ML13204A145: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML13204A145 | | number = ML13204A145 | ||
| issue date = 08/06/2013 | | issue date = 08/06/2013 | ||
| title = | | title = Request for Additional Information Concerning Integrated Leak Rate Testing | ||
| author name = Martin R | | author name = Martin R | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1 | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1 | ||
| addressee name = Gatlin T | | addressee name = Gatlin T | ||
| addressee affiliation = South Carolina Electric & Gas Co | | addressee affiliation = South Carolina Electric & Gas Co | ||
| docket = 05000395 | | docket = 05000395 | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| page count = 4 | | page count = 4 | ||
| project = TAC:MF1385 | | project = TAC:MF1385 | ||
| stage = RAI | |||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED NUCLEAR REGULATORY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 August 6, 2013 Mr. Thomas D. Gatlin Vice President, Nuclear Operations South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Post Office Box 88, Mail Code 800 Jenkinsville, SC 29065 VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT NO.1 -REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TESTING (TAC NO. MF1385) Dear Mr. Gatlin: By letter dated April 3, 2013 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System ADAMS) Accession No. | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 August 6, 2013 Mr. Thomas D. Gatlin Vice President, Nuclear Operations South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Post Office Box 88, Mail Code 800 Jenkinsville, SC 29065 | ||
August 6, 2013 Mr. Thomas D. Gatlin Vice President, Nuclear Operations South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Post Office Box 88, Mail Code 800 Jenkinsville, SC 29065 VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT NO.1 -REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TESTING (TAC NO. MF1385) Dear Mr. Gatlin: By letter dated April 3, 2013 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System ADAMS) Accession No. ML130950121), South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, requested changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) for the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (VCSNS). The proposed change would allow for the extension of the 130-month frequency of the VCSNS containment leakage rate test (e.g., Integrated Leak Rate Test [ILRT] or Type A test) that is required by TS 6.8.4(g) to 15 years on a permanent basis. With the approval of the proposed change, the existing ILRT frequency would be revised from 10.9 years to 15 years. In accordance with the guidance in NEI 94-01, Revision 3-A, the proposed change would permit the existing primary containment ILRT frequency to be extended from 10 years to no longer than 15 years on a permanent basis. A response to the enclosed Request for Additional Information is needed before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff can complete the review. Please provide a response within 30 days of the issuance of this letter. Sincerely IRA! Robert E. Martin, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. Request for Additional cc w/encl: Distribution via PUBLIC LPL2-1 R/F RidsAcrsAcnwMailCenter RidsNrrDssScvb RidsRgn2MailCenter | |||
}} | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT NO.1 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TESTING (TAC NO. MF1385) | |||
==Dear Mr. Gatlin:== | |||
By letter dated April 3, 2013 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System ADAMS) Accession No. ML130950121), South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, requested changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) for the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (VCSNS). The proposed change would allow for the extension of the 130-month frequency of the VCSNS containment leakage rate test (e.g., Integrated Leak Rate Test [ILRT] or Type A test) that is required by TS 6.8.4(g) to 15 years on a permanent basis. With the approval of the proposed change, the existing ILRT frequency would be revised from 10.9 years to 15 years. In accordance with the guidance in NEI 94-01, Revision 3-A, the proposed change would permit the existing primary containment ILRT frequency to be extended from 10 years to no longer than 15 years on a permanent basis. | |||
A response to the enclosed Request for Additional Information is needed before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff can complete the review. Please provide a response within 30 days of the issuance of this letter. | |||
Sincerely | |||
~df.i.:I7e~ | |||
Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Manager Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-395 | |||
==Enclosure:== | |||
Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv | |||
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION EXTENSION OF INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TESTING FREQUENCY SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 DOCKET NO. 50-395 Containment | |||
: 1. Subsection IWE-1240, to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Section XI, requires that surface areas likely to experience accelerated degradation and aging require augmented examinations. Describe any identified areas that require performance of augmented inspections in accordance with IWE-1240. | |||
Mechanical Engineering | |||
: 1. In order to assess the implementation of the Type B and Type C local leak rate testing program, the licensee is requested to provide the following: | |||
(a) In the Reference, Attachment V table titled, "VCSNS Failed LLRTs 2003 - 2012" there are twelve "As Left" Test Types with higher leakage rates than the acceptance criteria. Explain why the "As Left" leakage rates were acceptable. | |||
(b) Attachment V, from the Reference, contains a summary table of local leak rate tests (LLRTs) that did not meet the required acceptance criteria. Describe the causes and corrective actions taken to address the LLRTs that did not demonstrate acceptable performance in accordance with the Containment Leakage Rate Program. | |||
(c) List the length of the test interval for each failed LLRT in the Attachment V table of the Reference. Describe the basis for the length of each failed test interval, as required for the containment leakage rate testill9 program per the current 10 CFR 50, Appendix J Testing Program Plan using Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.163 (September 1995). In addition, discuss how these intervals will change when NEI 94-01, Revision 3-A, "Industry Guideline for Implementing Performance Based Option of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J" is used. | |||
: 2. Consistent with NRC Information Notice 2004-09, "Corrosion of Steel Containment and Containment Liner," discuss any operating experience and evaluation results, regarding the potential for, or presence of, corrosive conditions at the junction of the metal liner and interior concrete floor of the containment, including the potential for stagnant water to have collected behind a degraded floor seal area that could promote pitting corrosion. | |||
Enclosure | |||
-2 Risk Assessment | |||
: 1. According to Regulatory Issue Summary 2007-06, "Regulatory Guide 1.200 Implementation," the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff expects licensees to fully address all scope elements with Revision 2 of Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.200 by the end of its implementation period (Le., one year after the issuance of Revision 2 of RG 1.200). Revision 2 of RG 1.200 endorses, with exceptions and clarifications, the combined American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)/American Nuclear Society (ANS) probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) standard (ASME/ANS RA-Sa-2009). | |||
Given that the implementation date of RG 1.200, Revision 2, was April 2010 and the date of the license amendment request (LAR) submittal, April 2013, describe any gaps between the 2007 focused scope peer review of the PRA model used in this application and RG 1.200, Revision 2, that are relevant to this submittal and the impact on this application. | |||
: 2. Revision 2 of RG 1.200 endorses, with exceptions and clarifications, ASME/ANS RA-Sa 2009. The ASME/ANS PRA standard provides that PRA upgrades be followed by a focused scope peer review. | |||
Discuss whether the inclusion of the recently developed simplified Level 2 PRA for the internal events model that was referenced in Section 4.5.2 of Attachment I to the LAR is a PRA maintenance or PRA upgrade as defined in the ASME/ANS PRA standard. If the inclusion of the simplified Level 2 PRA for the internal events model is a PRA upgrade, describe the focused scope peer review that was conducted and provide the resolution of the Facts and Observations (F&Os). Otherwise, explain why the inclusion of the simplified Level 2 PRA model is not considered an "incorporation into a PRA model of a new methodology." | |||
: 3. Revision 2 of RG 1.200 endorses, with exceptions and clarifications, ASME/ANS RA-Sa 2009. In Regulatory Position 4.2 of RG 1.200, Revision 2, the NRC staff stated that it expects licensees to submit a discussion of the resolution of the peer review findings that are applicable to the parts of the PRA required for the application. | |||
Provide a list of the F&Os from the focused scope peer review relevant to this submittal and explain how the F&Os were addressed for this application. | |||
August 6, 2013 Mr. Thomas D. Gatlin Vice President, Nuclear Operations South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Post Office Box 88, Mail Code 800 Jenkinsville, SC 29065 | |||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT NO.1 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TESTING (TAC NO. MF1385) | |||
==Dear Mr. Gatlin:== | |||
