ML062000152: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:August 2, 2006Mr. Jeffrey S. ForbesSite Vice President Arkansas Nuclear One Entergy Operations, Inc.
{{#Wiki_filter:August 2, 2006 Mr. Jeffrey S. Forbes Site Vice President Arkansas Nuclear One Entergy Operations, Inc.
1448 S. R. 333 Russellville, AR 72801
1448 S. R. 333 Russellville, AR 72801


Line 26: Line 26:
==Dear Mr. Forbes:==
==Dear Mr. Forbes:==


The Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 265 to Facility Operating LicenseNo. NPF-6 for ANO-2. The amendment consists of changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) in response to your application dated September 19, 2005.The amendment will modify ANO-2 Surveillance Requirement TS 3.1.1.4, "ModeratorTemperature Coefficient," and will allow the use of WCAP-16011-P-A, "Startup Test ActivityReduction Program."A copy of our related Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. The Notice of Issuance will beincluded in the Commission's next biweekly Federal Register notice.Sincerely,/RA/Drew G. Holland, Project ManagerPlant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationDocket No. 50-368
The Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 265 to Facility Operating License No. NPF-6 for ANO-2. The amendment consists of changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) in response to your application dated September 19, 2005.
The amendment will modify ANO-2 Surveillance Requirement TS 3.1.1.4, Moderator Temperature Coefficient, and will allow the use of WCAP-16011-P-A, Startup Test Activity Reduction Program.
A copy of our related Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. The Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commission's next biweekly Federal Register notice.
Sincerely,
                                            /RA/
Drew G. Holland, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-368


==Enclosures:==
==Enclosures:==
: 1. Amendment No. 265 to NPF-62. Safety Evaluationcc w/encls:See next page  
: 1. Amendment No. 265 to NPF-6
: 2. Safety Evaluation cc w/encls:   See next page


Pkg ML062160317 (ML062000152, TS pgs ML062160468)OFFICENRR/LPL4/PMNRR/LPL4/LANRR/SPWB/BCOGC: NLONRR/LPL4/BCNAMEDHollandLFeizollahiJNakoskiSHamrickDTeraoDATE7/24/067/20/066/9/067/25/067/28/06 ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.DOCKET NO. 50-368ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE, UNIT NO. 2AMENDMENT TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSEAmendment No. 265             Renewed License No. NPF-61.The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:A.The application for amendment by Entergy Operations, Inc. (the licensee), datedSeptember 19, 2005, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I;B.The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of theAct, and the rules and regulations of the Commission;C.There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by thisamendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with theCommission's regulations;D.The issuance of this license amendment will not be inimical to the commondefense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E.The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of theCommission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied. 2.Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications asindicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-6.3.The license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implementedwithin 30 days from the date of issuance.FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION/RA/David Terao, ChiefPlant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Pkg ML062160317 (ML062000152, TS pgs ML062160468)
OFFICE        NRR/LPL4/PM      NRR/LPL4/LA        NRR/SPWB/BC      OGC: NLO        NRR/LPL4/BC NAME          DHolland        LFeizollahi        JNakoski        SHamrick        DTerao DATE          7/24/06          7/20/06            6/9/06          7/25/06          7/28/06 ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.
DOCKET NO. 50-368 ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE, UNIT NO. 2 AMENDMENT TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 265 Renewed License No. NPF-6
: 1. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:
A. The application for amendment by Entergy Operations, Inc. (the licensee), dated September 19, 2005, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B. The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C. There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; D. The issuance of this license amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E. The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.
: 2. Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-6.
: 3. The license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implemented within 30 days from the date of issuance.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
                                              /RA/
David Terao, Chief Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation


==Attachment:==
==Attachment:==
Changes to the Technical   Specifications and Facility Operating LicenseDate of Issuance: August 2, 2006 ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 265RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-6DOCKET NO. 50-368Replace page 3 of the Facility Operating License with the attached revised page 3.Replace the following page of the Appendix A Technical Specifications with the attached revisedpage. The revised page is identified by an amendment number and contains marginal lines indicating the areas of change. RemoveInsert3/4 1-53/4 1-5 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIONRELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 265 TORENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-6ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE, UNIT NO. 2DOCKET NO. 50-36
Changes to the Technical Specifications and Facility Operating License Date of Issuance: August 2, 2006


