ML12355A044: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
| document type = Report, Technical
| document type = Report, Technical
| page count = 43
| page count = 43
| project =
| stage = Other
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Statuso N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2 t 3o2 P'400 Equip. Class12!zS Equipment Description t\W-,>L ti- , ---V-. -'t, J Location:
{{#Wiki_filter:ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                   NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Statuso N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Bldg. P A-P ,,i' Floor El. 2"15Cý" Room, Area 10Cg Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) 1 '6 .- -Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown ofan item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Equipment ID No.       2 t 3o2 P'400             Equip. Class12         !zS Equipment Description       t\W-,>L L*N2X*-f
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
* ti-           ,       -   -- V-.     -       't,       J Location: Bldg. P A-P ,,i'         Floor El. 2"15Cý"     Room, Area         10Cg Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               1   *,-'6     .-     -
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown ofan item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage
I)jX AT- C0 -d 6Co 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YV'NC UC N/ACI-J N/ACl Y NC UC- N/AC]YtNCl UC- N/AC1 Y NEI UE]12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                   YV'NC UC N/AC Y*V  I-J N/ACl
< >PAGE 391 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment 1D No. 2 l -Equip. Class 1 Equipment Description raLI i?4- -J --- T,),-t?- t .- -., .Interaction Effects 7. Are sofi targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Y  NC UC- N/AC]
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YW NOD UEJ N/AD YNK- UD N/AD-Y ND UD N/AD YIND UD Other Adverse Conditions
YtNCl UC- N/AC1
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y ND UD3 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary).j ,.- "N.'k- C YAZI nat,: Evaluated by i~ .s.11L*< C4>PAGE 392 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERS1000 PAGE 393 of 433 I ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONPO PAGE 394 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDeNo. c t Equip, Class" (c~J~)Equipment Description C3 Location:
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Bldg. C-"f t.- Floor El. -ZC,0' Room, Area -Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recormnended)
I)jX &#x17d;AT-C0              -  d                      6Co                            Y    NEI UE]
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?&#xfd;A 0 0 -r U~ T-t~L ~~5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
NDI UO N/AUl YMNO UO] N/An YO NDI U" N/Ag Y] ND UD N/Ad Y' NO UD 2 Eierrhee~inut c~saijanefrom  
12Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
&#xfd;%ppendix B:Cilasses of Eq,.ipmcnt.
                                                            <*C.3 >
PAGE 395 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 7- 6i31 -6'7-60'2600 Equip. ClaS -.'_c~Equipment Description CV6c. Ma (t'-TL-XA7o T~%6 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
PAGE 391 of 433
Y NO U-I N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment; distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NO UQ N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
 
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?V&#xfd; NO tIC N/AO Y1ANO UM Other Adverse Conditions
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                              NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y'9 NOI U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Equipment 1D No.      2l        -            Equip. Class1 Equipment Description                  i?4&#x17d;-    -J        --- raLIT,),-t?-    t  .-    -  ., T*            .
Interaction Effects
: 7. Are sofi targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?        YW NOD UEJ N/AD
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YNK-      UD N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                  Y  ND UD N/AD
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment. free        YIND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could        Y  ND UD3 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
              .j ,.- "N.'
Evaluated by                                                          k- C YAZI nat,:
11L i~  .s.
                                                      *<C4>
PAGE 392 of 433
 
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERS1000 PAGE 393 of 433
 
I ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONPO PAGE 394 of 433
 
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                    NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
(c~J~)
Equipment IDeNo.            ct                    Equip, Class" Equipment Description        C3 Location: Bldg. C-"f t.- Floor El.                -ZC,0'    Room, Area              -
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recormnended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one            YO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                          NDI UO N/AUl
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                      YMNO UO] N/An oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?              YO NDI U"     N/Ag
                  &#xfd;A 0 0          -r U~          T-t~L          ~~
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                    Y] ND UD N/Ad (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                    Y'   NO UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?
2 Eierrhee~inut c~saijanefrom &#xfd;%ppendix B:Cilasses of Eq,.ipmcnt.
PAGE 395 of 433
 
