ML070851385: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:March 26, | {{#Wiki_filter:March 26,2007 | ||
Mr. Christopher M. Crane | |||
President and Chief Nuclear Officer | |||
Exelon Nuclear | Exelon Nuclear | ||
Exelon Generation Company, LLC | Exelon Generation Company, LLC | ||
4300 Winfield Road | 4300 Winfield Road | ||
Warrenville, IL | Warrenville, IL 60555 | ||
INSPECTION 05000373/2007009(DRS); 05000374/2007009(DRS)Dear Mr. Crane: | SUBJECT: LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 - INFORMATION REQUEST | ||
On August 27, 2007, the NRC will begin a biennial baseline Component Design | FOR AN NRC BIENNIAL BASELINE COMPONENT DESIGN BASES | ||
INSPECTION 05000373/2007009(DRS); 05000374/2007009(DRS) | |||
Dear Mr. Crane: | |||
On August 27, 2007, the NRC will begin a biennial baseline Component Design Bases | |||
Inspection (CDBI) at the LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2. This inspection will be | |||
performed in accordance with revised NRC Baseline Inspection Procedure (IP) 71111.21 and | performed in accordance with revised NRC Baseline Inspection Procedure (IP) 71111.21 and | ||
replaces the biennial Safety System Design and Performance Capability Inspection. The CDBI inspection focuses on components which have high risk and low design margins. The components to be reviewed during this baseline inspection will be identified during an | replaces the biennial Safety System Design and Performance Capability Inspection. | ||
in-office preparation week prior to the first week of the on-site inspection. | The CDBI inspection focuses on components which have high risk and low design margins. | ||
The components to be reviewed during this baseline inspection will be identified during an | |||
in-office preparation week prior to the first week of the on-site inspection. In addition, a number | |||
of risk significant operator actions and operating experience issues, associated with the | of risk significant operator actions and operating experience issues, associated with the | ||
component samples, will also be selected for review. | component samples, will also be selected for review. | ||
engineering and one on operations. | The inspection will include 3 weeks on-site, including the information gathering during the first | ||
*September 24 through September 28, 2007.The team will be preparing for the inspection, mainly during the week of August 20, 2007, | on-site week. The inspection team will consist of six NRC inspectors, of whom five will focus on | ||
engineering and one on operations. The current inspection schedule is as follows: | |||
* August 27 through August 31, 2007; | |||
* September 10 through September 14, 2007; and | |||
* September 24 through September 28, 2007. | |||
The team will be preparing for the inspection, mainly during the week of August 20, 2007, as | |||
discussed in the attached enclosure. A Region III Senior Reactor Analyst may accompany the | |||
inspection team during the week of August 27, 2007, to review probabilistic risk assessment | |||
data and assist in identifying risk significant components, which will be reviewed during the | data and assist in identifying risk significant components, which will be reviewed during the | ||
inspection.Experience with previous baseline design inspections of similar depth and length has | inspection. | ||
and the licensee staff. | Experience with previous baseline design inspections of similar depth and length has shown | ||
that these type of inspections are extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC inspectors | |||
and the licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site and to ensure a | |||
productive inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information needed for | productive inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information needed for | ||
the inspection. | the inspection. | ||
C. Crane-2-It is important that all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize | |||
the inspection. | C. Crane -2- | ||
lead inspector. | It is important that all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the | ||
By August 10, 2007, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of | number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the on-site portions of | ||
approximately 30 high risk components. | the inspection. Insofar as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the | ||
associated with the initial selected components, should be available at the Regional | lead inspector. The information request has been divided into three groups: | ||
Office no later than August 17, 2007. | * The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities. | ||
team may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. | This information should be available to the lead inspector no later than July 30, 2007. | ||
the inspection. | By August 10, 2007, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of | ||
developed during the inspection be provided to the inspectors throughout the inspection.The lead inspector for this inspection is Ms. Patricia Lougheed. | approximately 30 high risk components. | ||
* The second group of documents requested are those items needed to support our | |||
in-office preparation activities. This set of documents, including the calculations | |||
associated with the initial selected components, should be available at the Regional | |||
Office no later than August 17, 2007. During the in-office preparation activities, the | |||
team may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. | |||
* The last group includes the additional information above as well as plant specific | |||
