ML061080105: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML061080105
| number = ML061080105
| issue date = 04/20/2006
| issue date = 04/20/2006
| title = Cooper, Memorandum to Docket File, Reason for Postponing Public Meeting Discussing Tornado Design Concerns
| title = Memorandum to Docket File, Reason for Postponing Public Meeting Discussing Tornado Design Concerns
| author name = Benney B J
| author name = Benney B
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 9: Line 9:
| docket = 05000298
| docket = 05000298
| license number = DPR-046
| license number = DPR-046
| contact person = Benney B J, NRR/DLPM, 415-3764
| contact person = Benney B, NRR/DLPM, 415-3764
| case reference number = TAC MC8236
| case reference number = TAC MC8236
| document type = Memoranda
| document type = Memoranda
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:April 20, 2006MEMORANDUM TO:Docket FileFROM:Brian Benney, Project Manager/RA/Plant Licensing Branch IVDivision of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
{{#Wiki_filter:April 20, 2006 MEMORANDUM TO: Docket File FROM:                   Brian Benney, Project Manager       /RA/
Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
COOPER NUCLEAR STATION RE: REASON FOR POSTPONINGPUBLIC MEETING DISCUSSING TORNADO DESIGN CONCERNS (TAC NO. MC8236)The NRC planned a public meeting for April 21, 2006, at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's(NRC's) offices in Rockville, Maryland between the Nebraska Public Power District (the licenseefor the Cooper Nuclear Station (CNS)) and the NRC staff from Region IV and the Office ofNuclear Reactor Regulation. The purpose of the meeting was, in part, to discuss the NRC staff's concerns with the adequacy of an informal calculation performed by the licensee that was intended to demonstrate the structural integrity of the safety-related heating, ventilation,and air conditioning (HVAC) ductwork in the diesel generator building at CNS under certain tornado loadings. The NRC staff's review of the calculation found that the high stressescalculated for the ductwork did not demonstrate that the structural integrity of the HVACductwork would be maintained. The NRC also believes that the stresses would likely causefailure of the ductwork, and could lead to a condition where the diesel generators may become inoperable. The NRC staff proposed to hold the meeting as soon as possible to establish if thehigh stresses in the HVAC ductwork represented an immediate safety concern to the CNS facility.The licensee was aware of the NRC staff's concerns prior to the April 21, 2006, meeting, and,subsequently, performed a new calculation using a different methodology than previously used. The new calculation is based on an American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) paper entitled, "Evaluation of the Ultimate Pressure Capacity of Rectangular HVAC Ducts for Nuclear Power Plants," by Bendt W. Wedellsborg, published in the conference proceedings, "Structural Engineering in Nuclear Facilities," Volume 2, September 10-12, 1984. The licensee's newcalculation is intended to demonstrate that the HVAC ductwork will not fail when subjected tothe tornado depressurization and repressurization loadings using the design method described in the ASCE paper. The analytical design method in the ASCE paper is correlated with data obtained from testing of HVAC ductwork for another nuclear power plant. Consequently, the NRC staff decided to postpone the meeting until the first week in May 2006,which would allow the staff sufficient time to review the ASCE paper and the new calculation performed by the licensee. Because the licensee is no longer relying on its initial calculation to ensure the structural integrity of the HVAC ductwork, and instead, is relying on the newly found methodology based on the ASCE paper, the previous calculation is no longer valid and could not justify that there is an immediate safety concern with the CNS HVAC ductwork. Therefore, postponing the meeting for approximately two weeks was deemed appropriate.Docket No. 50-298  
COOPER NUCLEAR STATION RE: REASON FOR POSTPONING PUBLIC MEETING DISCUSSING TORNADO DESIGN CONCERNS (TAC NO. MC8236)
The NRC planned a public meeting for April 21, 2006, at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRCs) offices in Rockville, Maryland between the Nebraska Public Power District (the licensee for the Cooper Nuclear Station (CNS)) and the NRC staff from Region IV and the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. The purpose of the meeting was, in part, to discuss the NRC staffs concerns with the adequacy of an informal calculation performed by the licensee that was intended to demonstrate the structural integrity of the safety-related heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) ductwork in the diesel generator building at CNS under certain tornado loadings. The NRC staffs review of the calculation found that the high stresses calculated for the ductwork did not demonstrate that the structural integrity of the HVAC ductwork would be maintained. The NRC also believes that the stresses would likely cause failure of the ductwork, and could lead to a condition where the diesel generators may become inoperable. The NRC staff proposed to hold the meeting as soon as possible to establish if the high stresses in the HVAC ductwork represented an immediate safety concern to the CNS facility.
The licensee was aware of the NRC staffs concerns prior to the April 21, 2006, meeting, and, subsequently, performed a new calculation using a different methodology than previously used.
The new calculation is based on an American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) paper entitled, Evaluation of the Ultimate Pressure Capacity of Rectangular HVAC Ducts for Nuclear Power Plants, by Bendt W. Wedellsborg, published in the conference proceedings, Structural Engineering in Nuclear Facilities, Volume 2, September 10-12, 1984. The licensees new calculation is intended to demonstrate that the HVAC ductwork will not fail when subjected to the tornado depressurization and repressurization loadings using the design method described in the ASCE paper. The analytical design method in the ASCE paper is correlated with data obtained from testing of HVAC ductwork for another nuclear power plant.
Consequently, the NRC staff decided to postpone the meeting until the first week in May 2006, which would allow the staff sufficient time to review the ASCE paper and the new calculation performed by the licensee. Because the licensee is no longer relying on its initial calculation to ensure the structural integrity of the HVAC ductwork, and instead, is relying on the newly found methodology based on the ASCE paper, the previous calculation is no longer valid and could not justify that there is an immediate safety concern with the CNS HVAC ductwork. Therefore, postponing the meeting for approximately two weeks was deemed appropriate.
Docket No. 50-298