==81.0INTRODUCTION==
ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 265 RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-6 DOCKET NO. 50-368 Replace page 3 of the Facility Operating License with the attached revised page 3.
By letter dated September 19, 2006 (Reference 1), Entergy Operations, Inc. (Entergy) requestedan amendment to the Operating License and Technical Specifications (TSs) for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2 (ANO-2). The request will modify ANO-2 Surveillance Requirement TS 3.1.1.4,"Moderator Temperature Coefficient" (MTC), utilizing WCAP-16011-P-A, "Startup Test ActivityReduction [(STAR)] Program" (Reference 2). The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)staff's original proposed no significant hazards consideration determination was published in theFederal Register on December 6, 2005 (70 FR 72671). WCAP-16011-P-A describes methods to reduce the time required for startup testing. To this end, WCAP-16011-P-A proposes methods to eliminate the control element assembly (CEA) worth and isothermal temperature coefficient (ITC) measurements at hot zero power (HZP).
Replace the following page of the Appendix A Technical Specifications with the attached revised page. The revised page is identified by an amendment number and contains marginal lines indicating the areas of change.
WCAP-16011-P-A includes a method to substitute the measured value of the MTC at HZP with an alternate MTC value consisting of the predicted (calculated) MTC and measured critical boron concentration (CBC) at HZP. WCAP-16011-P-A adds an ITC measurement at intermediate to hot full power, and applicability requirements for core design, fabrication, refueling, startup testing,and CEA lifetime viability requirements. WCAP-16011-P-A methods can only be applied to coresthat are well characterized by an existing database. In Reference 1, the licensee has only requested to substitute the measured value of the MTC atHZP with an alternate MTC value consisting of the predicted (calculated) MTC and measured CBC at HZP. Therefore, the NRC staff's review was limited to this sc ope.
Remove                    Insert 3/4 1-5                    3/4 1-5


==2.0REGULATORY EVALUATION==
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 265 TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-6 ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.
The regulations (Part 50 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR Part 50)) do notexplicitly prescribe specific post-refueling startup testing. However, the genesis for post-refueling startup testing can be traced to the preoperational testing required to be specified in the final safety analysis report by 10 CFR 50.34. Section 50.36 of 10 CFR specifies surveillancerequirements relating to test, calibration, or inspection to assure that the necessary quality of systems and components is maintained, that facility operation will be within safety limits, and thatthe limiting conditions for operation will be met. Part 50 of 10 CFR, Appendix A, "General Design  Criteria" (GDC), apply, in that the GDCs establish the necessary design, fabrication, construction,testing, and performance requirements for structures, systems, and components important tosafety. Accordingly, the MTC is a parameter controlled in the licensee's TS, including surveillance requirements. As a value in the TS, MTC and the applicable surveillance requirements are subjectto regulatory oversight.
ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE, UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-368


==3.0TECHNICAL EVALUATION==
==1.0      INTRODUCTION==
As stated previously WCAP-16011-P-A describes methods to reduce the time required for startuptesting. The NRC-approved WCAP-16011-P-A on January 14, 2005, for referencing in licenseapplications to the extent specified and under the limitations stated in the topical report and theNRC safety evaluation (SE). Since the NRC staff found the report acceptable, the review of thelicensee's September 19, 2005, application was to ensure that WCAP-16011-P-A is applicable toANO-2 and that WCAP-16011-P-A is being implemented appropriately.Entergy has only requested a partial implementation of WCAP-16011-P-A for ANO-2, that portionthat replaces the current MTC Surveillance with an MTC Alternate Surveillance. However, the NRC's SE and WCAP-16011-P-A make no differentiation between the limitations, conditions, andrequirements for partial or full implementation. Nor has the licensee's application requested anydifferentiation of the limitations, conditions, or requirements for its partial implementation. Therefore, the licensee's partial implementation of WCAP-16011-P-A requires the full acceptanceof the limitations, conditions, and requirements specified in the NRC's SE and WCAP-16011-P-A.In the SE for WCAP-16011-P-A, the NRC identified three conditions and limitations for theapplication of WCAP-16011-P-A to individual licensees.1.The STAR program is applicable only to the participating plants as defined in Table 3-1 ofWCAP-16011-P-A.2.Should any of the STAR test results fall outside of the test criteria, either ascertain that thesafety analysis and STAR applicability requirements are satisfied, or discontinue use of theSTAR program for that fuel cycle.3.The Staff requires each licensee using STAR to submit a summary report following the firstapplication, either successful or not, of STAR to its plant. The report should (a) identify the core design method used, (b) compare the measured and calculated values and the differences between these values to the corresponding core design method uncertainties and show compliance with the STAR applicability requirements. If the application of STARis unsuccessful, identify the reasons why the STAR application failed.With respect to these conditions and limitations, the licensee meets the first as ANO-2 is includedin Table 3-1 of WCAP-16011-P-A. The licensee meets the second and third items as licensing commitments. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that WCAP-16011-P-A is applicable to ANO-2 and that WCAP-16011-P-A is being implemented appropriately.The NRC staff reviewed the licensee's license amendment request (LAR) reports submitted byEntergy, to support ANO-2 TS change to modify ANO-2 SR 4.1.1.4.1 and 4.1.1.4.2 to allow theuse of WCAP-16011-P-A. Based on this review, the NRC staff concludes that appropriatedocumentation was submitted and that the proposed changes satisfy the staff positions and  requirements in these areas. Therefore, on the basis of the above review and justification, theNRC staff concludes that the proposed changes to the TS are acceptable.


==4.0STATE CONSULTATION==
By letter dated September 19, 2006 (Reference 1), Entergy Operations, Inc. (Entergy) requested an amendment to the Operating License and Technical Specifications (TSs) for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2 (ANO-2). The request will modify ANO-2 Surveillance Requirement TS 3.1.1.4, Moderator Temperature Coefficient (MTC), utilizing WCAP-16011-P-A, Startup Test Activity Reduction [(STAR)] Program (Reference 2). The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's original proposed no significant hazards consideration determination was published in the Federal Register on December 6, 2005 (70 FR 72671).
In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Arkansas State official was notified of theproposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments.
WCAP-16011-P-A describes methods to reduce the time required for startup testing. To this end, WCAP-16011-P-A proposes methods to eliminate the control element assembly (CEA) worth and isothermal temperature coefficient (ITC) measurements at hot zero power (HZP).
WCAP-16011-P-A includes a method to substitute the measured value of the MTC at HZP with an alternate MTC value consisting of the predicted (calculated) MTC and measured critical boron concentration (CBC) at HZP. WCAP-16011-P-A adds an ITC measurement at intermediate to hot full power, and applicability requirements for core design, fabrication, refueling, startup testing, and CEA lifetime viability requirements. WCAP-16011-P-A methods can only be applied to cores that are well characterized by an existing database.
In Reference 1, the licensee has only requested to substitute the measured value of the MTC at HZP with an alternate MTC value consisting of the predicted (calculated) MTC and measured CBC at HZP. Therefore, the NRC staffs review was limited to this scope.


==5.0ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION==
==2.0      REGULATORY EVALUATION==
The amendment changes a requirement with respect to installation or use of a facility com ponentlocated within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20. The NRC staff has determinedthat the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change inthe types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase inindividual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration, and therehas been no public comment on such finding published December 6, 2005 (70 FR 72671).
Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment.