reference material. This information should be available to the team on the first day of | |||
the inspection. It is also requested that corrective action documents and questions | |||
developed during the inspection be provided to the inspectors throughout the inspection. | |||
The lead inspector for this inspection is Ms. Patricia Lougheed. We understand that our | |||
licensing contact for this inspection is Mr. P. Holland of your organization. If there are any | |||
questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the | questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the | ||
lead inspector at (630) 829-9760 or via e-mail at VPL@nrc.gov.In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter | lead inspector at (630) 829-9760 or via e-mail at VPL@nrc.gov. | ||
(ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html ( | In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and | ||
Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-373; 50- | its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document | ||
See Attached Distribution | Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system | ||
C. Crane-3-cc w/encl:Site Vice President - LaSalle County | (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the | ||
Regulatory Assurance Manager - LaSalle County Station | Public Electronic Reading Room). | ||
Chief Operating Officer | Sincerely, | ||
Senior Vice President - Nuclear Services | /RA/ | ||
Senior Vice President - Mid-West Regional | Ann Marie Stone, Chief | ||
Engineering Branch 2 | |||
Vice President - Mid-West Operations Support | Division of Reactor Safety | ||
Vice President - Licensing and Regulatory Affairs | Docket No. 50-373; 50-374 | ||
Director Licensing - Mid-West Regional | License No. NPF-11; NPF-18 | ||
Enclosure: Component Design Bases Inspection Document Request | |||
Manager Licensing - Clinton and LaSalle | See Attached Distribution | ||
Senior Counsel, Nuclear, Mid-West Regional | |||
C. Crane -3- | |||
Document Control Desk - Licensing | cc w/encl: Site Vice President - LaSalle County Station | ||
Assistant Attorney General | LaSalle County Station Plant Manager | ||
Illinois Emergency Management Agency | Regulatory Assurance Manager - LaSalle County Station | ||
State Liaison Officer | Chief Operating Officer | ||
Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission | Senior Vice President - Nuclear Services | ||
C. Crane-2-It is important that all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize | Senior Vice President - Mid-West Regional | ||
the inspection. | Operating Group | ||
lead inspector. | Vice President - Mid-West Operations Support | ||
By August 10, 2007, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of | Vice President - Licensing and Regulatory Affairs | ||
approximately 30 high risk components. | Director Licensing - Mid-West Regional | ||
associated with the initial selected components, should be available at the Regional | Operating Group | ||
Office no later than August 17, 2007. | Manager Licensing - Clinton and LaSalle | ||
team may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. | Senior Counsel, Nuclear, Mid-West Regional | ||
the inspection. | Operating Group | ||
developed during the inspection be provided to the inspectors throughout the inspection.The lead inspector for this inspection is Ms. Patricia Lougheed. | Document Control Desk - Licensing | ||
Assistant Attorney General | |||
Illinois Emergency Management Agency | |||
State Liaison Officer | |||
Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission | |||
C. Crane -2- | |||
It is important that all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the | |||
number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the on-site portions of | |||
the inspection. Insofar as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the | |||
lead inspector. The information request has been divided into three groups: | |||
* The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities. | |||
This information should be available to the lead inspector no later than July 30, 2007. | |||
By August 10, 2007, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of | |||
approximately 30 high risk components. | |||
* The second group of documents requested are those items needed to support our | |||
in-office preparation activities. This set of documents, including the calculations | |||
associated with the initial selected components, should be available at the Regional | |||
Office no later than August 17, 2007. During the in-office preparation activities, the | |||
team may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. | |||
* The last group includes the additional information above as well as plant specific | |||
reference material. This information should be available to the team on the first day of | |||
the inspection. It is also requested that corrective action documents and questions | |||
developed during the inspection be provided to the inspectors throughout the inspection. | |||
The lead inspector for this inspection is Ms. Patricia Lougheed. We understand that our | |||
licensing contact for this inspection is Mr. P. Holland of your organization. If there are any | |||
questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the | questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the | ||
lead inspector at (630) 829-9760 or via e-mail at VPL@nrc.gov.In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter | lead inspector at (630) 829-9760 or via e-mail at VPL@nrc.gov. | ||
(ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html ( | In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and | ||
Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-373; 50- | its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document | ||
See Attached | Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system | ||
G Publicly Available | (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the | ||
G Non-Publicly Available | Public Electronic Reading Room). | ||
G Sensitive | Sincerely, | ||
G Non- | /RA/ | ||
C. Crane-4-cc w/encl:Site Vice President - LaSalle County | Ann Marie Stone, Chief | ||
Regulatory Assurance Manager - LaSalle County Station | Engineering Branch 2 | ||
Chief Operating Officer | Division of Reactor Safety | ||
Senior Vice President - Nuclear Services | Docket No. 50-373; 50-374 | ||
Senior Vice President - Mid-West Regional | License No. NPF-11; NPF-18 | ||
Enclosure: Component Design Bases Inspection Document Request | |||
Vice President - Mid-West Operations Support | See Attached Distribution | ||
Vice President - Licensing and Regulatory Affairs | DOCUMENT NAME:C:\FileNet\ML070851385.wpd | ||
Director Licensing - Mid-West Regional | G Publicly Available G Non-Publicly Available G Sensitive G Non-Sensitive | ||
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N = No copy | |||
Manager Licensing - Clinton and LaSalle | OFFICE RIII RIII RIII RIII | ||
Senior Counsel, Nuclear, Mid-West Regional | NAME P. Lougheed S. Burgess AM Stone | ||
DATE 03/22/07 03/23/07 03/26/07 | |||
Document Control Desk - Licensing | OFFICIAL RECORD COPY | ||
Assistant Attorney General | |||
Illinois Emergency Management Agency | C. Crane -4- | ||
State Liaison Officer | cc w/encl: Site Vice President - LaSalle County Station | ||
Chairman, Illinois Commerce | LaSalle County Station Plant Manager | ||
:DXC1 | Regulatory Assurance Manager - LaSalle County Station | ||
Chief Operating Officer | |||
Senior Vice President - Nuclear Services | |||
Senior Vice President - Mid-West Regional | |||
Operating Group | |||
Vice President - Mid-West Operations Support | |||
Vice President - Licensing and Regulatory Affairs | |||
Director Licensing - Mid-West Regional | |||
Operating Group | |||
Manager Licensing - Clinton and LaSalle | |||
Senior Counsel, Nuclear, Mid-West Regional | |||
Operating Group | |||
Document Control Desk - Licensing | |||
Assistant Attorney General | |||
Illinois Emergency Management Agency | |||
State Liaison Officer | |||
Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission | |||
DISTRIBUTION: | |||
DXC1 | |||
TEB | TEB | ||
DMS6 | DMS6 | ||
Line 114: | Line 185: | ||
KGO | KGO | ||
GLS | GLS | ||
DEK | |||
CAA1 | |||
DRPIII | DRPIII | ||
DRSIII | DRSIII | ||
PLB1 | |||
TXN | |||
ROPreports@nrc.gov | ROPreports@nrc.gov | ||
COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION | |||
COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION | |||
:05000373/2007009(DRS); 05000374/2007009(DRS)Inspection Dates | INFORMATION REQUEST | ||
:August 27 through August 31, September 10 | Site: LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 | ||
:IP 71111.21, | Inspection Report: 05000373/2007009(DRS); 05000374/2007009(DRS) | ||
:Patricia Lougheed, (630) 829-9760, (VPL@nrc.gov | Inspection Dates: August 27 through August 31, September 10 through | ||
September 14; and September 24 through September 28, 2007 | |||
Inspection Procedure: IP 71111.21, Component Design Bases Inspection | |||
the lead inspector as soon as possible. | Lead Inspector: Patricia Lougheed, (630) 829-9760, (VPL@nrc.gov) | ||
or on CDROM. | I. Information Requested Prior to the On-site Information Gathering/Inspection | ||
hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use. | Week | ||
information to be easily understood by someone who has a knowledge of light water | The following information is requested by July 30, 2007, or sooner, to facilitate | ||
reactor technology).1.Provide the risk ranking of top 150 components from your site | inspection preparation. If you have any questions regarding this information, please call | ||
Include values for Birnbaum Importance, Risk Reduction Worth (RRW), and | the lead inspector as soon as possible. (Please provide the information electronically in | ||
Fussell-Veseley (FV) (as applicable). | pdf files, Excel, or other searchable formats, preferably either through electronic mail | ||
failure mode for each component.2.Provide a list of the top 200 cut-sets from your PSA. | or on CDROM. The CDROM should contain descriptive names, and be indexed and | ||
3.If you have an External Events or Fire PSA Model, provide the | hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use. Information in lists should contain enough | ||
description of each coded event (including fire, flood zone description.;4.Provide a risk ranking of operator actions from your site specific PSA sorted | information to be easily understood by someone who has a knowledge of light water | ||
6.Provide any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and | reactor technology). | ||
flow or pressure, diesel generator close to design required output, heat | 1. Provide the risk ranking of top 150 components from your site specific | ||
exchangers close to rated design heat removal etc.). | probabilistic safety analysis (PSA) sorted by Risk Achievement Worth (RAW). | ||
COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION | Include values for Birnbaum Importance, Risk Reduction Worth (RRW), and | ||
Fussell-Veseley (FV) (as applicable). If possible, list the system, train and PSA | |||
11.Provide information on any common cause failure of components experienced | failure mode for each component. | ||
selected component, especially if provided electronically (e.g., folder with | 2. Provide a list of the top 200 cut-sets from your PSA. | ||
component name that includes calculations, condition reports, maintenance | 3. If you have an External Events or Fire PSA Model, provide the information | ||
history, etc).1.Provide a list and copies of condition reports (corrective action documents)associated with each of the selected components for the last four years.2.Provide the completed corrective maintenance history associated with each | requested in Items 1 and 2 for external events and fire. Provide narrative | ||
includes completed activities and does not include routine surveillances.3.Provide copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components(if not previously provided), excluding data files. | description of each coded event (including fire, flood zone description.; | ||
and provide copies of referenced material (such as drawings, engineering | 4. Provide a risk ranking of operator actions from your site specific PSA sorted by | ||
requests, or vendor letters).4.Provide a list of modifications associated with each of the selected components. This list should include a descriptive paragraph on the purpose of the | RAW. Provide copies of your human reliability worksheets for these items. | ||
modification. | 5 Provide a list of PSA assumptions regarding operator actions. | ||
canceled) modifications.5.Provide copies of electrical single-lines and mechanical piping | 6. Provide any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and associated | ||
COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION | calculations with low design margins, (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for | ||
flow or pressure, diesel generator close to design required output, heat | |||
service testing, other vibration monitoring, oil sample results, etc., as applicable).10.Provide System Health Reports, System Descriptions, and/or Design | exchangers close to rated design heat removal etc.). | ||
operator actions.14.Provide a copy of any engineering or operations related audits completed in | 1 Enclosure | ||
shadows.16.Provide electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, | |||
The lead inspectors may request hard copies of information provided | COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION | ||
electronically, especially drawings and calculations. | INFORMATION REQUEST | ||
7. Provide a list of available design (setup) margins for valves in the | |||
motor-operated valve (MOV) and air-operated valve (AOV) programs. | |||
*Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.); and | 8. Provide a list of high risk Maintenance Rule systems/components based on | ||
*Vendor manuals.4.Please arrange for an overview walkdown of the selected components. | engineering or expert panel judgement. | ||
normally accessible, please arrange for a briefing on what conditions prevent | 9. Provide a list of structures, systems, or components (SSCs) in the Maintenance | ||
access to the components.5.If plant information, such as corrective action documents or procedures, | Rule (a)(1) category. | ||
inspectors, along with simple instructions.IV.Information Requested to be provided throughout the | 10. Provide the site top ten issues list (if applicable). | ||
licensee-identified corrective action documents generated while answering an | 11. Provide information on any common cause failure of components experienced in | ||
inspector question. | the last five years at your facility. | ||
the lead inspector. | 12. Provide a list of Root Cause Evaluations associated with component failures or | ||
inspector with a complete list of all corrective action documents generated as a | design issues initiated or completed in the last five years. | ||
result of the inspection. | II. Information requested (for the approximately 30 selected components) to be | ||
least a copy of his/her open questions, while the lead inspector should receive a | available by August 17, 2007. This information should be separated for each | ||
complete list. | selected component, especially if provided electronically (e.g., folder with | ||
with a complete electronic copy of the database.If you have questions regarding any of the information requested, please contact the | component name that includes calculations, condition reports, maintenance | ||
history, etc). | |||
1. Provide a list and copies of condition reports (corrective action documents) | |||
associated with each of the selected components for the last four years. | |||
2. Provide the completed corrective maintenance history associated with each of | |||
the selected components for the last four years. Please ensure this list only | |||
includes completed activities and does not include routine surveillances. | |||
3. Provide copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components | |||
(if not previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations | |||
and provide copies of referenced material (such as drawings, engineering | |||
requests, or vendor letters). | |||
4. Provide a list of modifications associated with each of the selected components. | |||
This list should include a descriptive paragraph on the purpose of the | |||
modification. Please ensure this list only includes design completed (not | |||
canceled) modifications. | |||
5. Provide copies of electrical single-lines and mechanical piping and | |||
instrumentation drawings. | |||
6. Provide copies of operability evaluations associated with each of the selected | |||
components and plans for restoring operability, if applicable. | |||
2 Enclosure | |||
COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION | |||
INFORMATION REQUEST | |||
7. Provide copies of any operator work-around evaluations associated with each of | |||
the selected components and plans for resolution, if applicable. | |||
8. Provide copies of any open temporary modifications associated with each of the | |||
selected components, if applicable. | |||
9. Provide trend data on the selected electrical/mechanical components | |||
performance for last three years (For example, pumps performance including in- | |||
service testing, other vibration monitoring, oil sample results, etc., as applicable). | |||
10. Provide System Health Reports, System Descriptions, and/or Design Basis | |||
Documents that are associated with each of the selected components. | |||
11. Provide copies of operating experience evaluations associated with the selected | |||
components for the last three years. | |||
12. Provide copies of any simulator scenarios, lesson plans, or job performance | |||
measures for the selected operator actions. | |||
13. Provide copies of the emergency operating procedures, normal and abnormal | |||
operating procedures and any alarm response procedures for the selected | |||
operator actions. | |||
14. Provide a copy of any engineering or operations related audits completed in the | |||
last two years which addressed the selected components. | |||
15. Provide a copy of the current management and engineering organizational chart. | |||
Highlight or otherwise provide the names of any inspection contacts or inspector | |||
shadows. | |||
16. Provide electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical | |||
Specifications, Technical Specifications Bases, and Technical Requirements | |||
Manual; if available. | |||
17. Provide a copy of any internal/external self-assessments and associated | |||
corrective action documents generated in preparation for the inspection. | |||
III. Additional Information to be Provided on August 27, 2007 On-site (for final 15 - 20 | |||
selected components) | |||
1. A request for any additional information needed will be provided during the week | |||
of August 20, 2007. The lead inspector will provide a list of added information. | |||
The lead inspectors may request hard copies of information provided | |||
electronically, especially drawings and calculations. | |||
3 Enclosure | |||
2. One complete set of piping and instrumentation drawings (P&IDs) and one-line | |||
electrical drawings (paper copies) | |||
3. The following background materials may be requested. It is recommended that | |||
these materials be identified and located prior to the inspection: | |||
* IPE/PRA report; | |||
* Procurement documents for components selected; | |||
* Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.); and | |||
* Vendor manuals. | |||
4. Please arrange for an overview walkdown of the selected components. This | |||
should include any required radiological briefings. For any components not | |||
normally accessible, please arrange for a briefing on what conditions prevent | |||
access to the components. | |||
5. If plant information, such as corrective action documents or procedures, is | |||
available electronically onsite, please consider providing access for the | |||
inspectors, along with simple instructions. | |||
IV. Information Requested to be provided throughout the inspection | |||
1 Provide copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of | |||
the teams questions or queries during this inspection. This includes and | |||
licensee-identified corrective action documents generated while answering an | |||
inspector question. Please provide two copies: one to the inspector and one to | |||
the lead inspector. At the end of the inspection, please provide the lead | |||
inspector with a complete list of all corrective action documents generated as a | |||
result of the inspection. | |||
2 Provide copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the | |||
status/resolution of the information requested. Each inspector should receive at | |||
least a copy of his/her open questions, while the lead inspector should receive a | |||
complete list. At the end of the inspection, please provide the lead inspector | |||
with a complete electronic copy of the database. | |||
If you have questions regarding any of the information requested, please contact the lead | |||
inspector. | |||
4 Enclosusre | |||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 08:02, 23 November 2019
ML070851385 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | LaSalle |
Issue date: | 03/26/2007 |
From: | Ann Marie Stone NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB2 |
To: | Crane C Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear |
References | |
IR-07-009 IR-07-009 | |
Download: ML070851385 (9) | |
See also: IR 05000373/2007009
Text
March 26,2007
Mr. Christopher M. Crane
President and Chief Nuclear Officer
Exelon Nuclear
Exelon Generation Company, LLC
4300 Winfield Road
Warrenville, IL 60555
SUBJECT: LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 - INFORMATION REQUEST
FOR AN NRC BIENNIAL BASELINE COMPONENT DESIGN BASES
INSPECTION 05000373/2007009(DRS); 05000374/2007009(DRS)
Dear Mr. Crane:
On August 27, 2007, the NRC will begin a biennial baseline Component Design Bases
Inspection (CDBI) at the LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2. This inspection will be
performed in accordance with revised NRC Baseline Inspection Procedure (IP) 71111.21 and
replaces the biennial Safety System Design and Performance Capability Inspection.
The CDBI inspection focuses on components which have high risk and low design margins.
The components to be reviewed during this baseline inspection will be identified during an
in-office preparation week prior to the first week of the on-site inspection. In addition, a number
of risk significant operator actions and operating experience issues, associated with the
component samples, will also be selected for review.
The inspection will include 3 weeks on-site, including the information gathering during the first
on-site week. The inspection team will consist of six NRC inspectors, of whom five will focus on
engineering and one on operations. The current inspection schedule is as follows:
- August 27 through August 31, 2007;
- September 10 through September 14, 2007; and
- September 24 through September 28, 2007.
The team will be preparing for the inspection, mainly during the week of August 20, 2007, as
discussed in the attached enclosure. A Region III Senior Reactor Analyst may accompany the
inspection team during the week of August 27, 2007, to review probabilistic risk assessment
data and assist in identifying risk significant components, which will be reviewed during the
inspection.
Experience with previous baseline design inspections of similar depth and length has shown
that these type of inspections are extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC inspectors
and the licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site and to ensure a
productive inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information needed for
the inspection.
C. Crane -2-
It is important that all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the
number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the on-site portions of
the inspection. Insofar as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the
lead inspector. The information request has been divided into three groups:
- The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities.
This information should be available to the lead inspector no later than July 30, 2007.
By August 10, 2007, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of
approximately 30 high risk components.
- The second group of documents requested are those items needed to support our
in-office preparation activities. This set of documents, including the calculations
associated with the initial selected components, should be available at the Regional
Office no later than August 17, 2007. During the in-office preparation activities, the
team may identify additional information needed to support the inspection.
- The last group includes the additional information above as well as plant specific
reference material. This information should be available to the team on the first day of
the inspection. It is also requested that corrective action documents and questions
developed during the inspection be provided to the inspectors throughout the inspection.
The lead inspector for this inspection is Ms. Patricia Lougheed. We understand that our
licensing contact for this inspection is Mr. P. Holland of your organization. If there are any
questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the
lead inspector at (630) 829-9760 or via e-mail at VPL@nrc.gov.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and
its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document
Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system
(ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the
Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Ann Marie Stone, Chief
Engineering Branch 2
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket No. 50-373; 50-374
Enclosure: Component Design Bases Inspection Document Request
See Attached Distribution
C. Crane -3-
cc w/encl: Site Vice President - LaSalle County Station
LaSalle County Station Plant Manager
Regulatory Assurance Manager - LaSalle County Station
Chief Operating Officer
Senior Vice President - Nuclear Services
Senior Vice President - Mid-West Regional
Operating Group
Vice President - Mid-West Operations Support
Vice President - Licensing and Regulatory Affairs
Director Licensing - Mid-West Regional
Operating Group
Manager Licensing - Clinton and LaSalle
Senior Counsel, Nuclear, Mid-West Regional
Operating Group
Document Control Desk - Licensing
Assistant Attorney General
Illinois Emergency Management Agency
State Liaison Officer
Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission
C. Crane -2-
It is important that all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the
number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the on-site portions of
the inspection. Insofar as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the
lead inspector. The information request has been divided into three groups:
- The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities.
This information should be available to the lead inspector no later than July 30, 2007.
