ML15275A357: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML15275A357
| number = ML15275A357
| issue date = 10/08/2015
| issue date = 10/08/2015
| title = Shearon Harris, Unit 1-Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action for Technical Specification Change Regarding Risk-Informed Justification for the Relocation of Specific Surveillance Frequency Requirements to a Licensee Controlled Program
| title = Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action for Technical Specification Change Regarding Risk-Informed Justification for the Relocation of Specific Surveillance Frequency Requirements to a Licensee Controlled Program
| author name = Barillas M C
| author name = Barillas M
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-2
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-2
| addressee name = Waldrep B C
| addressee name = Waldrep B
| addressee affiliation = Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc
| addressee affiliation = Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc
| docket = 05000400
| docket = 05000400
| license number = NPF-063
| license number = NPF-063
| contact person = Barillas M C, NRR/DORL, 415-2760
| contact person = Barillas M, NRR/DORL, 415-2760
| case reference number = TAC MF6583
| case reference number = TAC MF6583
| document type = Letter
| document type = Letter
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 Mr. Benjamin C. Waldrep Site Vice President Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant 5413 Shearon Harris Rd. M/C HNP01 New Hill, NC 27562-0165 October 8, 2015
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 October 8, 2015 Mr. Benjamin C. Waldrep Site Vice President Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant 5413 Shearon Harris Rd.
M/C HNP01 New Hill, NC 27562-0165


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1 -ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION FOR TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REGARDING RISK-INFORMED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE RELOCATION OF SPECIFIC SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY REQUIREMENTS TO A LICENSEE CONTROLLED PROGRAM (TAC NO. MF6583)  
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1 -ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION FOR TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REGARDING RISK-INFORMED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE RELOCATION OF SPECIFIC SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY REQUIREMENTS TO A LICENSEE CONTROLLED PROGRAM (TAC NO. MF6583)


==Dear Mr. Waldrep:==
==Dear Mr. Waldrep:==
By letter dated August 18, 2015 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML 15236A265), Duke Energy Progress, Inc. (Duke Energy) requested an amendment to the Technical Specifications (TSs) of Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-63 for Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1. The proposed amendment would revise the TSs by relocating specific surveillance frequencies to a licensee-controlled program with the adoption of Technical Specification Task Force Traveler-425, Revision 3, "Relocate Surveillance Frequencies to Licensee Control -RITSTF [Risk-Informed Technical Specification Task Force] Initiative Sb." Additionally, the change would add a new program, the Surveillance Frequency Control Program, to TS Section 6, "Administrative Controls." On September 16, 2015, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff held a conference call with members of your staff to discuss insufficiencies identified during the acceptance review of the amendment request. Specifically, the amendment did not adequately provide the facts and observations (F&Os) from the peer reviews and gap assessments of the internal events probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) which are open, not met, or met at capability category I, nor explain how the F&Os were dispositioned for this application. The NRC staff requested that Duke Energy provide an overview of the changes in the internal events PRA that occurred after the 2007 peer review and clarify whether any of these changes qualify as a PRA upgrade that would require a focused scope peer review. By letter dated September 18, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 15259A435), you were informed of the above insufficiencies and informed that the license amendment request would need to be supplemented by September 30, 2015. By letter dated September 29, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 15272A443), supplemental information was submitted by Duke Energy. The NRC staff has reviewed the supplemental information and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to (1) perform its detailed technical review, and (2) make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of the public health and safety and environment.
 
B. Waldrep Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified, despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence. If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2760 or Martha.Barillas@nrc.gov. Docket No. 50-400 cc w/enclosure: Distribution via Listserv Sincerely, Martha C. Barillas, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation B. Waldrep Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified, despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence. If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2760 or Martha.Barillas@nrc.gov. Docket No. 50-400 Sincerely, /RA/ Martha C. Barillas, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc w/enclosure: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION: PUBLIC RidsNrrLABClayton RidsNrrDorllpl2-2 RidsN rrDraApla RidsNRRLIC109 ADAMS Accession RidsNrrPMShearonHarris RidsNrrDorlDpr LPL2-2 R/F RidsN rrDssStsb RidsNrrDorl N ML 15275A357 o.: OFFICE NRR/DORULPL2-2/PM NRR/DORULPL2-2/LA NAME MBarillas BClavton (LRonewicz for) DATE 10/5/2015 10/5/2015 OFFICE NRR/DRA/APLA
By letter dated August 18, 2015 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15236A265), Duke Energy Progress, Inc. (Duke Energy) requested an amendment to the Technical Specifications (TSs) of Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-63 for Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1. The proposed amendment would revise the TSs by relocating specific surveillance frequencies to a licensee-controlled program with the adoption of Technical Specification Task Force Traveler-425, Revision 3, "Relocate Surveillance Frequencies to Licensee Control - RITSTF [Risk-Informed Technical Specification Task Force] Initiative Sb." Additionally, the change would add a new program, the Surveillance Frequency Control Program, to TS Section 6, "Administrative Controls."
* NRR/DORULPL2-2/BC NAME SRosenbera SHelton DATE 10/6/2015 10/8/2015 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY MBiro, NRR RidsRgn2MailCenter RidsACRS MailCTR RidsNrrDorl *b "'e-ma1 NRR/DSS/STSB RElliott 9/18/2015 NRR/DORULPL2-2/PM MBarillas 10/8/2015}}
On September 16, 2015, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff held a conference call with members of your staff to discuss insufficiencies identified during the acceptance review of the amendment request. Specifically, the amendment did not adequately provide the facts and observations (F&Os) from the peer reviews and gap assessments of the internal events probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) which are open, not met, or met at capability category I, nor explain how the F&Os were dispositioned for this application. The NRC staff requested that Duke Energy provide an overview of the changes in the internal events PRA that occurred after the 2007 peer review and clarify whether any of these changes qualify as a PRA upgrade that would require a focused scope peer review. By letter dated September 18, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15259A435), you were informed of the above insufficiencies and informed that the license amendment request would need to be supplemented by September 30, 2015.
By letter dated September 29, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15272A443), supplemental information was submitted by Duke Energy. The NRC staff has reviewed the supplemental information and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to (1) perform its detailed technical review, and (2) make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of the public health and safety and environment.
 
