IR 05000331/2010502: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 80: Line 80:
The inspectors reviewed the May 19, 2010, biennial emergency preparedness exercise's objectives and scenario to ensure that the exercise would acceptably test major elements of the licensee's emergency plan and to verify that the exercise's simulated problems provided an acceptable framework to support demonstration of the licensee's capability to implement its plan. The inspectors also reviewed records of other drills and exercises conducted in 2008, 2009, and 2010, to verify that those drills' scenarios were sufficiently different from the scenario used in the May 19, 2010 exercise. The inspectors evaluated the licensee's exercise performance, focusing on the risk significant activities of emergency classification, notification, and protective action decision making, implementation of accident mitigation strategies, and correction of past exercise weaknesses in the following emergency response facilities:  Control Room Simulator (CRS);  Technical Support Center (TSC);  Emergency Operations Facility (EOF); and  Joint Information Center (JIC) The inspectors also assessed the licensee's recognition of abnormal plant conditions, transfer of responsibilities between facilities, internal communications, interfaces with offsite officials, readiness of emergency facilities and related equipment, and overall implementation of the licensee's emergency plan. The inspectors attended post-exercise critiques in the CRS, TSC, EOF, and JIC to evaluate the licensee's initial self-assessment of its exercise performance. The inspectors later met with the licensee's lead exercise evaluators and managers to obtain the licensee's findings and assessments of its exercise participants' performances.
The inspectors reviewed the May 19, 2010, biennial emergency preparedness exercise's objectives and scenario to ensure that the exercise would acceptably test major elements of the licensee's emergency plan and to verify that the exercise's simulated problems provided an acceptable framework to support demonstration of the licensee's capability to implement its plan. The inspectors also reviewed records of other drills and exercises conducted in 2008, 2009, and 2010, to verify that those drills' scenarios were sufficiently different from the scenario used in the May 19, 2010 exercise. The inspectors evaluated the licensee's exercise performance, focusing on the risk significant activities of emergency classification, notification, and protective action decision making, implementation of accident mitigation strategies, and correction of past exercise weaknesses in the following emergency response facilities:  Control Room Simulator (CRS);  Technical Support Center (TSC);  Emergency Operations Facility (EOF); and  Joint Information Center (JIC) The inspectors also assessed the licensee's recognition of abnormal plant conditions, transfer of responsibilities between facilities, internal communications, interfaces with offsite officials, readiness of emergency facilities and related equipment, and overall implementation of the licensee's emergency plan. The inspectors attended post-exercise critiques in the CRS, TSC, EOF, and JIC to evaluate the licensee's initial self-assessment of its exercise performance. The inspectors later met with the licensee's lead exercise evaluators and managers to obtain the licensee's findings and assessments of its exercise participants' performances.


These self-assessments were then compared with the inspectors' independent observations and assessments to assess the licensee's ability to adequately critique its exercise performance. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report. This exercise evaluation inspection constituted one sample as defined in Inspection Procedure (IP)
These self-assessments were then compared with the inspectors' independent observations and assessments to assess the licensee's ability to adequately critique its exercise performance. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report. This exercise evaluation inspection constituted one sample as defined in Inspection Procedure (IP) 71114.01-05.
 
==71114.01 - 05.==


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====

Revision as of 04:46, 14 October 2018

IR 05000331-10-502; FPL Energy Duane Arnold, LLC; on 05/17/2010 - 05/21/2010; Duane Arnold Energy Center; Baseline Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise Inspection
ML101690276
Person / Time
Site: Duane Arnold NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/15/2010
From: Hironori Peterson
Operations Branch III
To: Costanzo C R
NextEra Energy Duane Arnold
References
IR-10-502
Download: ML101690276 (11)


Text

June 15, 2010

Mr. Christopher Vice President NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC 3277 DAEC Road

Palo, IA 52324-9785

SUBJECT: DUANE ARNOLD ENERGY CENTER BASELINE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS BIENNIAL EXERCISE INSPECTION REPORT

5000331/2010502(DRS)

Dear Mr. Costanzo:

On May 21, 2010, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a Baseline Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise inspecti on at your Duane Arnold Energy Center. The enclosed report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on May 21, 2010, with D. Curtland and other members of your staff. The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel. Based on the results of this inspection, no NRC-identified and no self-revealed findings of very low safety significance were identified. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,/RA by Robert Jickling for/

Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-331 License No. DPR-49

Enclosure:

Inspection Report 05000331/2010502

w/Attachment:

Supplemental Information cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III Docket No: 50-331

License No: DPR-49 Report No: 05000331/2010502(DRS) Licensee: FPL Energy Duane Arnold, LLC Facility: Duane Arnold Energy Center Location: Palo, IA Dates: May 17 through 21, 2010 Inspectors: Robert Jickling, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector James McGhee, Senior Resident Inspector Charles Zoia, Operations Engineer

Observers: Robert Kahler, NSIR Branch Chief

Rhex Edwards, Reactor Engineer Approved by: Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch

Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

IR 05000331/2010502; 05/17/2010 - 05/21/2010; Duane Arnold Energy Center; Baseline Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise Inspection. This report covers a one week period of announced baseline inspection by two regional inspectors and one resident inspector. The significance of most findings is indicated by their color (Green, White, Yellow, Red) using Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, "Significance Determination Process" (SDP). Findings for which the SDP does not apply may be Green or be assigned a severity level after NRC management review. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process," Revision 4, dated December 2006.

A. NRC-Identified

and Self-Revealed Findings

Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness

No findings of significance were identified.

B. Licensee-Identified Violations

No violations of significance were identified. 1

REPORT DETAILS

REACTOR SAFETY

Cornerstone:

Emergency Preparedness

1EP1 Exercise Evaluation

.1 Exercise Evaluation

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the May 19, 2010, biennial emergency preparedness exercise's objectives and scenario to ensure that the exercise would acceptably test major elements of the licensee's emergency plan and to verify that the exercise's simulated problems provided an acceptable framework to support demonstration of the licensee's capability to implement its plan. The inspectors also reviewed records of other drills and exercises conducted in 2008, 2009, and 2010, to verify that those drills' scenarios were sufficiently different from the scenario used in the May 19, 2010 exercise. The inspectors evaluated the licensee's exercise performance, focusing on the risk significant activities of emergency classification, notification, and protective action decision making, implementation of accident mitigation strategies, and correction of past exercise weaknesses in the following emergency response facilities: Control Room Simulator (CRS); Technical Support Center (TSC); Emergency Operations Facility (EOF); and Joint Information Center (JIC) The inspectors also assessed the licensee's recognition of abnormal plant conditions, transfer of responsibilities between facilities, internal communications, interfaces with offsite officials, readiness of emergency facilities and related equipment, and overall implementation of the licensee's emergency plan. The inspectors attended post-exercise critiques in the CRS, TSC, EOF, and JIC to evaluate the licensee's initial self-assessment of its exercise performance. The inspectors later met with the licensee's lead exercise evaluators and managers to obtain the licensee's findings and assessments of its exercise participants' performances.

These self-assessments were then compared with the inspectors' independent observations and assessments to assess the licensee's ability to adequately critique its exercise performance. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report. This exercise evaluation inspection constituted one sample as defined in Inspection Procedure (IP) 71114.01-05.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.Enclosure

OTHER ACTIVITIES

4OA1 Performance Indicator (PI) Verification

.1 Drill/Exercise Performance

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Drill/Exercise Performance PI for the period from the first quarter 2009 through first quarter 2010. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Document 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 6, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's records associated with the performance indicator to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance.

Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI; assessments of PI opportunities during pre-designated control room simulator training sessions, and performance during other drills. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this

report. This inspection constituted one drill/exercise performance sample as defined in IP 71151-05.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

.2 Emergency Response Organization Drill Participation

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Drill Participation PI for the period from the first quarter 2009 through first quarter 2010. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 6, were used.

The inspectors reviewed the licensee's records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI; performance during the 2009 and 2010 exercises and drills; and revisions of the roster of personnel assigned to key emergency response organization positions. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection constituted one ERO drill participation sample as defined in IP 71151-05. Enclosure

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

.3 Alert and Notification System

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Alert and Notification System (ANS) PI for the period from the first quarter 2009 through first quarter 2010. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 6, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI and results of periodic scheduled ANS operability tests. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection constituted one alert and notification system sample as defined in IP 71151-05.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

4OA6 Management Meetings

.1 Exit Meeting Summary

On May 21, 2010, the inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. D. Curtland, and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the issues presented.

The inspectors confirmed that none of the potential report input discussed was

considered proprietary. ATTACHMENT:

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee

D. Curtland, Plant Manager
R. Anderson, Business Unit Manager
S. Catron, Licensing Manager
R. Cole, Performance Improvement Manager
B. Eckes, Nuclear Oversight Manager
S. Funk, Radiation Effluents Coordinator
K. Furman, Safety Manager
P. Hansen, NOMS Manager
B. Kindred, Security Manager
K. Kleinheinz, Engineering Director
C. Moser, Technical Training Supervisor
D. Mothena, Corporate Functional Area Emergency Preparedness Manager
B. Murrell, Licensing Engineer Analyst
B. Porter, Radiation Protection/Chemistry Manager
G. Rushworth, Assistant Operations Manager

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

R. Orlikowski, Senior Resident Inspector
R. Baker, Resident Inspector
R. Murray, Resident Inspector

LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED

Opened, Closed, and Discussed

None

LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED

The following is a list of documents reviewed during the inspection.

Inclusion on this list does not imply that the NRC inspectors reviewed the documents in their entirety, but rather, that selected sections of portions of the documents were evaluated as part of the overall inspection effort.
Inclusion of a document on this list does not imply NRC acceptance of the document or any part of it, unless this is stated in the body of the inspection report.

1EP1 Exercise Evaluation

Duane Arnold Energy Center May 19, 2010, Evaluated Exercise Manual;
March 11, 2010
Evaluated Exercise Documents and Records; May 19, 2010 Two-Year Listing of Drill and Exercise CAPs; October 22, 2008 - May 19, 2010
Two Years of Drill and Exercise Scenario Timelines; October 22, 2008 - May 19, 2010
CR 391545; Exercise JIC Provided Outdated Radiation Release Information and State Protective Action Decisions; May 20, 2010
CR 391475; Exercise Slow to Update Release Change Information; May 20, 2010
CR 391377; Exercise GE Threshold Different Than Scenario; May 19, 2010
CR 391367; Exercise Discrepancy on Field Team Information; May19, 2010
CR 391364; Exercise Offsite Protective Actions Different than PARs; May 19, 2010
CR 391357; Exercise Fuel Damage Assessment Procedure Issues; May 19, 2010
CR 391356; Exercise Habitability Challenges in the TSC; May 19, 2010
CR 319344; Exercise TSC Issues with Release Diagnosis; May 19, 2010
CR 391317; Exercise TSC Provided Poor Backup to Control Room; May 19, 2010
CR 391285; Exercise Plant Page Issues for ERO Notification; May 19, 2010
CR 391251; Exercise Field Team Radio Problems in the EOF; May 19, 2010 4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification Monthly Data Elements for NRC ERO Drill Participation; June 2009 - March 2010
Monthly Data Elements for NRC ERO Drill/Exercise Performance;
April 2009 - March 2010
Monthly Data Elements for NRC Alert and Notification System Reliability; April 2009 - March 2010
Monthly Siren Availability Report Records; April 2009 - March 2010

LIST OF ACRONYMS

USED [[]]
ADAMS Agency-wide Documents Access and Management System
ANS Alert and Notification System
CAP Corrective Action Program
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CR Condition Report
CRS Control Room Simulator
DRS Division of Reactor Safety
EOF Emergency Operations Facility
EP Emergency Preparedness
ERO Emergency Response Organization
GE General Emergency
IMC Inspection Manual Chapter
IP Inspection Procedure
JIC Joint Information Center

KI Potassium

Iodide

NEI Nuclear Energy Institute
NRC [[]]
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
OSC Operations Support Center
PAR Protective Action Recommendation
PARS Publicly Available Records
PI Performance Indicator
SDP Significance Determination Process
TI Temporary Instruction

TSC Technical Support Center

Mr. Christopher R. Costanzo Vice President

NextEra Energy Duane Arnold,

LLC 3277

DAEC Road

Palo,

IA 52324-9785
SUBJEC T:
DUANE [[]]
ARNOLD [[]]
ENERGY [[]]
CENTER BASELINE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS BIENNIAL EXERCISE INSPECTION
REPORT 5000331/2010502(
DRS ) Dear Mr. Costanzo: On May 21, 2010, the
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (

NRC) completed a Baseline Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise inspecti

on at your Duane Arnold Energy Center. The enclosed report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on May 21, 2010, with D. Curtland and other members of your staff. The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed

personnel. Based on the results of this inspection, no

NRC -identified and no self-revealed findings of very low safety significance were identified. In accordance with
10 CFR 2.390 of the

NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its

enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the

NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (

PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html

(the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely, /RA by Robert Jickling for/

Hironori Peterson, Chief

Operations Branch

Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-331 License No. DPR-49 Enclosure: Inspection Report 05000331/2010502 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ

DISTRI BUTION
See next page
DOCUME NT NAME: G:\DRS\Work in Progress\DUA 2010
502 DRS [[]]

OL.doc Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Sensitive Non-Sensitive

To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy

OFFICE [[]]
RIII [[]]
RIII [[]]

NAME RJickling:co

HPeterson

DATE 06/15/2010

06/15/2010

OFFICI AL
RECORD [[]]
COPY Letter to Mr. Christopher
R. Costanzo from Mr. Hironori Peterson, dated June 15, 2010.
SUBJEC T:
DUANE [[]]
ARNOLD [[]]
ENERGY [[]]
CENTER BASELINE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS BIENNIAL EXERCISE INSPECTION 05000331/2010502 DISTRIBUTION
Susan Bagley

RidsNrrDorlLpl3-1 Resource

RidsNrrPMDuaneArnold Resource

RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource Cynthia Pederson Steven Orth

Jared Heck

Allan Barker

Carole Ariano Linda Linn

DRPIII [[]]

DRSIII

Patricia Buckley

Tammy Tomczak

ROP reports Resource