ML15203A010

Audit of the Licensee'S Management of Regulatory Commitments (TAC Nos. MF6129 and MF6130)

ML15203A010
Person / Time
Site:	Cook
Issue date:	07/29/2015
From:	Dietrich A Plant Licensing Branch III
To:	Weber L Indiana Michigan Power Co
Dietrich A
References
TAC MF6129, TAC MF6130
Download: ML15203A010 (13)

Text

Mr. Lawrence J. Weber Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 July 29, 2015 Indiana Michigan Power Company Nuclear Generation Group One Cook Place Bridgman, Ml 49106

SUBJECT:

DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 -AUDIT OF THE LICENSEE'S MANAGEMENT OF REGULA TORY COMMITMENTS (TAC NOS. MF6129 AND MF6130)

Dear Mr. Weber:

In U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Regulatory Issue Summary 2000-17, "Managing Regulatory Commitments Made by Power Reactor Licensees to the NRC Staff," dated September 21, 2000 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML003741774), the NRC informed licensees that the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) document NEI 99-04, "Guidelines for Managing NRC Commitment Changes," contains acceptable guidance for controlling regulatory commitments and encouraged licensees to use the NEI guidance or similar administrative controls to ensure that regulatory commitments are implemented, that changes to the regulatory commitments are evaluated, and when appropriate, reported to the NRC. The NRC's Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation has instructed its staff to perform an audit of the licensees' commitment management programs once every three years to determine whether the licensees' programs are consistent with the industry guidance in NEI 99-04, and whether regulatory commitments are being effectively implemented.

An audit of the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (CNP) commitment management program was performed at the plant site on July 15, 16, and 17, 2015. The NRC staff concludes, based on the audit, that Indiana Michigan Power Company (l&M, the licensee) has implemented NRC commitments on a timely basis, and that the licensee has implemented an effective program for managing NRC commitment changes at CNP. The details of the results of the audit are set forth in the enclosed audit report.

L. Weber There is no need for the licensee to respond to this letter. The NRC staff appreciates the resources that were made available by your staff during the audit. If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2846.

Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316

Enclosure:

Audit Report cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv Sincerely, Allison W. Dietrich, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 111-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 AUDIT REPORT BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION LICENSEE MANAGEMENT OF REGULATORY COMMITMENTS INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT. UNITS 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-315 AND 50-316

1.0 INTRODUCTION

AND BACKGROUND The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) informed licensees in Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) 2000-17, "Managing Regulatory Commitments Made by Power Reactor Licensees to the NRC Staff," dated September 21, 2000 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML003741774), that the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) document NEI 99-04, "Guidelines for Managing NRC Commitment Changes," contains acceptable guidance for controlling regulatory commitments.

RIS 2000-17 encouraged licensees to use the NEI guidance or similar administrative controls to ensure that regulatory commitments are implemented and that changes to the regulatory commitments are evaluated and, when appropriate, reported to the NRC. NEI 99-04 describes a "regulatory commitment" as an explicit statement to take a specific action agreed to, or volunteered by, a licensee by a certain date and submitted in writing on the docket to the NRC. The NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) has instructed its staff to perform an audit of licensees' commitment management programs once every 3 years to determine whether the licensees' programs are consistent with the industry guidance in NEI 99-04, and whether regulatory commitments are being effectively implemented.

An audit of the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (CNP) commitment management program was performed at the plant site on July 15, 16, and 17, 2015. The audit reviewed commitments made, changed, or closed since the previous audit in June 2012 (see audit report dated June 29, 2012; ADAMS Accession No. ML12178A028).