By August 10, 2007, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of
approximately 30 high risk components.
- The second group of documents requested are those items needed to support our
in-office preparation activities. This set of documents, including the calculations
associated with the initial selected components, should be available at the Regional
Office no later than August 17, 2007. During the in-office preparation activities, the
team may identify additional information needed to support the inspection.
- The last group includes the additional information above as well as plant specific
reference material. This information should be available to the team on the first day of
the inspection. It is also requested that corrective action documents and questions
developed during the inspection be provided to the inspectors throughout the inspection.
The lead inspector for this inspection is Ms. Patricia Lougheed. We understand that our
licensing contact for this inspection is Mr. P. Holland of your organization. If there are any
questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the
lead inspector at (630) 829-9760 or via e-mail at VPL@nrc.gov.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and
its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document
Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system
(ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the
Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Ann Marie Stone, Chief
Engineering Branch 2
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket No. 50-373; 50-374
Enclosure: Component Design Bases Inspection Document Request
See Attached Distribution
DOCUMENT NAME:C:\FileNet\ML070851385.wpd
G Publicly Available G Non-Publicly Available G Sensitive G Non-Sensitive
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N = No copy
OFFICE RIII RIII RIII RIII
NAME P. Lougheed S. Burgess AM Stone
DATE 03/22/07 03/23/07 03/26/07
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
C. Crane -4-
cc w/encl: Site Vice President - LaSalle County Station
LaSalle County Station Plant Manager
Regulatory Assurance Manager - LaSalle County Station
Chief Operating Officer
Senior Vice President - Nuclear Services
Senior Vice President - Mid-West Regional
Operating Group
Vice President - Mid-West Operations Support
Vice President - Licensing and Regulatory Affairs
Director Licensing - Mid-West Regional
Operating Group
Manager Licensing - Clinton and LaSalle
Senior Counsel, Nuclear, Mid-West Regional
Operating Group
Document Control Desk - Licensing
Assistant Attorney General
Illinois Emergency Management Agency
State Liaison Officer
Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission
DISTRIBUTION:
DXC1
TEB
DMS6
RidsNrrDirsIrib
GEG
KGO
GLS
CAA1
DRPIII
DRSIII
PLB1
TXN
ROPreports@nrc.gov
COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
INFORMATION REQUEST
Site: LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2
Inspection Report: 05000373/2007009(DRS); 05000374/2007009(DRS)
Inspection Dates: August 27 through August 31, September 10 through
September 14; and September 24 through September 28, 2007
Inspection Procedure: IP 71111.21, Component Design Bases Inspection
Lead Inspector: Patricia Lougheed, (630) 829-9760, (VPL@nrc.gov)
I. Information Requested Prior to the On-site Information Gathering/Inspection
Week
The following information is requested by July 30, 2007, or sooner, to facilitate
inspection preparation. If you have any questions regarding this information, please call
the lead inspector as soon as possible. (Please provide the information electronically in
pdf files, Excel, or other searchable formats, preferably either through electronic mail
or on CDROM. The CDROM should contain descriptive names, and be indexed and
hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use. Information in lists should contain enough
information to be easily understood by someone who has a knowledge of light water
reactor technology).
1. Provide the risk ranking of top 150 components from your site specific
probabilistic safety analysis (PSA) sorted by Risk Achievement Worth (RAW).
Include values for Birnbaum Importance, Risk Reduction Worth (RRW), and
Fussell-Veseley (FV) (as applicable). If possible, list the system, train and PSA
failure mode for each component.
2. Provide a list of the top 200 cut-sets from your PSA.
3. If you have an External Events or Fire PSA Model, provide the information
requested in Items 1 and 2 for external events and fire. Provide narrative
description of each coded event (including fire, flood zone description.;
4. Provide a risk ranking of operator actions from your site specific PSA sorted by
RAW. Provide copies of your human reliability worksheets for these items.
5 Provide a list of PSA assumptions regarding operator actions.
6. Provide any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and associated
calculations with low design margins, (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for
flow or pressure, diesel generator close to design required output, heat
exchangers close to rated design heat removal etc.).
1 Enclosure
COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
INFORMATION REQUEST
7. Provide a list of available design (setup) margins for valves in the
motor-operated valve (MOV) and air-operated valve (AOV) programs.
8. Provide a list of high risk Maintenance Rule systems/components based on
engineering or expert panel judgement.
9. Provide a list of structures, systems, or components (SSCs) in the Maintenance
Rule (a)(1) category.
10. Provide the site top ten issues list (if applicable).
11. Provide information on any common cause failure of components experienced in
the last five years at your facility.
12. Provide a list of Root Cause Evaluations associated with component failures or
design issues initiated or completed in the last five years.
II. Information requested (for the approximately 30 selected components) to be
available by August 17, 2007. This information should be separated for each
selected component, especially if provided electronically (e.g., folder with
component name that includes calculations, condition reports, maintenance
history, etc).
1. Provide a list and copies of condition reports (corrective action documents)
associated with each of the selected components for the last four years.
2. Provide the completed corrective maintenance history associated with each of
the selected components for the last four years. Please ensure this list only
includes completed activities and does not include routine surveillances.
3. Provide copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components
(if not previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations
and provide copies of referenced material (such as drawings, engineering
requests, or vendor letters).
4. Provide a list of modifications associated with each of the selected components.
This list should include a descriptive paragraph on the purpose of the
modification. Please ensure this list only includes design completed (not
canceled) modifications.
5. Provide copies of electrical single-lines and mechanical piping and
instrumentation drawings.
6. Provide copies of operability evaluations associated with each of the selected
components and plans for restoring operability, if applicable.
2 Enclosure
COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
INFORMATION REQUEST
7. Provide copies of any operator work-around evaluations associated with each of
the selected components and plans for resolution, if applicable.
8. Provide copies of any open temporary modifications associated with each of the
selected components, if applicable.
9. Provide trend data on the selected electrical/mechanical components
performance for last three years (For example, pumps performance including in-
service testing, other vibration monitoring, oil sample results, etc., as applicable).
10. Provide System Health Reports, System Descriptions, and/or Design Basis
Documents that are associated with each of the selected components.
11. Provide copies of operating experience evaluations associated with the selected
components for the last three years.
12. Provide copies of any simulator scenarios, lesson plans, or job performance
measures for the selected operator actions.
13. Provide copies of the emergency operating procedures, normal and abnormal
operating procedures and any alarm response procedures for the selected
operator actions.
14. Provide a copy of any engineering or operations related audits completed in the
last two years which addressed the selected components.
15. Provide a copy of the current management and engineering organizational chart.
Highlight or otherwise provide the names of any inspection contacts or inspector
shadows.
16. Provide electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical
Specifications, Technical Specifications Bases, and Technical Requirements
Manual; if available.
17. Provide a copy of any internal/external self-assessments and associated
corrective action documents generated in preparation for the inspection.
III. Additional Information to be Provided on August 27, 2007 On-site (for final 15 - 20
selected components)
1. A request for any additional information needed will be provided during the week
of August 20, 2007. The lead inspector will provide a list of added information.
The lead inspectors may request hard copies of information provided
electronically, especially drawings and calculations.
3 Enclosure
2. One complete set of piping and instrumentation drawings (P&IDs) and one-line
electrical drawings (paper copies)
3. The following background materials may be requested. It is recommended that
these materials be identified and located prior to the inspection:
- IPE/PRA report;
- Procurement documents for components selected;
- Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.); and
- Vendor manuals.
4. Please arrange for an overview walkdown of the selected components. This
should include any required radiological briefings. For any components not
normally accessible, please arrange for a briefing on what conditions prevent
access to the components.
5. If plant information, such as corrective action documents or procedures, is
available electronically onsite, please consider providing access for the
inspectors, along with simple instructions.
IV. Information Requested to be provided throughout the inspection
1 Provide copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of
the teams questions or queries during this inspection. This includes and
licensee-identified corrective action documents generated while answering an
inspector question. Please provide two copies: one to the inspector and one to
the lead inspector. At the end of the inspection, please provide the lead
inspector with a complete list of all corrective action documents generated as a
result of the inspection.
2 Provide copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the
status/resolution of the information requested. Each inspector should receive at
least a copy of his/her open questions, while the lead inspector should receive a
complete list. At the end of the inspection, please provide the lead inspector
with a complete electronic copy of the database.
If you have questions regarding any of the information requested, please contact the lead
inspector.
4 Enclosusre