|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20195B4441999-05-26026 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Relocating pressure-temp Curves, Predicted Radiation Induced NDTT Shift Curve & LTOP Limits to FCS Unit 1 RCS pressure-temp Limits Rept ML20205J7671999-03-31031 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Increasing Min Required RCS Flow Rate & Changing SRs for RCS Flow Rate LIC-99-0001, Proposed Tech Specs Relocating Three cycle-specific Parameter Limits from FCS TS to COLR1999-01-29029 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Relocating Three cycle-specific Parameter Limits from FCS TS to COLR ML20151U3871998-09-0404 September 1998 Revised Bases of TS Sections 1.3(8),2.0.1(2),2.1.6,2.3,2.4, 2.13,2.15,3.1 & 3.6 ML20217B8241998-03-18018 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Requirements for Alternate Shutdown Panel & Associated Auxiliary Feedwater Panel ML20217B8611998-03-18018 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 5.2 & 5.11.2,changing Title of Shift Supervisor to Shift Manager ML20217P2041998-03-0303 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising TS 2.6 & Basis by Replacing Refs to TS 3.5(4) W/Refs to TS 5.19 ML20199L8951998-01-30030 January 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Relocation of pressure-temp Curves,Predicted Radiation Induced NDTT Shift Curve & LTOP Limits to FCS Unit 1 RCS PT Limits Rept ML20199L7291998-01-30030 January 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Deleting Section 3.E Re License Term ML20202B0931998-01-30030 January 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 2.5 Re Steam & Feedwater Sys ML20203G4311997-12-11011 December 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Adding New LCO to TS 2.15 Pertaining to Inoperable ESF Logic Subsystem ML20199K1391997-11-21021 November 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 5.19 Re Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program ML20217G4601997-10-0303 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Revising TS Surveillance 3.9, Auxiliary Feedwater Sys, to Clarify What Flow Paths Are Required to Be Tested & Delete Specific Discharge Pressure ML20196J0851997-07-25025 July 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Implementing Option B of 10CFR50,App J & Allowing Frequency of Conducting ILRT & Local Leak Rate Testing to Be Based on Component Performance ML20137Y1801997-04-17017 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Administrative Changes to License DPR-40 ML20137H4941997-03-26026 March 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Addl Restrictions on Operation of MSSVs ML20138L4361997-02-20020 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 5.0 Re Administrative Controls LIC-96-0183, Proposed Tech Specs 5.0 Re Administrative Controls & Table of Contents1996-11-20020 November 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 5.0 Re Administrative Controls & Table of Contents ML20129E5161996-10-24024 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 4.3.2,regarding Reactor Core & Control to Allow Use of Either Zircaloy or ZIRLO Cladding Proposed Additional Reference to Westinghouse Topical Report, WCAP-12610-P-A, Vantage + Fuel Assembly Rept ML20129C2621996-10-22022 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 5.0 Re Administrative Controls & 5.9.5 Re Core Operating Limits Rept LIC-96-0125, Proposed Tech Specs Revising Paragraph 2.B(2) of License to Allow Use of Source Matl as Reactor Fuel.Ts 4.3.2 Revision Would Include Depleted U in Describing Reactor Core1996-08-23023 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Paragraph 2.B(2) of License to Allow Use of Source Matl as Reactor Fuel.Ts 4.3.2 Revision Would Include Depleted U in Describing Reactor Core ML20115G0041996-07-15015 July 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 4.3.2 Re Reactor Core & Control ML20112D3211996-05-31031 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re LCO for Trisodium Phosphate & Increasing Min Required Amount of Trisodium Phosphate Contained in Containment Sump Mesh Baskets ML20117H6981996-05-20020 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Clarifying Surveillance Test Requirements Found in TS 3-1,Tables 3-1,3-2,3-3 & 3-3A ML20117H5931996-05-17017 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating Operability Requirements for Shock Suppressors (Snubbers) to USAR & or Plant Procedures & Incorporating Snubber Exam & Testing Requirements Into TS 3.3 ML20097C3081996-02-0101 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Increase in Initial Nominal U-235 Enrichment Limit of Fuel Assemblies That May Be Stored in Spent Fuel Pool LIC-96-0008, Proposed Tech Specs Placing Sirw Tank Low Level Channels in Bypass Rather than Tripped Condition1996-01-22022 January 