|
|
| Line 16: |
Line 16: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET Date Printed: Feb 11, 2013 14:0 7 PAPER NUMBER: ACTION OFFICE: AUTHOR: AFFILIATION: | | {{#Wiki_filter:OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET Date Printed: Feb 11, 2013 14:0 7 PAPER NUMBER: LOGGING DATE: 02/11/2013 ACTION OFFICE: |
| ADDRESSEE: | | 7-oiJ AUTHOR: Doris Schiller AFFILIATION: |
| | ADDRESSEE: Chairman Resource |
|
| |
|
| ==SUBJECT:== | | ==SUBJECT:== |
| ACTION: DISTRIBUTION:
| | Concerns safety issue at San Onofre ACTION: Appropriate DISTRIBUTION: RF, SECY to Ack. |
| LETTER DATE: ACKNOWLEDGED SPECIAL HANDLING: LOGGING DATE: 02/11/2013 7-oiJ Doris Schiller Chairman Resource Concerns safety issue at San Onofre Appropriate RF, SECY to Ack.02/09/2013 Yes Lead office to publicly release 24 hours after SECY's assignment, via SECY/EDO/DPC.
| | LETTER DATE: 02/09/2013 ACKNOWLEDGED Yes SPECIAL HANDLING: Lead office to publicly release 24 hours after SECY's assignment, via SECY/EDO/DPC. |
| NOTES: FILE LOCATION: ADAMS DATE DUE: DATE SIGNED: G Joosten, Sandy From: Doris Schiller [dorisschiller55@gmail.com] | | NOTES: |
| Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 12:05 PM To: CHAIRMAN Resource | | FILE LOCATION: ADAMS DATE DUE: DATE SIGNED: |
| | G |
| | |
| | Joosten, Sandy From: Doris Schiller [dorisschiller55@gmail.com] |
| | Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 12:05 PM To: CHAIRMAN Resource |
|
| |
|
| ==Subject:== | | ==Subject:== |
| San Onofre I just read that apparently Edison knew about the vibration safety issue at San Onofre, and did not address it due to the requirement for re-licensing. | | San Onofre I just read that apparently Edison knew about the vibration safety issue at San Onofre, and did not address it due to the requirement for re-licensing. I can't believe "industry standards" support this type of action. This appears to be a reckless disregard for public safety in order to save money. What other actions were taken to cut costs on this project? A full investigation of Edison needs to be done. This company should not be running a nuclear power plant if it is hiding info from the NRC. Also, if the NRC was knowledgeable about this safety concern, the people involved need to be investigated as well. |
| I can't believe "industry standards" support this type of action. This appears to be a reckless disregard for public safety in order to save money. What other actions were taken to cut costs on this project? A full investigation of Edison needs to be done. This company should not be running a nuclear power plant if it is hiding info from the NRC. Also, if the NRC was knowledgeable about this safety concern, the people involved need to be investigated as well.I}} | | I}} |
Latest revision as of 23:11, 4 November 2019
|
|---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML22348A0322022-11-30030 November 2022
NRR E-mail Capture - Request to Resume Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation for Decommissioning of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3
ML22348A0532022-11-30030 November 2022
NRC to National Marine Fisheries Service (Nmfs), Request to Resume Endangered Species Act Consultation for Decommissioning of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3
ML22278A0182022-10-0404 October 2022
(SONGS) Unit 2 Reactor Head and Closure of Commitments Related to Peaceful Use of Foreign Technology- Acknowledge Receipt
ML22265A2122022-09-22022 September 2022
Request for Additional Information for Exemption Request from 100m 72.106(B) Requirement, Docket Nos 50-206, 50-361, and 50-362
ML22119A2422022-04-29029 April 2022
Riv FOLLOW-UP Response: Question About April 11 San Onofre Event
ML22034A9962022-02-0202 February 2022
S. Morris Response to C. Langley-Questions About Moving Snf at San Onfre
ML21280A1022021-12-0606 December 2021
NRC to NMFS, Supplement to Request to Reinitiate Endangered Species Act Consultation for San Onofre Decommissioning
ML21277A2342021-09-30030 September 2021
NMFS to NRC, Receipt of Request to Reinitiate Endangered Species Act Consultation for San Onofre Decommissioning
ML21242A0602021-09-30030 September 2021
NRC to NMFS, Request to Initiate Consultation for SONGS Decommissioning
ML21117A3492021-03-30030 March 2021
March 30, 2021, Email from Public Watchdogs on Providing New Information to Its October 13, 2020, 2.206 Petition
ML21069A2482021-03-10010 March 2021
Umax, 07200054, 05000361, 05000362, FSAR Revision 4 for San Onofre ISFSI
ML21068A2712021-03-0909 March 2021
Request for Additional Information Regarding Biological Opinion - SONGS- EPID L-2021-LLL-0006
ML20343A1292020-12-0808 December 2020
NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information
ML20302A3252020-10-21021 October 2020
E-Mail: Acknowledgement of Receipt to the Petitioner Regarding SCE Use of Hi-Storm at SONGS
ML20233A7342020-08-18018 August 2020
LTR-20-0313 David Victor, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Community Engagement Panel, Chair, Et Al., Letter Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Security at SONGS and Recent SONGS Community Engagement Panel Meeting on O
ML20224A0172020-08-0707 August 2020
8-7-20 Corrected Hearing Time - Intervenor SCEs Acknowledgement of Oral Argument Notice (9th Cir.)(Case No. 20-70899)
ML20224A0182020-08-0707 August 2020
8-7-20 Intervenor SCEs Acknowledgement of Oral Argument Notice (9th Cir.)(Case No. 20-70899)
ML20204B0782020-07-22022 July 2020
Donna Gilmore Email Holtec Umax Materials (07200054, 05000361, 05000362)
ML20198M4522020-07-15015 July 2020
Supplement to Public Watchdogs 2.206 Petition
ML20163A3402020-05-0505 May 2020
Email Transmission - Peaceful Use Commitments State Dept for SONGS Rx Heads and Steam Generators
ML20120A0282020-04-28028 April 2020
4-28-20 Notice of Addition of James Adler as Attorney for NRC (9th Cir.)(Case No. 20-70899)
ML20076A5742020-03-11011 March 2020
Response to A.Mcnally San Onofre Canisters (LTR-20-0003)
ML20062F5762020-02-28028 February 2020
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - NRC E-mail to Petitioner Regarding Petition Screening Results February 28, 2020
ML20063M3092020-02-28028 February 2020
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - Response from Petitioner to NRC E-mail Regarding Petition Screening Results, February 28, 2020
ML20059M2292020-02-25025 February 2020
OEDO-20-00053 2.206 Petition - Flooding Likely to Create Radioactive Geysers at SONGS
ML20049A0802020-02-14014 February 2020
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - E-mail to Petitioner on Immediate Actions Request Determination February 14, 2020
ML20007E5342020-01-0606 January 2020
Oceansiders Initial Assessment & Public Meeting Response E-Mail
ML20006D7012019-12-23023 December 2019
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition SONGS - Petitioner Request for Public Meeting and NRC Response - December 23, 2019
ML19354B6762019-12-20020 December 2019
2.206 Petition Initial Assessment Notification E-Mail
ML19325C5902019-11-20020 November 2019
2.206 Petition Status Notification Email
ML19326B2392019-11-18018 November 2019
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition SONGS - Screened-in and PRB November 18, 2019
ML19319B6262019-11-0808 November 2019
Oceansiders 2.206 Petition Immediate Action Response E-Mail
ML19326A7122019-10-30030 October 2019
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - SONGS Receipt of Exhibits October 30, 2019
