ML13211A258

SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 2.0, Vogtle Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 3 of 14

ML13211A258
Person / Time
Site:	Vogtle
Issue date:	07/25/2013
From:	Southern Co, Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-13-1236 SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver 2.0
Download: ML13211A258 (76)

Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCVO61-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Status:C)

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo.

2- I' Z-1 Equip. Class'2 z I Equipment Description , sf-Location:

Bldg. ' Floor El. Z2-W Room, Area -'z vc3 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

NU NCE 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y rd NEI UC N/A-YV NO UC"] N/A-Y*ON UC N/A[: Y NEI Ul- N/A-Y', NO UO 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 PAGE 50 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. -I- \-L-- C,0 ( Equip. Class" 2 2.1 Equipment Description A. cc- -j Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?UE- N/A[-Y NE] U['- N/A-1 Y NE-- UDI N/AD-Y4 N[] U--Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could N] UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

/-Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: & 'ý i I~ -\ '1'j4~-Date: c 1--2_OtZ 69 L9 Z-.4 C-4 )PAGE 51 of 433 4 ACHMENT 3 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION PAGE 52 of 433 ATACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIO *N 2.0 PAGE 53 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-I3Z-P-P-

00. Equip. Class" 2 Equipment Description 4FIV p&J*.t1 HS Ov tJr.-el, Location:

Bldg. Ay F Floor El. Room, Area Ao )Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Pk) 7/6o 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YIW"N" UD N/A[D YM/N[-" U1" N/AD-YN- UDl-D N/AD YION- UD N/AD Y$ /NN] Ur Enter the e:quipment class name from Appendix 8: Clastses of Equipment.

PAGE 54 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-/3 o 2-Pf+"0oa Equip. Class 1 2 Equipment Description 4A-J -o-s, Af ,,A- Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YlE"NE] UE" N/AE".4t/$d5-0.

, J8.3 AreZ overheadý eqimndsrbto ytms eln'ie ihig Awn-i ri:( 4.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yg/-l U-tC N/ACl Y[3/N- UtI- N/AC Y0"/NE] U Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yg" N"' U[IC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) jj" Evaluated by:_A 4k Z Date:< C-4 )PAGE 55 of 433

,ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIO*PAGE 56 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- 13eZ. -', -,o/ Equip. Class" 2 Equipment Description C-,,, 1/,-n ..r e 7'r -t 77,,. k , ./Location:

Bldg. C.T'rA4.I Floor El. 2-2..' Room, Area Y-4 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of'judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[EN" of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YEj3 NO~ UEJ NIAE YEý NO? UL N/AIJ.22 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yt~ No? UE N/AE?Y NEI UE? N/AE?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y0 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<- C.3 >PAGE 57 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. /LoZ j,-. / Equip. Class" 2 /Equipment Description ad ..,/'te 4-1"tar, .,!a,. Z Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Cove,- k a-.*k.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YýNO" UD N/AD YD ND UD N/Acr"/Y&Y{I" UD N/AD YE</NO UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yb"/N- UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 7"/e t ,; Cc,-4-,..f Sel /4 ,,-,.c,, 4-. re ,. ti -, of CcreIkc A,-jr &9 "rf dft p,, a. a-r frh I sA~r:& -f /M ccr*k Evaluated by: k;rjit Y4&1-C Date: W ? 11L< C-4 PAGE 58 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 59 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 60 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 61 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:6 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. .2-Equip. Class" IX -Equipment Description S&6 ISOI. ,1eM,`J .A(k Location:

Bldg. ______ Floor El. IWO " Room,Area -P 130 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) tP411t't(.1tU -C 6tl (1470JLS Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration yefification is required.)7Affi{6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yo NO UO N/AO YP NEI UO N/AC Yý N -U- N/An Yý NO UO N/A]YI NEI IU[-]Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >.PAGE 62 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentLDNo.

"2.

Equip. Class'2 T 9.,k)Equipment Description 6 (rS [:-'ol. Sof[not G ýInteraction Effects 7. Are sofl targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y NE U- N/AC"I 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NC U[] N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX NC UC N/A-Y NC UC Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NC UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: ". " ( " /JA 5 c,,,. ,_Date: " I,- 2&-a.-< C--4 >PAGE 63 of 433 AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.111P)223 PAGE 64 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 65 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status' N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- /:5'V0-4.6-fCi'quip.

Class"-0 Equipment Description

/'/V4C P^ A/ICZL Location:

Bldg. eyAa"?o.1-Floor El. 220 / Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora~e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YP NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

21-< IFlq go / -ojzz7,, ke .-1. a 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YP4 NE UD N/AD Y4 NEI U- N/ADNE UD N/AJ,, Yg NE UD N/AED Yrvf NEI UD3 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >, PAGE 66 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z-/5 00 -Z2 5/ -lA/ quip. Class" 2 Equipment Description

/-/v,, C P,4NeL.: Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?-YXND UI- N/A-8. Are overheadequipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YD ND Ur N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX NO UD- N/AD YX NDI UO Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could ND UD--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

//,i',/v 6 Evaluated by: mA2?- .( vw't" Y,'ot-#4,3 Date: f --- -0/z 2.-A-1 01 ( C-4>PAGE 67 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 68 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 i C PAGE 69 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status.Y)

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- 1 W3 -0a7- oo% Equip. Class': in ,~- 2-4//AL Equipment Description CO-tL W') C -'Y'. 2') ~ 4l - V Location:

Bldg. Co-t-wo% Floor El. 2'6-O" Room, Area FZ '6 k Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) rrLc/-oL ,r Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgrnents and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO] N[of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismiiic conditions?

YV NE] UIE- N/AE]I NE UE] N/AE Y\ NE] UE] N/AE"]YE] NEI UE] N/A$YklN[E] UE Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 )PAGE 70 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

2-1531 Equip. Class" 2 I 4 [AiJtir Equipment Description Cc-'-tlhJ (OL' L Interaction Effects *7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

IýNNO U" N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NEI U' N/A[-I and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yý NOI UO N/AO Ylý NEI UO Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YV NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

'S 13 7. c_00_.k/ 5 tVc f L- Date: 29-- f~-Evaluated by:< C-4>PAGE 71 of 433

• ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 72 of 433

• ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 08282012 PAGE 73 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: & N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z- /5539-7-40/'

Class' /A8 Equipment Description C'0 ,S, '/W fv/C a/-VI7/Location:

Bldg. &91T"rOoL FloorEl. Z90_/ Room, Area ,.4/Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

.-4,eq~ " '-76, Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YX NDI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X NE-" U" N/ADI YK ND- U-' N/A[D YX NDI U"] N/AD Y4NEI UD- N/ADl YM NEIUD]12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >PAGE 74 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of"2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.,-/? 3 o4 7- 00f- 000 Equip. Class 12/8 Equipment Description C6 1 o6 RA-t i" 4/c 117/Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?tXNDI UD N/AO Y;K NDI UI N/AD Y;< NDI U- N/AD YNO UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y)4 NDI U(D adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluatedby: , !1 O9,9-/YDate:S/

A~i .17!" &-'X Aai4Qý W1 16 Awn 12 7/2012-< C.4>PAGE 75 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.10 PAGE 76 of 433 3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 77 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:jzU Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. ,- I54'#O.-V7-OOJ.OOEquip.

Class'1 2 9 -FAN,'Equipment Description .t.tt-It T oxe it Et, ."'W Yx-44,r r" 4T- 'Location:

Bldg. Ty,,,.L. FloorEl. -Z-2-, Room, Area PP,,67",,-,,vFL 7."1Z.A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] N)Q of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YE] No U-1 N/A[-YEI NX U[] N/A[]4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[-] NA U-1 N/A 6"U4 LUO 0V% ý.Wq. QAo't0 1065 CW4v.q. 1-UL CGV4ýIa 5 1 Ujaj" AcCr"A it 4~e pil.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant ocume'ntation?

YEI NEI UE N/A (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

C3 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YX NEI UC 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

-<C-3 >PAGE 78 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. -S'L-3O.7-O2-DOC Equip. Class'Equipment Description Lt-7) I...,,viJr

-A -1 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YX NO U- N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NE UI] N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

/-9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX NEI UQ N/AD I NO UO Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NEI U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

1-Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

C~.Q ~I44 Evaluated by: Date: 9_ -_5"_ _ _6/< C-4 >PAGE 79 of 433

• ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 80 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOR PAGE 81 of 433 40ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 9 C 3 INO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 9 PAGE 82 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-/55F747-05 -OOOEquip.

Classn 4//? /',q .69 -C-4, Equipment Description g!FZ4W 5L"- ,,6 A/b AA1'=C IfOOVAI" /1 Location:

Bldg. 4YA.. FloorEl. 17.9 3 f-f Room, Area /?,0O0 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

,41WeRfc'eAW

,9I'R --',R , q',fA ,,feV Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ N-]of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y NE-] UE] N/AE]NE] UE N/AE]YlQ' NE] UE] N/AE]I VY, NE] UE N/AO Y N] U-]2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >PAGE 83 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID Equip. Class' /0 A4'1 9 Pniiinm~nt fl~~crintion Et~C!qw,v6A .4,vp 1we" 9,v~ir 49v- 4 EniiinmentDescTintion jF445C Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y NEI UQ N/A[I 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YX NE U0 N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX NEI UEl N/ADI Y NEI UD3 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

INO Um Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: W W~At,~ 'lmAv4L tWj/tn'~3 Date:gr ~tI<C-4 )-PAGE 84 of 433 4ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 85 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 71 PAGE 86 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIO*2-IL 4"" Now ,rff 0.".Pr55 47- -OPAGE 87 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION P 08292012 PAGE 88 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Is NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 89 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: 00 U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Zi- r;'(6, o/°6'uip.

Class" 2 /0 4-Ar Equipment Description

/ ,2-AJ(,, P,'rA-r'f OP4f AjF.-r'A--"pM AJo mriiT" Location:

Bldg. A(.... Floor El. 7-Yf('O" Room, Area C1- Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

A 4 Ah" f If.t Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one )g NE]of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yý NDI UE- N/AD YV NDI UE- N/A-'4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YX NDI UI' N/AD-If-) --k~ G:ý2(:&0 C)J 'TV;' C:X %'~(.~'5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y, NDI UD- N/A[D (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Oro.aJ : ZU-o10 1-z7,f-.6) 1-z.0o1-A,/st, -6.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

to, ND uDl 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >PAGE 90 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- S '--0 Equip. Class"1 A'-. 10 Equipment Description " 'J l .A --sT L--t Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yp NCI UCI N/AC 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y" NC] UC- N/A-1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YXJ NC' UC N/A (N/AD 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YX NCI UIC of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NCI UF1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

/Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) (C- 0--c'c 4> ctii: -~)'S i ~ -T,2L; Cý_ Z CQ : 0" ii.'0 C- c` L C- ~ '-4-. LZ 4 1 Evaluated by: ý, )/ -> VDou4 athet A, 7 1'Qb4-.P5A^4 Date: c4_ &)v.0161V/Z/PAGE 91 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIO*PAGE 92 of 433

1. ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIO*PAGE 93 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 S t1of 2 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo. ic5-ZC7-00i Equip. Class'2 /1 -h2//5 Equipment Description ( 3 -C 'A \Lq. t3 Location:

Bldg. o-'- FloorEl. 2c,,c'-o" Room, Area 6 1,0 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

,.A!ZA f + : -1 ý .11 t1 o0;'3: Cc.' /-,I T-. ! ,Z g V.'c,.(, q"ed;6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YWNE- UO N/AO YE/N- U- N/A-Y[N-- LUID N/AR YPJ NEI UO N/AC/NC-IUC-'2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

4 C-3 >PAGE 94 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

2 -c'12 -C7-o0t Equip. Class" 2 [( " Equipment Description r'-ý i V Q \ Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YMNr"[ UO N/AQ YZNEI U[3- N/AD YdNI--I UO N/AO Y['N- U[-Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y4' NO U" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

/V9 It ., Evaluated by: VA.Date: /)c ,'z t 2f.4 t 4 C-4 >" PAGE 95 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Is NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 08302012 PAGE 96 of 433 3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Iý4 I PAGE 97 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 b67 1 of 2 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z- i59Z -tP7 -ot Equip. Class 1 2 -/4 0 ,J-,1 e&,A.16 Equipment Description IrS- C\,\.t)- tJ.t-(? t-',>?Location:

Bldg. '-' .FloorEl. 26,&-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

GOUL'ZS P'.)'-t P->, (IJ C-Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YJZ bK-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

• k , Z //2-2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applics if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

YiN]E UE- N/AQ-WN UEn N/AEJ YVN[-] Urn N/AE]Y[2"N[- UI- N/A0 x zOiiA3 ,z j i /,/-6q~ tzo'?, ,4C.. 'z'6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y["'NEI Ur1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

n Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 )PAGE 98 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-15412__77-_

01 Equip. Class" 2 f "

Pomvp Equipment Description

=-

v P Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y9f NEI UD N/AD YV/N- U- N/AD YlN[-] UD N/AD]YIND UFJ Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YV/N[-] U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

ý,7Z [ 59-Z -C-7 -C~ck t --..'._ Evaluated by: 4. 1 / I kA -4i 7 f , Date: 4 PAGE 99 of 433 AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION f2 PAGE 100 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:< )N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlD No. Z-(7T9Z -77.-rO / Equip. Class 1 2 "7..(L a4 --6 4 5 Equipment Description CSSw--,*4-6 F-PA*0 .zN u 7T-4./Location:

Bldg. 6o/i,,1r,-

FloorEl. z-d' " Room, Area f93/0 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) t 0 E 1l envJ £ r,, Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y[E//NE] UE" N/AD Y[' NE] UE- N/AE-Y[;/N,-] UO N/A[-Y'NEI UEn N/AEC O ? ,h k ~ ~ tj v A y, , 3} 0 .0 IlA 0 .-5 7; 3 , ~ r i ý , , A, x 2 P lt -ý U 0 , -' z ." , 7 x,4t t I C c -6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

n Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >PAGE 101 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment DeNo. 7-/15?7- -r7- -,' Equip.Class'1 2.---k. J "/k-,/ EycA-C4,', E/-3 V7 Equipment Description

£65SAIX eJ7AL Xj-tEO W-tTTz( *fxM44¶ryos rAAj Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE(/N-] U- N/AD Yd"ND U-- N/AD YE"'N UO N/AD YEO NO U'Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YF' NEI U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: C' a- Y- " Date: ý' 23.Z)/--.~-,I *:.,'< C-4 >'PAGE 102 of 433 4ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0~log ,°PAGE 103 of 433 9 ACH-ENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIO*32012 PAGE 104 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: Y 0 U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-/6Pf -4"-PC/ Equip. Class': 2o,~A'srdq.

$eZ,'VTAOI

,',q'v~es Equipment Description

/ O 5 / ff- C 1"o r71C-T /Location:

Bldg.4',A/TRO4-FloorEl. Z20f Room, Area 1q16 *Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

YX NEI U- N/AEI-Y( NO UE N/Al YEI N UE N/AO XI]N I.I- /[]cc~q',,4 e ,e l s.<e-rcy , A e cq .XZCKI~oZ

• 0 7.o03C .Aev/, ./oi a o P7" (51fAit'.JV oA/6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE- N)U potentially adverse seismic conditfinni 9 11 Enter the equipm'PAGE 105 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. /-/1644- f-PC/ Equip. Class 1 2 ZO Equipment Description

/"oCe: r,; / A C ,eo 7-cr-7 /Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YA NO U- N/A-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YX NEI UC N/A-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?P V 91i-1/-L Y;K~ ~UO N/AC YX NEI UC Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YK NC UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

~4P " T,'Ee 71S Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Es,", , "4*../'.-3 SE& 2-/l-m v5--HV Evaluated by:.Date: 5/t-.o/ Z0/4 C-4l >PAGE 106 of 433 3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 107 of 433 9 TTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Is NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 108 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOV 020O9 PAGE 109 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.01*PAGE 110 of 433 9 TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0V-. 1 7 7 ' " PAGE 111 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:/ 0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-I 004- 5"-.SI Equip. Class" 20 ( £ Pc rtt Equipment Description PrOCE.5 T '-C P/bf'k I Location:

Bldg. COIII"TO Floor El. 22-O. Room, Area P-/0-Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) kkjh )WL4,f Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YCN 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?UC N/AC Yfý'NO UC' N/AC]YC] NEI U-] N/A[YCI NC] UC3 N/AO YO(NE3 UCJ Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.( C-3 >PAGE 112 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. _-___c__-__-

Equip. Class" 2 20 -z t. / -eA, ,4-. ./Equipment Description

/'RoC-. 1 ,0eyrG--r

/Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y;1 NDl UD- N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NI U[3 N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

/.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Y) NED UD- N/AD 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y0 Nr- UD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo NDI U'-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

2" &4' IA/5 T-5 O/,f BoT7-kf 6/D E5 f4./c-p)A teC'r4B 1.6 Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

$ !Fd -f50o -a5s- /vC F-oR k?-RE,, / Y Evaluatedby:

-Date: PAGE 113 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 mmm_ ý --ýft '01, Ift % if,%PAGE 114 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:(9 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

2/605dg 1 4S1 Equip.Class 2 Equipment Description A rCe-Rf&19rE XHAr AoOQ11 IN/D. A44'-e 2/ C,,.8 Location:

Bldg./ Floor El. 2,.0 Room, Area ;' IZ z rd.-Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraze I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NX of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y'W NO UO N/AO YJW NO UIJ N/AO YX NO UO N/AO YD NO UQ N/As YX NO UO 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix 1: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >.PAGE 115 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-1(0,- C6- 45' Equip. Class'" (i,4ewT (oM,*r, P.t/EL)Equipment Description

/4-5Hzrrj9. V'K'M /MI ,E4e,"16" Z/ e-4,, Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y; NO UD N/AD Y10 NO UF- N/AD YX NO UD N/AD YX NEI U0 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YJR NDI UD'adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: 4Date: P lzo/,~~f44~~i ~JJ&:risop 1 I 1Z 1 201Z.< C-4 >PAGE 116 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0-PAGE 117 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0'I .J .J N N PAGE 118 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 4 4 -a 4 -j PAGE 119 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No. Z4/6o5-P5'f-SA Equip. Class" 2 2 0

/r 4" ('7*"Z A#ApAWEC)Equipment Description 5"MUPOn / m 1 A/E,, I 7"4/N ,, Location:

Bldg. dONrgvR- FloorEl. ZOO' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YX3 NE3 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Y;R NEI UE N/AE YXI NEI U- N/AE 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxiaUo+/-UU5 AlMolt f/*j '#'9 ig 1' 2"#1./ 41 ,s OF rA/',01 (1,16 $/0) ,47" r$elP 7-,e 3-, &,+ y'mona /CfvT 4. Tls achorage free of vis-il 4racks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NE UEr N/AJp j, vet-or cv Acr, C To sT-,io4eL 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)/- 00c -14/ v6, /. 7.0 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YJA NE UE1 N/AE YIq NEI ULI Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

4 C-3>PAGE 120 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.

SD"D4 Equip. Class 2 ;Zo Equipment Description S-'7-'OU/M,0 " p, E- TQM,4¢Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YK NEI U- N/AD YX NO U- N/AD Y% NO UD N/A-Y$5 U Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could \) NO UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: A!"- r7 1// te: g 2 0/1..t 1 "< C-4 >-PAGE 121 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS is NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 122 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOI`*PAGE 123 of 433 V ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.10 PAGE 124 of 433 ATACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 125 of 433