20 Page 15 of 107 2016-01 Rev.O0 Pagel~of107LAR

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.1-2a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.5-1.3

-- !.oop*

1.2 1.1 1.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow I Loop

(%Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.26 1.34 30.0 1.26 1.34 50.0 1.20 1.27 72.0 1.20 1.20 100.0 1.20 1.20 109.5 1.20 1.20 Page 16 of 107 Page16 o2O16-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Revision 2 Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 FIGURE 7.1-2b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)

APPLICATION CON~mON: 2 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.5 -

1.4 . .. i 1.3 1.23 -_

1.1 1.0 -

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 60 90 100 110 Flow, (%Rated)

Flow I Loop

(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.26 1.34 30.0 1.26 1.34 50.0 1.20 1.27 72.0 1.20 1.20 100.0 1.20 1.20 109.5 1.20 1.20 Page 17 of 107 Page17 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report Revision 2

- Cycle 19 FIGURE 7.1-3a, OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 FUEL TYPE: GN F2 1.5-1.4 1.3-1.2 1.1 . . . .

1.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)

Flow I Loop

(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.26 1.34 30.0 1.26 1.34 50.0 1.20 1.27 72.0 1.20 1.20 100.0 1.20 1.20 109.5 1.20 1.20 Page 18 of 107 Page18 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.1-3b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.5 -

1.4 .. . ..

1.3 . ..

LI C

C

--- I 1.1 1.0 .q 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow I Loop

(%Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.26 1.34 30.0 1.26 1.34 50.0 1.20 1.27 72.0 1.20 1.20 100.0 1.20 1.20 109.5 1.20 1.20 Page 19 of 107 Page19 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report- Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.1-4a, OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.4 .. . ---

--- oop-*Aar a.

U 1.2 1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)

Flow I Loop

(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 1:33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page 20 of 107 Page20 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7,1-4b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.4

.... . . .p ....

1.3-1 U-0o 1.2 1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow l Loop

(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page 21 of 107 Page21 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.1-5a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)

APPUCATION CONDITION: 5 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.5-L-oF 1.4 1.3 -

1.2 . .. ....

1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)

Flow I Loop

(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page 22 of 107 Page22 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.1-5b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.4 _L. ia C.,

1.2 1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)

Flow I Loop

(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page 23 of 107 Page23 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.1 -6a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.5 . - . m I I l I

... -s-----L- * ' . I-----... ------

  • 1...

1.4

.. . .. .I- - .. .* * .- - -* * ... . . . 4 ...  : . . . . .. . .t- -- ...t.... ... .

1.3

" , , il *I F--.. "*

0. . .. . . . ..I. . . .

(3 1.2 I I 1 II

!. ... m r .. .. ,4. .- . .. - . .. ,- * - 9....,---

1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 .60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)

Flow I Loop

(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page 24 of 107 Page24 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGUR~E 7.1-6b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRr)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.5 ,

! i I I I i

--_ L_ o.D.A~utD . .. - - i . ..... t.... .J .....  ! . .. .. . ._ . ... .L .. .

- - --* .... ... - - -* -..... . ..4 -- -- - - - -.. 4. ... . . . .

1.4 ---- oo4au --- .. .- . . . .- ...--*~ --- 1---E . .---------*-i-- - -. .. . .

--- - ".. -.. . -t---. -- . .. . -- -.. . .I--- = . . . . .I . . .. {. . . . . .

1.3 S " I I I

.,)

. . .... 1-..... 1 S I I I ____ I ____ll I ___

1.2 i 1i I !ii

.. . .m . -y. . . . P. . . " * . . .* '- - * . . . - - - . . t - - - -

1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

FlowlI Loop

(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page 25 of 107 Page25 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.1-7a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow' (MC PRF)

APPLICATION CONDITON: 7 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.5-

__ L__.

1.4

--- Loop 1.3 L

C C

C 1.2 1.1 1.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow I Loop

(%Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page 26 of 107 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0 Page26

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.1-7b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.5 Lo 1.4 1.3 -

C

(

1.2 . .

1.1 --: .. i 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow I Loop

(%Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 1.33 1.36 100.0 .1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page 27 of 107 Page27 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-1a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRP)

APPLICATION CONDITION:

EXPOSURE RANGE: BOG TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 ... ... .. -. . - .. .. - *......- .. .. * .... . - ..... .... n -... . .S .

-- , *.. . --- - i -..... ..... ' - .- -- I-- -

2.8 2.6

  • i !i 1 2.4 2.2 . .... * -,--- - --p --- --' 4..... .. ... ... . .i+ .- . ..-- . . .

i . . . 2 ..

  • --* ... . , ..... i :----- r- -- - - . .* -. . . . . - - - - -. .
a. 2.0 U

*.o%*o,-w--%T~~~~...

i --.... ........ ....... .....*.....T.....r-....I-- ..

1.8 .. . . . . . - .* . . . . . . .I _. . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . _. . .*. . .

