ML14352A016: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML14352A016 | | number = ML14352A016 | ||
| issue date = 12/17/2014 | | issue date = 12/17/2014 | ||
| title = | | title = NRR E-mail Capture - SONGS Units 1, 2 and 3 - Acceptance Review of Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program | ||
| author name = Wengert T | | author name = Wengert T | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV-2 | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV-2 | ||
| addressee name = Sterdis A | | addressee name = Sterdis A | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Wengert, Thomas Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 2:02 PM To: andrea.sterdis@sce.com Cc: mark.morgan@sce.com; John.Brabec@sce.com; Broaddus, Doug; Kavanagh, Kerri; Keim, Andrea; Vaaler, Marlayna; Watson, Bruce | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of this request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC | |||
==Subject:== | |||
SONGS Units 1, 2 and 3 - Acceptance Review of Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program (TAC Nos. MF5215, MF5216, and MF5217) | |||
By letter dated November 13, 2014 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) | |||
Accession No. ML14322A157), Southern California Edison (SCE) submitted a proposed revision to the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Quality Assurance Program (QAP) for review and approval by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), since it involves aspects that are considered reductions in commitments. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the NRC staffs acceptance review of the submittal. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | |||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of this request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | |||
Note that, because the NRC staff has accepted this application for review and will be performing a detailed review of this request, the 60-day period referenced in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.54(a)(4)(iv) is not applicable. Accordingly, SCE can implement reductions in commitments only after the NRC staff has completed its review and issued a safety evaluation. | Note that, because the NRC staff has accepted this application for review and will be performing a detailed review of this request, the 60-day period referenced in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.54(a)(4)(iv) is not applicable. Accordingly, SCE can implement reductions in commitments only after the NRC staff has completed its review and issued a safety evaluation. | ||
If you have any questions, please contact me. | If you have any questions, please contact me. | ||
Tom Wengert Senior Project Manager - San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRR/DORL/LPL4-2 (301) 415-4037 1 | |||
Tom Wengert Senior Project Manager - San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRR/DORL/LPL4-2 (301) 415-4037 | |||
Hearing Identifier: | Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 1778 Mail Envelope Properties (Thomas.Wengert@nrc.gov20141217140100) | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
SONGS Units 1, 2 and 3 - Acceptance Review of Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program (TAC Nos. MF5215, MF5216, and MF5217) | SONGS Units 1, 2 and 3 - Acceptance Review of Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program (TAC Nos. MF5215, MF5216, and MF5217) | ||
Tracking Status: None | Sent Date: 12/17/2014 2:01:31 PM Received Date: 12/17/2014 2:01:00 PM From: Wengert, Thomas Created By: Thomas.Wengert@nrc.gov Recipients: | ||
Tracking Status: None | "mark.morgan@sce.com" <mark.morgan@sce.com> | ||
}} | Tracking Status: None "John.Brabec@sce.com" <John.Brabec@sce.com> | ||
Tracking Status: None "Broaddus, Doug" <Doug.Broaddus@nrc.gov> | |||
Tracking Status: None "Kavanagh, Kerri" <Kerri.Kavanagh@nrc.gov> | |||
Tracking Status: None "Keim, Andrea" <Andrea.Keim@nrc.gov> | |||
Tracking Status: None "Vaaler, Marlayna" <Marlayna.Vaaler@nrc.gov> | |||
Tracking Status: None "Watson, Bruce" <Bruce.Watson@nrc.gov> | |||
Tracking Status: None "andrea.sterdis@sce.com" <andrea.sterdis@sce.com> | |||
Tracking Status: None Post Office: | |||
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2296 12/17/2014 2:01:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: | |||
Recipients Received:}} | |||
Latest revision as of 16:27, 19 March 2020
| ML14352A016 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 12/17/2014 |
| From: | Thomas Wengert Plant Licensing Branch IV |
| To: | Sterdis A Southern California Edison Co |
| References | |
| TAC MF5215, TAC MF5216, TAC MF5217 | |
| Download: ML14352A016 (2) | |
Text
NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Wengert, Thomas Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 2:02 PM To: andrea.sterdis@sce.com Cc: mark.morgan@sce.com; John.Brabec@sce.com; Broaddus, Doug; Kavanagh, Kerri; Keim, Andrea; Vaaler, Marlayna; Watson, Bruce
Subject:
SONGS Units 1, 2 and 3 - Acceptance Review of Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program (TAC Nos. MF5215, MF5216, and MF5217)
By letter dated November 13, 2014 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)
Accession No. ML14322A157), Southern California Edison (SCE) submitted a proposed revision to the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Quality Assurance Program (QAP) for review and approval by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), since it involves aspects that are considered reductions in commitments. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the NRC staffs acceptance review of the submittal. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of this request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Note that, because the NRC staff has accepted this application for review and will be performing a detailed review of this request, the 60-day period referenced in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.54(a)(4)(iv) is not applicable. Accordingly, SCE can implement reductions in commitments only after the NRC staff has completed its review and issued a safety evaluation.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Tom Wengert Senior Project Manager - San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRR/DORL/LPL4-2 (301) 415-4037 1
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 1778 Mail Envelope Properties (Thomas.Wengert@nrc.gov20141217140100)
Subject:
SONGS Units 1, 2 and 3 - Acceptance Review of Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program (TAC Nos. MF5215, MF5216, and MF5217)
Sent Date: 12/17/2014 2:01:31 PM Received Date: 12/17/2014 2:01:00 PM From: Wengert, Thomas Created By: Thomas.Wengert@nrc.gov Recipients:
"mark.morgan@sce.com" <mark.morgan@sce.com>
Tracking Status: None "John.Brabec@sce.com" <John.Brabec@sce.com>
Tracking Status: None "Broaddus, Doug" <Doug.Broaddus@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Kavanagh, Kerri" <Kerri.Kavanagh@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Keim, Andrea" <Andrea.Keim@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Vaaler, Marlayna" <Marlayna.Vaaler@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Watson, Bruce" <Bruce.Watson@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "andrea.sterdis@sce.com" <andrea.sterdis@sce.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2296 12/17/2014 2:01:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: