ML13044A088
| ML13044A088 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 02/09/2013 |
| From: | Schiller D - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Macfarlane A NRC/Chairman |
| References | |
| LTR-13-0126 | |
| Download: ML13044A088 (2) | |
Text
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET Date Printed: Feb 11, 2013 14:0 7 PAPER NUMBER:
ACTION OFFICE:
AUTHOR:
AFFILIATION:
ADDRESSEE:
SUBJECT:
ACTION:
DISTRIBUTION:
LETTER DATE:
ACKNOWLEDGED SPECIAL HANDLING:
LOGGING DATE:
02/11/2013 7-oiJ Doris Schiller Chairman Resource Concerns safety issue at San Onofre Appropriate RF, SECY to Ack.
02/09/2013 Yes Lead office to publicly release 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> after SECY's assignment, via SECY/EDO/DPC.
NOTES:
FILE LOCATION:
ADAMS DATE DUE:
DATE SIGNED:
G
Joosten, Sandy From:
Doris Schiller [dorisschiller55@gmail.com]
Sent:
Saturday, February 09, 2013 12:05 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
San Onofre I just read that apparently Edison knew about the vibration safety issue at San Onofre, and did not address it due to the requirement for re-licensing. I can't believe "industry standards" support this type of action. This appears to be a reckless disregard for public safety in order to save money. What other actions were taken to cut costs on this project? A full investigation of Edison needs to be done. This company should not be running a nuclear power plant if it is hiding info from the NRC. Also, if the NRC was knowledgeable about this safety concern, the people involved need to be investigated as well.
I