. . .- -.. . . . _ - 2_

.. . . . .v ..- -.. - i .. .L . . .

, I  ! i - i  !,

1.6 1.4 2  ! i I2 ' i ._

-. . q ,r.. . - ... . . .. .. i-. .. ....- ,- - - r-- ... - ..

1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 . 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Fbw >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10

'40.0 1.59 50.0 1.59 70.0 1.59 85.0 1.44 85.0 _____ 1.44 90.0 _____ 1.39 100.0 _____ 1.35 Page 28 of 107 Page28 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-lb. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8 2.6 i S

.r t

flf,rl .. ... fi

-'.-- t . . .

... . ,- -. . .. r t

2A I~*oJ,* "--l i .-- 1----. ( I 2.2 a.

a. 2.0

'3 I I ~ i -/ '

1.8 ... ....... . . . . ..---- .. . . .t. . . . .. - t . . . , - - ,5-- - - , . ..

1.6 z t :i".~ 'o 1 * -*,it --- I- - j .- i V -

-... I -... ....- -* -..... --... T--- ". .. - "- - -...

1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power

  • 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40.0 1.64 50.0 1.64 70.0 1.64 85.0 _____ 1.49 85.0 1.49 90.0 1.44 100.0 _____ 1.40 Page 29 of 107 Page29 o 107LAR2016-01 Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-10 OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: I EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 2.8

!*  !  !-i -- .

2.6 I I , 1 I i I

- ' I 2.4 i 1 i--i---,

2.2 n.2.0

..... **o~o%

  • -1------- ------ r.-.....--- I..

. .. . . .... . .r,....*- - -

U i . ....t" "

1.8 iII 1 1.6 I

t. __..

I

_ .. ... - .. . . . . . - -r-. . . . . .

1.4 ......

.L. ........

...i 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 _____ 1.63 50.0 _____ 1.63 70.0 _____ 1.59 85.0 1.48 85.0 1.48 90.0 _____ 1.44 100.0 _____ 1.41 Page 30*107 Page30 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-Id. OPERATING LUMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 2.8

  • 2.6 -......

2.2 -**

a.2.0 1.8 .. .

1.6 12 -.

1.0-0 10 .20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow 1>50% Flow 23.8 2.23 1 2.58 40.0 2.03 I 2,15 I 40.0 _____ 1.68 50.0 _____ 1.68 70.0 _____ 1.64 85.0 1.53 85.0 1.53 90.0 1.49 100.0 _____ 1.46 Page 31 of 107 Page31 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-2a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 2.8 2.6 .. . ....--

2.2 ... .. . ...

". 2.0-1.8 1.6 ..........

1.2 . . .. {. .

10 -p-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power _<50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40.0 1.59 50.0 1.59 70.0 _____ 1.59 85.0 1.46 85.0 __ _ 1.46 90.0 _____ 1.42 100.0 _____ 1.39 Page 32 of 107 Page32 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-2b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MC PRp)

APPLICATION CONDfITON: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 -

2.6 2.4 ........ I-50 2.2i 1.8 ... . . - -

1.6 1.4 -

1.0 m 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power -<50.0%

(% Rated) Row >50% Fkow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40.0 _____ 1.64 50.0 1.64 70.0 1.64 85.0 1.51 85.0 1.51 90.0 1.47 100.0 _____ 1.44 Page 33 of 107 Page33 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-2c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 - .S *- *- *S *- *- .- I- * - S-

... . . . .F . . . . .!. . .*i.. . i. . . . .. . .- t. . . . . . .

2.8 i I !I I'Il  ! I _ _ _ _

2.6

.. .. >5.0%_FIL. ._..* ._ _ .. . .. . *__ _ ._ I _ _ _'_ _

......... I........... T..... ~...1 ... . .

2.2 --- q--- -- C ... i . .T---T---1.* -- -T ... -'-

I I I 0.

0o 2.0 _______ I I_______

- I I I I 1.8 *.. . .I-. . ,. .-. .. -.. ....--:--*..] .. . - -...- .. . -. . I-- --

1.6 1.4

- . - . * .. .. J.. . i...

1.2 m -i....... ..I ".

,'.m..-....* .... . .. - .. .. ..... , . -. . .. - ..

1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power S 50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 1.63 50.0 _____ 1.63 70.0 1.59 85.0 1.51 85.0 1.51 90.0 _____ 1.48 100.0 _____ 1.44 Page34of107 Page34 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-2d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0

- I - - U - - I 2.8

..... 50% e*--1---i i -. i 2.6 1 I1 , i i i 1 2.4

  • 7/o . .. ... 7--......... 7.......

2.2 - - * - - - -TI . . . . .. ..'t. . . . ..-. . .. .T . . ..--. . . -. .

.. .... . ,-- . .. .. .. ... . . .. .. I. .

... . - - -i .. . I. . . .L. . . .* . . .

a. 2.0

.. . . . . I .. .. .... --.--- ----- -.-i .. . ...

