ML13044A088: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 02/09/2013
| issue date = 02/09/2013
| title = LTR-13-0126 Doris Schiller Concerns Safety Issue at San Onofre
| title = LTR-13-0126 Doris Schiller Concerns Safety Issue at San Onofre
| author name = Schiller D H
| author name = Schiller D
| author affiliation = - No Known Affiliation
| author affiliation = - No Known Affiliation
| addressee name = Macfarlane A M
| addressee name = Macfarlane A
| addressee affiliation = NRC/Chairman
| addressee affiliation = NRC/Chairman
| docket = 05000206, 05000361, 05000362
| docket = 05000206, 05000361, 05000362
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET Date Printed: Feb 11, 2013 14:0 7 PAPER NUMBER: ACTION OFFICE: AUTHOR: AFFILIATION:
{{#Wiki_filter:OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET Date Printed: Feb 11, 2013 14:0 7 PAPER NUMBER:                                                   LOGGING DATE:        02/11/2013 ACTION OFFICE:
ADDRESSEE:
7-oiJ AUTHOR:           Doris Schiller AFFILIATION:
ADDRESSEE:       Chairman Resource


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
ACTION: DISTRIBUTION:
Concerns safety issue at San Onofre ACTION:          Appropriate DISTRIBUTION:    RF, SECY to Ack.
LETTER DATE: ACKNOWLEDGED SPECIAL HANDLING: LOGGING DATE: 02/11/2013 7-oiJ Doris Schiller Chairman Resource Concerns safety issue at San Onofre Appropriate RF, SECY to Ack.02/09/2013 Yes Lead office to publicly release 24 hours after SECY's assignment, via SECY/EDO/DPC.
LETTER DATE:      02/09/2013 ACKNOWLEDGED      Yes SPECIAL HANDLING: Lead office to publicly release 24 hours after SECY's assignment, via SECY/EDO/DPC.
NOTES: FILE LOCATION: ADAMS DATE DUE: DATE SIGNED: G Joosten, Sandy From: Doris Schiller [dorisschiller55@gmail.com]
NOTES:
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 12:05 PM To: CHAIRMAN Resource  
FILE LOCATION:   ADAMS DATE DUE:                                           DATE SIGNED:
G
 
Joosten, Sandy From:                       Doris Schiller [dorisschiller55@gmail.com]
Sent:                       Saturday, February 09, 2013 12:05 PM To:                         CHAIRMAN Resource


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
San Onofre I just read that apparently Edison knew about the vibration safety issue at San Onofre, and did not address it due to the requirement for re-licensing.
San Onofre I just read that apparently Edison knew about the vibration safety issue at San Onofre, and did not address it due to the requirement for re-licensing. I can't believe "industry standards" support this type of action. This appears to be a reckless disregard for public safety in order to save money. What other actions were taken to cut costs on this project? A full investigation of Edison needs to be done. This company should not be running a nuclear power plant if it is hiding info from the NRC. Also, if the NRC was knowledgeable about this safety concern, the people involved need to be investigated as well.
I can't believe "industry standards" support this type of action. This appears to be a reckless disregard for public safety in order to save money. What other actions were taken to cut costs on this project? A full investigation of Edison needs to be done. This company should not be running a nuclear power plant if it is hiding info from the NRC. Also, if the NRC was knowledgeable about this safety concern, the people involved need to be investigated as well.I}}
I}}

Latest revision as of 23:11, 4 November 2019

LTR-13-0126 Doris Schiller Concerns Safety Issue at San Onofre
ML13044A088
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 02/09/2013
From: Schiller D
- No Known Affiliation
To: Macfarlane A
NRC/Chairman
References
LTR-13-0126
Download: ML13044A088 (2)


Text

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET Date Printed: Feb 11, 2013 14:0 7 PAPER NUMBER: LOGGING DATE: 02/11/2013 ACTION OFFICE:

7-oiJ AUTHOR: Doris Schiller AFFILIATION:

ADDRESSEE: Chairman Resource

SUBJECT:

Concerns safety issue at San Onofre ACTION: Appropriate DISTRIBUTION: RF, SECY to Ack.

LETTER DATE: 02/09/2013 ACKNOWLEDGED Yes SPECIAL HANDLING: Lead office to publicly release 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> after SECY's assignment, via SECY/EDO/DPC.

NOTES:

FILE LOCATION: ADAMS DATE DUE: DATE SIGNED:

G

Joosten, Sandy From: Doris Schiller [dorisschiller55@gmail.com]

Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 12:05 PM To: CHAIRMAN Resource

Subject:

San Onofre I just read that apparently Edison knew about the vibration safety issue at San Onofre, and did not address it due to the requirement for re-licensing. I can't believe "industry standards" support this type of action. This appears to be a reckless disregard for public safety in order to save money. What other actions were taken to cut costs on this project? A full investigation of Edison needs to be done. This company should not be running a nuclear power plant if it is hiding info from the NRC. Also, if the NRC was knowledgeable about this safety concern, the people involved need to be investigated as well.

I