OFFICELPL4/PMLPL4/LALPL4/BCNAMEBBenney;mxr4LFeizollahiDTerao DATE4/19/064/16/064/20/06}}
OFFICE            LPL4/PM                    LPL4/LA                LPL4/BC NAME              BBenney;mxr4                LFeizollahi            DTerao DATE              4/19/06                    4/16/06                4/20/06}}

Latest revision as of 19:42, 23 November 2019

Memorandum to Docket File, Reason for Postponing Public Meeting Discussing Tornado Design Concerns
ML061080105
Person / Time
Site: Cooper Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 04/20/2006
From: Brian Benney
Plant Licensing Branch III-2
To:
Benney B, NRR/DLPM, 415-3764
References
TAC MC8236
Download: ML061080105 (2)


Text

April 20, 2006 MEMORANDUM TO: Docket File FROM: Brian Benney, Project Manager /RA/

Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

SUBJECT:

COOPER NUCLEAR STATION RE: REASON FOR POSTPONING PUBLIC MEETING DISCUSSING TORNADO DESIGN CONCERNS (TAC NO. MC8236)

The NRC planned a public meeting for April 21, 2006, at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRCs) offices in Rockville, Maryland between the Nebraska Public Power District (the licensee for the Cooper Nuclear Station (CNS)) and the NRC staff from Region IV and the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. The purpose of the meeting was, in part, to discuss the NRC staffs concerns with the adequacy of an informal calculation performed by the licensee that was intended to demonstrate the structural integrity of the safety-related heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) ductwork in the diesel generator building at CNS under certain tornado loadings. The NRC staffs review of the calculation found that the high stresses calculated for the ductwork did not demonstrate that the structural integrity of the HVAC ductwork would be maintained. The NRC also believes that the stresses would likely cause failure of the ductwork, and could lead to a condition where the diesel generators may become inoperable. The NRC staff proposed to hold the meeting as soon as possible to establish if the high stresses in the HVAC ductwork represented an immediate safety concern to the CNS facility.

The licensee was aware of the NRC staffs concerns prior to the April 21, 2006, meeting, and, subsequently, performed a new calculation using a different methodology than previously used.

The new calculation is based on an American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) paper entitled, Evaluation of the Ultimate Pressure Capacity of Rectangular HVAC Ducts for Nuclear Power Plants, by Bendt W. Wedellsborg, published in the conference proceedings, Structural Engineering in Nuclear Facilities, Volume 2, September 10-12, 1984. The licensees new calculation is intended to demonstrate that the HVAC ductwork will not fail when subjected to the tornado depressurization and repressurization loadings using the design method described in the ASCE paper. The analytical design method in the ASCE paper is correlated with data obtained from testing of HVAC ductwork for another nuclear power plant.

Consequently, the NRC staff decided to postpone the meeting until the first week in May 2006, which would allow the staff sufficient time to review the ASCE paper and the new calculation performed by the licensee. Because the licensee is no longer relying on its initial calculation to ensure the structural integrity of the HVAC ductwork, and instead, is relying on the newly found methodology based on the ASCE paper, the previous calculation is no longer valid and could not justify that there is an immediate safety concern with the CNS HVAC ductwork. Therefore, postponing the meeting for approximately two weeks was deemed appropriate.

Docket No. 50-298

OFFICE LPL4/PM LPL4/LA LPL4/BC NAME BBenney;mxr4 LFeizollahi DTerao DATE 4/19/06 4/16/06 4/20/06