1.8

-- . - *..* . . .. . .. . -4 . . - ----

. i.. .... 1 . . .. . ..

. .. ...,. . . . .. ... .. ... ..I.. . . . . .* . . . I - - - t . . . .t . . . . .t. . . .

1.6

....... .. .....1 . i.1... .......... i 17.. . . . 17 F--.........- ......... Z.. . I -f....... ... ..- -

1.4

  • ..... . ... +/- . ....z _ _ .. . _. -.- I___ .. *. ..

1.2 -.. r -....-- - .... 4- - -k . . . . .... ...... -... . .... - . -. ..

1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1(00 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40.0 _____ 1.68 50.0 _____ 1.68 70.0 1.64 85.0 _____ 1.56 85.0 _____ 1.56 90.0 1.53 100.0 _____ 1.49 Page 35 of 107 Page35 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-3a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 2.8 2.6-2.4 2.2 -

1.6 ..- . .. ..

1.4 -

1.2 1.0 - i 0 10 20 30 40 50 60

  • 70 80 90 ,100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power s 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40.0 _____ 2.09 50.0 _____ 1.95 70.0 _____ 1.75 85.0 __ _ 1.64 85.0 __ _ 1.42 90.0 _____ 1.39 100.0 __ _ 1.35 Page 36 of 107 Page36 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-3b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8 .. ...

2 .6 ...........

2.4 .. .. .

=. 2.0 .. .

1.8 - --.

1.6 -- *........

1.4 .... A 1.2 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40.0 2.14 50.0 2.00 70.0 _____ 1.80 85.0 1.69 85.0 1.47 90.0 _____ 1.44 100.0 _____ 1.40 Page 37 of 107 Page37 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-3c, OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0

! t I i _ _ I _ _

2.8 2.6 F -- -- ".-..-,--'-.- .-.-. I  ; I 2.4 J -I ,1  ! t I  !

I  ! " , i I I, 2.2 2.0 ..*". .O F-I,- 4.. "j.. .. . . . . ..-- ... - -- - . .. r -. .

. .. .. -------- . ---.- *.. . . ' --- - -- -- -- -- --- -L -

1.8

.... ] i -.-- _ * -*.- .i..--

,- .. , .. I. ....F . .

1.6 .. .. - i. _* .. . -*_

1.4 k- -..

1.....-

I ..

  • r. .

. . .t - - *

- ... -.. =..

1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >60% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 2.09 50.0 1.99 70.0 __ __ 1.80 85.0 _____ 1.70 85.0 _____ 1.47 90.0 _____ 1.44 100.0 _____ 1.41 Page 38 of 107 Page38 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-3d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 -

2.6 ....

2.4 ..... __

2.2 *

o. 2.0 -- I o

1.8 -- 4 1.6 ....... .

1.4 -. . .i 1.2 .. . .

1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 10 1}3 10 Power (% Rated)

Power s 50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40.0 2.14 50.0 2.04 70.0 _____ 1.85 85.0 _____ 1.75 85.0 1.52 90.0 _____ 1.49 100.0 _____ 1.46 Page 39 of 107 Page39 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-4a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOG TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 .-

2.8 ... ...

2 .6 .........

- 1 2.4 .. .....

2.2 .. . -

,', 2.0 1.8 - .

1.6

  • 1.4 1.0-0 10.20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1030 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40.0 1.64 50.0 _____ 1.59 70.0 1.59 85.0 1.46 85.0 1.46 90.0 1.41 100.0 _____ 1.37 Page 40 of 107 Page40 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operatin~g Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-4b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRP)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 2.8 2.6 . ......-

2.2 2.0 -- <

Ui 1.8 1.6 1.4 . .

  • 1.2 -

1.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power s 50.0%

(%Rated) FRow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40.0 1.69 50.0 1.64 70.0 1.64 85.0 1.51 85.0 1.51 90.0 1.46 100.0 ____ 1.42 Page 41 of 107 Page41 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-4c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 -

2.8 2.6 .....

2.4 2.2 .. *-

n. 2.0 0

1.8 .. . .

1.6 . . ....

1.4 1.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Rlow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 1.66 50.0 _____ 1.65 70.0 _____ 1.61 85.0 ____ 1.51 85.0 1.51 90.0 ____ 1.47 100.0 _____ 1.43 Page 42 of 107 Page42 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-4d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8

>5%Iow i I I ___

2.6 i I I 2.4

.. . ,.. . ---- --- . ---- . ... I. . .--. . . .. . --

22

' Jiii I I a.2.0 1.8

. . . .. . " - z.

1--'--i

-_ __ . . . . . J*U.....

. . .EI... mm..... ... m. . .

.... m.

i ImE ... 'I 1.6 0 .. 10 20.... 30.. 40--- .... 60 70.-- 80. . 90. 100.. 110..