NRR guidelines direct the project manager to audit the licensee's commitment management program by assessing the adequacy of the licensee's implementation of a sample of commitments made to the NRC in past licensing actions (i.e., amendments, reliefs, exemptions, etc.) and activities (i.e., bulletins, generic letters, etc.). 2.0 AUDIT PROCEDURE AND RESULTS The audit consisted of three major parts: (1) verification of the licensee's implementation of NRC commitments that have been completed, (2) verification of the licensee's program for managing Enclosure changes to NRC commitments, and (3) verification that all regulatory commitments reviewed were correctly applied in NRC staff licensing action reviews. 2.1 Audit Scope The audit addressed a sample of commitments made during the review period. The audit focused on regulatory commitments (as defined above) made in writing to the NRC as a result of past licensing actions (i.e., amendments, exemptions, etc.), or licensing activities (i.e., bulletins, generic letters, etc.). Before the audit, the NRC staff searched ADAMS for the licensee's submittals since the last audit, and selected a representative sample for verification.

The audit excluded the following types of commitments that are internal to licensee processes:

(1) Commitments made on the licensee's own initiative among internal organizational components.

(2) Commitments that pertain to milestones of licensing actions/activities (e.g., respond to an*NRC request for additional information by a certain date). Fulfillment of these commitments was indicated by the fact that the subject licensing action/activity was completed.

(3) Commitments made as an internal reminder to take actions to comply with existing regulatory requirements such as regulations and technical specifications.

Fulfillment of these commitments was indicated by the licensee having taken timely action in accordance with the subject requirements.

Procedure PMP-2350-CMS-001, "Commitment Management," Revision 8, is the primary procedure for the handling of regulatory commitments.

This procedure contains guidance for the identification, tracking, extension, change, and closure of commitment tasks. In addition, it provides a list of the people who are authorized to make regulatory commitments for CNP, as well as guidance for the retention and periodic review of commitments.

The licensee's commitments are tracked in a computer database called the Commitment Management System (CMS). The NRC staff reviewed commitment tracking entries and observed the use of CMS to search for commitments.

The CMS system is unique to CNP. The NRC staff also reviewed the following Data Sheets included in PMP-2350-CMS-001:

• Data Sheet 1, "Commitment Evaluation/Change"

• Data Sheet 2, "Commitment Implementation/Closure Form"

• Data Sheet 3, "Commitment Management Data Input Form" 2.2 Verification of Licensee's Implementation of Commitments The primary focus of this part of the audit is to confirm that the licensee has implemented commitments made to the NRC as part of past licensing actions and activities.

For commitments not yet implemented, the NRC staff determines whether they have been captured in an effective program for future implementation.

The audit also verifies that the licensee's CMS includes a mechanism to ensure traceability of commitments following initial implementation.

This ensures that licensee personnel are able to recognize that future proposed changes to the affected design features or operating practices require evaluation in accordance with the commitment change control process. 2.2.1 Audit Results -Implementation of Commitments The attached Audit Summary, Table 1, provides details of this portion of the audit and its results. The NRC staff reviewed the closure documentation for nine closed commitments.

All closed commitments were properly documented using Data Sheet 2, "Commitment Implementation/Closure Form." The NRC staff also reviewed two commitments, numbered 8610 and 8611, that were placed in an "ongoing" status following implementation.

According to PMP-2350-CMS-001, the definition of an ongoing commitment is as follows: Actions implemented by CNP procedures, instruction, policies, or other documents that require continued tracking to maintain compliance.

A commitment that does not have an applicable conclusion and/or closure date; i.e., one requiring a given action on a repetitive basis. Ongoing commitments are reviewed every 3 to 5 years to determine if they should be retained as ongoing or be retired. The periodic review also ensures that commitments are referenced correctly in implementing documents.

Commitments 8610 and 8611 were placed in an ongoing status using Data Sheet 2, with a note at the bottom specifying that the commitments were not being closed. Overall, the NRC staff concludes that PMP-2350-CMS-001 and the associated commitment management forms used in conjunction with the CMS database constitute an effective program to identify, manage, review, and close commitments made to the NRC as part of licensing actions and activities.

2.3 Verification of Licensee's Program for Managing Commitment Changes The primary focus of this part of the audit is to verify that the licensee has established administrative controls for modifying or deleting commitments made to the NRC. Accordingly, the NRC staff compared PMP-2350-CMS-001 and Data Sheet 1, "Commitment Evaluation/Change," to the guidelines in NEI 99-04, which the NRC has found to be an acceptable guide for licensees to follow for managing and changing commitments.

The audit reviewed a sample of commitment changes that included changes that were or will be reported to the NRC, and changes that were not or will not be reported to the NRC. 2.3.1 Audit Results -Managing Commitment Changes The attached Audit Summary, Table 1, provides details of this portion of the audit and its results. The NRC staff reviewed the revision documents for four changed commitments.

Each change was evaluated using Data Sheet 1, "Commitment Evaluation/Change," to determine whether or not the change could be made through the commitment change process, and whether or not NRC notification was required.

Three of the revised commitments required NRC notification, while one did not. The NRC staff found that PMP-2350-CMS-001 and Data Sheet 1, "Commitment Evaluation/Change," follows the guidance of NEI 99-04 closely in regard to managing commitment changes. The NRC staff observed that the licensee had complete and accurate records, and had documented the sampled commitment changes appropriately using Data Sheet 1, "Commitment Evaluation/Change." The NRC staff observed that overall, the licensee tracking system was effective in documenting the commitment change process, ensuring traceability of commitments, and considering reporting requirements.

2.4 Review to Identify Misapplied Commitments The commitments reviewed for this audit were also evaluated to determine if they had been misapplied.

A commitment is considered to be misapplied if the action comprising the commitment was relied on by the NRC staff in making a regulatory decision such as a finding of public health and safety in an NRC safety evaluation associated with a licensing action. Reliance on an action to support a regulatory decision must be elevated from a regulatory commitment to a legal obligation (e.g., license condition, condition of a relief request, regulatory exemption limitation or condition).

A commitment is also considered to have been misapplied if the commitment involves actions that were safety significant (i.e., commitments used to ensure safety). Each of the commitments selected for the audit sample were reviewed to determine if any had been misapplied.

No misapplied commitments were found. 2.4.1 Review of Safety Evaluations for Licensing Actions since the Last Audit In addition to the commitments selected for the audit sample, all license amendment safety evaluations, exemptions, and relief request safety evaluations that have been issued for a facility since the last audit were identified.

These documents were evaluated to determine if they contained any misapplied commitments as described above. No misapplied commitments were found.

3.0 CONCLUSION

The NRC staff concludes, based on this audit, that the licensee has (1) an effective program for managing and implementing regulatory commitments, and (2) an effective program for managing changes to regulatory commitments. 4.0 LICENSEE PERSONNEL CONTACTED FOR THIS AUDIT K. Henderson Principal Contributors:

A. Dietrich Date: July 29, 2015

Attachment:

Table 1, Audit Summary Commitment No(s). and Descriptions 8246 8252 Related to License Renewal 8541 Related to Temperature Coefficient Limit Report TABLE 1 Audit Summary Indiana Michigan Power Company Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316 Review Auditor's Assessment l&M letter dated October 31, 2003 (ADAMS Accession Commitment 8246 was revised to add reference to iron No. ML033070177), contained 29 regulatory and copper piping, and the NRC was notified by letter commitments in an attachment to the Application for dated October 17, 2013 (ADAMS Accession Renewed Operating Licenses.

Two commitments were No. ML13295A422).

reviewed.

Commitment 8246 was closed on March 26, 2014, Commitment 8246: The Buried Piping Inspection upon implementation into procedures Program will be implemented prior to the period of PMP-5020-001-001, Maintenance Permits, and extended operation for each unit: October 25, 2014, for EHl-5070-UPTI.

Unit 1, December 23, 2017, for Unit 2. Commitment 8252 was closed on April 9, 2014, upon Commitment 8252: Enhance the Instrument Air implementation into procedures Quality Program procedure to clearly specify 12-THP-6040-PER-005, "Control Air Performance frequencies for the dewpoint and dryer tours prior to the Monitoring," and Preventative Maintenance Task period of extended operation for each unit: October 25, (PMID 00104035).

2014, for Unit 1, December 23, 2017, for Unit 2. Commitments 8246 and 8252 were revised and closed appropriately.

l&M letter dated September 14, 2011 (ADAMS Westinghouse completed the analysis of the modeling Accession No. ML11270A095}, contained a regulatory error, and documented it under vendor report commitment as an enclosure to the Unit 1 Cycle 23 End L TR-N0-12-37, Revision 1. of Life Moderator Temperature Coefficient Limit Report. A letter notifying the NRC of the conclusion of the Commitment 8541: Following receipt of the formal analysis was submitted on August 23, 2012 (ADAMS notification of the effect of the modeling error on physics Accession No. ML12250A660).

testing results from the fuel vendor, update the NRC with the results of those analyses, by September 30, Commitment 8541 was closed appropriately.

2012. Attachment Commitment No(s). and Descriptions 8549 Response to Title 1 0 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.54(f) information request related to thermal conductivity degradation (TCD) TABLE 1 Audit Summary (Continued) Review Auditor's Assessment l&M letter dated March 19, 2012 (ADAMS Accession The completion date was revised to state the following:

No. ML12088A104), contained a regulatory commitment in response to information request under 10 CFR The Unit 2 LBLOCA analysis will be submitted 50.54(f) related to TCD. 28 months from the approval of the last topical report (WCAP-17642-P or WCAP-16996-P), Commitment 8549: Submit to the NRC for review and any required supplements, that support the unit-specific large break loss of coolant accident new 10 CFR 50.46 rule and would be needed (LBLOCA) analyses that apply NRC approved methods for the analysis.

The Unit 1 LBLOCA analysis that include the effects of fuel TCD, by December 15, will be submitted 34 months from the approval 2016. The date for the analysis submittal is projected of the last topical report (WCAP-17642-P or on the following milestones needed to perform a revised WCAP-16996-P), and any required licensing basis LBLOCA analysis with an NRC supplements, that support the new 10 CFR approved ECCS Evaluation Model that explicitly 50.46 rule and would be needed for the accounts for TCD: analysis.

1) Submittal by Westinghouse, to the NRG for The NRG was informed of the change in completion review and approval, of a revised fuel date, and minor changes to the commitment wording, performance and LBLOCA Evaluation model by letter dated June 9, 2015 (ADAMS Accession methodologies that include the effects of TCD. No. ML15162A095).

2) NRG approval of WCAP-17642-P, a fuel Commitment 8549 was revised appropriately.

performance analysis methodology that includes the effects of TCD. 3) NRG approval of WCAP-176996-P, and any required Supplements thereto, a LBLOCA Evaluation Model that includes the effects of TCD and accommodates the ongoing 10 CFR 50.46(c) rulemaking process.

Commitment No(s). and Descriptions 8570/8571 8572/8573 Related to Reactor Vessel Internals (RVI) Aging Management Program (AMP) split pins and components 8600 Response to Generic Letter (GL) 2004-02 TABLE 1 Audit Summary (Continued) Review Auditor's Assessment l&M letter dated October 1, 2012 (ADAMS Accession The strategy for managing split pins was submitted to No. ML12284A320), contained 10 regulatory the NRC by letter dated June 30, 2014 (ADAMS commitments (five per unit) regarding the RVI AMP. Accession No. ML14216A497).

In the letter, l&M Four of these commitments were reviewed.

committed to replace CNP Unit 1 split pins during the fall 2017 refueling outage, and Unit 2 split pins during Commitments 8570 and 8571 for Units 1 and 2: the fall 2016 refueling outage. l&M also committed to Investigate split pin replacement for each unit. Provide provide to the NRC the type of replacement split pin the NRC with the strategy for managing split pins prior material prior to split pin replacement in each unit. to the end of extended operation for each unit: October 25, 2014, for Unit 1, December 23, 2017, for Commitments 8570 and 8571 were closed Unit 2. appropriately.

