Semantic search

Jump to navigation Jump to search
 Issue dateTitleTopic
ML20210E58830 June 1999Comment Supporting Draft Reg Guide DG-1074, Steam Generator Tube Integrity. Northern States Power Endorses Comments Transmitted by NEI LtrBackfit
ML20216C1842 March 1998Comment Opposing Proposed GL Addressing Issue of Yr 2000 Readiness as Published in FR,980129,volume 63,number 19,pp 4498 Notice of Opportunity for Public Comment.Nsp Suggests That Draft Ltr Not Be Issued
ML20199C27227 October 1997Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 73, Proposed Amends to NRC Requirements for Emergency Preparedness & Security
DD-97-18, Director'S Decision DD-97-18 Re 970528 Petition Filed by Prairie Island Indian Community Requesting That USNRC Take Action to Determine That NSP Violated Requirements of 10CFR72.122(i).Request Denied Due to Listed Reasons29 August 1997Director'S Decision DD-97-18 Re 970528 Petition Filed by Prairie Island Indian Community Requesting That USNRC Take Action to Determine That NSP Violated Requirements of 10CFR72.122(i).Request Denied Due to Listed ReasonsFuel cladding
ML20216G28226 August 1997Petition for Rulemaking PRM-72-4 to Suspend for Cause Northern Station Power Co Matl License SNM-2506 Needed to Operate Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation at Prairie Island Nuclear Generating PlantFuel cladding
ML20148Q56423 June 1997Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC Licensed Activities (Effective Immediately).Prohibits Jl Barnhart from Any Involvement in NRC-licensed Activities for Period of 5 Yrs from Date of Order
ML20140E47228 May 1997Petition by Prairie Island Indian Community,Per 10CFR2.206, Requesting That NRC Determine That NSP Violated Requirements of 10CFR72.122(I) by Using License SNM-2506 for ISFSI Prior to Establishing Conditions for Safely Unloading TN-40Earthquake
Fuel cladding
ML20138K1516 May 1997Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to Nuclear Power Plant Security Requirements
ML20148R24524 April 1997Demand for Info Re Jl Barnhart Contract Employee at NSP, Working Under Temporary Unescorted Access Authorization. NRC Needs Info to Determine Whether Enforcement Action Should Be Taken to Ensure Future Compliance W/Requirements
ML20134P62426 November 1996NRC Staff Response to Florence Township Motion for Dismissal & Request for Hearing.Concludes That Motion Should Be Denied for Reasons Set Forth.W/Certificate of Svc
ML20129D47715 October 1996NRC Response to Petition for Leave to Intervene of Minnesota Dept of Public Svc.* Dept Should Be Permitted to Participate as Interested State,If Another Petition Granted. W/Certificate of Svc & Notice of Appearance
ML20117E4059 August 1996Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty RuleFitness for Duty
Backfit
ML20117K0031 May 1996Order,Granting Dismissal of Motions by Nsp,Public Utilities Commission & Environ Quality Board for Protective Orders Per Discovery & Plaintiff Motion for Temporary Injunction
ML20094J04711 October 1995Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR60,72,73 & 75 Re Safeguards for Spent Fuel or High Level RadwasteStolen
ML20086T38620 July 1995Comment Opposing Proposed NRC GL on Testing of safety- Related Logic Circuits
ML20085E5266 June 1995Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to NPP Security Requirements Associated W/Containment Access Control
ML20083K27328 April 1995Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for water-cooled Power Reactors. Urges NRC to Support Rev to NEI 94-01 Which Will Allow Use of Two Reduced Pressure Type a Tests as Prerequisites
ML20077M61830 December 1994Comment Re Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Low Power Operations for Np Reactors.Util Believes That Pr Will Have Higher Impact than Described in Regulatory Analysis,As Pr Will Extend Refueling Outages at All Plants
ML20071H41630 June 1994Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-20-23 Re Reduction of Radioactive Emission from 100 Mrems to 1 Mrem/Yr
ML20059K52026 January 1994Demand for Info to Determine Whether Commission Can Have Reasonable Assurance That Other Burns Employees & Managers Will Carry Out Licensed Activities W/O Discriminating Against Individuals Re Safety Issues
ML20062M40030 December 1993Comment Supporting NUMARC Position on Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Protection Against Malevolent Use of Vehicles at NPPsBackfit
ML20045G09421 April 1993Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50,52 & 100 Re Nuclear Power Plant Instrumentation for Earthquakes.Nothing Exists Between Monitor Recording Time & CAV MethodologyEarthquake
ML20101F6869 June 1992Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR19 & 20 to Extend Implementation Date of Revised 10CFR20
ML20090J95812 March 1992Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Environ Review of Applications to Renew Operating Licenses for Nuclear Plants. Licensee Endorses NUMARC CommentsLicense Renewal
ML20087F72214 January 1992Comments on Draft Reg Guide DG-8005, Assessing External Doses from Airborne Radioactive Matls. Disagrees W/Statement That Airborne Concentration Measurements UnreliableGrab sample
ML20086R74312 December 1991Comment on Draft Reg Guide DG-8006, Control of Access to High & Very High Radiation Areas in Nuclear Power PlantsHigh Radiation Area
ML20011E4867 February 1990Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports EEI-UWASTE/NUMARC Comments to Be Provided to NRC by 900209
ML20248D28328 September 1989Notice of Appearance.* Advises That Author Will Enter Appearance in Proceeding on Behalf of Nrc.W/Certificate of Svc
ML20247Q26626 September 1989Establishment of Aslb.* Board Will Comprise of Mb Margulies, Chairman & Oh Paris & Fj Shon,Members.W/Certificate of Svc. Served on 890926
B13367, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements20 September 1989Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements
ML20248C87513 September 1989Response to Order Modifying Licenses & Order to Show Cause Why Licenses Should Not Be Revoked.* Requests Hearing on Issues,Including Funds for Equipment.Supporting Info EnclSafe Shutdown
Incorporated by reference
Exemption Request
ML20246C71418 August 1989Order to Show Cause Why CPs CPEP-1 & CPEP-2 Should Not Be Revoked & Requiring Licensee to Notify Commission at Least 30 Days Before Taking Possession of Any Classified Equipment
ML20245G0723 August 1989Comment on Draft Reg Guide, Assuring Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors. Recommends That NRC Recommendation on Trust Agreement Wording Be Deleted or NRC Should Grandfather Existing Trusts Such as for Plants
ML20248B6202 August 1989Comments on Draft Reg Guide, Assuring Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors. NRC Should Permit Use of Potential Tax Refund as Source of Decommissioning Funds
ELV-00674, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. 10CFR72.6(c) Should Be Revised to Provide for Storage W/O ISFSI Requirement7 July 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. 10CFR72.6(c) Should Be Revised to Provide for Storage W/O ISFSI Requirement
ELV-00679, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Agrees W/Numarc Comments Provided to NRC on 8906265 July 1989Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Agrees W/Numarc Comments Provided to NRC on 890626
ML20246K4805 July 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components
ML20246D88130 June 1989Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components
ML20245D24816 June 1989Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. NRC Must Consider Provision in Rule to Permit Indiscriminate Storage of Spent Fuel at Reactors
ML20246Q29715 May 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants
ML20245J01914 April 1989Comment Re Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants
ML20244B32410 April 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants
ML20247A2974 April 1989Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants
ML20246M27720 March 1989Decision.* Affirms Board Decision LBP-89-05 Granting CP & OL to Licensee.Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890321
B13113, Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units.... Util Recommends Rule Be Revised to Incorporate Addl Flexibility in Considering Age of Diesel8 March 1989Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units.... Util Recommends Rule Be Revised to Incorporate Addl Flexibility in Considering Age of DieselProbabilistic Risk Assessment
ML20236B4648 March 1989Comments on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units Used as Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. Reg Guide Does Not Provide FlexibilityProbabilistic Risk Assessment
ML20246N9478 March 1989Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9 Re Selection Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units Used as Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power PlantsProbabilistic Risk Assessment
B13136, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule on Maint Will Not Improve Maint in Plants Nor Improve Safety or Reliability of Plants.Proposed Rule Much Too Vague27 February 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule on Maint Will Not Improve Maint in Plants Nor Improve Safety or Reliability of Plants.Proposed Rule Much Too VagueBackfit
ML20235V85427 February 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Committed to Goal of Achieving Improved Reliability & Safety Through Better MaintBackfit
ML20235T35827 February 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Util Endorses Comments Filed by NUMARC & Nuclear Util Backfitting & Reform Group.Rule Fails to Provide Basis for Determining Effective Maint ProgramBackfit