ML14099A012: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML14099A012
| number = ML14099A012
| issue date = 04/08/2014
| issue date = 04/08/2014
| title = 2014/04/08 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review of Turkey Point, Unit 3, Fifth Inspection Interval Relief Request No. 1 Rev. 0 (TAC No. MF3834)
| title = NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review of Turkey Point, Unit 3, Fifth Inspection Interval Relief Request No. 1 Rev. 0
| author name = Saba F E
| author name = Saba F
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL
| addressee name = Tomonto R J
| addressee name = Tomonto R
| addressee affiliation = Florida Power & Light Co
| addressee affiliation = Florida Power & Light Co
| docket = 05000250, 05000251
| docket = 05000250, 05000251
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Saba, Farideh Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 1:10 PM To: Bob.Tomonto@fpl.com; Czaya, Paul (Paul.Czaya@fpl.com)
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:                       Saba, Farideh Sent:                       Tuesday, April 08, 2014 1:10 PM To:                         Bob.Tomonto@fpl.com; Czaya, Paul (Paul.Czaya@fpl.com)
Cc: Klett, Audrey; Regner, Lisa
Cc:                         Klett, Audrey; Regner, Lisa


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review of Turkey Point, Unit 3, Fifth Inspection Interval Relief Request No. 1 Rev. 0 (TAC No. MF3834)
Acceptance Review of Turkey Point, Unit 3, Fifth Inspection Interval Relief Request No. 1 Rev. 0 (TAC No. MF3834)
Importance:
Importance:                 High Bob/Paul, By letter dated April 4, 2014, and pursuant to Section 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Florida Power & Light Company (the licensee) submitted a request for NRC authorization of the licensees use of a proposed alternative to ASME Section XI, Subparagraph IWB-3142.3. Acceptance by Corrective Measures or Repair/Replacement Activity, which requires that a component containing relevant conditions is acceptable for continued operation service if the relevant conditions are corrected by a repair/replacement activity or corrective measures to the extent necessary to meet the acceptance standard of Table IWB-3410-1. The licensee requested this authorization on the basis that hardship and unusual difficulty exists without a compensating increase in the level of quality and safety. The NRC performed an acceptance review of the submittal to determine if the scope and depth of technical information is sufficient for the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the request has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
High Bob/Paul, By letter dated April 4, 2014, and pursuant to Section 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Florida Power & Light Company (the licensee) submitted a request for NRC authorization of the licensee's use of a proposed alternative to ASME Section XI, Subparagraph IWB-3142.3. "Acceptance by Corrective Measures or Repair/Replacement Activity," which requires that a component containing relevant conditions is acceptable for continued operation service if the relevant conditions are corrected by a repair/replacement activity or corrective measures to the extent necessary to meet the acceptance standard of Table IWB-3410-1. The licensee requested this authorization on the basis that hardship and unusual difficulty  
The NRC staff has reviewed the licensees application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
 
exists without a compensating increase in the level of quality and safety. The NRC performed an acceptance review of the submittal to determine if the scope and depth of technical information is sufficient for the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the request has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.  
 
The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's application and concluded that it does provi de technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that  
 
impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed te chnical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.  
 
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1447 or via email by farideh.saba@nrc.gov.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1447 or via email by farideh.saba@nrc.gov.
Farideh E. Saba, P.E. Senior Project Manager NRC/ADRO/NRR/DORL 301-415-1447 Mail Stop O-8G9A Farideh.Saba@NRC.GOV
Farideh E. Saba, P.E.
Senior Project Manager NRC/ADRO/NRR/DORL 301-415-1447 Mail Stop O-8G9A Farideh.Saba@NRC.GOV 1


Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 1210   Mail Envelope Properties   (Farideh.Saba@nrc.gov20140408131000)
Hearing Identifier:     NRR_PMDA Email Number:           1210 Mail Envelope Properties     (Farideh.Saba@nrc.gov20140408131000)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review of Turkey Point, Unit 3, Fifth Inspection Interval Relief Request No. 1 Rev. 0 (TAC No. MF3834) Sent Date:   4/8/2014 1:10:01 PM Received Date: 4/8/2014 1:10:00 PM From:   Saba, Farideh Created By:   Farideh.Saba@nrc.gov Recipients:     "Klett, Audrey" <Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Regner, Lisa" <Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Bob.Tomonto@fpl.com" <Bob.Tomonto@fpl.com>
Acceptance Review of Turkey Point, Unit 3, Fifth Inspection Interval Relief Request No. 1 Rev. 0 (TAC No. MF3834)
Tracking Status: None "Czaya, Paul (Paul.Czaya@fpl.com)" <Paul.Czaya@fpl.com> Tracking Status: None  
Sent Date:             4/8/2014 1:10:01 PM Received Date:         4/8/2014 1:10:00 PM From:                   Saba, Farideh Created By:             Farideh.Saba@nrc.gov Recipients:
 
"Klett, Audrey" <Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov>
Post Office:     Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   2315     4/8/2014 1:10:00 PM Options Priority:     High   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   Yes   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:}}
Tracking Status: None "Regner, Lisa" <Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Bob.Tomonto@fpl.com" <Bob.Tomonto@fpl.com>
Tracking Status: None "Czaya, Paul (Paul.Czaya@fpl.com)" <Paul.Czaya@fpl.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files                           Size                   Date & Time MESSAGE                         2315                   4/8/2014 1:10:00 PM Options Priority:                       High Return Notification:           No Reply Requested:               Yes Sensitivity:                   Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:}}

Latest revision as of 07:57, 5 December 2019

NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review of Turkey Point, Unit 3, Fifth Inspection Interval Relief Request No. 1 Rev. 0
ML14099A012
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/08/2014
From: Farideh Saba
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
To: Tomonto R
Florida Power & Light Co
References
MF3834
Download: ML14099A012 (2)
v • d • e


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Saba, Farideh Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 1:10 PM To: Bob.Tomonto@fpl.com; Czaya, Paul (Paul.Czaya@fpl.com)

Cc: Klett, Audrey; Regner, Lisa

Subject:

Acceptance Review of Turkey Point, Unit 3, Fifth Inspection Interval Relief Request No. 1 Rev. 0 (TAC No. MF3834)

Importance: High Bob/Paul, By letter dated April 4, 2014, and pursuant to Section 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Florida Power & Light Company (the licensee) submitted a request for NRC authorization of the licensees use of a proposed alternative to ASME Section XI, Subparagraph IWB-3142.3. Acceptance by Corrective Measures or Repair/Replacement Activity, which requires that a component containing relevant conditions is acceptable for continued operation service if the relevant conditions are corrected by a repair/replacement activity or corrective measures to the extent necessary to meet the acceptance standard of Table IWB-3410-1. The licensee requested this authorization on the basis that hardship and unusual difficulty exists without a compensating increase in the level of quality and safety. The NRC performed an acceptance review of the submittal to determine if the scope and depth of technical information is sufficient for the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the request has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed the licensees application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1447 or via email by farideh.saba@nrc.gov.

Farideh E. Saba, P.E.

Senior Project Manager NRC/ADRO/NRR/DORL 301-415-1447 Mail Stop O-8G9A Farideh.Saba@NRC.GOV 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 1210 Mail Envelope Properties (Farideh.Saba@nrc.gov20140408131000)

Subject:

Acceptance Review of Turkey Point, Unit 3, Fifth Inspection Interval Relief Request No. 1 Rev. 0 (TAC No. MF3834)

Sent Date: 4/8/2014 1:10:01 PM Received Date: 4/8/2014 1:10:00 PM From: Saba, Farideh Created By: Farideh.Saba@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Klett, Audrey" <Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Regner, Lisa" <Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Bob.Tomonto@fpl.com" <Bob.Tomonto@fpl.com>

Tracking Status: None "Czaya, Paul (Paul.Czaya@fpl.com)" <Paul.Czaya@fpl.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2315 4/8/2014 1:10:00 PM Options Priority: High Return Notification: No Reply Requested: Yes Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML14099A012&oldid=2234922"