IR 05000416/1997011
| ML20141E447 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Grand Gulf  |
| Issue date: | 06/25/1997 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20141E428 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-416-97-11, NUDOCS 9707010062 | |
| Download: ML20141E447 (3) | |
Text
-
.__
..
.
._.-
t
.,
'
,
I e
i ENCLOSURE a
i U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION IV
l Docket No.:
50-416 License No.:
NPF-29 Report No.:
50-416/97-11
Licensee:
Entergy Operations, Inc.
'
Facility:
Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Location:
Waterloo Road Port Gibson, Mississippi
.
Dates:
June 2-6,1997
,
i Inspector:
Thomas W. Dexter, Senior Physical Security Specialist Plant Support Branch Approved By:
Blaine Murray, Chief, Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety
'
'
ATTACHMENT:
Supplemental Information
"
i DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE lS DECONTROLLED
~'
9707010062 970625 PDR ADOCK 05000416 G
.
__
_
_____
_
_
-
..
.
-
2-EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Grand Gulf Nuclear Station '
NRC Inspection Report 50-416/97-11 This was an announced inspection of the licensee's physical security program. The areas inspected included records and reports, testing and maintenance, assessment aids, vital area barriers and detection aids, alarm stations, communications, access control of personnel and vehicles, personnel training and qualification, management support, and security program audit.
Plant Suonort A vgry good records and reports program was in place. The security staff was
mair,taining records as required by the security plan (Section S1.1).
i A very good testing and maintenance program was being conducted and was
properly documented. Timely repair of security equipment resulted ir a low number of compensatory posting hours for security officers (Section S2.1).
Assessment aids provided good assessment of the perimeter detection zones.
- Instrumentation and controls technicians provided very good service support and routinely repaired problems with closed-circuit television cameras in a timely manner (Section S2.2).
i.
Effective vital area barriers and detection syrsem that would provide adequate delay
and detection to individuals attempting unauthorized entry were in place.
.
Additionally, the vital area barriers and detection system effectively limited access l
to only authorized personnel (Section S2.3).
The alarm stations were redundant and well protected. The operators were alert
and well trained (Section S2.4).
A very good security radio communication system was maintained. An adequate
number of portable radios was available for members of the security organization (Section S2.5).
,
A very good program for searching personnel and vehicles was maintained.
- Personnel were knowledgeable of their duties and responsibilities (Section S4.1).
DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS S AFEGUARDS INFORM ATION UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE lS DECONTROLLED l
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
_
--
- - - - -
l
3-
.
A concern was identified involving the lack of proficiency when iron sights were
used during firearm demonstrations. Medical exarninations for security officers l
were thorough and well documented (Section SS.1).
Senior management support for the security organization was effective. The
security program was implemented by a well trained and highly qualified staff (Section S6.1).
The 1996 audits of the security program were performance based and well
documented (Section S7.1).
,
,
<
t DOCUMENT CONTAINS
ENCLOSURE CONTAINS S AFEGUARDS INFORMATION S AFEGUARDS INFORMATION UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE IS DECONTROLLED
,
?-
E