ML20153C464

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Opposes Opening of Plant Because of Consequences If Accident Occurs.Recommends That Plant Be Converted for Other Energy Use.License Should Be Revoked
ML20153C464
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 10/27/1981
From: Townsend B, Townsend J, Townsend W
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To: Bradford P
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20151Y970 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-87-444 NUDOCS 8805060235
Download: ML20153C464 (1)


Text

l

. 4

  • a a Q' .)

, October 27,1981 1759 Marco Pl.

Camarillo, Ca. <

l 93010

, Dear Peter Bradford; j i do not want to take up alot of your time. Please do read and consider our view on the nuclear plant called Diablo(Devil).

My family lives close enough to it, that should something tragic

[ occur, vind conditions could carry contamination over us within i

! hours. There could be no evacuation of highly populated Ventura  ;

!, and Los Angeles Counties in the required time.  ;

I don't believe that if P G & E were to be given the opport- )

unity afresh, vould put a nuclear plant at that location. I also

' eel that since it has not been contaminated with activated fuel, the plant could be converted to another energy source. Expensiver' fes,but what was the cost involved in Three Mile Island? Health- I wise, we may not know for 15 to 20 years. Money cannot - should '

I not.be a factor when the Nx0 weighs the safety of that plant towards those effected,this generation or farther down the line, he urge you to revoke the license given P,G& E for Diablo.The earthquake fault and easy access to terrorists via the coast make a very poor risk. This holds true especially to those of us that are dovn- vind.Thanks for your attention.

l 3incerely; Judy and Bill Townsend also William Mike Sherie and Jason Tov.ms end W:_-k

& !)

esboo)833?**^ha mm, -

-