ML22173A140
| ML22173A140 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 02/22/2018 |
| From: | Randy Baker NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | |
| Baker R | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17164A334 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML22173A140 (1) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: 8ra...-d--wood.
Date of Examination: §23/(?
Item Initials Task Description a
b*
c-
- 1.
\\
w
- b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with
) Pr R
Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.
I
' \\
T
- c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
rn T
E
- d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
\\Y
\\
N
- 2.
- a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of fS li7 normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major
~
s transients.
I M
- b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u
mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule
£;Q ~
~
L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at A
least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T
applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
0 To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R
C.
quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in Q ~ ~
Section D.5, "Specific Instructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,'" of ES-301 (including overlap).
- 3.
- a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed 9
w among the safety functions as specified on the form.
A (2) Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form. q I~
L (3)
No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).
K (4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.
T (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H
tasks meets the criteria on the form.
R 0
- b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
~
u (1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.
u ~
G (2) At least one task is new or significantly modified.
H (3)
No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations.
C.
Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of 6f -'ff w applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
- 4.
- a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual (2 &-~
plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
G C,,J, t:7 ?-c-5 E
- b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
N C. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
lt,,J L7 ~~
E R
- d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams.
IQ ~ ~
A 0 ti i~
L
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
- f.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
41/2 v "?6-~
Prin~~inat~
~tit
- a.
Author Enc Steinberg I Cf 16
- b.
Facility Reviewer(*)
Dan Wyatt /'-1..,
u,..... ~
,'I" l~lil C.
NRC Chief Examiner(#)
,<'A.>> t)A I- ~~ I e""
Cl C'\\ ~
~
iLJ0/3'.i{
- d.
NRC Supervisor
~
.-$.Q:°\\";"-o~ l
~
.,,~,~,g
- Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
- The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column *c*; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.