ML101200492: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 04/30/2010
| issue date = 04/30/2010
| title = Acceptance Review for FitzPatrick TAC No. ME3787
| title = Acceptance Review for FitzPatrick TAC No. ME3787
| author name = Pickett D V
| author name = Pickett D
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LCPAB
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LCPAB
| addressee name = Dorman E
| addressee name = Dorman E
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Pickett, Douglas Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 2:32 PM To: 'edorman@entergy.com' Cc: Lingam, Siva; Feintuch, Karl; Johnson, Don; Norris, Michael; Anderson, Joseph; Salgado, Nancy; Vaidya, Bhalchandra  
{{#Wiki_filter:From:                     Pickett, Douglas Sent:                     Friday, April 30, 2010 2:32 PM To:                       'edorman@entergy.com' Cc:                       Lingam, Siva; Feintuch, Karl; Johnson, Don; Norris, Michael; Anderson, Joseph; Salgado, Nancy; Vaidya, Bhalchandra


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review for FitzPatrick TAC No. ME3787 Mr. Dorman:
Acceptance Review for FitzPatrick TAC No. ME3787 Mr. Dorman:
By letter dated April 8, 2010 (TAC No. ME3787), Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. submitted a request to convert the Emergency Action Level scheme from NUMARC/NESP-007, Rev 2, to the standard set forth in NEI 99-01, Rev 5, for the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant.
By letter dated April 8, 2010 (TAC No. ME3787), Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. submitted a request to convert the Emergency Action Level scheme from NUMARC/NESP-007, Rev 2, to the standard set forth in NEI 99-01, Rev 5, for the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant.
 
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff=s acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff=s acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.  
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concludes that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposal in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
 
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concludes that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposal in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.  
 
Please contact me if you have any questions. A copy of this email will be made publicly available in ADAMS.
Please contact me if you have any questions. A copy of this email will be made publicly available in ADAMS.
Sincerely, Douglas V. Pickett, Senior Project Manager Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-1364 Email: douglas.pickett@nrc.gov E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()  
Sincerely, Douglas V. Pickett, Senior Project Manager Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-1364 Email: douglas.pickett@nrc.gov E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review for FitzPatrick TAC No. ME3787 Sent Date:       04/30/2010 2:20:36 PM Received Date:       04/30/2010 2:31:00 PM From:               Pickett, Douglas  
Acceptance Review for FitzPatrick TAC No. ME3787 Sent Date:       04/30/2010 2:20:36 PM Received Date:         04/30/2010 2:31:00 PM From:             Pickett, Douglas Created By:        Douglas.Pickett@nrc.gov


Created By:        Douglas.Pickett@nrc.gov Recipients:
Recipients:
edorman@entergy.com ('edorman@entergy.com')
edorman@entergy.com ('edorman@entergy.com')
Tracking Status: None Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov (Lingam, Siva)
Tracking Status: None Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov (Lingam, Siva)
Tracking Status: None  
Tracking Status: None Karl.Feintuch@nrc.gov (Feintuch, Karl)
 
Tracking Status: None Don.Johnson@nrc.gov (Johnson, Don)
Karl.Feintuch@nrc.gov (Feintuch, Karl)                 Tracking Status: None Don.Johnson@nrc.gov (Johnson, Don)
Tracking Status: None Michael.Norris@nrc.gov (Norris, Michael)
Tracking Status: None Michael.Norris@nrc.gov (Norris, Michael)
Tracking Status: None Joseph.Anderson@nrc.gov (Anderson, Joseph)
Tracking Status: None Joseph.Anderson@nrc.gov (Anderson, Joseph)
Tracking Status: None Nancy.Salgado@nrc.gov (Salgado, Nancy)
Tracking Status: None Nancy.Salgado@nrc.gov (Salgado, Nancy)
Tracking Status: None Bhalchandra.Vaidya@nrc.gov (Vaidya, Bhalchandra)
Tracking Status: None Bhalchandra.Vaidya@nrc.gov (Vaidya, Bhalchandra)
Tracking Status: None  
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
 
Files         Size     Date & Time MESSAGE         18518     04/30/2010 Options Expiration Date:
Post Office:  
Priority:               olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested:       False Return Notification:     False Sensitivity:     olNormal Recipients received:}}
 
Files               Size       Date & Time  
 
MESSAGE       18518       04/30/2010  
 
Options Expiration Date:
Priority:                       olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested:       False Return Notification:       False  
 
Sensitivity:         olNormal Recipients received:}}

Latest revision as of 19:05, 13 November 2019

Acceptance Review for FitzPatrick TAC No. ME3787
ML101200492
Person / Time
Site: FitzPatrick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/30/2010
From: Pickett D
NRC/NRR/DORL/LCPAB
To: Eugene Dorman
Entergy Corp
Pickett , NRR/DLPM, 415-1364
References
TAC ME3787
Download: ML101200492 (2)
v • d • e


Text

From: Pickett, Douglas Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 2:32 PM To: 'edorman@entergy.com' Cc: Lingam, Siva; Feintuch, Karl; Johnson, Don; Norris, Michael; Anderson, Joseph; Salgado, Nancy; Vaidya, Bhalchandra

Subject:

Acceptance Review for FitzPatrick TAC No. ME3787 Mr. Dorman:

By letter dated April 8, 2010 (TAC No. ME3787), Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. submitted a request to convert the Emergency Action Level scheme from NUMARC/NESP-007, Rev 2, to the standard set forth in NEI 99-01, Rev 5, for the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant.

The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff=s acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concludes that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposal in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

Please contact me if you have any questions. A copy of this email will be made publicly available in ADAMS.

Sincerely, Douglas V. Pickett, Senior Project Manager Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-1364 Email: douglas.pickett@nrc.gov E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()

Subject:

Acceptance Review for FitzPatrick TAC No. ME3787 Sent Date: 04/30/2010 2:20:36 PM Received Date: 04/30/2010 2:31:00 PM From: Pickett, Douglas Created By: Douglas.Pickett@nrc.gov

Recipients:

edorman@entergy.com ('edorman@entergy.com')

Tracking Status: None Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov (Lingam, Siva)

Tracking Status: None Karl.Feintuch@nrc.gov (Feintuch, Karl)

Tracking Status: None Don.Johnson@nrc.gov (Johnson, Don)

Tracking Status: None Michael.Norris@nrc.gov (Norris, Michael)

Tracking Status: None Joseph.Anderson@nrc.gov (Anderson, Joseph)

Tracking Status: None Nancy.Salgado@nrc.gov (Salgado, Nancy)

Tracking Status: None Bhalchandra.Vaidya@nrc.gov (Vaidya, Bhalchandra)

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 18518 04/30/2010 Options Expiration Date:

Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML101200492&oldid=2133857"