ML18030A473: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 11/06/1980
| issue date = 11/06/1980
| title = Motion for Partial Summary Disposition of Contention 2 Re Health Effects of Discharged Chlorine.Responses Due within Three Wks from Present Filing
| title = Motion for Partial Summary Disposition of Contention 2 Re Health Effects of Discharged Chlorine.Responses Due within Three Wks from Present Filing
| author name = SILBERG J E, TRAVIESODIAZ
| author name = Silberg J, Traviesodiaz
| author affiliation = ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT CO., SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE
| author affiliation = ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT CO., SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:tNovember 6,      <0 cc;; .-~
UNITED STAT"S OF AMERICA
          "-7liC S    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING In the Matter of                              )
                                              )
PENNSYLVANIA POWER      &  LZGHT  COi~EPANY  )    Docket Nos. 50-387~
and                        )                  50-388, ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE          INC. )
                                              )
(Susquehanna Steam      Electric Station,    )
Units 1 and 2)                              )
APPLICANTS'OTION -FOR      SUi~lMARY DISPOSITION    OF CONTENiTION 2  (CHLORINE)
Pennsylvania Power 6 Light Company and Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Znc. ("Applicants" ) move the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, pursuant to g2.749 of the Commission's Rules of Practice  (10 C.F.R.      $ 2.749)  and the Special Prehearing    Conference Order, LBP-79-6,    9 NRC    291, 328 (March 6, 1979),      for summary    dis-position in Applicants'avor of that portion of Contention 2 in this proceeding which alleges that the health effects of chlorine discharged into the Susquehanna River have not been adequately assessed. As grounds for their Motion, Applicants allege that there is no genuine issue of material fact to be heard with respect to this aspect of Contention 2 and that Applicants are entitled to a decision in their favor on it as a matter of law.
This Motion is supported by the Affidavit of James Rios In Support of Summary Disposition of Contention 2 (Chlorine), Appli-cants'tatement of Material Facts As To Which There Zs No Genuine Issue 'To Be Heard    (Contention 2-Chlorine), and Applicants Brie In Support of Motion For Summary Disposition Of Contention 2 (Chlorine),
 
all filed  simultaneously herewith, together with    all pleadings and other papers in this proceeding.
As set forth in the Special Prehearing Conference Order, supra, 9 NRC at 328, responses to this Motion are due three weeks from its filing date.
Respectfully submitted,,
SHAW~ P ITTMAN~ POTTS    & TROWBRIDGE By J        z.lb rg M  t'  .
                                              . Travieso-Diaz r
Counsel  for Applicants
                            ~
                              ~
1800  M  Street,  N. W.
Washington, D. C.      20036 (202) 331-4100 Dat d:    November 6, 1980}}

Latest revision as of 00:39, 22 October 2019

Motion for Partial Summary Disposition of Contention 2 Re Health Effects of Discharged Chlorine.Responses Due within Three Wks from Present Filing
ML18030A473
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/06/1980
From: Silberg J, Traviesodiaz
ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT CO., SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML18030A019 List:
References
NUDOCS 8011130334
Download: ML18030A473 (2)
v • d • e


Text

tNovember 6, <0 cc;; .-~

UNITED STAT"S OF AMERICA

"-7liC S NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING In the Matter of )

)

PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LZGHT COi~EPANY ) Docket Nos. 50-387~

and ) 50-388, ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC. )

)

(Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, )

Units 1 and 2) )

APPLICANTS'OTION -FOR SUi~lMARY DISPOSITION OF CONTENiTION 2 (CHLORINE)

Pennsylvania Power 6 Light Company and Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Znc. ("Applicants" ) move the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, pursuant to g2.749 of the Commission's Rules of Practice (10 C.F.R. $ 2.749) and the Special Prehearing Conference Order, LBP-79-6, 9 NRC 291, 328 (March 6, 1979), for summary dis-position in Applicants'avor of that portion of Contention 2 in this proceeding which alleges that the health effects of chlorine discharged into the Susquehanna River have not been adequately assessed. As grounds for their Motion, Applicants allege that there is no genuine issue of material fact to be heard with respect to this aspect of Contention 2 and that Applicants are entitled to a decision in their favor on it as a matter of law.

This Motion is supported by the Affidavit of James Rios In Support of Summary Disposition of Contention 2 (Chlorine), Appli-cants'tatement of Material Facts As To Which There Zs No Genuine Issue 'To Be Heard (Contention 2-Chlorine), and Applicants Brie In Support of Motion For Summary Disposition Of Contention 2 (Chlorine),

all filed simultaneously herewith, together with all pleadings and other papers in this proceeding.

As set forth in the Special Prehearing Conference Order, supra, 9 NRC at 328, responses to this Motion are due three weeks from its filing date.

Respectfully submitted,,

SHAW~ P ITTMAN~ POTTS & TROWBRIDGE By J z.lb rg M t' .

. Travieso-Diaz r

Counsel for Applicants

~

~

1800 M Street, N. W.

Washington, D. C. 20036 (202) 331-4100 Dat d: November 6, 1980

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18030A473&oldid=1954586"