ML12355A044

SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 11 of 14

ML12355A044
Person / Time
Site:	Vogtle
Issue date:	11/26/2012
From:	Volodarsky D Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2271 SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver 1.0
Download: ML12355A044 (43)

Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Statuso N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2 t 3o2 P'400 Equip. Class12 !zS Equipment Description t\W-,>L L*N2X*-f

• ti- , - -- V-. - 't, J Location: Bldg. P A-P ,,i' Floor El. 2"15Cý" Room, Area 10Cg Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) 1 *,-'6 .- -

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown ofan item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YV'NC UC N/AC Y*V I-J N/ACl

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Y NC UC- N/AC]

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YtNCl UC- N/AC1

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

I)jX ŽAT-C0 - d 6Co Y NEI UE]

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<*C.3 >

PAGE 391 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment 1D No. 2l - Equip. Class1 Equipment Description i?4Ž- -J --- raLIT,),-t?- t .- - ., T* .

Interaction Effects

7. Are sofi targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YW NOD UEJ N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YNK- UD N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y ND UD N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment. free YIND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y ND UD3 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

.j ,.- "N.'

Evaluated by k- C YAZI nat,:

11L i~ .s.

• <C4>

PAGE 392 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERS1000 PAGE 393 of 433

I ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONPO PAGE 394 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

(c~J~)

Equipment IDeNo. ct Equip, Class" Equipment Description C3 Location: Bldg. C-"f t.- Floor El. -ZC,0' Room, Area -

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recormnended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? NDI UO N/AUl

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YMNO UO] N/An oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NDI U" N/Ag

ýA 0 0 -r U~ T-t~L ~~

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y] ND UD N/Ad (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y' NO UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

2 Eierrhee~inut c~saijanefrom ý%ppendix B:Cilasses of Eq,.ipmcnt.

PAGE 395 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) c~

Equipment ID No. 7- 6i31 -6'7-60'2600 Equip. ClaS '_ -.

Equipment Description CV6c. Ma (t'-TL-XA7o T~%6 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y NO U-I N/AO

8. Are overhead equipment; distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NO UQ N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Vý NO tIC N/AO

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y1ANO UM of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y'9 NOI U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: * .. ),* L / . Date: " j

( C-4 >

PAGE 396 of 433

AOACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 397 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2 /JfCr'4 Equip. Class' 2 , 6' 4~4 PA ~1ie,-~

ld.I*

EquipmentDescription Hoo Il *i ,,2,p C"RoomAe Location: Bldg. Aa*k FloorEI. ,..2*-"RoomArea Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) ./f(,,dC*'/

/W -/I- -' i4J Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y% N[

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZI NDI UDI N/AD1

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YA3 NDI UD] N/AD oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YW NED UD N/AD]

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YA ND3 UD N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for vee-.

which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

2-X'Ajo -ŽzL

6. Based. on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YNEI UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 ý-"

PAGE 398 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. z- -A7- e,7 Equip, Class"-

Equipment Description prnw-,) .,/ h/ffiZ

(- A-i-Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y,K NE UC N/AO

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y;K ND3 uO NIAF and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y'M NCO UC N/AO 9, Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

YN NC uNA

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX NO U[

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as niecessary)

/0,,¢YW Evaluated by: A.~ /r-k T'-42 -%2 Date: .F IL A00 7* /Zv/.

<C-4>

PAGE 399 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 400 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONRO' PAGE 401 of 433

ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 402 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .00 PAGE 403 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2,S",1 -z Equip. Class" PAX Equipment Description CtXC(?.. Ck b:,

Q... H \ - -_ __-\

Location: Bldg. ,-,4O *- Floor El. Z,' Room, Area '3 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Vý' NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YA NE UE N/AC

3. Is the anchorage frce of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y1NO UO N/AE oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NE UVE N/AJ0 PoaAftc 1"0 <-kQ(*1-r14 A t15 .-7 , P-(A E,,

5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YANE) UO N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Pfl,_W.rA%,'- 7.AqA"- 5r.

E '

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YA NO UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12Enter the equipment class name from Appendix 13:Classes of Equi~pment.

-<C-3 >

PAGE 404 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2- -153 ' - M Equip. Class-7 - '-

Equipment Description C--.. r+

t ,.i ' .4 Interaction Effects

7. Axe soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YA NEI UD N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YJk NEI UE" N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NO U[3 N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y7 NEI UD" of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 11.. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[R NDI UD1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

. 3 -,'

7 o"?SV--ocO \t":*,L tx'j C.

Evaluated by: Evaluated by: - Date:

Dae '7 /0,- Z17

< C-4 >-

PAGE 405 of 433

A ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONO PAGE 406 of 433

'ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 407 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION*O PAGE 408 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 409 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONRO PAGE 410 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2

.Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentlDNo. Equip. Class 2 ( McC Equipmcnt Description 4-90 V MCC 2WBE Location: Bldg. P&B. Floor El. .-2_201 Room, Area R,4OI Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI4 NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of beat, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[;NI-I UI- N/AEI

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more thanmild surface Yo NCI UI- N/AEl oxidation?

4. Is the an h rage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YNONflUE 5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YJ*NC-I U- NIAQI (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Q)3ACo3- 023+3, VC* .{.O

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YV NEI U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

11Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<KC-3 >"

PAGE 411 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2-I 6*"3/ Equip. Class" Equipment Description t1LýO V N(f. Z.8A'F Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YqfNO utFj N/AOl

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YAI'NE UO N/Anl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y~f NEI U1J N/AOl CTJ 10, Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y"N(--Il Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

NOnY(.

LI ~3 2OI)~

Evaluated by: ~ _ '. 1;(,'s fo , Date:

~ /3 2cWZ.~.

< C-A >

PAGE 412 of 433

ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .00 PAGE 413 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 414 of 433

TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONO.

4.1*9 A *sof kN DIESEL GENERATOR 2B GENERATOR CONTROL PANEL 2-2403-P5-DG3 PAGE 415 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0

tL (GENERATOR

( 'ATOR CONTROL 2 - 24 0 3-P5-DG3 PAGE 416 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Sttus:/V)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentlDNo. 2 11-t'0c-i-0-coZ Equip. Class'"2 -!,/ - 7A, c,* .

Equipment Description S V` -'*- r Location: Bldg. L:t FloorEl. fS'-O" Room,Area R4-O4ý Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) .O'* - O& T cjXPa*,,, .)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of thle following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification reqiuired (i.e., is the item one YU/N0 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y"?,NDI UD N/AD3

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface /NV -D UD- N/AU-oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage firce of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y*A NDI UD N/A-

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Yý NEI UD] N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

I A)ý1 OCAr Or, 2A -qO(Jz

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YXND utD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12Enter ihe equipment class nane from Appendix Bi Ctesses of Equipment.

<C-3 )

PAGE 417 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equip. Class_'

004b*.-O T!rALPA4 Aw tv

,tHSM a¢S Equipment ID No. 2-Equipment Description v1ur=. P '" ' -" C%,.C,.6R 3 VA Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y* ND UD N/AO

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YX NO UC N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YV NO U[r] N/AC

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y N UM of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y'o NE UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

No W Evaluated by: )~ c p -4 / Date: 3- zt- zo LZ 0t-A/ o

<C-4 >

PAGE 418 of 433

A ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONel.0 E6-002 SF!*cs HEAT EXCHANGER S TRAIN I

PAGE 419 of 433

1. ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONS.

9ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 421 of 433

NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Sheet 1 of 2 Status:{&) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Z- 12/13 PC "00Z Equip. Class"- fi./'O/RI /T,. dp1. - ,,4- .5 Equipment Description 5,. 1o pdM A Location: Bldg. . Floor El. 1.95 Room, Area 491/

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration.verification required (i.e., is the item one Yp' NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YP$ NDI UDJ N/ADI

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y% ND UD N/AD oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YX ND UD N/AD 5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN ND UD N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

do 4) z D 8670 VeR, 16.0o

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yg NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

2Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Eq~uipment.

4( C-3 >

PAGE 422 of 433

NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2/2/3 -6 002 Equip. Class' 'o.4/aodr'i, CI455 ~

Equipment Description SF' o~f&M7p 4 Intercto Efet

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? V-X NO UO N/AC

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YK NC UIC N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y NoI UC N/ACr 10, Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yý NO UC of potentiaUy adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo NCI UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: C ý4 I-ate'. - 94/-,,z-

'4 1-1 101400 t~~%

<C-4 >-

PAGE 423 of 433

A ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 00

~44 2 ~TY Pu.' ~~AO PAGE 424 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONR i

I,

• ,~

/

PAGE 425 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2 Status:O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentlDNo. 2- 2L?-0,-b6( Equip. Class6 -

Equipment Description . - , - I) $,',-

41LVE Location: Bldg. F ýý Floor El. `ooý-o" Room, Area fz O, Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings, Additional space is provided at the end of this. checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorae

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NEI UE N/At

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NE UJ N/AM.

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI U- N/Ag YO- NO UO NWAXI

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

YE NE U[i]

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >-

PAGE 426 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentIDNo. 7 /z171-4&b-.001 Equip. Class"2 g Or'.f" Equipment Description SPFwr F(tL PiT "tb'A, 0 A ,16tf6A/ rsot.i1oJ u$Lc'*

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y* NO UO NIAO

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yj NO Ur- N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yo N- UO N/AO

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YI NEI UE1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 11, Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y'0 NE Uf adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluatedby: ip4A. Date:

Doyv/4bý ~6*- Zi>Z-&.Ž.

<C-4 )P PAGE 427 of 433

-ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONPO4 PAGE 428 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION*

£fN

,RDIToHR PAGE 429 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status(C N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Z -4V-1° 7Z-4Equip. Class'- 0 Equipment Description SFP A O4utlet- eb4.r, U'Ae Location: Bldg. &-X Floor El. I *tL' Room, Area A~qTTLI Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO Na of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NE UE N/A"

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEI UE N/A[x oxidation?

7

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO UC N/A0 "

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NE UE N/A4J (Note' This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEI UI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name fturn Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >

PAGE 430 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. _. I+1/ ý 7.r40"Equip. Class",_ _

Equipment Description 9I~A1~i~,(a A~~4Vt Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[dNE] U~E N/AQ

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YGý/NI' UQ N/ACI and. masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YM NEI U-1 N/A[]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yd+NEI UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE*"N-" Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages maybe added asnecessary)

( <f= e/, ).-./) 2 *-f6-0°2. ,,i r¢e+ .;

Evaluated by: Y_ __-_-_

__________i_--_,__

_0-___- Date:

! - ,,1,/ 94-. IZ.

-(C-4 >

PAGE 431 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONOO PAGE 432 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONPO PAGE 433 of 433