1.4 1.2 1.0 Power (% Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Row 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40.0 1.71 50.0 1.70 70.0 _____ 1.66 85.0 _____ 1.56 85.0 _____ 1.56 90.0 _____ 1.52" 100.0 _____ 1.48 Page 43 of 107 Page43 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-5a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS GORE POWER, (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDmTON: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOG TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0

- . m....",...

..... -r . ..... ....-.

S.. ..

2.8

- .~ .........4......... 4-I.. .. ,....... ,.........*..... ..r . . .

- .1-------.1.. , I 2.6

- i 1*/ -

2.4 -- ~5~L IO. .- -! i i i 2.2

.. .. . -i1.. I --i--- - ....-

A.

o. 2.0 - -- - - __

1.8 1.6 1.4

- - I __ I II 1.2 -- .. -'.. ... * - 4 L_. .. -... d -..... ... . ..

1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40.0 1.64 50.0 _____ 1.59 70.0 1.59 85.0 _____ 1.49 85.0 _____ 1.49 90.0 _____ 1.45 100.0 _____ 1.41 Page44of107 Page44 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-5b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CON DITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8 --- j...

2.6 .. .. i.*

2.4 22---<---*

a.. 2.0 - -- ..

1.6 -1 1.4 .... 2.~.....

1.2 --

1.0 -I 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flew 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40.0 _____ 1.69 50.0 _____ 1.64 70.0 1.64 85.0 _____ 1.54 85.0 _____ 1.54 90.0 _____ 1.50 100.0 _____ 1.46 Page 45 of 107 Page45 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-5c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 2.8~- 4 2.6 2.4 2.2 ---- rw

0. 2.0 UJ 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 1.66 50.0 1.65 70.0 1.61 85.0 1.54 85.0 1.54 90.0 1.51 100.0 ____ 1.46 Page 46 of 107 Page46 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-5d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3,0 2.8 ... .* -

2.6 .....

  • 0 2 .4 ........- ....

2.2 ......

  • o0
a. 2.0 1.8 . . .- ..

1.6 1.4 .. . ..*. .

1.2 - .

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power

  • 50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40.0 1.71 50.0 1.70 70.0 1.66 85.0 1.59 85.0 1.59 9O.0 1.56 100.0 _____ 1.51 Page 47 of 107 Page47 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-6a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 2.8 a..

. . a-... .

SI

- j

_ _ t . .. a.. -

2.6

-- ..... ----.-- r-- t--1i--....!.. . -p- -----

I I _ _ _ I i _ _ _

2.4 * -I,... . - .. . T I "----v----- -I -- 'r' *

- .I --

2.2 ... . . . . .. .. . . ... . . .. . . .

1. . . . . .' .I . I.. L . ... .. ..... . .. . . * . . . . .t . . . .. . . . . . . .
a. 2.0 1.8
  • -*~w

--- *

  • LZ_..... .* -- -- .... ... !.....1 * -

1.6

  • .- -- i *....- .--* ... . *,:--- ** - .--- r. .... -. .

1.4 a...- .. . ....a 4 - - - . . ...- -- a..=--- - --.... 9-__

0 1 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 10 1 1,2

... Powe --- %Ra-te.....d) 1.0 Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40.0 2.09 50.0 _____ 1.95 70.0 ___ _ '1.75 85.0 _____ 1.64 85.0 1.44 90.0 1.41 100.0 _____ 1.37 Page 48 of 107 Page48 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-Sb. OPERATING UMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8 ..... ...

2.6 2.4 . . .

o 2 14 --4J 1.2 --

  • 1.0 -q 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 "110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40.0 2.14 50.0 2.00 70.0 1.80 85.0 1.69 85.0 1.49 90.0 1.46 100.0 _____ 1.42 Page 49 of 107 Page49 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-6c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPIp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 2.8 ... .

2.6 .... . ..

2.2 5 o2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 . . . .

1.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Fbow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 2.09 50.0 1.99 70.0O ____ 1.80 85.0 _____ 1.70 85.0 _____ 1.51

  • 90.0 _____ 1.47 100.0 1.43 Page 50 of 107 Page50 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-6d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: / MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0

__t t j ___

2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2

-- - - *-..... - .. . -* ' -- ... . .*.. . . .. . . * .- .__ .t. . . . ..- . . ...

a.. 2.0 1.8 - .. . .. . . . .. .- ..... .-.-i . - - . .

1.6 1A I i 1 i i 1.2

- ......-  ! .. ... Y- . .. - ... - ---- F----- . ...

1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40.0 2.14 50.0 2.04 70,0 _____ 1.85 85.0 _____ 1.75 85.0 1.56 90.0 _____ 1.52 100.0 _____ 1.48 Page 51 0f107 Page51 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-7a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDfITON: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 o.2.0 1.8, 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power <50.0%

_(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40.0 2.09 50.0 1.95 70.0 1.75 85.0 1.64 85.0 1.47 90.0 1.45 100.0 _____ 1.41 Page 52 of 107 Page52 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7,2-7b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRP)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOG TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8 .. ....