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                             NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) c~
Equipment ID No. 7-       6i31 -6'7-60'2600 Equip. ClaS '_ -.
Equipment Description         CV6c. Ma   (t'-TL-XA7o         T~%6 Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Y   NO U-I N/AO
: 8. Are overhead equipment; distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,       NO UQ N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               V&#xfd;  NO tIC N/AO
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     Y1ANO UM of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       Y'9 NOI U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: .. L / .Date: j " ( C-4 >PAGE 396 of 433 AOACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 397 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2 /JfCr'4 Equip. Class'2 , 6'EquipmentDescription Hoo Il ,,2,p C"RoomAe Location:
Evaluated by:           *        ..     ),*    L /                 .         Date:         "    j
Bldg. FloorEI.
( C-4 >
4~4 PA ~1ie,-~Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)  
PAGE 396 of 433
/f(,,dC'/  
 
./W -/I- i4J -'Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
AOACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y% N[of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 397 of 433
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
 
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                               NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
2-X'Ajo -zL vee-.6. Based. on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Equipment ID No. 2 /JfCr'4                     Equip. Class' 2 , 6'       4~4 PA ~1ie,-~
YZI NDI UDI N/AD1 YA3 NDI UD] N/AD YW NED UD N/AD]YA ND3 UD N/AD YNEI UD Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
ld.I*
< C-3 &#xfd;-" PAGE 398 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. z- -A7- e,7 Equip, Class"-Equipment Description h/ffiZ prnw-,) A-i- .,/ (-Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
EquipmentDescription             Hoo Il *i        ,,2,p C"RoomAe Location: Bldg. Aa*k            FloorEI. ,..2*-"RoomArea Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)                                 ./f(,,dC*'/
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
                                                                                              /W -/I-       -'   i4J Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
9, Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y,K NE UC N/AO Y;K ND3 uO NIAF Y'M NCO UC N/AO YN NC uNA Other Adverse Conditions
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one       Y% N[
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX NO U[adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                   YZI NDI  UDI N/AD1
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                   YA3 NDI UD] N/AD oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?           YW NED UD N/AD]
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                 YA ND3 UD N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for vee-.
which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
2-X'Ajo -&#x17d;zL
: 6. Based. on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                 YNEI UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
                                                        < C-3 &#xfd;-"
PAGE 398 of 433
 
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                               NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment IDNo. z-               -A7-     e,7 Equip, Class"-
Equipment Description                 prnw-,)               .,/ h/ffiZ
(- A-i-Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       Y,K NE UC N/AO
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,   Y;K ND3 uO NIAF and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Y'M NCO UC N/AO 9, Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
YN NC uNA
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could         YX NO U[
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as niecessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as niecessary)
/0,,&#xa2;YW Evaluated by: T'-42 A.~ /r-k -%2 Date: .F IL A00 /Zv/. 7<C-4>PAGE 399 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 400 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONRO' PAGE 401 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 402 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .00 PAGE 403 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2,S",1 -z Equip. Class" PAX Equipment Description CtXC(?.. Ck Q... b:, H \ -__-\ -_Location:
              /0,,&#xa2;YW Evaluated by:                 A.~ /r-k     T'-42            -%2                   Date:       .F   IL A00                                                                   7* /Zv/.
Bldg. ,-,4O Floor El. Z,' Room, Area '3 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
                                                      <C-4>
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
PAGE 399 of 433
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one V&#xfd;' NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
 
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage frce of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 400 of 433
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?PoaAftc 1"0 <-kQ( t A .-15 , 7 -( A P E,, 5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
 
Pfl,_W.rA%,'-
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONRO' PAGE 401 of 433
7.AqA"- E ' 5r.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
 
YA NE UE N/AC Y1NO UO N/AE YE NE UVE N/AJ0 YANE) UO N/AO YA NO UE 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix 13: Classes of Equi~pment.
ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0           NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 402 of 433
-<C-3 >PAGE 404 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- -153 ' Equip. Class-7 -M '- -Equipment Description C--.. r+ t ,.i ' .4 Interaction Effects 7. Axe soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
 
YA NEI UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YJk NEI UE" N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .00 PAGE 403 of 433
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[ NO U[3 N/AD Y7 NEI UD" Other Adverse Conditions 11.. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[R NDI UD1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
 