==6.0CONCLUSION==
The regulations (Part 50 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR Part 50)) do not explicitly prescribe specific post-refueling startup testing. However, the genesis for post-refueling startup testing can be traced to the preoperational testing required to be specified in the final safety analysis report by 10 CFR 50.34. Section 50.36 of 10 CFR specifies surveillance requirements relating to test, calibration, or inspection to assure that the necessary quality of systems and components is maintained, that facility operation will be within safety limits, and that the limiting conditions for operation will be met. Part 50 of 10 CFR, Appendix A, General Design
The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:  (1) there isreasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operationin the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission'sregulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be adverse to the common defenseand security or to the health and safety of the public.  


==7.0REFERENCES==
Criteria (GDC), apply, in that the GDCs establish the necessary design, fabrication, construction, testing, and performance requirements for structures, systems, and components important to safety. Accordingly, the MTC is a parameter controlled in the licensees TS, including surveillance requirements. As a value in the TS, MTC and the applicable surveillance requirements are subject to regulatory oversight.
4.Letter from Jeffery S. Forbes, Arkansas Nuclear One, to U.S. NRC, Re: "LicenseAmendment Request to Modify Technical Specification 3.1.1.4, Surveillance Requirementsas Allowed by WCAP-16011-P-A, Startup Test Activity Reduction Program, Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2, Docket No. 50-368, License No. NPF-6," dated September 19, 2005,Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML052760278.5.WCAP-16011-P-A, "Startup Test Activity Reduction Program," dated February 2005. ADAMS Accession No. ML050660118 (Nonproprietary version).Principal Contributor:  K. Wood Date: August 2, 2006 September 2005Arkansas Nuclear One cc: Senior Vice President
  & Chief Operating Officer Entergy Operations, Inc.
P. O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS  39286-1995Director, Division of Radiation  Control and Emergency Management Arkansas Department of Health 4815 West Markham Street, Slot 30 Little Rock, AR  72205-3867Winston & Strawn1700 K Street, N.W.
Washington, DC  20006-3817Senior Resident InspectorU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission


P. O. Box 310 London, AR  72847Regional Administrator, Region IV U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX  76011-8064County Judge of Pope County Pope County Courthouse Russellville, AR 72801Vice President, Operations SupportEntergy Operations, Inc.
==3.0      TECHNICAL EVALUATION==
P. O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS 39286-1995Wise, Carter, Child & Caraway P. O. Box 651 Jackson, MS 39205}}
 
As stated previously WCAP-16011-P-A describes methods to reduce the time required for startup testing. The NRC-approved WCAP-16011-P-A on January 14, 2005, for referencing in license applications to the extent specified and under the limitations stated in the topical report and the NRC safety evaluation (SE). Since the NRC staff found the report acceptable, the review of the licensees September 19, 2005, application was to ensure that WCAP-16011-P-A is applicable to ANO-2 and that WCAP-16011-P-A is being implemented appropriately.
Entergy has only requested a partial implementation of WCAP-16011-P-A for ANO-2, that portion that replaces the current MTC Surveillance with an MTC Alternate Surveillance. However, the NRCs SE and WCAP-16011-P-A make no differentiation between the limitations, conditions, and requirements for partial or full implementation. Nor has the licensees application requested any differentiation of the limitations, conditions, or requirements for its partial implementation.
Therefore, the licensees partial implementation of WCAP-16011-P-A requires the full acceptance of the limitations, conditions, and requirements specified in the NRCs SE and WCAP-16011-P-A.
In the SE for WCAP-16011-P-A, the NRC identified three conditions and limitations for the application of WCAP-16011-P-A to individual licensees.
: 1.      The STAR program is applicable only to the participating plants as defined in Table 3-1 of WCAP-16011-P-A.
: 2.      Should any of the STAR test results fall outside of the test criteria, either ascertain that the safety analysis and STAR applicability requirements are satisfied, or discontinue use of the STAR program for that fuel cycle.
: 3.      The Staff requires each licensee using STAR to submit a summary report following the first application, either successful or not, of STAR to its plant. The report should (a) identify the core design method used, (b) compare the measured and calculated values and the differences between these values to the corresponding core design method uncertainties and show compliance with the STAR applicability requirements. If the application of STAR is unsuccessful, identify the reasons why the STAR application failed.
With respect to these conditions and limitations, the licensee meets the first as ANO-2 is included in Table 3-1 of WCAP-16011-P-A. The licensee meets the second and third items as licensing commitments. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that WCAP-16011-P-A is applicable to ANO-2 and that WCAP-16011-P-A is being implemented appropriately.
The NRC staff reviewed the licensees license amendment request (LAR) reports submitted by Entergy, to support ANO-2 TS change to modify ANO-2 SR 4.1.1.4.1 and 4.1.1.4.2 to allow the use of WCAP-16011-P-A. Based on this review, the NRC staff concludes that appropriate documentation was submitted and that the proposed changes satisfy the staff positions and
 