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Placing Sirw Tank Low Level Channels in Bypass Rather than Tripped Condition ML20094N8631995-11-16016 November 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Adding LCO & Surveillance Test for Safety Related Inverters & Deleting Nonsafety Related Instrument Buses ML20092G0771995-09-0606 September 1995 Proposed Tech Spec 2.7,extending Allowed Outage Time from 7 Days Per Month to 7 Days W/ Addl Once Per Cycle 10 Day Allowed Outage Time ML20087E0281995-08-0404 August 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reducing Minimum Operable Containment Radiation High Signal Channels ML20086D5341995-06-27027 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Reformation & Clarification of TS Re Chemical & Vol Control Sys ML20091G3601995-06-26026 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Extension of Allowed Outage Time for an Inoperable Low Pressure SI Pump ML20086D3851995-06-26026 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Audit Frequencies for Plant QA Program ML20084G7751995-05-31031 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Requesting Amend to Provide Addl Restrictions on Operation of CCW Sys Heat Exchangers ML20083C0091995-05-0808 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating Proposed Revs Per GL 93-05 to Specs 2.3,3.1,3.2,3.3 & 3.6 ML20087G9691995-04-0707 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Relocation of Axial Power Distribution Figure for License DPR-40 ML20082J0851995-04-0707 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Administrative Changes to License DPR-40 ML20080S0291995-03-0101 March 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Administrative Revs to TS 5.5 & 5.8,per GL 93-07 & Revs Unrelated to GL 93-07 to TS 2.5, 2.8,2.11,3.2 & 3.10 ML20078P8251995-02-10010 February 1995 Proposed Tech Specs 2.10 to Relocate Requirements for Incore Instrumentation Sys ML20077S1691995-01-0909 January 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Deletion of Requirements for Toxic Gas Monitoring Sys ML20078G8981994-11-11011 November 1994 Proposed Tech Specs 5.2 & 5.5,reflecting Administrative Changes ML20024J3921994-10-0707 October 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting SRs in TS 3.6(3)a for Eight Raw Water Backup Valves to Containment Cooling Coils,Deleting SRs in TS 3.2,Table 3-5,item 6 for 58 Raw Water Valves & Revising Basis of TS 2.4 to Reflect Changes ML20069H9261994-06-0606 June 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Changes to Credit Leak Before Break Methodology to Resolve USI A-2, Asymmetrical Blowdown Loads on Rcps ML20069D8451994-05-25025 May 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Requesting one-time Schedular Exemption from 10CFR50.36a(2) ML20062N4211993-12-28028 December 1993 Proposed TS Tables 3-1 & 3-2 Re Min Frequencies for Checks, Calibrs & Testing of RPS & Min Frequencies for Checks, Calibrs & Testing of ESFs & Instrumentation & Controls, Respectively LIC-93-0228, Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Changes to Leak Before Break Methodology to Resolve Unresolved Safety Issue A-2, Asymmetrical Blowdown Loads on Reactor Primary Coolant Sys1993-08-20020 August 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Changes to Leak Before Break Methodology to Resolve Unresolved Safety Issue A-2, Asymmetrical Blowdown Loads on Reactor Primary Coolant Sys ML20045H1791993-07-12012 July 1993 Proposed TS 2.14,Table 2-1,Item 6.b Re ESF Sys Initiation, Degraded Voltage Setting Limits LIC-93-0159, Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Administrative Changes1993-06-17017 June 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Administrative Changes ML20128E5341993-02-0808 February 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Deleting Section 5.9.4 Re Radioactive Effluent Release Rept.Draft Chemistry Manual Procedure Encl ML20128C0461993-02-0101 February 1993 Proposed TS Figures 2-1A & 2-1B Re pressure-temp Limits for Heatup & Cooldown,Respectively 1999-05-26
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20195B4441999-05-26026 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Relocating pressure-temp Curves, Predicted Radiation Induced NDTT Shift Curve & LTOP Limits to FCS Unit 1 RCS pressure-temp Limits Rept ML20205J7671999-03-31031 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Increasing Min Required RCS Flow Rate & Changing SRs for RCS Flow Rate LIC-99-0001, Proposed Tech Specs Relocating Three cycle-specific Parameter Limits from FCS TS to COLR1999-01-29029 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Relocating Three cycle-specific Parameter Limits from FCS TS to COLR LIC-98-0141, SG Eddy Current Test Rept for 1998 Refueling Outage. with1998-10-27027 October 1998 SG Eddy Current Test Rept for 1998 Refueling Outage. with ML20151U3871998-09-0404 September 1998 Revised Bases of TS Sections 1.3(8),2.0.1(2),2.1.6,2.3,2.4, 2.13,2.15,3.1 & 3.6 ML20217B8611998-03-18018 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 5.2 & 5.11.2,changing Title of Shift Supervisor to Shift Manager ML20217B8241998-03-18018 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Requirements for Alternate Shutdown Panel & Associated Auxiliary Feedwater Panel ML20217P2041998-03-0303 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising TS 2.6 & Basis by Replacing Refs to TS 3.5(4) W/Refs to TS 5.19 ML20199L7291998-01-30030 January 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Deleting Section 3.E Re License Term ML20199L8951998-01-30030 January 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Relocation of pressure-temp Curves,Predicted Radiation Induced NDTT Shift Curve & LTOP Limits to FCS Unit 1 RCS PT Limits Rept ML20202B0931998-01-30030 January 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 2.5 Re Steam & Feedwater Sys ML20203G4311997-12-11011 December 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Adding New LCO to TS 2.15 Pertaining to Inoperable ESF Logic Subsystem ML20199K1391997-11-21021 November 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 5.19 Re Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program ML20217G4601997-10-0303 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Revising TS Surveillance 3.9, Auxiliary Feedwater Sys, to Clarify What Flow Paths Are Required to Be Tested & Delete Specific Discharge Pressure ML20211N7591997-10-0202 October 1997 Rev 0 to Fort Calhoun Station Unit 1 Operating Instruction, OI-ES-3, Engineered Safeguard Controls Normal Mode 1,2 & 3 Alignment Check ML20211N7521997-09-21021 September 1997 Rev 2 to Fort Calhoun Operations Dept Policy & Directive OPD-6-04, Annunciator Marking ML20211N7471997-09-12012 September 1997 Rev 2 to Fort Calhoun Operations Dept Policy & Directive OPD-6-08, Plastic Label Usage ML20211N7661997-08-25025 August 1997 Rev 4 to Fort Calhoun Station Unit 1 Annunciator Response Procedure ARP-1, APR-1 Annunciator Response Procedure ML20211N7411997-08-24024 August 1997 Rev 0 to Fort Calhoun Operations Dept Policy & Directive OPD-5-14, Test Monitor Program ML20196J0851997-07-25025 July 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Implementing Option B of 10CFR50,App J & Allowing Frequency of Conducting ILRT & Local Leak Rate Testing to Be Based on Component Performance ML20137Y1801997-04-17017 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Administrative Changes to License DPR-40 ML20137H4941997-03-26026 March 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Addl Restrictions on Operation of MSSVs ML20138L4361997-02-20020 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 5.0 Re Administrative Controls ML20134J6841997-01-20020 January 1997 Rev 5,Change a to Security Training & Qualification Program LIC-96-0183, Proposed Tech Specs 5.0 Re Administrative Controls & Table of Contents1996-11-20020 November 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 5.0 Re Administrative Controls & Table of Contents ML20129E5161996-10-24024 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 4.3.2,regarding Reactor Core & Control to Allow Use of Either Zircaloy or ZIRLO Cladding Proposed Additional Reference to Westinghouse Topical Report, WCAP-12610-P-A, Vantage + Fuel Assembly Rept ML20129C2621996-10-22022 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 5.0 Re Administrative Controls & 5.9.5 Re Core Operating Limits Rept LIC-96-0125, Proposed Tech Specs Revising Paragraph 2.B(2) of License to Allow Use of Source Matl as Reactor Fuel.Ts 4.3.2 Revision Would Include Depleted U in Describing Reactor Core1996-08-23023 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Paragraph 2.B(2) of License to Allow Use of Source Matl as Reactor Fuel.Ts 4.3.2 Revision Would Include Depleted U in Describing Reactor Core ML20115G0041996-07-15015 July 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 4.3.2 Re Reactor Core & Control ML20112D3211996-05-31031 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re LCO for Trisodium Phosphate & Increasing Min Required Amount of Trisodium Phosphate Contained in Containment Sump Mesh Baskets ML20117H6981996-05-20020 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Clarifying Surveillance Test Requirements Found in TS 3-1,Tables 3-1,3-2,3-3 & 3-3A ML20117H5931996-05-17017 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating Operability Requirements for Shock Suppressors (Snubbers) to USAR & or Plant Procedures & Incorporating Snubber Exam & Testing Requirements Into TS 3.3 ML20129C5351996-03-0101 March 1996 Rev 0 to Incore Instrumentation Operability Requirements ML20097C3081996-02-0101 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Increase in Initial Nominal U-235 Enrichment