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) .3 7 -,' o"?SV--ocO tx'j C.Evaluated by: -Date: Evaluated by: Dae '7 /0,- Z17< C-4 >-PAGE 405 of 433 A ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONO PAGE 406 of 433  
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                     NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
'ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 407 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION*O PAGE 408 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 409 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONRO PAGE 410 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2.Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo.
Equipment ID No. 2,S",1                   -z     Equip. Class"                 PAX Equipment Description       CtXC(?..     Ck               b:,
Equip. Class 2 ( McC Equipmcnt Description 4-90 V MCC 2WBE Location:
Q... H   \         -     -_                      __-\
Bldg. P&B. Floor El. .-2_201 Room, Area R,4OI Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Location: Bldg.     ,-,4O *-      Floor El. Z,'         Room, Area           '3 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI4 NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Anchorage
: 2. Is the anchorage free of beat, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more thanmild surface oxidation?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one         V&#xfd;' NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 4. Is the an h rage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                   YA NE UE N/AC
Q)3ACo3- 023+3, VC* .{.O 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 3. Is the anchorage frce of corrosion that is more than mild surface                     Y1NO UO N/AE oxidation?
Y[;NI-I UI- N/AEI Yo NCI UI- N/AEl YNO NflUEU- NIAQI YV NEI U-11 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?           YE NE UVE N/AJ0 PoaAftc         1"0 <-kQ(*1-r14 A t15 .-7            , P-(A E,,
<KC-3 >" PAGE 411 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-I Equip. Class" Equipment Description t1L&#xfd;O V N(f. Z.8A'F Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                   YANE) UO N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Pfl,_W.rA%,'- 7.AqA"-                   5r.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10, Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YqfNO utFj N/AOl YAI'NE UO N/Anl Y~f NEI U1J N/AOl CTJ Other Adverse Conditions
E     '
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y"N(--Il Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                   YA NO UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?
12Enter the equipment class name from Appendix 13:Classes of Equi~pment.
                                                          -<C-3 >
PAGE 404 of 433
 
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                               NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 2- -153 ' - M                Equip. Class-7         - '-
Equipment Description       C--..                   r+
t         ,.i         '   .4 Interaction Effects
: 7. Axe soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?         YA NEI UD N/AD
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YJk NEI UE" N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                 Y[  NO U[3 N/AD
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free         Y7 NEI UD" of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions 11.. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could         Y[R NDI UD1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
                        . 3     -,'
7    o"?SV--ocO     \t":*,L tx'j C.
Evaluated by: Evaluated by: -                                                       Date:
Dae '7 /0,-     Z17
                                                      < C-4 >-
PAGE 405 of 433
 
A ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONO PAGE 406 of 433
 
'ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 407 of 433
 
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION*O PAGE 408 of 433
 
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 409 of 433
 
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONRO PAGE 410 of 433
 
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2
                                                                                                      .Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
EquipmentlDNo.                                   Equip. Class 2   ( McC Equipmcnt Description       4-90 V MCC 2WBE Location: Bldg.       P&B.       Floor El.       .-2_201 Room, Area       R,4OI Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one       YI4 NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of beat, broken, missing or loose hardware?                 Y[;NI-I UI- N/AEI
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more thanmild surface                   Yo NCI UI- N/AEl oxidation?
: 4. Is the an h rage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?         YNONflUE 5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                 YJ*NC-I U-  NIAQI (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Q)3ACo3- 023+3, VC* .{.O
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                 YV NEI U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
11Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
                                                          <KC-3 >"
PAGE 411 of 433
 
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                               NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.         2-I 6*"3/            Equip. Class" Equipment Description         t1L&#xfd;O V N(f. Z.8A'F Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       YqfNO    utFj N/AOl
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YAI'NE  UO N/Anl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                 Y~f NEI U1J N/AOl CTJ 10, Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could         Y"N(--Il Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
NOnY(.Evaluated by: ~ _ '. ; (,'s 1 fo , Date: LI ~3 2OI)~~ /3 2cWZ.~.< C-A >PAGE 412 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .00 PAGE 413 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 414 of 433 TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONO.4.1*9 kN A *sof DIESEL GENERATOR 2B GENERATOR CONTROL PANEL 2-2403-P5-DG3 PAGE 415 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 (:tL (GENERATOR
NOnY(.
'ATOR CONTROL 2-2 4 0 3-P5-DG3 PAGE 416 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Sttus:/V)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo.
LI ~3 2OI)~
2 11-t'0c-i-0-coZ Equip. Class'2 " -!,/ -7 A, .Equipment Description S V` -'*- r Location:
Evaluated by:             ~                   _     '. 1;(,'s fo ,                   Date:
Bldg. L:t FloorEl. fS'-O" Room,Area R4-O4&#xfd;Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) -O& T .)Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of thle following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
                                                                                                ~ /3   2cWZ.~.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification reqiuired (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
                                                        < C-A >
YU/N0 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
PAGE 412 of 433
: 4. Is the anchorage firce of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
 
I A)&#xfd;1 r OCA Or, 2A -qO(Jz 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .00 PAGE 413 of 433
Y"?,NDI UD N/AD3/NV -D UD- N/AU-NDI UD N/A-Y&#xfd; NEI UD] N/AD YXND utD 12 Enter ihe equipment class nane from Appendix Bi Ctesses of Equipment.
 
<C-3 )PAGE 417 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- Equip. Class_' T!rALPA4 Aw ,tHSM tv a&#xa2;S Equipment Description v 1ur=. P '" ' -" C%,.C,.6R VA 3 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS           NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 414 of 433
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
 
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y* ND UD N/AO YX NO UC N/AO YV NO U[r] N/AC Y N UM Other Adverse Conditions
TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                             NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONO.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y'o NE UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
4.1*9 A *sof kN DIESEL GENERATOR 2B GENERATOR CONTROL PANEL 2-2403-P5-DG3 PAGE 415 of 433
 
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                   NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0
:tL (GENERATOR
(      'ATOR CONTROL 2 - 24 0 3-P5-DG3 PAGE 416 of 433
 
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                   NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Sttus:/V)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
EquipmentlDNo.       2   11-t'0c-i-0-coZ Equip. Class'"2           -!,/   - 7A,    c,*                .
Equipment Description       S V` -'*- r Location: Bldg.     L:t         FloorEl.     fS'-O" Room,Area             R4-O4&#xfd; Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               .O'*      -     O& T   cjXPa*,,,    .)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of thle following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification reqiuired (i.e., is the item one       YU/N0 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                   Y"?,NDI UD N/AD3
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                     /NV -D UD- N/AU-oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage firce of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?           Y*A NDI UD N/A-
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                 Y&#xfd; NEI UD] N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
I   A)&#xfd;1 OCAr Or, 2A -qO(Jz
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                   YXND utD potentially adverse seismic conditions?
12Enter ihe equipment class nane from Appendix Bi Ctesses of Equipment.
                                                          <C-3 )
PAGE 417 of 433
 
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                       NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equip. Class_'
004b*.-O                      T!rALPA4   Aw             tv
                                                                                                ,tHSM       a&#xa2;S Equipment ID No.        2-Equipment Description                     v1ur=. P '"     '       -" C%,.C,.6R       3 VA Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       Y*  ND UD N/AO
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,   YX NO UC N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               YV    NO U[r] N/AC
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       Y    N    UM of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       Y'o NE     UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
No W Evaluated by: )~ c p / -4 Date: 3- zt- zo LZ 0 t-A/ o<C-4 >PAGE 418 of 433 A ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION el.0 E6-002 HEAT EXCHANGER S TRAIN I PAGE 419 of 433  
No W Evaluated by:         )~ c p -4                   /                              Date:     3- zt- zo LZ 0t-A/ o
                                                    <C-4 >
PAGE 418 of 433
 
A ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                   NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONel.0 E6-002 SF!*cs HEAT EXCHANGER S TRAIN I
PAGE 419 of 433
 
#ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONS.
#ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONS.
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 421 of 433 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Sheet 1 of 2 Status:{&)
9ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 421 of 433
N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z- 12/13 PC "00Z Equip. Class"- fi./'O/RI  
 
/T,. dp1. -,,4- .5 Equipment Description 5,. o 1 pdM A Location:
NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Sheet 1 of 2 Status:{&) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Bldg. .Floor El. 1.95 Room, Area 491/Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Equipment ID No. Z- 12/13 PC "00Z Equip. Class"- fi./'O/RI                       /T,.       dp1.   -     ,,4- .5 Equipment Description         5,. 1o    pdM           A Location: Bldg.                 . Floor El. 1.95         Room, Area           491/
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration.verification required (i.e., is the item one Yp' NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration.verification required (i.e., is the item one         Yp' NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                   YP$ NDI UDJ N/ADI
do 4) z D 8670 VeR, 16.0o 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                   Y% ND UD N/AD oxidation?
YP$ NDI UDJ N/ADI Y% ND UD N/AD YX ND UD N/AD YN ND UD N/AD Yg NO UO 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Eq~uipment.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?           YX ND UD N/AD 5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                 YN ND UD N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
4( C-3 >PAGE 422 of 433 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2/2/3 -6 002 Equip. Class' 'o.4/aodr'i, CI455 ~Equipment Description SF' o~f&M7p 4 Intercto Efet 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
do 4) z D 8670                       VeR, 16.0o
V-X NO UO N/AC 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YK NC UIC N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                   Yg NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10, Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentiaUy adverse seismic interaction effects?Y NoI UC N/ACr Y&#xfd; NO UC Other Adverse Conditions
2Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Eq~uipment.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo NCI UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
4( C-3 >
PAGE 422 of 433
 
NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 2/2/3 -6               002 Equip. Class'     'o.4/aodr'i,                   CI455 ~
Equipment Description       SF'       o~f&M7p 4 Intercto       Efet
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       V-X NO UO N/AC
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YK NC UIC N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               Y NoI UC N/ACr 10, Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       Y&#xfd; NO UC of potentiaUy adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could         Yo NCI UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: C &#xfd; 4 I-ate'. 94/-,,z--'4 1-1 101400 t~~%<C-4 >-PAGE 423 of 433 A ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 00 2 Pu.'~44~TY~~AO PAGE 424 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONR i I,* :,~/PAGE 425 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2 Status:O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo.
Evaluated by:                                     C &#xfd;4                             I-ate'. - 94/-,,z-
2- 2L?-0,-b6( Equip. Class6 -Equipment Description  
                                                                                                    '4 1-1 101400         t~~%
$,',- .-, -I) 41LVE Location:
                                                        <C-4 >-
Bldg. F &#xfd;&#xfd; Floor El. `oo&#xfd;-o" Room, Area fz O, Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
PAGE 423 of 433
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings, Additional space is provided at the end of this. checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorae 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
 
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
A ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                     NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 00
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
                                              ~44 2   ~TY Pu.' ~~AO PAGE 424 of 433
 
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                   NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONR i
I,
                      *:,~
                                                        /
PAGE 425 of 433
 
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                     NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2 Status:O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
EquipmentlDNo.         2-   2L?-0,-b6( Equip. Class6                   -
Equipment Description                         .         -       ,               -               I) $,',-
41LVE Location: Bldg.       F &#xfd;&#xfd;         Floor El.     `oo&#xfd;-o"     Room, Area         fz   O, Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings, Additional space is provided at the end of this. checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorae
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one       YEO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                   YE NEI UE N/At
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                   YE NE UJ    N/AM.
oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?           YE NEI U-  N/Ag YO- NO UO NWAXI
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
YE NE U[i]
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YEO YE NEI UE N/At YE NE UJ N/AM.YE NEI U- N/Ag YO- NO UO NWAXI YE NE U[i]12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
12Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
<C-3 >-PAGE 426 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.
                                                          <C-3 >-
7 /z171-4&b-.001 Equip. Class"2 g Or'. f" Equipment Description SPFwr F(tL PiT "tb'A, 0 A ,16tf6A/ rsot.i1oJ Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
PAGE 426 of 433
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
 
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y* NO UO NIAO Yj NO Ur- N/AE Yo N- UO N/AO YI NEI UE1 Other Adverse Conditions 11, Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y'0 NE Uf adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                               NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
EquipmentIDNo.           7 /z171-4&b-.001     Equip. Class"2 g   Or'.f" Equipment Description       SPFwr F(tL PiT       "tb'A, 0 A ,16tf6A/ rsot.i1oJ u$Lc'*
Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       Y* NO UO NIAO
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yj NO Ur- N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               Yo N-  UO N/AO
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       YI NEI UE1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions 11, Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could         Y'0 NE Uf adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluatedby:
Evaluatedby:                                                            ip4A. Date:
Doyv/4b&#xfd; ip4A. Date:~6*- Zi>Z-&..<C-4 )P PAGE 427 of 433  
Doyv/4b&#xfd;           ~6*- Zi>Z-&.&#x17d;.
-ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONPO4 PAGE 428 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS
                                                      <C-4 )P PAGE 427 of 433
-&#xa3;fN ,RDIToH R NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION*PAGE 429 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status(C N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z -4V- 1&deg; 7 Z-4Equip.
 