].. .. ."-......

  • Lr- --iz--- '- -.... .. '- ---I

...----- I _ _

  • 1 I 2.6 ,>5O%Fl~ OW I i~

-- --V---4--------*- .... ---l-......---4---........-----4-*-----= -.. ... . r--

2,4 I ** 1 II 2.2

< o ----- I I 2.0

  • i------

-- -- . ... _ .----, __*. ,= __ , . _ .L . ..... .....i . L______

C.,

. ._

  • _ .... _* I_*__

1.8 I .I F r . J I I !I ,

1.6 I ii  ! i 1.4 I

1.2 . . .__.

  • _.._ _ 1 __ * -

z --2.... -.--. . .-- - -.. . .4. ....--. . . -. . .. ..

1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90' 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power

  • 50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40.0 2.14 50.0 2.00 70.0 _____ 1.80 85.0 _____ 1.59 85.0 _____ 1.52

'90.0 _____ 1.50 100.0 _____ 1.46 Page 53of107 Page53 o2016-01107LARRev.O0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19

  • Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-7c* OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0

- -.... * --- i- --- ... *- ---- I -..... ---..

2.8

_ _ _. . . . . .. . .. .. . .. _i_ . . ... L . .. . .

2.6 2.4 I I I I -=--t--i

~ I f I 2.2 a.2.0

. I i I 1.8

  • .------, .Ib* - - * -F - -  :- * - . . ...

1.6 -, - - - 4, 4 r 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Rcw >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 2.09 50.0 1.99 70.0 1.80 85.0 1.70 85.0 1.54 90.0 1.51 100.0 ____ 1.46 Page 54 of 107 Page54 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 7.2-7d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)

APPLICATION COND!TION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0

  • 2.8 --

2.6 ..... :50 2.4 .. . . . .

2.2 .. .oo o.. 2.0 .. - . ..

Ui 1.8 ' -,'..

I -

106 -........-...

0 ~ 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power <_50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40.0 _____ 2.14 50.0 2.04 70.0 _____ 1.85 85.0 1.75 85.0 1.59 90.0 1.56 100.0 _____ 1.51 Page 55 of 107 Page55 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGU RE 8.2-la. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 -

1.0 -* ~~~

0.8 -4

-- Loopi

~0.6 *-

0.4 - -

0.2 ...... -

0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0,919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 56 of 107 Page56 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.2-lb. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1.0 - _ _ _

0.8

~~1 S0.2 00 -I 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 57 of 107 107LARRev. 0 Page57 o2016-01

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.2-2a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 -

1.0 0 .8 . ..

- ~ Loopj

.0.4 . . .

0.2 ----- o*-

004 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 58 of 107 Page55 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report- Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.2-2b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flaw (LHGRFACF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 . m 1.0 ..

0.8 .. . .

--* Loop )

-j-0.4 0.2 .. . .

0,0 ,

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 59 of 107 Page59 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19

  • Revision 2 FIGURE 8.2-3a, OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 -

1.0 -i 0.8

-- Loop]

,O"0.6 ....- i 0 .4 - * !

0.2 00 .....

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)

Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000

  • Page 60 of 107 107LAR Page60 o20 16-01 Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.2-3b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 - - - * - . - . a 1.0. - __-,'-___

-- Loop Manual: -i  : *" i i o 0.6 .. . ..-..-. . ..--- . ..-. . . . .. _... . . -

-: I i'  !

p"u I

'*I-I l1--+

I  :---Io I -- . .,-. . . -

= I 1

  • i iI

! I , I / /

0. p a p a p a a a 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 61 of 107 Page61 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.2-4a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 -

1.0 0.8

-- Loop 0.6

,-J 0.2 -

0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 62 of 107 o201 Page62 6-01 Rev. 0 107LAR

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8,2-4b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 II i 1.0 ,

.6 I I ___ ____

I I _ _

-- Lo auli - - 11 1

" I I 0.-q - p - -i' -

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1,000 1.000 Page 63 of 107 Page63of107LAR 2016-01 Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.2-5a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2-1.0 0.8

- Loop d0.6 0.4 --

  • 0.2 0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 64 of 107 Page64 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report- Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.2-5b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 - - 1'* I -

i _ _ i,_

IL i iI i".-...--. 1--- -'T .... .. ..I- ,

.. . qI.. . . . ..-... . . . I . . .* . .i .. -. .... i-...- -* . . ..

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1,000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 65 of 107 Page65 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.2-6a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.0 S i I

-J, I I I _

I I I _ _ _ __i 14 .. I*l i  !'

