ML12258A009: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML12258A009
| number = ML12258A009
| issue date = 09/13/2012
| issue date = 09/13/2012
| title = 2012/09/13 NRR E-mail Capture - St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Station--Acceptance Review Regarding License Amendment Request Regarding Battery Surveillance Requirement Changes (TAC Nos. ME9297 and ME9298)
| title = NRR E-mail Capture - St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Station--Acceptance Review Regarding License Amendment Request Regarding Battery Surveillance Requirement Changes
| author name = Orf T J
| author name = Orf T
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-2
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-2
| addressee name = Frehafer K
| addressee name = Frehafer K
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Orf, TracySent:Thursday, September 13, 2012 9:55 AMTo:Frehafer, KenSubject:St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Station--Acceptance Review Regarding License Amendment Request Regarding Battery Surveillance Requirement Changes (TAC Nos. ME9297 and ME9298)Dear Mr. Frehafer, By letter dated August 10, 2012, Florida Power and Light Company submitted a license amendment request for St. Lucie, Units 1 and 2. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:                       Orf, Tracy Sent:                       Thursday, September 13, 2012 9:55 AM To:                         Frehafer, Ken
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.


If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Tracy J. Orf, Project Manager St. Lucie Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Phone: (301) 415-2788 Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 471   Mail Envelope Properties   (Tracy.Orf@nrc.gov20120913095400)  
==Subject:==
St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Station--Acceptance Review Regarding License Amendment Request Regarding Battery Surveillance Requirement Changes (TAC Nos. ME9297 and ME9298)
 
==Dear Mr. Frehafer,==
 
By letter dated August 10, 2012, Florida Power and Light Company submitted a license amendment request for St. Lucie, Units 1 and 2. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely, Tracy J. Orf, Project Manager St. Lucie Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Phone: (301) 415-2788 1
 
Hearing Identifier:   NRR_PMDA Email Number:         471 Mail Envelope Properties     (Tracy.Orf@nrc.gov20120913095400)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Station--Acceptance Review Regarding License Amendment Request Regarding Battery Surveillance Requirement Changes (TAC Nos. ME9297 and ME9298)
St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Station--Acceptance Review Regarding License Amendment Request Regarding Battery Surveillance Requirement Changes (TAC Nos. ME9297 and ME9298)
Sent Date:   9/13/2012 9:54:30 AM Received Date: 9/13/2012 9:54:00 AM From:   Orf, Tracy Created By:   Tracy.Orf@nrc.gov Recipients:     "Frehafer, Ken" <Ken.Frehafer@fpl.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office:     Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   1745     9/13/2012 9:54:00 AM Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:      
Sent Date:             9/13/2012 9:54:30 AM Received Date:         9/13/2012 9:54:00 AM From:                 Orf, Tracy Created By:           Tracy.Orf@nrc.gov Recipients:
}}
"Frehafer, Ken" <Ken.Frehafer@fpl.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files                           Size                     Date & Time MESSAGE                         1745                     9/13/2012 9:54:00 AM Options Priority:                       Standard Return Notification:           No Reply Requested:               No Sensitivity:                   Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:}}

Latest revision as of 12:40, 20 March 2020

NRR E-mail Capture - St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Station--Acceptance Review Regarding License Amendment Request Regarding Battery Surveillance Requirement Changes
ML12258A009
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/13/2012
From: Orf T
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Frehafer K
Florida Power & Light Co
References
TAC ME9297, TAC ME9298
Download: ML12258A009 (2)
v • d • e


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Orf, Tracy Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 9:55 AM To: Frehafer, Ken

Subject:

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Station--Acceptance Review Regarding License Amendment Request Regarding Battery Surveillance Requirement Changes (TAC Nos. ME9297 and ME9298)

Dear Mr. Frehafer,

By letter dated August 10, 2012, Florida Power and Light Company submitted a license amendment request for St. Lucie, Units 1 and 2. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Sincerely, Tracy J. Orf, Project Manager St. Lucie Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Phone: (301) 415-2788 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 471 Mail Envelope Properties (Tracy.Orf@nrc.gov20120913095400)

Subject:

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Station--Acceptance Review Regarding License Amendment Request Regarding Battery Surveillance Requirement Changes (TAC Nos. ME9297 and ME9298)

Sent Date: 9/13/2012 9:54:30 AM Received Date: 9/13/2012 9:54:00 AM From: Orf, Tracy Created By: Tracy.Orf@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Frehafer, Ken" <Ken.Frehafer@fpl.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1745 9/13/2012 9:54:00 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12258A009&oldid=2639118"