B. Waldrep                                     Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified, despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2760 or Martha.Barillas@nrc.gov.
Sincerely, Martha C. Barillas, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-400 cc w/enclosure: Distribution via Listserv
 
ML15275A357                                      *b"'e-ma1 OFFICE         NRR/DORULPL2-2/PM           NRR/DORULPL2-2/LA             NRR/DSS/STSB NAME           MBarillas                   BClavton (LRonewicz for)       RElliott DATE           10/5/2015                   10/5/2015                      9/18/2015 OFFICE         NRR/DRA/APLA*               NRR/DORULPL2-2/BC             NRR/DORULPL2-2/PM NAME           SRosenbera                 SHelton                       MBarillas DATE           10/6/2015                   10/8/2015                     10/8/2015}}

Latest revision as of 07:06, 31 October 2019

Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action for Technical Specification Change Regarding Risk-Informed Justification for the Relocation of Specific Surveillance Frequency Requirements to a Licensee Controlled Program
ML15275A357
Person / Time
Site: Harris Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/08/2015
From: Martha Barillas
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Waldrep B
Progress Energy Carolinas
Barillas M, NRR/DORL, 415-2760
References
TAC MF6583
Download: ML15275A357 (3)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 October 8, 2015 Mr. Benjamin C. Waldrep Site Vice President Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant 5413 Shearon Harris Rd.

M/C HNP01 New Hill, NC 27562-0165

SUBJECT:

SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1 -ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION FOR TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REGARDING RISK-INFORMED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE RELOCATION OF SPECIFIC SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY REQUIREMENTS TO A LICENSEE CONTROLLED PROGRAM (TAC NO. MF6583)

Dear Mr. Waldrep:

By letter dated August 18, 2015 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15236A265), Duke Energy Progress, Inc. (Duke Energy) requested an amendment to the Technical Specifications (TSs) of Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-63 for Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1. The proposed amendment would revise the TSs by relocating specific surveillance frequencies to a licensee-controlled program with the adoption of Technical Specification Task Force Traveler-425, Revision 3, "Relocate Surveillance Frequencies to Licensee Control - RITSTF [Risk-Informed Technical Specification Task Force] Initiative Sb." Additionally, the change would add a new program, the Surveillance Frequency Control Program, to TS Section 6, "Administrative Controls."

On September 16, 2015, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff held a conference call with members of your staff to discuss insufficiencies identified during the acceptance review of the amendment request. Specifically, the amendment did not adequately provide the facts and observations (F&Os) from the peer reviews and gap assessments of the internal events probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) which are open, not met, or met at capability category I, nor explain how the F&Os were dispositioned for this application. The NRC staff requested that Duke Energy provide an overview of the changes in the internal events PRA that occurred after the 2007 peer review and clarify whether any of these changes qualify as a PRA upgrade that would require a focused scope peer review. By letter dated September 18, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15259A435), you were informed of the above insufficiencies and informed that the license amendment request would need to be supplemented by September 30, 2015.

By letter dated September 29, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15272A443), supplemental information was submitted by Duke Energy. The NRC staff has reviewed the supplemental information and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to (1) perform its detailed technical review, and (2) make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of the public health and safety and environment.

B. Waldrep Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified, despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2760 or Martha.Barillas@nrc.gov.

Sincerely, Martha C. Barillas, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-400 cc w/enclosure: Distribution via Listserv

ML15275A357 *b"'e-ma1 OFFICE NRR/DORULPL2-2/PM NRR/DORULPL2-2/LA NRR/DSS/STSB NAME MBarillas BClavton (LRonewicz for) RElliott DATE 10/5/2015 10/5/2015 9/18/2015 OFFICE NRR/DRA/APLA* NRR/DORULPL2-2/BC NRR/DORULPL2-2/PM NAME SRosenbera SHelton MBarillas DATE 10/6/2015 10/8/2015 10/8/2015