ML17208A881: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 07/28/1980
| issue date = 07/28/1980
| title = Advises That No Antitrust Hearing Is Necessary W/Respect to Proposed Amend to CP
| title = Advises That No Antitrust Hearing Is Necessary W/Respect to Proposed Amend to CP
| author name = LITVAK S M
| author name = Litvak S
| author affiliation = JUSTICE, DEPT. OF
| author affiliation = JUSTICE, DEPT. OF
| addressee name = SHAPAR H K
| addressee name = Shapar H
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
| docket = 05000389
| docket = 05000389
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:0 P ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL ANTITRUST OIVISION El1ltRI ShlfcS Qcpitl'flllcllt Of ptl5tl[c iYAsliINGTON, D.C.20530 3 8 JUL 1980 Howard K.Shapar Executive Legal Director United States Nuclear Commission Washington, D.C.20555 Re: Florida Power h Light Company (St.Lucie Nuclear Generating Station, Unit No.2)NRC Docket No.50-389A  
{{#Wiki_filter:El1ltRI ShlfcS Qcpitl'flllclltOf ptl5tl[c iYAsliINGTON,D.C. 20530 0
P 3 8 JUL 1980 ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL ANTITRUST OIVISION Howard K. Shapar Executive Legal Director United States Nuclear Commission Washington,           D.C. 20555 Re:   Florida Power h Light Company (St. Lucie Nuclear Generating Station, Unit No. 2) NRC Docket No. 50-389A


==Dear Mr.Shapar:==
==Dear Mr. Shapar:==
You have requested our advice pursuant to Section l05(c)of the Atomic Energy Act, as amended, regarding a proposed amend-ment to the construction permit of the above referenced nuclear unit to allow the City of Orlando, Florida and Orlando Utili-ties Commission (collectively referred to as"Orlando")to be-come a co-owner of that unit.You have informed us that the Orlando Utilities Commission is part of the government of the City of Orlando but title to real estate is normally taken in the name of both the City of Orlando and the Orlando Utilities Commission.
 
Orlando will acquire a 6.08951 percent ownership share of St.Lucie Unit No.2 which will be operated by Florida Power&Light Co.Our review of the information submitted for antitrust re-view purposes, as well as other information available to the Department, provides no basis at this time to conclude that the participation in St.Lucie Unit No.2 by Orlando would=create or maintain a situation inconsistent with the antitrust laws.Accordingly, it is the Department's view that no antitrust hearing is necessary with respect to the proposed amendment to the construction permit.nce rely, S or.L tv Assis ant A torney General Antitru t Division 80 08080 061, I N$l(}}
You have requested our advice pursuant to Section l05(c) of the Atomic Energy Act, as amended, regarding a proposed amend-ment to the construction permit of the above referenced nuclear unit to allow the City of Orlando, Florida and"Orlando"              Orlando Utili-ties     Commission       (collectively       referred     to as             ) to be-come a         co-owner   of that   unit.     You have   informed   us that   the Orlando         Utilities   Commission     is part   of the   government   of the City of         Orlando   but title   to   real   estate   is normally taken   in Utilities the name         of both the   City   of Orlando     and   the Orlando Commission.           Orlando will acquire a 6.08951 percent ownership share of St. Lucie Unit No. 2 which will be operated by Florida Power       &   Light Co.
Our review       of the information submitted for antitrust re-view purposes, as well as other information available to the Department, provides no basis at this time to conclude that the participation in St. Lucie Unit No. 2 by Orlando would= create or maintain a situation inconsistent with the antitrust laws.
Accordingly, it is the Department's view that no antitrust hearing is necessary with respect to the proposed amendment to the construction permit.
nce rely, S     or     . L tv Assis ant A torney General Antitru t Division 80 08080 061,
 
I N   l(
    $}}

Latest revision as of 01:18, 30 October 2019

Advises That No Antitrust Hearing Is Necessary W/Respect to Proposed Amend to CP
ML17208A881
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/28/1980
From: Litvak S
JUSTICE, DEPT. OF
To: Shapar H
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
Shared Package
ML17208A880 List:
References
ISSUANCES-A, NUDOCS 8008080061
Download: ML17208A881 (2)
v • d • e


Text

El1ltRI ShlfcS Qcpitl'flllclltOf ptl5tl[c iYAsliINGTON,D.C. 20530 0

P 3 8 JUL 1980 ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL ANTITRUST OIVISION Howard K. Shapar Executive Legal Director United States Nuclear Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Re: Florida Power h Light Company (St. Lucie Nuclear Generating Station, Unit No. 2) NRC Docket No. 50-389A

Dear Mr. Shapar:

You have requested our advice pursuant to Section l05(c) of the Atomic Energy Act, as amended, regarding a proposed amend-ment to the construction permit of the above referenced nuclear unit to allow the City of Orlando, Florida and"Orlando" Orlando Utili-ties Commission (collectively referred to as ) to be-come a co-owner of that unit. You have informed us that the Orlando Utilities Commission is part of the government of the City of Orlando but title to real estate is normally taken in Utilities the name of both the City of Orlando and the Orlando Commission. Orlando will acquire a 6.08951 percent ownership share of St. Lucie Unit No. 2 which will be operated by Florida Power & Light Co.

Our review of the information submitted for antitrust re-view purposes, as well as other information available to the Department, provides no basis at this time to conclude that the participation in St. Lucie Unit No. 2 by Orlando would= create or maintain a situation inconsistent with the antitrust laws.

Accordingly, it is the Department's view that no antitrust hearing is necessary with respect to the proposed amendment to the construction permit.

nce rely, S or . L tv Assis ant A torney General Antitru t Division 80 08080 061,

I N l(

$

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17208A881&oldid=2005439"