Commitments 8572 and 8573 for Units 1 and 2: The results of the PWROG evaluation were submitted Verify that all the RVI components within the scope for to the NRC by letter dated October 22, 2014 (ADAMS license renewal have been considered in applicable Accession No. ML14316A449).

documents in development of MRP-227-A.

l&M is participating in Pressurized-Water Reactor Owners Commitments 8572 and 8573 were closed Group (PWROG) project PA-MSC-0938 to address this appropriately.

item. The results will be provided to the NRC prior to the period of extended operation for each unit: October 25, 2014, for Unit 1, December 23, 2017, for Unit 2. l&M letter dated May 15, 2013 (ADAMS Accession Commitment 8600 is open and is being tracked No. ML13137A046), contained a regulatory commitment appropriately.

in response to GL 2004-02, "Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors" (ADAMS Accession No. ML042360586).

Commitment 8600: l&M will perform the necessary analysis to adopt a higher in-vessel debris limit by the completion of the third Unit 2 refueling outage following January 1, 2013 (fall 2016).

Commitment No(s). and Descriptions 8602 Response to GL 2008-01 8606 Related to Containment Leakage Rate Testing program TABLE 1 Audit Summary (Continued) Review Auditor's Assessment l&M letter dated March 7, 2014 (ADAMS Accession The completion date was revised to January 29, 2016, No. ML14070A344), contained a regulatory commitment and the NRG was informed via letter dated June 24, in response to GL 2008-01, "Managing Gas 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15181A256).

Accumulation in Emergency Core Cooling, Decay Heat Removal, and Containment Spray Systems" (ADAMS Commitment 8602 was revised appropriately.

Accession No. ML072910759).

Commitment 8602: Conduct additional technical evaluation of emergency core cooling systems, residual heat removal system, and containment spray system for gas accumulation.

Upon completion of the evaluation, submit a license amendment request (LAR) to adopt the appropriate portions of Technical Specifications Task Force (TSTF)-523, by June 30, 2015. l&M letter dated September 30, 2014 (ADAMS Examination results were submitted to the NRG by Accession No. ML14275A454), contained a regulatory letter dated December 16, 2014 (ADAMS Accession commitment in response to an NRG request for No. ML14352A232).

additional information (RAI) regarding an LAR to revise the Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program. Commitment 8606 was closed appropriately.

Commitment 8606: Provide the NRG with the results of examinations related to the condition described in RAl-EMCB-1, which will be performed during Unit 1 cycle 26 refueling outage, by December 19, 2014.

Commitment No(s). and Descriptions 8607 Related to RVI AMP lower support columns TABLE 1 Audit Summary (Continued) Review Auditor's Assessment l&M letter dated October 22, 2014 (ADAMS Accession The completion date was changed to September 30, No. ML14316A449), contained a regulatory commitment 2015, due to the PWROG project being extended until in response to NRC RAI dated June 6, 2014 (ADAMS June 2015. The reason for the extension is to provide Accession No. ML14135A320), regarding the RVI AMP the lower support column report to the NRC, allow time submittal.

for review, and develop a path for utilities to apply the methodology.

Commitment 8607: l&M will continue to participate in the PWROG project for lower support columns. l&M will No NRC notification of the revision was necessary, in provide a response to the NRC RAI when a accordance with PMP-2350-CMS-001.

methodology is developed by the PWROG project, by March 31, 2015. Commitment 8607 was revised appropriately.

L. Weber There is no need for the licensee to respond to this letter. The NRC staff appreciates the resources that were made available by your staff during the audit. If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2846.

Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316

Enclosure:

Audit Report cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC LPL3-1 R/F RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTR Resource RidsNrrPMDCCook Resource RidsNrrLAJBurkhardt Resource JEllegood, Riii ADAMS Accession No.: ML15203A010 Sincerely, IRA/ Allison W. Dietrich, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 111-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation RidsRgn3MailCenter Resource RidsNrrlpl3-1 Resource RidsNrrLAMHenderson Resource TTaylor, Rill TOrf, NRR OFFICE N RR/DORL/LPL3-1

/PM NRR/DORL/LPL3-1 LA NRR/DORL/LPL3-1/BC NRR/DORL/LPL3-1

/PM (JBurkhardt for) NAME ADietrich MHenderson DPelton ADietrich DATE 7/24/2015 7/22/2015 7/27/2015 7/29/2015 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY