IR 05000443/2010404: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 06/17/2011
| issue date = 06/17/2011
| title = IR 05000443/2010404; 12/13/2010 - 05/16/2011; Seabrook Station, Unit 1; Identification and Resolution of Problems. (Letter Only)
| title = IR 05000443/2010404; 12/13/2010 - 05/16/2011; Seabrook Station, Unit 1; Identification and Resolution of Problems. (Letter Only)
| author name = Wilson P R
| author name = Wilson P
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRS
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRS
| addressee name = Freeman P
| addressee name = Freeman P
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:OFFIGIAT USE ONtY SECURITY_REIATED INFORMATIONJune 17,2011EA-11-049Mr. Paul FreemanSite Vice President, North RegionSeabrook Nuclear Power PlantNextEra Energy Seabrook, LLCc/o Mr. Michael O'KeefeP.O. Box 300Seabrook, NH 03874
{{#Wiki_filter:==SUBJECT:==
SEABROOK STATION, UNIT 1 - NRC SECURIry INSPECTION REPORT 05000443/2010404


SUBJECT: SEABROOK STATION, UNIT 1 - NRC SECURIry INSPECTION REPORT05000443/2010404
==Dear Mr. Freeman:==
On May 16,2011, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a focused Problem ldentification and Resolution inspection at your Seabrook Station Unit 1. The inspection covered one or more of the key attributes of the security cornerstone of the NRC's Reactor Oversight Process. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were disCussed on May 16, 2011, with you and other members of your staff.
 
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.
 
The inspector reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.
 
This report documents one self-revealing finding of very low security significance (i.e., Green as determined by the Baseline Security Significance Determination Process (BSSDP)). The deficiency was promptly corrected or compensated for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security requirements within the scope of the inspection before the inspector left the site. The inspector concluded that the finding did not have a cross-cutting aspect, because the primary contributing cause of the finding was not reflective of present performance.
 
Enclosure contains Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information. When separated from enclosure, the transmittal document is decontrolled.
 
OFFIClAT USE ONtY SEGURITY_REtATEB INFORMATION
 
OFFIEIAT USE ONtY - SECURIW-REIATEB INFERMATION P. Freeman  2 However, because of the very low security significance and because it is entered into your corrective action program, the NRC is treating this violation as a non-cited violation consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the NRC Enforcement Policy. lf you contest this non-cited violation, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Attn: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region l; the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC resident inspectors at Seabrook Station.


==Dear Mr. Freeman:==
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system, ADAMS. ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.qov/readinq-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). However, because of the security-related concerns contained in the enclosure, and in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, a copy of this letter's enclosure will not be available for public inspection.
On May 16,2011, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a focusedProblem ldentification and Resolution inspection at your Seabrook Station Unit 1. Theinspection covered one or more of the key attributes of the security cornerstone of the NRC'sReactor Oversight Process. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results,which were disCussed on May 16, 2011, with you and other members of your staff.The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security andcompliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.The inspector reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewedpersonnel.This report documents one self-revealing finding of very low security significance (i.e., Green asdetermined by the Baseline Security Significance Determination Process (BSSDP)). Thedeficiency was promptly corrected or compensated for, and the plant was in compliance withapplicable physical protection and security requirements within the scope of the inspectionbefore the inspector left the site. The inspector concluded that the finding did not have a cross-cutting aspect, because the primary contributing cause of the finding was not reflective ofpresent performance.Enclosure contains Sensitive UnclassifiedNon-Safeguards Information. Whenseparated from enclosure, the transmittaldocument is decontrolled.OFFIClAT USE ONtY SEGURITY_REtATEB INFORMATION OFFIEIAT USE ONtY - SECURIW-REIATEB INFERMATION However, because of the very low security significance and because it is entered into yourcorrective action program, the NRC is treating this violation as a non-cited violation consistentwith Section 2.3.2 of the NRC Enforcement Policy. lf you contest this non-cited violation, youshould provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis foryour denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Attn: Document Control Desk, Washington,DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region l; the Director, Office ofEnforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; andthe NRC resident inspectors at Seabrook Station.In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will beavailable electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from thePublicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system, ADAMS. ADAMSis accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.qov/readinq-rm/adams.html (the PublicElectronic Reading Room). However, because of the security-related concerns contained in theenclosure, and in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, a copy of this letter's enclosure will not beavailable for public inspection.In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(bX1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements foryour response, if any. This practice will ensure that your response will not be made availableelectronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC'sdocument system, ADAMS. lf Safeguards lnformation is necessary to provide an acceptableresponse, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.22. Othenruise, markyour entire response "security-Related Information - Withhold Under 10 CFR 2.390" and followthe instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(bX1).