Limit of Fuel Assemblies That May Be Stored in Spent Fuel Pool LIC-96-0008, Proposed Tech Specs Placing Sirw Tank Low Level Channels in Bypass Rather than Tripped Condition1996-01-22022 January 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Placing Sirw Tank Low Level Channels in Bypass Rather than Tripped Condition ML20108A7161995-12-19019 December 1995 Rev 7 to CH-ODCM-0001, ODCM, Incorporating TS Amend 171 for Section 3.1 Update/Reflect Changing Environ ML20094N8631995-11-16016 November 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Adding LCO & Surveillance Test for Safety Related Inverters & Deleting Nonsafety Related Instrument Buses ML20092G0771995-09-0606 September 1995 Proposed Tech Spec 2.7,extending Allowed Outage Time from 7 Days Per Month to 7 Days W/ Addl Once Per Cycle 10 Day Allowed Outage Time ML20091P4011995-09-0101 September 1995 Rev 3 to Fort Calhoun Station ISI Program Plan Third Ten-Yr Interval 1993-2003 ML20087E0281995-08-0404 August 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reducing Minimum Operable Containment Radiation High Signal Channels ML20086D5341995-06-27027 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Reformation & Clarification of TS Re Chemical & Vol Control Sys ML20091G3601995-06-26026 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Extension of Allowed Outage Time for an Inoperable Low Pressure SI Pump ML20086D3851995-06-26026 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Audit Frequencies for Plant QA Program ML20085M0081995-06-15015 June 1995 Rev 2 to ISI Program Plan for 1993-2003 Interval ML20084G7751995-05-31031 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Requesting Amend to Provide Addl Restrictions on Operation of CCW Sys Heat Exchangers ML20083C0091995-05-0808 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating Proposed Revs Per GL 93-05 to Specs 2.3,3.1,3.2,3.3 & 3.6 ML20087G9691995-04-0707 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Relocation of Axial Power Distribution Figure for License DPR-40 ML20082J0851995-04-0707 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Administrative Changes to License DPR-40 ML20108A7121995-03-15015 March 1995 Rev 6 to CH-ODCM-0001, ODCM, Incorporating New TS Amend 164 ML20080S0291995-03-0101 March 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Administrative Revs to TS 5.5 & 5.8,per GL 93-07 & Revs Unrelated to GL 93-07 to TS 2.5, 2.8,2.11,3.2 & 3.10 1999-05-26
[Table view] |
Text
_ __
y 5-O b
dV c,
,) 4
/
d'h 2 .0 LIMITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION 2.15 Instrumentation and control systems (Continued)
- 2 {w nE N E h 'd g -
ventilation isolation signals available if the containment ventila-W d <
y tion isolation valves are closed. If after 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> from time of
{,.f } h. -, 3 t/)s g features I (, initiating a hot shutdown procedure the inoperable engineered safety G
- 3 q jf ddL o or isolation functions channel has not been stored to m -) U y L,2 operable status, the reactor shall be placed in a cold shutdown 0 , c. A' #d a condition within the following 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. This specification applies
d d j ] g),c -r-jj N S .5gto the high rate trip-wide W
O
^
above 10 range log channel when the plant is at or power and is operating below 15% of rated power.
,0 In the event the number of channels of a particular system in service d
3 o._ -)g? ?d h,
'q -Q falls below the limits given in the columns entitled " Minimum Operable
_.y j Channels" or "tiinimum Degree of Redundancy", except as conditioned by 0- d' -
the column entitled " Permissible Bypass Conditions", the reactor shall y j~E be placed in a hot shutdown coi.dition within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />; however, oper
)dC[h - d yO cp5 C.- tion can continue without containment ventilation isolation signals e, 6 available if the vei.tilation isolation valves are closed. If minimum c # .J L 'If . t ,.g E
).
.4 conditions for engineered safety features or isolation functiens are j dy e jf 2 o &
0 v 4 ,g not met within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> from time of discovering loss of operability.
gV 2 5 #* the reactor shall be placed in a cold shutdown condition within the Al. ie id 7 5' following 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. If the number of operable high rate trip-wide W h d 'thGV O O rang '-'
log channels falls below that given in the column entitlel 0 " Minimum 0 g t power and at or below 15% of rated power, reactor critical o q P 4' E g 3j above 10 be gperable Channels" ininTable 2-2 an operation shalt discontinued and the piant piaced an operational
-f- g -
mode allowing repair of the inoperable channels before startup or j f $ d d v ['v
-~~
,,,d, ,, reactor critical operation may proceed.
~T g l --t'0 f d "3 o 0- CEA d
If, during power operation, position the rod block indication function and system of the secondary rod block ci y g g 9 8 g -F 0 4 00 g.pf, Ndeviation 0
- f r mrealann thanand 24 the hours, of f dWg CEAor the plantfunction sequencing computer more than 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br />, the CEAs shall be' withdrawn and maintained at PDIL alarm are inoperable fo
~'$ ' j ; fully withdrawn and the control rod drive system mode switch shall jh{J pdgd 4g g ] {~~~~be roupmaintained in the off position except when manual motion of CEA 4 is required to control axial power distribution.
-r -v to y d e S m 4 Basis CC'h During plant operation, the complete instrumentation systems will normally be in service. P.eactor safety is provided by the reactor protection
.- system, which automatically initiates appropriate action to prevent exceed-
$., ing established limits. Safety is not compromised, however, by continuing
\ ,
operation with certain instrumental'on channels out of service since provisions were made for this in the plant design. This specification f outlines limiting conditions for operation necessary to preserve the I effectiveness of the reactor control and protection system when any one or more of the channels are out of service.
All reactor protection and almost all engineered safety feature channels are supplied with sufficient redundancy to provide the capability for channel test at power, except for backup channels such as derived Circuits in engineered safeguards control system. ,
1 8908040224 890731 l PDR ADOCK 05000265 2-66 Amendment No. B, 20. N , 65,gg l P PDC.
_ . - . - _ . _ . ,%w
... -Q -
-4 EN 4s 46M'u }
N9 k y[\ 2.g 2.0 LIMITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION 2.15 Instrumentation and control Systems (Continued) bg O y Basis (Continued) b5
~~d When one of the four channels is taken out of service for maintenance, the s W protective system logic can be c5anged to a two-out-of-three coincidence k'%y'y"Ihg
.s
'J for a reactor trip by bypassing the removed channel. If the bypass is not Q D effected, the out-of-service channel (Power Removed) assumes a tripped R
g% 'g [q O {G q s
condition (except hi h(rqte-of-change of power, high power level and high pressurizer pressure , le which results in a one-out-of-three channel logic.
30 If in the 2 of 4 logic system of the reactor protective system one channel f 9D Q+K-R is bypassed and a second channel manually placed in a tripped condition, the reniting logic is 1 of 2. At rated power, the minimum operable high-
^
newer level channel is 3 in order to provide adequate power tilt detection.
If only 2 channels are operable, the reactor power level is reduced to b Q(h[D N
Q k q . ,,
70% rated power which protects the reactor from possibly exceeding design pei. king factors due to undetected flux tilts and from exceeding droppea CEA peakinEf actors.
{ {T All engineered safety features are initiated by 2-out-of-4 logic matrices except containment high radiation which operates on a 1-out-of-5 basis.
q NN The engineered safety features system provides a 2 of 4 logic on the signals y S -( 8 '
used to actuate the equipment connected to each of the two emergency diesel k generator units.
kd '
9*~ N, The rod block system automatically inhibits all CEA motion in the event a Limiting Condition for Operation (* CO) on CEA insertion, CEA deviation, CEA
$%k G overlap or CEA sequencing is approact ed. The installation of the rod block h
D .S 4
'1 e system ensures that no single fai~ -e in the control element drive control R g system (other than a dropped CEA) can cause the CEAs to move such that the
- g y ~g 9 CEA insertion, deviation, sequencing or overlap limits are exceeded.
D'N q Accordingly, with the rod block system installed, only the dropped CEA dd, L s event is considered an A00 and factored into the derivation of the Limiting I Safety Syst~i Settings and Limiting Conditions for Operation. With the d k9 'qk rod block function out-of-service several additional CEA deviation events Q b[U O
C g) must be considered as A00s. Analysis of these incidents indicates that the single CEA withdrawal incident is the most limiting of these events. An N%I b8 analysis of the at-power single CEA withdrawal incident was performed for
{
i I k D g) ' Fort Calhoun for various initial Group 4 insertions, and it has been '
l l~
[Q4 I concluded that the Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCO) and Limiting Safety System Settings (LSSS) are valid for a Group 4 insertion of less than or equal to 15%. )
](
L y References (1) FSAR, Section 7.2.7.1 f
)
3 2-66a Amendment No, j!, 20, 25, 32, f3,88 1
l
,g-. __
= _ :; - - - =- - ,; ^
~ ~= = m
?. 0 SURVEILLANCE RE00fEEMENTS 3.1 ' Instrumentation and Control Applicability Applies to the reactor protective system and other critical instru-mentation and controls.
Objective To specify the minimum frequency and type of surveillance to be applied to critical plant instrumentation and ccatrols, Specifications Calibration, testing and checking of instrument channels, reactor protective system and engineered safeguards system logic channels and miscellaneous-instrument systems and controls shall be performed as specified in Tables 3-1 to 3-3ct.
Basis Failures such as blown instrument fuses, defective indicators, and faulted amplifiers which result in " upscale" or "downscale" indica-tion can be easily recognized by simple observation of the functioning of an instrument or system. Furthermore, such failures are, in many cases, revealed by alarm or annunciator action and a check supple-ments this type of built-in surveillance.
Based on the District's experience in operation of conventional power plants and on reported nuclear plant experience, a checking frequency of once-per-shift is deemed adequate for reactor and steam system instrumentation. Calibrations are performed to i ensure the presentation and acquisition of accurate information.
The power range safety channels are calibrated daily against a calorimetric balance standard.to acccunt for errors induced by changing rod patterns and core physics parameters.
Other channels, subject only to the " drift" errors, can be expected I to remain within acceptable tolerances if recalibration is performed at each refueling shutdown interval.
l l
3-1 Amendment No. 9,122
, yq -e _ wM e*.r '~
L .-
1 l
E
= !. l a e = me on. a g a mg 25E e b5
- E W s MC
=
" % a san e w= =
a .== = =
m . =m = = E=
W s
. z. . ,,
3*x U a 5ws a aa s*E m3 - Mm
, a= sE s*E -a ge E =E=
E m
A E
E 8!
E i
8e Im3 m s5 ge= g-Eme mm E .E
=.
a E=
==
==- e,a
-l=
=
E5w E ==, a g a e
E es am.
a y
da <s E"gg
- -Ba e ~mE mg U 5 mg eus -
se E ~**
am e B *5 d " " "
o sg gi gg. -ogggggsallE="Eglag*8ll,==gtc
- a g3 , . gg n
.s Em E
n g
n.
n E Y
m <
E g e e a e m E 5 m u Is E au E
-a E e a E
m -
kW E
- R E d E EE dE E E $ E 4 ; 4 ; ; ; ; ; 4 ; a E!
- N g-me-c 5
ir
"" ga 5
=
m
m-me EE we mg g gm E-s s
!!= EmEm
=n a
na a
EE gE GB
ATTACHMENT B l
t
Discussion, Justification and No Significant ;
Hazards Consideration '
Description of Amendment _ Request to provide the Limiting Conditions for j Operation and Surveillance Requirements for the Alternate Shutdown Panel.
The proposed Technical Specification changes shown on page 2-66,2-66a and 3-1 of the Technical . Specifications provide the operability requirements and basis of these requirements for the Alternato Shutdown Panel (ASP).
The ' addition of Table 3-3a provides the Surveillance Requirements for the ASP.
As requested by Reference 2, and committed to in Reference 3, this Facility License Change (FLC) revises the Technical Specifications to x
N provide surveillance and operability requirements that an appropriate for i a Protective or Safeguards System as applied to the Alternate Shutdown
. Panel (ASP).
n No Significant Hazards Consideration This proposed amendment does not involve significant hazards based on the following.information:
- 1. Will the change involve a significant increase in the probability or consequence of an accident previously evaluated?
Answer No. This Change decreases the consequences and probability of
' accident / event escalation during the forced evacuation of the Control Room. Since the ASP assumes a major protective function for plant control during the loss of the: Control Room in a fire, this FLC is required to ensure the ASP'S continued operability.
- 2. Will the change create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated?
Answer
- No. . It has been determined that a new or different type of accident 'is not created because no new or different-modes of operation are proposed for the plant. Additional surveillance provide a higher level of assurance that the ASP will function if required to do so.
- 3. Will the change involve a significant reduction in the margin of safety?- { .
Answer No. This change results in an increase in the margin of safety associated with the ASP and the Alternate Shutdown capability by assuring that the system will operate properly through !
surveillance tests, and applying Limiting Conditions for Operation to th's system. i
- y. ATTACHMET B
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ -