ML101050090: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Orf, Tracy Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 9:29 AM To: Orf, Tracy  
{{#Wiki_filter:From:                       Orf, Tracy Sent:                       Thursday, April 15, 2010 9:29 AM To:                         Orf, Tracy


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review From: Orf, Tracy Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 9:26 AM To: Curt Castell  
Acceptance Review From: Orf, Tracy Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 9:26 AM To: Curt Castell


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance of Progress Energy Application dated March 5, 2010 on H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant Unit No. 2 Technical Specification 3.3.2 Engineered Safety Features Actuation System (ESFAS) Instrumentation and Section 3.3.6, TAC NO. ME3507 By letter dated March 5, 2010, (ML100710678), Progress Energy submitted a request to revise the Technical Specifications (TS), to Facility Operating License No. DPR-23 for the H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant Unit 2. The changes would add notes to Technical Specification (TS) 3.3.2 Conditions D and E to allow a channel to be taken out of its required trip condition in order to support maintenance activities to restore channel operability. In addition, an editorial change is proposed for Table 3.3.6.1 to correct the function reference provided for the safety injection function.
Acceptance of Progress Energy Application dated March 5, 2010 on H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant Unit No. 2 Technical Specification 3.3.2 Engineered Safety Features Actuation System (ESFAS) Instrumentation and Section 3.3.6, TAC NO. ME3507 By letter dated March 5, 2010, (ML100710678), Progress Energy submitted a request to revise the Technical Specifications (TS), to Facility Operating License No. DPR-23 for the H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant Unit 2. The changes would add notes to Technical Specification (TS) 3.3.2 Conditions D and E to allow a channel to be taken out of its required trip condition in order to support maintenance activities to restore channel operability. In addition, an editorial change is proposed for Table 3.3.6.1 to correct the function reference provided for the safety injection function.
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this application. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.  
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this application. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
 
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the Progress Energys request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence Tracy J. Orf, Project Manager St. Lucie EPU & H.B. Robinson Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Phone: (301) 415-2788 Docket No.: 50-261 E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (AB7F52B9BFE4CE4EAFCD1B45F02BEA4F355ECC6AA7)
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the Progress Energy's request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence Tracy J. Orf, Project Manager St. Lucie EPU & H.B. Robinson Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Phone: (301) 415-2788 Docket No.: 50-261 E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (AB7F52B9BFE4CE4EAFCD1B45F02BEA4F355ECC6AA7)  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review Sent Date:        4/15/2010 9:28:44 AM Received Date:        4/15/2010 9:28:44 AM From:                Orf, Tracy
Acceptance Review
 
Created By:        Tracy.Orf@nrc.gov


Recipients:
Sent Date:    4/15/2010 9:28:44 AM Received Date:      4/15/2010 9:28:44 AM From:          Orf, Tracy Created By:      Tracy.Orf@nrc.gov Recipients:
Tracy.Orf@nrc.gov (Orf, Tracy)
Tracy.Orf@nrc.gov (Orf, Tracy)
Tracking Status: None  
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
 
HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov Files         Size     Date & Time MESSAGE         12105       4/15/2010 Options Expiration Date:
Post Office:
Priority:               olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested:        False Return Notification:     False Sensitivity:     olNormal Recipients received:}}
HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov  
 
Files               Size       Date & Time  
 
MESSAGE       12105       4/15/2010  
 
Options Expiration Date:
Priority:                       olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested:        False Return Notification:       False  
 
Sensitivity:         olNormal Recipients received:}}

Latest revision as of 20:50, 13 November 2019

Acceptance of Progress Energy Application Dated March 5, 2010 on H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant Unit No. 2 Technical Specification 3.3.2 Engineered Safety Features Actuation System (ESFAS) Instrumentation and Section 3.3.6, TAC No. ME3
ML101050090
Person / Time
Site: Robinson Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/15/2010
From: Orf T
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Castell C
Progress Energy Carolinas
Orf, T J, NRR/DORL/301-415-2788
References
TAC ME3507
Download: ML101050090 (2)
v • d • e


Text

From: Orf, Tracy Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 9:29 AM To: Orf, Tracy

Subject:

Acceptance Review From: Orf, Tracy Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 9:26 AM To: Curt Castell

Subject:

Acceptance of Progress Energy Application dated March 5, 2010 on H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant Unit No. 2 Technical Specification 3.3.2 Engineered Safety Features Actuation System (ESFAS) Instrumentation and Section 3.3.6, TAC NO. ME3507 By letter dated March 5, 2010, (ML100710678), Progress Energy submitted a request to revise the Technical Specifications (TS), to Facility Operating License No. DPR-23 for the H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant Unit 2. The changes would add notes to Technical Specification (TS) 3.3.2 Conditions D and E to allow a channel to be taken out of its required trip condition in order to support maintenance activities to restore channel operability. In addition, an editorial change is proposed for Table 3.3.6.1 to correct the function reference provided for the safety injection function.

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this application. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the Progress Energys request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence Tracy J. Orf, Project Manager St. Lucie EPU & H.B. Robinson Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Phone: (301) 415-2788 Docket No.: 50-261 E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (AB7F52B9BFE4CE4EAFCD1B45F02BEA4F355ECC6AA7)

Subject:

Acceptance Review

Sent Date: 4/15/2010 9:28:44 AM Received Date: 4/15/2010 9:28:44 AM From: Orf, Tracy Created By: Tracy.Orf@nrc.gov Recipients:

Tracy.Orf@nrc.gov (Orf, Tracy)

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 12105 4/15/2010 Options Expiration Date:

Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML101050090&oldid=2134601"