Sincerely,/RNPeter R. Wilson, Deputy DirectorDivision of Reactor SafetyDocket No. 50-443License No. NPF-86
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(bX1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response, if any. This practice will ensure that your response will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's document system, ADAMS. lf Safeguards lnformation is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.22. Othenruise, mark your entire response "security-Related Information - Withhold Under 10 CFR 2.390" and follow the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(bX1).


===Enclosure:===
Sincerely,
NRC lnspection Report No. 05000443/2010404
/RN Peter R. Wilson, Deputy Director Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-443 License No. NPF-86 Enclosure:
NRC lnspection Report No. 05000443/2010404 w/Attachment: Supplemental I nformation (coNTAlNS SECURIW-RELATED INFORMATION (ouo-sRr))
OFFIElAT USE ONtY SEEURIW-REtATEB INFORMATIEN


===w/Attachment:===
OFFICIAT USE ONtY SEEURIW_REIATED INFORMATION
Supplemental I nformation(coNTAlNS SECURIW-RELATED INFORMATION(ouo-sRr))OFFIElAT USE ONtY SEEURIW-REtATEB INFORMATIEN
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 19:28, 12 November 2019

IR 05000443/2010404; 12/13/2010 - 05/16/2011; Seabrook Station, Unit 1; Identification and Resolution of Problems. (Letter Only)
ML111710091
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/17/2011
From: Wilson P
Division of Reactor Safety I
To: Freeman P
NextEra Energy Seabrook
References
EA-11-049 IR-10-404
Download: ML111710091 (5)
v • d • e


Text

SUBJECT:

SEABROOK STATION, UNIT 1 - NRC SECURIry INSPECTION REPORT 05000443/2010404

Dear Mr. Freeman:

On May 16,2011, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a focused Problem ldentification and Resolution inspection at your Seabrook Station Unit 1. The inspection covered one or more of the key attributes of the security cornerstone of the NRC's Reactor Oversight Process. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were disCussed on May 16, 2011, with you and other members of your staff.

The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.

The inspector reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.

This report documents one self-revealing finding of very low security significance (i.e., Green as determined by the Baseline Security Significance Determination Process (BSSDP)). The deficiency was promptly corrected or compensated for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security requirements within the scope of the inspection before the inspector left the site. The inspector concluded that the finding did not have a cross-cutting aspect, because the primary contributing cause of the finding was not reflective of present performance.

Enclosure contains Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information. When separated from enclosure, the transmittal document is decontrolled.

OFFIClAT USE ONtY SEGURITY_REtATEB INFORMATION

OFFIEIAT USE ONtY - SECURIW-REIATEB INFERMATION P. Freeman 2 However, because of the very low security significance and because it is entered into your corrective action program, the NRC is treating this violation as a non-cited violation consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the NRC Enforcement Policy. lf you contest this non-cited violation, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Attn: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region l; the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC resident inspectors at Seabrook Station.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system, ADAMS. ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.qov/readinq-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). However, because of the security-related concerns contained in the enclosure, and in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, a copy of this letter's enclosure will not be available for public inspection.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(bX1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response, if any. This practice will ensure that your response will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's document system, ADAMS. lf Safeguards lnformation is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.22. Othenruise, mark your entire response "security-Related Information - Withhold Under 10 CFR 2.390" and follow the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(bX1).

Sincerely,

/RN Peter R. Wilson, Deputy Director Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-443 License No. NPF-86 Enclosure:

NRC lnspection Report No. 05000443/2010404 w/Attachment: Supplemental I nformation (coNTAlNS SECURIW-RELATED INFORMATION (ouo-sRr))

OFFIElAT USE ONtY SEEURIW-REtATEB INFORMATIEN

OFFICIAT USE ONtY SEEURIW_REIATED INFORMATION

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=IR_05000443/2010404&oldid=2116379"