RBG-47567, Submittal of Nineteenth Fuel Cycle Core Operating Limits Report (COLR)
| ML15140A088 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | River Bend  |
| Issue date: | 05/12/2015 |
| From: | Clark J Entergy Operations |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| RBG-47567 LAR-2015-01 | |
| Download: ML15140A088 (110) | |
Text
Entergy Operations, Inc.
River Bend Station 5485 U.S. Highway 61N Entergy St. Francisville, LA 70775 Tel 225-381-4177 Joseph A. Clark Manager, Licensing May 12, 2015 RBG-47567 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
Nineteenth Fuel Cycle Core Operating Limits Report (COLR)
River Bend Station - Unit 1 Docket No. 50-458 License No. NPF-47
Dear Sir or Madam:
Enclosed is Revision 0 of the River Bend Station (RBS) Core Operation Limits Report (COLR) for the nineteenth fuel cycle. This report is submitted in accordance with Technical Specification 5.6.5 of Appendix A of the Facility Operating License NPF-47.
This letter does not contain any commitments.
For further information, please contact me at (225) 381-4177.
Sincerely, JAC/bmb cc: Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV 1600 East Lamar Blvd.
Arlington, TX 76011-4511 A00 ý
RBG-47567 Page 2 of 2 NRC Senior Resident Inspector P. 0. Box 1050 St. Francisville, LA 70775 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Mr. Alan Wang MS O-8B1 One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852 Department of Environmental Quality Office of Environmental Compliance Radiological Emergency Planning and Response Section JiYoung Wiley P.O. Box 4312 Baton Rouge, LA 70821-4312 Public Utility Commission of Texas Attn: PUC Filing Clerk 1701 N. Congress Avenue P. O. Box 13326 Austin, TX 78711-3326 RBF1 0070 LAR 2015-01
Core Operating Limits Report Cycle 19 Revision 0
River 3end Station Core Operating Limits Report CycGe 19 Revisio* 0 Page 1 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 REVISION HISTORY Revision Revision Description 0 Original Issue Page 2 of 107 LAR-201 5-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 SCOPE ........................................................................................................................... 4
3.0 REFERENCES
........................................................................................................ 4 3.1 CURRENT CYCLE REFERENCES ........................................................................................................... 4 3.2 METHODOLOGY REFERENCES .............................................................................................................. 4 4.0 DEFINITIONS .......................................................................................................... 4 5.0 CORE DESIGN ................................................................................................................ 7 5.1 REFERENCE CORE LOADING PATTERN .................................................................................................... 7 5 .2 C O NTR OL R ODS ........................................................................................................................................ 7 6.0 AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (APLHGR) .................... 7 7.0 MINIM UM CRITICAL POW ER RATIO (MCPR) .......................................................... 7 7.1 FLOW-DEPENDENT MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPRF) VALUES: ....................................................... 7 7.2 POWER-DEPENDENT MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPRp) VALUES: ................................................ 8 8.0 LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (LHGR) ........................................................... 8 8.1 EXPOSURE-DEPENDENT LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (LHGR) VALUES: .............................................. 8 8.2 FLOW-DEPENDENT LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE FACTORS (LHGRFACF) VALUES: ............................... 9 8.3 FLOW-DEPENDENT LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE FACTORS (LHGRFACF) VALUES: ............................... 9 9.0 STABILITY ..................................................................................................................... 9 9.1 STABILITY REGION BOUNDARIES AND SETPOINTS .................................................................................... 10 9.2 APRM FLOW BIASED SIMULATED THERMAL POWER-HIGH TIME CONSTANT (SR 3.3.1.1.14) ..................... 11 Page 3 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 1.0 PURPOSE The COLR is controlled as a License Basis Document and revised accordingly for each fuel cycle or remaining portion of a fuel cycle. Any revisions to the COLR must be submitted to the NRC for information as required by Tech Spec 5.6.5 and tracked by RBS License Commitment Li 1358.
2.0 SCOPE As defined in Technical Specification 1.1, the COLR is the document that provides the core operating limits for the current fuel cycle. This document is prepared in accordance with Technical Specification 5.6.5 for each reload cycle using NRC-approved analytical methods.
The limits included in this report are:
- 4) LCO 3.2.4, Fraction of Core Boiling Boundary (FCBB)
- 5) LCO 3.3.1.1, RPS Instrumentation (RPS), Function 2.b
- 6) LCO 3.3.1.3, Periodic Based Detection System (PBDS)
3.0 REFERENCES
This section contains the background, cycle-specific, and methodology references used in the current cycle reload analysis.
3.1 Current Cycle References 3.1.1 ECH-NE-14-00048 Revision 0, Supplemental Reload Licensing Report for River Bend Station -
Unit 1 with GNF3 - Unit 1 Reload 18 Cycle 19.
3.1.2 ECH-NE-14-00049 Revision 0, Fuel Bundle Information Report for River Bend Station - Unit 1 Reload 18 Cycle 19.
3.1.3 Letter, R. E. Kingston to G. W. Scronce, "Time Constant Values for Simulated Thermal Power Monitor", RBC-46410, November 30, 1995.
3.1.4 RBS Updated Safety Analysis Report 3.1.5 ECH-NE-15-00004, Revision 0, "RBS C19 GESTAR Assessment" 3.2 Methodology References The Technical Specifications (TS) supported by each methodology reference are provided in brackets.
The following are applicable to GNF supplied fuel.
3.2.1 NEDE-24011-P-A, General Electric Standard Application for Reactor Fuel (GESTAR-II).
4.0 DEFINITIONS Page 4 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 4.1 Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (APLHGR) - the APLHGR shall be applicable to a specific planar height and is equal to the sum of the linear heat generation rates for all the fuel rods in the specified bundle at the specified height divided by the number of fuel rods in the fuel bundle.
4.2 Average Planar Exposure - the Average Planar Exposure shall be applicable to a specific planar height and is equal to the sum of the exposure of all the fuel rods in the specified bundle at the specified height divided by the number of fuel rods in the fuel bundle.
4.3 Critical Power Ratio (CPR) - the ratio of that power in the assembly, which is calculated by application of the fuel vendor's appropriate boiling correlation, to cause some point in the assembly to experience boiling transition, divided by the actual assembly operating power.
4.4 Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) - The River Bend Station specific document that provides core operating limits for the current reload cycle in accordance with Technical Specification 5.6.5.
4.5 Linear Heat Generation Rate (LHGR) - the LHGR shall be the heat generation per unit length of fuel rod. It is the integral of the heat flux over the heat transfer area associated with the unit length.
4.6 Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPR) - the MCPR shall be the smallest CPR which exists in the core.
4.7 MCPR Safety Limit - the minimum value of the CPR at which the fuel could be operated with the expected number of rods in boiling transition not exceeding 0.1% of the fuel rods in the core.
4.8 Aligned Drive Flow - Adjusted FCTR card input drive flow signal that accounts for actual variations in the core flow to drive flow relationship.