ML19326A9692019-10-25025 October 2019
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - SONGS Immediate Action Determination October 25, 2019
ML19326A3602019-10-23023 October 2019
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - SONGS First E-mail to Petitioner October 23, 2019
ML19284B3232019-10-0808 October 2019
Response LTR-19-0351 Kalene Walker, E-mail Concerns About Critical Safety Problems with Holtec Nuclear Waste Storage System at San Onofre
ML19344C7842019-09-0303 September 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 09-03-2019 RSCS
ML19344C7212019-08-30030 August 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 08-30-2019 J Steinmetz
ML19217A1862019-08-0202 August 2019
E-Mail from M. Layton/Nrc to K. Walker/Public San Onofre - SONGS Special Inspection - Damaged Canisters
ML19214A1362019-08-0202 August 2019
Riv Pao Response to Mr. Langley Response to Inquiry
ML19221B4122019-07-30030 July 2019
Southern California Edison Company, Southern California Nuclear Generating Station, E-mail from Charles Langley to Scott Morris, NRC, Redundant Drop Protection Features at SONGS
ML19213A1072019-07-29029 July 2019
Reply to Mr. Langley Re. Redundant Drop Protection Feature at SONGS
ML19210D4292019-07-29029 July 2019
E-Mail from M. Layton/Nrc to D. Gilmore/Public Reply to E-Mail Questions
ML19210D4342019-07-11011 July 2019
Curtiss-Wright SAS - 10 CFR Part 21 Reporting of Defects for Introl Positioner 890265-010
ML19190A0432019-06-28028 June 2019
Discusses Proprietary Information for Curtiss-Wright SAS - 10 CFR Part 21 Reporting of Defects for Introl Positioner 890265-010 - Cw SAS Initial Report No. 10CFR21-48
ML19165A1102019-06-11011 June 2019
SONGS Webinar (6-3-2019) Message - Sarah Akerson
ML19190A0442019-06-0707 June 2019
10 CFR Part 21 Reporting of Defects for Introl Positioner 890265-010 - Cw SAS Initial Report No. 10CFR21-48
ML19158A4432019-06-0404 June 2019
Southern California Edison Company; Scratches on Nuclear Storage Canisters at San Onofre Pose No Problems, NRC Says After Its Own Analysis - Orange County Register
ML19156A1422019-06-0404 June 2019
LTR-19-0218 Donna Gilmore, Sanonofresafety.Org, E-mail Scratches on Nuclear Storage Canisters at San Onofre
ML19158A1312019-05-31031 May 2019
Paragon Energy Systems LLC -10 CFR Part 21 Report of Defect GS2 Terry Turbine Introl Positioners
2022-09-22
[Table view] |
Text
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET Date Printed: Feb 11, 2013 14:0 7 PAPER NUMBER: LOGGING DATE: 02/11/2013 ACTION OFFICE:
7-oiJ AUTHOR: Doris Schiller AFFILIATION:
ADDRESSEE: Chairman Resource
SUBJECT:
Concerns safety issue at San Onofre ACTION: Appropriate DISTRIBUTION: RF, SECY to Ack.
LETTER DATE: 02/09/2013 ACKNOWLEDGED Yes SPECIAL HANDLING: Lead office to publicly release 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> after SECY's assignment, via SECY/EDO/DPC.
NOTES:
FILE LOCATION: ADAMS DATE DUE: DATE SIGNED:
G
Joosten, Sandy From: Doris Schiller [dorisschiller55@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 12:05 PM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
San Onofre I just read that apparently Edison knew about the vibration safety issue at San Onofre, and did not address it due to the requirement for re-licensing. I can't believe "industry standards" support this type of action. This appears to be a reckless disregard for public safety in order to save money. What other actions were taken to cut costs on this project? A full investigation of Edison needs to be done. This company should not be running a nuclear power plant if it is hiding info from the NRC. Also, if the NRC was knowledgeable about this safety concern, the people involved need to be investigated as well.
I