By letter dated April 3, 2013 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System ADAMS) Accession No. ML130950121), South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, requested changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) for the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (VCSNS). The proposed change would allow for the extension of the 130-month frequency of the VCSNS containment leakage rate test (e.g., Integrated Leak Rate Test [ILRT] or Type A test) that is required by TS 6.8.4(g) to 15 years on a permanent basis. With the approval of the proposed change, the existing ILRT frequency would be revised from 10.9 years to 15 years. In accordance with the guidance in NEI 94-01, Revision 3-A, the proposed change would permit the existing primary containment ILRT frequency to be extended from 10 years to no longer than 15 years on a permanent basis. | |||
A response to the enclosed Request for Additional Information is needed before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff can complete the review. Please provide a response within 30 days of the issuance of this letter. | |||
Sincerely IRA! | |||
Robert E. Martin, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-395 | |||
==Enclosure:== | |||
Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION: | |||
PUBLIC LPL2-1 R/F RidsAcrsAcnwMailCenter RidsNrrDeEmcb RidsNrrDssScvb RidsNrrPMSummer RTorres RidsRgn2MailCenter SDeJesus DHoang | |||
*via email or memo LPL2-lIBC 8/06/13 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}} | |||
Latest revision as of 15:43, 4 November 2019
| ML13204A145 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Summer  |
| Issue date: | 08/06/2013 |
| From: | Martin R Plant Licensing Branch II |
| To: | Gatlin T South Carolina Electric & Gas Co |
| Martin Robert, 415-1493 | |
| References | |
| TAC MF1385 | |
| Download: ML13204A145 (4) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 August 6, 2013 Mr. Thomas D. Gatlin Vice President, Nuclear Operations South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Post Office Box 88, Mail Code 800 Jenkinsville, SC 29065
SUBJECT:
VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT NO.1 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TESTING (TAC NO. MF1385)
Dear Mr. Gatlin:
By letter dated April 3, 2013 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System ADAMS) Accession No. ML130950121), South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, requested changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) for the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (VCSNS). The proposed change would allow for the extension of the 130-month frequency of the VCSNS containment leakage rate test (e.g., Integrated Leak Rate Test [ILRT] or Type A test) that is required by TS 6.8.4(g) to 15 years on a permanent basis. With the approval of the proposed change, the existing ILRT frequency would be revised from 10.9 years to 15 years. In accordance with the guidance in NEI 94-01, Revision 3-A, the proposed change would permit the existing primary containment ILRT frequency to be extended from 10 years to no longer than 15 years on a permanent basis.
A response to the enclosed Request for Additional Information is needed before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff can complete the review. Please provide a response within 30 days of the issuance of this letter.
Sincerely
~df.i.:I7e~
Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Manager Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-395
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION EXTENSION OF INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TESTING FREQUENCY SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 DOCKET NO. 50-395 Containment
- 1. Subsection IWE-1240, to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Section XI, requires that surface areas likely to experience accelerated degradation and aging require augmented examinations. Describe any identified areas that require performance of augmented inspections in accordance with IWE-1240.
Mechanical Engineering
- 1. In order to assess the implementation of the Type B and Type C local leak rate testing program, the licensee is requested to provide the following:
(a) In the Reference, Attachment V table titled, "VCSNS Failed LLRTs 2003 - 2012" there are twelve "As Left" Test Types with higher leakage rates than the acceptance criteria. Explain why the "As Left" leakage rates were acceptable.
(b) Attachment V, from the Reference, contains a summary table of local leak rate tests (LLRTs) that did not meet the required acceptance criteria. Describe the causes and corrective actions taken to address the LLRTs that did not demonstrate acceptable performance in accordance with the Containment Leakage Rate Program.
(c) List the length of the test interval for each failed LLRT in the Attachment V table of the Reference. Describe the basis for the length of each failed test interval, as required for the containment leakage rate testill9 program per the current 10 CFR 50, Appendix J Testing Program Plan using Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.163 (September 1995). In addition, discuss how these intervals will change when NEI 94-01, Revision 3-A, "Industry Guideline for Implementing Performance Based Option of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J" is used.