4.9 Monitored Region - The area of the core power and flow operating domain where the reactor may be susceptible to reactor instabilities under conditions exceeding the licensing basis of the current reactor system.
4.10 Restricted Region - The area of the core power and flow operating domain where the reactor is susceptible to reactor instabilities in the absence of restrictions on core void distributions.
4.11 Setpoint "Setup" - A FCTR card feature that sets the normal "non-setup" ElA APRM flow-biased scram and control rod block trip reference setpoints associated with the Exclusion and Restricted Regions higher to permit required reactor maneuvering in the Restricted Region when stability controls are in effect.
4.12 EOR - the cycle exposure corresponding to all rods out, 100% power/100% flow, and normal feedwater temperature.
4.13 MOC - Middle of Cycle (EOR - 2,794 MWd/MTU) [Reference 3.1.1, page 19].
4.14 EOC - End of Cycle (Core Exposure 35,094 MWd/MTU) [Reference 3.1.1. page 6].
4.15 FFWTR - Final Feedwater Temperature Reduction.
4.16 FHOOS - Feedwater Heater Out of Service.
4.17 PROOS - Pressure Regulator Out of Service.
4.18 SLO - Single Loop Operation.
Page 5 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 4.19 TBOOS -Turbine Bypass Out of Service 4.20 AREVA - AREVA NP Inc.
4.21 GNF - Global Nuclear Fuel 4.22 EOC-RPT - End of Cycle Recirculation Pump Trip 4.23 Reference Core Loading Pattern - The Core Loading Pattern Used for Reload Licensing Analysis.
4.24 Application Condition - The combination of equipment out of service conditions for which LHGRFAC and MCPR limits are determined [Reference 3.1.1, page 38]. The Application Conditions are as follows:
Application FWHOOS / EOC-RPT PROOS TBOOS Condition FFWTR OOS 1 x 2 X X 3 X X 4 X X 5 X X x 6 X X X 7 X X X X All application conditions address the licensed core flow.
Page 6 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 5.0 CORE DESIGN 5.1 Reference Core Loading Pattern The original Reference Core Loading pattern is presented in Reference 3.1.1.
During the core shuffle a fuel failure was identified. This bundle was scheduled to be shuffled, but because of the failure was discharged and replaced with a similar bundle that was scheduled for discharge. The revised core loading was evaluated in Reference 3.1.5 with the determination that the reload evaluation results were applicable to the revised core.
512 Control Rods The River Bend core utilizes the GE design control rods, non GE design CR-82M and CR-82M-1 bottom entry cruciform control rods. These control rod designs are discussed in more detail in Reference 3.1.4, Sections 4.1 and 4.2.
6.0 AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (APLHGR)
Per Technical Specification 3.2.1, all APLHGR values shall not exceed the exposure-dependent limits reported as follows:
Fuel Type Figure GNF2 6.1-1a GNF3 6.1-1b For single loop operation (SLO) a multiplier of 0.83 [Reference 3.1.1, page 58] is applied to the APLHGR limits for all fuel types.
7.0 MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPR)
Per Technical Specification 3.2.2, the MCPR values shall be equal to or greater than the operating limit.
The operating limit is the maximum of the flow-dependent minimum critical power ratio (MCPRF) and the power-dependent minimum critical power ratio (MCPRp).
MCPRF and MCPRp limits are provided in Sections 7.1 and 7.2 below. These limits address the different fuel types, exposure ranges and application conditions.
For single recirculation loop operation (SLO), the MCPR limit is increased by 0.02 [Reference 3.1.1, page 34] to address the difference in the safety limit MCPR reported in Technical Specification 2.1.1.2.
7.1 Flow-Dependent Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPRF) Values:
The MCPRF curves are from Reference 3.1.1, Appendix D as augmented by Reference 3.1.1, Appendix F and are found in the following figures:
Application Figures Condition GNF2 GNF3 1 7.1-1a 7.1-1b Page 7 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 Application Figures Condition GNF2 GNF3 2 7.1-2a 7.1-3b 3 7.1-3a 7.1-3b 4 7.1-4a 7.1-4b 5 7.1-5a 7.1-5b 6 7.1-6a 7.1-6b 7 7.1-7a 7.1-7b 7.2 Power-Dependent Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPRp) Values:
The MCPRP curves are from Reference 3.1.1, Appendix D as augmented by Reference 3.1.1, Appendix F and are found in the following figures:
Figure Application BOC - MOC MOC - EOC Condition GNF2 GNF3 GNF2 GNF3 1 7.2-1a 7.2-1b 7.2-1c 7.2-1d 2 7.2-2a 7.2-2b 7.2-2c 7.2-2d 3 7.2-3a 7.2-3b 7.2-3c 7.2-3d 4 7.2-4a 7.2-4b 7.2-4c 7.2-4d 5 7.2-5a 7.2-5b 7.2-5c 7.2-5d 6 7.2-6a 7.2-6b 7.2-6c 7.2-6d 7 7.2-7a 7.2-7b 7.2-7c 7.2-7d More limiting values of the power dependent limits may be used in lieu of those indicated by a particular operating mode. For example EOC values may be used instead of the MOC values.
8.0 LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (LHGR)
Per Technical Specification 3.2.3, the LHGR values for any rod at any axial location shall not exceed the exposure-dependent limits multiplied by the smaller of either the power-dependent or flow-dependent LHGR factors.
For single loop operation (SLO) a multiplier of 0.83 [Reference 3.1.1, page 55] is applied to the LHGR limits for all fuel types.
For two recirculation loop and single recirculation loop operation the LHGR multiplier is as follows:
For two recirculation loop operation:
LHGRFAC = MIN(LHGRFACp, LHGRFACF)
For single loop operation:
LHGRFAC = MIN(LHGRFACp, LHGRFACF, 0.83) 8.1 Exposure-Dependent Linear Heat Generation Rate (LHGR) Values:
Page 8 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 GNF2 and GNF3 exposure-dependent LHGR values are considered GNF proprietary and will not be contained in the COLR. The GNF2 LHGR values may be found in Reference 3.1.2, page 3. Per Reference 3.1.1, Appendix F the GNF2 exposure dependent LHGR values may be applied to the GNF3 fuel.
8.2 Flow-Dependent Linear Heat Generation Rate Factors (LHGRFACF) Values:
The LHGRFACF curves are from Reference 3.1.1, Appendix D as augmented by Reference 3.1.1, Appendix F and are found in the following figures:
Application Figures Condition GNF2 GNF3 1 8.2-1a 8.2-1b 2 8.2-2a 8.2-2b 3 8.2-3a 8.2-3b 4 8.2-4a 8.2-4b 5 8.2-5a 8.2-5b 6 8.2-6a 8.2-6b 7 8.2-7a 8.2-7b 8.3 Power-Dependent Linear Heat Generation Rate Factors (LHGRFACp) Values:
The LHGRFACp curves are from Reference 3.1.1, Appendix D as augmented by Reference 3.1.1, Appendix F and are found in the following figures:
Figlure Application BOC - MOC MOC - EOC Conditions GNF2 GNF3 GNF2 GNF3 1 8.3-1a 8.3-1b 8.3-1c 8.3-1d 2 8.3-2a 8.3-2b 8.3-2c 8.3-2d 3 8.3-3a 8.3-3b 8.3-3c 8.3-3d 4 8.3-4a 8.3-4b 8.3-4c 8.3-4d 5 8.3-5a 8.3-4b 8.3-5c 8.3-5d 6 8.3-6a 8.3-4b 8.3-6c 8.3-6d 7 8.3-7a 8.3-4b 8.3-7c 8.3-7d More limiting values of the power dependent multipliers may be used in lieu of those indicated by a particular operating mode. For example EOC values may be used instead of the MOC values.
9.0 STABILITY The following Technical Specifications / Technical Requirements contain stability related requirements:
- TS 3.2.4, Fraction of Core Boiling Boundary (FCBB)
- TS 3.3.1.1, RPS Instrumentation (RPS) 0 TS 3.3.1.3, Periodic Based Detection System (PBDS) 0 TR 3.3.1.1, RPS Instrumentation (RPS)
Page 9 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0
. TR 3.3.2.1, Control Rod Block Instrumentation 9.1 Stability Region Boundaries and Setpoints This section contains region boundaries, setpoints and other stability related requirements. The stability region boundaries and setpoints are as follows Description Figure Monitored Region Boundary (Case 1) 9.1-1 Monitored Region Boundary (Case 2) 9.1-2 APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted 9.1-3 Region Boundary (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1)
APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power- High Scram Setpoints and Restricted 9.1-4 Region Boundary (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2)
APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted 9.1-5 Region Boundary (Single Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1)
APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted 9.1-6 Region Boundary (Single Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2)
APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Two Recirculation Loop 9.1-7 Operation - Case 1)
APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Two Recirculation Loop 9.1-8 Operation - Case 2)
APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Single Recirculation 9.1-9 Loop Operation - Case 1)
APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Single Recirculation 9.1-10 Loop Operation - Case 2)
Note: For Figures 9.1-3 to 9.1-10, the Nominal Setpoints should be used for indicating the entry into a particular stability region as allowed and appropriate actions be taken prior to the entry In the table above, two distinct operating states (Case 1 and Case 2) are considered. These are described as follows:
Case I - Normal Feedwater Heating Operation or Low Reactor Power:
TFW (at rated)>"FTDESIGN (at rated) F, and rated equivalent at off-rated reactor conditions OR P5_30%
Case 2 - Reduced Feedwater Heating Operation:
TFw (at rated)< TFDESIGN (at rated) F AND P>30%
Page 10 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 The APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High scram setpoint and Restricted Region Boundary, and APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints are given in terms of aligned drive flow. The aligned drive flow is calculated from the input drive flow using the following relationship:
101.209 x A40 - 31.028 x Al00 + 70.181 x W5 WD = 70.181 - (*1oo - A40')
Where: Wb = FCTR card input drive flow in percent rated, WD = Aligned drive flow in percent rated, A40 = Low flow drive flow alignment setting, and 100 A = High flow drive flow alignment setting.
9.2 APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power-High Time Constant (SR 3.3.1.1.14)
The simulated thermal power time constant is 6 +/- 0.6 seconds (Reference 3.1.3). Thus the maximum simulated thermal power time constant for use in meeting the surveillance requirement is 6.6 seconds.
Page 11 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 6.1-1a. MAXIMUM AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (MAPLHGR) VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE FUEL TYPE: GNF2 15 14 13 -'"*, .....---------
....-".T* .... -..
' .... I- "*L-----....--... .....- ..-"..... .... ,..... i".... r--- ...-
12 11 10 9
8 3: 7
-i Q.
6 5
4 3
2.
1 0
0 20 40 60 80 Average Planar Exposure (GWD/MTU)
Average Planar MAPLHGR Limit Exposure (kWift) 0 00 13.78 19.31 13.78 67.00 7..50 70.00 6,69 Page 12 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 6.1-1b. MAXIMUM AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (MAPLHGR) VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE FUEL TYPE: GNF3 15 14 13 12 11 10 9
8 CD I 7
-J 0~
6 5
4 3
2 0
0 20 40 60 80 Average Planar Exposure (GWD/MTU)
Average Planar MAPLHGR Limit Exposure (kW/ft) 0.00 13.78 1931 13.78 67.00 7.50 70.00 6.69 Page 13 of 107 LAR-201 5-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 f FIGURE 7.1-1a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE FLOW IMCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 FUEL TYPE: GINF2 1.5 14................
1.4 ............
1-3 C.
U 1.2 1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow(% Rated)
Power Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.26 1.34 30.0 1..26 134 50.0 1.20 1.27 72.0 1.20 1.20 100.0 1.20 1..20 109.5 1.20 1..20 Page 14 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.1-1b. OPERATINfG LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1,5
............O 1.3 CLo too 1,2 ..........op
- 1. .................. .
1.0 -
Flow (% Rated)
Power Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20..0 1.26 1.34 30.0 1,26 1L34 50.0 1.20 1-27 72-0 1.20 1.20 100 0 1..20 1-20 109.5 1.20 1.20 Page 15 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.1-2a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.5
........i..... ... . . ..
. ..... ....................... .............. .......... .. . . . .. . . .. .i .. .. . . . . . ... . ... . .
1A4 ...
1.3 0t ......
1.2
~~~ ... ..... ... ..
- ......~ . ...........
~~..
1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Power Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.26 1.34 30.0 1,26 1-34 50.0 1 20 1127 72.0 1.20 1.20 100.0 1 20 1.20 109.5 1.20 1.20 Page 16 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.1-2b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.5 1_... ...........
Lo.
1.3 .....
0~
U 1.2 1.1 1.0 110 Flow(% Rated)
Power Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20..0 1.26 1.34 30.0 1.26 1.34 50.0 1.20 1.27 72-0 1.20 1.20 100.0 1..20 1..20 109.5 1.20 1-20 Page 17 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.1-3a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.5 .......... ... .. . ...... i . ...... ....i...................... ...... . ....................
..I.
1.4 i
..........A.t..-. ~ ... . . . ....... .........-.......... ............... . . . . . . . . .
.o.... .........
1.3 ....
0.
Uo
......i..
. . ..... ... . ....... . .... i ....
1.2 .... . . .. ... * . . .......... . . .. . . .
..... .!.......... .. .. ............i... . . .. .!. . .
1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Power Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.2.6 1 34 30.0 1.26 1.34 50.0 1-20 1t27 72-0 1.20 1.20 100.0 1..20 1..20 109.5 1.20 1-20 Page 18 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.1-3b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow fMCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 14 1.3 0L 1.2 1.1 1.0 110 Flow (% Rated)
Power Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1 26 1.34 30.0 1-26 1,34 50.0 1.20 1-27 72..0 1.20 1.20 100 0 1.20 1.20 109,5 1,20 1120 Page 19 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.1-4a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 15 Lo(
14
-- Loop, 1[3 12 ...... ............
1.2 1. .............
1.0 -p Flow (% Rated)
Power Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1-42 72..0 1.33 1.36 100 0 1..29 1.29 109.5 1-27 1.27 Page 20 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.1-4b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 14 13 a-1.2 1.1 1.0 Flow (% Rated)
Power Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1-38 1A47 50.0 1-35 1-42 72..0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1129 1.29 109.5 1127 1.27 Page 21 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.1-5a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.5 Loop Auto .....
1.4 .........
Loop Manual . . ... .. . . . .. ... . ...
- 1...- ---------- --
CL 1.2 ...
1.1 .......
f----------
1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Power Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20..0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72-0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page 22 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.1-5b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.5
...L o.c
.- Loop-1.3 0.
1.2 1.1 1.0 110 Flow (% Rated)
Power Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20..0 1.38 147 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72.0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1 29 1..29 109,5 1.27 1 27 Page 23 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.1-6a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1,5 1.4 1---------
1.3 0.
0 1.2 1.1 1.0 Flow (% Rated)
Power Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20..0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72..0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1..29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page 24 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.1-6b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.4 1.3 re CL 1.2 1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Power Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1 38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50.0 1235 1-42 72.0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1.29 109.5 1-27 1-27 Page 25 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.1-7a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow (MCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.4 1.3 a.
1.2 1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Power Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20 0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1-38 1.47 50.0 1.35 1.42 72..0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1.29 1 29 109.5 1.27 1.27 Page 26 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.1-7b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE Flow IMCPRF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.5
.4 .... . ...........
1.4 Loop
- 1. .............
CL
(.)
1.2 1.1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 so 90 100 110 Flow(% Rated)
Power Loop
(% Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 1.38 1.47 30.0 1.38 1.47 50..0 1.35 1.42 72.0 1.33 1.36 100.0 1..29 1..29 109.5 1.27 1..27 Page 27 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-1a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0
- 2.8 ...... ... ...... ....... - ........... -------
2.6 4-,
- 50% Flo W ....................
2.4- ..........
4.
2.2 -
.I.
- 0. 2.0 ... .. .................... ..........
1.8 1.6 .......... .....................
1.4 . .. .........
..i .... .......
....[......... . ......... .... ... ......
1-2 1.0 - I -
- U 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power 650.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40..0 1.59 50.0 1.59 70.0 1.59 85.0 1.44 865.0 1.44 90_0 1.39 100.0 1.35 Page 28 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-1b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRP)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8 2.6 2-4 22
- 0. 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2-23 2-58 40-0 1.98 2.15 40.0 1.64 50a0 1.64 70,0 1.64 85.0 1.49 85.0 1.49 90.0 1.44 100.0 1.40 Page 29 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-1c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWIER fMCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: I EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO) EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF 2 3.0 2.8 4 ..............
2.6 4 ------------------ ------------- ----------------------- -------
,450% Flo'YV .........
2.4 .......
22 4 .. ..
r L 2.0 ....
1.8 ........... . . . . . . . . .. . . --- ----
1.6 ------------- -------- -------- ---------- -------
1.4 -1 12 -------------------- ---------------- ------
1.0 . [ .. 1 - . [.-
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power - 5010%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40-0 1.63 50.0 1.63 70.0 1.59 85.0 1..48 85.0 1.48 90.0 1.44.
100.0 1.41 Page 30 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-1d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: I EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 . - .- . .- .
2.8 .
2.6
. 00% .......
- o *ii -iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~i iiii ....
2.4 ------------- ----------------- - --------
... . 50..0% . FIl v 22 .... ..... .. ........
- - -------- ------- - --------------I ------
io 2.0 ......... ... ........
1.8 ............ .. .... .. . . . . .... ... . ....i. . . . . . .
7 ----------
1.6
-........7 17 ý
.......Ii 1.4 . . . . . .................
12 ---------- ------------- ............... ------------- -------- ........
I ----
1.0 - P P F S my ~ p - p 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8o 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power - 50.0%
(% Ratedl Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40..0 1.68 50.0 1.68 70.0 1.64 85.0 1.53 85,0 1.53 90..0 1.49 100,0 1.46 Page 31 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-2a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 - .- . . - U i ... ... ........ ........
2.8 . ........ .......... ...... .........
2.6 ----------------- ------- -----------
2ý4 *50% FI .:...... .... [ ------------ ........
- i. 2.0 5 0 Io' ,7 ............
1.8 A.................... . ... .......... .......................
1.6 ................
1.4- ---------------- ------ .. ..
1.2 - ----------- -------------- --- 7 1.0 - .- S S *- . S D 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power .< 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2-18 2ý53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40,0 1..59 50.0 1.59 70,0 1.59 85.0 1.46 85.0 1.46 90..0 1.42 100,0 1.39 Page 32 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-2b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 22 iL 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power 6 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23,8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40-0 1.64 50.0 1.64 70.0 1.64 85.0 1..51 85.0 1.51 90..0 1.47 100.0 1.44 Page 33 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-2c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 . .- . .n *-
- ~~
~ .. .... ........
.. ~ ~ ~~
2.8 2.6 2ý4
.............. ~~~~~~~~~
... . . . . :. . . . . . ". . . . . . .... . ... ... . .. . . . . . . . . . . ~~~~~~~
2.2 iv i.0 %,0 ... ......... ............ ....... ..... ...'.... .........
i........... -- ---- -- -......i........
"2.0 1.8 1.6 1.41 1.2 ... .....-.. . ............. . . . .........--
1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
- 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 1 63 50.0 1.63 70.0 1.59 85.0 1..51 85.0 1.51 90..0 1.48 100.0 1.44 Page 34 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-2d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8 2.6
>50000 Fiob,------ -- ---------- i 2-4 22 ; ..............................
C. 2.0 -
1.8 - ......... ...... . ........
1.6 -
1.4-1.2 -
.. ~~~~~ ... ..... ..
... .. --------------..... i -----------
1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
- 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40..0 1.68 50.0 1.68 70.0 1,64 85.0 1..56 85.0 1.56 90.0 1.53 100.0 1.49 Page 35 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-3a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 2.8 .....
2.6
'ý50% Fl ..
2.4 ........
2.2 ...... .. .....
56.0% Flo"V iL
- 0. 2.0 ............
1.8 ....................................... ---- ---- ..........-------------
... ------------ 7 --------------
1.6 .................................. ------
1.4 ....... ....---------------------- ---------------------- . . ......... 7 12 ------------I-- ---------- ------------ ----------------- ----------------------- -
1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8'0 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power 50.0%
6
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40.0 2.09 50.0 1.95 70.0 1.75 85.0 1..64 85.0 1.42 90..0 1.39 1000 1.35 Page 36 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-3b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8 2.6 24 ...... . ... .... .:. . .. . . . .. .. .. ... .. ..... . ...; .... .... ... ... . . . . . ... . .;....
1 36 1w 2.2 S5.%Flo
....... ... . .i. .. . .......
...... i a-C, 2.0 .....
i....... .......- ... .....!.. . . . . . ... ........ -------------- ..... ..!.......... .........
1.8 ..............
........ ...................... ........... ... ..... .................. ............ ....i. ...
1.6 ...........
. ...... ......... ........i............... .........
1.4 1.2 1.0 - a- S * - S fl S- S S 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power 500%H
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 t98 2.15 40.0 2.14 50.0 2.00 70..0 1.80 865.0 1.69 85.0 1.47 90.0 1.44 100.0 1.40 Page 37 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-3c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 2.8 ..... ........
2.6 ----------
.50% Flow ... .. ....... .... ........................
2A ------------ ...................
2.2 ............
( 20 ..
.T .....
1.8 + -------- ---
1.6 1.4 . .. . . . .... . .... . . .. .. . ...
1.2 - ---------
1.0 q- p~9~ q - y * -, -
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power !950.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 2.09 50.0 1.99 70.0 1.80 85.0 1.70 85.0 1.47 90..0 1.44 100.0 1.41 Page 38 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-3d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8 ........... .....
....... ......i........ ...... ....... ........... ..........
2.6 2A4 ------------------ ----------- -------- - --------------
.. .. .... .... ....... . .L.. . .....
22
- 0%Flowv y*4 ...
I 0.- 2,0-20 ..........
1.8 ------ ----- ------------- ----------
1.6- ------------- ----------
1.4-
.......A 12 -
...................................... - I-------------
1.0 U U U- U- U S-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power 2950.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40.0 2.14 50.0 2.04 70.0 1.85 85.0 1.75 85.0 1,52 90..0 1.49 100.0 1.46 Page 39 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-4a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 . - .- I I fl I - *- *n I - *- I fl 2.8 2.6 -- I.. .... .......
2.4 .......................
I ...........
......... ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... ... III. . . . .. . . ... . .
- 22. 5/aFlo.w a- 2.0 1.8 . ............
1.6 1.4 -- I I I 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 so go 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power -6500%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1-93 2.10 40-0 1.64 50.0 1.59 70.0 1.59 85.0 1.46 85.0 1.46 90.0. 1.41 100.0 1.37 Page 40 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-4b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MC PRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 i.- 2.0
~2 1.8 1.6 1.4 12 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power 50.0%
M%Rated) Flow >50% Flow 238 2-23 2-58 40.0 1.98 2-15 40.0 1.69 50.0 1.64 70.0 1.64 85.0 1,51 85.0 1..51 90.0 1.46 100.0 1.42 Page 41 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.24c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRP)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 2.8 ..... .. . .. . ... ....... ..... .... '.... . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . ... -;. ... ....... *. . . ... .. ...... . . .... .... ...
2.6 2A4 ý5 , 0 %°F lo .. ....i5.................
2,2
- 22 0- 2.0 1.8
...... .. ,.. . .. ..F . . . . . . .. .... . . . . .. . ; . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . -7. . . . . ... .. . . .,-. . . . . .
..........,L
..... L......... ....L .. . .. .. ..i .... . .. ........ ...........i.. . .. ....--. . .. .. . .. ..................- . .. .. . ...."-.. .. .. .
1.6.
1.4 1 1 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40-0 1.66 50.0 1.65 70.0 1.61 85.0 *1.*51 85.0 1.51 90.0 1.47 100.0 1.43 Page 42 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-4d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRP)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 - .- .
2.8 ... ...
i ~~~.....i ................ *... .......i......
2.6 2-4
...:<-5 0% Floiv. ~~~~~~~~~~
...... ................ ...... ~~~~~~
2.2 .......
- 0. 2.0 ....
1.8 1.6 1.4 ... . ........ ............. . . . .. . . . . . . .. .... .
1.2 .....
t0 p - . - p - p 10w 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power L 50,0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40-0 1.71 50.0 1.70 70.0 1.66 85.0 1..56 85.0 1.56 90..0 1.52 100.0 1.43 Page 43 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-5a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 2.8 ............. ...
2.6 ------------------------- ------- --- ------------
... ,;ý50% Flo' 2.4 .......
22 0 0E . .......
iL 2.0 ... ............. .. ..
1.8 ............
1.6 -------
14 ----------------------- _ 4 ---
1.2 1.0 q p q-p-p-p 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 so go 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
- 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2-18 2.53 40.0 1..93 2-10 40-0 1.64 50-0 1.69 70.0 1-59 85.0 1.49 85.0 1.49 90.0 1.45 100-0 1.41 Page 44 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-5b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8 2.6 ----------
2-4 -------- ----------
2.2 a- 2.0 .........
u ------- - --- --- - - ------- ---- L ..........
ý5 5.Fiw, .. ........
1.8 ----------- ---- :----
1.6 1.4 1-2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power <50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40.0 1.69 50.0 1,64 70-0 1.64 85.0 1.54 85.0 1.54 90..0 1 50 100.0 1.46 Page 45 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-5c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 26 2..4
...... .~50.0%
........... Flo'W... ... -.--..
2.2
- 0. 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 -.. .. ... . .. .
1,0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2-53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40..0 1.66 50.0 1.65 70.0 1.61 85.0 1.54 85.0 1.54 90..0 1.51 100.0 1.46 Page 46 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-5d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8 2.62.4...... ......
2.4 2.2 25 202 .0..... ... ......
1.8 1.4 1.4 ..........-
10 ...........
1.0 i 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power 650.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 2.03 2.15 40.0 1.71 50.0 1.70 70,0 1.66 85.0 1..59 85.0 1.59 90..0 1 56 100.0 1.51 Page 47 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-6a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 .- .- .- .
2.8 4 .... .
......... -- ------- -A.. .......... . ........... I-2.6 ----------- -------- . . .. ... ... . ..- -
........>50%
...Flo;
... .. i.....................
2-4 ------------------.........
2.2 ......
50.0% F16W L 2.0 ...........
1.8 ..... ....... ...........
1.6 ---------- ---------- ------ ------------- -- -------------
1.4. ------------
1.2 ----------
In
- S-
- S- S- I - I I I 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
- 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40..0 2.09 50.0 1.95 70.0 1.75 85.0 1..64 85.0 1-44 90 0 1.41 100.0 1.37 Page 48 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-6b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 2.8 2.6 2ý4 22 i,, 2.0 1.8 1.6 14 1.2 1.0 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
- 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2-23 2.58 40.0 1..98 2-15 40.0 2-14 50.0 2.00 70.0 1.80 85.0 1.69 85.0 1..49 90..0 1.46 100.0 1 1.42 Page 49 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-6c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0
.............*i ...... . .
....... ~. ....... ..
2.6 i ........! ........ *........ i............
.....i..... .... ......... .. ........
...... ...... ..... ..........i.........*.. ...
2.4
... .... ~ F.i... ~ ~ . ~. ..5~r0 ........
.. . ... ....... " ............. ... t ..... .......i..... -------
- 22. ...77.1Z II*~~~ ........ .......... 71 .... ..i..... .......... ....
U"L 2.0 1.8
. . ....I . . . . . .............
.L ..... .......... --.........
. . . ... i ........ ..........
1.4- - - -- - -- - - -- - - --- - - ........ ......
1.2 1.0 - q- p -
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power
- 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23,8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40-0 2.09 50.0 1.99 70.0 1.80 85.0 1.70 8560 1.51 90..0 1.47 100.0 1,43 Page 50 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-6d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POW ER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TC EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF :3 3.0 2.8 .....
S0 .....S "F * ,'-" .' " ... .. .. .ii............... . i ii !*
- ii 2.6
% .bo.lo...
...................... .... ........... .... . i ... ...i........................ ;,..
2-4
................ ..i..... .......*..... ....... ..... ..i... - .....
---11.. ..ý.... .... ... .......ý..ý..ý...
.I -----... --..---..---.--- ..----......
22 Ut iL 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 - ~ U I 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power
- 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0' 2.03 2.15 40-0 2.14 50.0 2.04 70.0 1,85 85.0 1.75 85.0 1.56 90.0 1.52 100.0 1 1.48 Page 51 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-7a. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 L.... .. ..
2.8 2.6 50% F ----- .... ..
24
-~i ... . ...... ............... . . . . . ...--------- ---- --..--- .....
22 S2.0 1.8 1.6 . .. . . . . .... ..........................* .
1.4 1.2 1.0 , ,p , , I - , ,I 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power
- 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.93 2.10 40..0 2.09 500 1.95 70.0 1-75 85.0 1_64 85.0 1.47 90-0 1.45 100.0 1.41 Page 52 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-7b. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 - .- . .- . .- .
2.8 .....
2.6 .......... -------
2.4 22
....I..
1.8 ......... .. -------
1.6 1 ---------------- ......
1.4- ................ . ..... ..i.... ....!. .
1.2 1.0 - I - I I
- 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power 5 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.23 2.58 40.0 1.98 2.15 40.0 2.14 50.0 2.00 70_0 1.80 85.0 1.69 85.0 1.52 90.0 1.50 100.0 1.46 Page 53 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-7c. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRP)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2
" 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power 9 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2.18 2.53 40.0 1.98 2.10 40.0 2.09 50 1.99 70,0 1.80 85.0 1.70 85.0 1.54 90..0 1.51 100,0 1.46 Page 54 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 7.2-7d. OPERATING LIMIT MCPR VERSUS CORE POWER (MCPRp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 3.0 . - U .- . .n .-
2.8 2.6 2-4 2.2 ....
......... .........,.ii?iiiiiiliiiiiiiiiiiiiii)
(.
C. 2.0
. . . . . . . 0.......... .. .. : . . .. .. .... .....
1.8 ..... .... .. ........... ................... ..............
. - . ..... . . . ..- .. ... .. . . . .. .... -.. . ..==
1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 I S I-I 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
- 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 2,23 2.58 40-0 2.03 2.15 40-0 2.14 50.0 2.04 70.0 1.85 85.0 1.75 8M.0 1.59 90..0 1.56 100.0 1.51 Page 55 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.2-1a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 1..0 .............
08 Loop
. L,ac
,-I 0 .4 ........... .....
0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% Loop Ratedi Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40-0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0..919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 56 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.2-1b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: I FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1 ,0 ---- . -------
08 Loop 0.6
... Loc 0.4 ......
02 0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42-4 0-650 0-527 76..6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1-000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 57 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.2-2a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 12 1 .0 ...............
0.8 3 Loop 06
Loi 0.2 0.0 -
110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76..6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1-000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 58 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.2-2b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1 .0 ...... .....
0.8 Loop I~L 0.6 (9
Loc 0-4 .............
0-2 0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0__5__0 42.4 0-650 0.527 76..6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 11000 109.5 1000 1.000 Page 59 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.2-3a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 1.0 0.8 Loop 06 u- "* 0.4.
6 -----
02 00, ..............
0.0 4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0-527 76..6 1.000 0.919 83 7 1.000 1 000 109.5 11000 1.000 Page 60 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.2-3b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1 .0 -----------..
0.8 3 Loop 0.6 L
-Lo 0.4 0.2 0.0 -
Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20..0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76..6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1000 109.5 1-000 11000 Page 61 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.2-4b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1 .0 --..-----...
0.8 Loop S0.6
,-1 0 .4 -----------.
0.2-02 .....................
0.0 -6 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.600 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0-650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.6 1.000 1.000 Page 62 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.2-4b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 0.8 Loop
= ..... L-oc
-J 0 -4 -.............
0.2 0.0 -4.
Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.600 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76..6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 63 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.2-5a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 1 .0 ...................
0.8* . ...
Loop Mar 0.6 0
.i ....... Loqp-,
0-4 04 ............ - ---
0.2 00 .................. .
0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 so 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0 500 40,0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76..6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1 000 1..000 109,5 1.000 1.000 Page 64 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.2-5b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 12 0-8 Loop i 0..6 UJ 0 .4 .. .......... ,
02 0.0-110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20..0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0-527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1..000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 65 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.2-6a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 12 1 .0 -----..---..
0.8 L) Loop 0-6 oLoc 0.4 02 0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0.500 40.0 0.650 0-500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1..000 1.000 109,5 1.000 1_00 Page 66 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.2-6b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1.0 ------
10-0.8 LoopI
~0.6
-J 0 .4 ------------
0.2 00 -
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1O0 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20..0 0.650 0 500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76..6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1.000 1-000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 67 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.2-7a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 1.0 0,8 Loop 0.6 C,,
L.-o
- 0 .- I. ..
0.2 0 . ..... .....
o-0o 0 .10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Flow (% Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0_500 40.0 0.650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 766 1.000 0.919 83.7 1..000 1.000 109.5 1.000 1.000 Page 68 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.2-7b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE Flow (LHGRFACF)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2
.0 ......... ....
1.0 0.8 Loop 0.6 0.2 002 -
110 Flow(% Rated)
Flow (% Loop Rated) Manual Loop Auto 20.0 0.650 0 500 40.0 0-650 0.500 42.4 0.650 0.527 76.6 1.000 0.919 83.7 1..000 1-000 109,5 1-000 1000 Page 69 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-1a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 .- .
1.0 0.8 ....
. .. 50.O0%
...... .....5 . FFlow O...... ........
06 u, ......%... ........ . ... .................
=
-j- ------------
0-4 1 ---------
........... ..... .. .. i . .. ... . . ........... . . . . . ..
0.2 ............................
0.0 i W.
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power 6 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 0.999 85.0 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 Page 70 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-1b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1.0 iiii.iii !i i..ii+
ii~ iiii?:..... iiii+ ....... i...........i....... ........ ... ........
0.8
...... i.....................
l ............................ .......... . ........
0.6 1 U.
- o.
0.4 0.2 -
. . .~. .--..
.................... . .~. . .. . ..~................ . .--
0.0 - .- . S- Sa a - .a 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power - 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40M0 0.868 0M687 40,0 0.840 50,0 0.897 70..0 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 Page 71 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-1c. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 - S fl S- *- S 1.0 S.50.0% Flow 0.6 U. .. .. ... .... -- ---- . ........
..J 0.4 ........
.. . .i . . ...;.... .. ... ...... .... ......... ..........
0.2 ..
0..0 - I - S S S 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power 6 00.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0..592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0,840 50,0 0.897 70-0 0.995 85.0 0,999 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 Page 72 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE. 8.3-1d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 1 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 - I - I 1.0 0000 08 ..
50.0% Flo*, '
- 0-6 LL
.....-*~0% Flo:
i-r
-j 0.4 .........
0.2 .............
0.0 ...... - J .
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
- 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70..0 0.995 85.0 _ 0999 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 Page 73 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-2a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACP)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 U-
_J 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0-745 0.592 40.0 0-868 0.687 40.0 0.840 60.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 36.0 0.999 90.0 1.000
- 100.0 1 1.000 Page 74 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-2b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 12 1.0 -
0.8 ..
()
L&.
0.6 - >50% Ftow
-J 0.4 ............
021 --..------- ---
0.0 - p- S I - P 9 I - p-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
- 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0..592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40,0 0.840 50,0 0.897 70..0 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 1,000 Page 75 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-2c. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2
... ..... ... , ...... ... .. . .. ... .. . ..... ' ............. 1......... ... ... . . .... .......
10 08 4 LL 0A6 0.2 ------ ----
4' --
0,0 - ,- - -
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power 6 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0..592 40.0 0,848 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 85,0 _ 0.999 90.0 _ 1,000 100.0 _1,000 Page 76 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-2d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 2 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1.0
.. ..... .5 b.... .. . F ... .....
0.8 0j6 U
C,-
0.4 .
0.2 --------------
0.0 - I - S U- U- S I - I - I -
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power !9 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0,848 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0-897 70..0 0.995 85,0 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 1,000 Page 77 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-3a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER ILHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 - . S * .- .
1.0 I .---.... I....;...
0.8 s50.0%/ FIo'Y 0-6 U ...
. - ---------4------- -
i50%,l Flo!W ----------------- --
......... .. ..... .. . . .I .
,-I ---------------------- ............ -------------------
0A ---------------------4--------- - -- - - -- - - --- ----- - ---- -- --
0.2 .. .
0.0 - - Y P -, q 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power 5010%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0-745 0-592 40.0 0..868 0-687 40.0 0.688 5060 0.738 70.0 0.820 86.0 0.869 90..0 1.000 100.0 1.000 Page 78 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-3b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1.0 -------------
0,8 ....
5- 50.0% Flo~v 03 40ý6 ------------
-J 0.4 ...
0.2 --------------
0.0 a 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power < 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70..0 0.820 85.0 _0869 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 Page 79 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-3c. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 F
1.0 0.8 2- 5b.0% Flow
.- J....
...i .....
L.
06 Fto'w ........0%
0.4 ....
0-2 ------------
I ------------
0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power 9 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >60% Flow 23.8 0.739 0-592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 0.818 85.0 0.869 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 Page 80 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-3d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 3 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1.0 .. . .. ...............
.I I---------------
0.8 ....
50.0% Flow dE 0.6-L. ---->50% FIoKY -----------------------
C,,,
(.1, -- --------------
I------------------------ ------- ......
.-4 a 0.4 .. ...
02 4-.. ----------------------- ------ --------------
0.0 - - p p- p-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power S 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70-0 0.618 85.0 0.869 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 Page 81 of 107 LAR-201 5-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-4a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 1.0 -
- ii ,,.... .*.... ....
0.8 0 w - ~ .5 ~..
C-.
0.6 I. ...." ......
X0 o! =
,-J 0.4 ......--------------- ----
0.2 4... .... ................
0.0 I I I I 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power
- 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0..868 0..687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 86.0 0.999 90..0 1.000 100.0 1.000 Page 82 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-4b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION; 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1..0 0.8- ..... ............
~s5?J.O
. ............ .. .!. . . . . . . .i. .
0.6 1-, )50 Cy,
= ...........
0.4 0.2 -
0..0 I S ml I 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power . 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0..592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70..0 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 Page 83 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-4c. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 a
1.0 J
0..8 4 ....
s50. 0% Flo.W 4-------------
...... 0%Flow
,. 0-6 -1 - - ----- ---------------
= ...
-i- -- ---------- -------- -----
0.4 ..
0.2 1.1--,--.
0.0 I - I I - I - I - P I - W-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power 9 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40,0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 Page 84 of 107 LAR-201 5-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-4d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 4 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 10 0.8
.4 .......... ..........
U.
- 0. ...... .. . . .... . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. ------
,4 - .
0.2 0.0 , -, ~ - p 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power !950.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0..592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 Page 85 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-5a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 12 - . .- . S 1.0 0.8 .........
....... .4 50.0% Flo'w V
0.6 4 .- 5.*o%
Flow .........
-- I 0.4 ........
0.2 0,0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power
- 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0J45 0.592 40.0 0.868 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70.0 0.995 85.0 0.999 90..0 1.000 100.0 1 1.000 Page 86 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-5b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1_0 038
- 50.0% FldoN U. S0.6 ............
,LL C, ------------
0.4 ..
0.2 ......
0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power . 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40,0 0,868 0,687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70..0 0.995 85.0 ______ 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 Page 87 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-5c. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 12 1.0
...... .... .. r . .... ...
'i i
0.8 150.0% Floaw 0
'. 06 . .50%-Floiv ---
-r ........ ................ ... ................ ....
0.4 - .... .................
0.2 4 -------------
0.0 -. - q-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
- 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0..592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.840 50.0 0.897 70..0 0.995 85.0 0.999 90,0 1O000 100..0 1.000 Page 88 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-5d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 5 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 108 000-0.8 L 50. 0% Flow -
... Fo .*w IL 0
z~1 0.4 0.2 ----------
0.0 - I - U I q 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power S 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0-739 0..592 40.0 0.848 0M687 40.0 0,840 50.0 0.897 70..0 0.995 85.0 0.999 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 Page 89 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-6a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1,.2 - .- . .-
1.0 - .......
. 9......>..
-I...
0.8 50.0% FloW
'*0.6 U. ýý50%- HOW'
%F ..........
o.5 0A 0.2 0.0
- I - I U - I - I S - P- I -
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power 5010%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0..868 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 0.820 85.0 0.869 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 Page 90 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 1.0 0.8 0..6
-J 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%Rated)
Power 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0,8681 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0,738 70.0 0.820 85.0 0..869 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 Page 91 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 - I I I I -
1.0 ----------- ...... -------
0.8 1.. - --------- -----------
- 50.0% FIo S0 ..........
>50% Flo IL W1 ---------- ------------ .............
0.4 1 ... . .. . .. .. .. .
0.2 . .. .... . .. . ... . . ..
... ... . * ... ..... . . . . .. ..I .....................
0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power S 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.688 500 0.738 70.0 0.818 85 0 0.869 90.0 1,000 100i0 1.000 Page 92 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-6d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 6 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GHF3 1.2
~1.1-
.... . . . .. .. ... ...: .. . . ..... o. ý . -. .. ' ... . . . . .. . .. ....-..: . ... . ... . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .!. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . -- ----..
.......... '.I..'....' .. , ' ' 7 "*........... . ' , " 7 ' " 7 "; 2 *' ; * . * " ' ' " i........ ;.. *. ..... "; .. " * * ;* * ;"
0.9 ::: *..
.......... ... 0 0% F..;
- f ':: :' :::.- .. ..: . ':...... ........ ! ::::"" -
0.8 0.7 4
0-06. ..... . ... .... .. --....-- .... . .. .. .... ....... .. .....--
U.
= 0.5
-- I ...... .. . .. ... ............*.. . .. .. ...... ..; . .... ...... . ............
.. ... . ... .. ... . .. . ..1. .. . . . . . .. . . . ..... ..... ......... .. ... .. . . . . . . ... .. . . . . . .. .. . . ........... ....
0.4 .... ....................... ... .. . ... . . . .... . . . . . . . . . .i. .. . . .. . . . . .. . . ... .... . ......... . .. . . . . . . . .... .. ........... ........
0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power
- 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0,738 70-0 0.818 85.0 0_869 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 Page 93 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-7a. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 106 0.4 ............
08 0.
S0.6
-J 0.0-0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power f 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.745 0.592 40.0 0-868 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 0.820 85.0 0.869 90..0 1.000 100.0 1.000 Page 94 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE. 8.3-7b. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: BOC TO MOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 - . I U 10 - .....
0.8 ...........
- 5b.0% FloW~
U. - -------------
S0.- )50% F1.6
-J-0.4-0.2 1 ............ ...........
0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power ! 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.746 0.592 40.0 0.868 0,687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0-738 70.0 0.820 85.0 0.869 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 Page 95 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-7c. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF2 1.2 1.0 ...........
-- - ----- I .. . I - -,
0.83 T.
50.0% Flow U. ............
.................... .. 0.........
0.4 0.2 -.- -----
0.0 -... .. 9 9 -I 0 10 .20 30 40 50 60 70 8o 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power -. 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow
.23.8 0.739 0.592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 0.818 85.0 0.869 90,0 1.000 100.0 1.000 Page 96 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 FIGURE 8.3-7d. OPERATING LIMIT LHGRFAC VERSUS CORE POWER (LHGRFACp)
APPLICATION CONDITION: 7 EXPOSURE RANGE: MOC TO EOC FUEL TYPE: GNF3 1.2 .- I 1.0 4-- .........
0.8 L 5~0.0% Flow U. 0-6 4
>5%Fo C,. 0I" 0,4 ............
0.2 -. ...
---------------- 1 -----------
0.0 -I - I 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% Rated)
Power S 50.0%
(% Rated) Flow >50% Flow 23.8 0.739 0592 40.0 0.848 0.687 40.0 0.688 50.0 0.738 70.0 0.818 85.0 ______ 0.869 90.0 1.000 100.0 1.000 Page 97 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 Figure 9.1-1: Monitored Region Boundary (Case 1) 120 110 100 90 80 3 60 ,
0 w
0.
40o___
o30 20____ ____
10 ____ ___ ___
0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 CORE FLOW (% rated)
Page 98 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 Figure 9.1-2: Monitored Region Boundary (Case 2) 120 110 100 90 w 80 a..
- 70 W 60 0
- 0. 50 w
o040 30 20 10 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 CORE FLOW (% rated)
Page 99 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 Figure 9.1-3: APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted Region Boundary (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1) 120 110 +
100 +
90 4 80 M - Nominal Value 70 - Allowable Value 60 S.-- ---- ------- --------- 0 TLO Restricted Region "
0 Boundary High Endpoint
- 0. . . ....-, - -- -- -- .--. . --
. ..- Se tu - ------. .
LU 50 0 N Non-Setup Scram 40 RR Restricted Region 30 --
S-RR-------- .-..-------
20 10 a
0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 ALIGNED DRIVE FLOW (% rated)
Page 100 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 Figure 9.1-4: APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted Region Boundary (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2)
---. .L - --
-8i i-- Nonul Value I I - .o able Value Ix~ThO Restncted Revion U, 6 80.
0~ 40 N -: ---1
'°-!
....... * .....*........i .......*..... ................ ...
0 I I0 I0 I T s I I I 0 20' ' 1 ' 4 50' J T 80' 0 ¶0 10 ¶2, AUGNED DRIVE FLOW (% rated)
Page 101 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 Figure 9.1-5: APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted Region Boundary (Single Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1) 120 110 I
100 90 80 + - Nominal Value 2__
t I...i
- Allowable Value 70 0 SLO Restricted Region w 60 + Boundary High Endpoint 0 S Setup Scram a.
50 +
N Non-Setup Scram 0
U RR Restricted Region 40 30 20 10 I 0 I 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 ALIGNED DRIVE FLOW (% rated)
Page 102 of 107 LARo2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 Figure 9.1-6: APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High Scram Setpoints and Restricted Region Boundary (Single Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2)
'0 0-0 U
0 10 20 30 40 10 60 70 80 90 100 110 t20 ALIGNED DRVE FLOW (% rated)
Page 103 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 Figure 9.1-7: APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1)
W 0
0.
0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 ALIGNED DRIVE FLOW (% rated)
Page 104 of 107 LAR-201 5-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 Figure 9.1-8: APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Two Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2) 120 110 t0o 740 w *o 0:w50 0
U 40 20 10 0 10 20 .10 40 so 60 70 80 00 100 110 120 ALIGNED DRIVE FLOW (% rated)
Page 105 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 Figure 9.1-9: APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Set points (Single Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 1) 0 w
0 U.
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 ALIGNED DRIVE FLOW (% rated)
Page 106 of 107 LAR-2015-01
River Bend Station Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 19 Revision 0 Figure 9.1-10: APRM Flow Biased Neutron Flux - High Rod-Block Setpoints (Single Recirculation Loop Operation - Case 2) 120
-.. ..*I-.... I
,,o~~~~~~~~~ ii
~~~~
F I
-. , .. I ---I 0 I a7-0 0 40 ---
. ... 7 ...
0 10 20 40 A0 so R0 (070 90 100 110 120 ALIGNED DRIVE FLOW (%rated)
Page 107 of 107 LAR-2015-01