ML17208A881: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 07/28/1980
| issue date = 07/28/1980
| title = Advises That No Antitrust Hearing Is Necessary W/Respect to Proposed Amend to CP
| title = Advises That No Antitrust Hearing Is Necessary W/Respect to Proposed Amend to CP
| author name = LITVAK S M
| author name = Litvak S
| author affiliation = JUSTICE, DEPT. OF
| author affiliation = JUSTICE, DEPT. OF
| addressee name = SHAPAR H K
| addressee name = Shapar H
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
| docket = 05000389
| docket = 05000389
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:0PASSISTANTATTORNEYGENERALANTITRUSTOIVISIONEl1ltRIShlfcSQcpitl'flllclltOfptl5tl[ciYAsliINGTON,D.C.2053038JUL1980HowardK.ShaparExecutiveLegalDirectorUnitedStatesNuclearCommissionWashington,D.C.20555Re:FloridaPowerhLightCompany(St.LucieNuclearGeneratingStation,UnitNo.2)NRCDocketNo.50-389A
{{#Wiki_filter:El1ltRI ShlfcS Qcpitl'flllclltOf ptl5tl[c iYAsliINGTON,D.C. 20530 0
P 3 8 JUL 1980 ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL ANTITRUST OIVISION Howard K. Shapar Executive Legal Director United States Nuclear Commission Washington,           D.C. 20555 Re:   Florida Power h Light Company (St. Lucie Nuclear Generating Station, Unit No. 2) NRC Docket No. 50-389A


==DearMr.Shapar:==
==Dear Mr. Shapar:==
YouhaverequestedouradvicepursuanttoSectionl05(c)oftheAtomicEnergyAct,asamended,regardingaproposedamend-menttotheconstructionpermitoftheabovereferencednuclearunittoallowtheCityofOrlando,FloridaandOrlandoUtili-tiesCommission(collectivelyreferredtoas"Orlando")tobe-comeaco-ownerofthatunit.YouhaveinformedusthattheOrlandoUtilitiesCommissionispartofthegovernmentoftheCityofOrlandobuttitletorealestateisnormallytakeninthenameofboththeCityofOrlandoandtheOrlandoUtilitiesCommission.Orlandowillacquirea6.08951percentownershipshareofSt.LucieUnitNo.2whichwillbeoperatedbyFloridaPower&LightCo.Ourreviewoftheinformationsubmittedforantitrustre-viewpurposes,aswellasotherinformationavailabletotheDepartment,providesnobasisatthistimetoconcludethattheparticipationinSt.LucieUnitNo.2byOrlandowould=createormaintainasituationinconsistentwiththeantitrustlaws.Accordingly,itistheDepartment'sviewthatnoantitrusthearingisnecessarywithrespecttotheproposedamendmenttotheconstructionpermit.ncerely,Sor.LtvAssisantAtorneyGeneralAntitrutDivision8008080061, IN$l(}}
 
You have requested our advice pursuant to Section l05(c) of the Atomic Energy Act, as amended, regarding a proposed amend-ment to the construction permit of the above referenced nuclear unit to allow the City of Orlando, Florida and"Orlando"               Orlando Utili-ties      Commission      (collectively      referred    to  as            ) to be-come a        co-owner    of  that  unit.     You  have  informed    us that  the Orlando          Utilities    Commission      is  part  of  the  government  of  the City of          Orlando  but  title    to  real  estate    is  normally  taken  in Utilities the name          of  both  the  City  of  Orlando    and  the  Orlando Commission.           Orlando will acquire a 6.08951 percent ownership share of St. Lucie Unit No. 2 which will be operated by Florida Power      &   Light  Co.
Our review      of the information submitted for antitrust re-view purposes, as well as other information available to the Department, provides no basis at this time to conclude that the participation in St. Lucie Unit No. 2 by Orlando would= create or maintain a situation inconsistent with the antitrust laws.
Accordingly, it is the Department's view that no antitrust hearing is necessary with respect to the proposed amendment to the construction permit.
nce rely, S    or    . L tv Assis ant A torney General Antitru t Division 80 08080 061,
 
I N  l(
    $}}

Latest revision as of 01:18, 30 October 2019

Advises That No Antitrust Hearing Is Necessary W/Respect to Proposed Amend to CP
ML17208A881
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/28/1980
From: Litvak S
JUSTICE, DEPT. OF
To: Shapar H
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
Shared Package
ML17208A880 List:
References
ISSUANCES-A, NUDOCS 8008080061
Download: ML17208A881 (2)


Text

El1ltRI ShlfcS Qcpitl'flllclltOf ptl5tl[c iYAsliINGTON,D.C. 20530 0

P 3 8 JUL 1980 ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL ANTITRUST OIVISION Howard K. Shapar Executive Legal Director United States Nuclear Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Re: Florida Power h Light Company (St. Lucie Nuclear Generating Station, Unit No. 2) NRC Docket No. 50-389A

Dear Mr. Shapar:

You have requested our advice pursuant to Section l05(c) of the Atomic Energy Act, as amended, regarding a proposed amend-ment to the construction permit of the above referenced nuclear unit to allow the City of Orlando, Florida and"Orlando" Orlando Utili-ties Commission (collectively referred to as ) to be-come a co-owner of that unit. You have informed us that the Orlando Utilities Commission is part of the government of the City of Orlando but title to real estate is normally taken in Utilities the name of both the City of Orlando and the Orlando Commission. Orlando will acquire a 6.08951 percent ownership share of St. Lucie Unit No. 2 which will be operated by Florida Power & Light Co.

Our review of the information submitted for antitrust re-view purposes, as well as other information available to the Department, provides no basis at this time to conclude that the participation in St. Lucie Unit No. 2 by Orlando would= create or maintain a situation inconsistent with the antitrust laws.

Accordingly, it is the Department's view that no antitrust hearing is necessary with respect to the proposed amendment to the construction permit.

nce rely, S or . L tv Assis ant A torney General Antitru t Division 80 08080 061,

I N l(

$