0. - -i I - -  ! - i 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1,000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 66 of 107 Page66 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report- Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.2-6b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 - . - * - - - * - * - * - -

U 0.6

- i I I I I I 0.2 LonMnal--!*"I r iIII _ Ii 0.0 -. . . -. - -.. I* * .. . . .. .. . -

0, 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)

Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 67 of 107 Page67 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Care Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.2-7a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.0 0.8

-* Loop 0.4 0.2 0.0 "

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (%Rated)

Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 68 of 107 107LARRev. 0 Page68 o2016-01

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FRGURE 8,2-7b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2-1.0 0.8 .....

0.4 .. .

0.2 .. . .

0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)

FRow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 69 of 107 Page69 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report,- Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-la. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: I EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 -

1.0 -- _

0.8 _ <

( 0.6 0.4 .. . .

0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 -100 110 Power (%Rated)

Pow~er

  • 50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 ___ __ 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 ___ _ 0.999 90.0 ___ _ 1.000 100.0 ___ __ 1.000 Page 70 of 107 Page70 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report- Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-l b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1.0 0.8 II

.. .. .. .. L 0.6 I * , * '- 1 i.1 - - - - -..... , -. .* -.... *-_ .. .. -..... - ...... . -. .

0.4 0 . . .*...

10. . 20.

. ...... ... 50...60

-30...4.0 70 .... 80 90... 100.....110...

Power  % Rated 0.2 0.0 Power *;50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 _____ 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 71 of 107 Page71 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-I c. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITON: I EXPOSURE RANJGE:. MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 I I I 1.0 S I Il i -- ---- i i I II, 0.8 .. . .... . -L . . . . I.. I3Jl*LII -. . . . . . . .

!1 1 1 I I I

,*0.6 I II

.... .. I-. .. .... 4 -.. . .. . . . .-.. . . . -...

C.,

S i i I I

- -. q - - q I 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power -<50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 _____ O.999 90.0 ____ 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 72 of 107 Page72 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-Id. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 i *! I I I 1.0 _

__ .____ I ______

I I V 0.8 s 50.0% FIo~w

  • i I I j 0.6 0.6 _ __* i*I 1 I C,.

0.4 .1[ I I

-- -* .. . - - --P-.---i-+-..... .....** 4- - -I- - .I..

0.2 + i I , i l t ,

1 .. 1 1  ; I

+ I I t  ; I 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power S 50.0%

(%Rated) Row >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0,687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 _____ 0,995 85.0 0.999 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 73 of 107 Page73 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8,3-2a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MDC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 ,

1.0 . . . .*. .

0.8 - - -_ ..

0.* .0 o,

S0.6 ... @0

-JJ 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)

Power _<50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 _____ 0.995 85.0 ____ 0.999 90.0 ___ __ 1.000 100.0 ___ __ 1.000 Page 74 of 107 Page74 o2016-01 i07LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-2b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 iI  ! I - ,

1.0

... 7 . K.. ... .. . .i -.. ... -... -- *i..

..... I . .

0.8 II iI _____

0.6 I I 0.6 I II i I..... .. .i.. . . .. . . . . .I. ..

< Io 0 0 1

1. . . i1 i . . - * . .-

I .-.- II

.J 0.4

! !I - I iI I

--

  • q---- q-4 ... .. - -*---- ... *------- - -

0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power -<50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 _____ 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 _____ 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 75of107 Page75 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report- Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-2c. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.0 - -

0.8 **

a 0.6 . . .

Lz

.(

0.2---

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power <--50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 _____ 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 _____ 0.999 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 ____ 1.000 Page 76 of 107 Page76 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-2d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAG VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPUCATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.6

  • iI / I f

- I  ! I!

,-1 i I I -- I .,Y 0.4

! !Ii I -I  !  !

0.2 .... y-- ---- t. .. ---- --.... ---- 4.- - . - . -. ..-------- -

0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)

'-Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 ____ 0.995 85.0 ____ 0.999 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 _____ 1,000 Page 77 of 107 Page77 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-3a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.2 .. . . . .

00 -~-

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Powr < 50.0%

(%Rated) FRow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0,O ___ 0.820 85.0 _____ 0.869 90.0 ___ __ 1.0o0 100.0 ___ __ 1.000 Page 78 of 107 Page78 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report- Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-3b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2

  • t 1.0 0.8 .. . _ ..

C,,

0.4 .. .. i 0.2 - -.....

0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power s 50.0%

(%Rated) Row >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 0.820 85.0 0.869 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 79 of 107 Page79 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-3c. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 1.0 .. . .--

I 0.8 L*0.6

(.

II

.I 0.2 0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(% Rated Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0,848 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 .738 O____

70.0O ____ 0.818 85.0 _____ 0.869 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 80 of 107 Page80 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-3d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1.0 -

0.8

_<50.0' 0.6 ....... 50 ILI 0.2 . . .... ;. .

0.0 q 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power -<50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 _____ 0.818'"

85.0 _____ 0,869 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 Page 81 of 107 107LARRev. 0 Page81 o2016-01

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report- Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-4a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION; 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 1.0 0.8

~0.6 .. .-

0.41 0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power

  • 50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 ____ 0.995 85.0 _____ 0.999 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 82 of 107 Page82 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report- Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-4b. OPERATING LIMfT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 i -

1.0 .. .. . .. .

0.8 ----

U.

0.6

-I 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power <*50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 ____ 0.995 85.0 ____ 0.999 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 ____ 1.000 Page 83 of 107 Page83 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-4c. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RAN~GE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 -

1.0 ... . .4 0.8 .. .

S0.6 -- *---

0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 _____ 0.840 50.0 _____ 0.897 70.0 _____ 0.995 65.0 0.999 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 ____ 1.000 Page 84 of 107 Page84 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-4d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp=)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1 .2 1.0 0.8 1 I i  !!

I iI!,

,I,  ! , I I I 0.6

' I i i i U--

0.4 I I

.. .. . * . . - . .. .. . ... p-.. . . . . . -- - - -p---4y 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power -<50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 ____ 1.000 Page 85 of 107 Page85 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 0.3-5a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPUCATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 1.0 . . .

0.8 c .6 CJ.

Uv 0.4 0.2 .. .. .

0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power *_50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0,745 0.592 40.0 0,868 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 _____ 0.995 85.0 ____ 0.999 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 86 of 107 Page86 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-5b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

AP)PLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1.0 '- °.- - - - .... - . -I. ......... *

  • - I I 0.8 I ;I D0.6 0.4 I I I!

0.2 I EI 1 I 1

- - - i - _L-L -

0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power

  • 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 ____ 0.995 85.0 _____ 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 87 of 107 Page87 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-5c. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2-1.0 . . ..

0.8 -____

  • ( 0.6 . .

C,.

0.4 ... .

0.2 .. ..

0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power

  • 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 ___ __ 0.995 85.0 ___ _ 0.999 90.0 ___ __ 1.000 100.0 ___ __ 1.000 Page 88 of 107 Page88 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8,3-5d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.0 0.8

,.J S0.6 ...

0.4 .....

0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(%Rated) Fiow >50% FRow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 ____ 0.840

  • 50.0 0.897 70.0 ____ 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0O ____ 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 89 of 107 Page89 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report- Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8,3.6a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1,2

  • -Si - f I 1.0 "1.......

....,--.....4. ...-....-¢......I ....-. . . ..

0.8 I  ! i .

I I 0.4

/ <o~%

  • "i I _, iI

/ i t / I t i

/ *

- * - - i 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power {%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0,592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 _____ 0.820 85.0 ____ 0,869 90.0 1,000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 90 of 107 107LAR Rev. 0 Page90 o2O16-01

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-6b. OPERATING LIMfT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: .BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 -

1.0 -__

0.8 0.6 (zLI

-i C

0.4 0.2 .... . .

0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)

  • Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 0.820 85.0 0.869 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000.

Page 91 of 107 Page91 o20I6-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-6c.

  • OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
  • APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 m 1.0 _ _

0.8 ... . .

0.4 0.2 0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592

  • 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 ___ __ 0.738 70.0 0.818 85.0 ___ __ 0.869 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0
  • 1.000 Page §2 of 107 Page92 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-6d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE" GNF3 1.2 1.1 *---*----.-

1.0 ----. 4-0.9 ......1-...

0.8 0.7 ... __ 0"0 0.

C.,

0.3 i~~~

0.2 . ... ., -

0.1 --

00iny 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)

Power *; 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Fbow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 ____ 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 0.818 85.0 0.869 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 93 of 107 Page93 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-7a. OPERATING LIMfT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2-1.0 0.8 a.*

<*0.6 U.

C,

,-I 0.4 .. .

0.2 .....

0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power

  • 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.5 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 .820 O____

85.0 0.869 90.0 ____ 1.000 100.0 1.000 Page 94 of 107 Page94 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-7b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1.0 .... .f 0.8 - i 0.4 0.2 .. . .

00-q 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Fkow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 ____ 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 ____ 0.820 85.0 ____ 0.869 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 ____ 1.000 Page 95 of 107 Page95 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report- Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-7c. OPERATING LIMIT LKGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 7

  • EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2-1 1.0 C. I oI

< 0.6.. .

. 1 CDI

-a" 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power

  • 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 _____ 0.818 85.0 0.869 90.0 _____ 1.000 100.0 _____ 1.000 Page 96 of 107 Page96 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 FIGURE 8.3-7d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)

APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 -

1.0 0.8 0

0.0 ~

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)

Power < 50.0%

(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 0.818 85.0 0.869 90.0 1.000 100.0 ____ 1.000 Page 97 of 107 Page97 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 Figureg9.1-1: Monitored Region Boundary (Case 1) 120 110 100 90 80 70 GO 50 0.

40 uJ 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 30 90 100 110 CORE FLOW (%rated)

Page 98 of 107 Page98 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report- Cycle 19 Revision 2 Figure 9.1-2: Monitored Region Boundary (Case 2) 1ag .........-...... - -;. .... . . . .-....- - . ..-.-... -.# -*

I: i i 00 110 CORE FLOW (% rated)

Page 99 of 107 Page99 o2016-01 107LAR Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 Figure 9.1-3: APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted Region Bounda*ry (Two Recirculatlon Loop Operation - Case 1) 120 r 51 r 1 T r 110 III I I I!I 100

.2- - - - - .- I .1 - L 90 80 i , Nomi~lValue

-t

  • 0 I s -

70 I - loalIle-80 7L .. * .. .. T. a _e... ..

a..

50 40 I " I RR 'TesricedlRe~gian 30 I Ii I I 20 I I I I i I I i I I I I I 10 I I I r I I l I I a i.-*--- o-****.-*1 0

0 10 20 30 40 SO 60 70 80 00 100 10 120 ALUGNED DRIVE FLOW (%rated)

Page 100 of 107 Pag 2016-01 Rev. 0 10of107LAR

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 Figure 9,t-4: APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpolnts and Restricted Region Boundary (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2) 1101* I) Ii , l

. ii , t ! *  ;,; ,

w SI  ! - - fcabeau

"' -. frctd"oi"i L.

0 0.L wi 0

,U~

_____  ! I___

x~z-r~i__ ,o-4 0 _10 .ito 5a 6#, 7 AUGNED DRiVE FLOW (%rated)

Page 101 of 107 Page 01 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 Figure 9.14; APRNM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted Region Boundary (Single Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1) a a I a 110 a a a a l 100-

- - II - -- -- - -- - - - - - - - - -

80-a a ... a .... , ,

N 70- t atI a a a -*

i a F a; al a aI eup c i a a I *R ~

esrct ii I uJ 0 I I -4 40 20.

.. ,.... . .... . . . ... ......4I--

. -... - - a a I i a Ia Il a a a

20. a aI aI I I a a

.. .. a* .. . . . . a .. a.t

. "Ja.. . . . aL... . a*1. . . a4.. . . a"i . . .. ai. . . . . . .

10 I i1 I . I I l I I ia

, I

  • I , I . I , I , I , t ,, L
  • I , I
  • V q I 60 90 100 110 120 0 10 20 30 49 60 00 70 ALIGNED DRIVE FLOW 4%rated)

Page 102 of 107 Pag 10 of107LAR 2016-01 Rev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 Figure 9.1-6: APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Selpoints and Restricted Region Boundary {Single Recircul.ation Loop Operation - Case 2)

I, i t _ _ I _ _

.h* I- ..

  • I - - -- -

AUIGNF*D DRIVi FLOW 1%tIe4*d Page 103 of 107 Page 03 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 Figure 9.1-7: APRNI Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1) 3 110 ...- . 4 3 I 3 3 100 90' 70 I

.1i I -

S! i! I 3 w

0 ." - I 3 I a- , / / , ' 1 - I 3 3 w

0

  • I i I r I U

i 3i I I 3 I 30* l I II I I I 3

, -, . I. . . . ' - _. _ . . 1 .

20 10-0 10 20 3o 40 90 60 70 80 81) tO0 110 120 ALIGNED DRIVE FLOW {% rated)

Page 104 of 107 Pag 2016-01 Rev. 0 10of107LAR

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 Figure 9.1-8: APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Dlock Setpoints (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2) itI L I

,I I  ! 1

, -- .*-.i:- -j " j ..

4/ 4 4 A,---

'- fi--i ..... -~--- ,-----t-1---h-t -

AL16NE] DRVE tFLOW L%

Page 105 of 107 Page 05 o2016-01 107LARRev. 0

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 Figure 9.1-9: APRMI Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpolnts (Single Recirculatlon Loop Operaition - Case 1) lI I I i I I I r I I 110, I----I S4- - 4. 4 - 4 -- 4 I- -

I I I I I II I I I

  • II I I I I I I i I I I I i I I
10. l I I I I i i i I r I I- - - - - - - -U 90, I I Ii i i i I i i iI i I L

I 1i I

iI I i i i I I fl~

I  ! I

-__/_______i____i f I 0.

I I I i i I i I I I 0

0 I IIIIiI I 40 I i I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I 3O 1 I I I 20 10 0'

10 29 0o 41) 50 609 71 99 101) 110 1~0 ALIGNED DRIVE FLOW (% roted)

Page 106 of 107 Pag 2016-01 Rev, 0 10of107LAR

River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 2 Figure 9.1-10: APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Singre Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2) t20 I.

I+/-h a

a-w 0

00 $~0 Ito 120 AtIGNWD DRIVE FLOW (5 rated)

Page 107 of 107 Page 07 o 107LAR2016-01 Rev. 0

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=RBG-47648,_Nineteenth_Fuel_Cycle_Core_Operating_Limits_Report,_Revision_2_River_Bend_Station_-_Unit_1_Docket_No._50-458_License_No._NPF-47&oldid=2510798"