requirements in these areas. Therefore, on the basis of the above review and justification, the NRC staff concludes that the proposed changes to the TS are acceptable.
 
==4.0    STATE CONSULTATION==
 
In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Arkansas State official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments.
 
==5.0    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION==
 
The amendment changes a requirement with respect to installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20. The NRC staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration, and there has been no public comment on such finding published December 6, 2005 (70 FR 72671).
Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment.
 
==6.0    CONCLUSION==
 
The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commissions regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be adverse to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
 
==7.0    REFERENCES==
: 4.      Letter from Jeffery S. Forbes, Arkansas Nuclear One, to U.S. NRC, Re: License Amendment Request to Modify Technical Specification 3.1.1.4, Surveillance Requirements as Allowed by WCAP-16011-P-A, Startup Test Activity Reduction Program, Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2, Docket No. 50-368, License No. NPF-6, dated September 19, 2005, Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML052760278.
: 5.      WCAP-16011-P-A, Startup Test Activity Reduction Program, dated February 2005.
ADAMS Accession No. ML050660118 (Nonproprietary version).
Principal Contributor: K. Wood Date: August 2, 2006
 
Arkansas Nuclear One cc:
Senior Vice President              Vice President, Operations Support
& Chief Operating Officer        Entergy Operations, Inc.
Entergy Operations, Inc.          P. O. Box 31995 P. O. Box 31995                    Jackson, MS 39286-1995 Jackson, MS 39286-1995 Wise, Carter, Child & Caraway Director, Division of Radiation    P. O. Box 651 Control and Emergency Management  Jackson, MS 39205 Arkansas Department of Health 4815 West Markham Street, Slot 30 Little Rock, AR 72205-3867 Winston & Strawn 1700 K Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20006-3817 Senior Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. O. Box 310 London, AR 72847 Regional Administrator, Region IV U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011-8064 County Judge of Pope County Pope County Courthouse Russellville, AR 72801 September 2005}}

Latest revision as of 02:41, 14 March 2020

Issuance of License Amendment to Modify Moderator Temperature Coefficient Surveillance Requirements
ML062000152
Person / Time
Site: Arkansas Nuclear Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 08/02/2006
From: Holland D
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIV
To: Forbes J
Entergy Operations
Holland D, NRR/DORL/LP4, 415-1436
References
TAC MC8538
Download: ML062000152 (9)


Text

August 2, 2006 Mr. Jeffrey S. Forbes Site Vice President Arkansas Nuclear One Entergy Operations, Inc.

1448 S. R. 333 Russellville, AR 72801

SUBJECT:

ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE, UNIT NO. 2 (ANO-2) RE: ISSUANCE OF LICENSE AMENDMENT TO MODIFY MODERATOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (TAC NO. MC8538)

Dear Mr. Forbes:

The Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 265 to Facility Operating License No. NPF-6 for ANO-2. The amendment consists of changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) in response to your application dated September 19, 2005.

The amendment will modify ANO-2 Surveillance Requirement TS 3.1.1.4, Moderator Temperature Coefficient, and will allow the use of WCAP-16011-P-A, Startup Test Activity Reduction Program.

A copy of our related Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. The Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commission's next biweekly Federal Register notice.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Drew G. Holland, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-368

Enclosures:

1. Amendment No. 265 to NPF-6
2. Safety Evaluation cc w/encls: See next page

Pkg ML062160317 (ML062000152, TS pgs ML062160468)

OFFICE NRR/LPL4/PM NRR/LPL4/LA NRR/SPWB/BC OGC: NLO NRR/LPL4/BC NAME DHolland LFeizollahi JNakoski SHamrick DTerao DATE 7/24/06 7/20/06 6/9/06 7/25/06 7/28/06 ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.

DOCKET NO. 50-368 ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE, UNIT NO. 2 AMENDMENT TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 265 Renewed License No. NPF-6

1. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:

A. The application for amendment by Entergy Operations, Inc. (the licensee), dated September 19, 2005, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B. The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C. There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; D. The issuance of this license amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E. The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.

2. Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-6.
3. The license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implemented within 30 days from the date of issuance.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

/RA/

David Terao, Chief Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Attachment:

Changes to the Technical Specifications and Facility Operating License Date of Issuance: August 2, 2006

ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 265 RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-6 DOCKET NO. 50-368 Replace page 3 of the Facility Operating License with the attached revised page 3.

Replace the following page of the Appendix A Technical Specifications with the attached revised page. The revised page is identified by an amendment number and contains marginal lines indicating the areas of change.

Remove Insert 3/4 1-5 3/4 1-5

SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 265 TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-6 ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.

ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE, UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-368

1.0 INTRODUCTION

By letter dated September 19, 2006 (Reference 1), Entergy Operations, Inc. (Entergy) requested an amendment to the Operating License and Technical Specifications (TSs) for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2 (ANO-2). The request will modify ANO-2 Surveillance Requirement TS 3.1.1.4, Moderator Temperature Coefficient (MTC), utilizing WCAP-16011-P-A, Startup Test Activity Reduction [(STAR)] Program (Reference 2). The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's original proposed no significant hazards consideration determination was published in the Federal Register on December 6, 2005 (70 FR 72671).

WCAP-16011-P-A describes methods to reduce the time required for startup testing. To this end, WCAP-16011-P-A proposes methods to eliminate the control element assembly (CEA) worth and isothermal temperature coefficient (ITC) measurements at hot zero power (HZP).

WCAP-16011-P-A includes a method to substitute the measured value of the MTC at HZP with an alternate MTC value consisting of the predicted (calculated) MTC and measured critical boron concentration (CBC) at HZP. WCAP-16011-P-A adds an ITC measurement at intermediate to hot full power, and applicability requirements for core design, fabrication, refueling, startup testing, and CEA lifetime viability requirements. WCAP-16011-P-A methods can only be applied to cores that are well characterized by an existing database.

In Reference 1, the licensee has only requested to substitute the measured value of the MTC at HZP with an alternate MTC value consisting of the predicted (calculated) MTC and measured CBC at HZP. Therefore, the NRC staffs review was limited to this scope.

2.0 REGULATORY EVALUATION

The regulations (Part 50 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR Part 50)) do not explicitly prescribe specific post-refueling startup testing. However, the genesis for post-refueling startup testing can be traced to the preoperational testing required to be specified in the final safety analysis report by 10 CFR 50.34. Section 50.36 of 10 CFR specifies surveillance requirements relating to test, calibration, or inspection to assure that the necessary quality of systems and components is maintained, that facility operation will be within safety limits, and that the limiting conditions for operation will be met. Part 50 of 10 CFR, Appendix A, General Design

Criteria (GDC), apply, in that the GDCs establish the necessary design, fabrication, construction, testing, and performance requirements for structures, systems, and components important to safety. Accordingly, the MTC is a parameter controlled in the licensees TS, including surveillance requirements. As a value in the TS, MTC and the applicable surveillance requirements are subject to regulatory oversight.

3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION

As stated previously WCAP-16011-P-A describes methods to reduce the time required for startup testing. The NRC-approved WCAP-16011-P-A on January 14, 2005, for referencing in license applications to the extent specified and under the limitations stated in the topical report and the NRC safety evaluation (SE). Since the NRC staff found the report acceptable, the review of the licensees September 19, 2005, application was to ensure that WCAP-16011-P-A is applicable to ANO-2 and that WCAP-16011-P-A is being implemented appropriately.

Entergy has only requested a partial implementation of WCAP-16011-P-A for ANO-2, that portion that replaces the current MTC Surveillance with an MTC Alternate Surveillance. However, the NRCs SE and WCAP-16011-P-A make no differentiation between the limitations, conditions, and requirements for partial or full implementation. Nor has the licensees application requested any differentiation of the limitations, conditions, or requirements for its partial implementation.

Therefore, the licensees partial implementation of WCAP-16011-P-A requires the full acceptance of the limitations, conditions, and requirements specified in the NRCs SE and WCAP-16011-P-A.

In the SE for WCAP-16011-P-A, the NRC identified three conditions and limitations for the application of WCAP-16011-P-A to individual licensees.

1. The STAR program is applicable only to the participating plants as defined in Table 3-1 of WCAP-16011-P-A.
2. Should any of the STAR test results fall outside of the test criteria, either ascertain that the safety analysis and STAR applicability requirements are satisfied, or discontinue use of the STAR program for that fuel cycle.
3. The Staff requires each licensee using STAR to submit a summary report following the first application, either successful or not, of STAR to its plant. The report should (a) identify the core design method used, (b) compare the measured and calculated values and the differences between these values to the corresponding core design method uncertainties and show compliance with the STAR applicability requirements. If the application of STAR is unsuccessful, identify the reasons why the STAR application failed.

With respect to these conditions and limitations, the licensee meets the first as ANO-2 is included in Table 3-1 of WCAP-16011-P-A. The licensee meets the second and third items as licensing commitments. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that WCAP-16011-P-A is applicable to ANO-2 and that WCAP-16011-P-A is being implemented appropriately.

The NRC staff reviewed the licensees license amendment request (LAR) reports submitted by Entergy, to support ANO-2 TS change to modify ANO-2 SR 4.1.1.4.1 and 4.1.1.4.2 to allow the use of WCAP-16011-P-A. Based on this review, the NRC staff concludes that appropriate documentation was submitted and that the proposed changes satisfy the staff positions and

requirements in these areas. Therefore, on the basis of the above review and justification, the NRC staff concludes that the proposed changes to the TS are acceptable.

4.0 STATE CONSULTATION

In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Arkansas State official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments.

5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION

The amendment changes a requirement with respect to installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20. The NRC staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration, and there has been no public comment on such finding published December 6, 2005 (70 FR 72671).

Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment.

6.0 CONCLUSION

The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commissions regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be adverse to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.

7.0 REFERENCES

4. Letter from Jeffery S. Forbes, Arkansas Nuclear One, to U.S. NRC, Re: License Amendment Request to Modify Technical Specification 3.1.1.4, Surveillance Requirements as Allowed by WCAP-16011-P-A, Startup Test Activity Reduction Program, Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2, Docket No. 50-368, License No. NPF-6, dated September 19, 2005, Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML052760278.
5. WCAP-16011-P-A, Startup Test Activity Reduction Program, dated February 2005.

ADAMS Accession No. ML050660118 (Nonproprietary version).

Principal Contributor: K. Wood Date: August 2, 2006

Arkansas Nuclear One cc:

Senior Vice President Vice President, Operations Support

& Chief Operating Officer Entergy Operations, Inc.

Entergy Operations, Inc. P. O. Box 31995 P. O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS 39286-1995 Jackson, MS 39286-1995 Wise, Carter, Child & Caraway Director, Division of Radiation P. O. Box 651 Control and Emergency Management Jackson, MS 39205 Arkansas Department of Health 4815 West Markham Street, Slot 30 Little Rock, AR 72205-3867 Winston & Strawn 1700 K Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20006-3817 Senior Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. O. Box 310 London, AR 72847 Regional Administrator, Region IV U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011-8064 County Judge of Pope County Pope County Courthouse Russellville, AR 72801 September 2005