- 2. Consistent with NRC Information Notice 2004-09, "Corrosion of Steel Containment and Containment Liner," discuss any operating experience and evaluation results, regarding the potential for, or presence of, corrosive conditions at the junction of the metal liner and interior concrete floor of the containment, including the potential for stagnant water to have collected behind a degraded floor seal area that could promote pitting corrosion.
Enclosure
-2 Risk Assessment
- 1. According to Regulatory Issue Summary 2007-06, "Regulatory Guide 1.200 Implementation," the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff expects licensees to fully address all scope elements with Revision 2 of Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.200 by the end of its implementation period (Le., one year after the issuance of Revision 2 of RG 1.200). Revision 2 of RG 1.200 endorses, with exceptions and clarifications, the combined American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)/American Nuclear Society (ANS) probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) standard (ASME/ANS RA-Sa-2009).
Given that the implementation date of RG 1.200, Revision 2, was April 2010 and the date of the license amendment request (LAR) submittal, April 2013, describe any gaps between the 2007 focused scope peer review of the PRA model used in this application and RG 1.200, Revision 2, that are relevant to this submittal and the impact on this application.
- 2. Revision 2 of RG 1.200 endorses, with exceptions and clarifications, ASME/ANS RA-Sa 2009. The ASME/ANS PRA standard provides that PRA upgrades be followed by a focused scope peer review.
Discuss whether the inclusion of the recently developed simplified Level 2 PRA for the internal events model that was referenced in Section 4.5.2 of Attachment I to the LAR is a PRA maintenance or PRA upgrade as defined in the ASME/ANS PRA standard. If the inclusion of the simplified Level 2 PRA for the internal events model is a PRA upgrade, describe the focused scope peer review that was conducted and provide the resolution of the Facts and Observations (F&Os). Otherwise, explain why the inclusion of the simplified Level 2 PRA model is not considered an "incorporation into a PRA model of a new methodology."
- 3. Revision 2 of RG 1.200 endorses, with exceptions and clarifications, ASME/ANS RA-Sa 2009. In Regulatory Position 4.2 of RG 1.200, Revision 2, the NRC staff stated that it expects licensees to submit a discussion of the resolution of the peer review findings that are applicable to the parts of the PRA required for the application.
Provide a list of the F&Os from the focused scope peer review relevant to this submittal and explain how the F&Os were addressed for this application.
August 6, 2013 Mr. Thomas D. Gatlin Vice President, Nuclear Operations South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Post Office Box 88, Mail Code 800 Jenkinsville, SC 29065
SUBJECT:
VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT NO.1 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TESTING (TAC NO. MF1385)
Dear Mr. Gatlin:
By letter dated April 3, 2013 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System ADAMS) Accession No. ML130950121), South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, requested changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) for the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (VCSNS). The proposed change would allow for the extension of the 130-month frequency of the VCSNS containment leakage rate test (e.g., Integrated Leak Rate Test [ILRT] or Type A test) that is required by TS 6.8.4(g) to 15 years on a permanent basis. With the approval of the proposed change, the existing ILRT frequency would be revised from 10.9 years to 15 years. In accordance with the guidance in NEI 94-01, Revision 3-A, the proposed change would permit the existing primary containment ILRT frequency to be extended from 10 years to no longer than 15 years on a permanent basis.
A response to the enclosed Request for Additional Information is needed before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff can complete the review. Please provide a response within 30 days of the issuance of this letter.
Sincerely IRA!
Robert E. Martin, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-395
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:
PUBLIC LPL2-1 R/F RidsAcrsAcnwMailCenter RidsNrrDeEmcb RidsNrrDssScvb RidsNrrPMSummer RTorres RidsRgn2MailCenter SDeJesus DHoang
- via email or memo LPL2-lIBC 8/06/13 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY