ML18151A295: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 34: Line 34:
ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT The Annual Radiological Effluent Release Report describes the radiological effluent control program conducted at the Surry Power station during the 1994 calendar year. This document summarizes the quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents and solid waste released from the Surry Power Station in accordance with R. G. 1.21 and includes an assessment of radiation doses to the maximum exposed member of the public due to radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents.
ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT The Annual Radiological Effluent Release Report describes the radiological effluent control program conducted at the Surry Power station during the 1994 calendar year. This document summarizes the quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents and solid waste released from the Surry Power Station in accordance with R. G. 1.21 and includes an assessment of radiation doses to the maximum exposed member of the public due to radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents.
There were no unplanned liquid or gaseous effluent releases classified according to the criteria in the Offsite Dose calculation Manual during this reporting period. Based on the 1994 effluent calculations were performed in Calculation Manual. The results indicate the following:
There were no unplanned liquid or gaseous effluent releases classified according to the criteria in the Offsite Dose calculation Manual during this reporting period. Based on the 1994 effluent calculations were performed in Calculation Manual. The results indicate the following:
release data, Appendix I dose accordance with the Offsite Dose of these pathway dose calculations  
release data, Appendix I dose accordance with the Offsite Dose of these pathway dose calculations
: 1. The total body dose due to liquid effluents was 5.99E-04 mrem, which is 9. 98E-03% of the dose limit and the critical organ (GI-LLI) dose due to liquid effluents was 7.89E-04 mrem, which is 3.95E-03%
: 1. The total body dose due to liquid effluents was 5.99E-04 mrem, which is 9. 98E-03% of the dose limit and the critical organ (GI-LLI) dose due to liquid effluents was 7.89E-04 mrem, which is 3.95E-03%
of the dose limit
of the dose limit
Line 42: Line 42:
Based on the levels of radioactivity observed during this reporting period and the dose calculations performed, the operations of the Surry Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2, have resulted in negligible radiation dose consequences to the maximum exposed member of the public in unrestricted areas . 1   
Based on the levels of radioactivity observed during this reporting period and the dose calculations performed, the operations of the Surry Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2, have resulted in negligible radiation dose consequences to the maximum exposed member of the public in unrestricted areas . 1   
* *
* *
* Purpose and Scope The Radioactive Effluent Release Report includes a summary of the quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents and solid waste as outlined in Regulatory Guide 1.21, "Measuring, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactivity in Solid Wastes and Releases of Radioactive Materials in Liquid and Gaseous Effluents from Water-cooled Nuclear Power Plants", Revision 1, June 1974, with data summarized on a quarterly basis following the format of Tables 1, 2 and 3 of Appendix B thereof. The report includes an assessment of radiation doses to the maximum exposed member of the public due to radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents released from the site during the previous calendar year. Additionally a list of unplanned releases during the reporting period is included in Attachment  
* Purpose and Scope The Radioactive Effluent Release Report includes a summary of the quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents and solid waste as outlined in Regulatory Guide 1.21, "Measuring, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactivity in Solid Wastes and Releases of Radioactive Materials in Liquid and Gaseous Effluents from Water-cooled Nuclear Power Plants", Revision 1, June 1974, with data summarized on a quarterly basis following the format of Tables 1, 2 and 3 of Appendix B thereof. The report includes an assessment of radiation doses to the maximum exposed member of the public due to radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents released from the site during the previous calendar year. Additionally a list of unplanned releases during the reporting period is included in Attachment
: 6. As required by Technical Specification  
: 6. As required by Technical Specification
: 6. 8. B, changes to the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) for the time period covered by this report are included in Attachment  
: 6. 8. B, changes to the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) for the time period covered by this report are included in Attachment
: 3. Major changes to the radioactive liquid, gaseous and solid waste treatment systems are reported in Attachment 4, as required by the ODCM, Section 6.7.2. If changes are made to these systems, the report shall include information to support the reason for the change and a summary of the lOCFRS0.59 evaluation.
: 3. Major changes to the radioactive liquid, gaseous and solid waste treatment systems are reported in Attachment 4, as required by the ODCM, Section 6.7.2. If changes are made to these systems, the report shall include information to support the reason for the change and a summary of the lOCFRS0.59 evaluation.
In lieu of reporting major changes in this report, major changes to the radioactive waste treatment systems may be submitted as part of the annual FSAR update.
In lieu of reporting major changes in this report, major changes to the radioactive waste treatment systems may be submitted as part of the annual FSAR update.
Line 56: Line 56:
The total body dose was also determined for this individual . 3   
The total body dose was also determined for this individual . 3   
* *
* *
* Presented in Attachment 6 is a list of unplanned gaseous and liquid releases as required by the ODCM, Section 6.7.2. The typical lower level of detection (LLD) capabilities of the radioactive effluent analysis instrumentation are presented in Attachment  
* Presented in Attachment 6 is a list of unplanned gaseous and liquid releases as required by the ODCM, Section 6.7.2. The typical lower level of detection (LLD) capabilities of the radioactive effluent analysis instrumentation are presented in Attachment
: 7. These LLD values are based upon conservative conditions (i.e., minimum sample volumes and maximum delay time prior to analysis) . Actual LLD values may be lower. If a radioisotope was not detected when efflu~nt samples were analyzed, then the activity of the radioisotope was reported as Not Detected (N/D) on Attachment 1 of this report. When all isotopes listed on Attachment 1 for a particular quarter and release mode are less than the lower level of detection, then the totals for this period will be designated as Not Applicable (N/A)
: 7. These LLD values are based upon conservative conditions (i.e., minimum sample volumes and maximum delay time prior to analysis) . Actual LLD values may be lower. If a radioisotope was not detected when efflu~nt samples were analyzed, then the activity of the radioisotope was reported as Not Detected (N/D) on Attachment 1 of this report. When all isotopes listed on Attachment 1 for a particular quarter and release mode are less than the lower level of detection, then the totals for this period will be designated as Not Applicable (N/A)
* 4   
* 4   
Line 66: Line 66:
* Attachment 1 EFFLUENT RELEASE DATA (January 1, 1994 Through December 31, 1994) This attachment includes a summary of the quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents and solid waste as outlined in Regulatory Guide 1.21, Appendix B .   
* Attachment 1 EFFLUENT RELEASE DATA (January 1, 1994 Through December 31, 1994) This attachment includes a summary of the quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents and solid waste as outlined in Regulatory Guide 1.21, Appendix B .   
* *
* *
* TABLE 1A EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT PERIOD 1/1/94 TO 12/31/94 GASEOUS EFFLUENT-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1&2 UNIT FIRST SECOND QUARTER QUARTER A. FISSION & ACTIVATION GASES 1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci 2.65E+02 7.llE+OO 2. A VE RELEASE RATE FOR PERIOD µ.Ci/sec 3.41E+Ol 9.0SE-01 B. IODINE 1. TOTAL 1-131 Ci 3.61E-03 1.82E-04 2. A VE RELEASE RATE FOR PERIOD µ.Ci/sec 4.64E-04 2.31E-05 C. PARTICULATE  
* TABLE 1A EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT PERIOD 1/1/94 TO 12/31/94 GASEOUS EFFLUENT-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1&2 UNIT FIRST SECOND QUARTER QUARTER A. FISSION & ACTIVATION GASES 1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci 2.65E+02 7.llE+OO 2. A VE RELEASE RATE FOR PERIOD µ.Ci/sec 3.41E+Ol 9.0SE-01 B. IODINE 1. TOTAL 1-131 Ci 3.61E-03 1.82E-04 2. A VE RELEASE RATE FOR PERIOD µ.Ci/sec 4.64E-04 2.31E-05 C. PARTICULATE
: 1. HALF-LIFE  
: 1. HALF-LIFE  
> 8 DAYS Ci 1.25E-05 1.83E-05 2. AVE RELEASE RATE FOR PERIOD µ.Ci/sec 1.61E-06 2.32E-06 3. GROSS ALPHA RADIOACTIVITY Ci O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO D. TRITIUM 1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci 4.73E+00 3.SOE+OO 2. A VE RELEASE RATE FOR PERIOD µ.Ci/sec 6.0SE-01 4.46E-Ol PERCENTAGE OF T.S. LIMITS CRITICAL ORGAN DOSE RATE % 3.35E-02 3.SOE-03 TOTAL BODY DOSE RATE % 7.32E-02 7.64E-04 SKIN DOSE RATE % 3.lOE-02 4.llE-04 Attachment 1 Page 1 of 12 % EST. ERROR l.80E+Ol 2.80E+Ol 2.80E+Ol 3.lOE+Ol   
> 8 DAYS Ci 1.25E-05 1.83E-05 2. AVE RELEASE RATE FOR PERIOD µ.Ci/sec 1.61E-06 2.32E-06 3. GROSS ALPHA RADIOACTIVITY Ci O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO D. TRITIUM 1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci 4.73E+00 3.SOE+OO 2. A VE RELEASE RATE FOR PERIOD µ.Ci/sec 6.0SE-01 4.46E-Ol PERCENTAGE OF T.S. LIMITS CRITICAL ORGAN DOSE RATE % 3.35E-02 3.SOE-03 TOTAL BODY DOSE RATE % 7.32E-02 7.64E-04 SKIN DOSE RATE % 3.lOE-02 4.llE-04 Attachment 1 Page 1 of 12 % EST. ERROR l.80E+Ol 2.80E+Ol 2.80E+Ol 3.lOE+Ol   
* *
* *
* TABLE 1A EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT PERIOD 1/1/94 TO 12/31/94 GASEOUS EFFLUENT-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1&2 UNIT THIRD FOURTH QUARTER QUARTER A. FISSION & ACTIVATION GASES 1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci 1.SlE-01 3.13E+OO 2. A VE RELEASE RATE FOR PERIOD µCi/sec 2.28E-02 3.94E-01 B. IODINE 1. TOTAL 1-131 Ci 1.43E-05 2.44E-04 2. A VE RELEASE RATE FOR PERIOD µCi/sec 1.SOE-06 3.07E-05 C. PARTICULATE  
* TABLE 1A EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT PERIOD 1/1/94 TO 12/31/94 GASEOUS EFFLUENT-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1&2 UNIT THIRD FOURTH QUARTER QUARTER A. FISSION & ACTIVATION GASES 1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci 1.SlE-01 3.13E+OO 2. A VE RELEASE RATE FOR PERIOD µCi/sec 2.28E-02 3.94E-01 B. IODINE 1. TOTAL 1-131 Ci 1.43E-05 2.44E-04 2. A VE RELEASE RATE FOR PERIOD µCi/sec 1.SOE-06 3.07E-05 C. PARTICULATE
: 1. HALF-LIFE  
: 1. HALF-LIFE  
> 8 DAYS Ci 1.SSE-04 1.26E-04 2. A VE RELEASE RATE FOR PERIOD µCi/sec 1.99E-05 1.SSE-05 3. GROSS ALPHA RADIOACTIVITY Ci O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO D. TRITIUM 1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci 3.16E+00 3.67E+OO 2. A VE RELEASE RATE FOR PERIOD µCi/sec 3.97E-01 4.62E-01 PERCENTAGE OF T.S. LIMITS CRITICAL ORGAN DOSE RATE % 1.87E-03 4.lOE-03 TOTAL BODY DOSE RATE % 3.67E-05 6.46E-05 SKIN DOSE RATE % 9.44E-06 2.16E-05 Attachment 1 Page 2 of 12 % EST. ERROR 1.SOE+Ol 2.80E+01 2.80E+01 3.lOE+Ol   
> 8 DAYS Ci 1.SSE-04 1.26E-04 2. A VE RELEASE RATE FOR PERIOD µCi/sec 1.99E-05 1.SSE-05 3. GROSS ALPHA RADIOACTIVITY Ci O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO D. TRITIUM 1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci 3.16E+00 3.67E+OO 2. A VE RELEASE RATE FOR PERIOD µCi/sec 3.97E-01 4.62E-01 PERCENTAGE OF T.S. LIMITS CRITICAL ORGAN DOSE RATE % 1.87E-03 4.lOE-03 TOTAL BODY DOSE RATE % 3.67E-05 6.46E-05 SKIN DOSE RATE % 9.44E-06 2.16E-05 Attachment 1 Page 2 of 12 % EST. ERROR 1.SOE+Ol 2.80E+01 2.80E+01 3.lOE+Ol   
Line 85: Line 85:
* TABLElC EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT PERIOD:111/94 TO 12131194 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS-GROUND LEVEL RELEASES Attachment 1 Page 6 of 12 CONTINUOUS MODE BATCH MODE SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1&2 UNIT THIRD FOURTH THIRD FOURTH QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER 1. FISSION & ACTIVATION GASES Kr-85 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Kr-85m Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Kr-87 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Kr-88 Ci NID N/D NID N/D Xe-133 Ci 9.90E-06 2.19E-02 N/D N/D Xe-135m Ci 8.33E-04 4.02E-04 NID N/D Xe-135 Ci 1.04E-03 4.97E-04 N/D N/D Xe-138 Ci NID NID NID N/D Ar-41 Ci 2.14E-03 1.77E-03 N/D N/D TOTAL FOR PERIOD Ci 4.02E-03 2.46E-02 NIA NIA 2. IODINES 1-131 Ci 1.43E-05 2.44E-04 NID 8.13E-09 1-133 Ci N/D N/D NID N/D 1-135 Ci N/D N/D NID NID TOTAL FOR PERIOD Ci 1.43E-05 2.44E-04 NIA 8.13E-09 3. PARTICULATES Sr-89 Ci NID NID NID NID Sr-90 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Cs-134 Ci NID 7.SlE-07 NID N/D Cs-137 Ci 1.14E-04 8.73E-05 N/D 1.0lE-05 Ba-140 Ci NID NID NID N/D La-140 Ci N/D N/D NID N/D Se-75 Ci N/D 4.13E-07 NID N/D Co-58 Ci 1.09E-05 N/D N/D NID Co-60 Ci 3.37E-05 2.03E-05 NID 6.SSE-06 TOTAL FOR PERIOD Ci l.59E-04 1.09E-04 NIA 1.67E-05   
* TABLElC EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT PERIOD:111/94 TO 12131194 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS-GROUND LEVEL RELEASES Attachment 1 Page 6 of 12 CONTINUOUS MODE BATCH MODE SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1&2 UNIT THIRD FOURTH THIRD FOURTH QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER 1. FISSION & ACTIVATION GASES Kr-85 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Kr-85m Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Kr-87 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Kr-88 Ci NID N/D NID N/D Xe-133 Ci 9.90E-06 2.19E-02 N/D N/D Xe-135m Ci 8.33E-04 4.02E-04 NID N/D Xe-135 Ci 1.04E-03 4.97E-04 N/D N/D Xe-138 Ci NID NID NID N/D Ar-41 Ci 2.14E-03 1.77E-03 N/D N/D TOTAL FOR PERIOD Ci 4.02E-03 2.46E-02 NIA NIA 2. IODINES 1-131 Ci 1.43E-05 2.44E-04 NID 8.13E-09 1-133 Ci N/D N/D NID N/D 1-135 Ci N/D N/D NID NID TOTAL FOR PERIOD Ci 1.43E-05 2.44E-04 NIA 8.13E-09 3. PARTICULATES Sr-89 Ci NID NID NID NID Sr-90 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Cs-134 Ci NID 7.SlE-07 NID N/D Cs-137 Ci 1.14E-04 8.73E-05 N/D 1.0lE-05 Ba-140 Ci NID NID NID N/D La-140 Ci N/D N/D NID N/D Se-75 Ci N/D 4.13E-07 NID N/D Co-58 Ci 1.09E-05 N/D N/D NID Co-60 Ci 3.37E-05 2.03E-05 NID 6.SSE-06 TOTAL FOR PERIOD Ci l.59E-04 1.09E-04 NIA 1.67E-05   
* *
* *
* TABLE2A EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT PERIOD: 1/1/94 TO 12/31/94 LIQUID EFFLUENTS-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1&2 UNIT FIRST SECOND QUARTER QUARTER A. FISSION AND ACTIVATION PRODUCTS 1. TOTAL RELEASE (NOT INCLUDING TRITIUM, GASES, ALPHA) Ci 2.48E-02 1.28E-02 2. A VE DIL. CONC. DURING PERIOD µCi/ml 6.21E-11 2.00E-11 3. PERCENT OF APPLICABLE LIMIT % 4.78E-04 1.76E-04 B. TRITIUM 1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci 1.64E+02 2.92E+02 2. A VE DIL. CONC. DURING PERIOD µCi/ml 4.09E-07 4.57E-07 3. PERCENT OF APPLICABLE LIMIT % 4.09E-03 4.57E-03 C. DISSOLVED AND ENTRAINED GASES 1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci 1.24E-06 O.OOE+OO 2. A VE DIL. CONC. DURING PERIOD µCi/ml 3.lOE-15 O.OOE+OO 3. PERCENT OF APPLICABLE LIMIT % 1.SSE-09 O.OOE+OO D. GROSS ALPHA RADIOACTIVITY  
* TABLE2A EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT PERIOD: 1/1/94 TO 12/31/94 LIQUID EFFLUENTS-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1&2 UNIT FIRST SECOND QUARTER QUARTER A. FISSION AND ACTIVATION PRODUCTS 1. TOTAL RELEASE (NOT INCLUDING TRITIUM, GASES, ALPHA) Ci 2.48E-02 1.28E-02 2. A VE DIL. CONC. DURING PERIOD µCi/ml 6.21E-11 2.00E-11 3. PERCENT OF APPLICABLE LIMIT % 4.78E-04 1.76E-04 B. TRITIUM 1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci 1.64E+02 2.92E+02 2. A VE DIL. CONC. DURING PERIOD µCi/ml 4.09E-07 4.57E-07 3. PERCENT OF APPLICABLE LIMIT % 4.09E-03 4.57E-03 C. DISSOLVED AND ENTRAINED GASES 1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci 1.24E-06 O.OOE+OO 2. A VE DIL. CONC. DURING PERIOD µCi/ml 3.lOE-15 O.OOE+OO 3. PERCENT OF APPLICABLE LIMIT % 1.SSE-09 O.OOE+OO D. GROSS ALPHA RADIOACTIVITY
: 1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO E. VOLUME OF WASTE RELEASED (PRIOR TO DILUTION)
: 1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO E. VOLUME OF WASTE RELEASED (PRIOR TO DILUTION)
LITERS 1.65E+08 1.70E+08 F. VOLUME OF DILUTION WATER USED DURING PERIOD LITERS 3.99E+ll 6.38E+ll Attachment 1 Page 7 of 12 % EST. ERROR 2.00E+Ol 2.00E+Ol 2.00E+Ol 2.00E+Ol 3.00E+OO 3.00E+OO   
LITERS 1.65E+08 1.70E+08 F. VOLUME OF DILUTION WATER USED DURING PERIOD LITERS 3.99E+ll 6.38E+ll Attachment 1 Page 7 of 12 % EST. ERROR 2.00E+Ol 2.00E+Ol 2.00E+Ol 2.00E+Ol 3.00E+OO 3.00E+OO   
* *
* *
* TABLE2A EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT PERIOD: 1/1/94 TO 12/31/94 LIQUID EFFLUENTS-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1&2 UNIT THIRD FOURTH QUARTER QUARTER A. FISSION AND ACTIVATION PRODUCTS 1. TOTAL RELEASE (NOT INCLUDING TRITIUM, GASES, ALPHA) Ci 1.32E-02 1.40E-02 2. A VE DIL. CONC. DURING PERIOD µCi/ml 1.7SE-11 2.16E-11 3. PERCENT OF APPLICABLE LIMIT % 1.58E-04 1.89E-04 B. TRITIUM 1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci 1.8SE+02 3.38E+02 2. A VE DIL. CONC. DURING PERIOD µCi/ml 2.44E-07 5.23E-07 3. PERCENT OF APPLICABLE LIMIT % 2.44E-03 5.23E-03 C. DISSOLVED AND ENTRAINED GASES 1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 2. A VE DIL. CONC. DURING PERIOD µCi/ml O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 3. PERCENT OF APPLICABLE LIMIT % O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO D. GROSS ALPHA RADIOACTIVITY  
* TABLE2A EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT PERIOD: 1/1/94 TO 12/31/94 LIQUID EFFLUENTS-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1&2 UNIT THIRD FOURTH QUARTER QUARTER A. FISSION AND ACTIVATION PRODUCTS 1. TOTAL RELEASE (NOT INCLUDING TRITIUM, GASES, ALPHA) Ci 1.32E-02 1.40E-02 2. A VE DIL. CONC. DURING PERIOD µCi/ml 1.7SE-11 2.16E-11 3. PERCENT OF APPLICABLE LIMIT % 1.58E-04 1.89E-04 B. TRITIUM 1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci 1.8SE+02 3.38E+02 2. A VE DIL. CONC. DURING PERIOD µCi/ml 2.44E-07 5.23E-07 3. PERCENT OF APPLICABLE LIMIT % 2.44E-03 5.23E-03 C. DISSOLVED AND ENTRAINED GASES 1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 2. A VE DIL. CONC. DURING PERIOD µCi/ml O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 3. PERCENT OF APPLICABLE LIMIT % O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO D. GROSS ALPHA RADIOACTIVITY
: 1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO E. VOLUME OF WASTE RELEASED (PRIOR TO DILUTION)
: 1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO E. VOLUME OF WASTE RELEASED (PRIOR TO DILUTION)
LITERS 1.71E+08 1.72E+08 F. VOLUME OF DILUTION WATER USED DURING PERIOD LITERS 7.53E+ll 6.46E+ll Attachment 1 Page 8 of 12 % EST. ERROR 2.00E+Ol 2.00E+Ol 2.00E+Ol 2.00E+Ol 3.00E+OO 3.00E+OO Attachment 1 Page 9 of 12
LITERS 1.71E+08 1.72E+08 F. VOLUME OF DILUTION WATER USED DURING PERIOD LITERS 7.53E+ll 6.46E+ll Attachment 1 Page 8 of 12 % EST. ERROR 2.00E+Ol 2.00E+Ol 2.00E+Ol 2.00E+Ol 3.00E+OO 3.00E+OO Attachment 1 Page 9 of 12
Line 153: Line 153:
* Approved by: PrQ!;;edmChangc-Scc At.m~hcd Pm: NlA Vice President-Nuclear Operations Date
* Approved by: PrQ!;;edmChangc-Scc At.m~hcd Pm: NlA Vice President-Nuclear Operations Date
* VIRGINIA POWER NORTH ANNA POWER STATION Procedure Action Request ADM21
* VIRGINIA POWER NORTH ANNA POWER STATION Procedure Action Request ADM21
* VPAP-0502 . Instructions for completin this form are included in VPAP-0502  
* VPAP-0502 . Instructions for completin this form are included in VPAP-0502
: 1. Procedure Number 2. Revision 3. Procedure Change Number VPAP-2103 5 PNl 4. Page 1 of 154 6. Expiration Date NIA 5. Procedure Title . \. Offsite Dose Calculation Manual 7. Type of Request New Procedure Procedure Change Procedure Rev is ion Procedure Deletion Vendor Procedure  
: 1. Procedure Number 2. Revision 3. Procedure Change Number VPAP-2103 5 PNl 4. Page 1 of 154 6. Expiration Date NIA 5. Procedure Title . \. Offsite Dose Calculation Manual 7. Type of Request New Procedure Procedure Change Procedure Rev is ion Procedure Deletion Vendor Procedure
: 8. Duration or Extent of Usage Permanent D Temporary D One Time Only 9. Reason For Change Incorporate response to N-94-610 and S-94-1058  
: 8. Duration or Extent of Usage Permanent D Temporary D One Time Only 9. Reason For Change Incorporate response to N-94-610 and S-94-1058
: 10. Description of Change {PN & Sl} E-Par Add information to various section for the addition of I-133. NOTE: Station Manager must sign prior to implementation.  
: 10. Description of Change {PN & Sl} E-Par Add information to various section for the addition of I-133. NOTE: Station Manager must sign prior to implementation.
: 11. Requested By Name (Please Print) C. Tarantino  
: 11. Requested By Name (Please Print) C. Tarantino
: 12. Date 5-19-94 13. If this PAR is for a deletion to an Administrative Procedure, enter the effective date of the deletion.
: 12. Date 5-19-94 13. If this PAR is for a deletion to an Administrative Procedure, enter the effective date of the deletion.
If this PAR is for a Procedure Change, the Cognizant Supervisor is not required to sign Block 15. The signature in Block 27 constitutes approval.  
If this PAR is for a Procedure Change, the Cognizant Supervisor is not required to sign Block 15. The signature in Block 27 constitutes approval.
: 15. Lead/Responsible Dept. Cognizant Supervisor  
: 15. Lead/Responsible Dept. Cognizant Supervisor
: 16. Date (Signature)  
: 16. Date (Signature)
:procedure .Changes Only -Change *of Intent Checklist (Do any of the*tollowing statements  
:procedure .Changes Only -Change *of Intent Checklist (Do any of the*tollowing statements
:applyio the-procedure change?) 17. A change to the stated Purpose of the procedure.  
:applyio the-procedure change?) 17. A change to the stated Purpose of the procedure.
: 18. A change in the stated Initial Conditions that must be satisfied prior to performing the procedure.  
: 18. A change in the stated Initial Conditions that must be satisfied prior to performing the procedure.
: 19. AchangehthestatedAcceptance Criteria that must be satisfied for satisfactory completion of the procedure.  
: 19. AchangehthestatedAcceptance Criteria that must be satisfied for satisfactory completion of the procedure.
: 20. A modification or deletion of setpoints, independent, or simultaneous verification.  
: 20. A modification or deletion of setpoints, independent, or simultaneous verification.
: 21. A change that affects specific actions that are required to be accomplished to ensure the satisfactory completion of the task. This includes changes that affect personnel safety, decrease fire protection effectiveness, affect e ui ment ualification, or involve a less conservative method of erformin the task. 22. A change that relocates or deletes a required hold point. This does not include deleting a section of a procedure which includes a hold point. 23. A change to CAUTION or WARNING statements.
: 21. A change that affects specific actions that are required to be accomplished to ensure the satisfactory completion of the task. This includes changes that affect personnel safety, decrease fire protection effectiveness, affect e ui ment ualification, or involve a less conservative method of erformin the task. 22. A change that relocates or deletes a required hold point. This does not include deleting a section of a procedure which includes a hold point. 23. A change to CAUTION or WARNING statements.
This does not include adding CAUTION or WARNING statements or deletin a section of a rocedure which includes CAUTION or WARNING statements.  
This does not include adding CAUTION or WARNING statements or deletin a section of a rocedure which includes CAUTION or WARNING statements.
: 24. A change that modifies or deletes the method for meeting a commitment identified in the procedure.  
: 24. A change that modifies or deletes the method for meeting a commitment identified in the procedure.
: 25. A change that results in a "Yes" answer to any of the questions on the PAR Activity Screening Checklist.  
: 25. A change that results in a "Yes" answer to any of the questions on the PAR Activity Screening Checklist.
: 26. D Yes Ill No D Yes Ii No D Yes fJi No D Yes a No D Yes IIJ No D Yes Id No D Yes fij No rlJ Yes D No D Yes Ill No 0Yes Iii No ,:I Procedure Action Request / ~-~: :=~ ... ;** .. _.:: .\*~_-.'~  
: 26. D Yes Ill No D Yes Ii No D Yes fJi No D Yes a No D Yes IIJ No D Yes Id No D Yes fij No rlJ Yes D No D Yes Ill No 0Yes Iii No ,:I Procedure Action Request / ~-~: :=~ ... ;** .. _.:: .\*~_-.'~  
.;: .. ... / ;.~
.;: .. ... / ;.~
Line 184: Line 184:
! ll,, n, r,v .v /,A..v. ;OCJ tt /1,tJ .t.;;e5 res,s u,1_ t',;c,,fl'rrt  
! ll,, n, r,v .v /,A..v. ;OCJ tt /1,tJ .t.;;e5 res,s u,1_ t',;c,,fl'rrt  
,~ t""'-JTS ThA-r Hl"'I-Y err~£"7" I I Tiff' ~M,.,1dol'T e;t,, 7 1..tlv()"'
,~ t""'-JTS ThA-r Hl"'I-Y err~£"7" I I Tiff' ~M,.,1dol'T e;t,, 7 1..tlv()"'
11r;;. IZfflUt:C.F.RJSO'JSS!,11(tPe.Vt2iW.Ist:ffilri . : .*. ' . 'B. 'iC.&nr*t.~mffimriitio.niniffilidHtfYP.'A.B.famni  
11r;;. IZfflUt:C.F.RJSO'JSS!,11(tPe.Vt2iW.Ist:ffilri . : .*. ' . 'B. 'iC.&nr*t.~mffimriitio.niniffilidHtfYP.'A.B.famni
:+ttm A. Does the change physically modify the facility as described in the Safety Analysis Report? Explain and D Yes fll No indicate Safety Analysis Report documents/sections reviewed.
:+ttm A. Does the change physically modify the facility as described in the Safety Analysis Report? Explain and D Yes fll No indicate Safety Analysis Report documents/sections reviewed.
P<-' jJ rtY s,,e~ ..... ;,,~"' r, ti Ar,-()JJ:;  
P<-' jJ rtY s,,e~ ..... ;,,~"' r, ti Ar,-()JJ:;  
Line 198: Line 198:
.5&deg;Tllvtrv~e  
.5&deg;Tllvtrv~e  
/uJ,:J, r,tAr,~.vS T!Mr /f/lf /Vt";""' ,f) l'.>l'te1A?t"LJ 1-e; Tift' S, A ,12, /I~ t' /Alv&11,ilr,t).  
/uJ,:J, r,tAr,~.vS T!Mr /f/lf /Vt";""' ,f) l'.>l'te1A?t"LJ 1-e; Tift' S, A ,12, /I~ t' /Alv&11,ilr,t).  
/)-~,() /rttJ,V Cr ~v~u,U /&(J,t...  
/)-~,() /rttJ,V Cr ~v~u,U /&(J,t...
(/,&,&$"~  
(/,&,&$"~  
~Uj~ l!A-t:&deg;vt:.,Ar,uu.lS  
~Uj~ l!A-t:&deg;vt:.,Ar,uu.lS
(.'.~I..,*.
(.'.~I..,*.
D. Does the change perform a test or experiment that is not described in the Safety Analysis Report? D Yes (d No Explain and indicate Safety Analysis Report documents/sedions reviewed.
D. Does the change perform a test or experiment that is not described in the Safety Analysis Report? D Yes (d No Explain and indicate Safety Analysis Report documents/sedions reviewed.
Line 208: Line 208:
E. Will operation of another system that is described in the Safety Analysis Report be adversely affecied D Yes !rl No as a result of this change? Explain and indicate Safety Analysis Report documents/sections reviewed . .I.I-.' . )\ ,JJ ,., .. .J .,,. ,r .... ~,.,... 'f!,&,&f'I'/:, 0/U t:'7,-,f',t. .S7S'rt'HS  
E. Will operation of another system that is described in the Safety Analysis Report be adversely affecied D Yes !rl No as a result of this change? Explain and indicate Safety Analysis Report documents/sections reviewed . .I.I-.' . )\ ,JJ ,., .. .J .,,. ,r .... ~,.,... 'f!,&,&f'I'/:, 0/U t:'7,-,f',t. .S7S'rt'HS  
~,, /(!l'Sv:.r  
~,, /(!l'Sv:.r  
";::-Trr,.s fl'fA...,'6C.  
";::-Trr,.s fl'fA...,'6C.
: 6. Date 8. Title Reviewer Signature  
: 6. Date 8. Title Reviewer Signature
: 10. Date Key: PAR-Procedure Action Request Form No. 730682 (July 93) (Back) : I i I 'I
: 10. Date Key: PAR-Procedure Action Request Form No. 730682 (July 93) (Back) : I i I 'I
* VIRGINIA POWER Procedure Action Request ADM21 *** VPAP-0502 Instructions for comoletin this form are included in VPAP-0502  
* VIRGINIA POWER Procedure Action Request ADM21 *** VPAP-0502 Instructions for comoletin this form are included in VPAP-0502
: 1. Procedure Number 2. Revision 3. Procedure Change Number 4. Page VPAP-2103 5 PSI 1 of 154 5. Pro~edure Title Offsite Dose Calculation Manual 6. Expiration Date NIA 7. Type of Request New Procedl.U'e Procedure Olange Procedure Revision Procedure Deletion Vendor Procedl.U'e  
: 1. Procedure Number 2. Revision 3. Procedure Change Number 4. Page VPAP-2103 5 PSI 1 of 154 5. Pro~edure Title Offsite Dose Calculation Manual 6. Expiration Date NIA 7. Type of Request New Procedl.U'e Procedure Olange Procedure Revision Procedure Deletion Vendor Procedl.U'e
: 8. Duration or Extent of Usage Permanent . 0Temporary D One Time Only 9. Reason For Change Incorporate response to N-94-610 and S-94-1058  
: 8. Duration or Extent of Usage Permanent . 0Temporary D One Time Only 9. Reason For Change Incorporate response to N-94-610 and S-94-1058
: 10. Description of Change {PN & SI} E-Par Add information to various section for the addition of IH33. ENTERED EY NOTE: Station Manager must sign prior to implementation.  
: 10. Description of Change {PN & SI} E-Par Add information to various section for the addition of IH33. ENTERED EY NOTE: Station Manager must sign prior to implementation.  
\ I *Ml 261994 t
\ I *Ml 261994 t
* WGS 11. Requested By Name (Please Print) C. Tarantino  
* WGS 11. Requested By Name (Please Print) C. Tarantino
: 12. Date 5-19-94 13. If this PAR is tor a deletion to an Administrative Procedure, enter the effective date of the deletion.
: 12. Date 5-19-94 13. If this PAR is tor a deletion to an Administrative Procedure, enter the effective date of the deletion.
If this PAR is tor a Procedure Change, the Cognizant Supervisor is not required to sign Block 15. The signature in Block 27 constitutes approval.  
If this PAR is tor a Procedure Change, the Cognizant Supervisor is not required to sign Block 15. The signature in Block 27 constitutes approval.
: 17. A change to the stated Purpose of the procedure.  
: 17. A change to the stated Purpose of the procedure.
: 15. Lead/Responsible Dept. Cognizant Supervisor  
: 15. Lead/Responsible Dept. Cognizant Supervisor
: 16. Date (Signature)  
: 16. Date (Signature)
: 18. A change in the stated Initial Conditions that must be satisfied prior to performing the procedure.
: 18. A change in the stated Initial Conditions that must be satisfied prior to performing the procedure.
1 s: AchangehthestatedAcceptance Criteria that must be satisfied tor satisfactory completion of the procedure.  
1 s: AchangehthestatedAcceptance Criteria that must be satisfied tor satisfactory completion of the procedure.
: 20. A modification or deletion of setpoints, independent, or simultaneous verification.
: 20. A modification or deletion of setpoints, independent, or simultaneous verification.
D Yes rn No 21. A change that affects specific actions that are required to be accomplished to ensure the satisfactory completion of the task. This includes changes that affect personnel safety, decrease fire protection effectiveness.
D Yes rn No 21. A change that affects specific actions that are required to be accomplished to ensure the satisfactory completion of the task. This includes changes that affect personnel safety, decrease fire protection effectiveness.
affect eQuioment aualification, or involve a less conservative method of erformin the task. 22. A change that relocates or deletes a required hold point. This does not include deleting a section of a rocedure which includes a hold coint. 23. A change to CAUTION or WARNING statements.
affect eQuioment aualification, or involve a less conservative method of erformin the task. 22. A change that relocates or deletes a required hold point. This does not include deleting a section of a rocedure which includes a hold coint. 23. A change to CAUTION or WARNING statements.
This does not include. adding CAUTION or WARNING statements or deletino a section of a rocedure which includes CAUTION or WARNING statements.  
This does not include. adding CAUTION or WARNING statements or deletino a section of a rocedure which includes CAUTION or WARNING statements.
: 24. A change that modifies or deletes the method for meeting a commitment identified in the procedure.  
: 24. A change that modifies or deletes the method for meeting a commitment identified in the procedure.
: 25. A change that results in a "Yes" answer to any of the questions on the PAR Activity Screening Checklist.  
: 25. A change that results in a "Yes" answer to any of the questions on the PAR Activity Screening Checklist.
: 26. I D Yes~ No Oves No No
: 26. I D Yes~ No Oves No No
* Procedure Action Request C. Does this adivity involve a temporary modification?
* Procedure Action Request C. Does this adivity involve a temporary modification?
Line 249: Line 249:
~" Hf f'&deg;~.e:s-.
~" Hf f'&deg;~.e:s-.
t-Jo *~ ~* ; , ~I\ -ll. S tx-1W'. , :mifl~~lf  
t-Jo *~ ~* ; , ~I\ -ll. S tx-1W'. , :mifl~~lf  
.. i&sect;'-tff;;,,,;;:,.,:;::;;;,;,j&#xa3;MltJf:----Ill]li.lJM~;11ft!im,,.1!1t;;fffJ@  
.. i&sect;'-tff;;,,,;;:,.,:;::;;;,;,j&#xa3;MltJf:----Ill]li.lJM~;11ft!im,,.1!1t;;fffJ@
: 3. Preparer Name (Please Print) y)~ tJ ~. \AO 4. Title l,{'f.S"i  
: 3. Preparer Name (Please Print) y)~ tJ ~. \AO 4. Title l,{'f.S"i  
&#xa3;, 15 5. Preparer Signature  
&#xa3;, 15 5. Preparer Signature
: 9. Reviewer Signature fl)} f)J Key: PAA*Pracedure Action Request 6. Date B. Title 10. Date NI-A Form No. 730682 (July 93) (Baclt)   
: 9. Reviewer Signature fl)} f)J Key: PAA*Pracedure Action Request 6. Date B. Title 10. Date NI-A Form No. 730682 (July 93) (Baclt)   
* * *
* * *
Line 273: Line 273:
* Changed Attachments 14 and 16 to include mark numbers for VG-RM-104 and ventilation flow rate monitors.
* Changed Attachments 14 and 16 to include mark numbers for VG-RM-104 and ventilation flow rate monitors.
Surry Power Station North Anna Power Station Apprc5vecl" :>y: I Approved by: I \ ii . 7 -,: Kt--.__
Surry Power Station North Anna Power Station Apprc5vecl" :>y: I Approved by: I \ ii . 7 -,: Kt--.__
H<~*CN ' -' '-/ rSNSq~ Chairman Date/ SNSOC Chairman Date I '-----" Al~d by, .,_ 1..L Approved by: .. ,~Qi(~* . .0/ZM~~ ~/-f,9y ' ./ V' Station Manager Date Station Manager Date Approved by: Rd= A'~ II-It -9f l. . . Vice President-Nuclear Operations Date Form No. 723758(Apr  
H<~*CN ' -' '-/ rSNSq~ Chairman Date/ SNSOC Chairman Date I '-----" Al~d by, .,_ 1..L Approved by: .. ,~Qi(~* . .0/ZM~~ ~/-f,9y ' ./ V' Station Manager Date Station Manager Date Approved by: Rd= A'~ II-It -9f l. . . Vice President-Nuclear Operations Date Form No. 723758(Apr
: 91) /
: 91) /
VIRGINIA POWER Intentionally Blank VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE2 OF 156 * * **   
VIRGINIA POWER Intentionally Blank VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE2 OF 156 * * **   
Line 338: Line 338:
* Effluent Releases at Nuclear Power Stations, U.S. NRC, September 1977 3.1.10 NUREG/CR-1276, Users Manual for the LADTAP II Program, U.S. NRC, May, 1980 3.1.11 NUREG-0597, User's Guide to GASPAR Code, U.S. NRC, June, 1980 3.1.12 Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position on Environmental Monitoring, November, 1979, Rev. 1 3.1.13 NUREG-0133, Preparation of Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications for Nuclear Power Stations, October, 1978 3.1.14 NUREG-0543, February 1980, Methods for Demonstrating LWR Compliance With the EPA Uranium Fuel Cycle Standard ( 40 CFR Part 190) 3.1.15 NUREG-0472, Standard Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications for Pressurized Water Reactors, Rev. 3, March 1982 3.1.16 Environmental Measurements Laboratory, DOE HASL 300 Manual 3.1.17 NRC Generic Letter 89-01, Implementation of Programmatic Controls for Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications (RETS) in the Administrative Controls Section of the Technical Specifications and the Relocation of Procedural Details of RETS to the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual or to the Process Control Program 3.1.18 UFSAR (Surry and North Anna) *   
* Effluent Releases at Nuclear Power Stations, U.S. NRC, September 1977 3.1.10 NUREG/CR-1276, Users Manual for the LADTAP II Program, U.S. NRC, May, 1980 3.1.11 NUREG-0597, User's Guide to GASPAR Code, U.S. NRC, June, 1980 3.1.12 Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position on Environmental Monitoring, November, 1979, Rev. 1 3.1.13 NUREG-0133, Preparation of Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications for Nuclear Power Stations, October, 1978 3.1.14 NUREG-0543, February 1980, Methods for Demonstrating LWR Compliance With the EPA Uranium Fuel Cycle Standard ( 40 CFR Part 190) 3.1.15 NUREG-0472, Standard Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications for Pressurized Water Reactors, Rev. 3, March 1982 3.1.16 Environmental Measurements Laboratory, DOE HASL 300 Manual 3.1.17 NRC Generic Letter 89-01, Implementation of Programmatic Controls for Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications (RETS) in the Administrative Controls Section of the Technical Specifications and the Relocation of Procedural Details of RETS to the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual or to the Process Control Program 3.1.18 UFSAR (Surry and North Anna) *   
* *
* *
* VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 9 OF 156 3.1.19 Nuclear Reactor Environmental Radiation Monitoring Quality Control Manual, IWL-0032-361 3.1.20 VP AP-2802, Notifications and Reports 3.1.21 NAPS Circulating Water System Modifications  
* VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 9 OF 156 3.1.19 Nuclear Reactor Environmental Radiation Monitoring Quality Control Manual, IWL-0032-361 3.1.20 VP AP-2802, Notifications and Reports 3.1.21 NAPS Circulating Water System Modifications
: a. DC-85-37-1 Unit 1 b. DC-85-38-2 lJnit 2 3.2 Commitment Documents  
: a. DC-85-37-1 Unit 1 b. DC-85-38-2 lJnit 2 3.2 Commitment Documents  


Line 398: Line 398:


===6.1 Sampling===
===6.1 Sampling===
and Monitoring Criteria 6.1.1 Surveys, sampling, and analyses shall use instruments calibrated for the type and range of radiation monitored and the type of discharge monitored.  
and Monitoring Criteria 6.1.1 Surveys, sampling, and analyses shall use instruments calibrated for the type and range of radiation monitored and the type of discharge monitored.
: 6. J .2 Installed monitoring systems shall be calibrated for the type and range of radiation or parameter monitored.
: 6. J .2 Installed monitoring systems shall be calibrated for the type and range of radiation or parameter monitored.
6.1.3 A sufficient number of survey points shall be used or samples taken to adequately assess the status of the discharge monitored.  
6.1.3 A sufficient number of survey points shall be used or samples taken to adequately assess the status of the discharge monitored.  
Line 411: Line 411:
====6.2.1 Liquid====
====6.2.1 Liquid====
Effluent Concentration Limitations a: Liquid waste concentrations discharged from the Station shall not exceed the following limits: 1. For radionuclides (other than dissolved or entrained noble gases), liquid effluent concentrations released to unrestricted areas shall not exceed ten times the effluent concentration values specified in 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2. 2. For dissolved or entrained noble gases, concentrations shall not exceed 2E-4 &#xb5;Ci/ml. b. If the concentration of liquid effluent exceeds the limits in 6.2.1.a., promptly reduce concentrations to within limits .
Effluent Concentration Limitations a: Liquid waste concentrations discharged from the Station shall not exceed the following limits: 1. For radionuclides (other than dissolved or entrained noble gases), liquid effluent concentrations released to unrestricted areas shall not exceed ten times the effluent concentration values specified in 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2. 2. For dissolved or entrained noble gases, concentrations shall not exceed 2E-4 &#xb5;Ci/ml. b. If the concentration of liquid effluent exceeds the limits in 6.2.1.a., promptly reduce concentrations to within limits .
VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 16 OF 156 6.2.1 Liquid Effluent Concentration Limitations (continued)  
VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 16 OF 156 6.2.1 Liquid Effluent Concentration Limitations (continued)
: c. Daily concentrations of radioactive materials liquid waste released to unrestricted areas shall meet the following:
: c. Daily concentrations of radioactive materials liquid waste released to unrestricted areas shall meet the following:
Volume of Waste Discharged+
Volume of Waste Discharged+
Volume of Dilution Water> 1 (l) * &#xb5;Ci/ml. -Volume of Waste Discharged x }2 ACW.1 i 1 where: &#xb5;Ci/mli = the concentration of nuclide i in the liquid effluent discharge ACWi = ten times the effluent concentration value in unrestricted areas of nuclide i, expressed as &#xb5;Ci/ml from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2 for radionuclides other than noble gases, and 2E-4 &#xb5;Ci/ml for dissolved or entrained noble gases 6.2.2 Liquid Monitoring Instrumentation  
Volume of Dilution Water> 1 (l) * &#xb5;Ci/ml. -Volume of Waste Discharged x }2 ACW.1 i 1 where: &#xb5;Ci/mli = the concentration of nuclide i in the liquid effluent discharge ACWi = ten times the effluent concentration value in unrestricted areas of nuclide i, expressed as &#xb5;Ci/ml from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2 for radionuclides other than noble gases, and 2E-4 &#xb5;Ci/ml for dissolved or entrained noble gases 6.2.2 Liquid Monitoring Instrumentation
: a. Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown on Attachments 1 and 2, Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation, shall be operable with their alarm/trip setpoints set to ensure that 6.2.1.a. limits are not exceeded.  
: a. Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown on Attachments 1 and 2, Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation, shall be operable with their alarm/trip setpoints set to ensure that 6.2.1.a. limits are not exceeded.
: 1. Alarm/trip setpoints of these channels shall be determined and adjusted in accordance with 6.2.2.d., Setpoint Calculation.  
: 1. Alarm/trip setpoints of these channels shall be determined and adjusted in accordance with 6.2.2.d., Setpoint Calculation.
: 2. If a radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel alarm/trip setpoint is less conservative than required by 6.2.2.a., perform one of the following:
: 2. If a radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel alarm/trip setpoint is less conservative than required by 6.2.2.a., perform one of the following:
* Promptly suspend release of radioactive liquid effluents monitored by the affected channel
* Promptly suspend release of radioactive liquid effluents monitored by the affected channel
Line 423: Line 423:
* VIRGINIA VPAP-2103 POWER REVISION 6 PAGE 17 OF 156
* VIRGINIA VPAP-2103 POWER REVISION 6 PAGE 17 OF 156
* b. Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Operability  
* b. Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Operability  
* ** Each radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated operable by performing a Channel Check, Source Check, Channel Calibration, and Channel Functional Test at the frequencies shown in Attachments 3 and 4, Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Surveillance Requirements.  
* ** Each radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated operable by performing a Channel Check, Source Check, Channel Calibration, and Channel Functional Test at the frequencies shown in Attachments 3 and 4, Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Surveillance Requirements.
: 1. If the number.of operable channels is less than the minimum required by the tables in Attachment 1 or 2, perform the action shown in those tables. 2. Attempt to return the instruments to operable status within 30 days. If unsuccessful, explain in the next Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report why the inoperability was not corrected in a timely manner. c. Appli~able Monitors Liquid effluent monitors for which alarm/trip setpoints shall be determined are: Release Point Instrument Number North Anna Surry Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line 1-LW-RM-111 NIA* Service Water Sys~em Effluent Line l-SW-RM-108 l-SW-RM-107 A, B,C,D Condenser Circulating Water Line l-SW-RM-130 l-SW-RM-120 2-SW-RM-230 2-SW-RM-220 Radwaste Facility Effluent Line NIA l-RRM-RITS-131 VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 18 OF 156 6.2.2 Liquid Monitoring Instrumentation ( continued)  
: 1. If the number.of operable channels is less than the minimum required by the tables in Attachment 1 or 2, perform the action shown in those tables. 2. Attempt to return the instruments to operable status within 30 days. If unsuccessful, explain in the next Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report why the inoperability was not corrected in a timely manner. c. Appli~able Monitors Liquid effluent monitors for which alarm/trip setpoints shall be determined are: Release Point Instrument Number North Anna Surry Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line 1-LW-RM-111 NIA* Service Water Sys~em Effluent Line l-SW-RM-108 l-SW-RM-107 A, B,C,D Condenser Circulating Water Line l-SW-RM-130 l-SW-RM-120 2-SW-RM-230 2-SW-RM-220 Radwaste Facility Effluent Line NIA l-RRM-RITS-131 VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 18 OF 156 6.2.2 Liquid Monitoring Instrumentation ( continued)
: d. Setpoint Calculation NOTE: This methodology does not preclude use of more conservative setpoints.  
: d. Setpoint Calculation NOTE: This methodology does not preclude use of more conservative setpoints.
: 1. Maximum setpoint values shall be calculated by: s -where: S = the setpoint, in &#xb5;Ci/ml, of the radioactivity monitor measuring the radioactivity concentration in the effluent line prior to dilution C = the effluent concentration limit for the monitor used to implement 10 CFR 20 for the Station, in &#xb5;Ci/ml FE = maximum design pathway effluent flow rate F 0 = dilution water flow rate calculated as: (Surry) D =FE+ (200,000 gpm x number of circ. pumps in service) (2) (N. Anna) D =FE+ (218,000 gpm x number of circ. pumps in service) 2. Each of the condenser circulating water channels (Surry: SW-120, SW-220) (North Anna: SW-130, SW-230) monitors the effluent (service water, including component cooling service water, circulating water, and liquid radwaste) in the circulating water discharge tunnel beyond the last point of possible radioactive material addition.
: 1. Maximum setpoint values shall be calculated by: s -where: S = the setpoint, in &#xb5;Ci/ml, of the radioactivity monitor measuring the radioactivity concentration in the effluent line prior to dilution C = the effluent concentration limit for the monitor used to implement 10 CFR 20 for the Station, in &#xb5;Ci/ml FE = maximum design pathway effluent flow rate F 0 = dilution water flow rate calculated as: (Surry) D =FE+ (200,000 gpm x number of circ. pumps in service) (2) (N. Anna) D =FE+ (218,000 gpm x number of circ. pumps in service) 2. Each of the condenser circulating water channels (Surry: SW-120, SW-220) (North Anna: SW-130, SW-230) monitors the effluent (service water, including component cooling service water, circulating water, and liquid radwaste) in the circulating water discharge tunnel beyond the last point of possible radioactive material addition.
No dilution is assumed for this pathway. Therefore, Equation (2) becomes: S=C The setpoint for Station monitors used to implement 10 CFR 20 for the site becomes the effluent concentration limit. (3) 3. In addition, for added conservatism, setpoints shall be calculated for the liquid rad waste effluent line (North Anna: L W-111 ), the service water system effluent line (Surry: SW-107 A, B, C, and.D, North Anna: SW-108), and the Radwaste Facility effluent line (Surry: RRM-131).  
No dilution is assumed for this pathway. Therefore, Equation (2) becomes: S=C The setpoint for Station monitors used to implement 10 CFR 20 for the site becomes the effluent concentration limit. (3) 3. In addition, for added conservatism, setpoints shall be calculated for the liquid rad waste effluent line (North Anna: L W-111 ), the service water system effluent line (Surry: SW-107 A, B, C, and.D, North Anna: SW-108), and the Radwaste Facility effluent line (Surry: RRM-131).  
Line 449: Line 449:
However, for reporting purposes, calculated dose contribution shall be based on the actual composite analyses . *   
However, for reporting purposes, calculated dose contribution shall be based on the actual composite analyses . *   
* *
* *
* VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 23 OF 156 6.2.4 Liquid Radwaste Treatment  
* VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 23 OF 156 6.2.4 Liquid Radwaste Treatment
: a. Requirement  
: a. Requirement
: 1. The Liquid Radwaste Treatment System and/or the Surry Radwaste Facility Liquid Waste System shall be used to reduce the radioactive materials in liquid waste prior to discharge when projected dose due to liquid effluent.
: 1. The Liquid Radwaste Treatment System and/or the Surry Radwaste Facility Liquid Waste System shall be used to reduce the radioactive materials in liquid waste prior to discharge when projected dose due to liquid effluent.
from each reactor unit, to unrestricted areas would exceed 0.06 mrem to total pody or 0.2 mrem to the critical organ in a 31-day period. 2. Doses due to liquid releases shall be projected at least once per 31 days. b. Action If radioactive liquid waste is discharged without treatment and in excess of the . *above limits prepare and submit to the NRC, within 30 days, a special report in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports, that includes th~ following:  
from each reactor unit, to unrestricted areas would exceed 0.06 mrem to total pody or 0.2 mrem to the critical organ in a 31-day period. 2. Doses due to liquid releases shall be projected at least once per 31 days. b. Action If radioactive liquid waste is discharged without treatment and in excess of the . *above limits prepare and submit to the NRC, within 30 days, a special report in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports, that includes th~ following:
: 1. An explanation of why liquid rad waste was being discharged without treatment, identification of any inoperable equipment or sub-system, and the reason for the in operability . 2. Actions taken to restore inoperable equipment to operable status. 3. Summary description of actions taken to prevent recurrence.  
: 1. An explanation of why liquid rad waste was being discharged without treatment, identification of any inoperable equipment or sub-system, and the reason for the in operability . 2. Actions taken to restore inoperable equipment to operable status. 3. Summary description of actions taken to prevent recurrence.
: c. Projected Total Body Dose Calculation  
: c. Projected Total Body Dose Calculation
: 1. Determine DTB, the total body dose from liquid effluents in the previous 31-day period, per Equation (7) or Equation (9) (Surry and North Anna, respectively).  
: 1. Determine DTB, the total body dose from liquid effluents in the previous 31-day period, per Equation (7) or Equation (9) (Surry and North Anna, respectively).
: 2. Estimate R 1 , the ratio of the estimated volume of liquid effluent releases in the present 31-day period to the volume released in the previous 31-day period. 3. Estimate F 1 , the ratio of the estimated liquid effluent radioactivity concentration in the present 31-day period to liquid effluent concentration in the previous 31-day period (&#xb5;Ci/ml).
: 2. Estimate R 1 , the ratio of the estimated volume of liquid effluent releases in the present 31-day period to the volume released in the previous 31-day period. 3. Estimate F 1 , the ratio of the estimated liquid effluent radioactivity concentration in the present 31-day period to liquid effluent concentration in the previous 31-day period (&#xb5;Ci/ml).
* 4. Determine PDrn, the.projected total body dose in a 31-day period. (11)
* 4. Determine PDrn, the.projected total body dose in a 31-day period. (11)
VIRGINIA
VIRGINIA
* POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 24 OF 156 6.2.4 Liquid Radwaste Treatment (continued)  
* POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 24 OF 156 6.2.4 Liquid Radwaste Treatment (continued)
: d. Projected Critical Organ Dose Calculation.
: d. Projected Critical Organ Dose Calculation.
Historical data pertaining to the volumes and radioactivity of liquid effluents released in connection with specific Station functions, such as maintenance or refueling outages, shall be used in projections as appropriate.  
Historical data pertaining to the volumes and radioactivity of liquid effluents released in connection with specific Station functions, such as maintenance or refueling outages, shall be used in projections as appropriate.
: 1. Determine D 0 ," the critical organ dose from liquid effluents in the previous 31-day period, per Equation (7) or Equation (9) (Surry and North Anna, respectively).  
: 1. Determine D 0 ," the critical organ dose from liquid effluents in the previous 31-day period, per Equation (7) or Equation (9) (Surry and North Anna, respectively).
: 2. Estimate R 1 as in 6.2.4.c.2.  
: 2. Estimate R 1 as in 6.2.4.c.2.
: 3. Estimate F 1 as in 6.2.4.c.3.  
: 3. Estimate F 1 as in 6.2.4.c.3.
: 4. Determine PD 0 = projected critical organ dose in a 31-day period. 6.2.5 Liquid Sampling (12) Radioactive liquid wastes shall be sampled and analyzed according to the sampling and analysis requirements in Attachments 8 and 9, Radioactive Liquid Waste
: 4. Determine PD 0 = projected critical organ dose in a 31-day period. 6.2.5 Liquid Sampling (12) Radioactive liquid wastes shall be sampled and analyzed according to the sampling and analysis requirements in Attachments 8 and 9, Radioactive Liquid Waste
* Sampling and Analysis Program (Surry and North Anna, respectively).  
* Sampling and Analysis Program (Surry and North Anna, respectively).  
Line 472: Line 472:


====6.3.1 Gaseous====
====6.3.1 Gaseous====
Effluent Dose Rate Limitation  
Effluent Dose Rate Limitation
: a. Requirement Dose rate due to radioactive materials released in gaseous effluents from the site to areas at and beyond the site boundary shall be limited to: 1. The dose rate limit for noble gases shall be .s 500 rnrem/year to the total body and .s 3000 rnrem/year to the skin. 2. The dose rate limit for I 1 31 , I 133 , for tritium, and for all radioactive materials in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days shall be :51500 rnrem/year to th*e critical organ. b. Action 1. If dose rates exceed 6.3.1.a. limits, promptly decrease the release r~te to within the above limits. * * *   
: a. Requirement Dose rate due to radioactive materials released in gaseous effluents from the site to areas at and beyond the site boundary shall be limited to: 1. The dose rate limit for noble gases shall be .s 500 rnrem/year to the total body and .s 3000 rnrem/year to the skin. 2. The dose rate limit for I 1 31 , I 133 , for tritium, and for all radioactive materials in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days shall be :51500 rnrem/year to th*e critical organ. b. Action 1. If dose rates exceed 6.3.1.a. limits, promptly decrease the release r~te to within the above limits. * * *   
* * * ------------------------------
* * * ------------------------------
----VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 .PAGE 25 OF 156 2. Dose rates due to noble gases in gaseous effluents shall be d~termined, continuously, to be within 6.3.1.a. limits. 3. Dose rates due to 1 131 , I 133 , tritium, ~d all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days, in gaseous effluents shall be determined to be within the above limits by obtaining representative samples and performing analyses in accordance with the sampling and analysis program specified on Attachments 10 and 11, Radioactive Gaseous Waste Sampling and Analysis Program .
----VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 .PAGE 25 OF 156 2. Dose rates due to noble gases in gaseous effluents shall be d~termined, continuously, to be within 6.3.1.a. limits. 3. Dose rates due to 1 131 , I 133 , tritium, ~d all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days, in gaseous effluents shall be determined to be within the above limits by obtaining representative samples and performing analyses in accordance with the sampling and analysis program specified on Attachments 10 and 11, Radioactive Gaseous Waste Sampling and Analysis Program .
VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103.
VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103.
REVISION 6 PAGE 26 OF 156 6.3.1 Gaseous Effluent Dose Rate Limitation (continued)  
REVISION 6 PAGE 26 OF 156 6.3.1 Gaseous Effluent Dose Rate Limitation (continued)
: c. Calculations of Gaseous Effluent Dose Rates I. The dose rate limit for noble gases shall be determined to be within the limit by limiting the release rate to the lesser of: L[KivvQivv  
: c. Calculations of Gaseous Effluent Dose Rates I. The dose rate limit for noble gases shall be determined to be within the limit by limiting the release rate to the lesser of: L[KivvQivv  
+ KipvQipvl 500mrem/yr to the total body (13) i OR [(L. + l.lM. ) Q 1*vv + (L. + 1.lM. ) Q 1*pvl S 3000mrem/yr to the skin ,&#xa3;.J lVV lVV tpv 1pv i (14) where: Subscripts  
+ KipvQipvl 500mrem/yr to the total body (13) i OR [(L. + l.lM. ) Q 1*vv + (L. + 1.lM. ) Q 1*pvl S 3000mrem/yr to the skin ,&#xa3;.J lVV lVV tpv 1pv i (14) where: Subscripts  
Line 490: Line 490:
+ PipvQipv] 1500mrem/yrto the critical organ (15) i where: Pivv* Pipv = The critical orf:an dose factor for ventilation vents or process vent for I 131 , I 33 , H 3 , and all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days~ for the inhalation pathway, in mrem/yr per Curie/sec.
+ PipvQipv] 1500mrem/yrto the critical organ (15) i where: Pivv* Pipv = The critical orf:an dose factor for ventilation vents or process vent for I 131 , I 33 , H 3 , and all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days~ for the inhalation pathway, in mrem/yr per Curie/sec.
Factors are listed in Attachments 12 and 13 = The release rate for ventilation vents or process vent of I 131 , I 133 , H 3 , and all radionuclides i, in particulate  
Factors are listed in Attachments 12 and 13 = The release rate for ventilation vents or process vent of I 131 , I 133 , H 3 , and all radionuclides i, in particulate  
*form with lives greater than 8 days, in gaseous effluents in Curie/sec (per site) 3. All gaseous releases, not through the process vent, are considered ground level and shall be included in the determination of Qiw . 6.3.2 Gaseous Monitoring Instrumentation  
*form with lives greater than 8 days, in gaseous effluents in Curie/sec (per site) 3. All gaseous releases, not through the process vent, are considered ground level and shall be included in the determination of Qiw . 6.3.2 Gaseous Monitoring Instrumentation
: a. Requirement  
: a. Requirement
: 1. The radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Attachment 14 or 15, Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation, shall be operable with alarm/trip setpoints set to ensure that 6.3.1.a. noble gas limits are not exceeded.
: 1. The radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Attachment 14 or 15, Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation, shall be operable with alarm/trip setpoints set to ensure that 6.3.1.a. noble gas limits are not exceeded.
Alarm/trip setpoints of these channels shall be determined and adjusted in accordance with 6.3.2.d. 2. Each radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated operable by Channel Checks, Source Checks, Channel Calibrations, and Channel Functional Tests at the frequencies shown in Attachment 16 or 17, Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Surveillance Requirements .
Alarm/trip setpoints of these channels shall be determined and adjusted in accordance with 6.3.2.d. 2. Each radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated operable by Channel Checks, Source Checks, Channel Calibrations, and Channel Functional Tests at the frequencies shown in Attachment 16 or 17, Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Surveillance Requirements .
VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 28 OF 156 6.3.2 Gaseous Monitoring Instrumentation (continued)  
VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 28 OF 156 6.3.2 Gaseous Monitoring Instrumentation (continued)
: b. Action 1. If a radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel alarm/trip setpoint is less conservative than required by 6.3.2.a.l, promptly:
: b. Action 1. If a radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel alarm/trip setpoint is less conservative than required by 6.3.2.a.l, promptly:
* Suspend the release of radioactive gaseous effluents monitored by the affected channel and declare the channel inoperable
* Suspend the release of radioactive gaseous effluents monitored by the affected channel and declare the channel inoperable
* or
* or
* Change the setpoint so it is acceptably conservative  
* Change the setpoint so it is acceptably conservative
: 2. If the number of operable channels is less than the minimum required by tables in Attachment 14 and 15, take the action shown in those tables. 3. Return instruments to operable status within 30 days. If unsuccessful, explain in the next Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report why the inoperability was not corrected in a timely manner. c. Applicable Monitors Radioactive gaseous effluent monitors for which alarm/trip setpoints shall be determined are: Release Point Instrument Number North Anna Surry Process Vent 1-GW-RM-102 1-GW-RM-102 l-GW-RM-178-1 1-GW-RM-130-1 Condenser Air Ejector 1-SV-RM-121 1-SV-RM-111 2-SV-RM-221 2-SV-RM-211 Ventilation Vent A 1-VG-RM-104 NIA 1-VG-RM-179-1 Ventilation Vent B 1-VG-RM-113 NIA 1-VG-RM-180-1 Ventilation Vent No. 1 NIA 1-VG-RM-104 Ventilation Vent No. 2 NIA 1-VG-RM-110 1-VG-RM-131-1 Radwaste Facility Vent NIA RRM-101 * * *   
: 2. If the number of operable channels is less than the minimum required by tables in Attachment 14 and 15, take the action shown in those tables. 3. Return instruments to operable status within 30 days. If unsuccessful, explain in the next Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report why the inoperability was not corrected in a timely manner. c. Applicable Monitors Radioactive gaseous effluent monitors for which alarm/trip setpoints shall be determined are: Release Point Instrument Number North Anna Surry Process Vent 1-GW-RM-102 1-GW-RM-102 l-GW-RM-178-1 1-GW-RM-130-1 Condenser Air Ejector 1-SV-RM-121 1-SV-RM-111 2-SV-RM-221 2-SV-RM-211 Ventilation Vent A 1-VG-RM-104 NIA 1-VG-RM-179-1 Ventilation Vent B 1-VG-RM-113 NIA 1-VG-RM-180-1 Ventilation Vent No. 1 NIA 1-VG-RM-104 Ventilation Vent No. 2 NIA 1-VG-RM-110 1-VG-RM-131-1 Radwaste Facility Vent NIA RRM-101 * * *   
* * ** VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 29*0F 156 d. Setpoint Calculations L Setpoint calculations for each monitor listed in 6.3.2.c. shall maintain this relationship:
* * ** VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 29*0F 156 d. Setpoint Calculations L Setpoint calculations for each monitor listed in 6.3.2.c. shall maintain this relationship:
Line 507: Line 507:
* radioactive materials in particulate form, and radionuclides other than noble gases. 6.3.3 Noble Gas Effluent Air Dose Limit a. Requirement I. The air dose in unrestricted areas due to noble gases released in gaseous effluents from each unit at or beyond the site boundary shall be limited .to:
* radioactive materials in particulate form, and radionuclides other than noble gases. 6.3.3 Noble Gas Effluent Air Dose Limit a. Requirement I. The air dose in unrestricted areas due to noble gases released in gaseous effluents from each unit at or beyond the site boundary shall be limited .to:
* During any calendar quarter: 5 5 mrads for gamma radiation and *5 10 mrads for beta radiation
* During any calendar quarter: 5 5 mrads for gamma radiation and *5 10 mrads for beta radiation
* During any calendar year: 510 mrads for gamma radiation and 520 mrads for beta radiation  
* During any calendar year: 510 mrads for gamma radiation and 520 mrads for beta radiation
: 2. Cumulative dose contributions for noble gases for the current calendar quarter and current calendar year shall be determined in accordance with 6.3.3.c. at least once per 31 days. *   
: 2. Cumulative dose contributions for noble gases for the current calendar quarter and current calendar year shall be determined in accordance with 6.3.3.c. at least once per 31 days. *   
* *
* *
* VIRGINIA POWER b. Action VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 31 OF IS6 If the calculated air dose from radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents exceeds any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the NRC, within 30 days, a* special report in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports, that identifies the causes for exceeding the limits and defines corrective actions that have been taken to reduce releases and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the limits in 6.3.3.a. c. Noble Gas Effluent Air Dose Calculation Gaseous releases, not through the process vent, are considered ground level and shall be included in the determination of Oi.vv* The air dose to areas at or beyond the site boundary due to ~oble gases shall be determined by the following:
* VIRGINIA POWER b. Action VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 31 OF IS6 If the calculated air dose from radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents exceeds any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the NRC, within 30 days, a* special report in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports, that identifies the causes for exceeding the limits and defines corrective actions that have been taken to reduce releases and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the limits in 6.3.3.a. c. Noble Gas Effluent Air Dose Calculation Gaseous releases, not through the process vent, are considered ground level and shall be included in the determination of Oi.vv* The air dose to areas at or beyond the site boundary due to ~oble gases shall be determined by the following:
For gamma radiation:
For gamma radiation:
Dg = 3.17E-08L  
Dg = 3.17E-08L
[MivvQivv  
[MivvQivv  
+ MipvQipv]
+ MipvQipv]
Line 523: Line 523:
Factors are listed in Attachments 12 and' 13 the release for ventilation vents or process vent of noble gas radionuclide i, in gaseous effluents for 31 days, quarter, or year as appropriate in Curies (per site) * * *   
Factors are listed in Attachments 12 and' 13 the release for ventilation vents or process vent of noble gas radionuclide i, in gaseous effluents for 31 days, quarter, or year as appropriate in Curies (per site) * * *   
* *
* *
* VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 33 OF 156 6.3.4 1-131, 1-133, H-3, and Radionuclides In Particulate Form Effluent Dose Limit a. Requirement  
* VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 33 OF 156 6.3.4 1-131, 1-133, H-3, and Radionuclides In Particulate Form Effluent Dose Limit a. Requirement
: 1. Methods shall be implemented to ensure that the dose t0 any organ of a member of the public from I 131 , I 133 , tritium, and all rad~onuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days, in gaseous effluents released from the site to unrestricted areas from each reactor unit shall be:
: 1. Methods shall be implemented to ensure that the dose t0 any organ of a member of the public from I 131 , I 133 , tritium, and all rad~onuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days, in gaseous effluents released from the site to unrestricted areas from each reactor unit shall be:
* During any calendar quarter: .:s; 7.5 mrem to the critical organ
* During any calendar quarter: .:s; 7.5 mrem to the critical organ
* During any calendar year:.=:;, 15 mrem to the critical organ 2. Cumulative dose contributions to a member of the public from I 131 , I 133 , tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days, in gaseous effluents released to unrestricted areas for the current calendar quarter and current calendar year shall be determined at least once per 31 days in accordance with 6.3.4.c. or 6.3.4.d. b. Action If the calculated dose from the release of I 131 , I 133 , tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form, with half-lives greater than 8 days, in gaseous effluents exceeds any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the NRC within 30 days, a special report in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports, that contains the: 1. Causes for exceeding limits. 2. Corrective actions taken to reduce releases.  
* During any calendar year:.=:;, 15 mrem to the critical organ 2. Cumulative dose contributions to a member of the public from I 131 , I 133 , tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days, in gaseous effluents released to unrestricted areas for the current calendar quarter and current calendar year shall be determined at least once per 31 days in accordance with 6.3.4.c. or 6.3.4.d. b. Action If the calculated dose from the release of I 131 , I 133 , tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form, with half-lives greater than 8 days, in gaseous effluents exceeds any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the NRC within 30 days, a special report in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports, that contains the: 1. Causes for exceeding limits. 2. Corrective actions taken to reduce releases.
: 3. Proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with limits stated in 6.3.4.a. c. Surry Dose Calculations Gaseous releases, not through the process vent, are considered ground level and shall be included in the determination of Q;vv. Historical data pertaining to the volumes and radioactive concentrations of gaseous effluents released in connection to specific Station functions.
: 3. Proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with limits stated in 6.3.4.a. c. Surry Dose Calculations Gaseous releases, not through the process vent, are considered ground level and shall be included in the determination of Q;vv. Historical data pertaining to the volumes and radioactive concentrations of gaseous effluents released in connection to specific Station functions.
such as containment purges, shall be used in the estimates, as appropriate .   
such as containment purges, shall be used in the estimates, as appropriate .   
Line 536: Line 536:
Factors are listed in Attachment 18 the release for ventilation vents or process vent of I 131 , I 133 , tritium, and from all particulate-form radionuclides with lives greater than 8 days in Curies 3.17 E-08 = the inverse of the number of seconds in a year *   
Factors are listed in Attachment 18 the release for ventilation vents or process vent of I 131 , I 133 , tritium, and from all particulate-form radionuclides with lives greater than 8 days in Curies 3.17 E-08 = the inverse of the number of seconds in a year *   
* *
* *
* VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 35 OF 156 6.3.4 1-131, 1-133, H-3, and -Radionuclides In Particulate Form Effluent Dose Limit (continued)  
* VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 35 OF 156 6.3.4 1-131, 1-133, H-3, and -Radionuclides In Particulate Form Effluent Dose Limit (continued)
: d. North Anna Dose Calculations Gaseous releases, not through the process vent, are considered ground level and shall be included in the detennination of '2ivv* Historical data pertaining to the volumes and radioactive concentrations of gaseous effluents released in connection to specific Station functions, such as containment purges, shall be used ~n the estimates as appropriate.  
: d. North Anna Dose Calculations Gaseous releases, not through the process vent, are considered ground level and shall be included in the detennination of '2ivv* Historical data pertaining to the volumes and radioactive concentrations of gaseous effluents released in connection to specific Station functions, such as containment purges, shall be used ~n the estimates as appropriate.
: 1. The dose to the maximum exposed member of the public, attributable to gaseous effluents at and beyond the site boundary, that contain 1 131 , 1 13 3, tritium, and particulate-form radionuclides with half-lives greater than 8 days, shall be detennined by: Where: )r = 3.17E-08 L [RMivvQivv  
: 1. The dose to the maximum exposed member of the public, attributable to gaseous effluents at and beyond the site boundary, that contain 1 131 , 1 13 3, tritium, and particulate-form radionuclides with half-lives greater than 8 days, shall be detennined by: Where: )r = 3.17E-08 L [RMivvQivv  
+ RMipvQipv.
+ RMipvQipv.
Line 543: Line 543:
= vv, refers to vent releases from the building ventilation vents; pv, refers to the vent releases from the process vent Dr = the dose to the critical organ of the maximum exposed member of the public, in mrem RMivv, RMipv =the cow-milk dose factor for ventilation vents or process vent release due to I 13 l, I 133 , tritium, and from all particulate-form radionuclides with half-lives greater than 8 days, in mrem/yr per Curie/sec.
= vv, refers to vent releases from the building ventilation vents; pv, refers to the vent releases from the process vent Dr = the dose to the critical organ of the maximum exposed member of the public, in mrem RMivv, RMipv =the cow-milk dose factor for ventilation vents or process vent release due to I 13 l, I 133 , tritium, and from all particulate-form radionuclides with half-lives greater than 8 days, in mrem/yr per Curie/sec.
Factors are listed in Attachment 19, Critical Organ Dose Factors for North Anna QivvQipv = the release for ventilation vents or process vent of I 131 , I 133 , tritium, and from all particulate-form radionuclides with lives greater than 8 days, in Curies 3.17 E-08 = the inverse of the number of seconds in a year VIRGINIA
Factors are listed in Attachment 19, Critical Organ Dose Factors for North Anna QivvQipv = the release for ventilation vents or process vent of I 131 , I 133 , tritium, and from all particulate-form radionuclides with lives greater than 8 days, in Curies 3.17 E-08 = the inverse of the number of seconds in a year VIRGINIA
* POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 36 OF 156 6.3.5 Gaseous Radwaste Treatment Historical data pertaining to the volumes and radioactive concentrations of gaseous effluents released in connection with specific Station functions, such as containment purges, shall be used to calculate projected doses, as appropriate.  
* POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 36 OF 156 6.3.5 Gaseous Radwaste Treatment Historical data pertaining to the volumes and radioactive concentrations of gaseous effluents released in connection with specific Station functions, such as containment purges, shall be used to calculate projected doses, as appropriate.
: a. Requirement  
: a. Requirement
: 1. The Gaseous Radwaste Treatment System and the Ventilation Exhaust* Treatment System shall be used to reduce radioactive material in gaseous waste before its discharge, when projected gaseous effluent air doses due to gaseous effluent releases, from each unit to areas at and beyond the site boundary, would exceed 0.2 mrad for gamma radiation and 0.4 mrad for beta radiation, averaged over 31 days. (North Anna) 2*. Appropriate portions of the Gaseous Radwaste Treatment System shall be used to reduce radioactive materials in gaseous waste before its discharge, when the projected gaseous effluent air doses due to gaseous effluent releases, from each unit to areas at and beyond the site boundary, would exceed 0.2 mrad for gamma radiation and 0.4 m:rad for beta radiation, averaged over 31 days. (Surry)
: 1. The Gaseous Radwaste Treatment System and the Ventilation Exhaust* Treatment System shall be used to reduce radioactive material in gaseous waste before its discharge, when projected gaseous effluent air doses due to gaseous effluent releases, from each unit to areas at and beyond the site boundary, would exceed 0.2 mrad for gamma radiation and 0.4 mrad for beta radiation, averaged over 31 days. (North Anna) 2*. Appropriate portions of the Gaseous Radwaste Treatment System shall be used to reduce radioactive materials in gaseous waste before its discharge, when the projected gaseous effluent air doses due to gaseous effluent releases, from each unit to areas at and beyond the site boundary, would exceed 0.2 mrad for gamma radiation and 0.4 m:rad for beta radiation, averaged over 31 days. (Surry)
* 3. The Ventilation Exhaust Treatment System shall be used to reduce radioactive
* 3. The Ventilation Exhaust Treatment System shall be used to reduce radioactive
* materials in gaseous waste before its discharge, when the projected doses due to gaseous effluent releases, from each unit to areas at and beyond the site boundary, would exceed 0.3 mrem to the critical organ, averaged over 31 days. 4. Doses due to gaseous releases from the site shall be projected at least once per 31 days, based on the calculations in 6.3.5.c., and 6.3.5.d. b. Action If gaseous waste that exceeds the limits in 6.3.5.a. is discharged without treatment, prepare and submit to the NRC within 30 days, a sp~cial report in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports, that includes:  
* materials in gaseous waste before its discharge, when the projected doses due to gaseous effluent releases, from each unit to areas at and beyond the site boundary, would exceed 0.3 mrem to the critical organ, averaged over 31 days. 4. Doses due to gaseous releases from the site shall be projected at least once per 31 days, based on the calculations in 6.3.5.c., and 6.3.5.d. b. Action If gaseous waste that exceeds the limits in 6.3.5.a. is discharged without treatment, prepare and submit to the NRC within 30 days, a sp~cial report in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports, that includes:
: 1. An explanation why gaseous rad waste was being discharged without treatment, identification of any inoperable equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the inoperability.  
: 1. An explanation why gaseous rad waste was being discharged without treatment, identification of any inoperable equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the inoperability.
: 2. Actions taken to restore the inoperable equipment to operable status. 3. Summary description of actions taken to prevent recurrence.  
: 2. Actions taken to restore the inoperable equipment to operable status. 3. Summary description of actions taken to prevent recurrence.  
*   
*   
* *
* *
* VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 -PAGE 37 OF 156 6.3.5 Gaseous Radwaste Treatment (continued)  
* VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 -PAGE 37 OF 156 6.3.5 Gaseous Radwaste Treatment (continued)
: c. Projecied Gamma Dose 1 Determine Dg, the J 1-day gamma air close for the previous 31-day period, per Eq~ation (18). 2. Estimate Rg, the ratio of the estimated volume of gaseous effluent in the current 31-day period to the volume released during the previous 31-day period. 3. Estimate Fg, the ratio of the estimated noble gas effluent activity in the current 31-day period to. the noble gas effluent activity during the previous 31-day period (&#xb5;Ci/ml).  
: c. Projecied Gamma Dose 1 Determine Dg, the J 1-day gamma air close for the previous 31-day period, per Eq~ation (18). 2. Estimate Rg, the ratio of the estimated volume of gaseous effluent in the current 31-day period to the volume released during the previous 31-day period. 3. Estimate Fg, the ratio of the estimated noble gas effluent activity in the current 31-day period to. the noble gas effluent activity during the previous 31-day period (&#xb5;Ci/ml).
: 4. Determine PDg, the projected 31-day gamma air dose. PD = D (R xF ) g g g g d. Projected Beta Dose 1. Determine Db, the 31-day beta air dose in the previous 31 days, per Equation ( 19) . 2. Estimate Rg and Fg as in 6.3.5.c.2.
: 4. Determine PDg, the projected 31-day gamma air dose. PD = D (R xF ) g g g g d. Projected Beta Dose 1. Determine Db, the 31-day beta air dose in the previous 31 days, per Equation ( 19) . 2. Estimate Rg and Fg as in 6.3.5.c.2.
and 6.3.5.c.3.  
and 6.3.5.c.3.
: 3. Determine PDb, the projected 31-day beta air dose. e. Projected Maximum Exposed Member of the Public Dose (22) (23) 1. Determine Dmax, the 31-day maximum exposed member of the public dose in the previous 31-day period, per Equation (20) or Equation (21 ), where Dr = Dmax-2. Estimate Fi, the ratio of the estimated activity from I 131 , I 133 , radioactive materials in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days, and tritium in the current 31-day period to the activity of I 131 , I 133 , radioactive materials in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days, and tritium in the previous 31-day period (&#xb5;Ci/ml) .
: 3. Determine PDb, the projected 31-day beta air dose. e. Projected Maximum Exposed Member of the Public Dose (22) (23) 1. Determine Dmax, the 31-day maximum exposed member of the public dose in the previous 31-day period, per Equation (20) or Equation (21 ), where Dr = Dmax-2. Estimate Fi, the ratio of the estimated activity from I 131 , I 133 , radioactive materials in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days, and tritium in the current 31-day period to the activity of I 131 , I 133 , radioactive materials in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days, and tritium in the previous 31-day period (&#xb5;Ci/ml) .
VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103.
VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103.
Line 572: Line 572:
* Condensate Polishing Building Sumps when RP determines the presence of contamination from primary-to-secondary leakage * **   
* Condensate Polishing Building Sumps when RP determines the presence of contamination from primary-to-secondary leakage * **   
* **
* **
* VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 39 OF 156 6.4.1 Liquid Waste Batch Release Permits (continued)  
* VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 39 OF 156 6.4.1 Liquid Waste Batch Release Permits (continued)
: b. North Anna Batch Releases NOTE: If the clarifier is in service, releases from tanks processed through the .clarifier are considered continuous releases.
: b. North Anna Batch Releases NOTE: If the clarifier is in service, releases from tanks processed through the .clarifier are considered continuous releases.
A Batch Release Pennit is required for a .release from any tanks/sumps which contain (or potentially contain) radioactive liquid. Tanks/sumps include:
A Batch Release Pennit is required for a .release from any tanks/sumps which contain (or potentially contain) radioactive liquid. Tanks/sumps include:
Line 589: Line 589:
* Routine termination
* Routine termination
* Terminated for cause by RP
* Terminated for cause by RP
* Receipt of Radiation Monitoring System (RMS) Containment Gas Monitor high alarm 6.4.5 Miscellaneous Gaseous Release Permit Operations shall obtain RP author~zation before initiating releases of noble gases that may not be accounted for by routine sampling, or any planned release not being routed through the Process Vent or Ventilation Vents (e.g., steam driven auxiliary feedwater pump testing if primary to secondary leakage exists). 6.4.6 Radioactive Liquid and Gaseous Release Controls a. Operations shall notify RP of pending releases and request RP to initiate the appropriate release permit. Operations shall provide the necessary information to complete the required release permit. b. A representative sample shall be obtained of the source to be released.  
* Receipt of Radiation Monitoring System (RMS) Containment Gas Monitor high alarm 6.4.5 Miscellaneous Gaseous Release Permit Operations shall obtain RP author~zation before initiating releases of noble gases that may not be accounted for by routine sampling, or any planned release not being routed through the Process Vent or Ventilation Vents (e.g., steam driven auxiliary feedwater pump testing if primary to secondary leakage exists). 6.4.6 Radioactive Liquid and Gaseous Release Controls a. Operations shall notify RP of pending releases and request RP to initiate the appropriate release permit. Operations shall provide the necessary information to complete the required release permit. b. A representative sample shall be obtained of the source to be released.
: 1. Operations shall provide RP with liquid samples and sample information (e.g., time of sample) for samples obtained outside the Primary Sample Room, except Clarifier Proportional Tank and Clarifier Grab Samples at North Anna. 2. Chemistry shall provide RP with iiquid samples and sample information for samples obtained from inside the Primary Sample Room. 3. RP shall obtain gaseous samples. c. RP shall perform required sample analyses.  
: 1. Operations shall provide RP with liquid samples and sample information (e.g., time of sample) for samples obtained outside the Primary Sample Room, except Clarifier Proportional Tank and Clarifier Grab Samples at North Anna. 2. Chemistry shall provide RP with iiquid samples and sample information for samples obtained from inside the Primary Sample Room. 3. RP shall obtain gaseous samples. c. RP shall perform required sample analyses.
: d. RP shall calculate and record the following information on a release permit:
: d. RP shall calculate and record the following information on a release permit:
* Maximum authorized release rate
* Maximum authorized release rate
* Maximum authorized release rate in percentage of limits specified by the ODCM
* Maximum authorized release rate in percentage of limits specified by the ODCM
* Applicable conditions or controls pertaining to the release * * *   
* Applicable conditions or controls pertaining to the release * * *   
* * ** VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 41 OF 156 6.4.6 Radioactive Liquid and Gaseous Release Controls (continued)  
* * ** VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 41 OF 156 6.4.6 Radioactive Liquid and Gaseous Release Controls (continued)
: e. RP shall notify the Shift Supervisor if it is determined that a release may not be within the effluent dose limits. f. Upon receipt of a release permit from RP, Operations shall: L Verify the correct source is authorized for release. 2. Note maximum authorized release rate.
: e. RP shall notify the Shift Supervisor if it is determined that a release may not be within the effluent dose limits. f. Upon receipt of a release permit from RP, Operations shall: L Verify the correct source is authorized for release. 2. Note maximum authorized release rate.
* 3. Note percent of Technical Specification limits the release represents.  
* 3. Note percent of Technical Specification limits the release represents.
: 4. Note and ensure compliance with any indicated controls or conditions applicable to the release. g. When commencing release, Operations shall provide RP with required information.
: 4. Note and ensure compliance with any indicated controls or conditions applicable to the release. g. When commencing release, Operations shall provide RP with required information.
As approp~ate, required information shall include:
As approp~ate, required information shall include:
Line 611: Line 611:
* Ending pressure
* Ending pressure
* Volume released 6.5 Total Dose Limit to Public From Uranium Fuel Cycle Sources 6.5.1 Requirement The annual (calendar year) dose or dose commitment to a real individual due to releases of radioactivity and radiation from uranium fuel cycle sources shall not exceed 25 mrem to the total body or the critical organ (except the thyroid, which shall not exceed 75 mrem) .
* Volume released 6.5 Total Dose Limit to Public From Uranium Fuel Cycle Sources 6.5.1 Requirement The annual (calendar year) dose or dose commitment to a real individual due to releases of radioactivity and radiation from uranium fuel cycle sources shall not exceed 25 mrem to the total body or the critical organ (except the thyroid, which shall not exceed 75 mrem) .
VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 42 OF 156 6.5.2 Action a. If the calculated doses from release of radioactive materials in liquid or gaseous effluents exceed twice the limits in 6.2.3.a., 6.3.3.a., or 6.3.4.a., calculate (including direct radiation contribution from the units and from outside* storage tanks) whether limits in 6.5.1 have been exceeded.  
VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 42 OF 156 6.5.2 Action a. If the calculated doses from release of radioactive materials in liquid or gaseous effluents exceed twice the limits in 6.2.3.a., 6.3.3.a., or 6.3.4.a., calculate (including direct radiation contribution from the units and from outside* storage tanks) whether limits in 6.5.1 have been exceeded.
: b. If the limits in 6.5.1 have been exceeded, prepare and submit to the NRC within 30 days, a special report in accordance with VP AP-2802, Notifications and Reports, ~at defines the corrective action to be taken to reduce subsequent releases and to prevent recurrence, and includes a schedule for achieving conformance wi m the limits. Special reports, as defined in 10 CFR 20.2203(a)(4), shall include: 1. An analysis that estimates the radiation exposure (dose) to a real individual from uranium fuel cycle sources, including all effluent pathways and direct radiation, for the calendar year that includes the releases covered by the report. 2. A description of the levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive material involved, and the cause of the exposure levels or concentrations.  
: b. If the limits in 6.5.1 have been exceeded, prepare and submit to the NRC within 30 days, a special report in accordance with VP AP-2802, Notifications and Reports, ~at defines the corrective action to be taken to reduce subsequent releases and to prevent recurrence, and includes a schedule for achieving conformance wi m the limits. Special reports, as defined in 10 CFR 20.2203(a)(4), shall include: 1. An analysis that estimates the radiation exposure (dose) to a real individual from uranium fuel cycle sources, including all effluent pathways and direct radiation, for the calendar year that includes the releases covered by the report. 2. A description of the levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive material involved, and the cause of the exposure levels or concentrations.
: 3. If the estimated dose exceeds the limits in 6.5.1, and if the release condition that violates 40 CFR 190 has not already been corrected, the special report shall include a request for a variance in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR 190. Submittal of the report is considered a timely request, and a variance is granted until staff action on the request is complete.  
: 3. If the estimated dose exceeds the limits in 6.5.1, and if the release condition that violates 40 CFR 190 has not already been corrected, the special report shall include a request for a variance in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR 190. Submittal of the report is considered a timely request, and a variance is granted until staff action on the request is complete.  
* * *   
* * *   
Line 620: Line 620:
====6.6.1 Monitoring====
====6.6.1 Monitoring====


Program a. Requirement  
Program a. Requirement
: 1. The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program shall be conducted as specified in Attachments 20 or 21, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program. 2. Samples shall be collected from specific locations specified in Attachment 22 or 23, Environmental Sample Locations.  
: 1. The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program shall be conducted as specified in Attachments 20 or 21, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program. 2. Samples shall be collected from specific locations specified in Attachment 22 or 23, Environmental Sample Locations.
[Commitment 3.2.2] 3. Samples shall be analyzed in accordance with:
[Commitment 3.2.2] 3. Samples shall be analyzed in accordance with:
* Attachment 20 or 21 requirem~nts
* Attachment 20 or 21 requirem~nts
* Detection capabilities required by Attachment 24 or 25, Detection Capabilities for Environmental Sample Analysis
* Detection capabilities required by Attachment 24 or 25, Detection Capabilities for Environmental Sample Analysis
* Guidance of the Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position on Environmental Monitoring dated November, 1979, Revision No. 1 b. Action 1. If the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program is not being conducted as required in 6.6.1.a., report the situation in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports, by preparing and submitting to ~he NRC, in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report required by Technical Specification (Surry Technical Specification 6.6.B.2 and North Anna Technical Specification 6.9.1.8), a description of the reasons for not conducting the program as required, and the plan for precluding recurrence.  
* Guidance of the Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position on Environmental Monitoring dated November, 1979, Revision No. 1 b. Action 1. If the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program is not being conducted as required in 6.6.1.a., report the situation in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports, by preparing and submitting to ~he NRC, in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report required by Technical Specification (Surry Technical Specification 6.6.B.2 and North Anna Technical Specification 6.9.1.8), a description of the reasons for not conducting the program as required, and the plan for precluding recurrence.
: 2. If, when averaged over any calendar quarter, radioactivity exceeds the reporting levels of Attachment 26 or 27, Reporting Levels for Radioactivity Concentrations in Environmental Samples, prepare and submit to the NRC within 30 days, a special report in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports, that:
: 2. If, when averaged over any calendar quarter, radioactivity exceeds the reporting levels of Attachment 26 or 27, Reporting Levels for Radioactivity Concentrations in Environmental Samples, prepare and submit to the NRC within 30 days, a special report in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports, that:
* Identifies the causes for exceeding the limits, and
* Identifies the causes for exceeding the limits, and
Line 633: Line 633:
* Nearest milk animal
* Nearest milk animal
* Nearest residence
* Nearest residence
* Nearest garden greater than 50 m2 (500 ft2) that produces broad leaf vegetation  
* Nearest garden greater than 50 m2 (500 ft2) that produces broad leaf vegetation
: 1. The land use census shall be conducted during the growing season, at least once per 12 months, using methods that will provide the best results (e.g., door survey, aerial survey, local agriculture authorities).
: 1. The land use census shall be conducted during the growing season, at least once per 12 months, using methods that will provide the best results (e.g., door survey, aerial survey, local agriculture authorities).
Land use census results shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports. 2. In lieu of the garden census, road leaf vegetation sampling of at least three different kinds of vegetation may be performed at the site boundary in each of two different direction sectors with the highest predicted ground deposition (D/ Qs). Specifications for broad leaf vegetation sampling in Attachment 20 or 21 shall be followed, including analysis of control samples. b. Action 1. If a land use census identifies locations that yield a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated in 6.3.4.a.2, identify the new locations in the next Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports. 2. If a land use census identifies locations that yield a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway) 20 percent (Surry) or 25 percent (North Anna) greater than at a location from which samples are currently being obtained, add the new locations to the Radiological Environmental Moni~oring Program within 30 days. Sampling locations, excluding the control station location, that have the lowest calculated dose or dose commitments (via the same exposure pathway) may be deleted from the monitoring program. Identify new locations in the next Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report and include in the report revised figures and tables reflecting the new locations in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports. [Commitment 3.2.4]
Land use census results shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports. 2. In lieu of the garden census, road leaf vegetation sampling of at least three different kinds of vegetation may be performed at the site boundary in each of two different direction sectors with the highest predicted ground deposition (D/ Qs). Specifications for broad leaf vegetation sampling in Attachment 20 or 21 shall be followed, including analysis of control samples. b. Action 1. If a land use census identifies locations that yield a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated in 6.3.4.a.2, identify the new locations in the next Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports. 2. If a land use census identifies locations that yield a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway) 20 percent (Surry) or 25 percent (North Anna) greater than at a location from which samples are currently being obtained, add the new locations to the Radiological Environmental Moni~oring Program within 30 days. Sampling locations, excluding the control station location, that have the lowest calculated dose or dose commitments (via the same exposure pathway) may be deleted from the monitoring program. Identify new locations in the next Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report and include in the report revised figures and tables reflecting the new locations in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports. [Commitment 3.2.4]
VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 46 OF 156 6.6.3 Interlaboratory Comparison Program . *
VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 46 OF 156 6.6.3 Interlaboratory Comparison Program . *
* a. Requirement Radioactive materials (which contain nuclides produced at the Stations), supplied as part of an Interlaboratory Comparison Program that has been approved by the NRC, shall be analyzed.  
* a. Requirement Radioactive materials (which contain nuclides produced at the Stations), supplied as part of an Interlaboratory Comparison Program that has been approved by the NRC, shall be analyzed.
: b. Action I. Analyses shall be performed as part of the Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Intercomparison Studies (Cross Check) Program and include: Program Mille Water Air Filter Cross-Check  
: b. Action I. Analyses shall be performed as part of the Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Intercomparison Studies (Cross Check) Program and include: Program Mille Water Air Filter Cross-Check  
*of I 131 , Gamma, K, Sr 89 and Sr 90 Gross Beta, Gamma, I 131 , H 3 (Tritium), Sr 89 and Sr 90 (blind-any combinations of above radionuclides)
*of I 131 , Gamma, K, Sr 89 and Sr 90 Gross Beta, Gamma, I 131 , H 3 (Tritium), Sr 89 and Sr 90 (blind-any combinations of above radionuclides)
Line 643: Line 643:
* *
* *
* VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6
* VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6
* PAGE 47 OF 156 6.6.3 lnterlaboratory Comparison Program (continued)  
* PAGE 47 OF 156 6.6.3 lnterlaboratory Comparison Program (continued)
: c. Methodology and Results 1. Methodology and results of the cross-check program shall be maintained in the contractor-supplied Nuclear Reactor Environmental Radiation Monitoring Quali.ty Control Manual, IWL-0032-361.  
: c. Methodology and Results 1. Methodology and results of the cross-check program shall be maintained in the contractor-supplied Nuclear Reactor Environmental Radiation Monitoring Quali.ty Control Manual, IWL-0032-361.
: 2. Results shall be reported in the Annual ~adiological Environmental Monitoring Report in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports. 6.7 Reporting Requirements  
: 2. Results shall be reported in the Annual ~adiological Environmental Monitoring Report in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports. 6.7 Reporting Requirements  


Line 652: Line 652:
* A comparison (as appropriate) with preoperational studies, operational controls, and previous environmental surveillance reports
* A comparison (as appropriate) with preoperational studies, operational controls, and previous environmental surveillance reports
* An assessment of the observed impacts of the plant operation on the environment
* An assessment of the observed impacts of the plant operation on the environment
* Results of land use census per 6.6.2 b. Results of analysis of radiological environmental samples and of environmental radiation measurements taken per 6.6.1, Monitoring Program. Results shall be summarized and tabulated in the format of the table in the Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position on Environmental Monitoring.  
* Results of land use census per 6.6.2 b. Results of analysis of radiological environmental samples and of environmental radiation measurements taken per 6.6.1, Monitoring Program. Results shall be summarized and tabulated in the format of the table in the Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position on Environmental Monitoring.
: 1. If some individual results are not available for inclusion with the report, the report shall be submitted, noting and explaining reasons for missing results. 2. Missing data shall be submitted in a supplementary report as soon as possible.  
: 1. If some individual results are not available for inclusion with the report, the report shall be submitted, noting and explaining reasons for missing results. 2. Missing data shall be submitted in a supplementary report as soon as possible.
: c. A summary description of the radiological environmental monitoring program. d. At least two legible maps covering sampling locations, keyed to a table giving distances and directions from the centerline of one reactor. One map shall cover stations near the site boundary; a second shall include more distant stations .
: c. A summary description of the radiological environmental monitoring program. d. At least two legible maps covering sampling locations, keyed to a table giving distances and directions from the centerline of one reactor. One map shall cover stations near the site boundary; a second shall include more distant stations .
VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 48 OF 156 e. Results of Station participation in the Interlaboratory Comparison Program, per 6.6.3. f. Discussion of deviations from the Station's environmental sampling schedule per Attachment 20 or 21. g. Discussion of analyses in which the lower limit of detection (LLD) required by Attachment 24 or*25 was not achievable.  
VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 48 OF 156 e. Results of Station participation in the Interlaboratory Comparison Program, per 6.6.3. f. Discussion of deviations from the Station's environmental sampling schedule per Attachment 20 or 21. g. Discussion of analyses in which the lower limit of detection (LLD) required by Attachment 24 or*25 was not achievable.
: 6. 7 .2 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report a. Requirement Radioactive Effluent Release Reports covering operation of the units during the previous 12 months of operation shall be submitted before May 1 of each year. A single submittal may be made for the Station and should combine those sections that are common to both units. Radioactive Effluent Release Reports shall include: 1. A summary of quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents and solid waste released.
: 6. 7 .2 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report a. Requirement Radioactive Effluent Release Reports covering operation of the units during the previous 12 months of operation shall be submitted before May 1 of each year. A single submittal may be made for the Station and should combine those sections that are common to both units. Radioactive Effluent Release Reports shall include: 1. A summary of quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents and solid waste released.
Data shall be summarized on a quarterly basis following the format of Regulatory*
Data shall be summarized on a quarterly basis following the format of Regulatory*
Line 666: Line 666:
* Unplanned releases as determined by Radiation Protection Supervision, which may or may not require a Deviation Report *   
* Unplanned releases as determined by Radiation Protection Supervision, which may or may not require a Deviation Report *   
* *
* *
* VIRGJNIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 .PAGE 49 OF 156 6.7.2 -Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report (continued)  
* VIRGJNIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 .PAGE 49 OF 156 6.7.2 -Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report (continued)
: 4. Major changes to radioactive liquid, gaseous, and solid waste treatm~nt systems during the reporting period. 5. Changes-to VPAP-2103, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (see 6.7.4). 6. A listing of new locations for dose calculations or environmental monitoring identified by the land use census (see 6.6.2). b. Dose Assessment  
: 4. Major changes to radioactive liquid, gaseous, and solid waste treatm~nt systems during the reporting period. 5. Changes-to VPAP-2103, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (see 6.7.4). 6. A listing of new locations for dose calculations or environmental monitoring identified by the land use census (see 6.6.2). b. Dose Assessment
: 1. Radiation dose to individuals due to radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents from the Station during the previous calendar year shall either be calculated in accordance with this procedure or in accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.109. Population doses shall not be included in dose assessments.  
: 1. Radiation dose to individuals due to radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents from the Station during the previous calendar year shall either be calculated in accordance with this procedure or in accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.109. Population doses shall not be included in dose assessments.
: 2. The dose to the maximum exposed member of the public due to radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents from the Station shall be incorporated with the dose assessment performed above. If the dose to the maximum exposed member of the public exceeds twice the limits of 6.2.3.a. l, 6.2.3.a.2, 6.3.3.a.1, or 6.3.4.a.1, the dose assessment shall include the contribution from direct radiation . NOTE: NUREG-0543 states: "There is reasonable assurance that sites with up to four operating reactors that have releases within Appendix I design objective values are also in conformance with the EPA Urani&#xb5;m Fuel Cycle Standard, 40 CFR Part 190." 3. Meteorological conditions during the previous calendar year or historical annual average atmospheric dispersion conditions shall be used to determine*
: 2. The dose to the maximum exposed member of the public due to radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents from the Station shall be incorporated with the dose assessment performed above. If the dose to the maximum exposed member of the public exceeds twice the limits of 6.2.3.a. l, 6.2.3.a.2, 6.3.3.a.1, or 6.3.4.a.1, the dose assessment shall include the contribution from direct radiation . NOTE: NUREG-0543 states: "There is reasonable assurance that sites with up to four operating reactors that have releases within Appendix I design objective values are also in conformance with the EPA Urani&#xb5;m Fuel Cycle Standard, 40 CFR Part 190." 3. Meteorological conditions during the previous calendar year or historical annual average atmospheric dispersion conditions shall be used to determine*
gaseous pathway doses. 6. 7.3 Annual Meteorological Data a. Meteorological data collected during the previous year shall be in the form of joint frequency distributions of ~ind speed, wind direction, and atmospheric stability.  
gaseous pathway doses. 6. 7.3 Annual Meteorological Data a. Meteorological data collected during the previous year shall be in the form of joint frequency distributions of ~ind speed, wind direction, and atmospheric stability.
: b. Meteorological data shall be retained in a file on site and shall be made available to NRC upon request.
: b. Meteorological data shall be retained in a file on site and shall be made available to NRC upon request.
VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103.
VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103.
REVISION 6 PAGE 50 OF 156 6.7.4 Changes to the ODCM Changes to the ODCM shall be: a. Reviewed and approved by SNSOC and the Station Manager before implementation.  
REVISION 6 PAGE 50 OF 156 6.7.4 Changes to the ODCM Changes to the ODCM shall be: a. Reviewed and approved by SNSOC and the Station Manager before implementation.
: b. Documented.
: b. Documented.
Records of reviews shall be retained as Station records. Documentation shall include: 1. Sufficient information to support changes, together with appropriate analyses or evaluations justifying changes. 2. A determination that a change will not adversely impact the accuracy or *reliability of effluent doses or setpoint calculations, and will maintain the level of radioactive effluent control required by:
Records of reviews shall be retained as Station records. Documentation shall include: 1. Sufficient information to support changes, together with appropriate analyses or evaluations justifying changes. 2. A determination that a change will not adversely impact the accuracy or *reliability of effluent doses or setpoint calculations, and will maintain the level of radioactive effluent control required by:
Line 680: Line 680:
* 10 CFR 50.36a
* 10 CFR 50.36a
* 10 CFR 50, Appendix I c. Submitted to NRC in the form of a complete, legible copy of the entire ODCM as
* 10 CFR 50, Appendix I c. Submitted to NRC in the form of a complete, legible copy of the entire ODCM as
* a pan of, or concurrent with the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for the period of the report in which any change was made. Each change shall be identified by markings in the margin of the affected pages, clearly indicating the area of the page that was changed, and shall indicate the date (e.g., month/year) the change was implemented.  
* a pan of, or concurrent with the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for the period of the report in which any change was made. Each change shall be identified by markings in the margin of the affected pages, clearly indicating the area of the page that was changed, and shall indicate the date (e.g., month/year) the change was implemented.
: d. Submitted to the Management Safety Review Committee (MSRC) Coordinat?r.  
: d. Submitted to the Management Safety Review Committee (MSRC) Coordinat?r.
[Commitment 3.2.1] e. Submitted to NRC in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports . * * *   
[Commitment 3.2.1] e. Submitted to NRC in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports . * * *   
* *
* *
Line 698: Line 698:
None i ' ' VIRGINIA POWER I Intentionally Blank I VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 52 OF 156 * * *   
None i ' ' VIRGINIA POWER I Intentionally Blank I VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 52 OF 156 * * *   
* *
* *
* VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 1 (Page 1 of 1) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 53 OF 156 Surry Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Instrument Minimum Action Operable Channels 1. GROSS RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM AND AUTOMATIC lERMINATION OF RELEASE (a) Radwru;te Facility Liquid Effluent Line RM-RRM-131 1 1 2. GROSS BETA OR GAMMA RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM BUT NOT PROVIDING AUTOMATIC lERMINATION OF RELEASE (a) Circulating Water Discharge Line Unit 1: 1-SW-RM-120 2 2 Unit 2: 2-SW-RM-220 (b) Component Cooling Service Water Effluent Line l-SW-RM-107A . 4 2 l-SW-RM-107B 1-SW-RM* 107C 1-SW-RM-107D  
* VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 1 (Page 1 of 1) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 53 OF 156 Surry Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Instrument Minimum Action Operable Channels 1. GROSS RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM AND AUTOMATIC lERMINATION OF RELEASE (a) Radwru;te Facility Liquid Effluent Line RM-RRM-131 1 1 2. GROSS BETA OR GAMMA RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM BUT NOT PROVIDING AUTOMATIC lERMINATION OF RELEASE (a) Circulating Water Discharge Line Unit 1: 1-SW-RM-120 2 2 Unit 2: 2-SW-RM-220 (b) Component Cooling Service Water Effluent Line l-SW-RM-107A . 4 2 l-SW-RM-107B 1-SW-RM* 107C 1-SW-RM-107D
: 3. FLOW RA lE MEASUREMENT DEVICES Radwaste Facility Liquid Effluent Line Instrument Loop RLW-153 1 3 ACTION 1: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases shall be suspended.
: 3. FLOW RA lE MEASUREMENT DEVICES Radwaste Facility Liquid Effluent Line Instrument Loop RLW-153 1 3 ACTION 1: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases shall be suspended.
ACTION 2: If the num.ber of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases via.this pathway may continue provided that, at least once per 12 hours, grab samples are collected and analyzed for principal gamma emitters, as defined in Attachment 8, Surry Radioactive Liquid Waste Sampling and Analysis Program. ACTION 3: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases via this pathway shall be suspended .
ACTION 2: If the num.ber of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases via.this pathway may continue provided that, at least once per 12 hours, grab samples are collected and analyzed for principal gamma emitters, as defined in Attachment 8, Surry Radioactive Liquid Waste Sampling and Analysis Program. ACTION 3: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases via this pathway shall be suspended .
Line 709: Line 709:
* *
* *
* VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 3 (Page 1 of 1) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 57 OF 156 Surry Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Surveillance Requirements Channel Description Channel Source Channel
* VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 3 (Page 1 of 1) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 57 OF 156 Surry Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Surveillance Requirements Channel Description Channel Source Channel
* Channel Check Check Calibration Functional , .Test. 1. GROSS RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM AND AUTOMATIC 1ERMINATION OF RELEASE (a) Radwaste Facility Liquid Effluent Line RM-RRM-131 D p R Q 2. GROSS BETA OR GAMMA RADIOACTIV-ITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM BUT NOT PROVIDING AUTO MA TIC 1ERMI-NATION OF RELEASE (a) Circulating Water Discharge Line Unit 1: 1-SW-RM-120 D M R Q Unit 2: 2-SW-RM-220 (b) Component Cooling Service Water Efflu entLine 1-SW-RM-107A D M R Q 1-SW-RM-107B 1-SW-RM-107C 1-SW-RM-107D  
* Channel Check Check Calibration Functional , .Test. 1. GROSS RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM AND AUTOMATIC 1ERMINATION OF RELEASE (a) Radwaste Facility Liquid Effluent Line RM-RRM-131 D p R Q 2. GROSS BETA OR GAMMA RADIOACTIV-ITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM BUT NOT PROVIDING AUTO MA TIC 1ERMI-NATION OF RELEASE (a) Circulating Water Discharge Line Unit 1: 1-SW-RM-120 D M R Q Unit 2: 2-SW-RM-220 (b) Component Cooling Service Water Efflu entLine 1-SW-RM-107A D M R Q 1-SW-RM-107B 1-SW-RM-107C 1-SW-RM-107D
: 3. FLOW RA1E MEASUREMENT DEVICES Radwaste Facility Liquid Effluent Line Instrument Loop RLW-153 DR N/A R N/A VIRGINIA POWER Intentionally Blank VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 58 OF 156 * * **   
: 3. FLOW RA1E MEASUREMENT DEVICES Radwaste Facility Liquid Effluent Line Instrument Loop RLW-153 DR N/A R N/A VIRGINIA POWER Intentionally Blank VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 58 OF 156 * * **   
* *
* *
* VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT4 (Page 1 of 2) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 59 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Surveillance Requirements Channel Description Channel Source Channel Channel Check Check Calibration Functional Test 1. Liquid Radwaste Effluent (a) 1-RM-LW-111,Liquid Radwaste Effluent D D R Q (NOTE 1) Monitor (b) 1-LW-FT-104, Liquid Radwaste Effluent D (NOTE3) Total Flow Measuring Device NIA R Q {c) l-LW-SOV-121, Clarifier Effluent Line NIA NIA R NIA Continuous Composite Sampler and Sampler Flow Monitor {d) I-LW-TK-20, Liquid Waste Effluent D (NOTE9) NIA NIA NiA Sample Vessel {e) l-LW-1130, Liquid Waste Effluent D (NOTE9) NIA NIA NIA Proportional Sample Valve (0 l-RM-SW-108, Service Water System D M R Q (NOTE2) Effluent Monitor (g) l-RM-SW-130, Unit I Circulating Water D M R Q (NOTE2) System Effluent Line Monitor {h) 2-RM-SW-230.
* VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT4 (Page 1 of 2) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 59 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Surveillance Requirements Channel Description Channel Source Channel Channel Check Check Calibration Functional Test 1. Liquid Radwaste Effluent (a) 1-RM-LW-111,Liquid Radwaste Effluent D D R Q (NOTE 1) Monitor (b) 1-LW-FT-104, Liquid Radwaste Effluent D (NOTE3) Total Flow Measuring Device NIA R Q {c) l-LW-SOV-121, Clarifier Effluent Line NIA NIA R NIA Continuous Composite Sampler and Sampler Flow Monitor {d) I-LW-TK-20, Liquid Waste Effluent D (NOTE9) NIA NIA NiA Sample Vessel {e) l-LW-1130, Liquid Waste Effluent D (NOTE9) NIA NIA NIA Proportional Sample Valve (0 l-RM-SW-108, Service Water System D M R Q (NOTE2) Effluent Monitor (g) l-RM-SW-130, Unit I Circulating Water D M R Q (NOTE2) System Effluent Line Monitor {h) 2-RM-SW-230.
Unit 2 Circulating Water D M R Q (NOTE2) System Effluent Line Monitor 2. 'I ank Level lnd1catmg Uev1ce (NOTE6) (a) Refueling Water Storage Tanks Unit I 1-QS-LT-lOOA D (NOTE4) NIA R Q (NOTE 7) 1-QS-LT-lOOB 1-QS-LT-lOOC 1-QS-LT-lOOD Unit 2 2-QS-LT-200A D (NOTE4) NIA R Q (NOTE 7) 2-QS-LT-200B 2-QS-LT-200C 2-QS-LT-200D  
Unit 2 Circulating Water D M R Q (NOTE2) System Effluent Line Monitor 2. 'I ank Level lnd1catmg Uev1ce (NOTE6) (a) Refueling Water Storage Tanks Unit I 1-QS-LT-lOOA D (NOTE4) NIA R Q (NOTE 7) 1-QS-LT-lOOB 1-QS-LT-lOOC 1-QS-LT-lOOD Unit 2 2-QS-LT-200A D (NOTE4) NIA R Q (NOTE 7) 2-QS-LT-200B 2-QS-LT-200C 2-QS-LT-200D
{b) Casing Cooling Storage Tanks Unit I l-RS-LT-103A D (NOTE4) NIA R Q (NOTE 7) 1-RS-LT-103B Unit 2 2-RS-LT-203A D (NOTE4) NIA R Q (NOTE 7) 2-RS-LT-203B (c) PG Water Storage Tanks (NOTE 5) I-BR-LT-l 16A (1-PG-TK-lA)
{b) Casing Cooling Storage Tanks Unit I l-RS-LT-103A D (NOTE4) NIA R Q (NOTE 7) 1-RS-LT-103B Unit 2 2-RS-LT-203A D (NOTE4) NIA R Q (NOTE 7) 2-RS-LT-203B (c) PG Water Storage Tanks (NOTE 5) I-BR-LT-l 16A (1-PG-TK-lA)
D (NOTE4) NIA R Q (NOTE 8) l-BR-LT-116B (1-PG-TK-IB)
D (NOTE4) NIA R Q (NOTE 8) l-BR-LT-116B (1-PG-TK-IB)
Line 719: Line 719:
D (NOTE4) NIA R Q (NOTES) ... 1-BR-LT-112B (l-BR-TK-2B)
D (NOTE4) NIA R Q (NOTES) ... 1-BR-LT-112B (l-BR-TK-2B)
D (NOTE4) NIA R Q (NOTE 8)
D (NOTE4) NIA R Q (NOTE 8)
VIRGINIA POWER ATIACHMENT4 (Page 2 of 2) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 60 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring lilstrumentation Surveillance Requirements NOTE 1: The Channel Functional Test shall demonstrate:  
VIRGINIA POWER ATIACHMENT4 (Page 2 of 2) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 60 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring lilstrumentation Surveillance Requirements NOTE 1: The Channel Functional Test shall demonstrate:
: a. Automatic isolation of this pathway and Control Room alarm annunciation occur if the instrument indicates measured levels above alarm/trip setpoint.  
: a. Automatic isolation of this pathway and Control Room alarm annunciation occur if the instrument indicates measured levels above alarm/trip setpoint.
: b. Alarm annunciation occurs if the instrument controls are not set in "operate" mode. NOTE 2: The Channel Functional Test shall demonstrate that Control Room alarm annunciation occur if any of the following conditions exists: a. Instrument indicates measured levels above the alarm/trip setpoint.  
: b. Alarm annunciation occurs if the instrument controls are not set in "operate" mode. NOTE 2: The Channel Functional Test shall demonstrate that Control Room alarm annunciation occur if any of the following conditions exists: a. Instrument indicates measured levels above the alarm/trip setpoint.
: b. Instrument controls not set in "operate" mode. NOTE 3: Channel Check shall consist of verifying indication of flow during periods of release. Channel Check shall be made at least once per 24 hours on days on which continuous, periodic, or batch releases are made. NOTE 4: Duri~g liquid additions to the tarik, verify indication of level change. NOTE 5: This is a shared system between Unit 1 and Unit 2. NOTE 6: Tanks included in this requirement are those outdoor tanks that are not'surrounded by liners, dikes, or walls capable of holding the tank contents and do not have overflows and surrounding area drains connected to the liquid radwaste treatment system. NOTE 7: The Channel Functional Test shall demonstrate that automatic isolation of this pathway and Control Room alarm annunciation occur if instrument indicates  
: b. Instrument controls not set in "operate" mode. NOTE 3: Channel Check shall consist of verifying indication of flow during periods of release. Channel Check shall be made at least once per 24 hours on days on which continuous, periodic, or batch releases are made. NOTE 4: Duri~g liquid additions to the tarik, verify indication of level change. NOTE 5: This is a shared system between Unit 1 and Unit 2. NOTE 6: Tanks included in this requirement are those outdoor tanks that are not'surrounded by liners, dikes, or walls capable of holding the tank contents and do not have overflows and surrounding area drains connected to the liquid radwaste treatment system. NOTE 7: The Channel Functional Test shall demonstrate that automatic isolation of this pathway and Control Room alarm annunciation occur if instrument indicates  
*measured levels outside the alarm/trip setpoint.
*measured levels outside the alarm/trip setpoint.
Line 742: Line 742:
* *
* *
* VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 65 OF 156 ATTACHMENT 6 (Page 3 of 5) North Anna Liquid Ingestion Pathway Dose Factor Calculation Units I and 2 2.0 Equation (9) Equation (6) is simplified for actual dose calculations by introducing:
* VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 65 OF 156 ATTACHMENT 6 (Page 3 of 5) North Anna Liquid Ingestion Pathway Dose Factor Calculation Units I and 2 2.0 Equation (9) Equation (6) is simplified for actual dose calculations by introducing:
WASTE FLOW . WASTE FLOW F = CIRC. (WATER) FLOW+ WASTE FLOW :::: .CIRC. FLOW and CIRC.FLOW  
WASTE FLOW . WASTE FLOW F = CIRC. (WATER) FLOW+ WASTE FLOW :::: .CIRC. FLOW and CIRC.FLOW
: f. = ----------
: f. = ----------
1 EFFECTIVE DIL. FLOWi (6-4) (6-5) Effective dilution flow rates for individual nuclides "i" are listed on Attachment 7, North Anna Liquid Pathway Dose Commitment Factors for Adults. Then the total released activity (Qj) for the considered period and the ith nuclide is written as: Q. = txC.xWASTEFLOW 1 1 . (6-6) and Equation (6) reduces to: A. D = f' QiEFF. DIL.1 (6-7) For the long-lived, dose controlling nuclides, the effective dilution flow is essentially the over (dam) flow rate out of the Lake Anna system (i.e., the liquid pathway dose is practically independent from the circulating water flow rate. However, to accurately assess long range average effects of reduced circulating water flow rates during outages or periods of low lake water temperatures, calculations are based on an average of 7 out of 8 circulating water pumps running at 218,000 gpm = 485.6 cft/sec per pump .
1 EFFECTIVE DIL. FLOWi (6-4) (6-5) Effective dilution flow rates for individual nuclides "i" are listed on Attachment 7, North Anna Liquid Pathway Dose Commitment Factors for Adults. Then the total released activity (Qj) for the considered period and the ith nuclide is written as: Q. = txC.xWASTEFLOW 1 1 . (6-6) and Equation (6) reduces to: A. D = f' QiEFF. DIL.1 (6-7) For the long-lived, dose controlling nuclides, the effective dilution flow is essentially the over (dam) flow rate out of the Lake Anna system (i.e., the liquid pathway dose is practically independent from the circulating water flow rate. However, to accurately assess long range average effects of reduced circulating water flow rates during outages or periods of low lake water temperatures, calculations are based on an average of 7 out of 8 circulating water pumps running at 218,000 gpm = 485.6 cft/sec per pump .
Line 748: Line 748:
Compared to this, the NAPS UFSAR, Chapter 11.2 (Referen~e 3.1.18), contains an extremely conservative consideration based on the minimum flow in accordance with Reference 3.1.21 with only two Circulating Water pumps operating.
Compared to this, the NAPS UFSAR, Chapter 11.2 (Referen~e 3.1.18), contains an extremely conservative consideration based on the minimum flow in accordance with Reference 3.1.21 with only two Circulating Water pumps operating.
Even at such a low flow rate, which cannot be sustained during power generation, liquid pathway effluent dose factors incre~se only slightly ~or the dose controlling nuclides (i.e., Cs 134 19 percent, Cs 137 15 percent).
Even at such a low flow rate, which cannot be sustained during power generation, liquid pathway effluent dose factors incre~se only slightly ~or the dose controlling nuclides (i.e., Cs 134 19 percent, Cs 137 15 percent).
By defining Bi = Ai/ EFF. DIL. FLOWi, the dose calculation is reduced to a two factor formula: D = ~Q.xB. &#xa3;..i 1 1 i Values for Bi (mrem/Ci) and EFF. DIL. FLOWi are listed in Attachment  
By defining Bi = Ai/ EFF. DIL. FLOWi, the dose calculation is reduced to a two factor formula: D = ~Q.xB. &#xa3;..i 1 1 i Values for Bi (mrem/Ci) and EFF. DIL. FLOWi are listed in Attachment
: 7. (6-8) * * *   
: 7. (6-8) * * *   
* * ** VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 6 (Page 5 of 5)_ VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 67 OF 156 North Anna Liquid Ingestion Pathway Dose Factor Calculation Units 1 and 2 Individual Dilution Total Body Bi Liver Bi Radionuclide Multiplication Factor mrem/hr mrem/hr (fi) &#xb5;Ci/ml &#xb5;Ci/ml H-3 14.9 6.18E+OO 6.18E+OO Na-24 1.0 3.71E+Ol 3.71E+Ol Cr-51 1.7 1.lOE+OO -Mn-54 7.0 8.62E+02 4.52E+03 Fe-55 11.3 l.30E+02 5.56E+02 Fe-59 2.2 9.47E+02 2.47E+03 Co-58 2.8 2.49E+02 1.11E+02 Co-60 13.3 8.27E+02 3.75E+02 Zn-65 6.1 3.28E+04 7.25E+04 Rb-86 1.5 3.53E+04 7.59E+04 Sr-89 2.3 8.70E+02 -Sr-90 15.8 2.39E+05 -Y-91 2.5 3.42E-01 -Zr-95 2.7 2.98E-01 4.41E-01 Zr-97 1.0 150E-04 3.27E-04 Nb-95 1.9 1.13E+02 2.10E+02 Mo-99 1.0 7.48E+OO 3.93E+Ol Ru-103 2.0 4.lOE+OO -Ru-106 7.6 2.65E+Ol -Ag-llOm 6.2 4.94E+OO 8.32E+OO Sb-124 2.6 4.37E+Ol 2.08E+OO Sb-125 11.4 2.46E+Ol 1.16E+OO Te-125m 2.5 3.23E+02 8.73E+02 Te-127m 3.7 7.82E+02 2.29E+03 Te-129m 1.9 1.52E+03 3.58E+03 Te-131m 1.0 1.12E+02 1.35E+02 Te-132 1.0 5.04E+02 5.37E+02 1-131 1.2 9.66E+Ol 1.69E+02 1-132 1.0 1.03E-01 2.95E-01 1-133 1.0 3.47E+OO 1.14E+Ol I-134 1.0 2.15E-02 6.00E-02 I-135 1.0 6.58E-01 1.78E+OO Cs-134 10.3 5.80E+05 7.09E+05 Cs-136 1.3 6.01E+04 8.35E+04 Cs-137 15.8 3.45E+05 5.26E+05 Cs-138 1.0 9.18E-01 1.85E-f00 Ba-140 1.3 2.65E+Ol 5.08E-Ol La-140 1.0 4.47E-03 1.69E-02 Ce-141 1.8 2.14E-02 1.89E-01 Ce-143 1.0 1.35E-04 1*.22E+OO Ce-144 6.6 1.41E+OO 1.lOE+Ol Np-239 1.0 5.13E-04 9.31E-04 VIRGINIA POWER Intentionally Blank VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 68 OF 156 * * *   
* * ** VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 6 (Page 5 of 5)_ VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 67 OF 156 North Anna Liquid Ingestion Pathway Dose Factor Calculation Units 1 and 2 Individual Dilution Total Body Bi Liver Bi Radionuclide Multiplication Factor mrem/hr mrem/hr (fi) &#xb5;Ci/ml &#xb5;Ci/ml H-3 14.9 6.18E+OO 6.18E+OO Na-24 1.0 3.71E+Ol 3.71E+Ol Cr-51 1.7 1.lOE+OO -Mn-54 7.0 8.62E+02 4.52E+03 Fe-55 11.3 l.30E+02 5.56E+02 Fe-59 2.2 9.47E+02 2.47E+03 Co-58 2.8 2.49E+02 1.11E+02 Co-60 13.3 8.27E+02 3.75E+02 Zn-65 6.1 3.28E+04 7.25E+04 Rb-86 1.5 3.53E+04 7.59E+04 Sr-89 2.3 8.70E+02 -Sr-90 15.8 2.39E+05 -Y-91 2.5 3.42E-01 -Zr-95 2.7 2.98E-01 4.41E-01 Zr-97 1.0 150E-04 3.27E-04 Nb-95 1.9 1.13E+02 2.10E+02 Mo-99 1.0 7.48E+OO 3.93E+Ol Ru-103 2.0 4.lOE+OO -Ru-106 7.6 2.65E+Ol -Ag-llOm 6.2 4.94E+OO 8.32E+OO Sb-124 2.6 4.37E+Ol 2.08E+OO Sb-125 11.4 2.46E+Ol 1.16E+OO Te-125m 2.5 3.23E+02 8.73E+02 Te-127m 3.7 7.82E+02 2.29E+03 Te-129m 1.9 1.52E+03 3.58E+03 Te-131m 1.0 1.12E+02 1.35E+02 Te-132 1.0 5.04E+02 5.37E+02 1-131 1.2 9.66E+Ol 1.69E+02 1-132 1.0 1.03E-01 2.95E-01 1-133 1.0 3.47E+OO 1.14E+Ol I-134 1.0 2.15E-02 6.00E-02 I-135 1.0 6.58E-01 1.78E+OO Cs-134 10.3 5.80E+05 7.09E+05 Cs-136 1.3 6.01E+04 8.35E+04 Cs-137 15.8 3.45E+05 5.26E+05 Cs-138 1.0 9.18E-01 1.85E-f00 Ba-140 1.3 2.65E+Ol 5.08E-Ol La-140 1.0 4.47E-03 1.69E-02 Ce-141 1.8 2.14E-02 1.89E-01 Ce-143 1.0 1.35E-04 1*.22E+OO Ce-144 6.6 1.41E+OO 1.lOE+Ol Np-239 1.0 5.13E-04 9.31E-04 VIRGINIA POWER Intentionally Blank VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 68 OF 156 * * *   
Line 760: Line 760:
* 2.22E+06
* 2.22E+06
* Y
* Y
* e-(11.At)  
* e-(11.At)
(8-1) Where: LLD = the "a priori" (before the fact) Lower Limit of Detection (as microcuries per unit mass or volume) (see 4.8) Sb = the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (as counts per minute, cpm) E = the counting efficiency (as counts per disintegration)
(8-1) Where: LLD = the "a priori" (before the fact) Lower Limit of Detection (as microcuries per unit mass or volume) (see 4.8) Sb = the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (as counts per minute, cpm) E = the counting efficiency (as counts per disintegration)
V = the sample size (in units of mass or volume) 2.22E+o6 = the number of disintegrations per minute (dpm) per microcurie Y = the fractional radiochemical yield (when applicable) . A. * = the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide At = the elapsed time between the midpoint of sample collection and time of counting Typical values of E, V, Y and At should be used in the calculation.
V = the sample size (in units of mass or volume) 2.22E+o6 = the number of disintegrations per minute (dpm) per microcurie Y = the fractional radiochemical yield (when applicable) . A. * = the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide At = the elapsed time between the midpoint of sample collection and time of counting Typical values of E, V, Y and At should be used in the calculation.
Line 796: Line 796:
NOTE 7: Whenever the secondary coolant activity exceeds 10-s &#xb5;Ci/ml, the turbine building sump pumps shall be placed in manual operation and samples shall be taken and analyzed prior to release. Secondary coolant activity samples shall be collected and analyzed on a weekly basis. These samples are analyzed for gross activity or gamma isotopic activity within 24 hours .
NOTE 7: Whenever the secondary coolant activity exceeds 10-s &#xb5;Ci/ml, the turbine building sump pumps shall be placed in manual operation and samples shall be taken and analyzed prior to release. Secondary coolant activity samples shall be collected and analyzed on a weekly basis. These samples are analyzed for gross activity or gamma isotopic activity within 24 hours .
VIRGINIA POWER I Intentionally Blank r VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 78 OF 156 * * *   
VIRGINIA POWER I Intentionally Blank r VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 78 OF 156 * * *   
* * ** VIRGJNIA POWER ATTACHMENT IO (Page 1 of 5) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 79 OF 156 Surry Radioactive Gaseous Waste Sampling and Analysis Program Gaseous Release Sampling Minimum Type of Activity Lower Limit of Type Frequency Analysis Analysis Detection (LLD) Frequency  
* * ** VIRGJNIA POWER ATTACHMENT IO (Page 1 of 5) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 79 OF 156 Surry Radioactive Gaseous Waste Sampling and Analysis Program Gaseous Release Sampling Minimum Type of Activity Lower Limit of Type Frequency Analysis Analysis Detection (LLD) Frequency
(&#xb5;Ci/ml), (Note 1) A. Waste Gas Prior to Release Prior to Release Principal Gamma (Each Tanlc) 1 x 10-4 Storage Tank (Grab Sample) (Each Tank) Emitters (Note 2) Prior to Release Prior to Release Principle Gamma 1 x 10-4 B. Containment Emitters (Note 2) Purge (Each PURGE) (Each PURGE) H3 1 x 10-6 (Grab Sample) C. Ventilation Weekly Weekly Principle Gamma 1 X 10-4 (l)Process Vent (Grab Sample) Emitters (Note 2) (2)Vent Vent#l H3 (3)Vent Vent#2 (Note 3) (Note 3) 1 x 10-6 (4)SRF Vent Continuous Weekly (Note 5) 1131 1 X 10-12 (Note 4) (Charcoal.Sample) 1133 1 X 10-lO Continuous Weekly (Note 5) Principal Gamma 1 X 10-ll All Release (Note 4) Particulate Sample Emitter (Note 2) Continuous Weekly Types.as listed (Note 4) Composite Gross Alpha 1 X 10-ll Particulate Sample in A, B, and C Continuous Quarterly Composite Sr 89 and Sr 90 1 X 10-ll (Note 4) Particulate Continuous Noble Gas Noble Gases Gross 1 X 10-6 . (Note 4) Monitor Beta and Gamma Weekly Weekly Principle Gamma 1 X 10-4 Condenser Air Emitters (Note 2) Ejector Grab Sample (Note 3) H3 1 X 10-6 (Note 3)
(&#xb5;Ci/ml), (Note 1) A. Waste Gas Prior to Release Prior to Release Principal Gamma (Each Tanlc) 1 x 10-4 Storage Tank (Grab Sample) (Each Tank) Emitters (Note 2) Prior to Release Prior to Release Principle Gamma 1 x 10-4 B. Containment Emitters (Note 2) Purge (Each PURGE) (Each PURGE) H3 1 x 10-6 (Grab Sample) C. Ventilation Weekly Weekly Principle Gamma 1 X 10-4 (l)Process Vent (Grab Sample) Emitters (Note 2) (2)Vent Vent#l H3 (3)Vent Vent#2 (Note 3) (Note 3) 1 x 10-6 (4)SRF Vent Continuous Weekly (Note 5) 1131 1 X 10-12 (Note 4) (Charcoal.Sample) 1133 1 X 10-lO Continuous Weekly (Note 5) Principal Gamma 1 X 10-ll All Release (Note 4) Particulate Sample Emitter (Note 2) Continuous Weekly Types.as listed (Note 4) Composite Gross Alpha 1 X 10-ll Particulate Sample in A, B, and C Continuous Quarterly Composite Sr 89 and Sr 90 1 X 10-ll (Note 4) Particulate Continuous Noble Gas Noble Gases Gross 1 X 10-6 . (Note 4) Monitor Beta and Gamma Weekly Weekly Principle Gamma 1 X 10-4 Condenser Air Emitters (Note 2) Ejector Grab Sample (Note 3) H3 1 X 10-6 (Note 3)
VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 10 (Page 2 of 5) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 80 OF 156 Surry Radioactive Gaseous Waste Sampling arid Analysis Program Gaseous Release *sampling Minimum Type of Activity Lower Limit of Type Frequency Analysis Analysis Detection (LLD) Frequency*  
VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 10 (Page 2 of 5) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 80 OF 156 Surry Radioactive Gaseous Waste Sampling arid Analysis Program Gaseous Release *sampling Minimum Type of Activity Lower Limit of Type Frequency Analysis Analysis Detection (LLD) Frequency*
(&#xb5;Ci/ml), (Note 1) Prior to Release Prior to Release Principle Gamma 1 X 10-4 Emitters (Grab Sample) (Each Release) H3 1 X 1.0*6 Continuous Charcoal Sample 1131 1 X 10-ll (Note 4) (Note 6) 1133 1 X 10*10 Containment Hog Depres-Continuous Particulate Principal Gamma 1 X 10-lO (Note 4) Sample (Note 6) Emitter (Note 2) surization . Composite Continuous Particulate Gross Alpha 1 X 10-lO (Note 4) Sample (Note 6)
(&#xb5;Ci/ml), (Note 1) Prior to Release Prior to Release Principle Gamma 1 X 10-4 Emitters (Grab Sample) (Each Release) H3 1 X 1.0*6 Continuous Charcoal Sample 1131 1 X 10-ll (Note 4) (Note 6) 1133 1 X 10*10 Containment Hog Depres-Continuous Particulate Principal Gamma 1 X 10-lO (Note 4) Sample (Note 6) Emitter (Note 2) surization . Composite Continuous Particulate Gross Alpha 1 X 10-lO (Note 4) Sample (Note 6)
* Continuous Composite Sr 89 and Sr 90 1 X 10-lO (Note 4) Particulate Sample (Note 6) --------* *
* Continuous Composite Sr 89 and Sr 90 1 X 10-lO (Note 4) Particulate Sample (Note 6) --------* *
Line 827: Line 827:
VIRGINIA POWER I Intentionally Blank I VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 84 OF 156 * * *   
VIRGINIA POWER I Intentionally Blank I VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 84 OF 156 * * *   
* *
* *
* VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 11 (Page 1 of 4) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 -PAGE 85 OF 156 North Anna Radioacth:*e Gaseous Waste Sampling and Analysis Program* Gaseous Release Sampling Minimum Type of Activity Lower Limit of Type Frequency Analysis Analysis Detection (LLD) Frequency  
* VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 11 (Page 1 of 4) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 -PAGE 85 OF 156 North Anna Radioacth:*e Gaseous Waste Sampling and Analysis Program* Gaseous Release Sampling Minimum Type of Activity Lower Limit of Type Frequency Analysis Analysis Detection (LLD) Frequency
(&#xb5;Ci/ml), (Note I) A. Waste Gas Prior to Release Prior to Release Principal Gamma (Each Tanlc 1 X 10-4 Storage Tank . Grab Sample) (Each Tanlc) Emitters (Note 2) Prior to Release Prior to Release Principle Gamma 1 X 10-4 B. Containment Emitters (Note 2) Purge (Each PURGE (Each PURGE) H3 1 X 10-6 Grab Sample) C. Ventilation Monthly Monthly Principle Gamma 1 X 10-4 ( 1) Process Vent (Grab Sample) Emitters (Note 2) (2) Vent Vent A (Notes 3, 4, and (Note 3) H3 1 x 10-6 (3) Vent Vent B 5) Continuous Weekly 1131 1 X 10-12 (Note 4) (Charcoal Sample) 1133 1 X 10-lO Continuous Weekly Principal Gamma 1 X 10-ll All Releas~ (Note 4) Particulate Sample Emitter (Note 2) Continuous Monthly 1 X 10-ll Types .as listed (Note 4) Composite Gross Alpha Particulate Sample in A, B, and C Continuous Quarterly Composite Sr 89 and Sr 90 1 X 10-ll (Note 4) Particulate Continuous Noble Gas Noble Gases Gross 1 X 10-6 (Note 4) Monitor Beta or Gamma Condenser Air Weekly . Weekly Principle Gamma 1 X 10-4 Ejector/Steam Emitters (Note 7) Generator Grab Sampie H3 1 X 10-6 Blowdown Vent (Note 6) Containment.
(&#xb5;Ci/ml), (Note I) A. Waste Gas Prior to Release Prior to Release Principal Gamma (Each Tanlc 1 X 10-4 Storage Tank . Grab Sample) (Each Tanlc) Emitters (Note 2) Prior to Release Prior to Release Principle Gamma 1 X 10-4 B. Containment Emitters (Note 2) Purge (Each PURGE (Each PURGE) H3 1 X 10-6 Grab Sample) C. Ventilation Monthly Monthly Principle Gamma 1 X 10-4 ( 1) Process Vent (Grab Sample) Emitters (Note 2) (2) Vent Vent A (Notes 3, 4, and (Note 3) H3 1 x 10-6 (3) Vent Vent B 5) Continuous Weekly 1131 1 X 10-12 (Note 4) (Charcoal Sample) 1133 1 X 10-lO Continuous Weekly Principal Gamma 1 X 10-ll All Releas~ (Note 4) Particulate Sample Emitter (Note 2) Continuous Monthly 1 X 10-ll Types .as listed (Note 4) Composite Gross Alpha Particulate Sample in A, B, and C Continuous Quarterly Composite Sr 89 and Sr 90 1 X 10-ll (Note 4) Particulate Continuous Noble Gas Noble Gases Gross 1 X 10-6 (Note 4) Monitor Beta or Gamma Condenser Air Weekly . Weekly Principle Gamma 1 X 10-4 Ejector/Steam Emitters (Note 7) Generator Grab Sampie H3 1 X 10-6 Blowdown Vent (Note 6) Containment.
Prior to Release Prior to each Principle Gamma 1 X 10-4 Vacuum Steam Emitters (Note 2) Ejector (Hogger) (Grab Sample) Release H3 1 X 10-6 (Note 8)
Prior to Release Prior to each Principle Gamma 1 X 10-4 Vacuum Steam Emitters (Note 2) Ejector (Hogger) (Grab Sample) Release H3 1 X 10-6 (Note 8)
Line 869: Line 869:
* *
* *
* VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 14 (Page 1 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 97 OF 156 Surry Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation MINIMUM INSTRUMENT OPERABLE ACTION CHANNELS 1. PROCESS VENT SYSTEM '(a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor -Providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release 1-GW-RM-102 1 1 1-GW-RM-130-1 (b) Iodine Sampler Process Vent Continuous HP Sampler, or 1-GW-RM-130-1 1 2 (c) Particulate Sampler Process Vent Continuous HP Sampler, or 1 2 1-GW-RM-130-1 (d) Process Vent Flow Rate Monitor 1-GW-FT-100 1 3 (e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device KAMAN Flow Rate Measuring Device 1 3 (Parameter  
* VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 14 (Page 1 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 97 OF 156 Surry Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation MINIMUM INSTRUMENT OPERABLE ACTION CHANNELS 1. PROCESS VENT SYSTEM '(a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor -Providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release 1-GW-RM-102 1 1 1-GW-RM-130-1 (b) Iodine Sampler Process Vent Continuous HP Sampler, or 1-GW-RM-130-1 1 2 (c) Particulate Sampler Process Vent Continuous HP Sampler, or 1 2 1-GW-RM-130-1 (d) Process Vent Flow Rate Monitor 1-GW-FT-100 1 3 (e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device KAMAN Flow Rate Measuring Device 1 3 (Parameter  
#19), or HP Sampler Rotometer  
#19), or HP Sampler Rotometer
: 2. CONDENSER AIR EJECTOR SYSTEM (a) Gross Activity Monitor 1-SV-RM-111 2 ( one per unit) 1 . 2-SV-RM-211 (b) Air Ejector Flow Rate Measuring Device Unit 1: 1-VP-FI-IA 1-VP-FI-IB 2 ( one per unit) 3 Unit 2: 2-VP-FI-IA 2-VP-FI-IB  
: 2. CONDENSER AIR EJECTOR SYSTEM (a) Gross Activity Monitor 1-SV-RM-111 2 ( one per unit) 1 . 2-SV-RM-211 (b) Air Ejector Flow Rate Measuring Device Unit 1: 1-VP-FI-IA 1-VP-FI-IB 2 ( one per unit) 3 Unit 2: 2-VP-FI-IA 2-VP-FI-IB
: 3. VENTILATION VENT SYSTEM (a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor SRF: RRM-101 1 1 SPS: Vent#l 1-VG-RM-104 1 1 Vent #2,.1-VG-RM  
: 3. VENTILATION VENT SYSTEM (a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor SRF: RRM-101 1 1 SPS: Vent#l 1-VG-RM-104 1 1 Vent #2,.1-VG-RM  
-110, or 1 1 1-VG-RM-131-1 VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 14 (Page 2 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 98 OF 156 Surry Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation MINIMUM INSTRUMENT OPERABLE ACTION CHANNELS (b) Iodine Sampler SRF: RRM-101 1 2 SPS: Vent #1, 1-VG-RM-104 1 2 Vent #2, Continuous HP Sampler, or 1 2 1-VG-RM-131-1 (c) Particulate Sampler SRF: RRM.:101 1 2 SPS: Vent#l, VG-RM-104 1 2 Vent #2, HP Continuous Sampler, or 1 2 1-VG-RM-131-1 (d) Ventilation Vent Flow Rate Monitor SRF: 01-RHV-Ff-156 1 3 SPS: Vent#l, 1-VS-FI'-119 1 3 Vent#2, 1-VS-Ff-116 1 3 (e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device SRF: RRM-101 1 3 SPS: Vent#l, 1-VG-RM-104 1 3 V ~nt #2, KAMAN Flow Rate Measuring Device 1 3 (Parameter  
-110, or 1 1 1-VG-RM-131-1 VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 14 (Page 2 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 98 OF 156 Surry Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation MINIMUM INSTRUMENT OPERABLE ACTION CHANNELS (b) Iodine Sampler SRF: RRM-101 1 2 SPS: Vent #1, 1-VG-RM-104 1 2 Vent #2, Continuous HP Sampler, or 1 2 1-VG-RM-131-1 (c) Particulate Sampler SRF: RRM.:101 1 2 SPS: Vent#l, VG-RM-104 1 2 Vent #2, HP Continuous Sampler, or 1 2 1-VG-RM-131-1 (d) Ventilation Vent Flow Rate Monitor SRF: 01-RHV-Ff-156 1 3 SPS: Vent#l, 1-VS-FI'-119 1 3 Vent#2, 1-VS-Ff-116 1 3 (e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device SRF: RRM-101 1 3 SPS: Vent#l, 1-VG-RM-104 1 3 V ~nt #2, KAMAN Flow Rate Measuring Device 1 3 (Parameter  
Line 876: Line 876:
* *
* *
* VIRGINIA POWER
* VIRGINIA POWER
* VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 99 OF 156 * *** ATTACHMENT 14 . (Page 3 of 3) Surry Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation ACTION 1: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases via this path may continue provided grab samples are taken at least once per 12 hours and ~hese samples are analyzed for gross activity within 24 hours. ACTION 2: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases via the effected path may continue provided samples are continuously collected within one hour with auxiliary sampling equipment as required in Attachment  
* VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 99 OF 156 * *** ATTACHMENT 14 . (Page 3 of 3) Surry Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation ACTION 1: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases via this path may continue provided grab samples are taken at least once per 12 hours and ~hese samples are analyzed for gross activity within 24 hours. ACTION 2: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases via the effected path may continue provided samples are continuously collected within one hour with auxiliary sampling equipment as required in Attachment
: 10. ACTION 3: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided the flow rate is estimated at least once per 4 hours .
: 10. ACTION 3: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided the flow rate is estimated at least once per 4 hours .
VIRGINIA POWER Intentionally Blank VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 100 OF 156 * * *   
VIRGINIA POWER Intentionally Blank VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 100 OF 156 * * *   
* *
* *
* VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 15 (Page 1 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 101 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation INSTRUMENT MINIMUM ACTION OPERABLE CHANNELS 1. PROCESS VENT SYSTEM (a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor 1-RM-GW-102 1 2,4 1-RM-GW-178-1 (b) Iodine Sampler 1-RM-GW-178-1 1 2,5 Process Vent Continuous HP Sampler (c) Particulate Sampler l-RM-GW-178-1 1 2,5 Process Vent Continuous HP Sampler (d) Total Flow Monitor 1-GW-Ff-108 1 1 (e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device KAMANS Flow Rate Measuring Device (Parameter  
* VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 15 (Page 1 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 101 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation INSTRUMENT MINIMUM ACTION OPERABLE CHANNELS 1. PROCESS VENT SYSTEM (a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor 1-RM-GW-102 1 2,4 1-RM-GW-178-1 (b) Iodine Sampler 1-RM-GW-178-1 1 2,5 Process Vent Continuous HP Sampler (c) Particulate Sampler l-RM-GW-178-1 1 2,5 Process Vent Continuous HP Sampler (d) Total Flow Monitor 1-GW-Ff-108 1 1 (e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device KAMANS Flow Rate Measuring Device (Parameter
: 19) 1 1 HP Sampler Rotarneter  
: 19) 1 1 HP Sampler Rotarneter  
' 2. CONDENSER AIR EJECTOR SYSTEM (a) Gross Activity Monitor Unit 1 1-SV-RM-121 1 3 Unit 2 2-SV-RM-221 (b) Flow Rate Measuring Device Unit l 1-SV-FI-lOOA 1-SV-:FI-lOlA 1 (NOTE 1) 1 1-SV-FI-lOOB 1-SV-FI-lOlB Unit2 2-SV-Fl-200A 2-SV-FI-201A 2-SV-FI-200B 1 (NOTE 2) 1 2-SV-Fl-201B VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 15 (Page 2 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 102 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation MINIMUM INSTRUMENT OPERABLE.
' 2. CONDENSER AIR EJECTOR SYSTEM (a) Gross Activity Monitor Unit 1 1-SV-RM-121 1 3 Unit 2 2-SV-RM-221 (b) Flow Rate Measuring Device Unit l 1-SV-FI-lOOA 1-SV-:FI-lOlA 1 (NOTE 1) 1 1-SV-FI-lOOB 1-SV-FI-lOlB Unit2 2-SV-Fl-200A 2-SV-FI-201A 2-SV-FI-200B 1 (NOTE 2) 1 2-SV-Fl-201B VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 15 (Page 2 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 102 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation MINIMUM INSTRUMENT OPERABLE.
ACTION CHANNELS 3. VENTILATION VENT A (a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor 1-RM-VG-104 1 2 1-RM-VG-179-1 (b) Iodine Sampler 1-RM-VG-179-1 1 2 Vent Vent A Continuous~
ACTION CHANNELS 3. VENTILATION VENT A (a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor 1-RM-VG-104 1 2 1-RM-VG-179-1 (b) Iodine Sampler 1-RM-VG-179-1 1 2 Vent Vent A Continuous~
Sampler (c) Particulate Sampler 1-RM-VG-179-1 1 2 Vent Vent A Continuous HP Sampler (d) Total Flow Monitor 1-HV-Ff-1212A 1 1 (e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device KAMANS Flow Rate Measuring Device (Parameter  
Sampler (c) Particulate Sampler 1-RM-VG-179-1 1 2 Vent Vent A Continuous HP Sampler (d) Total Flow Monitor 1-HV-Ff-1212A 1 1 (e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device KAMANS Flow Rate Measuring Device (Parameter
: 19) 1 1 HP Sampler Rotameter  
: 19) 1 1 HP Sampler Rotameter
: 4. VENTILATION VENT B (a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor 1-RM-VG-113 1 *2 l-RM-VG-180-1 (b) Iodine Sampler 1-RM-VG-180-1 1 2 Vent Vent B Continuous HP Sampler (c) Particulate Sampler 1-RM-VG-180-1 1 2 Vent Vent B Continuous HP Sampler (d) Total Flow Monitor 1-HV-Ff-1212B L 1 (e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device KAMANS Flow Rate Measuring Device (Parameter  
: 4. VENTILATION VENT B (a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor 1-RM-VG-113 1 *2 l-RM-VG-180-1 (b) Iodine Sampler 1-RM-VG-180-1 1 2 Vent Vent B Continuous HP Sampler (c) Particulate Sampler 1-RM-VG-180-1 1 2 Vent Vent B Continuous HP Sampler (d) Total Flow Monitor 1-HV-Ff-1212B L 1 (e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device KAMANS Flow Rate Measuring Device (Parameter
: 19) 1 1 HP Sampler Rotameter  
: 19) 1 1 HP Sampler Rotameter  
* * *   
* * *   
** * ** VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 15 (Page 3 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 103 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation ACTION 1: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases, via this path, may continue if the flow rate is estimated at least once per four hours. ACTION 2: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases, via this path, may continue if grab samples are taken at least once per 12 hours and these samples are analyzed for gross activity or gamma isotopic activity within 24 hours. ACTION 3: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases, via this path, may continue if the frequency of the grab samples provided by Technical Specification requirement 4.4.6.3.b is increased to at least once per four hours and these samples are analyzed for gross activity or gamma isotopic activity within eight hours. ACTION 4: If the number of operable channels is less than required, the contents of the Waste Gas Decay Tanks may be released to the environment provided that prior to initiation of the release: a. At least two independent samples of the tank's contents are analyzed, and: b. At least two technically qualified members of the Station staff independently verify the release rate calculations and discharge valve lineup. ACTION 5: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases from the Waste Gas Decay Tank may continue provided samples are continuously collected with auxiliary sampling equipment as required in Attachment  
** * ** VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 15 (Page 3 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 103 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation ACTION 1: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases, via this path, may continue if the flow rate is estimated at least once per four hours. ACTION 2: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases, via this path, may continue if grab samples are taken at least once per 12 hours and these samples are analyzed for gross activity or gamma isotopic activity within 24 hours. ACTION 3: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases, via this path, may continue if the frequency of the grab samples provided by Technical Specification requirement 4.4.6.3.b is increased to at least once per four hours and these samples are analyzed for gross activity or gamma isotopic activity within eight hours. ACTION 4: If the number of operable channels is less than required, the contents of the Waste Gas Decay Tanks may be released to the environment provided that prior to initiation of the release: a. At least two independent samples of the tank's contents are analyzed, and: b. At least two technically qualified members of the Station staff independently verify the release rate calculations and discharge valve lineup. ACTION 5: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases from the Waste Gas Decay Tank may continue provided samples are continuously collected with auxiliary sampling equipment as required in Attachment
: 11. NOTE 1: A channel shall consist of: a. The flow instrument installed in the ejector through which the discharge is routed; . eitherTr~nA (1-SV-FI-lOOA, 101A), or Train B (1-SV-FI-lOOB, 101B) or both. b. Flow instruments 101 A and 101 B provide low range measurement Flow instruments 1 OOA and 1 OOB provide high range measurement.
: 11. NOTE 1: A channel shall consist of: a. The flow instrument installed in the ejector through which the discharge is routed; . eitherTr~nA (1-SV-FI-lOOA, 101A), or Train B (1-SV-FI-lOOB, 101B) or both. b. Flow instruments 101 A and 101 B provide low range measurement Flow instruments 1 OOA and 1 OOB provide high range measurement.
NOTE 2: A channel shall consist of: . a. The flow instrument installed in the ejector through which the discharge is routed; either Train A (2-SV-FI-200A, 201A), or Train B (2-SV-FI-200B, 201B) or both .
NOTE 2: A channel shall consist of: . a. The flow instrument installed in the ejector through which the discharge is routed; either Train A (2-SV-FI-200A, 201A), or Train B (2-SV-FI-200B, 201B) or both .
Line 897: Line 897:
VEN! SY.:HEM (a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor -Providing Alam1 and Automatic Termination of Release l-GW-RM-102 D M,
VEN! SY.:HEM (a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor -Providing Alam1 and Automatic Termination of Release l-GW-RM-102 D M,
* R Q 1-GW-RM-130-1 (b) Iodine Sampler Process Vent Continuous HP Sampler, or 1-GW-RM-130-1 w NIA NIA NIA (c) Particulate Sampler Process Vent Continuous HP Sampler, or 1-GW-RM-130-1 w NIA NIA NIA (d) *Process Vent Flow Rate Monitor 1-GW-FT-100 D NIA R NIA (e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device HP Sampler Rotometer, or D NIA SA NIA KAMAN Flow Rate Measuring D NIA R NIA Device (Parameter  
* R Q 1-GW-RM-130-1 (b) Iodine Sampler Process Vent Continuous HP Sampler, or 1-GW-RM-130-1 w NIA NIA NIA (c) Particulate Sampler Process Vent Continuous HP Sampler, or 1-GW-RM-130-1 w NIA NIA NIA (d) *Process Vent Flow Rate Monitor 1-GW-FT-100 D NIA R NIA (e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device HP Sampler Rotometer, or D NIA SA NIA KAMAN Flow Rate Measuring D NIA R NIA Device (Parameter  
#19) 2. CONDENSER AIR EJECTOR SYSTEN. (a} Gross Activity Monitor Unit 1: 1-SV-RM-111 D M R Q Unit 2:. 2-SV-RM-21 l (b) Air Ejector Flow Rate Measuring Device Unit 1: I-VP-FI-IA 1-VP-FI-IB D NIA R NIA Unit 2: 2~VP-FI-1A 2-VP-FI-IB  
#19) 2. CONDENSER AIR EJECTOR SYSTEN. (a} Gross Activity Monitor Unit 1: 1-SV-RM-111 D M R Q Unit 2:. 2-SV-RM-21 l (b) Air Ejector Flow Rate Measuring Device Unit 1: I-VP-FI-IA 1-VP-FI-IB D NIA R NIA Unit 2: 2~VP-FI-1A 2-VP-FI-IB
: 3. VENTILATION VENT SYSTEM (a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor SRF: RRM-101 SPS: 1-VG-RM-110 D M R Q I-VG-RM -131-1 VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 16 (Page 2 of2) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 106 OF 156 Surry Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Surveillance Requirements CHANNEL CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL DESCRIPTION CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION TEST (b) Iodine Sampler SRF: RRM-101 ,SPS: Vent#l, 1-VG-RM-104 Vent #2, Continuous HP w NIA NIA NIA Sampler, or 1-VG-RM-131-1 (c)
: 3. VENTILATION VENT SYSTEM (a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor SRF: RRM-101 SPS: 1-VG-RM-110 D M R Q I-VG-RM -131-1 VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 16 (Page 2 of2) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 106 OF 156 Surry Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Surveillance Requirements CHANNEL CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL DESCRIPTION CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION TEST (b) Iodine Sampler SRF: RRM-101 ,SPS: Vent#l, 1-VG-RM-104 Vent #2, Continuous HP w NIA NIA NIA Sampler, or 1-VG-RM-131-1 (c)
* Particulate Sampler SRF: RRM-101 SPS: Vent#l, 1-VG-RM-104 Vent #2, Continuous HP w NIA NIA NIA Sampler, or 1-VG-RM-131-1 (d) Ventilation Vent Flow Rate Monitor SRF: 01-RHV-Ff-156 SPS: Vent#l, 1-VS-Ff-119 D NIA R NIA Vent#2, 1-VS-Ff-116 (e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device SRF: RRM-101 D NIA R NIA SPS: Vent#l, 1-VG-RM-104 D NIA R NIA
* Particulate Sampler SRF: RRM-101 SPS: Vent#l, 1-VG-RM-104 Vent #2, Continuous HP w NIA NIA NIA Sampler, or 1-VG-RM-131-1 (d) Ventilation Vent Flow Rate Monitor SRF: 01-RHV-Ff-156 SPS: Vent#l, 1-VS-Ff-119 D NIA R NIA Vent#2, 1-VS-Ff-116 (e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device SRF: RRM-101 D NIA R NIA SPS: Vent#l, 1-VG-RM-104 D NIA R NIA
Line 903: Line 903:
19), or HP D NIA NIA Sampler Rotometer SIA "' t'I'lOr to each waste uas J.Jeca 1 ank re1ease y * * *   
19), or HP D NIA NIA Sampler Rotometer SIA "' t'I'lOr to each waste uas J.Jeca 1 ank re1ease y * * *   
* *
* *
* VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 17 (Page 1 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 107 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Surveillance Requirements CHANNEL CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL CHANNEL DESCRIPTION CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION FUNCTIONAL TEST 1. PROCESS VENT SYSTEM (a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor l-RM-GW-102 D M(NOTE5) R Q (NOTE l) l-RM-GW-178-1 D M(NOTE5) R Q (NOTE l) (b) Iodine Sampler 1-RM-GW-178-1 w NIA NIA NIA Process Vent Continuous HP Sampler D (NOTE 3) NIA NIA NIA (c) Particulate Sampler 1-RM-GW-178-1 w NIA NIA NIA Process Vent Continuous HP Sampler D(NOTE3) NIA NIA NIA (d) Total Flow Monitor 1-GW-Ff-108 D NIA R Q (e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device KAMANS Flow Rate Measuring D (NOTE 3) NIA R NIA Device (Parameter  
* VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 17 (Page 1 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 107 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Surveillance Requirements CHANNEL CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL CHANNEL DESCRIPTION CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION FUNCTIONAL TEST 1. PROCESS VENT SYSTEM (a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor l-RM-GW-102 D M(NOTE5) R Q (NOTE l) l-RM-GW-178-1 D M(NOTE5) R Q (NOTE l) (b) Iodine Sampler 1-RM-GW-178-1 w NIA NIA NIA Process Vent Continuous HP Sampler D (NOTE 3) NIA NIA NIA (c) Particulate Sampler 1-RM-GW-178-1 w NIA NIA NIA Process Vent Continuous HP Sampler D(NOTE3) NIA NIA NIA (d) Total Flow Monitor 1-GW-Ff-108 D NIA R Q (e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device KAMANS Flow Rate Measuring D (NOTE 3) NIA R NIA Device (Parameter
: 19) HP Sampler Rotameter D(NOTE3) NIA SA NIA 2. CONDENSER AIR EJECTOR SYSTEM (a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor Unit 1 l-SV-RM-121 D M R Q (NOTE 1) Unit 2 2-SV-RM-221 (b) Flow Rate Measuring Device Unit l 1-SV-FI-lOOA 1-SV-Fl-lOlA.
: 19) HP Sampler Rotameter D(NOTE3) NIA SA NIA 2. CONDENSER AIR EJECTOR SYSTEM (a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor Unit 1 l-SV-RM-121 D M R Q (NOTE 1) Unit 2 2-SV-RM-221 (b) Flow Rate Measuring Device Unit l 1-SV-FI-lOOA 1-SV-Fl-lOlA.
D NIA R NIA 1-SV-FI-lOOB 1-SV-FI-lOlB  
D NIA R NIA 1-SV-FI-lOOB 1-SV-FI-lOlB  
Line 909: Line 909:
* 2-SV-FI-20 IA D NIA R NIA 2-SV-FI-200B 2-SV-FI-201B
* 2-SV-FI-20 IA D NIA R NIA 2-SV-FI-200B 2-SV-FI-201B
* VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 17 (Page 2 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 108 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation  
* VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 17 (Page 2 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 108 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation  
*Surveillance Requirements CHANNEL CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL CHANNEL DESCRIPTION CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION FUNCTIONAL TEST 3. VENTILATION VENT A (a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor 1-RM-VG-104 D M R Q (NOTE2) 1-RM-VG-179-1 D M(NOTE5) R Q(NOTE2) (b) Iodine Sampler 1-RM-VG-179-1 w NIA NIA NIA Vent Vent A Continuous HP Sampler D (NOTE 3) NIA NIA NIA (c) Particulate Sampler 1-RM-VG-179-1 w NIA NIA NIA Vent Vent A-Continuous HP Sampler D(NOTE3) NIA NIA NIA (d) Total :flow Monitor l-HV-Ff-1212A . D NIA R Q (e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device KAMANS Flow Rate Measuring D (NOTE 3) NIA R .NIA Device (Parameter  
*Surveillance Requirements CHANNEL CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL CHANNEL DESCRIPTION CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION FUNCTIONAL TEST 3. VENTILATION VENT A (a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor 1-RM-VG-104 D M R Q (NOTE2) 1-RM-VG-179-1 D M(NOTE5) R Q(NOTE2) (b) Iodine Sampler 1-RM-VG-179-1 w NIA NIA NIA Vent Vent A Continuous HP Sampler D (NOTE 3) NIA NIA NIA (c) Particulate Sampler 1-RM-VG-179-1 w NIA NIA NIA Vent Vent A-Continuous HP Sampler D(NOTE3) NIA NIA NIA (d) Total :flow Monitor l-HV-Ff-1212A . D NIA R Q (e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device KAMANS Flow Rate Measuring D (NOTE 3) NIA R .NIA Device (Parameter
: 19) HP Sampler Rotameter D(NOTE3) NIA SA NIA 4. VENTILATION VENT B (a) Noble.Gas Activity Monitor 1-RM-V0-113 D M R Q (NOTE4) 1-RM-VG-180-1 D M(NOTE5) R Q (NOTE2) (b) Iodine Sampler l-RM-VG-180-1 w NIA NIA,. NIA Vent Vent B Continuous HP Sampler D (NOTE 3) NIA .. NIA NIA (c) Particulate Sampler 1-RM-VG-180-1 w NIA NIA NIA Vent Vent B Continuous HP Sampler D(NOTE3) NIA NIA NIA (d) Total Flow Monitor 1-HV-Ff-1212B D NIA R Q -(e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring  
: 19) HP Sampler Rotameter D(NOTE3) NIA SA NIA 4. VENTILATION VENT B (a) Noble.Gas Activity Monitor 1-RM-V0-113 D M R Q (NOTE4) 1-RM-VG-180-1 D M(NOTE5) R Q (NOTE2) (b) Iodine Sampler l-RM-VG-180-1 w NIA NIA,. NIA Vent Vent B Continuous HP Sampler D (NOTE 3) NIA .. NIA NIA (c) Particulate Sampler 1-RM-VG-180-1 w NIA NIA NIA Vent Vent B Continuous HP Sampler D(NOTE3) NIA NIA NIA (d) Total Flow Monitor 1-HV-Ff-1212B D NIA R Q -(e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring  
-Device KAMANS Flow Rate Measuring D (NOTE 3) NIA R NIA . Device (Parameter  
-Device KAMANS Flow Rate Measuring D (NOTE 3) NIA R NIA . Device (Parameter
: 19) HP Sampler Rotameter D (NOTE 3) NIA SA NIA * * *   
: 19) HP Sampler Rotameter D (NOTE 3) NIA SA NIA * * *   
* *
* *
* VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 17 (Page 3 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 109 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitor.ing InstrumentationSurveillance
* VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 17 (Page 3 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 109 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitor.ing InstrumentationSurveillance
* Requirements NOTE 1: The Channel Functional Test shall demonstrate:  
* Requirements NOTE 1: The Channel Functional Test shall demonstrate:
: a. Automatic actuation of the valves in this pathway and Control Room alarm . annunciation occur if the instrument indicates measured levels above the alann/trip setpoint.  
: a. Automatic actuation of the valves in this pathway and Control Room alarm . annunciation occur if the instrument indicates measured levels above the alann/trip setpoint.
: b. Alarm annunciation occurs if the instrument controls not set in "operate" mode. NOTE 2: The Channel Functional Test shall demonstrate:  
: b. Alarm annunciation occurs if the instrument controls not set in "operate" mode. NOTE 2: The Channel Functional Test shall demonstrate:
: a. Control Room alarm annunciation occurs if the instrument indicates measured levels are above the alann/trip setpoint.  
: a. Control Room alarm annunciation occurs if the instrument indicates measured levels are above the alann/trip setpoint.
: b. Alarm annunciation occurs if the instrument controls not set in "operate" mode. NOTE 3: Channel Checks shall consist of verifying indication of flow during periods of release . Channel Checks shall be made at least once per 24 hours on days on which continuous, periodic, or batch releases are made. NOTE 4: The Channel Functional Test shall demonstrate that: a. Control Room alarm annunciation occurs if the instrument indicates measured levels are above alann/trip setpoint b. The Instrument mode selection control automatically resets to "operate" mode when released.
: b. Alarm annunciation occurs if the instrument controls not set in "operate" mode. NOTE 3: Channel Checks shall consist of verifying indication of flow during periods of release . Channel Checks shall be made at least once per 24 hours on days on which continuous, periodic, or batch releases are made. NOTE 4: The Channel Functional Test shall demonstrate that: a. Control Room alarm annunciation occurs if the instrument indicates measured levels are above alann/trip setpoint b. The Instrument mode selection control automatically resets to "operate" mode when released.
NOTE 5: Monitors 1-RM-GW-178-1, 1-RM-VG-179-1, and 1-RM-VG-180-1 are electronically source checked using an LED .
NOTE 5: Monitors 1-RM-GW-178-1, 1-RM-VG-179-1, and 1-RM-VG-180-1 are electronically source checked using an LED .
Line 941: Line 941:
If there are none, then 1 sample from milking animals in each of 3 areas a) Mille between 5 to 8 km where Monthly at all Gamma isotopic (NOTE 5) (NOTE 7) doses are calculated to be times and 1 131 analysis monthly greater than 1 mrem per yr (NOTE 6) b) 1 sample from milking animals at a control location (15-30 km in the least prevalent wind direction) a) 1 sample of commercially and recreationally important species (bass, sunfish, catfish) b) Fish and* in vicinity of plant discharge Semiannually Gamma isotopic on edible Invertebrates area portions b) 1 sample of same species in areas not influenced by plant discharge a) Samples of an edible broaq leaf vegetation grown nearest each of two different off site locations of highest predicted historical annual average Monthly if -c) Food ground level 0/Q if millc Gamma isotopic (NOTE 5) Products sampling is not performed available, or and 1 131 analysis b) I sample of broad leaf at.harvest . -** vegetation grown 15-30 km in the least prevalent wind -direction if millc sampling is not performed VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 21 (Page 4 of 5) VPAP-2103.
If there are none, then 1 sample from milking animals in each of 3 areas a) Mille between 5 to 8 km where Monthly at all Gamma isotopic (NOTE 5) (NOTE 7) doses are calculated to be times and 1 131 analysis monthly greater than 1 mrem per yr (NOTE 6) b) 1 sample from milking animals at a control location (15-30 km in the least prevalent wind direction) a) 1 sample of commercially and recreationally important species (bass, sunfish, catfish) b) Fish and* in vicinity of plant discharge Semiannually Gamma isotopic on edible Invertebrates area portions b) 1 sample of same species in areas not influenced by plant discharge a) Samples of an edible broaq leaf vegetation grown nearest each of two different off site locations of highest predicted historical annual average Monthly if -c) Food ground level 0/Q if millc Gamma isotopic (NOTE 5) Products sampling is not performed available, or and 1 131 analysis b) I sample of broad leaf at.harvest . -** vegetation grown 15-30 km in the least prevalent wind -direction if millc sampling is not performed VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 21 (Page 4 of 5) VPAP-2103.
REVISION 6 PAGE 122 OF 156 North Anna Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program NOTE 1: The number, media, frequency, and location of samples may vary from site to site. This table presents an acceptable minimum program for a site at which each entry is applicable.
REVISION 6 PAGE 122 OF 156 North Anna Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program NOTE 1: The number, media, frequency, and location of samples may vary from site to site. This table presents an acceptable minimum program for a site at which each entry is applicable.
Local site characteristics must be examined to determine if pathways not covered by this table may significantly contribute to an individual's dose and be included in the sampling program. NOTE 2: For each and every sample location in Attachment 21, specific parameters of distance and direction sector from the centerline of the reactor, and additional description where pertinent, shall be provided in Attachment  
Local site characteristics must be examined to determine if pathways not covered by this table may significantly contribute to an individual's dose and be included in the sampling program. NOTE 2: For each and every sample location in Attachment 21, specific parameters of distance and direction sector from the centerline of the reactor, and additional description where pertinent, shall be provided in Attachment
: 23. Refer to Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Positions and to NUREG-0133, Preparation of Radiological Effluent Technical Specifi~ations for Nuclear Power Plant. Deviations are permitted from the required sampling schedule if specimens are unattainable due to hazardous conditions, seasorial unavailability, malfunction of automatic sampling equipment and other legitimate reasons.
: 23. Refer to Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Positions and to NUREG-0133, Preparation of Radiological Effluent Technical Specifi~ations for Nuclear Power Plant. Deviations are permitted from the required sampling schedule if specimens are unattainable due to hazardous conditions, seasorial unavailability, malfunction of automatic sampling equipment and other legitimate reasons.
* If specimens are unattainable due to sampling equipment malfunction, every effort shall be
* If specimens are unattainable due to sampling equipment malfunction, every effort shall be
Line 951: Line 951:
The 36 stations are not an absolute number. The number of direct radiation monitoring stations may be reduced according to geographical -limitations, e.g., at an ocean site, some sectors will be over water so that the number of dosimeters may be reduced accordingly.
The 36 stations are not an absolute number. The number of direct radiation monitoring stations may be reduced according to geographical -limitations, e.g., at an ocean site, some sectors will be over water so that the number of dosimeters may be reduced accordingly.
The frequency of analysis or readout for TLD systems will depend upon the characteristics of the specific systei:n used and should be selected to obtain optimum dose information with minimal fading. NOTE 4: Airborne particulate sample filters shall be analyzed for gross beta radioactivity 24 hours or more after sampling to allow for radon and thoron daughter decay. If gross beta activity in air particulate samples is greater than ten times the yearly mean of control samples, gamma isotopic analysis shall be performed on the individual samples. NOTE 5: Gamma isotopic analysis is the identification and quantj.fication of gamma-emitting radionuclides that may be attributable to effluents from the facility.
The frequency of analysis or readout for TLD systems will depend upon the characteristics of the specific systei:n used and should be selected to obtain optimum dose information with minimal fading. NOTE 4: Airborne particulate sample filters shall be analyzed for gross beta radioactivity 24 hours or more after sampling to allow for radon and thoron daughter decay. If gross beta activity in air particulate samples is greater than ten times the yearly mean of control samples, gamma isotopic analysis shall be performed on the individual samples. NOTE 5: Gamma isotopic analysis is the identification and quantj.fication of gamma-emitting radionuclides that may be attributable to effluents from the facility.
NOTE 6: The dose shall be calculated for the maximum organ and age group, using the methodology and parameters in the ODCM. NOTE 7: If milk sampling cannot be performed, use item 4.c (Page 3 of 5, Attachment  
NOTE 6: The dose shall be calculated for the maximum organ and age group, using the methodology and parameters in the ODCM. NOTE 7: If milk sampling cannot be performed, use item 4.c (Page 3 of 5, Attachment
: 21)
: 21)
VIRGINIA POWER Intentionally Blank **, VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 124 OF 156 * * *   
VIRGINIA POWER Intentionally Blank **, VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 124 OF 156 * * *   
* * ** VIRGINIA POWER *sAMPLE MEDIA Air Charcoal and Particulate Environmental TLDs ATTACHMENT 22 (Page 1 of 4) Surry Environmental Sampling Locations LOCATION DISTANCE DIRECTION (MR.ES) Surry Station (SS) b.37 NNE Hog Island Reserve (HIR) 2.0 NNE Bacons Castle (BC) 4.5 SSW Alliance (ALL) 5.1 WSW Colonial Parkway (CP) 3.7 NNW Dow .Chemical  
* * ** VIRGINIA POWER *sAMPLE MEDIA Air Charcoal and Particulate Environmental TLDs ATTACHMENT 22 (Page 1 of 4) Surry Environmental Sampling Locations LOCATION DISTANCE DIRECTION (MR.ES) Surry Station (SS) b.37 NNE Hog Island Reserve (HIR) 2.0 NNE Bacons Castle (BC) 4.5 SSW Alliance (ALL) 5.1 WSW Colonial Parkway (CP) 3.7 NNW Dow .Chemical  
.. (DOW) 5.1 ENE Fort Eustis (FE) 4.8 ESE Newport News (NN) 16.5 ESE Control (00) West North West (02) 0.17 WNW Surry Station Discharge 0.6 NW (03) North North West (04) 0.4 NNW North (05) 0.29 N North North East (06) 0.28 NNE North East (07) 0.31 NE East North East (08) 0.43 ENE East (Exclusion)  
.. (DOW) 5.1 ENE Fort Eustis (FE) 4.8 ESE Newport News (NN) 16.5 ESE Control (00) West North West (02) 0.17 WNW Surry Station Discharge 0.6 NW (03) North North West (04) 0.4 NNW North (05) 0.29 N North North East (06) 0.28 NNE North East (07) 0.31 NE East North East (08) 0.43 ENE East (Exclusion)
(09) 0.31 E West (10) 0.40 w West South West (11) 0.45 WSW South West (12) .0.30 SW South South West (13) 0.43 SSW South (14) 0.48 s South South East (15) 0.74 SSE South East (16) 1.00 SE East (17) 0.57 E Station Intake (18) 1.23 ESE Hog Island Reserve (19) 1.94 .NNE VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 1250F 156 REMARKS Site Boundary Location at Sector with Highest D/Q Control Location Onsite ** Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Onsite Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Near Resident VIRGINIA POWER SAMPLE MEDIA Environmental TLDs Milk ATTACHMENT 22 (Page 2 of 4) Surry Environmental  
(09) 0.31 E West (10) 0.40 w West South West (11) 0.45 WSW South West (12) .0.30 SW South South West (13) 0.43 SSW South (14) 0.48 s South South East (15) 0.74 SSE South East (16) 1.00 SE East (17) 0.57 E Station Intake (18) 1.23 ESE Hog Island Reserve (19) 1.94 .NNE VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 1250F 156 REMARKS Site Boundary Location at Sector with Highest D/Q Control Location Onsite ** Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Onsite Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Near Resident VIRGINIA POWER SAMPLE MEDIA Environmental TLDs Milk ATTACHMENT 22 (Page 2 of 4) Surry Environmental  
*sampling Locations LOCATION DISTANCE DIRECTION (MILES) Bacons Castle (20) 4.45 SSW Route 633 (21) 3.5 SW Alliance (22) 5.1 WSW Surry (23) 8.0 WSW Route 636 and 637 (24) 4.0 w Scotland Wharf (25) 5.0 WNW Jamestown (26) 6.3 NW Colonial Parkway (27) 3.7 NNW Route 617 and 618 (28) 5.2 NNW Kingsmill (29) 4.8 N Williamsburg (30) 7.8 N Kingsmill North (31) 5.6 NNE Budweiser (32) 5.7 NNE Water Plant (33) 4.8 NE Dow (34) 5.1 ENE Lee Hall (35) 7.1 ENE Goose Island (36) 5.0 E Fort Eustis (37) 4.8 ESE Newport News (38) 16.5 ESE James River Bridge (39) 14.8 SSE Benn's Church (40) 14.5 s Smithfield (41) 11.5 s Rushmere (42) 5.2 SSE Route 628 (43) 5.0 s Epp's 4.8 SSW Colonial Parkway 3.7 NNW Judkin's 6.i SSW -William's 22.5 s VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 126 OF 156 REMARKS Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Population Center Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Population Center Approx. 5 miles Population Center Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Population Center Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Population Center Control Control Control Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Control Location * * *   
*sampling Locations LOCATION DISTANCE DIRECTION (MILES) Bacons Castle (20) 4.45 SSW Route 633 (21) 3.5 SW Alliance (22) 5.1 WSW Surry (23) 8.0 WSW Route 636 and 637 (24) 4.0 w Scotland Wharf (25) 5.0 WNW Jamestown (26) 6.3 NW Colonial Parkway (27) 3.7 NNW Route 617 and 618 (28) 5.2 NNW Kingsmill (29) 4.8 N Williamsburg (30) 7.8 N Kingsmill North (31) 5.6 NNE Budweiser (32) 5.7 NNE Water Plant (33) 4.8 NE Dow (34) 5.1 ENE Lee Hall (35) 7.1 ENE Goose Island (36) 5.0 E Fort Eustis (37) 4.8 ESE Newport News (38) 16.5 ESE James River Bridge (39) 14.8 SSE Benn's Church (40) 14.5 s Smithfield (41) 11.5 s Rushmere (42) 5.2 SSE Route 628 (43) 5.0 s Epp's 4.8 SSW Colonial Parkway 3.7 NNW Judkin's 6.i SSW -William's 22.5 s VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 126 OF 156 REMARKS Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Population Center Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Population Center Approx. 5 miles Population Center Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Population Center Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Population Center Control Control Control Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Control Location * * *   
Line 1,026: Line 1,026:
* * *   
* * *   
* * ** VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 26 (Page 1 of 1) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 137 OF 156 Reporting Levels for Radioactivity Concentrations in Environmental Samples at Surry Water Airborne Fish Milk Food Products Analysis (pCi/1) Particulate or (pCi/kg, wet) (pCi/1) * (pCi/kg, wet) Gases (pCi/m3) H-3 30,000 Mn-54 1,000 30,000 Fe-59 400 10,000 Co-58 1,000 30,000 Co-60 300 10,000 Zn-65 300 20,000 Zr-Nb-95 400 I-131 (NOTE 1) 2 0.9 3 100 Cs-134 30 . 10 1,000 60 1,000*
* * ** VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 26 (Page 1 of 1) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 137 OF 156 Reporting Levels for Radioactivity Concentrations in Environmental Samples at Surry Water Airborne Fish Milk Food Products Analysis (pCi/1) Particulate or (pCi/kg, wet) (pCi/1) * (pCi/kg, wet) Gases (pCi/m3) H-3 30,000 Mn-54 1,000 30,000 Fe-59 400 10,000 Co-58 1,000 30,000 Co-60 300 10,000 Zn-65 300 20,000 Zr-Nb-95 400 I-131 (NOTE 1) 2 0.9 3 100 Cs-134 30 . 10 1,000 60 1,000*
* Cs-137 ~o 20 2,000 70 2,000 Ba-La-140 200 300 NOTE 1: Reporting level for the ground (drinking) water samples required by Attachment  
* Cs-137 ~o 20 2,000 70 2,000 Ba-La-140 200 300 NOTE 1: Reporting level for the ground (drinking) water samples required by Attachment
: 20. The reporting level for the surface (non-drinking) water samples required by Attachment 20 is 20 pCi/1 .
: 20. The reporting level for the surface (non-drinking) water samples required by Attachment 20 is 20 pCi/1 .
VIRGINIA .. POWER Intentionally Blank VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 138 OF 156 * * *   
VIRGINIA .. POWER Intentionally Blank VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 138 OF 156 * * *   
Line 1,066: Line 1,066:
*equivalent.
*equivalent.
The gamma and beta dose factors Kivv, Livv, Mivv, and Nivv in Attachment 12 were obtained by performing a units conversion of the appropriate dose factors from Table B-1, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1, to mrem/yr per Cijm3 or mrad/yr per Ci/m3, and multiplying by the ventilation vent site boundary X/Q value of 6.0E-05 sec/m3. The same approach was used to calculate the gamma and beta dose factors Kipv, Lipv, Mipv, and Nipv in Attachment 12, using the process vent site boundary X/Q value of 1.0E-06 sec/m3. In~alation pathway dose factors Pivv and Pipv in Attachment 12 were calculated using the equation:
The gamma and beta dose factors Kivv, Livv, Mivv, and Nivv in Attachment 12 were obtained by performing a units conversion of the appropriate dose factors from Table B-1, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1, to mrem/yr per Cijm3 or mrad/yr per Ci/m3, and multiplying by the ventilation vent site boundary X/Q value of 6.0E-05 sec/m3. The same approach was used to calculate the gamma and beta dose factors Kipv, Lipv, Mipv, and Nipv in Attachment 12, using the process vent site boundary X/Q value of 1.0E-06 sec/m3. In~alation pathway dose factors Pivv and Pipv in Attachment 12 were calculated using the equation:
Pi = K' (BR) DFAi (x/Q)(mrem/yr per Curie/sec)  
Pi = K' (BR) DFAi (x/Q)(mrem/yr per Curie/sec)
(28-1) where: K' = a constant of unit conversion, 1 E+ 12 pCi/Ci BR = the breathing rate of the child age group, 3700 m 3 /yr, from Table E-5, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev .1 DF Ai = the thyroid organ inhalation dose factor for child age group for the ith radionuclide, in'mrem/pCi, from Table E-9, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1 X/Q = the ventilation vent site boundary X/Q, 6.0E-5 sec/m3, or the process vent site boundary X/Q, 1.0E-06 se.c/m3, as appropriate VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 28 (Page 6 of 8) VPAP-2103 . REVISION 6 PAGE 146 OF 156 Surry Meteorological, Liquid, and Gaseous Pathway Analysis Step 6.3.4.a., requires that the dose to the maximum exposed member of the public from 1 131 ,* 1 133 , tritium, and from all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days be less than or equal to the specified limits. Dose calculations were performed for an exp.osed member of the public within site boundary unrestricted areas, discharge canal bank, and to an exposed member of the public beyond site boundary at real residences with the largest X/Q values using the NRC computer code GASPAR. Doses to members of the public were also calculated for the vegetable garden, meat animal, and milk-cow pathways with the largest D/Q
(28-1) where: K' = a constant of unit conversion, 1 E+ 12 pCi/Ci BR = the breathing rate of the child age group, 3700 m 3 /yr, from Table E-5, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev .1 DF Ai = the thyroid organ inhalation dose factor for child age group for the ith radionuclide, in'mrem/pCi, from Table E-9, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1 X/Q = the ventilation vent site boundary X/Q, 6.0E-5 sec/m3, or the process vent site boundary X/Q, 1.0E-06 se.c/m3, as appropriate VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 28 (Page 6 of 8) VPAP-2103 . REVISION 6 PAGE 146 OF 156 Surry Meteorological, Liquid, and Gaseous Pathway Analysis Step 6.3.4.a., requires that the dose to the maximum exposed member of the public from 1 131 ,* 1 133 , tritium, and from all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days be less than or equal to the specified limits. Dose calculations were performed for an exp.osed member of the public within site boundary unrestricted areas, discharge canal bank, and to an exposed member of the public beyond site boundary at real residences with the largest X/Q values using the NRC computer code GASPAR. Doses to members of the public were also calculated for the vegetable garden, meat animal, and milk-cow pathways with the largest D/Q
* values using the NRC computer code GASPAR. It was determined that the member of the public within site boundary would be using the
* values using the NRC computer code GASPAR. It was determined that the member of the public within site boundary would be using the
Line 1,080: Line 1,080:
VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT28 (Page 8 of 8) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 148 OF 156 Surry Meteorological,*
VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT28 (Page 8 of 8) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 148 OF 156 Surry Meteorological,*
Liquid, and Gaseous Pathway Analysis Since the concentration of tritium in milk is based on the airborne concentration rather than the d_epositi.on, the following equation is used: (28-3) where: K"' = a constant of unit conversion 1E+03 gm/kg H = absolute humidity of the atmosphere, 8.0, grn/m3 0.75 = the fraction of total feed that is water 0.5 = the ratio of the specific activity of the feed grass to the atmospheric water X/Q = the annual average concentration at a location 5150 meters S sector, 3.0E-07 sec/m3 for ventilation vent releases, and l.3E-07 sec/m3 for the process vent releases Other parameters have been previously defined. The inhalation pathway dose factors Rlivv and Riipv in Attachment 18 were calculated using the following equation:
Liquid, and Gaseous Pathway Analysis Since the concentration of tritium in milk is based on the airborne concentration rather than the d_epositi.on, the following equation is used: (28-3) where: K"' = a constant of unit conversion 1E+03 gm/kg H = absolute humidity of the atmosphere, 8.0, grn/m3 0.75 = the fraction of total feed that is water 0.5 = the ratio of the specific activity of the feed grass to the atmospheric water X/Q = the annual average concentration at a location 5150 meters S sector, 3.0E-07 sec/m3 for ventilation vent releases, and l.3E-07 sec/m3 for the process vent releases Other parameters have been previously defined. The inhalation pathway dose factors Rlivv and Riipv in Attachment 18 were calculated using the following equation:
where: K' = BR = DFAi = XIQ = ' Rii = K (BR) DFA/x/Q) (mrem/yr per Curie/sec)  
where: K' = BR = DFAi = XIQ = ' Rii = K (BR) DFA/x/Q) (mrem/yr per Curie/sec)
(28-4) a constant of unit conversion, IE+ 12 pCi/Ci breathing rate of the infant age group, 1400 m3/yr, from Table E-5, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev.I thyroid organ inhalation dose factor for infant age group for the ith radionuclide, in mrern/pCi, from Table E-10, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev.I ventilation vent X/Q, 3.0E-07 sec/m3, or the process vent site boundary X/Q, l.3E-07 sec/m3, at a location 5150 meters S sector. * * *   
(28-4) a constant of unit conversion, IE+ 12 pCi/Ci breathing rate of the infant age group, 1400 m3/yr, from Table E-5, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev.I thyroid organ inhalation dose factor for infant age group for the ith radionuclide, in mrern/pCi, from Table E-10, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev.I ventilation vent X/Q, 3.0E-07 sec/m3, or the process vent site boundary X/Q, l.3E-07 sec/m3, at a location 5150 meters S sector. * * *   
* * ** VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 29 (Page 1 of 8) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 149 OF 156 North Anna Meteorological, Liquid, and Gaseous Pathway Analysis 1.0 METEOROLOGICAL ANALYSIS 1.1
* * ** VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 29 (Page 1 of 8) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 149 OF 156 North Anna Meteorological, Liquid, and Gaseous Pathway Analysis 1.0 METEOROLOGICAL ANALYSIS 1.1
Line 1,101: Line 1,101:
* VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 29 (Page 5 of 8) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 153 OF 156 North Anna Meteorological, Liquid, and Gaseous Pathway .Analysis Step 6.3.1.a.2 dose limits apply specifically to the inhalation pathway. Therefore, the locations and X/Q values determined for maximum rioble gas doses can be used to determine the maximum dose from I 131 , I 133 , tritium, and for all radionuclides in particulate fonp with lives greater than 8 days for the inhalation pathway. The NRC computer code GASPAR, "Evaluation of Atmospheric Releases," Revised 8/19/77, was run using 1979, 1980 and 1981 North Anna Power Station Gaseous Effluent Release
* VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 29 (Page 5 of 8) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 153 OF 156 North Anna Meteorological, Liquid, and Gaseous Pathway .Analysis Step 6.3.1.a.2 dose limits apply specifically to the inhalation pathway. Therefore, the locations and X/Q values determined for maximum rioble gas doses can be used to determine the maximum dose from I 131 , I 133 , tritium, and for all radionuclides in particulate fonp with lives greater than 8 days for the inhalation pathway. The NRC computer code GASPAR, "Evaluation of Atmospheric Releases," Revised 8/19/77, was run using 1979, 1980 and 1981 North Anna Power Station Gaseous Effluent Release
* Report data. Doses from I 131 , I 133 , tritium, and particulates for the inhalation pathway were calculated using the 9.3E-06 sec/m3 site boundary 'X/Q. Except for the source term data and the 'X/Q value, computer code default parameters were used. Results for each year indicated that the critical age group was the child and the critical organ was the thyroid for the inhalation pathway. The gamma and beta dose factors Kivv, Livv; Mivv, and Nivv in Attachment 13 were obtained by performing a units conversion of the appropriate dose factors from Table B-1, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1, to mrem/yr per Ci/m3 or mrad/yr per Ci/m3, and multiplying by the ventilation vent site boundary 'X/Q value of 9.3E-06 sec/m3. The same approach was used in calculating the gamma and beta dose factors Kipv, Lipv, Mipv, and Nipv in Attachment 13 using .the process vent site boundary 'X/Q value of 1.2E-06 sec/m3. The inhalation pathway dose factors Pivv and Pipv in Attachment 13 were calculated using the following equation:
* Report data. Doses from I 131 , I 133 , tritium, and particulates for the inhalation pathway were calculated using the 9.3E-06 sec/m3 site boundary 'X/Q. Except for the source term data and the 'X/Q value, computer code default parameters were used. Results for each year indicated that the critical age group was the child and the critical organ was the thyroid for the inhalation pathway. The gamma and beta dose factors Kivv, Livv; Mivv, and Nivv in Attachment 13 were obtained by performing a units conversion of the appropriate dose factors from Table B-1, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1, to mrem/yr per Ci/m3 or mrad/yr per Ci/m3, and multiplying by the ventilation vent site boundary 'X/Q value of 9.3E-06 sec/m3. The same approach was used in calculating the gamma and beta dose factors Kipv, Lipv, Mipv, and Nipv in Attachment 13 using .the process vent site boundary 'X/Q value of 1.2E-06 sec/m3. The inhalation pathway dose factors Pivv and Pipv in Attachment 13 were calculated using the following equation:
where: K' = BR = DFAi = 'X/Q = Pi = K'(BR) DFAi (x/Q) (mrem/yr per Curie/sec)  
where: K' = BR = DFAi = 'X/Q = Pi = K'(BR) DFAi (x/Q) (mrem/yr per Curie/sec)
(29-1) a constant of unit conversion, 1 E+ 12 pCi/Ci the breathing rate of the child age group, 3700 m3/yr, from Table E-5, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev.I the thyroid organ inhalation dose factor for child age group for the ith radionuclide, in mrem/pCi, from Table E-9, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1 the ventilation vent site boundary X/Q, 9.3E-06 sec/m3, or the process vent site boundary 'X/Q, 1.2E-06 sec/m3, as appropriate.
(29-1) a constant of unit conversion, 1 E+ 12 pCi/Ci the breathing rate of the child age group, 3700 m3/yr, from Table E-5, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev.I the thyroid organ inhalation dose factor for child age group for the ith radionuclide, in mrem/pCi, from Table E-9, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1 the ventilation vent site boundary X/Q, 9.3E-06 sec/m3, or the process vent site boundary 'X/Q, 1.2E-06 sec/m3, as appropriate.
VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 29 (Page 6 of 8) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 154 OF 156 North Anna Meteorological, Liquid, and Gaseous Pathway Analysis Step 6.3.4.a., requires that the dose to the maximum exposed member of the public from I 131 , 1 133 , tritium, and from all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days be less than or equal to the specified limits. Dose calculations were performed for an exposed ~ember of the public within site boundary unrestricted areas, and to an exposed member of the public beyond site boundary at locations identified in the North Anna Power Station Annual Environmental Survey Data for 1981. lt was determined that the member of the public within site boundary would be using Lake Anna for recreational purposes a maximum of 2232 hours per year. It is assumed that this member of the public would be located the entire 2232 hours at the lake shoreline with the largest annual X/Q of l.OE-04 at a location 274 meters NNE sector. The NRC computer code GASP AR was run to calculate the inhalation dose to this individual.
VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 29 (Page 6 of 8) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 154 OF 156 North Anna Meteorological, Liquid, and Gaseous Pathway Analysis Step 6.3.4.a., requires that the dose to the maximum exposed member of the public from I 131 , 1 133 , tritium, and from all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days be less than or equal to the specified limits. Dose calculations were performed for an exposed ~ember of the public within site boundary unrestricted areas, and to an exposed member of the public beyond site boundary at locations identified in the North Anna Power Station Annual Environmental Survey Data for 1981. lt was determined that the member of the public within site boundary would be using Lake Anna for recreational purposes a maximum of 2232 hours per year. It is assumed that this member of the public would be located the entire 2232 hours at the lake shoreline with the largest annual X/Q of l.OE-04 at a location 274 meters NNE sector. The NRC computer code GASP AR was run to calculate the inhalation dose to this individual.
The GASP AR results were corrected for the fractional year the member of the public would be using the lake. Using the NRC comput(?r code GASPAR and annual average X/Q and D/Q values obtained as described in Section 1 of this attachment, the member of the public receiving the largest dose beyond site boundary was determined to be located 3250 meters N sector. The critical.pathway was the grass-cow-milk, the maximum age group was the infant, and the critical organ the thyroid. For each year 1979, 1980, and 1981 the dose to the infant from the grass-cow-milk pathway was greater than the dose to the member of the public within site boundary.
The GASP AR results were corrected for the fractional year the member of the public would be using the lake. Using the NRC comput(?r code GASPAR and annual average X/Q and D/Q values obtained as described in Section 1 of this attachment, the member of the public receiving the largest dose beyond site boundary was determined to be located 3250 meters N sector. The critical.pathway was the grass-cow-milk, the maximum age group was the infant, and the critical organ the thyroid. For each year 1979, 1980, and 1981 the dose to the infant from the grass-cow-milk pathway was greater than the dose to the member of the public within site boundary.
Therefore, the maximum exposed member of the public was determined to be the infant, exposed through the grass-cow-milk pathway, critical organ thyroid, at a location 3250 meters N sector. Pathway analysis results indicate that existing pathways, including ground and inhalation, within five miles of North Anna Power Station, yield Ri dose factors less than those determined for the cow-milk pathway. Although the cow-milk pathway does not exist within five miles of the Station, ~EG-0133 requires the use of cow-milk Ri dose factors since these values result
Therefore, the maximum exposed member of the public was determined to be the infant, exposed through the grass-cow-milk pathway, critical organ thyroid, at a location 3250 meters N sector. Pathway analysis results indicate that existing pathways, including ground and inhalation, within five miles of North Anna Power Station, yield Ri dose factors less than those determined for the cow-milk pathway. Although the cow-milk pathway does not exist within five miles of the Station, ~EG-0133 requires the use of cow-milk Ri dose factors since these values result
* in the most limiting doses. There is no requirement to include the other pathways.  
* in the most limiting doses. There is no requirement to include the other pathways.
[Commitment 3.2.3] * * *   
[Commitment 3.2.3] * * *   
* *
* *
Line 1,119: Line 1,119:
* *
* *
* MAJOR CHANGES TO RADIOACTIVE LIQUID, GASEOUS AND SOLID WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS Attachment 4 Page 1 of 1 There were no major changes to Surry's Radioactive Liquid, Gaseous or Solid Waste Treatment Systems during this reporting period .   
* MAJOR CHANGES TO RADIOACTIVE LIQUID, GASEOUS AND SOLID WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS Attachment 4 Page 1 of 1 There were no major changes to Surry's Radioactive Liquid, Gaseous or Solid Waste Treatment Systems during this reporting period .   
* * * . INOPERABILITY OF RADIOACTIVE LIQUID AND GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION Attachment 5 Page 1 ofl There were four effluent monitors, as identified in the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, that were out of service for more than thirty days in 1994. The monitors are: 1. Ol-SW-RM-107C, Component Cooling Service Water Effluent Line Monitor. This monitor was removed from service during the replacement of the 'C' Component Cooling Heat Exchanger per DCP-87-029.  
* * * . INOPERABILITY OF RADIOACTIVE LIQUID AND GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION Attachment 5 Page 1 ofl There were four effluent monitors, as identified in the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, that were out of service for more than thirty days in 1994. The monitors are: 1. Ol-SW-RM-107C, Component Cooling Service Water Effluent Line Monitor. This monitor was removed from service during the replacement of the 'C' Component Cooling Heat Exchanger per DCP-87-029.
: 2. Ol-SW-RM-120, Unit #1 Circulating Water Discharge Line Monitor. This monitor . was removed from service per EWR 91-055 for detector and ratemeter replacement.
: 2. Ol-SW-RM-120, Unit #1 Circulating Water Discharge Line Monitor. This monitor . was removed from service per EWR 91-055 for detector and ratemeter replacement.
Compensatory sampling, as required by the ODCM, was performed while the monitor was out of service. 3. 02-SW-RM-220, Unit #2 Circulating Waster Discharge Line Monitor. This monitor was removed from service per EWR-91-055 for detector and ratemeter replacement and refurbishment of the detector well assembly.
Compensatory sampling, as required by the ODCM, was performed while the monitor was out of service. 3. 02-SW-RM-220, Unit #2 Circulating Waster Discharge Line Monitor. This monitor was removed from service per EWR-91-055 for detector and ratemeter replacement and refurbishment of the detector well assembly.

Revision as of 08:38, 25 April 2019

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept Surry Power Station Jan-Dec 1994. W/950426 Ltr
ML18151A295
Person / Time
Site: Surry  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 12/31/1994
From: BOWLING M L
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
95-169, NUDOCS 9505040261
Download: ML18151A295 (191)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:I #.-e e VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23261 April 26, 1995 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Gentlemen: VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 Serial No. 95-169 NURPC Docket Nos. 50-280 50-281 License Nos. DPR-32 DPR-37 ANNUAL RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT Enclosed is the Surry Power Station Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for January 1, 1994 through December 31, 1994. The report, submitted pursuant to Surry Power Station Technical Specification 6.6.B.3, includes a summary of the quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents and solid waste released during the 1994 calendar year, as outlined in Regulatory Guide 1.21, Revision 1, June 1974. Very truly yours, JW/54 M. L. Bowling, Manager Nuclear Licensing and Programs Attachment cc: U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, N. W. Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. M. W. Branch NRC Senior Resident Inspector Surry Power Station !r-' 9505040261

  • 941231 \ PDR ADOCK 05000280 I R PDR ANNUAL RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELF.ASE REPORT ~'D W/LTR DTD 4/26/95 .** 9505040261
  • -NOTICE -THE ATTACHED FILES ARE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE INFORMATION

& RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH. THEY HAVE BEEN CHARGED TO YOU FOR A LIMITED TIME PERIOD AND MUST BE RETURNED TO THE RECORDS & ARCHIVES SERVICES SECTION, T5 C3. PLEASE DO NOT SEND DOCUMENTS CHARGED OUT THROUGH THE MAIL. REMOVAL OF ANY PAGE(S) FROM DOCUMENT FOR REPRODUCTION MUST BE . REFERRED TO FILE PERSONNEL. -NOTICE -

  • ...... *' ATTACHMENT ANNUAL RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE NOS. DPR-32 AND DPR-37
  • ANNUAL RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT SURRY POWER STATION (January 1, 1994 Through December 31, 1994) Prepared By: f: -g(__, , .f-Staff Health Physicist Reviewed By: 'pervisor Radio! 'cal ng Reviewed
  • Section No.
  • 1 2 3 4
  • ANNUAL RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT FOR THE SURRY POWER STATION (January 1, 1994 Through December 31, 1994) Index Subject Page Executive Summary Purpose and Scope Discussion Supplemental Information Attachment 1 Effluent Release Data Attachment 2 Annual and Quarterly Doses Attachment 3 Revisions to Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) 1 2 3 & 4 5 Attachment 4 Major Changes to Radioactive Liquid, Gaseous and Solid Waste Treatment Systems Attachment 5 Inoperability of Radioactive Liquid and Gaseous Effluent Instrumentation Attachment 6 Unplanned Releases Attachment 7 Lower Level of Detection (LLD) for Effluent Analysis
  • * ** EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT The Annual Radiological Effluent Release Report describes the radiological effluent control program conducted at the Surry Power station during the 1994 calendar year. This document summarizes the quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents and solid waste released from the Surry Power Station in accordance with R. G. 1.21 and includes an assessment of radiation doses to the maximum exposed member of the public due to radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents. There were no unplanned liquid or gaseous effluent releases classified according to the criteria in the Offsite Dose calculation Manual during this reporting period. Based on the 1994 effluent calculations were performed in Calculation Manual. The results indicate the following: release data, Appendix I dose accordance with the Offsite Dose of these pathway dose calculations

1. The total body dose due to liquid effluents was 5.99E-04 mrem, which is 9. 98E-03% of the dose limit and the critical organ (GI-LLI) dose due to liquid effluents was 7.89E-04 mrem, which is 3.95E-03%

of the dose limit

  • 2. The air dose due to noble gases was 1.lOE-01 mrad gamma, which is 5.SE-01% of the annual gamma dose limit, and 3. 4 7E-Ol mrad beta, which is 8. 68E-01% of the annual beta dose limit. 3. The critical organ dose for I-131, I-133, H-3, and particuiates with half-lives greater than 8 days is 8.20E-02 mrem, which is 2.73E-01%

of the annual dose limit. There were no major changes to radioactive liquid, gaseous, and solid waste treatment systems during this reporting period. There were changes to the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, VPAP-2103, during this reporting period which were implemented in Revisions 5 and 6 on January 1, 1994 and December 1, 1994 respectively. Attachment 3 provides the changes to VPAP-2103. Based on the levels of radioactivity observed during this reporting period and the dose calculations performed, the operations of the Surry Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2, have resulted in negligible radiation dose consequences to the maximum exposed member of the public in unrestricted areas . 1

  • *
  • Purpose and Scope The Radioactive Effluent Release Report includes a summary of the quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents and solid waste as outlined in Regulatory Guide 1.21, "Measuring, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactivity in Solid Wastes and Releases of Radioactive Materials in Liquid and Gaseous Effluents from Water-cooled Nuclear Power Plants", Revision 1, June 1974, with data summarized on a quarterly basis following the format of Tables 1, 2 and 3 of Appendix B thereof. The report includes an assessment of radiation doses to the maximum exposed member of the public due to radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents released from the site during the previous calendar year. Additionally a list of unplanned releases during the reporting period is included in Attachment
6. As required by Technical Specification
6. 8. B, changes to the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) for the time period covered by this report are included in Attachment
3. Major changes to the radioactive liquid, gaseous and solid waste treatment systems are reported in Attachment 4, as required by the ODCM, Section 6.7.2. If changes are made to these systems, the report shall include information to support the reason for the change and a summary of the lOCFRS0.59 evaluation.

In lieu of reporting major changes in this report, major changes to the radioactive waste treatment systems may be submitted as part of the annual FSAR update.

  • As required by the ODCM, Sections 6.2.2.b.2 and 6.3.2.b.3, a list and explanation for the inoperability of radioactive liquid and/or gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation is provided in Attachment 5 of this report
  • 2
  • *
  • Discussion The basis for the calculation of the percent of technical specification for the critical organ in Table lA of Attachment 1 is the ODCM section, 6.3.1, which requires that the dose rate for iodine -131, iodine -133, for tritium, and for all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days shall be less than or equal to 1500 mRem/yr to the critical organ at or beyond the site boundary.

The critical organ is the. child's thyroid, inhalation pathway. The basis for the calculation of the percent of technical specification for the total body and skin in Table lA of Attachment 1, is the ODCM, section 6.3.1, which requires that the dose rate for noble gases to areas at or beyond site boundary shall be less than or equal to 500 mRem/yr to the total body and less than or equal to 3000 mRem/yr to the skin. The basis for the calculation of the percent of technical specification in Table 2A of Attachment 1, is the ODCM, section 6.2.1, which states that the concentration of radioactive material releases in liquid effluents to unrestricted areas shall not exceed ten times the concentrations specified in 10CFR20, Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2 for radionuclides other than dissolved or entrained noble gases. For dissolved or entrained noble gases, the concentration shall be limited to 2.00E-04 microcuries/ml. Percent of technical specification calculations are based on the total gaseous or liquid effluents released for that respective quarter. The annual and quarterly doses, as reported in Attachment 2, were calculated according to the methodology presented in the ODCM. The beta and gamma air doses due to noble gases released from the site were calculated at the site boundary. The maximum exposed member of the public from the release of airborne iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium and all radionuclides in particulate form with half lives greater than 8 days, is defined as an infant, exposed through the grass-cow-milk pathway, with the critical organ being the thyroid gland. The maximum exposed member of the public from radioactive materials in liquid effluents in unrestricted areas is defined as an adult, exposed by either the invertebrate or fish pathway, with the critical organ being either the thyroid gland or gastrointestinal-lower large intestine. The total body dose was also determined for this individual . 3

  • *
  • Presented in Attachment 6 is a list of unplanned gaseous and liquid releases as required by the ODCM, Section 6.7.2. The typical lower level of detection (LLD) capabilities of the radioactive effluent analysis instrumentation are presented in Attachment
7. These LLD values are based upon conservative conditions (i.e., minimum sample volumes and maximum delay time prior to analysis) . Actual LLD values may be lower. If a radioisotope was not detected when efflu~nt samples were analyzed, then the activity of the radioisotope was reported as Not Detected (N/D) on Attachment 1 of this report. When all isotopes listed on Attachment 1 for a particular quarter and release mode are less than the lower level of detection, then the totals for this period will be designated as Not Applicable (N/A)
  • 4
  • *
  • supplemental Xnformation Section 6.6.1.b.4 of the ODCM requires the identification of the cause(s) for the unavailability of milk or if required, leafy vegetation samples, and the identification for obtaining replacement samples. As all milk samples were available for collection during this reporting period, leafy vegetation sampling was not required.

As required by the ODCM, section 6.6.2, evaluation of the Land Use Census is made to determine if new sample location(s) must be added to the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program. Evaluation of the Land Use Census conducted for this reporting period identified no change in sample locations for the radiological environmental monitoring program

  • 5
  • *
  • Attachment 1 EFFLUENT RELEASE DATA (January 1, 1994 Through December 31, 1994) This attachment includes a summary of the quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents and solid waste as outlined in Regulatory Guide 1.21, Appendix B .
  • *
  • TABLE 1A EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT PERIOD 1/1/94 TO 12/31/94 GASEOUS EFFLUENT-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1&2 UNIT FIRST SECOND QUARTER QUARTER A. FISSION & ACTIVATION GASES 1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci 2.65E+02 7.llE+OO 2. A VE RELEASE RATE FOR PERIOD µ.Ci/sec 3.41E+Ol 9.0SE-01 B. IODINE 1. TOTAL 1-131 Ci 3.61E-03 1.82E-04 2. A VE RELEASE RATE FOR PERIOD µ.Ci/sec 4.64E-04 2.31E-05 C. PARTICULATE
1. HALF-LIFE

> 8 DAYS Ci 1.25E-05 1.83E-05 2. AVE RELEASE RATE FOR PERIOD µ.Ci/sec 1.61E-06 2.32E-06 3. GROSS ALPHA RADIOACTIVITY Ci O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO D. TRITIUM 1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci 4.73E+00 3.SOE+OO 2. A VE RELEASE RATE FOR PERIOD µ.Ci/sec 6.0SE-01 4.46E-Ol PERCENTAGE OF T.S. LIMITS CRITICAL ORGAN DOSE RATE % 3.35E-02 3.SOE-03 TOTAL BODY DOSE RATE % 7.32E-02 7.64E-04 SKIN DOSE RATE % 3.lOE-02 4.llE-04 Attachment 1 Page 1 of 12 % EST. ERROR l.80E+Ol 2.80E+Ol 2.80E+Ol 3.lOE+Ol

  • *
  • TABLE 1A EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT PERIOD 1/1/94 TO 12/31/94 GASEOUS EFFLUENT-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1&2 UNIT THIRD FOURTH QUARTER QUARTER A. FISSION & ACTIVATION GASES 1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci 1.SlE-01 3.13E+OO 2. A VE RELEASE RATE FOR PERIOD µCi/sec 2.28E-02 3.94E-01 B. IODINE 1. TOTAL 1-131 Ci 1.43E-05 2.44E-04 2. A VE RELEASE RATE FOR PERIOD µCi/sec 1.SOE-06 3.07E-05 C. PARTICULATE
1. HALF-LIFE

> 8 DAYS Ci 1.SSE-04 1.26E-04 2. A VE RELEASE RATE FOR PERIOD µCi/sec 1.99E-05 1.SSE-05 3. GROSS ALPHA RADIOACTIVITY Ci O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO D. TRITIUM 1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci 3.16E+00 3.67E+OO 2. A VE RELEASE RATE FOR PERIOD µCi/sec 3.97E-01 4.62E-01 PERCENTAGE OF T.S. LIMITS CRITICAL ORGAN DOSE RATE % 1.87E-03 4.lOE-03 TOTAL BODY DOSE RATE % 3.67E-05 6.46E-05 SKIN DOSE RATE % 9.44E-06 2.16E-05 Attachment 1 Page 2 of 12 % EST. ERROR 1.SOE+Ol 2.80E+01 2.80E+01 3.lOE+Ol

Attachment 1 TABLElB Page 3 of 12 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT

  • PERIOD: 1/1/94 TO 12131194 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS-MIXED MODE RELEASES CONTINUOUS MODE BATCH MODE SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1&2 UNIT FIRST SECOND FIRST SECOND QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER 1. FISSION & ACTN ATION GASES Kr-85 Ci 1.08E+Ol N/D 2.SOE+Ol 3.12E+OO Kr-85m Ci N/D N/D N/D 5.61E-04 Kr-87 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Kr-88 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Xe-133 Ci 6.31E+Ol 8.60E-02 3.23E-01 2.llE+OO Xe-135 Ci 2.07E-02 N/D 4.12E-04 5.21E-02 Xe-135m Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Xe-138 Ci N/D NID NID NID Xe-131m Ci 1.27E+00 NID 2.37E-01 5.72E-03 Xe-133m Ci 4.68E-01 NID N/D 1.74E-02 Ar-41 Ci N/D NID NID 8.74E-04 TOTAL FOR PERIOD Ci 7.57E+Ol 8.60E-02 2.56E+Ol 5.31E+00
  • 2. IODINES I-131 Ci 1.17E-06 1.84E-08 NID N/D I-133 Ci N/D NID NID N/D I-135 Ci N/D NID NID N/D TOTAL FOR PERIOD Ci 1.17E-06 1.84E-08 NIA NIA 3. PARTICULATES Sr-89 Ci N/D N/D NID NID Sr-90 Ci NID NID NID NID Cs-134 Ci N/D N/D NID NID Cs-137 Ci 3.99E-08 1.76E-07 NID N/D Ba-140 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D La-140 Ci NID N/D N/D NID Co-60 Ci 2.36E-08 9.37E-08 NID NID TOTAL FOR PERIOD Ci 6.35E-08 2.70E-07 NIA NIA *

~--Attachment 1 TABLElB Page 4 of 12 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT

  • PERIOD: 111194 TO 12131194 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS-MIXED MODE RELEASES CONTINUOUS MODE BATCH MODE SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1&2 UNIT THIRD FOURTH THIRD FOURTH QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER 1. FISSION & ACTIVATION GASES Kr-85 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Kr-85m Ci N/D N/D N/D 1.49E-03 Kr-87 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Kr-88 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Xe-133 Ci 2.0SE-02 1.17E-01 1.SSE-01 2.SOE+OO Xe-135m Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Xe-135 Ci N/D 8.00E-03 N/D 1.32E-Ol Xe-138 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Xe-131m Ci N/D N/D N/D 6.32E-03 Xe-133m Ci N/D N/D 3.62E-04 3.30E-02 TOTAL FOR PERIOD Ci 2.0SE-02 1.25E-01 1.SSE-01 2.97E+00
  • 2. IODINES 1-131 Ci N/D 8.07E-08 N/D N/D 1-133 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D 1-135 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D TOTAL FOR PERIOD Ci NIA 8.07E-08 NIA NIA 3. PARTICULATES Sr-89 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Sr-90 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Cs-134 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Cs-137 Ci 5.64E-08 1.75E-08 N/D N/D Ba-140 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D La-140 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Co-58 Ci 2.12E-09 N/D N/D N/D Co-60 Ci 5.17E-08 2.27E-08 N/D N/D TOTAL FOR PERIOD Ci 1.lOE-07 4.02E-08 NIA NIA *

TABLElC Attachment 1 Page 5 of 12 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT

  • PERIOD:1/1194 TO 12131194 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS-GROUND LEVEL RELEASES CONTINUOUS MODE BATCH MODE SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1&2 UNIT FffiST SECOND FffiST SECOND QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER 1. FISSION & ACTIVATION GASES Kr-85 Ci NID 2.SOE-01 5.09E+OO N/D Kr-85m Ci 1.17E-04 NID NID NID Kr-87 Ci NID NID NID NID Kr-88 Ci NID NID NID NID Xe-133 Ci 9.54E+Ol 1.39E+00 6.21E+Ol NID Xe-135 Ci l.73E-03 2.63E-02 3.60E-01 NID Xe-135m Ci 2.48E-05 4.44E-04 NID NID Xe-138 Ci NID NID NID N/D Ar-41 Ci 1.16E-03 l.93E-03 NID NID Xe-133m Ci NID 2.lSE-02 NID NID Xe-131m Ci 2.34E-01 N/D 4.14E-Ol N/D TOTAL FOR PERIOD Ci 9.56E+Ol 1.72E+00 6.80E+Ol NIA
  • 2. IODINES 1-131 Ci 3.53E-03 1.82E-04 7.83E-05 N/D 1-133 Ci 8.78E-05 N/D 1.65E-05 N/D 1-135 Ci N/D N/D N/D NID TOTAL FOR PERIOD Ci 3.62E-03 1.82E-04 9.48E-05 NIA 3. PARTICULATES Sr-89 Ci NID NID NID NID Sr-90 Ci NID NID NID NID Cs-134 Ci NID NID N/D NID Cs-137 Ci 9.44E-06 l.29E-05 N/D NID Ba-140 Ci NID NID NID NID La-140 Ci NID NID NID NID Se-75 Ci NID 5.44E-07 N/D NID Co-58 Ci NID 2.35E-06 NID 1.59E-08 Co-60 Ci 3.02E-06 2.ZOE-06 NID NID TOTAL FOR PERIOD Ci 1.25E-05 1.80E-05 NIA 1.59E-08 *
  • *
  • TABLElC EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT PERIOD:111/94 TO 12131194 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS-GROUND LEVEL RELEASES Attachment 1 Page 6 of 12 CONTINUOUS MODE BATCH MODE SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1&2 UNIT THIRD FOURTH THIRD FOURTH QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER 1. FISSION & ACTIVATION GASES Kr-85 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Kr-85m Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Kr-87 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Kr-88 Ci NID N/D NID N/D Xe-133 Ci 9.90E-06 2.19E-02 N/D N/D Xe-135m Ci 8.33E-04 4.02E-04 NID N/D Xe-135 Ci 1.04E-03 4.97E-04 N/D N/D Xe-138 Ci NID NID NID N/D Ar-41 Ci 2.14E-03 1.77E-03 N/D N/D TOTAL FOR PERIOD Ci 4.02E-03 2.46E-02 NIA NIA 2. IODINES 1-131 Ci 1.43E-05 2.44E-04 NID 8.13E-09 1-133 Ci N/D N/D NID N/D 1-135 Ci N/D N/D NID NID TOTAL FOR PERIOD Ci 1.43E-05 2.44E-04 NIA 8.13E-09 3. PARTICULATES Sr-89 Ci NID NID NID NID Sr-90 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Cs-134 Ci NID 7.SlE-07 NID N/D Cs-137 Ci 1.14E-04 8.73E-05 N/D 1.0lE-05 Ba-140 Ci NID NID NID N/D La-140 Ci N/D N/D NID N/D Se-75 Ci N/D 4.13E-07 NID N/D Co-58 Ci 1.09E-05 N/D N/D NID Co-60 Ci 3.37E-05 2.03E-05 NID 6.SSE-06 TOTAL FOR PERIOD Ci l.59E-04 1.09E-04 NIA 1.67E-05
  • *
  • TABLE2A EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT PERIOD: 1/1/94 TO 12/31/94 LIQUID EFFLUENTS-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1&2 UNIT FIRST SECOND QUARTER QUARTER A. FISSION AND ACTIVATION PRODUCTS 1. TOTAL RELEASE (NOT INCLUDING TRITIUM, GASES, ALPHA) Ci 2.48E-02 1.28E-02 2. A VE DIL. CONC. DURING PERIOD µCi/ml 6.21E-11 2.00E-11 3. PERCENT OF APPLICABLE LIMIT % 4.78E-04 1.76E-04 B. TRITIUM 1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci 1.64E+02 2.92E+02 2. A VE DIL. CONC. DURING PERIOD µCi/ml 4.09E-07 4.57E-07 3. PERCENT OF APPLICABLE LIMIT % 4.09E-03 4.57E-03 C. DISSOLVED AND ENTRAINED GASES 1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci 1.24E-06 O.OOE+OO 2. A VE DIL. CONC. DURING PERIOD µCi/ml 3.lOE-15 O.OOE+OO 3. PERCENT OF APPLICABLE LIMIT % 1.SSE-09 O.OOE+OO D. GROSS ALPHA RADIOACTIVITY
1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO E. VOLUME OF WASTE RELEASED (PRIOR TO DILUTION)

LITERS 1.65E+08 1.70E+08 F. VOLUME OF DILUTION WATER USED DURING PERIOD LITERS 3.99E+ll 6.38E+ll Attachment 1 Page 7 of 12 % EST. ERROR 2.00E+Ol 2.00E+Ol 2.00E+Ol 2.00E+Ol 3.00E+OO 3.00E+OO

  • *
  • TABLE2A EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT PERIOD: 1/1/94 TO 12/31/94 LIQUID EFFLUENTS-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1&2 UNIT THIRD FOURTH QUARTER QUARTER A. FISSION AND ACTIVATION PRODUCTS 1. TOTAL RELEASE (NOT INCLUDING TRITIUM, GASES, ALPHA) Ci 1.32E-02 1.40E-02 2. A VE DIL. CONC. DURING PERIOD µCi/ml 1.7SE-11 2.16E-11 3. PERCENT OF APPLICABLE LIMIT % 1.58E-04 1.89E-04 B. TRITIUM 1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci 1.8SE+02 3.38E+02 2. A VE DIL. CONC. DURING PERIOD µCi/ml 2.44E-07 5.23E-07 3. PERCENT OF APPLICABLE LIMIT % 2.44E-03 5.23E-03 C. DISSOLVED AND ENTRAINED GASES 1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 2. A VE DIL. CONC. DURING PERIOD µCi/ml O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 3. PERCENT OF APPLICABLE LIMIT % O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO D. GROSS ALPHA RADIOACTIVITY
1. TOTAL RELEASE Ci O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO E. VOLUME OF WASTE RELEASED (PRIOR TO DILUTION)

LITERS 1.71E+08 1.72E+08 F. VOLUME OF DILUTION WATER USED DURING PERIOD LITERS 7.53E+ll 6.46E+ll Attachment 1 Page 8 of 12 % EST. ERROR 2.00E+Ol 2.00E+Ol 2.00E+Ol 2.00E+Ol 3.00E+OO 3.00E+OO Attachment 1 Page 9 of 12

  • TABLE2B EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT PERIOD: 111194 TO Ul31194 LIQUID EFFLUENTS CONTINUOUS MODE BATCH MODE SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1&2 UNIT FIRST SECOND FIRST SECOND QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER Sr-89 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Sr-90 Ci N/D NID NID N/D Cs-134 Ci 9.60E-05 9.91E-05 l.69E-06 N/D Cs-137 Ci 1.61E-02 1.03E-02 4.87E-05 1.70E-06 1-131 Ci N/D N/D 7.78E-06 N/D Co-58 Ci N/D N/D NID N/D Co-60 Ci 8.SOE-03 2.30E-03 1.56E-05 2.89E-05 Fe-59 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Zn-65 Ci N/D N/D NID N/D Mn-54 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Cr-51 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Zr-95 Ci N/D N/D 5.74E-06 N/D Nb-95 Ci N/D N/D 6.04E-06 N/D Mo-99 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D
  • Tc-99m Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Ba-140 Ci N/D N/D NID N/D La-140 Ci N/D NID N/D N/D Ce-141 Ci N/D N/D NID N/D Sb-122 Ci N/D N/D 5.99E-08 N/D TOTAL FOR PERIOD Ci 2.47E-02 1.27E-02 8.56E-05 3.06E-05 Xe-133 Ci N/D NID 1.24E-06 N/D Xe-135 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D TOTAL FOR PERIOD NIA NIA 1.24E-06 NIA
  • Attachment 1 TABLE2B Page 10 of 12 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT
  • PERIOD: 1/1/94 TO 12/31/94 LIQUID EFFLUENTS CONTINUOUS MODE BATCH MODE SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1&2 UNIT THIRD FOURTH THIRD FOURTH QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER Sr-89 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Sr-90 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Cs-134 Ci 1.25E-OS 6.82E-05 1.85E-06 1.73E-05 Cs-137 Ci 1.12E-02 1.14E-02 2.33E-06 2.SOE-05 1-131 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Co-58 Ci 6.SSE-05 N/D 2.78E-06 1.52E-04 Co-60 Ci 1.90E-03 1.68E-03 1.58E-06 4.03E-04 Fe-59 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Zn-65 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Mn-54 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Cr-51 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Zr-95 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Nb-95 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Mo-99 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Tc-99m Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D Ba-140 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D La-140 Ci N/D N/D N/D N/D
  • Ce-141 Ci N/D NID N/D N/D Co-51 Ci 1.61E-06 N/D NID N/D Sb-122 Ci NID NID N/D N/D Sb-125 Ci N/D NID NID 3.79E-OS TOTAL FOR PERIOD Ci 1.32E-02 1.31E-02 8.S4E-06 6.3SE-04 Xe-133 Ci N/D N/D NID N/D Xe-135 Ci N/D N/D NID N/D TOTAL FOR PERIOD Ci NIA NIA NIA NIA *
  • TABLE3 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS PERIOD: 1/1/94 -12/31/94 SURRY POWER STATION A. SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL (Not irradiated fuel) 1. Type of waste 12 month Period a. Spent resins, filter sludges, evaporator m3 1.56E+02*

bottoms,etc. Ci 7.49E+02 b. Dry compressible waste, contaminated m3 7.25E+02** equip., etc. Ci 3.38E+OO c. Irradiated components, control m3 1.02E-Ol rods, etc. Ci 1.30E-03 d. Other (Waste Oil) m3 3.75E+OO*** Ci 1.61E-01

  • 2. Estimate of major nuclide composition (by type of waste) a. Co-60 % 4.88E+Ol Ni-63 % 2.82E+Ol Fe-55 % 7.25E+OO Co-58 % 7.03E+OO Cs-137 % 3.60E+OO Cs-134 % 3.0SE+OO Mn-54 % 1.20E+OO b. Co-60 % 3.54E+Ol Fe-55 % 2.20E+Ol Ni-63 % 1.44E+Ol Co-58 % 9.17E+OO Cs-137 % 8.79E+OO Nb-95 % 4.12E+OO H-3 % 3.26E+OO Zr-95 % 2.18E+OO
  • Attachment 1 Page 11 of 12 Est. Total Error, % 1.00E+Ol 3.00E+Ol 1.00E+Ol 3.00E+Ol 1.00E+Ol 3.00E+Ol 1.00E+Ol 3.00E+Ol
  • TABLE3 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED.FUEL SIDPMENTS PERIOD: 1/1/94 -12/31/94 CONT'D SURRY POWER STATION A. SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL (Not irradiated fuel) 2. Estimate of major nuclide composition (by type of waste) c. Fe-SS % 6.03E+Ol Co-60 % 2.79E+Ol Ni-63 % 7.00E+OO Mn-54 % 4.SOE+OO d. C-14 % 7.37E+Ol Ni-63 % 8.7SE+OO U-233/34 % 7.S6E+OO Fe-SS % 4.SSE+OO Tc-99 % 2.lSE+OO Pu-241 % 1.34E+OO Attachment 1 Page 12 of 12
  • 3. Solid Waste Disposition Number of Shipments 39 14 1 Mode of Trans.nortation Truck Truck Truck Destination Barnwell, SC Oak Ridge, TN Wampum,PA B. IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENT (Disposition)

Number of Shipments 0 Mode of Trans.nortation Destination

  • NOTE 1: 7.61E+00 m3 of the resin/sludge was shipped to a licensed waste processor for processing and/or volume reduction.

Therefore, this volume is not representative of the actual volume buried. The total volume buried for this reporting period is 1.66E+02 m3. ** NOTE 2: 7.14E+02 m3 of the DAW was shipped to licensed waste processors for volume reduction. Therefore, this volume is not representative of the actual volume buried. The total volume buried for this reporting period is 6.71E+Ol m3. *** NOTE 3: Waste oil was shipped to a licensed waste processor for incineration. Therefore, 3.75E+00 m3 is not representative of the actual volume buried. The total volume buried for this reporting period is O.OOE+OO m3 . *

  • *
  • Attachment 2 Page 1 of 1 ANNUAL AND QUARTERLY DOSES An assessment of radiation doses to the maximum exposed member of the public due to radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents released from the site for each calendar quarter for the calendar year of this report, along with an annual total of each effluent pathway is made pursuant to the ODCM, section 6.7.2 requirement.

1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Annual Total Body (mrem) 2.57E-04 1.21E-04 8.74E-05 1.34E-04 5.99E-04 LIQUID Thyroid GI-LLI (mrem) (mrem) 5.41E-05 4.92E-04 5.80E-05 1.llE-04 3.lSE-05 7.02E-05 6.59E-05 1.16E-04 2.lOE-04 7.89E-04 GASEOUS Gamma Beta Thyroid (mrad) (mrad) (mrem) 1.09E-01 3.42E-01 7.28E-02 1.13E-03 4.32E-03 3.76E-03 4.91E-05 2.54E-05 3.75E-04 9.21E-05 1.68E-04 5.02E-03 1.lOE-01 3.47E-01 8.20E-02 . , Attachment 3 Page 1 of 1

  • REVISIONS TO OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL CODCM} As required by Technical Specification 6.8.B, revisions to the ODCM, effective for the time period covered by this report, are summarized in this report. There were two procedure revisions and one procedure change to Revision 5 implemented during the period January 1, 1994 through December 31, 1994. Included in this attachment is VPAP-2103, Revision 6, effective December 1, 1994. All changes which were implemented by Revision 5, effective January 1, 1994, and a procedure change, effective June 16, 1994, are included in Revision 6. The specific changes are summarized on the cover sheet of the ODCM. Revision 5 implemented changes in support of the revised 1 OCFR20 requirements and the change in reporting frequency of the radioactive effluent release report from semiannual to annual. In addition there were changes in Surry' s radiological environmental monitoring program as well as miscellaneous editorial changes and corrections .
  • The procedure change, designated PNl and PSI and approved June 16, 1994, added iodine-133 to the gaseous effluent dose limit specification for the critical organ and redefined critical organ. The information on iodine-133 was included throughout the ODCM.
  • Revision 6 implemented changes to Surry's radiological environmental monitoring program based on various sample location changes, elimination of sample locations, and sample collection frequency changes. The criteria for classifying unplanned liquid and gaseous effluent releases was modified to include the NRC's Health Physics Position on the Definition of Unplanned Releases.

There were also miscellaneous editorial changes and corrections addressed in Revision 6 .

  • * *
  • Station Administrative Procedure VIRGINIA POWER e 1993 by Virginia Power. All Rights Reserved Title: Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Lead Department:

Radiological Protection Procedure Number VPAP-2103 Revision Number 5 Effective Date 01/01/94 Revision Summary

  • Implement revised 10 CFR 20 requirements RECEIVED . . ......
  • Change effluent reporting requirements from semi-annual to annual
  • Add liquid and gaseous release permits from VPAP-2101 JLJN I j fQQA
  • Incorporate Surry P 1 -replacement of dairy sample location for Surry Attachments 2Vand 22 and editorial change to Attachment 21, page 5, line 4 SUR ,.. ,..
  • Incorporate P2-replacement of Poole's Garden for Surry Attachmen~2:f>O

... UMi:NT MGT .

  • Change variables in liquid effluent monitor setpoint calculations
  • Changed 10 ECW to ACW
  • Replaced 10 (ECW)i with ACWi in applicable equation
  • Removed Surry L W-108 instrument from the effluent monitoring instrumentation attachments 0 Removed Bacons Castle and Jamestown as sources of SPS Well water samples
  • Incorporate Surry P-1 to HP-7.3A.20 to allow liquid transfers to the Surry Radwaste Facility without requiring a Liquid Waste Batch Release Permit (see 6.4.1.a)
  • Miscellaneous editorial changes and corrections (no change bars) Surry Power Station North Anna Power Station Approved by: Approved by: SNSOC Chairman 116/z) Date Approved by: 9 £~ L . \Tice President-Nuclear Operations
  • Station Administrative Procedure VIRGINIA POWER e 1994 by Virginia Power. All Righ!S Reserved Title: Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Lead Department:

Radiological Protection Procedure Number Revision Number Effective Date VPAP-2103 5-PN & Sl See Par Revision SummaryE-PAR

  • Implement revised 10 CFR 20 requirements
  • Change effluent reporting requirements from semi-annual to annual
  • Add liquid and gaseous release permits from VPAP-2101
  • Incorporate Surry Pl -replacement of dairy sample location for Surry Attachments 20 and 22 and editorial change to Attachment 21, page 5, line 4 *
  • Incorporate P2 -replacement of Poole's Garden for Surry Attachment 22
  • Change variables in liquid effluent monitor setpoint calculations
  • Changed 10 ECW to ACW
  • Replaced 10 (ECW)i with ACWi in applicable equation
  • Removed Surry LW-108 instrument from the effluent monitoring instrumentation attachments
  • Removed Bacons Castle and Jamestown as sources of SPS Wellwater samples .
  • Incorporate Surry P-1 to HP-7 .3A.20 to allow liquid transfers to the Surry Radwaste Facility without requiring a Liquid Waste Batch Release Permit (see 6.4.1.a)
  • Miscellaneous editorial changes and corrections (no change bars) * {PN & Sl} Add information to various section for the addition of I-133. Surry Power Station North Anna Power Station Approved by: Approved by: . Pr2~edm:eChililgc-Scc Attached Pru: NLA Pr2ccdmChange-Se~

A~chcd Par NLA SNSOC Chairman Date SNSOC Chairman Date Approved by: Approved by: PrQ~edm:eChangc-Scc At.m~hcd :em: NlA PrQ!;;edureChangc-Sc~ At.mched Par NLA Station Manager Date Station Manager Date

  • Approved by: PrQ!;;edmChangc-Scc At.m~hcd Pm: NlA Vice President-Nuclear Operations Date
  • VIRGINIA POWER NORTH ANNA POWER STATION Procedure Action Request ADM21
  • VPAP-0502 . Instructions for completin this form are included in VPAP-0502
1. Procedure Number 2. Revision 3. Procedure Change Number VPAP-2103 5 PNl 4. Page 1 of 154 6. Expiration Date NIA 5. Procedure Title . \. Offsite Dose Calculation Manual 7. Type of Request New Procedure Procedure Change Procedure Rev is ion Procedure Deletion Vendor Procedure
8. Duration or Extent of Usage Permanent D Temporary D One Time Only 9. Reason For Change Incorporate response to N-94-610 and S-94-1058
10. Description of Change {PN & Sl} E-Par Add information to various section for the addition of I-133. NOTE: Station Manager must sign prior to implementation.
11. Requested By Name (Please Print) C. Tarantino
12. Date 5-19-94 13. If this PAR is for a deletion to an Administrative Procedure, enter the effective date of the deletion.

If this PAR is for a Procedure Change, the Cognizant Supervisor is not required to sign Block 15. The signature in Block 27 constitutes approval.

15. Lead/Responsible Dept. Cognizant Supervisor
16. Date (Signature)
procedure .Changes Only -Change *of Intent Checklist (Do any of the*tollowing statements
applyio the-procedure change?) 17. A change to the stated Purpose of the procedure.
18. A change in the stated Initial Conditions that must be satisfied prior to performing the procedure.
19. AchangehthestatedAcceptance Criteria that must be satisfied for satisfactory completion of the procedure.
20. A modification or deletion of setpoints, independent, or simultaneous verification.
21. A change that affects specific actions that are required to be accomplished to ensure the satisfactory completion of the task. This includes changes that affect personnel safety, decrease fire protection effectiveness, affect e ui ment ualification, or involve a less conservative method of erformin the task. 22. A change that relocates or deletes a required hold point. This does not include deleting a section of a procedure which includes a hold point. 23. A change to CAUTION or WARNING statements.

This does not include adding CAUTION or WARNING statements or deletin a section of a rocedure which includes CAUTION or WARNING statements.

24. A change that modifies or deletes the method for meeting a commitment identified in the procedure.
25. A change that results in a "Yes" answer to any of the questions on the PAR Activity Screening Checklist.
26. D Yes Ill No D Yes Ii No D Yes fJi No D Yes a No D Yes IIJ No D Yes Id No D Yes fij No rlJ Yes D No D Yes Ill No 0Yes Iii No ,:I Procedure Action Request / ~-~: :=~ ... ;** .. _.:: .\*~_-.'~

.;: .. ... / ;.~ A. Will this activity require a chanqe to the Technical Specifica~ions? Explain./',/~ 71ns /1/M /.S .e~~"'--0 Yes lfJ No ,,F-1 H "'" f' hrNr,4r,11,v c>F ,C.,/2 C lr:(-C,' ,., N" t'l't. /}-.i1,1CrN4kr"1/'

, 'I errl!~ YJ,'r! 7-/~* s.;,. 'r'Hr Ii! t'Q ... -,rNl'N/5.

c != r.s 4 h. ,,.,. z .. Tc s . .y,., "'* ~-, ""r,(" ~""~" n-* r,,e o,11t 11 19.u,11 11 ill ~P ,*.~r-.n e.vr /.c.:e, .. -~.,,i ,.v "'"' r.~. A-JJh,-'J.. ct 1 Pr1&1:.s St'trr, C .~. 't. l:. .ft, t~ **_w $t.'.l!vr, " *1.vlJt'/l 7"u,. o~,,1,r. * *. ¥ 7 o.. D Yes tlJ. No 8. Does this activity involve a revision to design bases? Explain. Ive.' /l f' vr5H;.IIS 7e1 /J l'S/6,c) 6/f.u.:, 1.vt-1.v,dN). C. Does this activity involve a temporary modification? Explain. D Yes fl No D. Does this activity involve a change to the Environmental Protedion Plan or a change, test, or D Yes m No experiment that may affedthe environment? Explain. Ale,' t'JUJ.c,l(,f Tc, Tt1P t'Ah,'r/(01t11,eq;t~ ! ll,, n, r,v .v /,A..v. ;OCJ tt /1,tJ .t.;;e5 res,s u,1_ t',;c,,fl'rrt ,~ t""'-JTS ThA-r Hl"'I-Y err~£"7" I I Tiff' ~M,.,1dol'T e;t,, 7 1..tlv()"' 11r;;. IZfflUt:C.F.RJSO'JSS!,11(tPe.Vt2iW.Ist:ffilri . : .*. ' . 'B. 'iC.&nr*t.~mffimriitio.niniffilidHtfYP.'A.B.famni

+ttm A. Does the change physically modify the facility as described in the Safety Analysis Report? Explain and D Yes fll No indicate Safety Analysis Report documents/sections reviewed.

P<-' jJ rtY s,,e~ ..... ;,,~"' r, ti Ar,-()JJ:; )-r) T1>t( .l=l'rer'-'TY I.Alv&1.,..,.,~"; I'}:, /1~.sc..,2,&cu ,_ .S:Ad. /f~~17t1Jt.V tir Pv<f,. .. ,tJC r~,t.. ,.i,'(tv:i,ot() .~ ,:,.e;:;*,re-l)osc l'~e._,...,.,..,gu.J.:, ~'"'<..>-. 12.. 8. Does the change modify procedures, methods of operation, or alter a test or experiment as described in D Yes the Safety Analysis Report? Explain and indicate Safety Analysis Report documents/sections reviewed . .,..,.J.,,:fs CF C)~t"xArcc,,,C). Tf'S'r ",e l!',t.~<.(:.n,e~ ~s /)r!"&c.d1~U)

."1 r1re-S/9,e A-<e , A.;1.!; ;I c.n/l.ied Od. t hl1~~~, C. Does the change modify safety related strudures, systems, equipment, or components not described D Yes II No in the Safety Analysis Report? Explain and indicate Safety Analysis Report documents/sections reviewed. ,l()c, S'/}rf'ry

/( 'f1-Art"/} .5°Tllvtrv~e /uJ,:J, r,tAr,~.vS T!Mr /f/lf /Vt";""' ,f) l'.>l'te1A?t"LJ 1-e; Tift' S, A ,12, /I~ t' /Alv&11,ilr,t). /)-~,() /rttJ,V Cr ~v~u,U /&(J,t... (/,&,&$"~ ~Uj~ l!A-t:°vt:.,Ar,uu.lS (.'.~I..,*. D. Does the change perform a test or experiment that is not described in the Safety Analysis Report? D Yes (d No Explain and indicate Safety Analysis Report documents/sedions reviewed. Tes;-/r.vtJ/.*,t f'lol~t-.f't./He,<,1r5

Uor' ~l'~<.-~;~"~

1.,u ;,-,~ S,-t,C h-'1' M.-;** /t~re,e~. E. Will operation of another system that is described in the Safety Analysis Report be adversely affecied D Yes !rl No as a result of this change? Explain and indicate Safety Analysis Report documents/sections reviewed . .I.I-.' . )\ ,JJ ,., .. .J .,,. ,r .... ~,.,... 'f!,&,&f'I'/:, 0/U t:'7,-,f',t. .S7S'rt'HS ~,, /(!l'Sv:.r ";::-Trr,.s fl'fA...,'6C.

6. Date 8. Title Reviewer Signature
10. Date Key: PAR-Procedure Action Request Form No. 730682 (July 93) (Back) : I i I 'I
  • VIRGINIA POWER Procedure Action Request ADM21 *** VPAP-0502 Instructions for comoletin this form are included in VPAP-0502
1. Procedure Number 2. Revision 3. Procedure Change Number 4. Page VPAP-2103 5 PSI 1 of 154 5. Pro~edure Title Offsite Dose Calculation Manual 6. Expiration Date NIA 7. Type of Request New Procedl.U'e Procedure Olange Procedure Revision Procedure Deletion Vendor Procedl.U'e
8. Duration or Extent of Usage Permanent . 0Temporary D One Time Only 9. Reason For Change Incorporate response to N-94-610 and S-94-1058
10. Description of Change {PN & SI} E-Par Add information to various section for the addition of IH33. ENTERED EY NOTE: Station Manager must sign prior to implementation.

\ I *Ml 261994 t

  • WGS 11. Requested By Name (Please Print) C. Tarantino
12. Date 5-19-94 13. If this PAR is tor a deletion to an Administrative Procedure, enter the effective date of the deletion.

If this PAR is tor a Procedure Change, the Cognizant Supervisor is not required to sign Block 15. The signature in Block 27 constitutes approval.

17. A change to the stated Purpose of the procedure.
15. Lead/Responsible Dept. Cognizant Supervisor
16. Date (Signature)
18. A change in the stated Initial Conditions that must be satisfied prior to performing the procedure.

1 s: AchangehthestatedAcceptance Criteria that must be satisfied tor satisfactory completion of the procedure.

20. A modification or deletion of setpoints, independent, or simultaneous verification.

D Yes rn No 21. A change that affects specific actions that are required to be accomplished to ensure the satisfactory completion of the task. This includes changes that affect personnel safety, decrease fire protection effectiveness. affect eQuioment aualification, or involve a less conservative method of erformin the task. 22. A change that relocates or deletes a required hold point. This does not include deleting a section of a rocedure which includes a hold coint. 23. A change to CAUTION or WARNING statements. This does not include. adding CAUTION or WARNING statements or deletino a section of a rocedure which includes CAUTION or WARNING statements.

24. A change that modifies or deletes the method for meeting a commitment identified in the procedure.
25. A change that results in a "Yes" answer to any of the questions on the PAR Activity Screening Checklist.
26. I D Yes~ No Oves No No
  • Procedure Action Request C. Does this adivity involve a temporary modification?

Explain. I . No

  • rt>b~*'41iu-v
~ ~"volv.e.J j"' r-t3 3 do~ ult;AtlP..~~

0 Yes (a-No D. Does this adivity involve a change to the Environmental Protedion Plan or a change, test, or D Yes EfNo ~erime"it!1,1;ay affed the environment? Expla}'} 1. .L. ./--rh~> ().t;~',v*7 in\/ull.£&.s ~O &"'-i,t A,\,A~t1~e&f ~vecv.f' r1(.IIV.._ A. Does the change physically modify the facility as described in the Safety Analysis Report? Explain and D Yes (3-N"o i~cate Safety Analysis Report docµments/sections r~viewfild. . { f J , L ..L. [ kb .L * \Yl~5 i S 1io cf\G,,/.,.ck_ !-{31 ;~-rl-t. ciDS£.~tM.~1=~. fVu {"?~~o"),~l:1'1-f..$ ~t,~~~h. . C. Does the change modify safety related strudures, systems, equipment, or components not described D Yes B'No in the Safety Analysis Report? Explain and indicate Safety Analysis Report docum,tnts/sections reviewed. .f._ No W\O~~-11-: .s ~-ck t; ().i' $1.f}' t:,z,~-k,d ~l-.'P4T-J, 1/5~, ,1 ~:r* 0 1-~r 0~'3'. D. Does the change perform a test or experiment that is not described in the Safety Analysis Report? *o Yes No Explain and indicate Safety Analysis Report documents/sections reviewed. No ot-""i'~: ... -t s 1"volv~d z.., ih;s o-~1"*~ . E. Will operation of another system that is described in the Safety Analysis Report be adversely affeded D Yes as a result ol ~his ~ge? Explain and il'ldicate Safety Analysis Report documents/seqtions reviewed. t\H t.Ul:~1].' i, ID '".:;lw.k. !-(13 c.A\'"'["'l*-. ~" Hf f'°~.e:s-. t-Jo *~ ~* ; , ~I\ -ll. S tx-1W'. , :mifl~~lf .. i§'-tff;;,,,;;:,.,:;::;;;,;,j£MltJf:----Ill]li.lJM~;11ft!im,,.1!1t;;fffJ@

3. Preparer Name (Please Print) y)~ tJ ~. \AO 4. Title l,{'f.S"i

£, 15 5. Preparer Signature

9. Reviewer Signature fl)} f)J Key: PAA*Pracedure Action Request 6. Date B. Title 10. Date NI-A Form No. 730682 (July 93) (Baclt)
  • * *
  • Level 2 Controlled Distribution Maintained by this Department Do not remove this document for field work Station Administrative Procedure

.. VIRGINIA POWER © 1994 by Virginia Power. All Rights Reserved Title: Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Lead Department: Radiological Protection Procedure Number Revision Number Effective Date VPAP-2103 6 12/01/94 Revision Summary

  • Reference commitment 3.2.2 in Step 6.6.1.a.2 and.Attachment 23 to ensure the commitment is not deleted at a later date.
  • Correct page nwnberreferenced in Attachment6 page I ofS definitions fi and Ai. Add definition of"2I in equation Ai on Attachment 6 page 2 of 5.
  • On Attachment 7 corrected "Total Body Ai and Critical Organ Ai" to "Total Body Bi and Liver Bi".
  • Added alphabetic identifiers to first three items in first column on Attachment IO and I I.
  • Changed note 1 on Attachment 17 page 3 of 3 from "Automatic isolation of this pathway" to "Automatic actuation of the valves in this path way".
  • Change step 6. 7 .2.a.3 to include classification of unplanned liquid and gaseous effluent releases for the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report.
  • Delete Bi-monthly River Water samples from Attachment 22 page 3 of 4.
  • Change location of sample points for Oysters.
  • Delete sediment-requirements at Burwell's Bay and Newport News
  • Delete sample point of clams at Jamestown.

The number of required samples wa<; reduced from 5 to 4.

  • Change collection frequency for fish and invertebrates in sections a and b on Attachment 20 page 2 of 3 from Bi-monthly to Semi-Annually.
  • Correct distance location ofTI..D on Attachment 22 page I of 4 from .33 to .29 miles.
  • Incorporate PN&S I. Change equipment mark numbers to new format.
  • Changed Attachments 14 and 16 to include mark numbers for VG-RM-104 and ventilation flow rate monitors.

Surry Power Station North Anna Power Station Apprc5vecl" :>y: I Approved by: I \ ii . 7 -,: Kt--.__ H<~*CN ' -' '-/ rSNSq~ Chairman Date/ SNSOC Chairman Date I '-----" Al~d by, .,_ 1..L Approved by: .. ,~Qi(~* . .0/ZM~~ ~/-f,9y ' ./ V' Station Manager Date Station Manager Date Approved by: Rd= A'~ II-It -9f l. . . Vice President-Nuclear Operations Date Form No. 723758(Apr

91) /

VIRGINIA POWER Intentionally Blank VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE2 OF 156 * * **

  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1.0 PURPOSE 2.0 SCOPE

3.0 REFERENCES

/COMMITMENT DOCUMENTS

4.0 DEFINITIONS

5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES

6.0 INSTRUCTIONS

6.1 Sampling

and Monitoring Criteria 6.2 Liquid Radioactive Waste Effluents

6.2.1 Liquid

Effluent Concentration Limitations . 6.2.2 Liquid Monitoring Instrumentation

6.2.3 Liquid

Effluent Dose Limit 6.2.4 Liquid Radwaste Treatment

6.2.5 Liquid

Sampling 6.3 Gaseous Radioactive Waste Effluents

6.3.1 Gaseous

Effluent Dose Rate Limitation 6_.3.2 Gaseous Monitoring Instrumentation

6.3.3 Noble

Gas Effluent Air Dose Limit VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 3 OF 156 Page 7 7 8 9 13 15 15 15 15 16 20 23 24 24 24 27 30 6.3.4 1-131, 1-133, H-3, and Radionuclides In Particulate Form Effluent Dose Limit 33 6.3.5 Gaseous Radwaste Treatment 36 6.4 Radioactive Liquid and Gaseous Release Permits 38 6.4.1 Liquid Waste Batch Release Permits 38 6.4.2 Continuous Release Permit 39 6.4.3 Waste Gas Decay Tanlc (WGDT) Release Permit 39 6.4.4 Reactor Containment Release Permits 40 6.4.5 Miscellaneous Gaseous Release Permit 40 VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE4 OF 156 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Section P.age 6.4 Radioactive Liquid and Gaseous Release Permits (continued)

6.4.6 Radioactive

Liquid and Gaseous Release Controls 40 6.5 Total Dose Limit to Public From Uranium Fuel Cycle Sources 41 6.6 Radiological Environmental Monitoring 43 6.6.1 Monitoring Program 43 6.6.2 Land Use Census 45 6.6.3 Interlaboratory Comparison Program 46 6.7 Reporting Requirements 47 6.7.1 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report 47 6.7.2 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 48 6.7.3 Annual Meteorological Data 49 6.7.4 Changes to the ODCM 50 7.0 RECORDS 51 ATTACHMENTS I Surry Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation 53 2 North Anna Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation 55 3 Surry Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation 57

  • Surveillance Requirements 4 North Anna Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation 59 Surveillance Requirements 5 Liquid Ingestion Pathway Dose Factors for Surry Station Units 1 and 2 61 6 North Anna Liquid Ingestion Pathway Dose Factor Calculation Units 1 and 2 63 7 North Anna Liquid Pathway Dose Commitment Factors for Adults 69 8 Surry Radioactive Liquid Waste Sampling and Analysis Program 71 9 North Anna Radioactive Liquid Waste Sampling and Analysis Program 75 IO Surry Radioactive Gaseous Waste Sampling and Analysis Program 79 11 North Anna Radioactive Gaseous Waste Sampling and Analysis Program 85 ' 12 Gaseous Effluent Dose Factors for Surry 89 13 Gaseous Effluent Dose Factors for North Anna 93 * * *
  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER Section TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

ATTACHMENTS (continued) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 5 *OF 156 Page 14 Surry Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation 97 15 North Anna Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation 99 16 Surry Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation 105 Surveillance Requirements 17 North Anna Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation 107 Surveillance Requirements 18 Critical Organ and Inhalation Dose Factors for Surry 111 19 Critical Organ Dose Factors for North Anna 113 20 Surry Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 115 21 North Anna Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 119 22 Surry Environmental Sampling Locations 125 23 North Anna Environmental Sampling Locations 129 24 Detection Capabilities for Surry Environmental Sample Analysis 133 25 Detection

  • capabilities for North Anna Environmental Sample Analysis 26 Reporting Levels for Radioactivity Concentrations in Environmental Samples at Surry 135 137 27 Reporting Levels for Radioactivity Concentrations in Environmental 139 Samples at North Anna 28 Surry Meteorological, Liquid, and Gaseous Pathway Analysis 141 29 North Anna Meteorological, Liquid, and Gaseous Pathway Analysis 149 i VIRGINIA . POWER Intentionally Blank VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 6 OF 156 * * *
  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 7 OF 156 1.0 PURPOSE The Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) establishes requirements for the Radioactive Effluent and Radiological Environmental Monitoring Programs.

Methodology and parameters are provided to. calculate offsite doses resulting from radioactive gaseous and liquid effluents, to calculate gaseous and liquid effluent monitoring alann/trip setpoints, and to conduct the Environmental Monitoring Program. Requirements are established for the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report and the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report required by Station Technical Specifications. Calculation of off site doses due to radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents are performed to assure that:

  • Concentration of radioactive liquid effluents to the unrestricted area will be limited to ten
  • times the effluent concentration values of 10 CPR 20, Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2, for radionuclides other than dissolved or entrained noble gases and 2E-4 µCi/ml for dissolved or entrained noble gases.
  • Exposure to the maximum exposed member of the public in the unrestricted area from radioactive liquid effluents will not result in doses greater than* the liquid dose limits of 10 CPR 50, Appendix I
  • Dose.rate at and beyond the site boundary from radioactive gaseous effluents will be limited to: ** Noble gases -less than or equal to a dose rate of 500 rnrem/yr to the total body and less than or equal to a dose rate of 3000 rnrem/yr to the skin ** 1 131 , 1 133 , and H 3 , and all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days -less than or equal to a dose rate of 1500 rnrem/yr to any organ
  • Exposure from radioactive gaseous effluents to the maximum exposed member of the public in the. unrestricted area will not result in doses greater t_han the gaseous dose limits of 10 CPR 50, Appendix I, and
  • Exposure tCJ a r~al individual will not exceed 40 CPR 190 dose limits 2.0 SCOPE This procedure applies to the Radioactive Effluent and Environmental Monitoring Programs at Surry and North Anna Stations .

VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 8 OF f56

3.0 REFERENCES

/COMMITMENT DOCUMENTS

3.1 References

3.1.1 10 CFR 20, Standards for Protection Against Radiation 3.1.2 10 CFR 50, Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities 3.1.3 40 CFR 190, Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Nuclear Power Operations 3.1.4 TID-14844, Calculation of Distance Factors for Power and Test Reactor Sites 3.1.5 Regulatory Guide 1.21, Measuring, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactivity in Solid

  • Wastes and Releases of Radioactive Materials in Liquid and Gaseous Effluents from Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants, Rev. 1, U.S. NRC, June 1974 3.1.6 Regulatory Guide 1.109, Calculation of Annual Doses to Man From Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance With 10 CFR 50, Appendix I, Rev. 1, U.S. NRC, October 1977 3.1.7 Regulatory Guide* 1.111, Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water-Cooled Reactors, Rev. 1, U.S. NRC, July 1977 3.1.8 Surry and North Anna Technical Specifications (Units 1 and 2)
  • 3.1.9 NUREG-0324, XOQDOQ, Program for the Meteorological Evaluation of Routine
  • Effluent Releases at Nuclear Power Stations, U.S. NRC, September 1977 3.1.10 NUREG/CR-1276, Users Manual for the LADTAP II Program, U.S. NRC, May, 1980 3.1.11 NUREG-0597, User's Guide to GASPAR Code, U.S. NRC, June, 1980 3.1.12 Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position on Environmental Monitoring, November, 1979, Rev. 1 3.1.13 NUREG-0133, Preparation of Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications for Nuclear Power Stations, October, 1978 3.1.14 NUREG-0543, February 1980, Methods for Demonstrating LWR Compliance With the EPA Uranium Fuel Cycle Standard ( 40 CFR Part 190) 3.1.15 NUREG-0472, Standard Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications for Pressurized Water Reactors, Rev. 3, March 1982 3.1.16 Environmental Measurements Laboratory, DOE HASL 300 Manual 3.1.17 NRC Generic Letter 89-01, Implementation of Programmatic Controls for Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications (RETS) in the Administrative Controls Section of the Technical Specifications and the Relocation of Procedural Details of RETS to the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual or to the Process Control Program 3.1.18 UFSAR (Surry and North Anna) *
  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 9 OF 156 3.1.19 Nuclear Reactor Environmental Radiation Monitoring Quality Control Manual, IWL-0032-361 3.1.20 VP AP-2802, Notifications and Reports 3.1.21 NAPS Circulating Water System Modifications
a. DC-85-37-1 Unit 1 b. DC-85-38-2 lJnit 2 3.2 Commitment Documents

3.2.1 Quality

Assurance Audit Report Number C 90-22, Management Safety Review Committee, Observation 03C, January 17, 1991 3.2.2 Quality Assurance Audit Report Number 91-03, Observation 08N 3.2.3 Quality Assurance Audit Report Number 92-03, Observation 02N 3.2.4 Quality Assurance Audit Report Number 92-03, Observation 04NS (Item 2) 4.0 DEFINITIONS

4.1 Channel

Calibration Adjustment, as necessary, of the channel output so it responds with the necessary range and accuracy to known values of the parameter the channel monitors. It encompasses the entire channel, including the sensor and alarm and/or trip functions and the Channel Functional Test. The Channel Calibration can be performed by any series of sequential, overlapping, or total channel steps so the entire channel is calibrated.

4.2 Channel

Check A qualitative assessment, by observation, of channel behavior during operation. This assessment includes, where possible, comparison of the. channel indication and/or status with other indications and/or status derived from independent instrumentation channels measuring the same parameter.

4.3 Channel

Functional Test There are two types of Channel Functional Tests. 4.3.1 Analog Channel Injection of a simulated signal into a channel, as close to the sensor as practicable, to verify Operability, including alarm and/or trip functions . VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 10 OF 156 4.3 Channel Functional Test (continued) 4.3.i"

  • Bistable Channel Injection of a simulated signal into a sensor to verify Operability, including alarm and/ or trip functions.

4.4 Critical

Organ That organ, which has been determined to be the maximum exposed organ based on an effluent pathway analysis, thereby ensuring the dose and dose rate limitations to any organ will not be exceeded. 4.5 Dose Equivalent 1-131 That concentration of 1 131 (microcurie/gram) that ~one would produce the same thyroid dose as the quantity and isotopic mixture of 1 131 , 1 132 , 1 133 , 1 134 , and 1 135 actually present. Thyroid dose conversion factors for this calculation are listed in Table ill of TID-14844, Calculation of Distance Factors for Power and Test Reactor Sites. Thyroid dose conversion factors from NRC Regulatory Guide 1.109, Revision 1, may be used (Surry). 4.6 Frequency Notations NOTE: Frequencies are allowed a maximum extension of 25 percent. NOTATION FREQUENCY D -Dai~y W-Weekly M-Monthly Q -Quarterly SA -Semi-annually R -Refueiing SIU -Start-up P -Prior to rele*ase N.A. -Not ap~licable DR -During the release At least once per 24 hours At least once per 7 days At least once per 31 days At least once per 92 days At least once per 184 days At least once per 18 months Prior to each reactor start-up Completed prior to each release Not applicable At least once during each release * * *

  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 11 OF 156 4.7 Gaseous Radwaste Treatment System A system that reduces radioactive gaseous effluents by collecting primary coolant system off gases from the primary system and providing delay or holdup to reduce total radioactivity prior to release to the environment.

The system comprises the waste gas decay tanks, regenerative heat exchanger, waste gas charcoal filters, process vent blowers, waste gas surge tanks, and waste gas diaphragm compressor (North Anna). 4.8 General Nomenclature 4.9 4.10 x = Chi: concentration at a point at a given instant (curies per cubic meter) D = Deposition: quantity of deposited radioactive material per unit area (curies per square meter) Q = Source strength (instantaneous; grams, curies) = Emission rate (continuous; grams per second, curies per second) = Emission rate (continuous line source; grams per second per meter) Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) The smallest concentration ofradioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count (above system background) that can be detected with 95 percent probability with only 5 percent probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal. Members of the Public Individuals who, by virtue of their occupational status, have no formal association with the Station. This category includes non-employees of Virginia Power who are permitted to use portions of the site for recreational, occupational, or other purposes not associated with Station functions. This category does not include non-employees such as vending machine servicemen or postal workers who, as part of their formal job function, occasionally enter an area that is controlled by Virginia Power to protect individuals from exposure to radiation and radioactive materials. 4.11 Operable -Operability A system, subsystem, _train, component, or device is operable or has operability when it is capable of performing its specified functions and all necessary, attendant instrumentation, controls, normal and emergency electrical power sources, cooling or seal water, lubrication or other auxiliary equipment that are required for the* system, subsystem, train, component, or device to perform its functions are also capable of performing their related support functions . VIRGINIA POWER 4.12 Purge -Purging VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 12 OF 156 Controlled discharge of air or gas from a confinement to ~aintain temperature, pressure, humidity, concentration, or other operating condition, so that replacement air or gas is required to purify the confinement. 4.13 Rated Thermal Power Total reactor core heat transfer rate to reactor coolant.

  • Surry-2441 Megawatt Thermal (MWt)
  • North Anna -2893 MWt 4.14 Site Boundary The line beyond which Virginia Power does not own, lease, or otherwise control the land. 4.15 Source Check A qualitative assessment of channel response when a channel sensor is exposed to radiation.

This applies to installed radiation monitoring systems. 4.16 Special Report A report to NRC to comply with Subsections 6.2, 6.3, or 6.5 of this procedure. Also refer to VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports. 4.17 Thermal Power Total reactor core heat transfer rate to the reactor coolant. 4.18 Unrestricted Area Any area at or beyond the site boundary, access to which is neither limited nor controlled by Virginia Power for purposes of protection of individuals from exposure to radiation and radioactive ~aterials, or any area within the site boundary used for residential quarters or for industrial, commercial, institutional or recreational purposes.

  • * *
  • *
  • VIRGJNIA POWER 4.19 Ventilation Exhaust Treatment System VPAP-2103 REVISION 6
  • PAGE 13 OF 156 A system that reduces gaseous radioiodine or radioactive material in particulate f~rm in
  • effluents by passing ventilation or vent exhaust gases through charcoal adsorbers and High Efficiency Particulate

~ir (HEPA) filters to remove iodines and particulates from a gaseous exhaust stream prior to release to.the environment (such a system is not considered to have any effect on noble gas effluents). Engineered Safety Feature (ESF) atmospheric cleanup systems are not Ventilation Exhaust Treatment System components.

5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES

5.1 Superintendent

Radiological Protection The Superintendent Radiological Protection is responsible for: 5.1.1 Establishing and maintaining procedures for surveying, sampling, and monitoring radioactive effluents and the environment. 5.1.2 Surveying, sampling, and analyzing plant effluents and environmental monitoring, and documenting these activities.*

5.1.3 Analyzing

plant effluent trends and recommending actions to correct adverse trends . 5.1.4 Preparing Effluent and Environmental Monitoring Program records. 5.2 Superintendent Operations The Superintendent Operations is responsible for requesting samples, analyses, and authorization to release effluents . VIRGINIA POWER Intentionally Blank VPAP-2103. REVISION 6 PAGE 14 OF 156 * * **

  • *
  • VIRGINIA.

VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 15 OF 156 6.0 POWER INSTRUCTIONS NOTE: Meteorological, liquid, and gaseous pathway ~nalyses are presented in Attachments 28 and 29, Meteorological, Liquid, and Gaseous Pathway Analysis.

6.1 Sampling

and Monitoring Criteria 6.1.1 Surveys, sampling, and analyses shall use instruments calibrated for the type and range of radiation monitored and the type of discharge monitored.

6. J .2 Installed monitoring systems shall be calibrated for the type and range of radiation or parameter monitored.

6.1.3 A sufficient number of survey points shall be used or samples taken to adequately assess the status of the discharge monitored.

6.1.4 Samples

shall be representative of the volume and type of discharge monitored. 6.1.5 Surveys, sampling, analyses, and monitoring records shall be accurately and legibly documented, and sufficiently detailed that the meaning and intent of the records are clear . 6: 1.6 Surveys, analyses, and monitoring records shall be reviewed for trends, completeness, and accuracy.

6.2 Liquid

Radioactive Waste Effluents

6.2.1 Liquid

Effluent Concentration Limitations a: Liquid waste concentrations discharged from the Station shall not exceed the following limits: 1. For radionuclides (other than dissolved or entrained noble gases), liquid effluent concentrations released to unrestricted areas shall not exceed ten times the effluent concentration values specified in 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2. 2. For dissolved or entrained noble gases, concentrations shall not exceed 2E-4 µCi/ml. b. If the concentration of liquid effluent exceeds the limits in 6.2.1.a., promptly reduce concentrations to within limits . VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 16 OF 156 6.2.1 Liquid Effluent Concentration Limitations (continued)

c. Daily concentrations of radioactive materials liquid waste released to unrestricted areas shall meet the following:

Volume of Waste Discharged+ Volume of Dilution Water> 1 (l) * µCi/ml. -Volume of Waste Discharged x }2 ACW.1 i 1 where: µCi/mli = the concentration of nuclide i in the liquid effluent discharge ACWi = ten times the effluent concentration value in unrestricted areas of nuclide i, expressed as µCi/ml from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2 for radionuclides other than noble gases, and 2E-4 µCi/ml for dissolved or entrained noble gases 6.2.2 Liquid Monitoring Instrumentation

a. Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown on Attachments 1 and 2, Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation, shall be operable with their alarm/trip setpoints set to ensure that 6.2.1.a. limits are not exceeded.
1. Alarm/trip setpoints of these channels shall be determined and adjusted in accordance with 6.2.2.d., Setpoint Calculation.
2. If a radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel alarm/trip setpoint is less conservative than required by 6.2.2.a., perform one of the following:
  • Promptly suspend release of radioactive liquid effluents monitored by the affected channel
  • Declare the channel inoperable
  • Change the setpoint to an acceptable, conservative value * *
  • VIRGINIA VPAP-2103 POWER REVISION 6 PAGE 17 OF 156
  • b. Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Operability
  • ** Each radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated operable by performing a Channel Check, Source Check, Channel Calibration, and Channel Functional Test at the frequencies shown in Attachments 3 and 4, Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Surveillance Requirements.
1. If the number.of operable channels is less than the minimum required by the tables in Attachment 1 or 2, perform the action shown in those tables. 2. Attempt to return the instruments to operable status within 30 days. If unsuccessful, explain in the next Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report why the inoperability was not corrected in a timely manner. c. Appli~able Monitors Liquid effluent monitors for which alarm/trip setpoints shall be determined are: Release Point Instrument Number North Anna Surry Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line 1-LW-RM-111 NIA* Service Water Sys~em Effluent Line l-SW-RM-108 l-SW-RM-107 A, B,C,D Condenser Circulating Water Line l-SW-RM-130 l-SW-RM-120 2-SW-RM-230 2-SW-RM-220 Radwaste Facility Effluent Line NIA l-RRM-RITS-131 VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 18 OF 156 6.2.2 Liquid Monitoring Instrumentation ( continued)
d. Setpoint Calculation NOTE: This methodology does not preclude use of more conservative setpoints.
1. Maximum setpoint values shall be calculated by: s -where: S = the setpoint, in µCi/ml, of the radioactivity monitor measuring the radioactivity concentration in the effluent line prior to dilution C = the effluent concentration limit for the monitor used to implement 10 CFR 20 for the Station, in µCi/ml FE = maximum design pathway effluent flow rate F 0 = dilution water flow rate calculated as: (Surry) D =FE+ (200,000 gpm x number of circ. pumps in service) (2) (N. Anna) D =FE+ (218,000 gpm x number of circ. pumps in service) 2. Each of the condenser circulating water channels (Surry: SW-120, SW-220) (North Anna: SW-130, SW-230) monitors the effluent (service water, including component cooling service water, circulating water, and liquid radwaste) in the circulating water discharge tunnel beyond the last point of possible radioactive material addition.

No dilution is assumed for this pathway. Therefore, Equation (2) becomes: S=C The setpoint for Station monitors used to implement 10 CFR 20 for the site becomes the effluent concentration limit. (3) 3. In addition, for added conservatism, setpoints shall be calculated for the liquid rad waste effluent line (North Anna: L W-111 ), the service water system effluent line (Surry: SW-107 A, B, C, and.D, North Anna: SW-108), and the Radwaste Facility effluent line (Surry: RRM-131).

  • * *
  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER 4. For the liquid radwaste effluent line, Equation (2) becomes: s = where: VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 19 OF 156 (4) KLw = The fraction of the effluent concentration limit, used to implement 10 CFR 20 for the site, attributable to the liquid radwaste effluent line pathway 5. For the service water system effluent line, Equation (2) becomes: s = (5) where: Ksw = The fraction of the effluent concentration limit, used to implement 10 CFR 20 for the Static:m, attributable to the service water effluent line pathway 6. For the Radwaste Facility effluent line, Equation (2) becomes: s = (6) where: KRw = The fraction of the effluent concentration limit, used to implement 10 CFR 20 attributable to the Radwaste Facility effluent line . pathway 7. Th~ sum KLw + Ksw + KRw shall not be greater than 1.0 .

VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 20 OF i56 6.2.3 Liquid Effluent Dose Limit a. Requirement At least once per 31 days, perform the dose calculations in 6.2.3.c. and 6.2.3.d. to ensure the dose or dose commitment to the maximum exposed member of the public from radioactive materials in liquid releases (from each reactor unit) to unrestricted areas is limited to: 1. During any calendar quarter:

  • Less than or equal to 1.5 mrem to the total body
  • Less than or equal to 5 mrem to the critical organ 2. During any calendar year:
  • Less than or equal to 3 mrem to the total body
  • Less than or equal to 10 mrem to the critical organ b. Action If the calculated dose from release of radioactive materials "in liquid effluents exceeds any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the NRC, within 30 days, a special report in accordance with VP AP-2802, Notifications and Reports, that identifies causes for exceeding limits and defines corrective actions taken to reduce releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents to ensure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits. c. Surry Dose Contribution Calculations NOTE: Thyroid and GI-LLI organ doses must be calculated to determine which is the critical organ for the period being considered.

Dose contributions shall be calculate9 for all radionuclides identified in liquid effluents released to unrestricted areas based on the equation: where: D = tFM""c.A. k,,J I 1 Subscripts = i, refers to individual radionuclide (7) * * *

  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER D = t = M = F = VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 21 OF 156 the cumulative dose commitment to the total body or critical organ from the liquid effluents for the period t. in mrem the period for which q and F are averaged for all liquid releases, in hours the mixing ratio (reciprocal of the dilution factor) at the point of exposure, dimensionless, 0_.2 from Appendix I IA, Surry UFSAR the neiµ-field average dilution factor for q during any liquid effluent release; the ratio of the average undiluted liquid waste "flow during release to the average flow from the site discharge structure to unrestricted areas q = the average concentration of radionuclide, i, in undiluted liquid effluent during the period t, from all liquid releases, in µCi/ml Ai = the site-related ingestion dose commitment factor to the total body or critical organ of an adult for each identified principal gamma and beta emitter in mrem-ml per hr-µCi. Values for Ai are given in Attachment 5, Liquid Ingestion Pathway Dose Factors For Surry Power Station. A. = 1.14 E+05 (21BF. + 5BI.) DF. 1 1 1 1 where: 1.14 E+o5 = 1 E+o6 pCi/µCi x 1 E+03 rnl/kg/(8760 hr/yr), units conversion factor 21 = adult fish consumption, kg/yr, from NUREG-0133 5 = adult invertebrate consumption, kg/yr, from NUREG-0133 Bli = the bioaccumulation factor for nuclide i, in invertebrates, pCi/kg per pCi/1, from Table A-1 of Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1 (8) BFi = the bioaccumulation factor for nuclide i, in fish, pCi/kg per pCi/1, from Table A-1 of Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1 DFi = the critical organ dose conversion factor for nuclide i, for adults, in mrem/pCi, from Table E-11 of Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1 * .

. VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 22 OF 156 6.2.3 Liquid Effluent Dose Limit (continued)

  • d. North Anna Dose Contribution Calculations NOTE: Attachment 6, North Anna Liquid Ingestion Pathway Dose Factor Calculation provides the derivation for Equation (9). Dose contribution shall be calculated for all radionuclides identified in liquid effluents released to unrestricted areas based on: D = ~Q.xB. ,L,,J 1 1 1 Where: Subscripts

= i, refers to individual radionuclide (9) D = the cumulative dose commitment to the total body or critical organ from the liquid effluents for the period t, in mrem

  • Bi = Dose Commitment Factors (mrem/Ci) for adults. Values for Bi are provided in Attachment 7, North Anna Liquid Ingestion Pathway Dose Commitment
  • Factors for Adults Qj = Total released activity for the considered period and the ith nuclide Q. = txC.xWasteFlow 1 1 (10) Where: t = the period for which Ci and F are averaged for all liquid releases, in hours Ci = the average concentration ofradionuclide, i, in undiluted liquid effluent during the period, t, from any liquid releases, in µCi/ml . . e. Quarterly Composite Analyses For radionuclides not determined in each batch or weekly composite, dose contribution to current monthly or calendar quarter cumulative summation may be approximated by assuming an average monthly concentration based on previous monthly or quarterly composite analyses.

However, for reporting purposes, calculated dose contribution shall be based on the actual composite analyses . *

  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 23 OF 156 6.2.4 Liquid Radwaste Treatment
a. Requirement
1. The Liquid Radwaste Treatment System and/or the Surry Radwaste Facility Liquid Waste System shall be used to reduce the radioactive materials in liquid waste prior to discharge when projected dose due to liquid effluent.

from each reactor unit, to unrestricted areas would exceed 0.06 mrem to total pody or 0.2 mrem to the critical organ in a 31-day period. 2. Doses due to liquid releases shall be projected at least once per 31 days. b. Action If radioactive liquid waste is discharged without treatment and in excess of the . *above limits prepare and submit to the NRC, within 30 days, a special report in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports, that includes th~ following:

1. An explanation of why liquid rad waste was being discharged without treatment, identification of any inoperable equipment or sub-system, and the reason for the in operability . 2. Actions taken to restore inoperable equipment to operable status. 3. Summary description of actions taken to prevent recurrence.
c. Projected Total Body Dose Calculation
1. Determine DTB, the total body dose from liquid effluents in the previous 31-day period, per Equation (7) or Equation (9) (Surry and North Anna, respectively).
2. Estimate R 1 , the ratio of the estimated volume of liquid effluent releases in the present 31-day period to the volume released in the previous 31-day period. 3. Estimate F 1 , the ratio of the estimated liquid effluent radioactivity concentration in the present 31-day period to liquid effluent concentration in the previous 31-day period (µCi/ml).
  • 4. Determine PDrn, the.projected total body dose in a 31-day period. (11)

VIRGINIA

  • POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 24 OF 156 6.2.4 Liquid Radwaste Treatment (continued)
d. Projected Critical Organ Dose Calculation.

Historical data pertaining to the volumes and radioactivity of liquid effluents released in connection with specific Station functions, such as maintenance or refueling outages, shall be used in projections as appropriate.

1. Determine D 0 ," the critical organ dose from liquid effluents in the previous 31-day period, per Equation (7) or Equation (9) (Surry and North Anna, respectively).
2. Estimate R 1 as in 6.2.4.c.2.
3. Estimate F 1 as in 6.2.4.c.3.
4. Determine PD 0 = projected critical organ dose in a 31-day period. 6.2.5 Liquid Sampling (12) Radioactive liquid wastes shall be sampled and analyzed according to the sampling and analysis requirements in Attachments 8 and 9, Radioactive Liquid Waste
  • Sampling and Analysis Program (Surry and North Anna, respectively).

6.3 Gaseous

Radioactive Waste Effluents

6.3.1 Gaseous

Effluent Dose Rate Limitation

a. Requirement Dose rate due to radioactive materials released in gaseous effluents from the site to areas at and beyond the site boundary shall be limited to: 1. The dose rate limit for noble gases shall be .s 500 rnrem/year to the total body and .s 3000 rnrem/year to the skin. 2. The dose rate limit for I 1 31 , I 133 , for tritium, and for all radioactive materials in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days shall be :51500 rnrem/year to th*e critical organ. b. Action 1. If dose rates exceed 6.3.1.a. limits, promptly decrease the release r~te to within the above limits. * * *
  • * * ------------------------------

VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 .PAGE 25 OF 156 2. Dose rates due to noble gases in gaseous effluents shall be d~termined, continuously, to be within 6.3.1.a. limits. 3. Dose rates due to 1 131 , I 133 , tritium, ~d all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days, in gaseous effluents shall be determined to be within the above limits by obtaining representative samples and performing analyses in accordance with the sampling and analysis program specified on Attachments 10 and 11, Radioactive Gaseous Waste Sampling and Analysis Program .

VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103. REVISION 6 PAGE 26 OF 156 6.3.1 Gaseous Effluent Dose Rate Limitation (continued)

c. Calculations of Gaseous Effluent Dose Rates I. The dose rate limit for noble gases shall be determined to be within the limit by limiting the release rate to the lesser of: L[KivvQivv

+ KipvQipvl 500mrem/yr to the total body (13) i OR [(L. + l.lM. ) Q 1*vv + (L. + 1.lM. ) Q 1*pvl S 3000mrem/yr to the skin ,£.J lVV lVV tpv 1pv i (14) where: Subscripts = vv, refers to vent releases from the building ventilation vent, including Radwaste Facility Ventilation Vent; pv, refers to the vent releases from the process vent; i, refers to individual radionuclide Kivv* Kipv = The total body dose factor for ventilation vents or pro.cess vent release due to gamma emissions for each identified noble gas radionuclide i, in mrem/yr per Curie/sec. Factors are listed in Attachments 12 and 13, Gaseous Effluent Dose Factors (Surry and North Anna, respectively) Livv* Lipv = The skin dose factor for ventilation vents or process vent release due to beta emissions for each identified noble gas radionuclide i, in mrem/yr per Curie/sec. Factors are listed in Attachments 12 and 13 Mivv* Mipv = The air dose factor for ventilation vents or process vent release due to gamma emissions for each identified noble gas radionuclide, i, in mrad/yr per Curie/sec. Factors are listed in Attachments 12 and 13 QivvQipv = The release rate for ventilation vents or process vent of noble gas radionuclide i, in gaseous effluents in Curie/sec (per site) 1.1 = The unit conversion factor that converts air dose to skin dose, in mrem/mrad

  • * **
  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 27 OF 156 2. The dose rate limit for I 131 , I 133 , tritium, and for all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days, shall be determined to be within the limit by restricting the release rate to:* L[Pivv'2ivv

+ PipvQipv] 1500mrem/yrto the critical organ (15) i where: Pivv* Pipv = The critical orf:an dose factor for ventilation vents or process vent for I 131 , I 33 , H 3 , and all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days~ for the inhalation pathway, in mrem/yr per Curie/sec. Factors are listed in Attachments 12 and 13 = The release rate for ventilation vents or process vent of I 131 , I 133 , H 3 , and all radionuclides i, in particulate

  • form with lives greater than 8 days, in gaseous effluents in Curie/sec (per site) 3. All gaseous releases, not through the process vent, are considered ground level and shall be included in the determination of Qiw . 6.3.2 Gaseous Monitoring Instrumentation
a. Requirement
1. The radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Attachment 14 or 15, Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation, shall be operable with alarm/trip setpoints set to ensure that 6.3.1.a. noble gas limits are not exceeded.

Alarm/trip setpoints of these channels shall be determined and adjusted in accordance with 6.3.2.d. 2. Each radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated operable by Channel Checks, Source Checks, Channel Calibrations, and Channel Functional Tests at the frequencies shown in Attachment 16 or 17, Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Surveillance Requirements . VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 28 OF 156 6.3.2 Gaseous Monitoring Instrumentation (continued)

b. Action 1. If a radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel alarm/trip setpoint is less conservative than required by 6.3.2.a.l, promptly:
  • Suspend the release of radioactive gaseous effluents monitored by the affected channel and declare the channel inoperable
  • or
  • Change the setpoint so it is acceptably conservative
2. If the number of operable channels is less than the minimum required by tables in Attachment 14 and 15, take the action shown in those tables. 3. Return instruments to operable status within 30 days. If unsuccessful, explain in the next Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report why the inoperability was not corrected in a timely manner. c. Applicable Monitors Radioactive gaseous effluent monitors for which alarm/trip setpoints shall be determined are: Release Point Instrument Number North Anna Surry Process Vent 1-GW-RM-102 1-GW-RM-102 l-GW-RM-178-1 1-GW-RM-130-1 Condenser Air Ejector 1-SV-RM-121 1-SV-RM-111 2-SV-RM-221 2-SV-RM-211 Ventilation Vent A 1-VG-RM-104 NIA 1-VG-RM-179-1 Ventilation Vent B 1-VG-RM-113 NIA 1-VG-RM-180-1 Ventilation Vent No. 1 NIA 1-VG-RM-104 Ventilation Vent No. 2 NIA 1-VG-RM-110 1-VG-RM-131-1 Radwaste Facility Vent NIA RRM-101 * * *
  • * ** VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 29*0F 156 d. Setpoint Calculations L Setpoint calculations for each monitor listed in 6.3.2.c. shall maintain this relationship:

where: D = Dpv = Dcae = Dvv = D~D +D +D pv cae vv (16) Step 6.3.1.a. dose limits that implement 10 CPR 20 for the Station, mrem/yr The noble gas site boundary dose rate from process vent gaseous effluent releases, mrem/yr The noble gas site boundary dose rate from condenser air ejector gaseous effluent releases, mrem/yr The noble gas site boundary dose rate from: Surry: Summation of the Ventilation Vents 1, 2, and the Radwaste Facility vent gaseous effluent releases, mrem/yr North Anna:Summation of Ventilation. Vent A plus B gaseous effluent releases, mrem/yr VIRGINIA .. ,.,. POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 30 OF 156 2. Setpoint values shall be determined by: where: m = Cm = Rm = R x 2.12.E-03 m (17) The release pathway, process vent (pv), ventilation vent (vv) condenser air ejector (cae), or Radwaste Facility (rv) The effluent concentration limit implementing 6.3.1.a. for the Station, µCi/ml The release rate limit for pathway m determined from

  • methodology in 6.3.1.c., using Xe 133 as nuclide to be released, µCi/sec 2. l 2E-03 = CFM per ml/sec Fm = The maximum flow rate for pathway m, CFM NOTE: According to NUREG-0133, the radioactive effluent radiation monitor alarm/trip setpoints should be based on the radioactive noble gases. It is not practicable to apply
  • instantaneous alarm/trip setpoints to integrating monitors sensitive to radioiodines,
  • radioactive materials in particulate form, and radionuclides other than noble gases. 6.3.3 Noble Gas Effluent Air Dose Limit a. Requirement I. The air dose in unrestricted areas due to noble gases released in gaseous effluents from each unit at or beyond the site boundary shall be limited .to:
  • During any calendar quarter: 5 5 mrads for gamma radiation and *5 10 mrads for beta radiation
  • During any calendar year: 510 mrads for gamma radiation and 520 mrads for beta radiation
2. Cumulative dose contributions for noble gases for the current calendar quarter and current calendar year shall be determined in accordance with 6.3.3.c. at least once per 31 days. *
  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER b. Action VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 31 OF IS6 If the calculated air dose from radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents exceeds any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the NRC, within 30 days, a* special report in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports, that identifies the causes for exceeding the limits and defines corrective actions that have been taken to reduce releases and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the limits in 6.3.3.a. c. Noble Gas Effluent Air Dose Calculation Gaseous releases, not through the process vent, are considered ground level and shall be included in the determination of Oi.vv* The air dose to areas at or beyond the site boundary due to ~oble gases shall be determined by the following:

For gamma radiation: Dg = 3.17E-08L [MivvQivv + MipvQipv] i (18) VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 32 OF i56 For beta radiation: Where: Subscripts = Dg = Db = Mivv, Mipv = Nivv, Nipv = Qivv* Qipv = 3.l 7E-08 L [NivvQ~vv + NipvQipv1 i (19) vv, refers to vent releases from the building ventilation vents, including the Radwaste Facility Ventilation Vent and air ejectors pv, refers to the vent releases from the process vent i, refers to individual radionuclide the air dose for gamma radiation, in mrad the air dose for beta radiation, in mrad the air dose factors for ventilation vents or process vent release due to gamma emissions for each identified noble gas radionuclide i, in mrad/yr per Curie/sec. Factors are listed in Attachments 12 and 13 the air dose factor for ventilation vents *or process vent release due to beta emissions for each identified noble gas radionuclide i, in mrad/yr per Curie/sec. Factors are listed in Attachments 12 and' 13 the release for ventilation vents or process vent of noble gas radionuclide i, in gaseous effluents for 31 days, quarter, or year as appropriate in Curies (per site) * * *

  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 33 OF 156 6.3.4 1-131, 1-133, H-3, and Radionuclides In Particulate Form Effluent Dose Limit a. Requirement
1. Methods shall be implemented to ensure that the dose t0 any organ of a member of the public from I 131 , I 133 , tritium, and all rad~onuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days, in gaseous effluents released from the site to unrestricted areas from each reactor unit shall be:
  • During any calendar quarter: .:s; 7.5 mrem to the critical organ
  • During any calendar year:.=:;, 15 mrem to the critical organ 2. Cumulative dose contributions to a member of the public from I 131 , I 133 , tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days, in gaseous effluents released to unrestricted areas for the current calendar quarter and current calendar year shall be determined at least once per 31 days in accordance with 6.3.4.c. or 6.3.4.d. b. Action If the calculated dose from the release of I 131 , I 133 , tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form, with half-lives greater than 8 days, in gaseous effluents exceeds any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the NRC within 30 days, a special report in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports, that contains the: 1. Causes for exceeding limits. 2. Corrective actions taken to reduce releases.
3. Proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with limits stated in 6.3.4.a. c. Surry Dose Calculations Gaseous releases, not through the process vent, are considered ground level and shall be included in the determination of Q;vv. Historical data pertaining to the volumes and radioactive concentrations of gaseous effluents released in connection to specific Station functions.

such as containment purges, shall be used in the estimates, as appropriate . .VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 34 OF 156 1. The dose to the maximum exposed member of the public, attributable to

  • gaseoui effluents at and beyond the site*boundary that contain I 131 , I 133 , tritium, and particulate-form radionuclides with half-lives greater than 8 days, shall be determined by: Where: Subscripts

= vv, refers to vent releases from the building ventilation vents, including the Radwaste Facility Ventilation Vent and air ejectors; pv, refers to the vent releases from the process vent Dr = the dose to the critical organ of the maximum exposed member of the public in mrem RMivv, RMipv= the cow-milk pathway dose factor for ventilation vents or process vent release due to I 131 , I 133 , tritium, and from all I Riivv, Rlipv = QivvQipv = particulate-form radionuclides with half-lives greater than 8 days, in mrem/yr per Curie/sec. Factors are listed in

  • Attachment 18, Critical Organ and Inhalation Dose Factors For Surry the inhalation pathway dose factor for ventilation vents or process vent release due to I 131 , I 133 , tritium, and from all particulate-form radionuclides with half-lives greater than 8 days, in mrem/yr per Curie/sec.

Factors are listed in Attachment 18 the release for ventilation vents or process vent of I 131 , I 133 , tritium, and from all particulate-form radionuclides with lives greater than 8 days in Curies 3.17 E-08 = the inverse of the number of seconds in a year *

  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 35 OF 156 6.3.4 1-131, 1-133, H-3, and -Radionuclides In Particulate Form Effluent Dose Limit (continued)
d. North Anna Dose Calculations Gaseous releases, not through the process vent, are considered ground level and shall be included in the detennination of '2ivv* Historical data pertaining to the volumes and radioactive concentrations of gaseous effluents released in connection to specific Station functions, such as containment purges, shall be used ~n the estimates as appropriate.
1. The dose to the maximum exposed member of the public, attributable to gaseous effluents at and beyond the site boundary, that contain 1 131 , 1 13 3, tritium, and particulate-form radionuclides with half-lives greater than 8 days, shall be detennined by: Where: )r = 3.17E-08 L [RMivvQivv

+ RMipvQipv. i (21) Subscripts = vv, refers to vent releases from the building ventilation vents; pv, refers to the vent releases from the process vent Dr = the dose to the critical organ of the maximum exposed member of the public, in mrem RMivv, RMipv =the cow-milk dose factor for ventilation vents or process vent release due to I 13 l, I 133 , tritium, and from all particulate-form radionuclides with half-lives greater than 8 days, in mrem/yr per Curie/sec. Factors are listed in Attachment 19, Critical Organ Dose Factors for North Anna QivvQipv = the release for ventilation vents or process vent of I 131 , I 133 , tritium, and from all particulate-form radionuclides with lives greater than 8 days, in Curies 3.17 E-08 = the inverse of the number of seconds in a year VIRGINIA

  • POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 36 OF 156 6.3.5 Gaseous Radwaste Treatment Historical data pertaining to the volumes and radioactive concentrations of gaseous effluents released in connection with specific Station functions, such as containment purges, shall be used to calculate projected doses, as appropriate.
a. Requirement
1. The Gaseous Radwaste Treatment System and the Ventilation Exhaust* Treatment System shall be used to reduce radioactive material in gaseous waste before its discharge, when projected gaseous effluent air doses due to gaseous effluent releases, from each unit to areas at and beyond the site boundary, would exceed 0.2 mrad for gamma radiation and 0.4 mrad for beta radiation, averaged over 31 days. (North Anna) 2*. Appropriate portions of the Gaseous Radwaste Treatment System shall be used to reduce radioactive materials in gaseous waste before its discharge, when the projected gaseous effluent air doses due to gaseous effluent releases, from each unit to areas at and beyond the site boundary, would exceed 0.2 mrad for gamma radiation and 0.4 m:rad for beta radiation, averaged over 31 days. (Surry)
  • 3. The Ventilation Exhaust Treatment System shall be used to reduce radioactive
  • materials in gaseous waste before its discharge, when the projected doses due to gaseous effluent releases, from each unit to areas at and beyond the site boundary, would exceed 0.3 mrem to the critical organ, averaged over 31 days. 4. Doses due to gaseous releases from the site shall be projected at least once per 31 days, based on the calculations in 6.3.5.c., and 6.3.5.d. b. Action If gaseous waste that exceeds the limits in 6.3.5.a. is discharged without treatment, prepare and submit to the NRC within 30 days, a sp~cial report in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports, that includes:
1. An explanation why gaseous rad waste was being discharged without treatment, identification of any inoperable equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the inoperability.
2. Actions taken to restore the inoperable equipment to operable status. 3. Summary description of actions taken to prevent recurrence.
  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 -PAGE 37 OF 156 6.3.5 Gaseous Radwaste Treatment (continued)
c. Projecied Gamma Dose 1 Determine Dg, the J 1-day gamma air close for the previous 31-day period, per Eq~ation (18). 2. Estimate Rg, the ratio of the estimated volume of gaseous effluent in the current 31-day period to the volume released during the previous 31-day period. 3. Estimate Fg, the ratio of the estimated noble gas effluent activity in the current 31-day period to. the noble gas effluent activity during the previous 31-day period (µCi/ml).
4. Determine PDg, the projected 31-day gamma air dose. PD = D (R xF ) g g g g d. Projected Beta Dose 1. Determine Db, the 31-day beta air dose in the previous 31 days, per Equation ( 19) . 2. Estimate Rg and Fg as in 6.3.5.c.2.

and 6.3.5.c.3.

3. Determine PDb, the projected 31-day beta air dose. e. Projected Maximum Exposed Member of the Public Dose (22) (23) 1. Determine Dmax, the 31-day maximum exposed member of the public dose in the previous 31-day period, per Equation (20) or Equation (21 ), where Dr = Dmax-2. Estimate Fi, the ratio of the estimated activity from I 131 , I 133 , radioactive materials in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days, and tritium in the current 31-day period to the activity of I 131 , I 133 , radioactive materials in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days, and tritium in the previous 31-day period (µCi/ml) .

VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103. REVISION 6 PAGE 38 OF 156 3. Determine PDmax, the projected 31-day maximum exposed member of the

  • public dose. PD = D (R xF.) max max g 1 (24) 6.4 Radioactive Liquid and Gaseous Release Permits RP shall maintain procedures for Liquid and Gaseous Release Permits to ensure effluent dose limits are not exceeded when making releases.

6.4.1 Liquid

Waste Batch Release Permits Operations shall obtain RP authorization before initiating batch releases of radioactive liquids. Examples of batch releases include: a. Surry Batch Releases Release of contents from the following tanks/sumps other than transfers to the Surry Radwaste Facility shall have a Liquid Waste Batch Release Permit before the. discharge:

  • Boron Recovery Test Tank (BRTT)
  • Low Level Waste Drain Tank (LL WDT) *
  • High Level Waste Drain Tank (HL WDT)
  • Liquid Waste Test Tank (LWTT)
  • Contaminated Drain Tank (CDT)
  • Laundry Drain Surge Tank (LDST)
  • Turbine Bu_ilding Sumps when RP determines that source activity requires placing pumps in manual mode
  • Condensate Polishing Building Sumps when RP determines the presence of contamination from primary-to-secondary leakage * **
  • **
  • VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 39 OF 156 6.4.1 Liquid Waste Batch Release Permits (continued)
b. North Anna Batch Releases NOTE: If the clarifier is in service, releases from tanks processed through the .clarifier are considered continuous releases.

A Batch Release Pennit is required for a .release from any tanks/sumps which contain (or potentially contain) radioactive liquid. Tanks/sumps include:

  • BRIT
  • LLWDT
  • HLWDT
  • Turbine Building Sumps when secondary coolant activity exceeds 1.0 E-5 µCi/ml
  • CDT 6.4.2 Continuous Release Permit Operations shall obtain RP authorization before initiating continuous releases of radioactive liquids . a. Surry Continuous Releases A Continuous release pennit is required at Surry for:
  • Steam generator blowdown
  • Component Cooling Water (CCW) heat exchanger to service water leakage, if applicable
  • Turbine Building sumps and/or subsurface drains if source activity concentrations are sufficiently low to allow continuous release b. North Anna Continuous Releases A Continuous Release Pennit is required at North Anna for:
  • Clarifier, unless being bypassed
  • Steam generator blowdown when darifier is bypassed
  • Containment mat sumps and service water reservoir when clarifier is bypassed 6.4.3 Waste Gas Decay Tank (~GDT) Release Permit Operations shall obtain RP authorization before initiating WGDT releases .

VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 40 OF 156 6.4.4 Reactor Containment Release Permits Operations shall obtain authorization from RP before initiating containment purges or . . containment hogging. Reactor Containment Release Permits shall be valid from start of purge/hog until:.

  • Routine termination
  • Terminated for cause by RP
  • Receipt of Radiation Monitoring System (RMS) Containment Gas Monitor high alarm 6.4.5 Miscellaneous Gaseous Release Permit Operations shall obtain RP author~zation before initiating releases of noble gases that may not be accounted for by routine sampling, or any planned release not being routed through the Process Vent or Ventilation Vents (e.g., steam driven auxiliary feedwater pump testing if primary to secondary leakage exists). 6.4.6 Radioactive Liquid and Gaseous Release Controls a. Operations shall notify RP of pending releases and request RP to initiate the appropriate release permit. Operations shall provide the necessary information to complete the required release permit. b. A representative sample shall be obtained of the source to be released.
1. Operations shall provide RP with liquid samples and sample information (e.g., time of sample) for samples obtained outside the Primary Sample Room, except Clarifier Proportional Tank and Clarifier Grab Samples at North Anna. 2. Chemistry shall provide RP with iiquid samples and sample information for samples obtained from inside the Primary Sample Room. 3. RP shall obtain gaseous samples. c. RP shall perform required sample analyses.
d. RP shall calculate and record the following information on a release permit:
  • Maximum authorized release rate
  • Maximum authorized release rate in percentage of limits specified by the ODCM
  • Applicable conditions or controls pertaining to the release * * *
  • * ** VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 41 OF 156 6.4.6 Radioactive Liquid and Gaseous Release Controls (continued)
e. RP shall notify the Shift Supervisor if it is determined that a release may not be within the effluent dose limits. f. Upon receipt of a release permit from RP, Operations shall: L Verify the correct source is authorized for release. 2. Note maximum authorized release rate.
  • 3. Note percent of Technical Specification limits the release represents.
4. Note and ensure compliance with any indicated controls or conditions applicable to the release. g. When commencing release, Operations shall provide RP with required information.

As approp~ate, required information shall include:

  • Date and time release was started
  • Starting tank/sump level
  • Beginning pressure
  • Release flo\V"rare-**--

-.. *

  • Dilution water flow rate h. Upon terminating the release, Operations shall return the permit to RP and provide . . information necessary for completion of permit As appropriate, required information shall include:
  • Date and time release was stopped
  • Tank/sump ending level
  • Release flow rate just prior to termination
  • Ending pressure
  • Volume released 6.5 Total Dose Limit to Public From Uranium Fuel Cycle Sources 6.5.1 Requirement The annual (calendar year) dose or dose commitment to a real individual due to releases of radioactivity and radiation from uranium fuel cycle sources shall not exceed 25 mrem to the total body or the critical organ (except the thyroid, which shall not exceed 75 mrem) .

VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 42 OF 156 6.5.2 Action a. If the calculated doses from release of radioactive materials in liquid or gaseous effluents exceed twice the limits in 6.2.3.a., 6.3.3.a., or 6.3.4.a., calculate (including direct radiation contribution from the units and from outside* storage tanks) whether limits in 6.5.1 have been exceeded.

b. If the limits in 6.5.1 have been exceeded, prepare and submit to the NRC within 30 days, a special report in accordance with VP AP-2802, Notifications and Reports, ~at defines the corrective action to be taken to reduce subsequent releases and to prevent recurrence, and includes a schedule for achieving conformance wi m the limits. Special reports, as defined in 10 CFR 20.2203(a)(4), shall include: 1. An analysis that estimates the radiation exposure (dose) to a real individual from uranium fuel cycle sources, including all effluent pathways and direct radiation, for the calendar year that includes the releases covered by the report. 2. A description of the levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive material involved, and the cause of the exposure levels or concentrations.
3. If the estimated dose exceeds the limits in 6.5.1, and if the release condition that violates 40 CFR 190 has not already been corrected, the special report shall include a request for a variance in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR 190. Submittal of the report is considered a timely request, and a variance is granted until staff action on the request is complete.
  • * *
  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 43 OF 156 6.6 Radiological Environmental Monitoring

6.6.1 Monitoring

Program a. Requirement

1. The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program shall be conducted as specified in Attachments 20 or 21, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program. 2. Samples shall be collected from specific locations specified in Attachment 22 or 23, Environmental Sample Locations.

[Commitment 3.2.2] 3. Samples shall be analyzed in accordance with:

  • Attachment 20 or 21 requirem~nts
  • Detection capabilities required by Attachment 24 or 25, Detection Capabilities for Environmental Sample Analysis
  • Guidance of the Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position on Environmental Monitoring dated November, 1979, Revision No. 1 b. Action 1. If the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program is not being conducted as required in 6.6.1.a., report the situation in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports, by preparing and submitting to ~he NRC, in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report required by Technical Specification (Surry Technical Specification 6.6.B.2 and North Anna Technical Specification 6.9.1.8), a description of the reasons for not conducting the program as required, and the plan for precluding recurrence.
2. If, when averaged over any calendar quarter, radioactivity exceeds the reporting levels of Attachment 26 or 27, Reporting Levels for Radioactivity Concentrations in Environmental Samples, prepare and submit to the NRC within 30 days, a special report in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports, that:
  • Identifies the causes for exceeding the limits, and
  • Defines the corrective actions to be taken to reduce radioactive effluents so that the potential annual dose to a member of the public is less than the calendar year limits of 6.2.3, 6.3.3, and 6.3.4 VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 44 OF 1°56 When more than one of the radionuclides listed in Attachment 26 or 27 are detected in the sampling medium, the report shall be submitted if: concentration ( 1) concentration (2) > 1 0 . reporting level (1) + reporting level (2) + *** -* (25) 3. When radionuclides other than those listed in Attachments 26 and 27 are detected and are the result of plant effluents, the report shall be submitted if the potential annual dose to a member of the public is equal to or greater than the calendar year limits of 6.2.3, 6.3.3, and 6.3.4. The report is not required if the measured level of radioactivity was not the result of plant effluents; however, in such an event, report and describe the condition in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Report~. 4. If milk or fresh leafy vegetable samples are unavailable from one or more of the sample locations required by Attachment 20 or 21, identify locations for obtaining replacement samples and add them to the radiological environmental monitoring program within 30 days.1'.he specific locations from which samples were unavailable may then be deleted from the monitoring program. Identify the cause of the unavailability of samples and identify the new locations for obtaining replacement samples in .the next Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports. Include in the report a revised figure and table for the ODCM to reflect the new locations . * * *
  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 45 OF 156 6.6.2 Land Use Census a. Requirement A land use census shall be conducted and *shall identify within a distance of 8 km (5 miles) the location in each of the 16 meteorologi_cal sectors of the following:
  • Nearest milk animal
  • Nearest residence
  • Nearest garden greater than 50 m2 (500 ft2) that produces broad leaf vegetation
1. The land use census shall be conducted during the growing season, at least once per 12 months, using methods that will provide the best results (e.g., door survey, aerial survey, local agriculture authorities).

Land use census results shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports. 2. In lieu of the garden census, road leaf vegetation sampling of at least three different kinds of vegetation may be performed at the site boundary in each of two different direction sectors with the highest predicted ground deposition (D/ Qs). Specifications for broad leaf vegetation sampling in Attachment 20 or 21 shall be followed, including analysis of control samples. b. Action 1. If a land use census identifies locations that yield a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated in 6.3.4.a.2, identify the new locations in the next Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports. 2. If a land use census identifies locations that yield a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway) 20 percent (Surry) or 25 percent (North Anna) greater than at a location from which samples are currently being obtained, add the new locations to the Radiological Environmental Moni~oring Program within 30 days. Sampling locations, excluding the control station location, that have the lowest calculated dose or dose commitments (via the same exposure pathway) may be deleted from the monitoring program. Identify new locations in the next Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report and include in the report revised figures and tables reflecting the new locations in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports. [Commitment 3.2.4] VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 46 OF 156 6.6.3 Interlaboratory Comparison Program . *

  • a. Requirement Radioactive materials (which contain nuclides produced at the Stations), supplied as part of an Interlaboratory Comparison Program that has been approved by the NRC, shall be analyzed.
b. Action I. Analyses shall be performed as part of the Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Intercomparison Studies (Cross Check) Program and include: Program Mille Water Air Filter Cross-Check
  • of I 131 , Gamma, K, Sr 89 and Sr 90 Gross Beta, Gamma, I 131 , H 3 (Tritium), Sr 89 and Sr 90 (blind-any combinations of above radionuclides)

Gross Beta, Gamma, Sr 90 2. If analyses are not performed as required by 6.6.3.b., report in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports, the corrective actions taken to prevent recurrence . * * *

  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6
  • PAGE 47 OF 156 6.6.3 lnterlaboratory Comparison Program (continued)
c. Methodology and Results 1. Methodology and results of the cross-check program shall be maintained in the contractor-supplied Nuclear Reactor Environmental Radiation Monitoring Quali.ty Control Manual, IWL-0032-361.
2. Results shall be reported in the Annual ~adiological Environmental Monitoring Report in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports. 6.7 Reporting Requirements

6.7.1 Annual

Radiological Environmental Operating Report Routine Radiological Environmental Operating Reports covering the operation of the units during the previous calendar year shall be submitted prior to May 1 of each year. A single submittal may be made for the Station. Radiological Environmental. Operating Reports shall include: a. Summaries, interpretations, and analysis of trends of results of radiological environmental surveillance activities for the report period, including:

  • A comparison (as appropriate) with preoperational studies, operational controls, and previous environmental surveillance reports
  • An assessment of the observed impacts of the plant operation on the environment
  • Results of land use census per 6.6.2 b. Results of analysis of radiological environmental samples and of environmental radiation measurements taken per 6.6.1, Monitoring Program. Results shall be summarized and tabulated in the format of the table in the Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position on Environmental Monitoring.
1. If some individual results are not available for inclusion with the report, the report shall be submitted, noting and explaining reasons for missing results. 2. Missing data shall be submitted in a supplementary report as soon as possible.
c. A summary description of the radiological environmental monitoring program. d. At least two legible maps covering sampling locations, keyed to a table giving distances and directions from the centerline of one reactor. One map shall cover stations near the site boundary; a second shall include more distant stations .

VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 48 OF 156 e. Results of Station participation in the Interlaboratory Comparison Program, per 6.6.3. f. Discussion of deviations from the Station's environmental sampling schedule per Attachment 20 or 21. g. Discussion of analyses in which the lower limit of detection (LLD) required by Attachment 24 or*25 was not achievable.

6. 7 .2 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report a. Requirement Radioactive Effluent Release Reports covering operation of the units during the previous 12 months of operation shall be submitted before May 1 of each year. A single submittal may be made for the Station and should combine those sections that are common to both units. Radioactive Effluent Release Reports shall include: 1. A summary of quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents and solid waste released.

Data shall be summarized on a quarterly basis following the format of Regulatory* Guide 1.21, Appendix B.

  • 2. An assessment of radiation doses to the maximum exposed members of the
  • public due to the radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents released from the Station during the previous calendar year. This assessment shall be in accordance with 6.7.2.b. 3. A list and description of unplanned releases from the site to unrestricted areas, during the reporting period, which meet the following criteria:
  • Unplanned releases that exceeded the1imits in 6.2.1 and 6.3.1
  • Unplanned releases which require a Deviation Report and involve the discharge of contents of the wrong Waste Gas Decay Tank or the wrong liquid radwaste release tank
  • Unplanned releases from large leaks due to unexpected valve or pipe failures that result in a quantity of release such that a 10 CFR 50. 72, Immediate Notification Requirements for Operating Nuclear Power Reactors or 10 CFR 50.73, Licensee Event Report System, report is required
  • Unplanned releases as determined by Radiation Protection Supervision, which may or may not require a Deviation Report *
  • *
  • VIRGJNIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 .PAGE 49 OF 156 6.7.2 -Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report (continued)
4. Major changes to radioactive liquid, gaseous, and solid waste treatm~nt systems during the reporting period. 5. Changes-to VPAP-2103, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (see 6.7.4). 6. A listing of new locations for dose calculations or environmental monitoring identified by the land use census (see 6.6.2). b. Dose Assessment
1. Radiation dose to individuals due to radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents from the Station during the previous calendar year shall either be calculated in accordance with this procedure or in accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.109. Population doses shall not be included in dose assessments.
2. The dose to the maximum exposed member of the public due to radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents from the Station shall be incorporated with the dose assessment performed above. If the dose to the maximum exposed member of the public exceeds twice the limits of 6.2.3.a. l, 6.2.3.a.2, 6.3.3.a.1, or 6.3.4.a.1, the dose assessment shall include the contribution from direct radiation . NOTE: NUREG-0543 states: "There is reasonable assurance that sites with up to four operating reactors that have releases within Appendix I design objective values are also in conformance with the EPA Uraniµm Fuel Cycle Standard, 40 CFR Part 190." 3. Meteorological conditions during the previous calendar year or historical annual average atmospheric dispersion conditions shall be used to determine*

gaseous pathway doses. 6. 7.3 Annual Meteorological Data a. Meteorological data collected during the previous year shall be in the form of joint frequency distributions of ~ind speed, wind direction, and atmospheric stability.

b. Meteorological data shall be retained in a file on site and shall be made available to NRC upon request.

VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103. REVISION 6 PAGE 50 OF 156 6.7.4 Changes to the ODCM Changes to the ODCM shall be: a. Reviewed and approved by SNSOC and the Station Manager before implementation.

b. Documented.

Records of reviews shall be retained as Station records. Documentation shall include: 1. Sufficient information to support changes, together with appropriate analyses or evaluations justifying changes. 2. A determination that a change will not adversely impact the accuracy or *reliability of effluent doses or setpoint calculations, and will maintain the level of radioactive effluent control required by:

  • 10 CFR 20 Subpart D
  • 40 CFR 190
  • 10 CFR 50.36a
  • 10 CFR 50, Appendix I c. Submitted to NRC in the form of a complete, legible copy of the entire ODCM as
  • a pan of, or concurrent with the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for the period of the report in which any change was made. Each change shall be identified by markings in the margin of the affected pages, clearly indicating the area of the page that was changed, and shall indicate the date (e.g., month/year) the change was implemented.
d. Submitted to the Management Safety Review Committee (MSRC) Coordinat?r.

[Commitment 3.2.1] e. Submitted to NRC in accordance with VPAP-2802, Notifications and Reports . * * *

  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 51 OF 156 7.0 RECORDS 7 .1 The following individual and packaged documents and copies of any related correspondence completed as a result of the performance or implementation of this procedure are records. They shall be submitted to Records Management in accordance with VPAP-1701, Records Management.

Prior to transmittal to Records Management, the sender shall assure that:

  • Each record is packaged when applicable,
  • QA program requirements have been fulfilled for.Quality Assurance records,
  • Each record is legible, completely filled out, and adequately identifiable to the item or activity involved,
  • Each record is stamped, initialed, signed, or otherwise authenticated and dated, as requited by this procedure.

7 .1.1 Individual Records None 7 .1.2 Record Packages

  • Records of changes to the ODCM in accordance with 6. 7.4
  • Records of meteorological data in accordance with 6. 7.3
  • Records of sampling and analyses
  • Records of radioactive materials and other effluents released *to the environment
  • Records of preventive maintenance, surveillances, and calibrations 7 .2 The following documents completed as a result of the implementation of this procedure are not records and are not required to be transmitted to Records Management.

None i ' ' VIRGINIA POWER I Intentionally Blank I VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 52 OF 156 * * *

  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 1 (Page 1 of 1) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 53 OF 156 Surry Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Instrument Minimum Action Operable Channels 1. GROSS RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM AND AUTOMATIC lERMINATION OF RELEASE (a) Radwru;te Facility Liquid Effluent Line RM-RRM-131 1 1 2. GROSS BETA OR GAMMA RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM BUT NOT PROVIDING AUTOMATIC lERMINATION OF RELEASE (a) Circulating Water Discharge Line Unit 1: 1-SW-RM-120 2 2 Unit 2: 2-SW-RM-220 (b) Component Cooling Service Water Effluent Line l-SW-RM-107A . 4 2 l-SW-RM-107B 1-SW-RM* 107C 1-SW-RM-107D
3. FLOW RA lE MEASUREMENT DEVICES Radwaste Facility Liquid Effluent Line Instrument Loop RLW-153 1 3 ACTION 1: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases shall be suspended.

ACTION 2: If the num.ber of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases via.this pathway may continue provided that, at least once per 12 hours, grab samples are collected and analyzed for principal gamma emitters, as defined in Attachment 8, Surry Radioactive Liquid Waste Sampling and Analysis Program. ACTION 3: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases via this pathway shall be suspended . VIRGINIA POWER Intentionally Blank I VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 54 OF 156 * *

  • I _J
  • * ** VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 2 (Page 1 of 2) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 55 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Minimum -. Instrument Operable Action Channels 1. Liquid Radwaste Effluent (a) 1-RM-LW-111, Liquid Radwaste Effluent Monitor -1 1 (b) 1-LW-FI'-104, LiquidRadwaste Effluent Total Flow Measuring 1 2 Device (c) 1-LW-SOV-121, Clarifier Effluent Line Continuous Composite Sampler and Sampler Flow Monitor 1 1 (d) 1-LW-TK.-20, Liquid Waste Effluent Sample Vessel 1 1 (e) 1-L W-1130, Liquid Waste Effluent Proportional Sample Valve 1 1 (t) 1-RM-SW-108, Service Water Effluent Monitor 1 1 (g) 1-RM-SW-130, Unit 1 Circulating Water System Effluent Line 1 4 Monitor (h) 2-RM-SW-230, Unit 2 Circulating Water System.Effluent Line 1 4 Monitor 2. Tank Level Indicating Devices (Note 1) (a) Refueling Water Storage Tanks Unit 1 1-QS-LT-lOOA 1 3 1-QS-LT-lOOB 1-QS-LT-lOOC 1-QS-LT-lOOD Uriit 2 2-QS-LT-200A 1 3. 2-QS-LT-200B 2-QS-L T-200C 2-QS-L T-200D (b) Casing Cooling Storage Tanks Unit 1 1-RS-LT-103A 1 3 1-RS-LT~103B Unit2 2-RS-LT-203A 1 3 2-RS-LT-203B (c) PG Water Storage Tanks (Note 2) 1-BR-LT-116A (1-PG-TK-IA) 1 3 l-BR-LT-116B (1-PG-TK-IB) 1 3 (d) Boron Recovery Test Tanks (Note 2) l-BR-LT-l 12A (1-BR-TK.-2A) 1 3 l-BR-LT-112B (1-BR-TK.-2B) 1 3 VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT2 (Page 2 of 2) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 56 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation ACTION 1: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases via this pathway may continue if, at least once within 12 hours, grab samples are collected and analyzed for gross radioactivity (beta and gamma) at ~n LLD of at least lxl0-7 µCi/g or an isotopic radioactivity at an LLD of at least SxlQ-7 µCi/g. ACTION 2: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases via this pathway may continue if the flow rate is estimated at least once per 4 hours during actual releases.

Design capacity performance curves generated in situ may be used to estimate flow. ACTION 3: If the number-of operable channels is less than required, liquid additions to this tank may continue if the tank liquid level is estimated during all liquid additions to the tank. ACTION 4: If the number of operable channels is less than required, make repairs as soon as possible. Grab samples cannot be obtained. via this pathway. NOTE I: Tanks included in this requirement are those outdoor tanks that are not surrounded by liners, dikes, or walls capable of holding the tank contents, and do not have overflows and surrounding area drains connected to the liquid radwaste treatment system. NOTE 2: This is a shared system between Unit 1 and Unit 2. * * *

  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 3 (Page 1 of 1) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 57 OF 156 Surry Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Surveillance Requirements Channel Description Channel Source Channel
  • Channel Check Check Calibration Functional , .Test. 1. GROSS RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM AND AUTOMATIC 1ERMINATION OF RELEASE (a) Radwaste Facility Liquid Effluent Line RM-RRM-131 D p R Q 2. GROSS BETA OR GAMMA RADIOACTIV-ITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM BUT NOT PROVIDING AUTO MA TIC 1ERMI-NATION OF RELEASE (a) Circulating Water Discharge Line Unit 1: 1-SW-RM-120 D M R Q Unit 2: 2-SW-RM-220 (b) Component Cooling Service Water Efflu entLine 1-SW-RM-107A D M R Q 1-SW-RM-107B 1-SW-RM-107C 1-SW-RM-107D
3. FLOW RA1E MEASUREMENT DEVICES Radwaste Facility Liquid Effluent Line Instrument Loop RLW-153 DR N/A R N/A VIRGINIA POWER Intentionally Blank VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 58 OF 156 * * **
  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT4 (Page 1 of 2) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 59 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Surveillance Requirements Channel Description Channel Source Channel Channel Check Check Calibration Functional Test 1. Liquid Radwaste Effluent (a) 1-RM-LW-111,Liquid Radwaste Effluent D D R Q (NOTE 1) Monitor (b) 1-LW-FT-104, Liquid Radwaste Effluent D (NOTE3) Total Flow Measuring Device NIA R Q {c) l-LW-SOV-121, Clarifier Effluent Line NIA NIA R NIA Continuous Composite Sampler and Sampler Flow Monitor {d) I-LW-TK-20, Liquid Waste Effluent D (NOTE9) NIA NIA NiA Sample Vessel {e) l-LW-1130, Liquid Waste Effluent D (NOTE9) NIA NIA NIA Proportional Sample Valve (0 l-RM-SW-108, Service Water System D M R Q (NOTE2) Effluent Monitor (g) l-RM-SW-130, Unit I Circulating Water D M R Q (NOTE2) System Effluent Line Monitor {h) 2-RM-SW-230.

Unit 2 Circulating Water D M R Q (NOTE2) System Effluent Line Monitor 2. 'I ank Level lnd1catmg Uev1ce (NOTE6) (a) Refueling Water Storage Tanks Unit I 1-QS-LT-lOOA D (NOTE4) NIA R Q (NOTE 7) 1-QS-LT-lOOB 1-QS-LT-lOOC 1-QS-LT-lOOD Unit 2 2-QS-LT-200A D (NOTE4) NIA R Q (NOTE 7) 2-QS-LT-200B 2-QS-LT-200C 2-QS-LT-200D {b) Casing Cooling Storage Tanks Unit I l-RS-LT-103A D (NOTE4) NIA R Q (NOTE 7) 1-RS-LT-103B Unit 2 2-RS-LT-203A D (NOTE4) NIA R Q (NOTE 7) 2-RS-LT-203B (c) PG Water Storage Tanks (NOTE 5) I-BR-LT-l 16A (1-PG-TK-lA) D (NOTE4) NIA R Q (NOTE 8) l-BR-LT-116B (1-PG-TK-IB) D (NOTE4) NIA R Q (NOTE 8) (d) Boron Recovery Test Tanks (NOTE 5) l-BR-LT-l 12A (1-BR-TK-2A) D (NOTE4) NIA R Q (NOTES) ... 1-BR-LT-112B (l-BR-TK-2B) D (NOTE4) NIA R Q (NOTE 8) VIRGINIA POWER ATIACHMENT4 (Page 2 of 2) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 60 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring lilstrumentation Surveillance Requirements NOTE 1: The Channel Functional Test shall demonstrate:

a. Automatic isolation of this pathway and Control Room alarm annunciation occur if the instrument indicates measured levels above alarm/trip setpoint.
b. Alarm annunciation occurs if the instrument controls are not set in "operate" mode. NOTE 2: The Channel Functional Test shall demonstrate that Control Room alarm annunciation occur if any of the following conditions exists: a. Instrument indicates measured levels above the alarm/trip setpoint.
b. Instrument controls not set in "operate" mode. NOTE 3: Channel Check shall consist of verifying indication of flow during periods of release. Channel Check shall be made at least once per 24 hours on days on which continuous, periodic, or batch releases are made. NOTE 4: Duri~g liquid additions to the tarik, verify indication of level change. NOTE 5: This is a shared system between Unit 1 and Unit 2. NOTE 6: Tanks included in this requirement are those outdoor tanks that are not'surrounded by liners, dikes, or walls capable of holding the tank contents and do not have overflows and surrounding area drains connected to the liquid radwaste treatment system. NOTE 7: The Channel Functional Test shall demonstrate that automatic isolation of this pathway and Control Room alarm annunciation occur if instrument indicates
  • measured levels outside the alarm/trip setpoint.

Demonstration of automatic isolation may consist of verifying the appropriate signal is generated. Valves need not be operated for this test. NOTE 8: The Channel Functional Test shall demonstrate that Control Room alarm annunciation occurs if the instrument indicates measured levels are outside alarm setpoint. NOTE 9: Channel Check shall consist of verifying that proportional flow exceeds 0.5 mls/gallon . * * *

  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 5 (Page 1 of 1) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 61 OF 156 Liquid Ingestion Pathway Dose Factors for Surry Station Units I and 2 Total Body Ai Thyroid Ai GI-LLI Radionuclide mrem/hr wrero(bc mrem(br µCi/ml µCi/ml µCi/ml . H-j 2.IS:lE-01 2.IS2E-Ul 2.82E-Ol Na-24 4.57E-Ol 4.57E-Ol 4.57E-Ol Cr-51 5.58E+OO 3.34E-Ol l.40E+03 Mn-54 l.35E+03 -2.16E+04 Fe-55 8.23E+03 -2.03E+04 Fe-59 7.27E+04 -6.32E+05 Co-58 1.35E+03 -l.22E+04 Co-60 3.82E+03 -3.25E+04 Zn-65 2.32E+05 -3.23E+05 Rb-86 2.9IE+02 -l.23E+02 Sr-89 l.43E+02 -8.00E+02 Sr-90 3.0IE+04 -3.55E+03 Y-91 2.37E+OO -4.89E+04 Zr-95 3.46E+OO -l.62E+04 Zr-97 8.13E-02 -* 5.51E+04 Nb-95 l.34E+02 -l.51E+06 Mo-99 2.43E+Ol -2.96E+02 Ru-103 4.60E+Ol -l.25E+04 Ru-106 2.0IE+02 -l.03E+05 Ag-llOm 8.60E+02 -5.97E+05 Sb-124 l.09E+02 6.70E-Ol 7.84E+03 Sb-125 4.20E+Ol l.79E-Ol 1.94E+03 Te-125m 2.91E+Ol 6.52E+Ol 8.66E+02 Te-127m 6.68E+Ol l.40E+02 l.84E+03 Te-129m l.47E+02 3.20E+02 4.69E+03 Te-13lm 5.71E+Ol l.08E+02 6.80E+03 Te-132 l.24E+02 1.46E+02 6.24E+03 1-131 l.79E+02 l.02E+05 8.23E+Ol 1-132 9.96E+OO 9.96E+02 5.35E+OO 1-133 3.95E+Ol l.90E+04 1.16E+02 1-134 5.40E+OO 2.62E+02 l.32E-02 1-135 2.24E+Ol 4.0IE+03 6.87E+Ol Cs-134 l.33E+04 -2.85E+02 Cs-136 2.04E+03 -3.21E+02 Cs-137 7.85E+03 -2.32E+02 Cs-138 5.94E+OO.

-5.12E-05 Ba-140 l.08E+02 -3.38E+03 La-140 2.IOE-01 -5.83E+04 Ce-141 2.63E-01 -8.86E+03 Ce-143 4.94E-02 -1.67E+04 Ce-144 9.59E+OO -6.04E+04 Np-239 l.91E-03 -7.11E+02 VIRGINIA POWER Intentionally Blank VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 62 OF 156 * * *

  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 6 (Page 1 of 5) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 63 OF 156 North Anna Liquid Ingestion Pathway Dose Factor Calculation Units I and 2 1.0 Equation ( 6) where: D = t F"' f.C.A. k,J 1 1 1 i* (6-1) D = cumulative dose commitment to the total body or critical organ. from the liquid effluents for the period t. in mrem t = period for which Ci and F are averaged for all liquid releases.

in hours F = the*near field average dilution factor for Ci during any liquid effluent release. Defined as the ratio of the average undiluted liquid waste flow durin.g"release to the average flow from the Station discharge structure to unrestricted areas fi = the individual dilution multiplication factor to account for increases in concentration of long-lived nuclides due to recirculation. listed on page 5 of this attachment. "fi" is the ratio of the total dilution flow over the effective dilution flow Ci = average concentration of radionuclide i, in undiluted liquid effluent during the period t. from any liquid releases, in µCi/ml Ai = the site-related ingestion dose commitment factor to the total body or critical organ of an adult for each identified principal gamma and beta errµtter listed on page 5 of this attachment. in mrem/hr per µCi/ml (6-2) where: 1.14 E+o5 = (1 E+06 pCi/µCi x 1 E+o3 ml/kg)/8760 hr/yr. units conversion factor 730 = adult water consumption, kg/yr, from NUREG-0133 VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 6 (Page 2 of 5) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 64 OF i 56 North Anna Liquid Ingestion Pathway Dose Factor Calculation Units 1 and 2 Dw = dilution: factor fro_m the near field area within one-quarter mile of the 21 = BFi = Da = DFi = release point to the potable water intake for the adult water consumption. Dw includes the dilution contributions from the Lake Anna Dam to Doswell (0.73), the WHTF (Cr/Cc), and Lake Anna (CR!'CL). The potable water mixing ratio is calculated as: where Cc, CL and CR are the respective concentrations for the considered nucli~e in the discharge channel, WHTF (Lagoon) and the Lake. Calculation is per expressions 11.2-5, 11.2-6, and 11.2-8 of the North AnnaUFSAR adult fish consumption rate, kg/yr, from NUREG 0133 the bioaccumulation factor for nuclide i, in fish, pCi/kg per pCi/1, from Table A-1 of Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1 dilution factor for the fish pathway, calculated as 1/(CL /Cc) where CL and Cc are the concentrations for the considered nuclide in the discharge channel and the WHTF (Lagoon). Calculation is per Expressions l 1._2-5, and 11.2-6 of North Anna's UFSAR the critical organ dose conver~ion factor for nuclide i, for adults, in mrem/ pCi, from Table E-11 of Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1

  • I * **
  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 65 OF 156 ATTACHMENT 6 (Page 3 of 5) North Anna Liquid Ingestion Pathway Dose Factor Calculation Units I and 2 2.0 Equation (9) Equation (6) is simplified for actual dose calculations by introducing:

WASTE FLOW . WASTE FLOW F = CIRC. (WATER) FLOW+ WASTE FLOW :::: .CIRC. FLOW and CIRC.FLOW

f. = ----------

1 EFFECTIVE DIL. FLOWi (6-4) (6-5) Effective dilution flow rates for individual nuclides "i" are listed on Attachment 7, North Anna Liquid Pathway Dose Commitment Factors for Adults. Then the total released activity (Qj) for the considered period and the ith nuclide is written as: Q. = txC.xWASTEFLOW 1 1 . (6-6) and Equation (6) reduces to: A. D = f' QiEFF. DIL.1 (6-7) For the long-lived, dose controlling nuclides, the effective dilution flow is essentially the over (dam) flow rate out of the Lake Anna system (i.e., the liquid pathway dose is practically independent from the circulating water flow rate. However, to accurately assess long range average effects of reduced circulating water flow rates during outages or periods of low lake water temperatures, calculations are based on an average of 7 out of 8 circulating water pumps running at 218,000 gpm = 485.6 cft/sec per pump . VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT6 (Page 4 of 5) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 66 OF 156 North Anna Liquid Ingestion Pathway Dose Factor Calculation Units 1 and 2 NOTE: The 218,000 gpm flow rate per Circulating Water pump is based on Reference 3.1.21. The choice of seven Circulating Water pumps is considered realistic. Compared to this, the NAPS UFSAR, Chapter 11.2 (Referen~e 3.1.18), contains an extremely conservative consideration based on the minimum flow in accordance with Reference 3.1.21 with only two Circulating Water pumps operating. Even at such a low flow rate, which cannot be sustained during power generation, liquid pathway effluent dose factors incre~se only slightly ~or the dose controlling nuclides (i.e., Cs 134 19 percent, Cs 137 15 percent). By defining Bi = Ai/ EFF. DIL. FLOWi, the dose calculation is reduced to a two factor formula: D = ~Q.xB. £..i 1 1 i Values for Bi (mrem/Ci) and EFF. DIL. FLOWi are listed in Attachment

7. (6-8) * * *
  • * ** VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 6 (Page 5 of 5)_ VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 67 OF 156 North Anna Liquid Ingestion Pathway Dose Factor Calculation Units 1 and 2 Individual Dilution Total Body Bi Liver Bi Radionuclide Multiplication Factor mrem/hr mrem/hr (fi) µCi/ml µCi/ml H-3 14.9 6.18E+OO 6.18E+OO Na-24 1.0 3.71E+Ol 3.71E+Ol Cr-51 1.7 1.lOE+OO -Mn-54 7.0 8.62E+02 4.52E+03 Fe-55 11.3 l.30E+02 5.56E+02 Fe-59 2.2 9.47E+02 2.47E+03 Co-58 2.8 2.49E+02 1.11E+02 Co-60 13.3 8.27E+02 3.75E+02 Zn-65 6.1 3.28E+04 7.25E+04 Rb-86 1.5 3.53E+04 7.59E+04 Sr-89 2.3 8.70E+02 -Sr-90 15.8 2.39E+05 -Y-91 2.5 3.42E-01 -Zr-95 2.7 2.98E-01 4.41E-01 Zr-97 1.0 150E-04 3.27E-04 Nb-95 1.9 1.13E+02 2.10E+02 Mo-99 1.0 7.48E+OO 3.93E+Ol Ru-103 2.0 4.lOE+OO -Ru-106 7.6 2.65E+Ol -Ag-llOm 6.2 4.94E+OO 8.32E+OO Sb-124 2.6 4.37E+Ol 2.08E+OO Sb-125 11.4 2.46E+Ol 1.16E+OO Te-125m 2.5 3.23E+02 8.73E+02 Te-127m 3.7 7.82E+02 2.29E+03 Te-129m 1.9 1.52E+03 3.58E+03 Te-131m 1.0 1.12E+02 1.35E+02 Te-132 1.0 5.04E+02 5.37E+02 1-131 1.2 9.66E+Ol 1.69E+02 1-132 1.0 1.03E-01 2.95E-01 1-133 1.0 3.47E+OO 1.14E+Ol I-134 1.0 2.15E-02 6.00E-02 I-135 1.0 6.58E-01 1.78E+OO Cs-134 10.3 5.80E+05 7.09E+05 Cs-136 1.3 6.01E+04 8.35E+04 Cs-137 15.8 3.45E+05 5.26E+05 Cs-138 1.0 9.18E-01 1.85E-f00 Ba-140 1.3 2.65E+Ol 5.08E-Ol La-140 1.0 4.47E-03 1.69E-02 Ce-141 1.8 2.14E-02 1.89E-01 Ce-143 1.0 1.35E-04 1*.22E+OO Ce-144 6.6 1.41E+OO 1.lOE+Ol Np-239 1.0 5.13E-04 9.31E-04 VIRGINIA POWER Intentionally Blank VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 68 OF 156 * * *
  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 7 (Page 1 of 1) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 69 OF 156 North Anna Liquid Pathway Dose Commitment Factors for .Adults Bi= Ai F/CIRC FLOW= (A/Effective Dilution Flowi) X 9.81E-3 hr ft3 µCi/ sec ml Ci Radionuclide Effective Dilution Flow Total Body Bi Liver Bi (cft/sec) (mrem/Ci) (mrem/Ci)

H-3 2.28E+02 2.66E-04 2.66E-04 Na-24 3.39E+03 l.07E-04 1.07E-04 Cr-51 1.99E+03 5.44E-06 NIA Mn-54 4.88E+02 1.73E-02 9.0SE-02 Fe-55 3.01E+02 4.23E-03 1.SlE-02 Fe-59 1.57E+03 5.93E-03 1.SSE-02 Co-58 1.20E+03 2.04E-03 9.lOE-04 Co-60 2.55E+02 3.lSE-02 1.44E-02 Zn-65 5.60E+02 5.74E-01 1.27E+OO Rb-86 2.34E+03 l.48E-01 3.lSE-01 Sr-89 1.46E+03 5.84E-03 NIA Sr-90 2.16E+02 l.09E+Ol NIA Y-91 1.34E+03 2.SOE-06 NIA Zr-95 1.27E+03 2.30E-06 3.40E-06 Zr-97 3.39E+03 4.33E-10 9.46E-10 Nb-95 1.78E+03 6.24E-04 1.16E-03 Mo-99 3.30E+03 2.22E-05 l.17E-04 Ru-103 1.68E+03 2.40E-05 NIA Ru-106 4.48E+02 5.SOE-04 NIA Ag-llOm 5.52E+02 8.78E-05 1.48E-04 Sb-124 1.32E+03 3.25E-04 1.SSE-05 Sb-125 2.98E+02 8.lOE-04 3.SOE-05 Te-125m 1.35E+03 2.35E-03 6.35E-03 Te-127m 9.16E+02 8.37E-03 2.46E-02 Te-129m 1.82E+03 8.19E-03 l.93E-02 Te-131m 3.38E+03 3.27E-04 3.92E-04 Te-132 3.27E+03 l.SlE-03 1.61E-03 1-131 2.94E+03 3.22E-04 5.62E-04 1-132 3.40E+03 2.98E-07 8.SlE-07 1-133 3.39E+03 l.OOE-05 3.29E-05 1-134 3.40E+03 6.19E-08 1.73E-07 1-135 3.40E+03 1.90E-06 5.lSE-06 Cs-134 3.29E+02 1.73E+Ol 2.llE+Ol Cs-136 2.62E+03 2.25E-01 3.12E-01 Cs-137 2.15E+02 l.57E+Ol 2.40E+Ol Cs-138 3.40E+03 2.65E-06 5.34E-06 Ba-140 2.65E+03 9.83E-05 l.SSE-06 La-140 3.36E+03 1.31E-08 4.94E-08 Ce-141 1.85E+03 l.14E-07 1.00E-06 Ce-143 3.37E+03 3.93E-10 3.SSE-06 Ce-144 5.14E+02 2.70E-05 2.lOE-04 Np-239 3.32E+03 l.SlE-09 2.75E-09 VIRGINIA POWER I Intentionally Blank VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 70 OF 156 * * **

  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER* ATTACHMENT 8 (Page 1 of 3) VPAP-2103 REV1SI0N6 PAGE 71 OF 156 Surry Radioactive Liquid Waste Sampling and Analysis Program Liquid Release Sampling Minimum Analy-Type of Activity Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) Type Frequency sis Frequency Analysis (µCi/ml), (Note 1) p p Principle Gamma 5 X 10-7 Emitters (Note 3) (Each Batch) (Each Batch) 1131 1 x 10-6 p Dissolved and Batch Releases M Entrained Gases 1 X 10-5 (One Batch/M) (Gamma Emitters) (Note 2) p M Composite H3 1 X 10-5 (Each Batch) (Note 4) Gross Alpha 1 X 10-7 p Q Composite Sr 89 and Sr 90 5 X 10-8 (Each Batch) (Note 4) Fess 1 x 10-6 Continuous W Composite Principal Gamma* 5 X 10-1 Emitters (Note 6) (Note 6) (Note 6) 1131 1 x 10-6 Continuous M Dissolved and M Entrained Gases } X 10-S Releases Grab Sample (Gamma Emitters) (Note 5) Continuous M Composite H3 1 x 10-5 (Note 6) (Note 6) Gross Alpha 1 x 10-1 Continuous Q Composite Sr 89 and Sr 90 5 X 10-8 (Note 6) (Note 6) Fess } X 10-6 VIRGINIA POWER ATIACHMENT8 (Page 2 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 72 OF 156 Surry Radioactive Liquid Waste Sampling and Analysis Program NOTE I: For a particular measurement system (which may include radiochemical separation):

LLD -E

  • V
  • 2.22E+06
  • Y
  • e-(11.At)

(8-1) Where: LLD = the "a priori" (before the fact) Lower Limit of Detection (as microcuries per unit mass or volume) (see 4.8) Sb = the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (as counts per minute, cpm) E = the counting efficiency (as counts per disintegration) V = the sample size (in units of mass or volume) 2.22E+o6 = the number of disintegrations per minute (dpm) per microcurie Y = the fractional radiochemical yield (when applicable) . A. * = the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide At = the elapsed time between the midpoint of sample collection and time of counting Typical values of E, V, Y and At should be used in the calculation. The LLD is an "a priori" (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not a "posteriori" (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement. NOTE 2: A batch release is the discharge of liquid wastes of a discrete volume. Before sampling for analyses, each batch shall be isolated, and appropriate methods will be used to obtain a representative sample for analysis.

  • * *
  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 8 (Page 3 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 73 OF 156 Surry Radioactive Liquid Waste Sampling and Analysis Program NOTE 3: The principal gamma emitters for which the LLD specification applies exclusively are the following radionuclides:

Mn 54; Fe 59 , Co 58 , Co 60 , Zn 65 , Mo 99 , Cs 134, Cs 137 , Ce 141 , and Ce 1 44. This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be detected and reported. Other peaks that are measurable and identifiable, at levels exceeding the LLD, together with the above nuclides, shall also be identified and reported. NOTE 4: A composite* sample is one in which the quantity of liquid sampled is proportional to the quantity of liquid waste discharged and for which the method of sampling employed results in a specimen that is representative of the liquids released. NOTE 5: A continuous release is the discharge of liquid wastes of a non-discrete volume, e.g., from a volume of a system that has an input flow during the continuous release. NOTE 6: To be representative of the quantities and concentrations of radioactive materials in liquid effluents, composite sampling shall employ appropriate methods which will result in a specimen representative of the effluent release . VIRGINIA POWER \ Intentionally Blank VPAP-2103 . REVISION 6 PAGE 74 OF 156 * * *

  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT9 (Page 1 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 75 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Liquid. Waste Sampling and Analysis Program Liquid Release Sampling Minimum Analy-Type of Activity Lower Limit of Type_ Frequency
  • sis Frequency Analysis Detection (LLD) (µCi/ml), (Note 1) p p Principle Gamma 5 X 10-7 Emitters (Note 3) (Each Batch) (Each Batch) 1131 1 X 10-6 Batch Releases p M Dissolved and (One Batch/M) Entrained Gases 1 X 10-5 (Gamma Emitters) (Notes 2 and 7) p M Composite H3 1 X 10-S (Each Batch) (Note 4) Gross Alpha 1 X 10-7 p Q Composite Sr 89 and Sr 90 5 X 10-S (Each Batch) (Note 4) Fe55 1 X 10-6 Principal Gamma 5 X 10-? Emitters (Note 6) Continuous W Composite I 131 1 X 10-6 Continuous (Note 6) (Note 6) u1ssolvea ana Releases Entrained Gases } X 10-5 (Gamma Emitters) (Note 5) Continuous M Composite H3 1 X 10-S (Note 6) (Note 6) Gross Alpha 1 X 10-7 Continuous QComposite Sr 89 and Sr 90 5 X 10-S (Note 6) (Note 6) Fe55 1 X 10-6 VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 76 OF 156 ATTACHMENT9 (Page 2 of 3)
  • North Anna Radioactive Liquid Waste Sampling*and Analysis Program NOTE 1: For a particular measurement syst~m (which may include radiochemical separation):

LLD -4.66 Sb E

  • V
  • 2.22E+06
  • Y
  • e-(11.At) Where: (9-1) LLD = the "a priori" (before the fact) Lower Limit of Detection as defined above (as microcuries per unit mass or volume) (see 4.8) Sb = the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting
  • rate of a blank sample as appropriate (as counts per minute, cpm) E = the counting efficiency (as.counts per disintegration)

V = the sample size (in units of mass or volume) 2.22E+06 = the number of disintegrations per minute (dpm) per microcurie Y = the fractional radiochemical yield (when applicable) A = the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide At = the elapsed time between the midpoint of sample collection and time of counting Typical values of E, V,Y and At should be used in the calculation. The LLD is an "a priori" (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not a "posteriori" (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement NOTE 2: A batch release is the discharge of liquid wastes of a discrete volume. Before sampling for analyses, each batch shall be isolated, and then thoroughly mixed as the situation permits, to assure representative sampling.

  • * *
  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 9 (Page 3 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 77 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Liquid Waste Sampling and Analysis Program NOTE 3: The principal gamma emitters for which the LLD specification applies exclusively are the following radionuclides:

Mn 54 , Fe 59 , Co 58 , Co 60 , Zn 65 , Mo 99 , Cs 13 4 , Cs 13 7 , Ce 141 , and Ce 1 44. This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be detected and reported. Other peaks that are measurable and identifiable, at levels exceeding the LLD, together with the above nuclides, shall also be identified and reported: NOTE 4: A composite sample is one in which the quantity of liquid sarripled is proportional to the quantity of liquid waste discharged and for which the method of sampling employed results in a specimen that is representative of the liquids released. NOTE 5: A continuous i:elease is the discharge of liquid wastes of a non-discrete volume, e.g., from a volume of a system that has an input flow during the continuous release. NOTE 6: To be representative of _the quantities and concentrations of radioactive materials in liquid effluents, samples shall be collected continuously in proportion to the rate of flow of the effluent stream. Prior to analyses, all samples taken for the composite shall be thoroughly mixed in order for the composite sample to be representative of the effluent releases. NOTE 7: Whenever the secondary coolant activity exceeds 10-s µCi/ml, the turbine building sump pumps shall be placed in manual operation and samples shall be taken and analyzed prior to release. Secondary coolant activity samples shall be collected and analyzed on a weekly basis. These samples are analyzed for gross activity or gamma isotopic activity within 24 hours . VIRGINIA POWER I Intentionally Blank r VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 78 OF 156 * * *

  • * ** VIRGJNIA POWER ATTACHMENT IO (Page 1 of 5) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 79 OF 156 Surry Radioactive Gaseous Waste Sampling and Analysis Program Gaseous Release Sampling Minimum Type of Activity Lower Limit of Type Frequency Analysis Analysis Detection (LLD) Frequency

(µCi/ml), (Note 1) A. Waste Gas Prior to Release Prior to Release Principal Gamma (Each Tanlc) 1 x 10-4 Storage Tank (Grab Sample) (Each Tank) Emitters (Note 2) Prior to Release Prior to Release Principle Gamma 1 x 10-4 B. Containment Emitters (Note 2) Purge (Each PURGE) (Each PURGE) H3 1 x 10-6 (Grab Sample) C. Ventilation Weekly Weekly Principle Gamma 1 X 10-4 (l)Process Vent (Grab Sample) Emitters (Note 2) (2)Vent Vent#l H3 (3)Vent Vent#2 (Note 3) (Note 3) 1 x 10-6 (4)SRF Vent Continuous Weekly (Note 5) 1131 1 X 10-12 (Note 4) (Charcoal.Sample) 1133 1 X 10-lO Continuous Weekly (Note 5) Principal Gamma 1 X 10-ll All Release (Note 4) Particulate Sample Emitter (Note 2) Continuous Weekly Types.as listed (Note 4) Composite Gross Alpha 1 X 10-ll Particulate Sample in A, B, and C Continuous Quarterly Composite Sr 89 and Sr 90 1 X 10-ll (Note 4) Particulate Continuous Noble Gas Noble Gases Gross 1 X 10-6 . (Note 4) Monitor Beta and Gamma Weekly Weekly Principle Gamma 1 X 10-4 Condenser Air Emitters (Note 2) Ejector Grab Sample (Note 3) H3 1 X 10-6 (Note 3) VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 10 (Page 2 of 5) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 80 OF 156 Surry Radioactive Gaseous Waste Sampling arid Analysis Program Gaseous Release *sampling Minimum Type of Activity Lower Limit of Type Frequency Analysis Analysis Detection (LLD) Frequency* (µCi/ml), (Note 1) Prior to Release Prior to Release Principle Gamma 1 X 10-4 Emitters (Grab Sample) (Each Release) H3 1 X 1.0*6 Continuous Charcoal Sample 1131 1 X 10-ll (Note 4) (Note 6) 1133 1 X 10*10 Containment Hog Depres-Continuous Particulate Principal Gamma 1 X 10-lO (Note 4) Sample (Note 6) Emitter (Note 2) surization . Composite Continuous Particulate Gross Alpha 1 X 10-lO (Note 4) Sample (Note 6)

  • Continuous Composite Sr 89 and Sr 90 1 X 10-lO (Note 4) Particulate Sample (Note 6) --------* *
  • _J
  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 10 (Page 3 of 5) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 81 OF 156 Surry Radioactive Gaseous Waste Sampling and Analysis J;>rogram NOTE 1: For a particular measurement system (which may include radiochemical separation):

LLD= E

  • V
  • 2.22E+06
  • Y
  • e-(A.At) (10-1) Where: LLD = the "a priori" (before the fact) Lower Limit of Detection as defi'ned above (as microcuries per unit mass or volume) (see 4.8). Sb = the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (as counts per minute, cpm). E = the counting efficiency (as counts per disintegration) . V = the sample size (in units of mass or volume). 2.22E+o6 = the number of disintegrations per minute (dpm) per rnicrocurie.

Y = the fractional radiochemical yield (when applicable). A. = the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide. At = the elapsed time between the midpoint of sample collection and time of counting. Typical values of E, V, Y and At should be used in the calculation. The LLD is an "a priori" (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not a "posteriori" (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement . VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 10 (Page 4 of 5) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 82 OF 156 Surry Radioactive Gaseous Waste Sampling arid Analysis Program NOTE 2: The principal gamma emitters for which the LLD specification applies exclusively are the following radionuclides: Kr 87 , Kr 88 , Xe 133 , Xe 133 m, Xe 135 , Xe 135 m, and Xe 138 for gaseous emissions and Mn 54 , Fe 59 , Co 58 , Co 60 , Zn 65 , Mo 99 , Cs 1 34 , Cs 137 , Ce 141 and Ce 144 for particulate emissions. This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be detected and reported. Other nuclides with half lives greater than 8 days, that are measurable and identifiable at levels exceeding the LLD, together with the above nuclides, shall also be identified and reported. NOTE 3: Sampling and analysis shall also be performed following shutdown, start-up, and whenever a thermal power change exceeding 15 percent of the rated thermal power occurs within any one-hour period, when: a. Analysis shows that the dose equivalent I 13 1 concentration in the primary coolant has increased more than a factor of 3; and

  • b. The noble gas a~tivity monitor shows that effluent activity has increased by more than
  • a factor of 3. NOTE 4: The ratio of the sample flow rate to the sampled stream flow rate shall be known for the period covered by each dose or dose rate calculation made in accordance with 6.3.1, 6.3.3, and 6.3.4. NOTE 5: Samples shall be changed at least once per seven days and analyses shall be completed within 48 hours after changing (or after removal from sampler).

Sampling shall also be performed at least once per 24 h~urs for at least seven days following each shutdown, start-. up, or thermal power change exceeding 15 percent of rated thermal power in one hour, and analyses shall be-completed within 48 hours of changing. When samples collected for 24 hours are analyzed, the corresponding LLDs may be increased by a factor of 10. This requirement applies if: a. Analysis shows that the dose equivalent 1 131 concentration in the primary cool.ant has . increased by a factor of 3; and b. Noble gas monitor shows that effluent activity has increased more than a fact9r of 3; *

  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 10 (Page 5 of 5) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE _83 OF 156 Surry Radioactive Gaseous Waste Sampling and Analysis Program NOTE 6: To be representative of the quantities and concentrations of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents, composite sampling shall employ appropriate methods that will result in a specimen representative of the effluent release .

VIRGINIA POWER I Intentionally Blank I VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 84 OF 156 * * *

  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 11 (Page 1 of 4) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 -PAGE 85 OF 156 North Anna Radioacth:*e Gaseous Waste Sampling and Analysis Program* Gaseous Release Sampling Minimum Type of Activity Lower Limit of Type Frequency Analysis Analysis Detection (LLD) Frequency

(µCi/ml), (Note I) A. Waste Gas Prior to Release Prior to Release Principal Gamma (Each Tanlc 1 X 10-4 Storage Tank . Grab Sample) (Each Tanlc) Emitters (Note 2) Prior to Release Prior to Release Principle Gamma 1 X 10-4 B. Containment Emitters (Note 2) Purge (Each PURGE (Each PURGE) H3 1 X 10-6 Grab Sample) C. Ventilation Monthly Monthly Principle Gamma 1 X 10-4 ( 1) Process Vent (Grab Sample) Emitters (Note 2) (2) Vent Vent A (Notes 3, 4, and (Note 3) H3 1 x 10-6 (3) Vent Vent B 5) Continuous Weekly 1131 1 X 10-12 (Note 4) (Charcoal Sample) 1133 1 X 10-lO Continuous Weekly Principal Gamma 1 X 10-ll All Releas~ (Note 4) Particulate Sample Emitter (Note 2) Continuous Monthly 1 X 10-ll Types .as listed (Note 4) Composite Gross Alpha Particulate Sample in A, B, and C Continuous Quarterly Composite Sr 89 and Sr 90 1 X 10-ll (Note 4) Particulate Continuous Noble Gas Noble Gases Gross 1 X 10-6 (Note 4) Monitor Beta or Gamma Condenser Air Weekly . Weekly Principle Gamma 1 X 10-4 Ejector/Steam Emitters (Note 7) Generator Grab Sampie H3 1 X 10-6 Blowdown Vent (Note 6) Containment. Prior to Release Prior to each Principle Gamma 1 X 10-4 Vacuum Steam Emitters (Note 2) Ejector (Hogger) (Grab Sample) Release H3 1 X 10-6 (Note 8) VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103. REVISION 6 PAGE 86 OF 156 ATTACHMENT 11 (Page 2 of 4) North Anna Radioactive Gaseous Waste Sampling and Analysis Program NOTE 1: For a particular measurement system (which may include radiochemical separation): LLD= E

  • V
  • 2.22E+06
  • Y
  • e-(A.At) (11-1) Where: LLD = the "a priori" (before the fact) Lower Limit of Detection as defined above (as microcuries per unit mass or volume) (see Subsection 4.9) Sb = the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (as counts per minute, cpm) E = the counting efficiency (as counts per disintegration)

V = the sample size (in units of mass or volume) 2.22E+o6 = the number of disintegrations per minute (dpm) per microcurie Y = the fractional radiochemical yield (when applicable) A. = the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide At = the elapsed time between the midpoint of sample collection and time of counting Typical values of E, V, Y and At should be used in the calculation. The LLD is an "a priori" (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as "posteriori" (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement.

  • * *
  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 11 (Page 3 of 4) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 87 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Gaseous Waste Sampling and Analysis Program NOTE 2: The priQcipal gamma emitters for which the LLD specification applies exclusively are the following radionuclides:

Kr 87 , Kr 88 , Xe 133 , Xe 133 m, Xe 135 , Xe 135 m, and Xe 13~ for gaseous emissions and Mn 54 , Fe 59 , Co 58 , Co 60 , Zn 65 , Mo 99 , Cs 134 ,_Cs 137 , Ce 141 and Ce 144 for . particulate emissions. This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be det~cted and reported. Other peaks that are measurable and identifiable, at levels exceeding the LLD, together with the above nuclides, shall also be identified and reported. . . NOTE 3: Sampling and analysis shall also be perfonned following shutdown, start-up, and whenever a thermal power change exceeding 15 percent of the rated thermal power occurs within any one-hour period; if:

  • a. Analysis shows that the dose equivalent I 131 concentration iri the primary coolant is greater than 1.0 µCi/gm; and b. The noble gas activity monitor shows that effluent activity has increased by more than a factor of 3. NOTE 4: The ratio of the sample flow rate to the sampled stream flow rate shall be known for the period covered by each dose or dose rate calculation made in accordance with 6.3.1, 6.3.3, and 6.3.4. NOTE 5: Samples shall be changed at least once per seven days and analyses shall be completed within 48 hours after changing (or after removal from sampler).

Sampling shall also be performed at least once per 24 hours for at least seven days following each shutdown, up or thermal power change exceeding 15 percent of rated thermal power in one hour and analyses shall be completed within 48 hours of changing. When samples collected for 2~ hours are analyzed, the corresponding LLDs may be increased by a factor of 10. This requirement applies if: a. Analysis shows that the dose equivalent I 131 concentration in the primary coolant is greater than 1.0 µCi/gm and; b. Noble gas monitor shows that effluent activity has increased more than a factor of 3 . VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 11 (Page 4 of 4) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 88 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Gaseous Waste Sampling and Analysis Program NOTE 6: Whenever the secondary coolant 3:ctivity exceeds 10-s µCi/ml, samples shall be obtained and analyzed weekly. Secondary coolant activity samples shall be collected and analyzed on a weekly basis. These samples are analyzed for gross activity or gamma isotopic activity within 24 hours. NOTE 7: The principal gamma emitters for which the LLD specification applies exclusively are the following radio~uclides: Kr 87 , Kr 88 , Xe 133 , Xe 133 m, Xe 135 , Xe l3Sm, and Xe 138 for gaseous emissions. This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be detected and reported. Other peaks that are measurable and identifiable, at levels exceeding the LLD together with the above nuclides, shall also be identified and reported. NOTE 8: If the secondary coolant activity level in any Steam Generator supplying steam to the Hogger exceeds 1.0E-5 µCi/ml, Steam Generator samples shall be obtained and analyzed prior to release. * * *

  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER Noble Gas Radionuclide Kr-83m Kr-85m Kr-85 Kr-87 -Kr-88 Kr-89 Kr-90 Xe-13lm Xe-133m Xe-133 Xe-135m Xe-135 Xe-137 Xe-138 . Ar-41 ATTACHMENT 12 (Page 1 of 3) Gaseous Effluent Dose Factors for Surry (Gamma and Beta Dose Factors) xJQ = 6.0E-05 sec/m 3 at 499 meters N Direction Dose Factors for Ventilation Vent Kivv Livv Mivv Total Body Skin Gamma Air mrem/yr mrem[yr mrad/yr Curie/sec Curie/sec Curie/sec 4.54E+OO -l.16E+03 7.02E+04 8.76E+04 7.38E+04 9.66E+02 8.04E+04 l.03E+03 3.55E+05 5.84E+05 3.70E+05 8.82E+05 1.42E+05 9.12E+05 9.96E+05 6.06E+05 1.04E+06 9.36E+05 4.37E+05 9.78E+05 5.49E+03 2.86E+04 9.36E+03 l.51E+04 5.96E+04 1.96E+04 1.76E+04 1.84E+04 2.12E+04 1.87E+05 4.27E+04 2.02E+05 1.09E+05 1.12E+05 l.15E+05 8.52E+04 7.32E+05 9.06E+04 5.30E+05 2.48E+05 5.53E+05 5.30E+05 1.6IE+05 5.58E+05 VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 89 OF 156 Nivv Beta Air mrad/yr Curie/sec*

l.73E+04 1.18E+05 1.17E+05 6.18E+05 1.76E+05 6.36E+05 4.70E+05 6.66E+04 8.88E+04 6.30E+04 4.43E+04 1.48E+05 7.62E+05 2.85E+05 1.97E+05 VIRGINIA ** POWER Noble Gas Radionuclide Kr-83m Kr-85m Kr-85 Kr-87 Kr-88 Kr-89 Kr-90 Xe-131m Xe-133m Xe-133 Xe-135m Xe-135 Xe-137 Xe-138 Ar-41 ATTACHMENT 12 (Page 2 of 3) Gaseous Effluent Dose Factors fot Surry (Gamma and Beta Dose Factors) xJQ = l .OE-06 sec/m 3 at 644 meters N Direction Dose Factors for Process Vent Kipv Lipv Mipv Total Body Skin Gamma Air mrem/yr mrem/yr mrad/yr Curie/sec Curie/sec Curie/sec 7.56E-02 -l.93E+Ol l.17E+03 l.46E+03 1.23E+03 1.61E+Ol 1.34E+03 1.72E+Ol

  • 5.92E+03 9.73E+03 6.17E+03 l.47E+04 2.37E+03 1.52E+04 1.66E+04 l.01E+04 l.73E+04 l.56E+04 7.29E+03 l.63E+04 9.I5E+Ol 4.76E+02 l.56E+02 2.51E+02 9.94E+02 3.27E+02 2.94E+02 3.06E+02 3.531$+02 3.12E+03 7.11E+02 3.36E+03 1.81E+03 l.86E+03 1.92E+03 l.42E+03 1.22E+04 1.5IE+03 8.83E+03 4.13E+03 9.2IE+03 8.84E+03 2.69E+03 9.30E+03 VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 90 OF 156 Nipv Beta Air mrad/yr Curie/sec 2.88E+02 1.97E+03 1.95E+03 1.03E+04 2.93E+03 1.06E+04 7.83E+03 l.11E+03 1.48E+03 l.05E+03 7.39E+02 2.46E+03 l.27E+04 4.75E+03 3.28E+03 * * *
  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 12 (Page 3 of 3) Gaseous Effluent Dose Factors for Surry (Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 91 OF 156 Ventilation Vent 'X)Q = 6.0E-05 sec/m 3 at 499 meters N Direction Process Vent 'X)Q = 1.0E-06 sec/m 3 at 644 meters S Direction Radionuclide Pivv Pipv mrem/yr mrem/yr Curie/sec Curie/sec H-3 6.75E+04 l.12E+03 Cr-51 5.13E+03 8.55E+Ol Mn-54 ND ND Fe-59 ND ND Co-58 ND ND Co-60 ND ND Zn-65 ND ND Rb-86 ND ND Sr-90 ND ND Y-91 ND ND Zr-95 ND ND Nb-95 ND ND Ru-103 ND ND Ru-106 ND ND Ag-II Om ND ND Te-127m 3.64E+05 6.07E+03 Te-129m 3.80E+05 6.33E+03 Cs-134 ND ND Cs-136 ND ND Cs-137 ND ND Ba-140 ND ND Ce-141 ND ND Ce-144 ND ND 131 9.75E+08 l.62E+07 1-133 2.31E+08 3.85E+06 ND -No data for dose factor according to Regulatory Guide 1.109, Revision 1 VIRGINIA POWER Intentionally Blank VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 92 OF 156 * * *
  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER Noble Gas Radionuclide Kr-83m Kr-85m Kr-85 Kr-87 Kr-88 Kr-89 Kr-90 Xe-.13lm Xe-133m Xe-133 Xe-135m Xe-135 Xe-137 Xe-138 Ar-41 ATTACHMENT 13 (Page 1 of 3)
  • Gaseous Effluent Dose Factors for North Anna (Gamma and Beta Dose Factors) 'X)Q = 9.3E-06 sec/m 3 at 1416 meters SE Direction Dose Factors for Ventilation Vent Kivv Livv Mivv Total Body Skin Gamma Air mrem/yr mrem/yr mrad/yr Curie/sec Curie/sec Curie/sec 7.03E-01 -l.79E+02 1.09E+04 l.36E+04 l.14E+04 l.50E+02 l.25E+04 l.60E+02 5.51E+04 9.05E+04 5.74E+04 1.37E+05 2.20E+04 1.41E+05 1.54E+05 9.39E+04 1.61E+05 1.45E+05 6.78E+04 l.52E+05 8.51E+02 4.43E+03 1.45E+03 2.33E+03 9.24E+03 3.04E+03 2.73E+o3 2.85E+03 3.28E+03 2.90E+04 6.61E+03 3.l2E+04 1.68E+04 1.73E+04 l.79E+04 1.32E+04 l.13E+05 1.40E+04 8.21E+04 3.84E+04 8.57E+04 8.22E+04 2.50E+04 8.65E+04 VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 93 OF 156 Nivv Beta Air mrad/yr Curie/sec 2.68E+o3 1.83E+04 l.81E+04 9.58E+04 2.72E+04 9.86E+04 7.28E+04 1.03E+04 1.38E+04 9.77E+03 6.87E+03 2.29E+04 1.18E+05 4.42E+04 *3.05E+04 VIRGINIA POWER Noble Gas Radionuclide Kr-83m Kr-85m Kr-85 Kr-87 Kr'..88 Kr-89 Kr-90 Xe-131m Xe-133m Xe-133 Xe-135m Xe-135 Xe-137 Xe-138 Ar-41 ATTACHMENT 13 (Page 2 of 3) Gaseous Effluent Dose Factors for North Anna (Gamma and Beta Dose Factors) xJQ = l.2E-06 sec/m 3 at 1513 meters S Direction Dose Factors for Process Vent Kipv ~pv Mipv Total Body Skin Gamma Air mrem/yr mrem/yr mrad/yr Curie/sec Curie/sec Curie/sec 9.07E-02 -2.32E+Ol l.40E+03 1.75E+03 1.48E+03 1.93E+Ol l.61E+03 2.06E+Ol 7.10E+03 l.17E+04 7.40E+03 l.76E+04 2.84E+03 l.82E+04 1.99E+04 l.21E+04 2.08E+04 l.87E+04 8.75E+03 1.96E+04 l.lOE+02 5.71E+02 1.87E+02 3.01E+02 l.19E+03 3.92E+02 3..53E+02 3.67E+02 4.24E+02 3.74E+03 8.53E+02 4.03E+03 2.17E+03 2.23E+03 2.30E+03 1.70E+03 1.46E+04 l.81E+03 1.06E+04 4.96E+03 l.11E+o4 1.06E+04 3.23E+03 1.I2E+04 VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 94 OF 156 Nipv Beta Air mrad{yr Curie/sec 3.46E+o2 2.36E+03 2.34E+03 1.24E+04 3.52E+03 l.27E+04 9.40E+03 l.33E+03 l.78E+o3*

l.26E+03 8.87E+02 2.95E+03 l.52E+04 5.70E+03 3.94E+03 * * *

  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 13 (Page 3 of 3) Gaseous Effluent Dose Factors for North Anna (Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 95 OF 156 Ventilation Vent xJQ = 9.3E-06 sec/m 3 at 1416 meters SE Direction Process Vent xJQ = l .2E-06 sec/m 3 at 151 meters S Direction Radionuclide Pivv Pipv mrem/yr mrem/yr Curie/sec Curie/sec H-3 l.05E+04 l.35E+03 Cr-51 7.95E+02 1.02E+02 Mn-54 ND ND Fe-59 ND ND Co-58 ND ND Co-60 ND ND Zn-65 ND ND Rb-86 ND ND Sr-90 ND ND Y-91 ND ND Zr-95 ND ND
  • Nb-95 ND ND Ru-103 ND ND Ru-106 ND ND Ag-llOm ND ND Te-127m 5.64E+04 7.28E+03 Te-129m 5.88E+04 7.59E+03 Cs-134 ND ND Cs-136 ND ND .. ,' , Cs-137 ND ND. Ba-140 ND ND Ce-141 ND ND Ce-144 ND ND 131 1.51E+08 1.95E+07 1-133 3.59E+07 4.62E+06 ND -No data for dose factor according to Regulatory Guide 1.109, Revision 1 VIRGINIA POWER I Intentionally Blank VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 96 OF 156 * * *
  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 14 (Page 1 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 97 OF 156 Surry Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation MINIMUM INSTRUMENT OPERABLE ACTION CHANNELS 1. PROCESS VENT SYSTEM '(a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor -Providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release 1-GW-RM-102 1 1 1-GW-RM-130-1 (b) Iodine Sampler Process Vent Continuous HP Sampler, or 1-GW-RM-130-1 1 2 (c) Particulate Sampler Process Vent Continuous HP Sampler, or 1 2 1-GW-RM-130-1 (d) Process Vent Flow Rate Monitor 1-GW-FT-100 1 3 (e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device KAMAN Flow Rate Measuring Device 1 3 (Parameter
  1. 19), or HP Sampler Rotometer
2. CONDENSER AIR EJECTOR SYSTEM (a) Gross Activity Monitor 1-SV-RM-111 2 ( one per unit) 1 . 2-SV-RM-211 (b) Air Ejector Flow Rate Measuring Device Unit 1: 1-VP-FI-IA 1-VP-FI-IB 2 ( one per unit) 3 Unit 2: 2-VP-FI-IA 2-VP-FI-IB
3. VENTILATION VENT SYSTEM (a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor SRF: RRM-101 1 1 SPS: Vent#l 1-VG-RM-104 1 1 Vent #2,.1-VG-RM

-110, or 1 1 1-VG-RM-131-1 VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 14 (Page 2 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 98 OF 156 Surry Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation MINIMUM INSTRUMENT OPERABLE ACTION CHANNELS (b) Iodine Sampler SRF: RRM-101 1 2 SPS: Vent #1, 1-VG-RM-104 1 2 Vent #2, Continuous HP Sampler, or 1 2 1-VG-RM-131-1 (c) Particulate Sampler SRF: RRM.:101 1 2 SPS: Vent#l, VG-RM-104 1 2 Vent #2, HP Continuous Sampler, or 1 2 1-VG-RM-131-1 (d) Ventilation Vent Flow Rate Monitor SRF: 01-RHV-Ff-156 1 3 SPS: Vent#l, 1-VS-FI'-119 1 3 Vent#2, 1-VS-Ff-116 1 3 (e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device SRF: RRM-101 1 3 SPS: Vent#l, 1-VG-RM-104 1 3 V ~nt #2, KAMAN Flow Rate Measuring Device 1 3 (Parameter

  1. 19), or HP Sampler Rotometer
  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER
  • VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 99 OF 156 * *** ATTACHMENT 14 . (Page 3 of 3) Surry Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation ACTION 1: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases via this path may continue provided grab samples are taken at least once per 12 hours and ~hese samples are analyzed for gross activity within 24 hours. ACTION 2: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases via the effected path may continue provided samples are continuously collected within one hour with auxiliary sampling equipment as required in Attachment
10. ACTION 3: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided the flow rate is estimated at least once per 4 hours .

VIRGINIA POWER Intentionally Blank VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 100 OF 156 * * *

  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 15 (Page 1 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 101 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation INSTRUMENT MINIMUM ACTION OPERABLE CHANNELS 1. PROCESS VENT SYSTEM (a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor 1-RM-GW-102 1 2,4 1-RM-GW-178-1 (b) Iodine Sampler 1-RM-GW-178-1 1 2,5 Process Vent Continuous HP Sampler (c) Particulate Sampler l-RM-GW-178-1 1 2,5 Process Vent Continuous HP Sampler (d) Total Flow Monitor 1-GW-Ff-108 1 1 (e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device KAMANS Flow Rate Measuring Device (Parameter
19) 1 1 HP Sampler Rotarneter

' 2. CONDENSER AIR EJECTOR SYSTEM (a) Gross Activity Monitor Unit 1 1-SV-RM-121 1 3 Unit 2 2-SV-RM-221 (b) Flow Rate Measuring Device Unit l 1-SV-FI-lOOA 1-SV-:FI-lOlA 1 (NOTE 1) 1 1-SV-FI-lOOB 1-SV-FI-lOlB Unit2 2-SV-Fl-200A 2-SV-FI-201A 2-SV-FI-200B 1 (NOTE 2) 1 2-SV-Fl-201B VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 15 (Page 2 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 102 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation MINIMUM INSTRUMENT OPERABLE. ACTION CHANNELS 3. VENTILATION VENT A (a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor 1-RM-VG-104 1 2 1-RM-VG-179-1 (b) Iodine Sampler 1-RM-VG-179-1 1 2 Vent Vent A Continuous~ Sampler (c) Particulate Sampler 1-RM-VG-179-1 1 2 Vent Vent A Continuous HP Sampler (d) Total Flow Monitor 1-HV-Ff-1212A 1 1 (e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device KAMANS Flow Rate Measuring Device (Parameter

19) 1 1 HP Sampler Rotameter
4. VENTILATION VENT B (a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor 1-RM-VG-113 1 *2 l-RM-VG-180-1 (b) Iodine Sampler 1-RM-VG-180-1 1 2 Vent Vent B Continuous HP Sampler (c) Particulate Sampler 1-RM-VG-180-1 1 2 Vent Vent B Continuous HP Sampler (d) Total Flow Monitor 1-HV-Ff-1212B L 1 (e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device KAMANS Flow Rate Measuring Device (Parameter
19) 1 1 HP Sampler Rotameter
  • * *
    • * ** VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 15 (Page 3 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 103 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation ACTION 1: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases, via this path, may continue if the flow rate is estimated at least once per four hours. ACTION 2: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases, via this path, may continue if grab samples are taken at least once per 12 hours and these samples are analyzed for gross activity or gamma isotopic activity within 24 hours. ACTION 3: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases, via this path, may continue if the frequency of the grab samples provided by Technical Specification requirement 4.4.6.3.b is increased to at least once per four hours and these samples are analyzed for gross activity or gamma isotopic activity within eight hours. ACTION 4: If the number of operable channels is less than required, the contents of the Waste Gas Decay Tanks may be released to the environment provided that prior to initiation of the release: a. At least two independent samples of the tank's contents are analyzed, and: b. At least two technically qualified members of the Station staff independently verify the release rate calculations and discharge valve lineup. ACTION 5: If the number of operable channels is less than required, effluent releases from the Waste Gas Decay Tank may continue provided samples are continuously collected with auxiliary sampling equipment as required in Attachment
11. NOTE 1: A channel shall consist of: a. The flow instrument installed in the ejector through which the discharge is routed; . eitherTr~nA (1-SV-FI-lOOA, 101A), or Train B (1-SV-FI-lOOB, 101B) or both. b. Flow instruments 101 A and 101 B provide low range measurement Flow instruments 1 OOA and 1 OOB provide high range measurement.

NOTE 2: A channel shall consist of: . a. The flow instrument installed in the ejector through which the discharge is routed; either Train A (2-SV-FI-200A, 201A), or Train B (2-SV-FI-200B, 201B) or both .

  • b. Flow instruments 201 A and 201 B provide low range *measurement Flow instruments 200A and 200B provide high range measurement.

VIRGINIA POWER Intentionally Blank VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 104 OF 156 ** * *

  • * ** VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 16 (Page 1 of 2) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 105 OF 156 Surry Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Surveillance Requirements CHANNEL CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL CHANNEL DESCRIPTION CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION FUNCTIONAL TEST l. .t'Kf_>r_ . ..,.,..,.

VEN! SY.:HEM (a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor -Providing Alam1 and Automatic Termination of Release l-GW-RM-102 D M,

  • R Q 1-GW-RM-130-1 (b) Iodine Sampler Process Vent Continuous HP Sampler, or 1-GW-RM-130-1 w NIA NIA NIA (c) Particulate Sampler Process Vent Continuous HP Sampler, or 1-GW-RM-130-1 w NIA NIA NIA (d) *Process Vent Flow Rate Monitor 1-GW-FT-100 D NIA R NIA (e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device HP Sampler Rotometer, or D NIA SA NIA KAMAN Flow Rate Measuring D NIA R NIA Device (Parameter
  1. 19) 2. CONDENSER AIR EJECTOR SYSTEN. (a} Gross Activity Monitor Unit 1: 1-SV-RM-111 D M R Q Unit 2:. 2-SV-RM-21 l (b) Air Ejector Flow Rate Measuring Device Unit 1: I-VP-FI-IA 1-VP-FI-IB D NIA R NIA Unit 2: 2~VP-FI-1A 2-VP-FI-IB
3. VENTILATION VENT SYSTEM (a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor SRF: RRM-101 SPS: 1-VG-RM-110 D M R Q I-VG-RM -131-1 VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 16 (Page 2 of2) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 106 OF 156 Surry Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Surveillance Requirements CHANNEL CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL DESCRIPTION CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION TEST (b) Iodine Sampler SRF: RRM-101 ,SPS: Vent#l, 1-VG-RM-104 Vent #2, Continuous HP w NIA NIA NIA Sampler, or 1-VG-RM-131-1 (c)
  • Particulate Sampler SRF: RRM-101 SPS: Vent#l, 1-VG-RM-104 Vent #2, Continuous HP w NIA NIA NIA Sampler, or 1-VG-RM-131-1 (d) Ventilation Vent Flow Rate Monitor SRF: 01-RHV-Ff-156 SPS: Vent#l, 1-VS-Ff-119 D NIA R NIA Vent#2, 1-VS-Ff-116 (e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device SRF: RRM-101 D NIA R NIA SPS: Vent#l, 1-VG-RM-104 D NIA R NIA
  • Vent #2, KAMAN Flow Rate D NIA R NIA Measuring Device (Parameter#

19), or HP D NIA NIA Sampler Rotometer SIA "' t'I'lOr to each waste uas J.Jeca 1 ank re1ease y * * *

  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 17 (Page 1 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 107 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Surveillance Requirements CHANNEL CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL CHANNEL DESCRIPTION CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION FUNCTIONAL TEST 1. PROCESS VENT SYSTEM (a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor l-RM-GW-102 D M(NOTE5) R Q (NOTE l) l-RM-GW-178-1 D M(NOTE5) R Q (NOTE l) (b) Iodine Sampler 1-RM-GW-178-1 w NIA NIA NIA Process Vent Continuous HP Sampler D (NOTE 3) NIA NIA NIA (c) Particulate Sampler 1-RM-GW-178-1 w NIA NIA NIA Process Vent Continuous HP Sampler D(NOTE3) NIA NIA NIA (d) Total Flow Monitor 1-GW-Ff-108 D NIA R Q (e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device KAMANS Flow Rate Measuring D (NOTE 3) NIA R NIA Device (Parameter
19) HP Sampler Rotameter D(NOTE3) NIA SA NIA 2. CONDENSER AIR EJECTOR SYSTEM (a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor Unit 1 l-SV-RM-121 D M R Q (NOTE 1) Unit 2 2-SV-RM-221 (b) Flow Rate Measuring Device Unit l 1-SV-FI-lOOA 1-SV-Fl-lOlA.

D NIA R NIA 1-SV-FI-lOOB 1-SV-FI-lOlB -Unit2 2-SV-FI-200A

  • 2-SV-FI-20 IA D NIA R NIA 2-SV-FI-200B 2-SV-FI-201B
  • VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 17 (Page 2 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 108 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation
  • Surveillance Requirements CHANNEL CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL CHANNEL DESCRIPTION CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION FUNCTIONAL TEST 3. VENTILATION VENT A (a) Noble Gas Activity Monitor 1-RM-VG-104 D M R Q (NOTE2) 1-RM-VG-179-1 D M(NOTE5) R Q(NOTE2) (b) Iodine Sampler 1-RM-VG-179-1 w NIA NIA NIA Vent Vent A Continuous HP Sampler D (NOTE 3) NIA NIA NIA (c) Particulate Sampler 1-RM-VG-179-1 w NIA NIA NIA Vent Vent A-Continuous HP Sampler D(NOTE3) NIA NIA NIA (d) Total :flow Monitor l-HV-Ff-1212A . D NIA R Q (e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device KAMANS Flow Rate Measuring D (NOTE 3) NIA R .NIA Device (Parameter
19) HP Sampler Rotameter D(NOTE3) NIA SA NIA 4. VENTILATION VENT B (a) Noble.Gas Activity Monitor 1-RM-V0-113 D M R Q (NOTE4) 1-RM-VG-180-1 D M(NOTE5) R Q (NOTE2) (b) Iodine Sampler l-RM-VG-180-1 w NIA NIA,. NIA Vent Vent B Continuous HP Sampler D (NOTE 3) NIA .. NIA NIA (c) Particulate Sampler 1-RM-VG-180-1 w NIA NIA NIA Vent Vent B Continuous HP Sampler D(NOTE3) NIA NIA NIA (d) Total Flow Monitor 1-HV-Ff-1212B D NIA R Q -(e) Sampler Flow Rate Measuring

-Device KAMANS Flow Rate Measuring D (NOTE 3) NIA R NIA . Device (Parameter

19) HP Sampler Rotameter D (NOTE 3) NIA SA NIA * * *
  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 17 (Page 3 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 109 OF 156 North Anna Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitor.ing InstrumentationSurveillance
  • Requirements NOTE 1: The Channel Functional Test shall demonstrate:
a. Automatic actuation of the valves in this pathway and Control Room alarm . annunciation occur if the instrument indicates measured levels above the alann/trip setpoint.
b. Alarm annunciation occurs if the instrument controls not set in "operate" mode. NOTE 2: The Channel Functional Test shall demonstrate:
a. Control Room alarm annunciation occurs if the instrument indicates measured levels are above the alann/trip setpoint.
b. Alarm annunciation occurs if the instrument controls not set in "operate" mode. NOTE 3: Channel Checks shall consist of verifying indication of flow during periods of release . Channel Checks shall be made at least once per 24 hours on days on which continuous, periodic, or batch releases are made. NOTE 4: The Channel Functional Test shall demonstrate that: a. Control Room alarm annunciation occurs if the instrument indicates measured levels are above alann/trip setpoint b. The Instrument mode selection control automatically resets to "operate" mode when released.

NOTE 5: Monitors 1-RM-GW-178-1, 1-RM-VG-179-1, and 1-RM-VG-180-1 are electronically source checked using an LED . VIRGINIA POWER Intentionally Blank VPAP-2103 . REVISION 6 PAGE 110 OF 156 * * *

  • * ** VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 18 (Page 1 of2) Critical Organ and Inhalation Dose ,Factors for Surry . (Critical Pathway Dose Factors) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6_ PAGE 111 OF 156 Ventilation Vent D/Q = 9.0E-10 m-2 at 5150 meters S Direction Process Vent D/Q = 4.3E-10 m-2 at 5150 meters S Direction Radionuclide RMivv RMipv mrem/yr mrem/yr Curie/sec Curie/sec H-3 7.20E+02 3.12E+02 Mn-54 ND ND. Fe-59 ND ND Cr-51 6.45E+Ol 3.08E-t01 Co-58 ND ND Co-60 ND ND Zn-65 ND ND Rb-86 NO-ND Sr-89 ND ND Sr-90 ND ND Y-91 ND ND Zr-95 ND ND Nb-95 ND ND Ru-103 ND ND Ru-106 ND ND Ag-llOm ND ND Te-127m 8.06E+04 3.85E+04 Te-129m l.25E+05 5.98E+04 1-131 6.21E+08 2.97E+08 1-133 5.79E+06 2.77E+06 Cs-134 ND ND Cs-136 ND ND Cs-137 ND ND Ba-140 ND -ND Ce-141 ND ND Ce-144 ND ND
  • ND -No data for dose factor according to Regulatory Guide 1.109, Revision 1 VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 18 (Page 2 of 2) Critical Organ and Inhalation Dose Factors for Surry (Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 112 OF 156 Ventilation Vent X)Q = 3.0E-07 sec/m 3 at 5150 meters S Direction Process Vent X)Q = 1.3E-07 sec/m 3 at 5150 meters S Direction Radionuclide RMivv RMipv mrem/yr mrem/yr Curie/sec Curie/sec H-3 1.94E+02 8.41E+Ol Cr-51 l.73E+Ol 7.48E+OO Mn-54 ND ND Fe-59 ND ND Co-58 ND ND Co-60 ND ND Zn-65 ND ND Rb-86 ND ND Sr-89 ND ND Sr-90 ND ND Y-91 ND ND Zr-95 ND ND Nb-95 ND ND Ru-103 ND ND Ru-106 ND ND Ag-llOm ND ND Te-I27m 1.46E+03
  • 6.33E+02 Te-129m 1.64E+03 7.12E+02 1-131 4.45E+06 1.93E+06 1-133 1.07E+06 4.63E+05 Cs-134 ND ND Cs-136 ND ND Cs-137 ND ND Ba-140 ND ND Ce-141 ND ND Ce-144 ND ND ND -No data for dose factor according to Regulatory Guide 1.109, Revision 1 * * *
  • * ** VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 19 (Page 1 of 1) Critical Organ Dose Factors for. North Anna (Critical Pathway Dose Factors) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 113 OF 156 Ventilation Vent D/Q = 2.4E-09 m-2 at 3250 meters N Direction Process Vent D/Q = 1.lE-09 m-2 at 3250 meters N Direction Radionuclide RMi~v RMipv. mrem/yr mrem/yr Curie/sec Curie/sec H-3 l.73E+03 9.36E+02 Mn-54 ND ND Fe-59 ND ND Cr-51 1.50E+02 6.89E+Ol Co-58 ND ND Co-60 ND ND Zn-65 ND ND Rb-86 ND ND Sr-89 ND ND .... Sr-90 ND ND Y-91
  • ND ND Zr-95 ND ND Nb-9~ ND ND Ru-103 ND ND Ru-106 ND ND Ag-llOm ND ND Te-127m l.97E+05 9.04E+04 Te-129m 2.95E+05 l.35E+05 1-131 1.45E+09 6.72E+08 1-133 l.33E+07 6.12E+06 Cs-134 ND ND *-* Cs-136 ND ND .. Cs-137 ND ND .. -. Ba-140 ND ND Ce-141 ND ND Ce-144 ND ND .. ND -No data for dose factor according to Regulatory Gmde 1.109, Rev1S1on 1 VIRGINIA POWER Intentionally Blank VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 114 OF 156 * * *
  • * ** VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 20 (Page 1 of 3)_ VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 115 OF 1.56 Surry Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Exposure Pathway Number of Sample and Collection Type and Frequency of and/or Sample Sample Location Frequency Analysis 1. DIRECT RADIATION About 40 Routine Monitoring Stations to be placed as follows: 1) Inner Ring in general area of site boundary GAMMA DOSE with station in each sector 2) Outer Ring 6 to 8 km from the site with a Quarterly Quarterly station in each sector 3) The balance of the 8 dosimeters should be *placed in special interest areas such as population centers, nearby residents, schools, and in 2 or 3 areas to serve as controls 2. AIRBORNE Samples from 7 locations:

a) 1 sample from close to the site boundary* location of the highest Radioiodine Canister calculated annual 1 131 Analysis Weekly average ground level Continuous Radioiodines and D/Q Sampler Particulates b) 5 sample locations 6-8 operation with Particulate Sampler km distance located in a sample collection Gross beta radioactivity concentric ring around weekly analysis following filter the Station change; c) 1 sample from a control . location 15-30 km Gamma isotopic analysis distant, providing valid of compo-site (by background data location) quarterly VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 20 (Page 2 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 116 OF 156 Surry Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Exposure Pathway Number of Sample and Collection Type and Frequency of and/or Sample Sample Location Frequency Analysis 3. WATERBORNE a) 1 sample upstream Gamma isotopic analysis a) Surface Monthly Sample monthly; b) 1 sample downstream Composite for tritium analysis quarterly b) Ground Sample from 1 or 2 sources Quarterly Gamma isotopic and tritium analysis quarterly c) Sediment 1 sample from downstream Gamma isotopic analysis from area with existing or Semi-Annually shoreline potential recreational value semi-annually d) Silt 5 samples from vicinity of Semi-Annually Gamma isotopic analysis the Station semi .:annual! y 4. INGESTION a) Mille a) 3 samples from millcing (NOTE 1) animals in the vicinity of the Station Gamma isotopic and I 131 b) 1 sample from millcing Monthly animals at a control analysis monthly location (15-30 km distant) a) 2 samples of oysters in the vicinity of the Semi-Annually Gamma isotopic on edibles Station b) 4 samples of clams in the vicinity of the Semi-Annually Gamma isotopic on edibles b) Fish and Station Invertebrates c) 1 sampling of crabs from the vicinity of the Annually Gamma isotopic on edibles Station d) 2 samples of fish from the vicinity of the Semi-Annually Gamma isotopic on edibles Station (catfish, white -perch, eel) * * *

  • * ** VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 20 (Page 3 of 3) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 117 OF 156 Surry Radiological Environmental Monitoring Progr~m Exposure Pathway Number of Sample and Collection Type and Frequency of and/or Sample Sample Location Frequency Analysis 4. INGESTION (Continued) a) 1 sample com Gamma isotopic on edible b) 1 sample soybeans Annually portion c) 1 sample peanuts d) 1 sample of a broadleaf vegetation of two different available offsite locations with highest annual average c) Food ground level D/Q, if one Products or more milk samples Monthly, if Gamma isotopic and 1 131 are unavailable available, or at e) 1 sample of a broadleaf harvest analysis vegetation grown 15-30 km in the available, least prevalent wind direction, if one or more milk samples are unavailable NOTE 1: If milk sampling cannot be performed, use item 4.c (d) .

VIRGINIA POWER Intentionally Blank VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 118 OF 156 * * *

  • * ** VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 21 (Pagel of 5) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 119 OF 156 North Anna Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Exposure Pathway Number of Sample and Collection Type and Freq_uency of . and/or Sample Sample Location (NOTE 2) . Frequency Analysis 1. DIRECT RADIATION (NOTE 3) 36 routine monitoring stations, either with two or more dosimeters or with one instrument for measuring and recording dose rate continuously, to be placed as follows: 1) An inner ring of stations, one in each emergency GAMMA DOSE meteorological sector within the site boundary 2) An outer ring of stations, one in each emergency Quarterly Quarterly meteorological sector within 8 km range from the site 3) The balance of the
  • stations to be placed in special interest areas such as population centers, nearby residences, schools, and in 1 or 2 areas to serve as control stations VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 21 (Page 2 of 5) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 120 OF 156 North Anna Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Exposure Pathway Number of Sample and Collection Type and Frequency of* and/or Sample Sample Location (NOTE 2) Frequency An~lysis 2. AIRBORNE Samples from 5 locations:

a) 3 samples from close to the 3 site boundary locations (in different Radioiodine Canister sectors) of the highest I 131 Analysis, weekly calculated historical annual average ground Continuous Radioiodines and level D/Q sampler, Particulates b) 1 sample from the operation with vicinity of a community sample Particulate Sampler having the highest collection Gross beta radioactivity calculated annual weekly analysis following filter average ground level change; (NOTE 4) D/Q c) 1 sample from a control Gamma isotopic analysis location 15-40 km of composite (by distant and in the least location) quarterly prevalent wind directior (NOTE 5) 3. WATERBORNE Samples from 3 locations: a) 1 sample upstream Gamma isotopic analysis monthly; (NOTE 5) a) Surface b) 1 sample downstream Grab Monthly Composite for tritium c) 1 sample-from cooling analysis quarterly lagoon b) Ground Sample from 1 or 2 sources Grab Quarterly Gamma isotopic and tritium only if likely to be affected analysis quarterly (NOTE 5) 1 sample from downstream Gamma isotopic analysis c) Sediment area with existing or Semi-Annually potential recreational value s~mi-annually (NOTE 5) * * *

  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 21 (Page 3 of 5) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 121 OF 156 North Anna Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Exposure Pathway Number of Sample and Sample Collection Type and Frequency of and/or Sample Location (NOTE 2) Frequency Analysis 4. INGESTION a) Samples from milking animals in 3 locations within 5 km that have the highest potential.

If there are none, then 1 sample from milking animals in each of 3 areas a) Mille between 5 to 8 km where Monthly at all Gamma isotopic (NOTE 5) (NOTE 7) doses are calculated to be times and 1 131 analysis monthly greater than 1 mrem per yr (NOTE 6) b) 1 sample from milking animals at a control location (15-30 km in the least prevalent wind direction) a) 1 sample of commercially and recreationally important species (bass, sunfish, catfish) b) Fish and* in vicinity of plant discharge Semiannually Gamma isotopic on edible Invertebrates area portions b) 1 sample of same species in areas not influenced by plant discharge a) Samples of an edible broaq leaf vegetation grown nearest each of two different off site locations of highest predicted historical annual average Monthly if -c) Food ground level 0/Q if millc Gamma isotopic (NOTE 5) Products sampling is not performed available, or and 1 131 analysis b) I sample of broad leaf at.harvest . -** vegetation grown 15-30 km in the least prevalent wind -direction if millc sampling is not performed VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 21 (Page 4 of 5) VPAP-2103. REVISION 6 PAGE 122 OF 156 North Anna Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program NOTE 1: The number, media, frequency, and location of samples may vary from site to site. This table presents an acceptable minimum program for a site at which each entry is applicable. Local site characteristics must be examined to determine if pathways not covered by this table may significantly contribute to an individual's dose and be included in the sampling program. NOTE 2: For each and every sample location in Attachment 21, specific parameters of distance and direction sector from the centerline of the reactor, and additional description where pertinent, shall be provided in Attachment

23. Refer to Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Positions and to NUREG-0133, Preparation of Radiological Effluent Technical Specifi~ations for Nuclear Power Plant. Deviations are permitted from the required sampling schedule if specimens are unattainable due to hazardous conditions, seasorial unavailability, malfunction of automatic sampling equipment and other legitimate reasons.
  • If specimens are unattainable due to sampling equipment malfunction, every effort shall be
  • made to complete corrective action before the end of the next sampling period. All deviations from the sampling schedule shall be documented in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to 6. 7 .1. It is recognized that, at times, it may not be possible or practicable to continue to obtain samples of the media of choice at the most desired location or time. In these instances, suitable alternative media and locations may be chosen for the particular pathway in question and appropriate substitutions made within 30 days in the radiological environmental monitoring program. In lieu of a Licensee Event Report and pursuant to 6. 7 .2, identify the cause of the unavailability of samples for that pathway and identify the new locations for obtaining replacement samples in the next Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report, and include revised figures and tables from the ODCM reflecting the new locations in the report. *
  • * ** VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 21 (Page 5 of 5) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 123 OF 156 North Anna Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program NOTE 3: One or qiore instruments, such as a pressurized ion chamber, for measuring and recording
  • dose rate continuously may be used in place of, or in addition to, integrating dosimeters.

For the purposes of this table, a thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) is considered to be . one phosphor; two or more phosphors in a packet.are considered as two or more dos_imeters. Film badges shall not be used as dosimeters for measuring direct radiation. The 36 stations are not an absolute number. The number of direct radiation monitoring stations may be reduced according to geographical -limitations, e.g., at an ocean site, some sectors will be over water so that the number of dosimeters may be reduced accordingly. The frequency of analysis or readout for TLD systems will depend upon the characteristics of the specific systei:n used and should be selected to obtain optimum dose information with minimal fading. NOTE 4: Airborne particulate sample filters shall be analyzed for gross beta radioactivity 24 hours or more after sampling to allow for radon and thoron daughter decay. If gross beta activity in air particulate samples is greater than ten times the yearly mean of control samples, gamma isotopic analysis shall be performed on the individual samples. NOTE 5: Gamma isotopic analysis is the identification and quantj.fication of gamma-emitting radionuclides that may be attributable to effluents from the facility. NOTE 6: The dose shall be calculated for the maximum organ and age group, using the methodology and parameters in the ODCM. NOTE 7: If milk sampling cannot be performed, use item 4.c (Page 3 of 5, Attachment

21)

VIRGINIA POWER Intentionally Blank **, VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 124 OF 156 * * *

  • * ** VIRGINIA POWER *sAMPLE MEDIA Air Charcoal and Particulate Environmental TLDs ATTACHMENT 22 (Page 1 of 4) Surry Environmental Sampling Locations LOCATION DISTANCE DIRECTION (MR.ES) Surry Station (SS) b.37 NNE Hog Island Reserve (HIR) 2.0 NNE Bacons Castle (BC) 4.5 SSW Alliance (ALL) 5.1 WSW Colonial Parkway (CP) 3.7 NNW Dow .Chemical

.. (DOW) 5.1 ENE Fort Eustis (FE) 4.8 ESE Newport News (NN) 16.5 ESE Control (00) West North West (02) 0.17 WNW Surry Station Discharge 0.6 NW (03) North North West (04) 0.4 NNW North (05) 0.29 N North North East (06) 0.28 NNE North East (07) 0.31 NE East North East (08) 0.43 ENE East (Exclusion) (09) 0.31 E West (10) 0.40 w West South West (11) 0.45 WSW South West (12) .0.30 SW South South West (13) 0.43 SSW South (14) 0.48 s South South East (15) 0.74 SSE South East (16) 1.00 SE East (17) 0.57 E Station Intake (18) 1.23 ESE Hog Island Reserve (19) 1.94 .NNE VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 1250F 156 REMARKS Site Boundary Location at Sector with Highest D/Q Control Location Onsite ** Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Onsite Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Site Boundary Near Resident VIRGINIA POWER SAMPLE MEDIA Environmental TLDs Milk ATTACHMENT 22 (Page 2 of 4) Surry Environmental

  • sampling Locations LOCATION DISTANCE DIRECTION (MILES) Bacons Castle (20) 4.45 SSW Route 633 (21) 3.5 SW Alliance (22) 5.1 WSW Surry (23) 8.0 WSW Route 636 and 637 (24) 4.0 w Scotland Wharf (25) 5.0 WNW Jamestown (26) 6.3 NW Colonial Parkway (27) 3.7 NNW Route 617 and 618 (28) 5.2 NNW Kingsmill (29) 4.8 N Williamsburg (30) 7.8 N Kingsmill North (31) 5.6 NNE Budweiser (32) 5.7 NNE Water Plant (33) 4.8 NE Dow (34) 5.1 ENE Lee Hall (35) 7.1 ENE Goose Island (36) 5.0 E Fort Eustis (37) 4.8 ESE Newport News (38) 16.5 ESE James River Bridge (39) 14.8 SSE Benn's Church (40) 14.5 s Smithfield (41) 11.5 s Rushmere (42) 5.2 SSE Route 628 (43) 5.0 s Epp's 4.8 SSW Colonial Parkway 3.7 NNW Judkin's 6.i SSW -William's 22.5 s VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 126 OF 156 REMARKS Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Population Center Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Population Center Approx. 5 miles Population Center Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Population Center Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Population Center Control Control Control Approx. 5 miles Approx. 5 miles Control Location * * *
  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER SAMPLE MEDIA Well Water Crops (Com, Peanuts, Soybeans)

Crops (Cabbage, Kale) River Water (Monthly) Sediment (Silt) ATTACHMENT 22 (Page 3 of 4). Surry Environmental Sampling Locations LOCATION DISTANCE DIRECTION (MILES) Surry Station Hog Island Reserve 2.0 NNE Slade's Fann 2.4 s Brock's Fann 3.8 s Spratley's Garden 3.2 s Carter's Grove Garden 4.8 NE Lucas's Garden Surry Discharge 0.17 NW Scotland Wharf 5.0 WNW Chickahominy River 11.2 WNW Surry Station Intake 1.9 . ESE Surry Station Discharge 1.0 NNW Hog Island Point 2.4 NE Point of Shoals 6.4 SSE VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 127 OF 156 REMARKS Onsite*** Control Location (Chester, Va.) Control Location -. Control Location VIRGINIA POWER SAMPLE MEDIA Clams Oysters Crabs *Fish Shoreline Sediment ATTACHMENT 22 (Page 4 of 4) Surry Environmental Sampling Locations

  • LOCATION DISTANCE DIRECTION (MILES) Chickahominy River 11.2 WNW Surry Station Discharge 1.3 NNW Hog Island Point 2.4 NE Lawne's Creek 2.4 SE Walnut Point 2.0 EENE Mulberry Point 4.9 EESE Surry Station Discharge 0.6 NW Surry Station Discharge 0.6 NW Hog Island Reserve 0.8 N ** Onsite Location -in Lead Shield VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 128 OF 156 REMARKS Control Location *** Onsite sample of Well Water-taken from tap-water at Surry Environmental Building ** * *
  • * ** VIRGINIA POWER Sample. Media Environment al 1LDs ATTACHMENT 23 (Page 1 of 4) VPAP-2103.

REVISION 6 PAGE 129 OF 156 North Anna Environmental Sampling Locations . Distance and Direction From Unit No. 1 Location Station Distance Direction Collection REMARKS No. (Miles) Frequency NAPS Sewage Treatment ., 01 0.20 NE Quarterly & On-Site Plant Annually Frederick's Hall 02 5.30 SSW Quarterly & Annually Mineral.VA 03 7.10 WSW Quarterly & Annually Wares Crossroads 04 5.10 WSW 1 (Juarterly & Annually Route 752 05 4.20 NNE Quarterly & Annually Sturgeon's Creek Marina 05A 3.20 N Quarterly & Annually Levy, VA 06 4.70 ESE Quarterly & Annually Bumpass, VA 07 7.30 SSE Quarterly & Annually End of Route 685 21 1.00 WNW Quarterly & Site Boundary Annually Route 700 22 1.00 WSW i(JUarterly & Site Boundary Annually "Aspen Hills" 23 0.93 SSE Quarterly & Site Boundary Annually Orange, VA 24 22.00 NW Quarterly & Control Annually Bearing Cooling Tower N-1/33 0.06 N Quarterly On-Site Sturgeon's Creek Marina N-2/34 3.20. N Quarterly Parking Lot "C" NNE-3/35 0.25 NNE Quarterly On-Site Good Hope Church NNE-4/36 4.96 NNE Quarterly ~arking Lot "B" NE-5/37 0.20 NE Quarterly On-Site Lake Anna Marina NE-6/38 1.49 NE Quarterly Weather Tower Fence ENE-7/39 0.36 ENE Quarterly On-Site Route 689 ENE-8/40 2.43 ENE Quarterly Near Training Facility E-9/41 0.30 E Quarterly On-Site "Morning Glory Hill" E-10/42 2.85 E Quarterly Island Dike ESE-11/43 0.12 ESE Quarterly On-Site Route 622 ESE-12/44 4.70 ESE* Quarterly VIRGINIA POWER Sample Media Environment al TLDs ATTACHMENT 23 (Page 2 of 4) North Anna Environmental Sampling Locations Distance and Direction From Unit No. 1 Location Station Distance. Direction No. (Miles) Biology Lab SE-13/45 0.75 SE Route 701 (Dam Entrance SE-14/46 5.88 SE "Aspen Hills" SSE-15/47 0.93 SSE Elk Creek SSE-16/48 2.33 SSE Warehouse Compound S-17/49 0.22 s Gate Elk Creek Church S-18/50 1.55 s NAPS Access Road SSW-19/51 0.36 SSW Route 618 SSW-20/52 5.30 SSW NAPS Access Road SW-21/53 0.30 SW Route 700 SW-22/54 4.36 SW 500KVTower WSW-23/55 0.40 WSW Route700 WSW-24/56 1.00 WSW NAPS Radio Tower W-25/57 0.31 w Route 685 W-26/58 1.55 w End of Route 685 WNW-27/59 1.00 WNW H. Purcell's Private Road WNW-28/60 1.52 WNW End of #1/#2 Intake NW-29/61 0.15 NW Lake Anna Campground NW-30/62 2.54 NW #1/#2 Intake NNW-31/63 0.07 NNW Route 208 NNW-32/64* 3.43 NNW* Bumpass Post Office . C-1/2 7.30 SSE Orange, VA C-3/4 22.00 NW Mineral, VA* C-5/6 7.10 WSW Louisa. VA C-7/8 11.54 WSW VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 130 OF 156 Collection REMARKS Freauency Quarterly On-Site Quarterly Quarterly Site B0unda11 Quarterly Quarterly On-Site Quarterly Quarterly On-Site Quarterly Quarterly On-Site Quarterly Quarterly On-Site Quarterly Site B0unda11 Quarterly On-Site Quarterly Quarterly Site Boundaf) Quarterly Quarterly On-Site Quarterly Quarterly On-Site Quarterly* Quarterly Control Quarterly Control* Quarterly Control Quarterly Control * * *

  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER Sample Media Airborne Particulate and Radioiodine Surface Water [Commitment 3.2.2] Ground Water (well water) Aquatic Sediment Shoreline Soil Soil ATTACHMENT 23 (Page 3 of 4) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 131 OF 156 North Anna Environmental Sampling Locations Distance and Direction From Unit No. I Location Station Distance Direction Collection R~MARKS No~ (Miles) Frequency NAPS Sewage Treatment 01 0.20 NE Weekly On-Site Plant Frederick's Hall 02 5.30 SSW Weekly Mineral, VA 03 7.10 WSW Weekly Wares Crossroads 04 5.10 WNW Weekly Route 752 05 4.20 NNE Weekly Sturgeon's Creek Marina 05A 3.20 N Weekly Levy, VA 06 4.70 ESE Weekly Bumpass, VA 07 7.30 SSE Weekly End of Route 685 21 1.00 WNW Weekly Site Boundary Route 700 22 1.00 WSW Weekly Site Boundary "Aspen Hills" 23 0.93 SSE Weekly Site Boundary Orange, VA 24 22.00 NW Weekly Control Waste Heat Treatment Facility (Second Cooling 08 1.10 SSE Monthly Lagoon) North Anna River (upstream)

Rt 669 Bridge 09A 12.9 WNW Monthly Control (Brook's Bridge) North Anna River 11 5.80 SE Monthly (downstream) Biology Lab OlA 0.75 SE Quarterly Waste Heat Treatment Facility (Second Cooling 08 1.10 SSE Semi-Annually Lagoon) North Anna River (upstream) Rt 669 Bridge 09A 12.9 WNW Semi-Annually Control (Brook's Bridge) North Anna River 11 5.80 *SE Semi-Annually ( downstream) Lake Anna (upstream) 09 2.20 NW Semi-Annually NAPS Sewage Treatment 01 0.20 NE Once per 3 yrs On-Site Plant VIRGINIA

  • POWER Sample Media Soil ( continued)

Milk Fish Food Products (Broad Leaf vegetation) ATTACHMENT 23 (Page 4 of 4) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 132 OF 156 North Anna Environmental Sampling Locations Distance and Direction From Unit No. 1 Location Station Distance Direction Collection REMARKS No. (Miles) Frequency Fredericks Hall 02 5.30 SSW Once per 3 yrs Mineral, VA 03 7.10 WSW Once per 3 yrs Wares Crossroads 04 5.10 WNW Once per 3 yrs Route 752 05 4.20 NNE Once per 3 yrs Sturgeon's Creek Marina 05A 3.20 N Once per 3 yrs Levy, VA 06 4.70 ESE Once per 3 yrs Bumpass, VA 07 7.30 SSE Once per 3 yrs End of Route 685 21 1.00 WNW Once per 3 yrs Site Boundary Route 700 22 1.00 WSW Once per 3 yrs Site Bo~dary "Aspen Hills" 23 0.93 SSE Once per 3 yrs Site Boundary Orange, VA 24 22.00 NW Once per 3 yrs Control. .Holladay Dairy (R.C. Goodwin) 12 8.30 NW Monthly Terrell's Dairy 13 (Frederick's Hall) 5.60 SSE Monthly Waste Heat Treannent Semi-Facility (Second Cooling 08 1.10 SSE ,Annually Lagoon) . Lake Orange 25 16.50 NW Semi-Control Annually Route 713 14 varies NE Route 614 15 varies SE Monthly Route 629/522 16 varies NW if available, or Control Route 685 21 varies WNW at harvest "Aspen Hills" Area 23 varies SSE * * *

  • * ** VIRGINIA POWER Analysis {NOTE2)
  • Gross beta H-3 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58, 60 Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 ATTACHMENT 24 (Page 1 of 2) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 133 OF 156 Detection Capabili~ies for Surry Environmental Sample Analysis LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD) Airborne
  • Fish Food .Sediment Water Particulate (pCi/kg) Milk Products (pCi/kg) (pCi/1) or Gases* (pCi/1) (pCi/kg) (pCi/m3) (wet) (wet) (wet) .4 0.01 2,000 15 130 30 260 15 130 30 260 30 15 (NOTE3) 1 0.07 1 60 15 0.05 130 15 60 150 18 0.06 150 18 80 180 60 60 15 15 NOTE 1:
  • Required detection capabilities for thermoluminescent dosimeters used for environmental measurements are given in Regulatory Guide 4.13. NOTE 2: This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be detected and reported.

Other peaks that are measurable and identifiable, together with the above nuclides, shall also be identified. and reported. NOTE 3: LLD for the Ground (drinking) Water Samples. The LLD for the surface (non-drinking) water samples is 10 pCi/1 . VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 24 (Page 2 of2) VPAP-2103. REVISION 6 PAGE 134 OF 156 Detection Capabilities for Surry Environmental Sample Anaiysis LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD) NOTE 1: For a particular measurement system (which may include radioc;:hemical separatio~): LLD= E

  • V
  • 2.22E+06
  • Y
  • e-(A.at) (24-1) Where: LLD = the "a priori" (before the fact) Lower Limit of Detection as defined above (as microcuries per unit mass or volume) (see 4.8) Sb = the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank_ sample as appropriate (as counts per minute, cpm) E = the counting efficiency (as counts per disintegration)

V = the sample size (in units of mass or volume) 2.22E+06 y A. at = = = = the number of disintegrations per minute (dpm) per microcurie the fractional radiochemical yield (when applicable) the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide the elapsed time between sample collection ( or end of the sample collection period) and time of counting (for environmental samples, not plant effluent samples) Typical values of E, V, Y and ~t should be used in the calculation. The LLD is an "a priori" (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not a "posteriori" (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement.

  • * *
  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 25 (Page 1 of 2) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6_ PAGE 135 OF 156 Detection Capabilities for North Anna Environmental Sample Analysis LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD) .Airborne Fish . Food *Sediment*.

Analysis Water Particulate (pCi/kg) Milk Products (pCi/kg) (NOTE2) (pCi/1) or Gases (pCi/1) (pCi/kg) (pCi/m3) (wet) (wet) (wet) Gross beta 4 0.01 . H-3 2,000 Mn-54 15 130 Fe-59 30 260 Co-58, 60 15 130 Zn-65 30 260 Zr-95 30 Nb-95 15 1-131 (NOTE 3) 1 0.07 1 60 Cs-134 15 0.05 130 15 60 150 Cs-137 18 0.06 150 18 80 180 Ba-140 60 60 La-140 15 15 NOTE 1: Required detection capabilities for thermoluminescent dosimeters used for environmental measurements are given in Regulatory Guide 4.13. NOTE 2: This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be detected and reported. Other peaks that are measurable and identifiable, together with the above nuclides, shall also be identified and reported. NOTE 3: LLD for the ground (drinking) water samples. The LLD for the surface (non-drinking) . water samples is 10 pCi/1 . VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 136 OF 156 ATTACHMENT 25 (Page 2 of 2) Detection Capabilities for. North Anna Environmental Sample Analysis LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD) (NOTE 3) NOTE 3: For a particular measurement system (which may include radiochemical separation): LLD= 4.66 Sb (25-1) E

  • V
  • 2.22E+06
  • Y
  • e-(A.At) Where: LLD = the "a priori" (before the fact) Lower Limit of Detection as defined above (as microcuries per unit mass or volume) (see 4.9) Sb = the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (as counts per minute, cpm) E = the counting efficiency (as counts per disintegration)

V = the sample size (in units of mass or volume) 2.22E+06 = the number of disintegrations per minute (dpm) per microcurie y = the fractional radiochemical yield ( when applicable) A = the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide At = the elapsed time between sample collection (or end of the sample c_ollection period) and time of counting (for environmental samples, not plant effluent samples) Typical values of E, V, Y and At should be used in the calculation. The LLD is an "a *priori" (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not a "posteriori" (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement

  • * *
  • * ** VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 26 (Page 1 of 1) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 137 OF 156 Reporting Levels for Radioactivity Concentrations in Environmental Samples at Surry Water Airborne Fish Milk Food Products Analysis (pCi/1) Particulate or (pCi/kg, wet) (pCi/1) * (pCi/kg, wet) Gases (pCi/m3) H-3 30,000 Mn-54 1,000 30,000 Fe-59 400 10,000 Co-58 1,000 30,000 Co-60 300 10,000 Zn-65 300 20,000 Zr-Nb-95 400 I-131 (NOTE 1) 2 0.9 3 100 Cs-134 30 . 10 1,000 60 1,000*
  • Cs-137 ~o 20 2,000 70 2,000 Ba-La-140 200 300 NOTE 1: Reporting level for the ground (drinking) water samples required by Attachment
20. The reporting level for the surface (non-drinking) water samples required by Attachment 20 is 20 pCi/1 .

VIRGINIA .. POWER Intentionally Blank VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 138 OF 156 * * *

  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 27 (Page 1 of 1) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 139 OF 156 Reporting Levels for Radioactivity Concentrations in Environmental Samples at North Anna Water Airborne Fish Milk Food Products Analysis (pCi/1) Particulate or (pCi/kg, :wet) *(pCi/1) '. (pCi/kg, wet)
  • Gases (pCi/m3) .. H-3 (NOTE 1) 20,000 Mn-54 1,000 30,000 Fe-59 400 10,000 Co-58 1,000 30,000 Co-60 300 10,000 Zn-65 300 20,000 Zr-Nb-95 400 I-131 2 0.9 3 100 Cs-134 30 10 1,000 60 1,000 Cs-137 50 20 2,000 70 2,000 Ba-La-140 200 300 NOTE I: For drinking water samples VIRGINIA POWER LI ___ 1_n_te_n_ti_o_na_1_1y_e_1_a_n_k

___ l

  • VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 140 OF 156 ** *
  • i __ j
  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 28 (Page 1 of 8) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 141 OF 156 Surry Meteorological, Liquid, and Gaseous Pathway Analysis 1.0 METEORLOGICAL ANALYSIS 1.1 Purpose The purpose of the meteorological analysis wasto*determine the annual average X/Q and D/Q values at critical locations around the Station for ventilation vent (ground level) and process vent (mixed mode) releases.

The annual average X/Q and D/Q values were used in a dose pathway analysis to determine both the maximum exposed in.dividual at site boundary and

  • member of the public. The X/Q and D/Q values resulting in the maximum exposures were incorporated into the dose factors in Attachments 12 and 18. 1.2 Meteorological Data, Parameters, and Methodology Onsite meteorological data for the period January 1, 1979, through December 31, 1981, were used in calculations.

These data included wind speed, wind direction, and differential temperature for the purpose of determining joint frequency distributions for those releases characterized as ground level (i.e., ventilation vent), and those characterized as mixed mode (i.e., process vent). The portions of release characterized as ground level were based on ATis8.9ft-28.2ft and 28.2 foot wind data, and the portions characterized as mixed mode wer~ based on ATts8.9ft-28.2ft and 158.9 ft wind data. X/Qs and D/Qs were calculated using the N~C computer code "XOQDOQ -Program for the Meteorological Evaluation of Routine Effluent Releases at Nuclear Power Stations:', September, 1977. The code is based upon a straight line airflow model implementing the assumptions outlined in Section C .( excluding C 1 a and CI b) of Regulatory Guide 1.111, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water-Cooled Reactors." The open terrain adjustment factors were applied to the X/Q values as recommended in Regulatory Guide 1.111. The site region is characterized flat terrain sucb that open terrain correction factors are considered appropriate. The ground level ventilation vent release calculations included a building wake correction based on a 1516 m2 containment minimum cross-sectional area. The effective release height used in mixed-mode release calculations was based on a process vent release height of 131 ft, and plume rise due to momentum for a vent . diameter of 3 in. with plume exit velocity of 100 ft/sec. VIRGINlA POWER ATTACHMENT 28 (Page 2 of 8) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 142 OF 156 Surry Meteorological, Liquid, and Gaseous Pathway Analysis Ventilation vent, and vent releases other than from the process vent, are considered ground level as specified in Regulatory Guide 1.111 for release points less than the height of adjacent solid structures. Terrain elevations were obtained from Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2 Virginia Electric and Power Company Updated Final Safety Analysis Report Table l lA-8. X/Q and D/Q values were calculated for the nearest site boundary, resident, milk cow, and vegetable garden by sector for process vent and ventilation vent releases. X/Q values were also calculated for the nearest discharge canal bank for process and ventilation vent releases. According to the definition for short term in NUREG-0133, "Preparation of Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications for Nuclear Power Stations," October, 1978, some gaseous releases may fit this category, primarily waste g!is decay tank releases and containment purges. However, these releases are considered long term for dose calculations as past releases were both random in time of day and duration as evidenced by reviewing past release reports. Therefore, the use of annual average concentrations is appropriate according to NUREG-0133 . 1.3 Results The X/Q value that resulted in the maximum total body, skin, and inhalation exposure for ventilation vent releases was 6.0E-05 sec/m3 at a site boundary location 499 meters N sector. For process vent releases, the site boundary X/Q value was l .OE-06 sec/m3 at a location 644 meters sector. The discharge canal bank X/Q value that resulted in the maximum inhalation exposure for ventilation vent releases was 7. 8E-05 sec/m3 at a location 290 meters NW sector. The discharge can~ bank X/Q value for process vent was l .6E-06 sec/m3 at a location 290 meters NW sector. Path way analysis indicated that the maximum exposure from I 131 , I 133 , and from all . . radionuclides in particulate form with_half-lives greater than 8 days, was through the grass-. cow-milk pathway. The D/Q value from ventilation vent releases resulting in the maximum exposure was 9;0E-10 per m2 at a location 5150 meters S sector. For process vent releases, the . . -D/Q value was 4.3E-I0 per m2 at a location 5150 meters S sector. For tritium, the X/Q value *

  • from ventilation vent releases resulting in the maximum exposure for the milk pathway was 3.0E-07 sec/m3, and l.3E-07 sec/m3 for process vent releases at a iocation 5150 meters S sector. The inhalation pathway is the only other pathway existing at this location.

Therefore, the X/Q values given for tritium also apply for the inhalation pathway. *

  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 28 (Page 3 of 8) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 143 OF 156 Surry M~teorological, Liquid, and Gaseous Pathway Analysis 2.0 LIQUID PATHWAY ANALYSIS 2.1 Purpose The purpose of the liquid pathway analysis was* to determine the maximum exposed_ member of the public in unrestricted areas as a result ofradioactive liquid effluent releases.

The analysis included a detennination of most restrictive liquid pathway, most restrictive age group, and critical organ. This analysis is required for Subsection 6.2, Liquid Radioactive Waste Effluents. 2.2 Data, Parameters, and Methodology Radioactive liquid effluent release data for the years 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, and 1981 were compiled from the Surry Power Station effluent release reports. The data for each year, along with appropriate site specific parameters and default selected parameters, were entered into the NRC computer code LADTAP as described in NUREG-0133 . Liquid radioactive effluents from both units are released to the James River via the discharge canal. :possible pathways of exposure for release from the Station include ingestion of fish and invertebrates and shoreline activities. The irrigated food pathway and potable water pathway do not exist at this location. Access to the discharge canal by the general public is gained two ways: bank fishing, controlled by the Station and limited to Virginia Power employees or guests of employees, and by boat as far upstream as the inshore end of the discharge. canal . groin. It has been estimated that boat sport fishing would be performed a maximum of 800 hours per year, and that bank fishing would be performed a maximum of 160 hours per year. For an individual fishing in the discharge canal, no river dilution was assumed for the fish pathway. For an individual located beyond the discharge canal groins, a river dilution factor of 5 was assumed as appropriate according to Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1, and the fish, invertebrate, and shoreline pathways were considered to exist. Dose factors, bioaccumulation factors, and shore width factors given in Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1, and in LADT AP were used, as were usage terms for shoreline activities and ingestion of fish and invertebrates. Dose to an individual fishing on the discharge bank was determined by multiplying the annual dose calculated with LADT AP. by the fractional year the individual spent fishing in the canal. VIRGINIA POWER 2.3 Results ATTACHMENT 28 (Page 4 of 8) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 144 OF 156 Surry Meteorological, Liquid, and G~eous Pathway Analysis For the years 1976, 1977, 1979, 1980, and 1981, the invertebrate pathway resulted in the largest dose. In 1978 the fish pathway*resulted*in thelargestdose:-The maximum exposed member of the public was determined to utilize the James River. The critical age group was the adult*and the critical organ was either the thyroid or GI-LLI. The ingestion dose factor, Ai, in 6.2.3 includes the fish and invertebrate pathways. Ai dose factors were calculated for the total body, thyroid, and GI-LLI organs. 3.0 GASEOUS PATHWAY ANALYSIS 3.1 .Purpose A gaseous effluent pathway analysis was performed to determine the location that would result in the maximum doses due to noble gases, for use in demonstrating compliance with 6.3.1.a.

  • and 6.3.3.a. The analysis also included a determination of the location, pathway, and critical
  • organ, of the maximum exposed member uf the public, as a result of the release* of I 131; I 133 , tritium, ~nd for all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than eight days for use in demonstrating compliance with 6.3.4.a. In addition, the analysis included a determination of the critical organ, maximum age group, and sector location of an exposed individual through the inhalation pathway from I 131 , I 133 , tritium, and particulates to demonstrate compliance with 6.3.1.a..

3.2 Data, Parameters, and Methodology Annual average X/Q values were calculated, as described in Section 1 of this attachment, for the nearest site boundary in each directional sector and at other critical locations accessible to the public inside site boundary. The largest X/Q value was determined to be 6.0E-05 sec/m3 at site boundary for ventilation vent releases at a location 499 meters N direction, and l.OE-06 sec/m3 at site boundary for process vent releases at a location 644 meters S d~ection. The maximum doses to total body and skin, and air doses for gamma and beta.radiation due to noble gases would be at these site boundary locations. The doses from both release points are summed in calculations to calculate total maximum dose. *

  • * ** VIRGINIA POWER VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 145 OF 156 ATTACHMENT 28 (Page 5 of 8) Surry Meteorological, Liquid, and Gaseous Pathway Analysis Step 6.3.1.a.2 dose limits apply specifically to the inhalation pathway. Therefore, the locations and XIQ values determined for maximum noble gas doses can be used to determine the maximum dose from I 131 , I 133 , tritium, and for all radionuclides in particulate form with lives greater than 8 days for the inhalation pathway. The NRC computer code GASP AR, "Evaluation of Atmospheric Releases," Revised 8/l 9n7, was run using 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, and 1981 Surry Power Station gaseous effluent release report data. Doses from I 131 , I 133 , tritium, and particulates for the inhalation pathway were calculated using the 6.0E-05 sec/m3 site boundary X/Q. Except for the source term data and the X/Q value, computer code default parameters were used. Results for each year indicated that the critical age group was the child and the critical organ was the thyroid for the inhalation pathway. In 1979, the teen was the critical age group. However, the dose calculated for the teen was only slightly greater than for the child and the doses could be considered
  • equivalent.

The gamma and beta dose factors Kivv, Livv, Mivv, and Nivv in Attachment 12 were obtained by performing a units conversion of the appropriate dose factors from Table B-1, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1, to mrem/yr per Cijm3 or mrad/yr per Ci/m3, and multiplying by the ventilation vent site boundary X/Q value of 6.0E-05 sec/m3. The same approach was used to calculate the gamma and beta dose factors Kipv, Lipv, Mipv, and Nipv in Attachment 12, using the process vent site boundary X/Q value of 1.0E-06 sec/m3. In~alation pathway dose factors Pivv and Pipv in Attachment 12 were calculated using the equation: Pi = K' (BR) DFAi (x/Q)(mrem/yr per Curie/sec) (28-1) where: K' = a constant of unit conversion, 1 E+ 12 pCi/Ci BR = the breathing rate of the child age group, 3700 m 3 /yr, from Table E-5, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev .1 DF Ai = the thyroid organ inhalation dose factor for child age group for the ith radionuclide, in'mrem/pCi, from Table E-9, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1 X/Q = the ventilation vent site boundary X/Q, 6.0E-5 sec/m3, or the process vent site boundary X/Q, 1.0E-06 se.c/m3, as appropriate VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 28 (Page 6 of 8) VPAP-2103 . REVISION 6 PAGE 146 OF 156 Surry Meteorological, Liquid, and Gaseous Pathway Analysis Step 6.3.4.a., requires that the dose to the maximum exposed member of the public from 1 131 ,* 1 133 , tritium, and from all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days be less than or equal to the specified limits. Dose calculations were performed for an exp.osed member of the public within site boundary unrestricted areas, discharge canal bank, and to an exposed member of the public beyond site boundary at real residences with the largest X/Q values using the NRC computer code GASPAR. Doses to members of the public were also calculated for the vegetable garden, meat animal, and milk-cow pathways with the largest D/Q

  • values using the NRC computer code GASPAR. It was determined that the member of the public within site boundary would be using the
  • discharge canal bank for fishing a maximum of 160 hours per year. The maximum annual X/Q at this location was determined to be 7 .8E-05 sec/m3 at 290 meters NW direction.

After applying a correction for the fractional part of year an individual would be fishing at this

  • location, the dose was calculated to be less than an individual would receive at site boundary.
  • The member of the public receiving the largest dose beyond site boundary was determined to be located 5150 meters S sector. The critical pathway was the grass-cow-milk, the maximum age group was the infant, and the critical organ the thyroid. For each year 197 6, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980 and 1981 the dose to the infant from the grass-cow-milk pathway was greater than the dose to the member of the public within site boundary, nearest residence, vegetable or meat pathways.

Therefore, the maximum exposed member of the public was determined to be the infant, exposed through the grass-cow-milk pathway, critical organ thyroid, at a location 5150 meters S sector. The only other pathway existing at this location for the infant is inhalation . *

  • * ** VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 28 (Page 7 of 8) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 147 OF 156 Surry Meteorological, Liquid, and Gaseous Pathway Analysis The RMivv ~nd RMipv dose factors, except for tritium, in Attachment 18 were calculated by multiplying the appropriate D/Q value with the following equation:

RM. 1 where: K' Qp Uap Yp Ys Fm r Df'Li Ai Aw tr th fp fs (28-2) = a constant of unit conversion, 1 E+ 12 pCi/Ci = cow's consumption rate, 50, in Kg/day (wet weight) = infant milk consumption rate, 330, liters/yr = agricultural productivity by unit area of pasture feed grass, 0.7 Kg!m2 = agricultural productivity by unit area of stored feed, 2.0, in Kg!m2 = stable element transfer coefficients, from Table E-1, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1 = fraction of deposited activity retained on cow's feed grass, 1.0 for radioiodine, and 0.2 for particulates = = = = = = = thyroid ingestion dose factor for the ith radionuclide for the infant, in mrem/pCi, . from Table E-14, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev.I decay constant for the ith radionuclide, in sec-1, from Table of Isotopes, Lederer, Hollander, and Perlman, sixth Edition. decay constant for removal of activity of leaf and plant surfaces by weathering, 5.73E-07 sec-1 (corresponding to a 14 day half-life) transport time from pasture to cow, to milk, to receptor, l.73+o5, in seconds transport time from pasture, to harvest, to cow, to milk, to receptor, 7.78E+o6, in seconds fraction of year that cow is on pasture, 0.67 (dimensionless), 7.78E+06 in seconds fraction of cow feed that is pasture grass while co-.y is on pasture, 1.0, dimensionless Parameters used above were obtained from NUREG-0133 and Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev .1. VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT28 (Page 8 of 8) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 148 OF 156 Surry Meteorological,* Liquid, and Gaseous Pathway Analysis Since the concentration of tritium in milk is based on the airborne concentration rather than the d_epositi.on, the following equation is used: (28-3) where: K"' = a constant of unit conversion 1E+03 gm/kg H = absolute humidity of the atmosphere, 8.0, grn/m3 0.75 = the fraction of total feed that is water 0.5 = the ratio of the specific activity of the feed grass to the atmospheric water X/Q = the annual average concentration at a location 5150 meters S sector, 3.0E-07 sec/m3 for ventilation vent releases, and l.3E-07 sec/m3 for the process vent releases Other parameters have been previously defined. The inhalation pathway dose factors Rlivv and Riipv in Attachment 18 were calculated using the following equation: where: K' = BR = DFAi = XIQ = ' Rii = K (BR) DFA/x/Q) (mrem/yr per Curie/sec) (28-4) a constant of unit conversion, IE+ 12 pCi/Ci breathing rate of the infant age group, 1400 m3/yr, from Table E-5, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev.I thyroid organ inhalation dose factor for infant age group for the ith radionuclide, in mrern/pCi, from Table E-10, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev.I ventilation vent X/Q, 3.0E-07 sec/m3, or the process vent site boundary X/Q, l.3E-07 sec/m3, at a location 5150 meters S sector. * * *

  • * ** VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 29 (Page 1 of 8) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 149 OF 156 North Anna Meteorological, Liquid, and Gaseous Pathway Analysis 1.0 METEOROLOGICAL ANALYSIS 1.1
  • Purpose The purpose of the meteorological analysis-was to determine .the annual average X/Q and D/Q values at critical locations around the Station.for ventilation vent (ground level) and process vent (mixed mode) releases.

The annual average X/Q and D/Q values were used to perform a dose pathway analysis to determine both the maximum exposed individual at site boundary and member of the public. The X/Q and D/Q values resulting in the maximum exposures were incorporated into the dose factors in Attachments 13 and 19. 1.2 Meteorological Data, Parameters, and Methodology Onsite meteorological data for the period January l, 1981, through December 31, 1981, were used in calculations. These data included wind speed, wind direction, and differential . . temperature for the purpose ofdetermining joint frequency distributions for those releases characterized as _ground level (e.g., ventilation vent), and those characterized as mixed mode (i.e., proce~s vent). The portions of release characterized as ground level were based on AT1s8.9ft-28.2ft and 28.2 foot wind data, and the portions characterized as mixed mode were based on AT1s8.9ft-28.2ft and 158.9 ft wind data. X/Q's and D/Q's were calculated using the NRC computer code "XOQDOQ-Program for the Meteorological Evaluation of Routine Effluent Releases at Nuclear Power Stations," September, 1977. The code is based upon a straight line airflow model implementing the assumptions outlined in Section C (excluding Cla and Clb) of Regulatory Guide 1.111, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water-Cooled 1:leactors." The open terrain adjustment factors were applied to the X/Q values as recommended in Regulatory Guide 1.111. The site region is characterized by gently rolling terrain so open terrain correction factors were considered appropriate. The ground level ventilation vent . release calculations included a building wake correction based on a 1516 m2 containment minimum cross-sectional area . ------~ VIRGINIA ** POWER ATTACHMENT 29 (Page 2 of 8) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6* PAGE 150 OF 156 North Anna Meteorological, Liquid~ and Gaseous Pathway Analysis The effective release height used in mixed mod_e release calculations was based on a process vent release height of 157 .5 ft, and plume rise due to momentum for a vent diameter of 3 in. with plume exit velocity of 100 ft/.sec .. Ventilation vent, ;and vent releases *other than from the process vent, are cons1.dered ground level as specified in Regulatory Guide 1.111 for release points less than the height of adjacent solid structures. Terrain elevations were obtained from North Anna Power Station Units 1 and 2, Virginia Electric and Power Company Final Safety Analysis Report Table 11 C.2-8. X/Q and D/Q values were calculated for the nearest site boundary, resident, milk cow, and vegetable garden by sector for process vent and ventilation vent releases at distances specified from North Anna Power Station Annual Environmental Survey Data.for i 981. X/Q values were also calculated for the nearest lake shoreline by sector for the process vent and ventilation vent releases. According to the definition for short term in NUREG-0133, "Preparation of Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications for Nuclear Power Stations," October, 1978, some gaseous releases may fit this category, primarily waste gas decay tank releases and containment purges. However, these releases are considered long term for dose calculations as past releases were both random in time of day and duration as evidenced by reviewing past release reports. Therefore, the use of annual average concentrations is appropriate according to NUREG-0133. The X/Q and 0/Q values calculated from 1981 meteorological data are comparable to the values presented in the North Anna Power Station UFSAR. 1.3 Results The X/Q value that resulted in the maximum total body, skin and inhalation exposure for ventilation vent releases was 9 .3E-06 sec/m3 at a site boundary location 1416 meters SE sector. For process vent releases, the site boundary X/Q value was 1.2E-06 sec/m3 at a location 1513 meters S sector. The shoreline X/Q value that resulted in the maximum inhalation exposure for ventilation vent releases was 1.0E-04 sec/m3 at a location 274 meters NNE sector. The shoreline X/Q value for process vent was 2. 7E-06 sec/m3 at a location 27 4 meters NNE sector. * * *

  • * ** VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 29 (Page 3 of 8) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 151 OF 156 North Anna Meteorological, Liquid, and Gaseous Pathway Analysis Pathway analysis indicated that the maximum exposure from 1-131, I 133 , and from an radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days was through the milk pathway. The D/Q value fromvent_ilation vent.releases resulting in the maximum exposure was 2.4E-09 per m2 at a location 3250 meters N sector. For process vent releases, the D/Q value was 1.lE-09 per m2 at a location 3250 meters N sector. For tritium, the X/Q value from ventilation vent releases resulting in the maximum exposure for the milk pathway was 7 2E-07 sec/m3, and 3.9E-07 sec/m3 for process vent releases at a location 3250 meters N sector. 2.0 LIQUID PATHWAY ANALYSIS 2.1 Purpose The purpose of the liquid pathway analysis was to determine the maximum exposed member of the public in unrestricted areas as a result of radioactive liquid effluent releases.

The analysis includes a determination of most restrictive liquid pathway, most restrictive age group, and critical organ. This analysis is required for Subsection 6.2. 2.2 Data, Parameters, and Methodology Radioactive liquid effluent release data for the years 1979, 1980, and 1981 were compiled from the North Anna Power Station semi-annual effluent release reports. The data for each year, alorig with appropriate site specific parameters and default selected parameters, were entered into the NRC computer code LADTAP as described in NUREG-0133. Re-concentration of effluents us~ng the small lake connected to larger water body model was selected with the appropriate parameters determined from Table 3.5.3.5, Design Data for Reservoir and Waste Heat Treatment Facility from Virginia Electric and Power Company, Applicant's Environmental Report Supplement, North Anna Power Station, Units 1 and 2, March 15, J 972. Dilution factors for aquatic foods, shoreline, and drinking water were set to one. Transit time calculations were based on average flow rates. All other parameters were . . defaults selected by the LADT AP computer code . VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 29 (Page 4 of 8) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 152 OF 156 North Anna Meteorological, Liquid, and Gaseous Pathway Analysis 2.3 Results For each year, the fish pathway resulted in the largest dose. The critical organ each year was the liver, and the adult and teenage age groups received the same organ dose. However, since the adult total body dose was greater than the teen total body dose for each year, the adult was selected as the most restrictive age group. Dose factors in Attachment 7 are for the maximum exposed member of the public, an adult, with the critical organ being the liver. 3.0 GASEOUS PATHWAY ANALYSIS 3.1 Purpose A gaseous effluent pathway analysis was performed to determine the location that would result in the maximum doses due to noble gases for use in demonstrating compliance with 6.3.1.a. and 6.3.3.a. The analysis also included a determination of the critical pathway, location of maximum exposed member of the public, and the critical organ for the maximum dose due to *1 131 , 1 133 , tritium, and for all radionuclides in partic1:1late form with half-lives greater than 8 days for use in-demonstrating compliance with requirements in 6.3.4.a.l . In addition, the analysis included a determination of the critical pathway, maximum age group, and sector location of an exposed individual through the inhalation pathway from I 131 , 1 133 , tritium, and particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days to demonstrate compliance with 6.3.1.a .. 3.2 Data, Parameters, and Methodology Annual average X/Q values were calculated, as described in Section 1 of this attachment, for the nearest site boundary in each directional sector and at other critical locations beyond the site boundary. The largestX/Q value was determined to be 9.3E-06 sec/m3 at site boundary for ventilation vent releases at a location 1416 meters SE direction, and 1.2E-06 sec/m3 at site boundary for process vent releases at a location 1513 meters S direction. The maximum doses to total body and skin, and air doses for gamma and beta radiation due to noble gases, would be at these site boundary locations. The doses from both release points are summed in calculations to calculate total maximum dose. -** * *

  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 29 (Page 5 of 8) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 153 OF 156 North Anna Meteorological, Liquid, and Gaseous Pathway .Analysis Step 6.3.1.a.2 dose limits apply specifically to the inhalation pathway. Therefore, the locations and X/Q values determined for maximum rioble gas doses can be used to determine the maximum dose from I 131 , I 133 , tritium, and for all radionuclides in particulate fonp with lives greater than 8 days for the inhalation pathway. The NRC computer code GASPAR, "Evaluation of Atmospheric Releases," Revised 8/19/77, was run using 1979, 1980 and 1981 North Anna Power Station Gaseous Effluent Release
  • Report data. Doses from I 131 , I 133 , tritium, and particulates for the inhalation pathway were calculated using the 9.3E-06 sec/m3 site boundary 'X/Q. Except for the source term data and the 'X/Q value, computer code default parameters were used. Results for each year indicated that the critical age group was the child and the critical organ was the thyroid for the inhalation pathway. The gamma and beta dose factors Kivv, Livv; Mivv, and Nivv in Attachment 13 were obtained by performing a units conversion of the appropriate dose factors from Table B-1, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1, to mrem/yr per Ci/m3 or mrad/yr per Ci/m3, and multiplying by the ventilation vent site boundary 'X/Q value of 9.3E-06 sec/m3. The same approach was used in calculating the gamma and beta dose factors Kipv, Lipv, Mipv, and Nipv in Attachment 13 using .the process vent site boundary 'X/Q value of 1.2E-06 sec/m3. The inhalation pathway dose factors Pivv and Pipv in Attachment 13 were calculated using the following equation:

where: K' = BR = DFAi = 'X/Q = Pi = K'(BR) DFAi (x/Q) (mrem/yr per Curie/sec) (29-1) a constant of unit conversion, 1 E+ 12 pCi/Ci the breathing rate of the child age group, 3700 m3/yr, from Table E-5, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev.I the thyroid organ inhalation dose factor for child age group for the ith radionuclide, in mrem/pCi, from Table E-9, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1 the ventilation vent site boundary X/Q, 9.3E-06 sec/m3, or the process vent site boundary 'X/Q, 1.2E-06 sec/m3, as appropriate. VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 29 (Page 6 of 8) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 154 OF 156 North Anna Meteorological, Liquid, and Gaseous Pathway Analysis Step 6.3.4.a., requires that the dose to the maximum exposed member of the public from I 131 , 1 133 , tritium, and from all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days be less than or equal to the specified limits. Dose calculations were performed for an exposed ~ember of the public within site boundary unrestricted areas, and to an exposed member of the public beyond site boundary at locations identified in the North Anna Power Station Annual Environmental Survey Data for 1981. lt was determined that the member of the public within site boundary would be using Lake Anna for recreational purposes a maximum of 2232 hours per year. It is assumed that this member of the public would be located the entire 2232 hours at the lake shoreline with the largest annual X/Q of l.OE-04 at a location 274 meters NNE sector. The NRC computer code GASP AR was run to calculate the inhalation dose to this individual. The GASP AR results were corrected for the fractional year the member of the public would be using the lake. Using the NRC comput(?r code GASPAR and annual average X/Q and D/Q values obtained as described in Section 1 of this attachment, the member of the public receiving the largest dose beyond site boundary was determined to be located 3250 meters N sector. The critical.pathway was the grass-cow-milk, the maximum age group was the infant, and the critical organ the thyroid. For each year 1979, 1980, and 1981 the dose to the infant from the grass-cow-milk pathway was greater than the dose to the member of the public within site boundary. Therefore, the maximum exposed member of the public was determined to be the infant, exposed through the grass-cow-milk pathway, critical organ thyroid, at a location 3250 meters N sector. Pathway analysis results indicate that existing pathways, including ground and inhalation, within five miles of North Anna Power Station, yield Ri dose factors less than those determined for the cow-milk pathway. Although the cow-milk pathway does not exist within five miles of the Station, ~EG-0133 requires the use of cow-milk Ri dose factors since these values result

  • in the most limiting doses. There is no requirement to include the other pathways.

[Commitment 3.2.3] * * *

  • *
  • VIRGINIA POWER ATTACHMENT 29 (Page 7 of 8) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 155 OF 156 North Anna. Meteorological, Liquid, and Gaseous Pathway Analysis The RMivv and RMipv dose factors, except for tritium, in Attachment 19 were calculated by multiplying the appropriate D/Q value with the following equation:

RM. 1 where: K' = Qp = Uap = Yp = Ys = Fm = r -DFLj= A.i = A.w = tr = th = fp = fs = = K' { i F (r) (DFL.) + -p s e I e-\tr Q (U ) [f f (1 f f ) -A.-tj* . .+ m 1 y y 1 W p S a constant of unit conversion, IE+ 12 pCi/Ci cow's consumption rate, 50, in Kg/day (wet weight) infant milk consumption rate, 330 liters/yr agricultural productivity by unit area of pasture feed grass, 0.7 Kg!m2 agricultural productivity by unit area of stored feed, 2.0, in Kg!m2 (29-2) stable element transfer coefficients, from Table E-1, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1 fraction of deposited activity retained on cow's feed grass, 1.0 for radioiodine, and 0.2 for particulates thyroid ingestion dose factor for the ith radionuclide for the infant, in mrem/pCi, from Table E-14, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1 decay constant for the ith radionuclide, in sec-1, from Table of Isotopes, Lederer,

  • Hollander, and Perlman, sixth Edition. decay constant for removal of activity of leaf and plant surfaces by weathering, 5.73E-07 sec-1 (corresponding to a 14 day half-life) transport time from pasture to cow, to milk, to receptor, l.73E+05, in seconds transport time from pasture, to harvest, to cow, to milk, to receptor, 7.78E+o6, in seconds fraction of year that cow is on pasture, 0.58 (dimensionless), 7 months per year from NUREG-0597 fraction of cow feed that is pasture grass while cow is on pasture, 1.0, dimensionless

' ' ;, Parameters used in the above equation were obtained from NUREG-0133 and Regulatory . . Guide 1.109, Rev .1. VIRGINIA* POWER ATTACHMENT 29 (Page 8 of 8) VPAP-2103 REVISION 6 PAGE 156 OF 156 North Anna Meteorological, Liquid, and Gaseous Pathway Analysis Since the concentration of tritium in milk is based on the airborne concentration rather than the deposition, the following equation is used: (29-3) where: K'" = a constant of unit conversion 1E+03 gm/kg H = absolute humidity of the atmosphere, 8.0, gm/m3 0.75 = the fraction of total feed that is water 0.5 = the ratio of the specific activity of the feed grass to the atmospheric water

  • XIQ = the annual average concentration at a location 3250 meters N sector, 7.2E-07 sec/m3
  • for ventilation vent releases, and 3.9E-07 sec/m3 for the process vent releases Other parameters have been previously defined. * .. -~,.,, .. *
  • *
  • MAJOR CHANGES TO RADIOACTIVE LIQUID, GASEOUS AND SOLID WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS Attachment 4 Page 1 of 1 There were no major changes to Surry's Radioactive Liquid, Gaseous or Solid Waste Treatment Systems during this reporting period .
  • * * . INOPERABILITY OF RADIOACTIVE LIQUID AND GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION Attachment 5 Page 1 ofl There were four effluent monitors, as identified in the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, that were out of service for more than thirty days in 1994. The monitors are: 1. Ol-SW-RM-107C, Component Cooling Service Water Effluent Line Monitor. This monitor was removed from service during the replacement of the 'C' Component Cooling Heat Exchanger per DCP-87-029.
2. Ol-SW-RM-120, Unit #1 Circulating Water Discharge Line Monitor. This monitor . was removed from service per EWR 91-055 for detector and ratemeter replacement.

Compensatory sampling, as required by the ODCM, was performed while the monitor was out of service. 3. 02-SW-RM-220, Unit #2 Circulating Waster Discharge Line Monitor. This monitor was removed from service per EWR-91-055 for detector and ratemeter replacement and refurbishment of the detector well assembly. Compensatory sampling, as required by the ODCM, was performed while the monitor was out of service. 4. Ol-:-GW-RM-130-1, Process Vent Noble Gas Activity Monitor. This monitor was out of service for installation of heat trace on the Process Vent sampling lines per DCP 92-060. Compensatory sampling was not required as the redundant Process Vent Noble Gas Activity Monitor, 01-GW-RM-102, was in service. All of the above monitors were returned to service following completion of the EWR and DCPs .

  • *
  • UNPLANNED RELEASES Attachment 6 Page 1 of 1 There were no unplanned liquid or gaseous releases during this reporting period .
  • I * -LOWER LEVEL OF DETECTION FOR EFFLUENT SAMPLE ANALYSIS GASEOUS: Isotope Regmred LLD Tniical LLD Kr-87 1.00E-04 1. 76E-08 -2.96E-07 Kr-88 1.00E-04 2.27E-08 -3.12E-07 Xe-133 1.00E-04 l.94E-08 -3.29E-07 Xe-133m 1.00E-04 4.72E-08 -8.84E-07 Xe-135 1.00E-04 3.84E-09 -1.22E-07 Xe-135m 1.00E-04 3 .68E-08 -5 .OSE-07 Xe-138 1.00E-12 6.14E-08 -9.76E-07 I-131 1.00E-12 9.32E-14 -2.24E-13 1-133 1.00E-10 1.02E-13 1.32E-13 Sr-89 1.00E-11 5.00E-16 -4.00E-13 Sr-90 1.00E-11 1.00E-16 -8.00E-14 Cs-134 1.00E-11 7.06E-14 -1.65E-13 Cs-137 1.00E-11 6.72E-14 -2.52E-13 Mn-54 1.00E-11 1.02E-13 -1.69E-13 Fe-59 1.00E-11 2.09E-13 -3.91E-13 Co-58 1.00E-11 8.42E-14 -2.llE-13 Co-60 1.00E-11 1.07E-13 -2.99E-13 Zn-65 1.00E-11 1.36E-13 -4.90E-13 Mo-99 1.00E-11 5.75E-13 -1.23E-12 Ce-141 1.00E-11 7.21E-14 -1.56E-13 Ce-144 1.00E-11 2.74E-13 -6.48E-13 Alpha 1.00E-11 1.38E-12 -2.49E-12 Tritium 1.00E-06 5.28E-08 -8.23E-08 LIQUID Sr-89 5.00E-08 2.00E-08 -5.00E-08 Sr-90 5.00E-08 3. OOE-09 -1.00E-08 Cs-134 5.00E-07 l.40E-08 -2.84E-08 Cs-137 5.00E-07 1. 07E-08 -4. lSE-08 1-131 1.00E-06 1.28E-08 -3.18E-08 Co-58 5.00E-07 1.24E-08 -3.47E-08 Co-60 5.00E-07 1.58E-08 -4.SOE-08 Fe-59 5.00E-07 2.62E-08 -6.06E-08 Zn-65 5.00E-07 2.26E-08 -7.59E-08 Mn-54 5.00E-07 1.35E-08 -2.76E-08 Mo-99 5.00E-07 1. OSE-07 -2.06E-07 Ce-141. 5.00E-07 l.74E-08 -3.23E-08 Ce-144 5.00E-07 6.69E-08 -1.36E-07 Fe-55 1.00E-06 4.00E-07 -1.00E-06 Alpha 1.00E-07 7.83E-09 -1.41E-08 Tritium 1.00E-05 1.46E-06 -2.27E-06 Xe-133 1.00E-05 2.84E-08 -8.34E-08 Xe-135 1.00E-05 5.0SE-09 -2.34E-08 Xe-133m 1.00E-05 6.33E-08 -1. 72E-07 Xe-135m 1.00E-05 4.SSE-08 -8.88E-08 Xe-138 1.00E-05 8.16E-08 -1.86E-07 Kr-87 1.00E-05 2.27E-08 -5.36E-08 Kr-88 1.00E-05 3.lOE-08 -6.28E-08 Attachment 7 Page 1 of 1}}
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18151A295&oldid=1500307"