NEI 99-04, 2020-2021 Biennial 10 CFR 50.59 and 10 CFR 72.48 Summary Reports and 2021 Commitment Revision Summary Report
| ML22083A106 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Three Mile Island  |
| Issue date: | 03/24/2022 |
| From: | Orth T Constellation Energy Generation |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NEI 99-04, TMI-22-012 | |
| Download: ML22083A106 (14) | |
Text
Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 441 S. P.O. Box 480 Middletown, PA 17057
&)5 B G 1(,
70,
0MUFO
8B 6B 1XFOHMU 5HJXOMPRU\\ &RPPLVVLRQ
$771 'RFXPHQP &RQPURO 'HVN
- MVOLQJPRQ '&
7OUHH 0LOH,VOMQG 1XFO HMU 6PMPLRQ 8QLP 5HQHZHG )MFLOLP\\ ILFHQVH 1RB '35 15& 'RFNHP 1RB
6XNMHFP %LHQQLMO &)5 B MQG &)5 B 6XPPM U\\ 5HSRUPV MQG
&RPPLPPHQP 5HYLVLRQ 6XPPMU\\ 5HSRUP
7OLV OHPPHU VXNPLPV POH %LHQQLMO &)5 B MQG &)5 B 6XPPMU\\
5HSRUPV UHTXLUHG N\\ &)5 B G MQG &)5 B G M QG POH $QQXMO
&RPPLPPHQP 5HYLVLRQ 6XPPMU\\ 5HSRUP UHTXLUHG N\\ 6(&< 1(, IRU 7OUHH 0LOH
,VOMQG 1XFOHMU 6PMPLRQ 8QLP 70, B
$PPMFOPHQP SURYLGHV M UHSRUP F RQPMLQLQJ M NULHI GHVFULSPLRQ R I MQ\\ FOMQJHV PHVPV RU H[SHULPHQPV POMP UHTXLUHG M B HYMOXMPLRQ GXULQJ POH UHSRUP LQJ SHULRGB
$PPMFOPHQP SURYLGHV M UHSRUP FRQPMLQLQJ M NULHI GHVFULSPLRQ RI MQ\\ FOMQJHV PHVPV RU H[SHULPHQPV POMP UHTXLUHG M B HYMOXMPLRQ GXULQJ POH UHSRUP LQJ SHULRGB
%MVHG RQ M UHYLHZ RI FRPPLPPHQP PUMFNLQJ GRFXPHQPMPLRQ LP OMV NHHQ GHPHUPLQHG POMP QR QHZ FRPPLPPHQP FOMQJHV ZHUH SURFHVVH G MQG LPSOHPHQPHG LQ FMOHQGMU \\ HMU B
7OHUH MUH QR QHZ UHJXOMPRU\\ FRPPL PPHQPV HVPMNOLVOHG N\\ POLV VXNPLPPMOB
6ORXOG \\RX OMYH MQ\\ TXHVPLRQV FRQFHUQLQJ POLV OHPPHU SOHMVH FR QPMFP 0UB &UMLJ : 6PLPO MP
B
5HVSHFPIXOO\\
Orth, Trevor L Digitally signed by Orth, Trevor L Date: 2022.03.24 09:33:12 -04'00'
7UHYRU IB 2UPO 6LPH 'HFRPPLVVLRQLQJ 'LUHFPRU 7OUHH 0LOH,VOMQG 1X FOHMU 6PMPLRQ 8QLP
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Biennial 10 CFR 50.59 and 10 CFR 72.48 Summary Reports Annual Commitment Revision Summary Report NRC Docket No. 50-289 March 24, 2022 Page 2
$PPMFOPHQP 70, B 6XPPMU\\ 5HSRUP
$PPMFOPHQP 70, B 6XPPMU\\ 5HSRUP
FF Z $PPMFOPHQPV 15& 5HJLRQMO $GPLQLVPUMPRU 15& 5HJLRQ,
15& 3URMHFP 0MQMJHU 1066 7OUHH 0LOH,VOMQG 8QLP
'LUHFPRU %XUHMX RI 5MGLMPLRQ 3URPHFPLRQ 3$ 'HSMUPPHQP RI (QYLURQPHQPMO 5HVRXUFHV
$PPMFOPHQP
%LHQQLMO 70, B 6XPPMU\\ 5HSRUP
2020-2021 Biennial TMI-1 50.59 Summary Report Page 1 of 2
Title:
MIS-A-2B [Fuel Handling Building Crane] RZ [Restricted Zone] Mode Application to AFHT [Auxiliary Fuel Handling Tool] Operation
Year Implemented: 2021
Evaluation Number: TMI-D-0169
Description of Activity:
The proposed Activity, Engineering Change EC 633954, evaluates and modifies programming, provides procedural requirements and provides remo te (Wi-Fi) access for the Fuel Handling Building (FHB) Crane (Component ID: MIS-A-2B). This Activity is divided for the purposes of this 50.59 Review according to the below scope items.
- 1. Evaluates, modifies programming and provides procedural requirements for the MIS-A-2B Restricted Zone (RZ) Mode to restrict lateral travel of the manual Auxiliary Fuel Handling Tool (AFHT) during operation to prevent an accident of a type different from any previously evaluated in the UFSAR (DSAR).
Lateral (horizontal) movement limits for the FHB crane during use of the AFHT were previously evaluated in a 50.59 Evaluation approved for issuanc e of procedure 1507-15, Revision 0. That 50.59 Evaluation (1507-15) describes the use of clamp-on mechanical hard stops on the crane runway rails and monorail trolley rail when the AFHT is in use, as a means to prevent an accident of a type dif ferent from any previously evaluated in the Decommissioning Safety Analysis Report (DSAR). Steps were included in procedure 1507-15 to ensure the installation of these hard stops prior to using the AFHT to handle irradiated fuel.
This Activity establishes the RZ Mode boundaries and procedural requirements for use of the MIS-A-2B RZ Mode of operation during AFHT operation to be implemented through revision of Procedure 1507-15 in place of the previously evaluated mechanical hard stops.
- 2. Authorizes permanent installation of the non-internet connected Wi-Fi router for access to the MIS-A-2B PanelView (Human Machine Interface).
Reason for Activity:
TMI-1 utilizes an AFHT to move irradiated fuel within the 'A', 'B' Spent Fuel Pools (SFP), and cask loading pit. Operation of the AFHT is controlled by procedure 1507-15, Manual Auxiliary Fuel Handling Tool Operation.
EC 625307 installed a new FHB Crane (MIS-A-2B). EC 625310 revised the DSAR to include a description of the RZ positioning control system on MIS-A-2B. M IS-A-2B is equipped with two positioning limit devices to locate the horizontal position of the cranes monorail hoist over the SFP and programming which created Restricted Zones of operation (RZ Mode). EC 625307 did not evaluate MIS-A-2B RZ Mode of operation for use with the AFHT. RZ mode of operation is desired to be deployed during use of the AFHT in accordance wit h 1507-15 instead of the
2020-2021 Biennial TMI-1 50.59 Summary Report Page 2 of 2
SUHYLRXVO\\ HYMOXMPHG B OMUG VPRSVB
7OH LQVPMOOMPLRQ RI POH QRQ LQPHUQHP FRQQHFPHG :L )L URXPHU MOO RZV UHPRPH RSHUMPRU OHYHO MFFHVV PR POH 0,6 $ % +0, MQG PR PRJJOH VHOHFP IXQFPLRQV LQFOXGLQJ 5 = 0RGH ZLPORXP SO\\VLFMOO\\
MFFHVVLQJ POH FUMQHB
Effect of Activity:
Fuel handling utilizing the AFHT suspended from the MIS-A-2B monorail hoist is different than previously evaluated by 50.59 (1507-15) for the AFHT suspended from MIS-A-2 supplemental hoist and documented in procedure 1507-15.
The modified MIS-A-2B RZ Mode in conjunction with the AFHT as implemented through the revision of procedure 1507-15 ensures that appropriate design and administrative controls are in place to control fuel handling and loading of the MAGNASTOR system using the AFHT and RZ Mode to maintain all licensing and design bases and to prevent an accident of a type different from any previously evaluated in the TMI DSAR.
The installation of the non-internet connected Wi-Fi router has no adverse effect on existing structures, systems, and components (SSC). The equipment provides capability to view pertinent information of the crane from outside the cab, and toggle select functions on the HMI.
Summary of Conclusion for the Activitys 50.59 Review:
This Activity scope can be implemented without prior NRC approval.
For Scope Item 1, The Activity changes the way in which a previous 50.59 Evaluation response to prevent an accident of a type different from any previously evaluated in the DSAR is performed or controlled and therefore a 50.59 Evaluation is required. The 50.59 Evaluation determined that the use of RZ Mode operation of MIS-A-2B with the AFHT as implemented through the revision of procedure 1507-15 does not create an accident of a type different from any previously evaluated in the TMI DSAR. All Evaluation questions are answered "NO" for this scope.
For Scope Item 2, the 50.59 Screening determined that installat ion of the non-internet connected Wi-Fi router does not adversely affect any DSAR descr ibed design function nor how it is performed or controlled. This change does not involve an evaluation nor tests or experiments not described in the DSAR. All Screening questions are answered "NO" for this scope.
As concluded in this 50.59 Review, this Activity does not require a change to the Technical Specifications or Facility License.
$PPMFOPHQP
%LHQQLMO 70, B 6XPPMU\\ 5HSRUP
2020-2021 Biennial TMI-1 72.48 Summary Report Page 1 of 8
Title:
Structural Evaluation of CC6 Vertical Concrete Cask / TMI MAGNASTOR CC6 VCC Tip-Over Analysis
Year Implemented: 2021
Evaluation Number: TMI-72.48-001.3B
Description of Activity:
Authorize use and issuance of TMI specific MAGNASTOR cask structural calculations as listed above in support of the 72.212 Evaluation Report for implementation and operation of the MAGNASTOR system at TMI-1.
Reason for Activity:
The applicable MAGNASTOR cask design for TMI-1 is the CC6 type. MAGNASTOR FSAR Chapter 3 describes structural analyses which demonstrate the CC6 cask design (among others) meets the required structural requirements for design basis normal conditions, and off-normal and accident events. The two calculations represented by this activity include analysis of (1 via 30076-2020) lower initial and aged cask concrete compressive strength values which differ from those evaluated in the MAGNASTOR FSAR, and (2 via 30076-2035) a hypothetical cask tip-over event using TMI-specific pad and soil parameters which differ from the MAGNASTOR generic parameters. These TMI-specific cases are not part of the structural evaluation presented in the MAGNASTOR Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) which has been approved by the NRC; however, they do support the TMI 72.212 re port and the 72.48 review process is thus applicable.
Effect of Activity:
The proposed activity provides design bases to support the 72.212 Evaluation Report and implementation of the MAGNASTOR system. The following analyses are included in these calculations (as labeled) and are applicable to the 72.48 review process since they are not presented in the MAGNASTOR FSAR, which has been approved by the NRC.
From calculation 30076-2020:
(1a) Appendix I of NAC Calculation 30076-2020 documents the evaluations of CC6 for the normal, off-normal, and accident conditions of storage using a compressive strength of 13,200 psi (increased from 8,000 psi considered in the FSAR) to assess the effects of aged concrete strength.
(1b) Appendix J of NAC Calculation 30076-2020 documents the evaluations of CC6 for the normal, off-normal, and accident conditions of storage using a compressive strength of 6,000 psi (reduced from 8,000 psi considered in the FSAR) to assess t he effects of low concrete strength to address nonconformance conditions during construction.
Note: Appendix K documents an evaluation which is not required to support the 72.212 Evaluation Report and is therefore not subject to review under 72.48.
2020-2021 Biennial TMI-1 72.48 Summary Report Page 2 of 8
)URP FMOFXOMPLRQ
M 7LS RYHU MQMO\\VHV LQ POH PMLQ NRG\\ RI XVLQJ POH 70, VLPH VSHFLILF FMVN SMG MQG VRLO SMUMPHPHUV
N 7LS RYHU MQMO\\VHV LQ $SSHQGL[ ( RI XVLQJ FRQFUH PH SURSHUPLHV IRU POH SMG MQG FMVN ZLPO LQFUHMVHG FRPSUHVVLYH VPUHQJPO LQFUHMVH PR MFFRX QP IRU POH HIIHFPV RI FRQFUHPH MJLQJ B
7OH GHVLJQ IXQFPLRQV RI POH 0$*1 $6725 FRQFUHPH FMVN MUH PR SURY LGH VPUXFPXUMO SURPHFPLRQ UMGLMPLRQ VOLHOGLQJ MQG LQPHUQM O MLUIORZ SMPOV POMP UHPRYH POH GHFM\\ OHMP IURP POH 7UMQVSRUPMNOH 6PRUMJH &MQLVPHU 76& VXUIMFH N\\ QMPXUMO MLU FLUFXOMPLRQB 7OH 76& SURYLGHV POH FRQILQHPHQP NRXQGMU\\ IRU POH VPRUHG IXHOB 7OH FRQFUHPH FMVN MOVR SURYLGHV S URPHFPLRQ GXULQJ VPRUMJH IRU POH 76& MJMLQVP MGYHUVH HQYLURQPHQPMO FRQGLPLRQVB
)RU,PHPV M
MQG N
POH HYMOXMPLRQ RI POH && FMVN P\\SH LV SHUIRUPHG IRU POH OLIP MQG VPRUMJH FRQGLPLRQV XVLQJ FRQFUHPH FRPSUHVVLYH VPUHQJPO RI SVL M JHG FRQFUHPH VPUHQJPO MQG SVL ORZ FRQFUHPH VPUHQJPO UHVSHFPLYHO\\ ZOLFO GLIIHUV IURP POH && FMVN FRQFUHPH FRPSUHVVLYH VPUHQJPO RI SV L XVHG LQ 0$*1$6 725 )6$5 6HFPLR Q B B 7OH HYMOXMPLRQ UHVXOPV VORZ POH FRQFUHPH FMVN PHHP POH VPUHVV UHTXLUHPHQPV RI $&, MV GHVFULNHG LQ POH 0$*1$6725 )6$5 MV XSGMPHG B +RZHYHU VLQFH FHUPMLQ FMOFXOMPHG IMFPRUV RI VMIHP\\ IRU POH FRQFUHPH FMVN HYMOXMPLRQV MUH OH VV POMQ PORVH SUHVHQPHG LQ POH FRQFUHPH FMVN HYMOXMPLRQ MV GRFXPHQPHG LQ 0$*1$6725 )6$5 6HFPLRQ B POH HYMOXMPLRQV LQ, PHPV M
MQG N
MUH FRQVLGHUHG PR OMYH MQ MGYHUVH HIIHFP RI POH GHVLJQ IXQFPLRQ RI POH 0$*1$6725 V\\VPHP MQG UHTXLUHV B (YMOXMPLRQB
)RU,PHPV M
MQG N
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
Summary of Conclusion for the Activitys 72.48 Review:
NAC calculations 30076-3020 and 30076-2035 perform structural a nalyses which demonstrate the CC6 cask design meets the required MAGNASTOR FSAR structural requirements for design basis normal conditions, and off-normal and accident eve nts. This 72.48 Evaluation has been performed for the proposed activitys adverse effects related to (1a / 1b) lower initial and aged cask concrete compressive strength values which differ from those evaluated in the MAGNASTOR FSAR (1a / 1b) and a hypothetical cask tip-over event using TMI-specific pad and soil parameters (2a / 2b). The results of these analyses demonstrate that CC6 cask meets the stress requirements of ACI 349-85 and that the calculated tip-over g-loads are below the MAGNASTOR FSAR design g-loads, respectively. Therefore, the CC6 design functions are
2020-2021 Biennial TMI-1 72.48 Summary Report Page 3 of 8
PMLQPMLQHG PR VMPLVI\\ POH 0$*1$6725 )6$5 UHTXLUHPHQPV MQG 70, B (YMOXMPLRQ 5HSRUPB
$V FRQFOXGHG LQ POLV B 5HYLHZ POHUH LV QR LPSMFP RQ 0$*1$6725 )6$5 GHVFULNHG
,QGHSHQGHQP 6SHQP )XHO 6PRUMJH,QVPMOOMPLRQ ,6)6, RSHUMPLRQV GHVLJQ NMVHV RU VMIHP\\
MQMO\\VHV MQG POHUHIRUH POHUH LV QR LPSMFP RQ POH &HUPLILFMPH R I &RPSOLMQFH &R& 7HFOQLFMO 6SHFLILFMPLRQV RU POH B UHSRUPB 7OH (YMOXMPLRQ GHPHUPLQHG POH SURSRVHG MFPLYLP\\ LV MOORZHG ZLPORXP SULRU 15& MSSURYMOB
2020-2021 Biennial TMI-1 72.48 Summary Report Page 4 of 8
Title:
TMI Site Dose Rate Analysis
Year Implemented: 2021
Evaluation Number: TMI-72.48-001.3B
Description of Activity:
Authorize use and issuance of TMI specific MAGNASTOR calculation listed above in support of the 72.212 Evaluation Report for implementation and operation of the MAGNASTOR system at TMI-1.
Reason for Activity:
The proposed activity is required to estimate the distances from the center of the TMI-1 ISFSI cask array of 46 MAGNASTOR spent fuel casks required to meet th e 10 CFR 72.104(a) dose limit of 25 mrem/yr at the controlled area boundary (and for th e nearest resident) per MAGNASTOR CoC Appendix A, Paragraph 5.5.3. The calculation repr esented by this activity includes analysis of the TMI ISFSI 4x13 cask array and site-specific controlled area boundary as well as nearest resident. These TMI-specific cases support the TMI 72.212 Evaluation Report and the 72.48 review process is thus applicable.
Effect of Activity:
The proposed activity provides design bases to support the 72.212 Evaluation Report and implementation of the MAGNASTOR system. The following analyses are included in these calculations (as labeled) and are applicable to the 72.48 review process since they are not presented in the MAGNASTOR FSAR, which has been approved by the NRC.
The design functions of the MAGNASTOR Transfer Cask (MTC) and concrete cask (CC6) include providing radiation shielding. MAGNASTOR FSAR Section 5.8.3.5 presents site boundary dose rates for a 2x10 cask array of 40 kW PWR concrete casks with a 1.75-inch thick steel liner. The TMI site-specific configuration is a 4x13 cask array with 46 CC6 type casks.
(1) As developed in the calculation, the distance measured from the center of the cask array to the 25 mrem/yr boundary on the short side or 4-cask face of the TMI array is about 435 meters, while the distance to the 'boundary' on the 2-cask face of the FSAR array is about 400 meters. The distance to the boundary (from the center of the cask array) on the long side or 13-cask face of the TMI array is about 460 meters which is within the 465 meters for the 'boundary' of the MAGNASTOR FSAR evaluation. Although the a ctual site boundary distances are all greater than those computed in the calculation and the dose at the site boundary is within the regulatory requirements, in the context of site boundary dose rate analysis the increase in the distance to the 25 mrem/year dose limit 'boundary' for the short side is considered an adverse effect and requires 72.48 Evaluation.
MAGNASTOR FSAR Section 5.5 describes that the transfer cask and concrete cask are evaluated using the MCNP three-dimensional Monte Carlo code to estimate the dose profiles at the cask surface and at distances of 1ft, 1m, 2m, a nd 4m from the cask surface.
MAGNASTOR Section 5.6.1.2 describes that the NAC version of the SKYSHINE-III code,
2020-2021 Biennial TMI-1 72.48 Summary Report Page 5 of 8
UHIHUUHG PR MV 1$& &$6& LV XVHG PR HYMOXMPH POH GLVPMQFH RI PO H PUHP \\HMU GRVH OLPLP NRXQGMU\\
IRU MQ MUUM\\ RI FMVNVB
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
Summary of Conclusion for the Activitys 72.48 Review:
NAC calculation 30076-5003 performs dose rate analyses which demonstrate the MTC and CC6 design meets the 10 CFR 72.104(a) dose limit of 25 mrem/yr at the controlled area boundary (and for the nearest resident). This 72.48 Evaluation has been performed for the proposed activitys adverse effects related to: (1) increase in the distance to the 25 mrem/year dose limit 'boundary' for the cask array short side, and (2) use of MCNP as a revision to the MAGNASTOR FSAR MOE for far-field dose rate analysis. The calcul ation results satisfy the regulatory requirements for dose rates per 10 CFR 72.104(a).
As concluded in this 72.48 Review, there is no impact on MAGNAS TOR FSAR described ISFSI operations, design bases or safety analyses and, therefore, there is no impact on the CoC, Technical Specifications, or the 72.212 report. The Evaluation determined the proposed activity is allowed without prior NRC approval.
2020-2021 Biennial TMI-1 72.48 Summary Report Page 6 of 8
Title:
TMI MAGNASTOR Transfer Cask Steady State Thermal Evaluation / T MI Transfer Cask and PWR Canister Transient Analysis / Structural Evaluation of Canister for 150-psig Off-normal Internal Pressure for Air Transfer Condition
Year Implemented: 2021
Evaluation Number: TMI-72.48-001.4B
Description of Activity:
Authorize use and issuance of TMI specific MAGNASTOR thermal/structural calculations as listed above in support of contingency procedures required for implementation and operation of the MAGNASTOR system at TMI-1.
Reason for Activity:
MAGNASTOR FSAR Section 4.11 describes thermal analysis performed for B&W 15 X 15 Array Fuel assemblies transferred in the stainless steel MTC and stored in type CC6 concrete casks, which is the applicable configuration for TMI-1. NAC calculations 30076-3005, 30076-3010 and 30076-2042 perform thermal and structural analyses, respectively, for off -normal / contingency conditions. Cases presented in these calculations reflect off-normal TSC transfer operations and contingency configurations not presented in the MAGNASTOR FSAR, which has been approved by the NRC, for which the 72.48 review process is applicable.
Analyses of these TMI-specific cases is applied to the FSAR cases, and support TMI /
MAGNASTOR operation contingency procedures.
Effect of Activity:
The proposed activity provides design bases for contingency procedures that may be used during MAGNASTOR operations. The following analyses are included in these calculations (as labeled) and are applicable to the 72.48 review process since they are not presented in the MAGNASTOR FSAR, which has been approved by the NRC.
Transfer condition thermal analyses, including related maximum temperatures, are given in MAGNASTOR FSAR Section 4.11. Transfer conditions include four operational phases associated with loading, processing, and transferring the canister into the storage overpack: (1) the water phase, (2) vacuum drying phase, (3) cooling/helium phase, and (4) air transfer phase.
(a) Thermal analyses for transfer conditions using R-ACWS (Downflow) - alternate to normal Auxiliary Circulating Water System (ACWS) (or up-flow):
x R-ACWS with 70°F water temperature and a flow rate of 40 GPM (Appendix E of 30076-3005).
x R-ACWS with 100°F water temperature and a flow rate of 60 GPM (Appendix F of 30076-3005, Appendices K, L and N of 30076-3010) Note that this is th e bounding case.
(b) Thermal analyses for thermal contingency events:
x Transient analysis for water phase without ACWS (Appendix G of 30076-3005) x Transient analyses for 4.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> of ACWS Loss during vacuum drying phase (Appendices
2020-2021 Biennial TMI-1 72.48 Summary Report Page 7 of 8
( ) I 4 RI B x Steady state analysis for air transfer phase with indefinite ti me (Appendix J of 30076-3010).
x Thermal analyses for TSC backfilled with Nitrogen (Appendices H, I of 30076-3005 and Appendices M, P of 30076-3010).
x Transient analysis for additional cooling of TSC after transfer phase (Appendix S of 30076-3010).
(c) Structural analysis for 'air transfer with indefinite time' contingency event (30076-2042):
The R-ACWS used in the transfer conditions as described in Item 'a' provides a similar cooling function as the ACWS described in the MAGNASTOR FSAR Section 4.11 (as updated). The difference in the calculated maximum fuel tempera tures for the transfer conditions is insignificant between the evaluations for ACWS (100°F water and 40 GPM) and R-ACWS (100°F water and 60 GPM). As discussed in Secti on K1 in Appendix K of 30076-3010, the difference is 2°F in the maximum fuel temperatures (maintaining a margin of approximately 130°F to the temperature limit of 752°F) for the bounding case for the vacuum drying phase. Therefore, the use o f R-ACWS as an alternative for TSC cooling has an insignificant effect on the design function of the MTC.
The thermal analyses for the thermal contingency events for the transfer conditions described in Item 'b' indicate that the system component temperatures are within the allowable temperature limits. For the water phase without ACWS, the calculated maximum water temperature remains below the boiling temperature of water at 19 hours2.199074e-4 days <br />0.00528 hours <br />3.141534e-5 weeks <br />7.2295e-6 months <br />. Based on the thermal analyses for other thermal contingency events in Item 'b',
the calculated maximum fuel cladding temperatures are higher than the maximum fuel cladding temperatures for the regular transfer conditions as presented in FSAR Section 4.11 (as updated) but remain well below the temperature limit of 752°F which supports the conclusion that the MTC cooling design function is maintained. However, the temperature increases for the thermal contingency events ar e considered an adverse effect to the design function of the MTC and requires 7 2.48 Evaluation.
Item 'c' presents a TSC evaluation for off-normal condition using a conservative internal pressure of 150 psig. This pressure is higher than the internal pressure of 130 psig used in the evaluation of the TSC evaluation for off-normal condition as described in FSAR Section 3.6.1 (as updated). This analysis results show that the calculated TSC stresses satisfy the stress criteria per ASME Code,Section III, Subsection NB as specified in FSAR Section.
3.1.3 (as updated) which support the conclusion that the TSC containment function is maintained. However, the calculated TSC stresses are higher than those presented in FSAR Section 3.6.1 and is considered an adverse effect to the design function of the TSC and requires 72.48 Evaluation.
Summary of Conclusion for the Activitys 72.48 Review:
NAC calculations 30076-3005, 30076-3010 and 30076-2042 perform thermal and structural analyses, respectively, for off-normal / contingency conditions. This 72.48 Evaluation has been
2020-2021 Biennial TMI-1 72.48 Summary Report Page 8 of 8
performed for the proposed activitys adverse effects related to: (1) maximum fuel cladding temperature increases, and (2) TSC internal pressure increases. The results of these thermal analyses, including those for other off-normal/contingency cases, show that the maximum fuel cladding temperature remains well below the fuel thermal limit, and thus the design function of the MTC for TSC cooling is met. The associated TSC structural a nalysis for off-normal air transfer phase using internal TSC pressure of 150 psig shows TSC physical integrity is maintained per FSAR requirements.
As concluded in this 72.48 Review, there is no impact on MAGNASTOR FSAR described ISFSI operations, design bases or safety analyses, and therefore there is no impact on the CoC, Technical Specifications, or the 72.212 report. The Evaluation determined the proposed activity is allowed without prior NRC approval.