Class'-0 Equipment Description SFP A O4utlet- eb4.r, U'Ae Location:
-ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONPO4 PAGE 428 of 433
Bldg. &-X Floor El. I Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
A~q L TT I Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION*
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO Na of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
                              &#xa3;fN
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
                              ,RDIToHR PAGE 429 of 433
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note' This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
 
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                   NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status(C N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
YE NE UE N/A" YE NEI UE N/A[x YO NO UC N/A0 7" YO NE UE N/A4J Y[ NEI UI Enter the equipment class name fturn Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Equipment ID No.       Z     -4V-1&deg; 7Z-4Equip. Class'-                               0 Equipment Description       SFP     A             O4utlet-       eb4.r,         U'Ae Location: Bldg.     &-X         Floor El. I *tL'      Room, Area               A~qTTLI Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
< C-3 >PAGE 430 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. _. I+1/ &#xfd; 7.r40 " Equip. Class",_ _Equipment Description 9I~A1~i~,(a A~~4Vt Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and. masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one       YO Na of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[dNE] U~E N/AQ YG&#xfd;/NI' UQ N/ACI YM NEI U-1 N/A[]Yd+ NEI UE Other Adverse Conditions
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                   YE NE UE N/A"
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE"N-" Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                   YE NEI UE N/A[x oxidation?
Comments (Additional pages maybe added asnecessary)( e/, 2 )<f= ).-./
7
i *,, r&#xa2;e+ .;Evaluated by: Y_ __-_-_ _0-___- __________i_--_,__
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?           YO NO UC N/A0          "
Date:! -, ,1,/94-. IZ.-(C-4 >PAGE 431 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONOO PAGE 432 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONPO PAGE 433 of 433}}
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                 YO NE UE N/A4J (Note' This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                   Y[    NEI  UI potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Enter the equipment class name fturn Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
                                                        < C-3 >
PAGE 430 of 433
 
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                               NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. _.       I+1/ &#xfd;   7.r40"Equip. Class",_                       _
Equipment Description     9I~A1~i~,(a                                     A~~4Vt Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       Y[dNE] U~E N/AQ
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YG&#xfd;/NI' UQ N/ACI and. masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                 YM NEI U-1 N/A[]
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free         Yd+NEI UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could         YE*"N-" Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages maybe added asnecessary)
( <f= e/, ).-./) 2 *-f6-0&deg;2. ,,i                      r&#xa2;e+   .;
Evaluated by:                 Y_                     __-_-_
__________i_--_,__
_0-___-                Date:
                                    !                     - ,,1,/                             94-. IZ.
                                                      -(C-4 >
PAGE 431 of 433
 
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONOO PAGE 432 of 433
 
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONPO PAGE 433 of 433}}

Latest revision as of 09:48, 6 February 2020

SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 11 of 14
ML12355A044
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Volodarsky D
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2271 SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver 1.0
Download: ML12355A044 (43)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Statuso N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2 t 3o2 P'400 Equip. Class12 !zS Equipment Description t\W-,>L L*N2X*-f

  • ti- , - -- V-. - 't, J Location: Bldg. P A-P ,,i' Floor El. 2"15Cý" Room, Area 10Cg Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) 1 *,-'6 .- -

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown ofan item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YV'NC UC N/AC Y*V I-J N/ACl
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Y NC UC- N/AC]

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YtNCl UC- N/AC1

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

I)jX ŽAT-C0 - d 6Co Y NEI UE]

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<*C.3 >

PAGE 391 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment 1D No. 2l - Equip. Class1 Equipment Description i?4Ž- -J --- raLIT,),-t?- t .- - ., T* .

Interaction Effects

7. Are sofi targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YW NOD UEJ N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YNK- UD N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y ND UD N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment. free YIND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y ND UD3 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

.j ,.- "N.'

Evaluated by k- C YAZI nat,:

11L i~ .s.

  • <C4>

PAGE 392 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERS1000 PAGE 393 of 433

I ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONPO PAGE 394 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

(c~J~)

Equipment IDeNo. ct Equip, Class" Equipment Description C3 Location: Bldg. C-"f t.- Floor El. -ZC,0' Room, Area -

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recormnended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? NDI UO N/AUl
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YMNO UO] N/An oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NDI U" N/Ag

ýA 0 0 -r U~ T-t~L ~~

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y] ND UD N/Ad (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y' NO UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

2 Eierrhee~inut c~saijanefrom ý%ppendix B:Cilasses of Eq,.ipmcnt.

PAGE 395 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) c~

Equipment ID No. 7- 6i31 -6'7-60'2600 Equip. ClaS '_ -.

Equipment Description CV6c. Ma (t'-TL-XA7o T~%6 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y NO U-I N/AO

8. Are overhead equipment; distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NO UQ N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Vý NO tIC N/AO
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y1ANO UM of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y'9 NOI U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: * .. ),* L / . Date: " j

( C-4 >

PAGE 396 of 433

AOACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 397 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2 /JfCr'4 Equip. Class' 2 , 6' 4~4 PA ~1ie,-~

ld.I*

EquipmentDescription Hoo Il *i ,,2,p C"RoomAe Location: Bldg. Aa*k FloorEI. ,..2*-"RoomArea Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) ./f(,,dC*'/

/W -/I- -' i4J Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y% N[

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZI NDI UDI N/AD1
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YA3 NDI UD] N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YW NED UD N/AD]
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YA ND3 UD N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for vee-.

which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

2-X'Ajo -ŽzL

6. Based. on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YNEI UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 ý-"

PAGE 398 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. z- -A7- e,7 Equip, Class"-

Equipment Description prnw-,) .,/ h/ffiZ

(- A-i-Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y,K NE UC N/AO
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y;K ND3 uO NIAF and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y'M NCO UC N/AO 9, Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

YN NC uNA

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX NO U[

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as niecessary)

/0,,¢YW Evaluated by: A.~ /r-k T'-42 -%2 Date: .F IL A00 7* /Zv/.

<C-4>

PAGE 399 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 400 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONRO' PAGE 401 of 433

ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 402 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .00 PAGE 403 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2,S",1 -z Equip. Class" PAX Equipment Description CtXC(?.. Ck b:,

Q... H \ - -_ __-\

Location: Bldg. ,-,4O *- Floor El. Z,' Room, Area '3 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Vý' NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YA NE UE N/AC
3. Is the anchorage frce of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y1NO UO N/AE oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NE UVE N/AJ0 PoaAftc 1"0 <-kQ(*1-r14 A t15 .-7 , P-(A E,,

5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YANE) UO N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Pfl,_W.rA%,'- 7.AqA"- 5r.

E '

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YA NO UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12Enter the equipment class name from Appendix 13:Classes of Equi~pment.

-<C-3 >

PAGE 404 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2- -153 ' - M Equip. Class-7 - '-

Equipment Description C--.. r+

t ,.i ' .4 Interaction Effects

7. Axe soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YA NEI UD N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YJk NEI UE" N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NO U[3 N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y7 NEI UD" of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 11.. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[R NDI UD1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

. 3 -,'

7 o"?SV--ocO \t":*,L tx'j C.

Evaluated by: Evaluated by: - Date:

Dae '7 /0,- Z17

< C-4 >-

PAGE 405 of 433

A ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONO PAGE 406 of 433

'ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 407 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION*O PAGE 408 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 409 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONRO PAGE 410 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2

.Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentlDNo. Equip. Class 2 ( McC Equipmcnt Description 4-90 V MCC 2WBE Location: Bldg. P&B. Floor El. .-2_201 Room, Area R,4OI Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI4 NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of beat, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[;NI-I UI- N/AEI
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more thanmild surface Yo NCI UI- N/AEl oxidation?
4. Is the an h rage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YNONflUE 5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YJ*NC-I U- NIAQI (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Q)3ACo3- 023+3, VC* .{.O

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YV NEI U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

11Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<KC-3 >"

PAGE 411 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2-I 6*"3/ Equip. Class" Equipment Description t1LýO V N(f. Z.8A'F Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YqfNO utFj N/AOl
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YAI'NE UO N/Anl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y~f NEI U1J N/AOl CTJ 10, Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y"N(--Il Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

NOnY(.

LI ~3 2OI)~

Evaluated by: ~ _ '. 1;(,'s fo , Date:

~ /3 2cWZ.~.

< C-A >

PAGE 412 of 433

ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .00 PAGE 413 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 414 of 433

TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONO.

4.1*9 A *sof kN DIESEL GENERATOR 2B GENERATOR CONTROL PANEL 2-2403-P5-DG3 PAGE 415 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0

tL (GENERATOR

( 'ATOR CONTROL 2 - 24 0 3-P5-DG3 PAGE 416 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Sttus:/V)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentlDNo. 2 11-t'0c-i-0-coZ Equip. Class'"2 -!,/ - 7A, c,* .

Equipment Description S V` -'*- r Location: Bldg. L:t FloorEl. fS'-O" Room,Area R4-O4ý Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) .O'* - O& T cjXPa*,,, .)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of thle following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification reqiuired (i.e., is the item one YU/N0 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y"?,NDI UD N/AD3
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface /NV -D UD- N/AU-oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage firce of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y*A NDI UD N/A-
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Yý NEI UD] N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

I A)ý1 OCAr Or, 2A -qO(Jz

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YXND utD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12Enter ihe equipment class nane from Appendix Bi Ctesses of Equipment.

<C-3 )

PAGE 417 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equip. Class_'

004b*.-O T!rALPA4 Aw tv

,tHSM a¢S Equipment ID No. 2-Equipment Description v1ur=. P '" ' -" C%,.C,.6R 3 VA Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y* ND UD N/AO
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YX NO UC N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YV NO U[r] N/AC
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y N UM of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y'o NE UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

No W Evaluated by: )~ c p -4 / Date: 3- zt- zo LZ 0t-A/ o

<C-4 >

PAGE 418 of 433

A ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONel.0 E6-002 SF!*cs HEAT EXCHANGER S TRAIN I

PAGE 419 of 433

  1. ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONS.

9ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 421 of 433

NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Sheet 1 of 2 Status:{&) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Z- 12/13 PC "00Z Equip. Class"- fi./'O/RI /T,. dp1. - ,,4- .5 Equipment Description 5,. 1o pdM A Location: Bldg. . Floor El. 1.95 Room, Area 491/

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration.verification required (i.e., is the item one Yp' NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YP$ NDI UDJ N/ADI
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y% ND UD N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YX ND UD N/AD 5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN ND UD N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

do 4) z D 8670 VeR, 16.0o

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yg NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

2Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Eq~uipment.

4( C-3 >

PAGE 422 of 433

NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2/2/3 -6 002 Equip. Class' 'o.4/aodr'i, CI455 ~

Equipment Description SF' o~f&M7p 4 Intercto Efet

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? V-X NO UO N/AC
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YK NC UIC N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y NoI UC N/ACr 10, Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yý NO UC of potentiaUy adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo NCI UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: C ý4 I-ate'. - 94/-,,z-

'4 1-1 101400 t~~%

<C-4 >-

PAGE 423 of 433

A ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 00

~44 2 ~TY Pu.' ~~AO PAGE 424 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONR i

I,

  • ,~

/

PAGE 425 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2 Status:O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentlDNo. 2- 2L?-0,-b6( Equip. Class6 -

Equipment Description . - , - I) $,',-

41LVE Location: Bldg. F ýý Floor El. `ooý-o" Room, Area fz O, Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings, Additional space is provided at the end of this. checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorae

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NEI UE N/At
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NE UJ N/AM.

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI U- N/Ag YO- NO UO NWAXI
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

YE NE U[i]

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >-

PAGE 426 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentIDNo. 7 /z171-4&b-.001 Equip. Class"2 g Or'.f" Equipment Description SPFwr F(tL PiT "tb'A, 0 A ,16tf6A/ rsot.i1oJ u$Lc'*

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y* NO UO NIAO
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yj NO Ur- N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yo N- UO N/AO
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YI NEI UE1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 11, Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y'0 NE Uf adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluatedby: ip4A. Date:

Doyv/4bý ~6*- Zi>Z-&.Ž.

<C-4 )P PAGE 427 of 433

-ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONPO4 PAGE 428 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION*

£fN

,RDIToHR PAGE 429 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status(C N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Z -4V-1° 7Z-4Equip. Class'- 0 Equipment Description SFP A O4utlet- eb4.r, U'Ae Location: Bldg. &-X Floor El. I *tL' Room, Area A~qTTLI Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO Na of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NE UE N/A"
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEI UE N/A[x oxidation?

7

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO UC N/A0 "
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NE UE N/A4J (Note' This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEI UI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name fturn Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >

PAGE 430 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. _. I+1/ ý 7.r40"Equip. Class",_ _

Equipment Description 9I~A1~i~,(a A~~4Vt Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[dNE] U~E N/AQ
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YGý/NI' UQ N/ACI and. masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YM NEI U-1 N/A[]
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yd+NEI UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE*"N-" Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages maybe added asnecessary)

( <f= e/, ).-./) 2 *-f6-0°2. ,,i r¢e+ .;

Evaluated by: Y_ __-_-_

__________i_--_,__

_0-___- Date:

! - ,,1,/ 94-. IZ.

-(C-4 >

PAGE 431 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONOO PAGE 432 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONPO PAGE 433 of 433

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12355A044&oldid=2458914"