ML100480077: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:February 17, 2010 MEMORANDUM TO: File  
{{#Wiki_filter:February 17, 2010 MEMORANDUM TO:         File FROM:                   Samuel Cuadrado De Jesús, Project Manager       /RA/
 
Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
FROM: Samuel Cuadrado De Jesús, Project Manager /RA/ Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation  


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
DOCKETING OF FEBRUARY 2, 2010 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION TELECONFERENCE NOTES PERTAINING TO THE LICENSE RENEWAL OF THE DUANE ARNOLD ENERGY CENTER This Note to File makes the following enclosed correspondence publicly available: NRC License Renewal Teleconference - February 2, 2010
DOCKETING OF FEBRUARY 2, 2010 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION TELECONFERENCE NOTES PERTAINING TO THE LICENSE RENEWAL OF THE DUANE ARNOLD ENERGY CENTER This Note to File makes the following enclosed correspondence publicly available:
NRC License Renewal Teleconference - February 2, 2010


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==


As stated
As stated
 
ML100480077 OFFICE PM:RPB1:DLR PM:RPB1:DLR NAME BHarris SCuadradoDeJesus DATE 02/17/10 02/17/10 ENCLOSURE Summary of Discussion with NRC Date  2/2/2010 Time  1:00 PM CST


Location:   Telephone Participants:
ML100480077 OFFICE        PM:RPB1:DLR          PM:RPB1:DLR NAME          BHarris              SCuadradoDeJesus DATE          02/17/10              02/17/10
NRC      FPLE/DAEC    Sam CuadradoDeJesus    Ken Putnam Jim Medoff      Clara Rushworth Ganesh Cheruvenki    Bill Bryant Rachael Vaucher    Bob Vincent


Topic: License renewal questions from NRC review of LRA and RAI responses  
Summary of Discussion with NRC Date 2/2/2010 Time 1:00 PM CST Location: Telephone Participants:
NRC                                            FPLE/DAEC Sam CuadradoDeJesus                                  Ken Putnam Jim Medoff                                          Clara Rushworth Ganesh Cheruvenki                                    Bill Bryant Rachael Vaucher                                      Bob Vincent Topic: License renewal questions from NRC review of LRA and RAI responses


==References:==
==References:==
BWRVIP-25  
BWRVIP-25 Main Points of Discussion:
 
Main Points of Discussion:
Core Rim Hold-down Bolts Reviewer discussed NRC's quandary related to DAEC's inability to perform hold-down bolt inspections in accordance with BWRVIP-25. The Staff has discussed the issue with the BWRVIP organization and understands the issue has to be resolved generically. They believe VIP should propose an alternate inspection or revise BWRVIP-25 with some other resolution, but this may not be timely for license renewal for DAEC. A commitment related to BWRVIP-25 will need to be defined after the NRC has further discussion with BWRVIP related to current term issues with BWRVIP-25.
Core Rim Hold-down Bolts Reviewer discussed NRC's quandary related to DAEC's inability to perform hold-down bolt inspections in accordance with BWRVIP-25. The Staff has discussed the issue with the BWRVIP organization and understands the issue has to be resolved generically. They believe VIP should propose an alternate inspection or revise BWRVIP-25 with some other resolution, but this may not be timely for license renewal for DAEC. A commitment related to BWRVIP-25 will need to be defined after the NRC has further discussion with BWRVIP related to current term issues with BWRVIP-25.
Action: NRC will discuss need for BWRVIP-25 update and options for DAEC license renewal with Matt Mitchell (Branch Chief, Vessels & Internals Branch). A follow-up phone conversation will be held in a few days.  
Action: NRC will discuss need for BWRVIP-25 update and options for DAEC license renewal with Matt Mitchell (Branch Chief, Vessels & Internals Branch). A follow-up phone conversation will be held in a few days.
 
CRD Return Line Nozzle Safe End Reviewer discussed concern with the CRD Return Line Nozzle Safe End being addressed under the CRD Return Line Nozzle Program rather than the Stress Corrosion Cracking Program as specified in GALL. Staff questioned whether the exams performed on safe end welds under CRD Return Line Nozzle Program were equivalent to exams that would be performed under SCC Program.
CRD Return Line Nozzle Safe End Reviewer discussed concern with the CRD Return Line Nozzle Safe End being addressed under the CRD Return Line Nozzle Program rather than the Stress Corrosion Cracking Program as specified in GALL. Staff questioned whether the exams performed on safe end welds under CRD Return Line Nozzle Program were equivalent to exams that would be performed under SCC Program.  
DAEC confirmed that the safe end welds were examined using UT and did not rely on surface examination. It was indicated that the configuration of this line was discussed in a previous RAI response, and the specific date of the response letter would be provided following the conference call.
 
ENCLOSURE
DAEC confirmed that the safe end welds were examined using UT and did not rely on surface examination. It was indicated that the configuration of this line was discussed in a previous RAI response, and the specific date of the response letter would be provided following the conference call. Following the call it was determined that the DAEC responses regarding the CRD Return Line configuration were provided in a letter dated October 13, 2009, in response to RAIs B.3.8-01 and B.3.8-02. The response to RAI B.3.8-02 indicates that the return line is ultrasonically examined.
DAEC also noted that the NRC's email dated January 28 questioned why the change to the CRD Safe End line item in LRA Table 3.1.2-1 (letter dated January 14, 2010) did not list the Water Chemistry Program in addition to the BWR Control Rod Drive Return Line Nozzle Program. DAEC responded that not listing the program was an oversight, and that the Water Chemistry Program would be added to this line item in the LRA.
 
Action:  DAEC to add Water Chemistry Program to CRD Safe End line item (Table 3.1.2-1 on page 3.1-55) as a second AMP for managing cracking. Change to be provided in an upcoming letter expected to be issued in February.
 
Actions:  FPLE/DAEC As noted above.


Following the call it was determined that the DAEC responses regarding the CRD Return Line configuration were provided in a letter dated October 13, 2009, in response to RAIs B.3.8-01 and B.3.8-02. The response to RAI B.3.8-02 indicates that the return line is ultrasonically examined.
DAEC also noted that the NRC's email dated January 28 questioned why the change to the CRD Safe End line item in LRA Table 3.1.2-1 (letter dated January 14, 2010) did not list the Water Chemistry Program in addition to the BWR Control Rod Drive Return Line Nozzle Program. DAEC responded that not listing the program was an oversight, and that the Water Chemistry Program would be added to this line item in the LRA.
Action: DAEC to add Water Chemistry Program to CRD Safe End line item (Table 3.1.2-1 on page 3.1-55) as a second AMP for managing cracking. Change to be provided in an upcoming letter expected to be issued in February.
Actions:
FPLE/DAEC As noted above.
NRC As noted above.
NRC As noted above.
Summary: N/A Disposition of Summary of Discussion with NRC:
Summary: N/A Disposition of Summary of Discussion with NRC:
: 1) Summary for internal use     _____ 2) Meeting summary with copy provided to NRC __X
: 1)     Summary for internal use                                   _____
: 3) Docketed letter related to meeting}}
: 2)     Meeting summary with copy provided to NRC                   __X
: 3)     Docketed letter related to meeting}}

Latest revision as of 21:47, 13 November 2019

Docketing of February 2, 2010 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Conference Notes Pertaining to the License Renewal of the Duane Arnold Energy Center
ML100480077
Person / Time
Site: Duane Arnold NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/17/2010
From: Cuadradodejesus S
License Renewal Projects Branch 1
To:
License Renewal Projects Branch 1
CuadradoDeJesus S, NRR/DLR, 415-2946
References
Download: ML100480077 (4)
v • d • e


Text

February 17, 2010 MEMORANDUM TO: File FROM: Samuel Cuadrado De Jesús, Project Manager /RA/

Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

SUBJECT:

DOCKETING OF FEBRUARY 2, 2010 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION TELECONFERENCE NOTES PERTAINING TO THE LICENSE RENEWAL OF THE DUANE ARNOLD ENERGY CENTER This Note to File makes the following enclosed correspondence publicly available:

NRC License Renewal Teleconference - February 2, 2010

Enclosure:

As stated

ML100480077 OFFICE PM:RPB1:DLR PM:RPB1:DLR NAME BHarris SCuadradoDeJesus DATE 02/17/10 02/17/10

Summary of Discussion with NRC Date 2/2/2010 Time 1:00 PM CST Location: Telephone Participants:

NRC FPLE/DAEC Sam CuadradoDeJesus Ken Putnam Jim Medoff Clara Rushworth Ganesh Cheruvenki Bill Bryant Rachael Vaucher Bob Vincent Topic: License renewal questions from NRC review of LRA and RAI responses

References:

BWRVIP-25 Main Points of Discussion:

Core Rim Hold-down Bolts Reviewer discussed NRC's quandary related to DAEC's inability to perform hold-down bolt inspections in accordance with BWRVIP-25. The Staff has discussed the issue with the BWRVIP organization and understands the issue has to be resolved generically. They believe VIP should propose an alternate inspection or revise BWRVIP-25 with some other resolution, but this may not be timely for license renewal for DAEC. A commitment related to BWRVIP-25 will need to be defined after the NRC has further discussion with BWRVIP related to current term issues with BWRVIP-25.

Action: NRC will discuss need for BWRVIP-25 update and options for DAEC license renewal with Matt Mitchell (Branch Chief, Vessels & Internals Branch). A follow-up phone conversation will be held in a few days.

CRD Return Line Nozzle Safe End Reviewer discussed concern with the CRD Return Line Nozzle Safe End being addressed under the CRD Return Line Nozzle Program rather than the Stress Corrosion Cracking Program as specified in GALL. Staff questioned whether the exams performed on safe end welds under CRD Return Line Nozzle Program were equivalent to exams that would be performed under SCC Program.

DAEC confirmed that the safe end welds were examined using UT and did not rely on surface examination. It was indicated that the configuration of this line was discussed in a previous RAI response, and the specific date of the response letter would be provided following the conference call.

ENCLOSURE

Following the call it was determined that the DAEC responses regarding the CRD Return Line configuration were provided in a letter dated October 13, 2009, in response to RAIs B.3.8-01 and B.3.8-02. The response to RAI B.3.8-02 indicates that the return line is ultrasonically examined.

DAEC also noted that the NRC's email dated January 28 questioned why the change to the CRD Safe End line item in LRA Table 3.1.2-1 (letter dated January 14, 2010) did not list the Water Chemistry Program in addition to the BWR Control Rod Drive Return Line Nozzle Program. DAEC responded that not listing the program was an oversight, and that the Water Chemistry Program would be added to this line item in the LRA.

Action: DAEC to add Water Chemistry Program to CRD Safe End line item (Table 3.1.2-1 on page 3.1-55) as a second AMP for managing cracking. Change to be provided in an upcoming letter expected to be issued in February.

Actions:

FPLE/DAEC As noted above.

NRC As noted above.

Summary: N/A Disposition of Summary of Discussion with NRC:

1) Summary for internal use _____
2) Meeting summary with copy provided to NRC __X
3) Docketed letter related to meeting
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML100480077&oldid=2137076"