|
---|
Category:INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL MEMORANDUM
MONTHYEARML20207L5671999-03-12012 March 1999 Forwards Facility Submitted Outline,Initial Exam Submittal & as Given Operating Exam for Test Administered on 981130,1204-14 & 18 ML20207E6091999-03-0303 March 1999 Forwards NRC Approved Operator Licensing Exam (Facility Outline & Initial Exam Submittal & as-given Operating Exam) for Tests Administered on 980622-26 ML20236Y6301998-08-0808 August 1998 Forwards Monthly Rept Reflecting Status of 10CFR2.206 Petitions as of 980731.Petitions on Plant GT97494 & GT97339 for Which DD Became Final Actions During Month Were Closed. Portion of Encl Withheld ML20237A0011998-08-0707 August 1998 Informs That Extension Granted on Envirocare Decision of 980904.Two Week Extension on Philadelphia VA Decision of 980828 Requested.Submits Concurrence of Changes.Rept on 2.206 July Status for Plants Encl ML20248L8621998-06-0909 June 1998 Forwards May 1998 Rept on Status of Public Petitioners Under 10CFR2.206.Petition on Seabrook (GT970873) for Which DD 98- 03 Became Final Agency Decision on 980413 Closed.Attachment 3 Withheld ML20203M6681998-02-23023 February 1998 Forwards SER Re TR CENPD-199-P,Rev 1-P-A,Suppl 2-P, CE Setpoint Methodology Proposing CRGR Review Be Waived IAW Suggested Procedures in 890929 Memo IA-97-461, Forwards FOIA Request Received Direct in Region II from E Barton on 971125.Encl Partially Deleted1997-11-25025 November 1997 Forwards FOIA Request Received Direct in Region II from E Barton on 971125.Encl Partially Deleted ML20202E0141997-11-25025 November 1997 Forwards FOIA Request Received Direct in Region II from E Barton on 971125.Encl Partially Deleted IA-99-106, Discusses Concern Identified During Special Design Architect-Engineer Insp Re EQ of Unit 1 Terry Turbine Woodward Governor Controls for Steam Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump1997-08-15015 August 1997 Discusses Concern Identified During Special Design Architect-Engineer Insp Re EQ of Unit 1 Terry Turbine Woodward Governor Controls for Steam Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump ML20205D4281997-08-15015 August 1997 Discusses Concern Identified During Special Design Architect-Engineer Insp Re EQ of Unit 1 Terry Turbine Woodward Governor Controls for Steam Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump ML20205M3331997-07-28028 July 1997 Provides Final Agenda for Region II Enforcement Meeting to Be Held on 970730.OI Attendance Requested for Issue Involving Termination of Turkey Point Radwaste Operator Who Failed to Follow Procedure IR 05000335/19970051997-07-17017 July 1997 Forwards Allegation Evaluation Rept & NRC Insp Repts 50-335/97-05 & 50-389/97-05 Re RII-97-A-0116 ML20202E0261997-04-23023 April 1997 Discusses Technical Staff Actions Associated W/Three Concerns in Allegation RII-96-A-0251 ML20137L2971997-03-31031 March 1997 Forwards Matrix Containing Answer to Listed Questions in ,Rev 1 ML20148A7131997-03-28028 March 1997 Forwards Addl Responses Needed to Grant Exemptions.Items 2,5,6 & 7 Seem Appropriate for St Lucie to Respond to ML20137R8831997-03-27027 March 1997 Provides Info Requested by 960208 Memo from J Stolz Re Review of Spent Fuel Pool Practices & Current Licensing Basis ML20137L0981997-03-25025 March 1997 Forwards Summary of Changes Made to Safeguards Review Rept, Rev 37 to St Lucie Physical Security Plan,Case Control Number N5S63VA50033593.W/o Encl ML20137L2311997-03-25025 March 1997 Forwards Summary of Changes Made to Safeguards Review Rept, Rev 47 to St Lucie Physical Security Plan,Case Control Number N5S76VA50033596.W/o Encl ML20136E9261997-03-0606 March 1997 Forwards SALP Input Feeder Info at St Lucie Facility from 940102-960106 & Requests That Technical Staff Complete Review by 951222 ML20136A9241997-02-28028 February 1997 Partially Withheld Memo Discussing drop-in Visit of J Broadhead,Chairman & CEO FPL Group & Chairman & CEO FP&L Co & J Goldberg ML20137L2751996-12-16016 December 1996 Requests Guidance in Addressing Issues Re Use of Temporary Fire Pump W/O Evaluation & Construction of Enclosure for Control Rod Drive Electronic Equipment within Cable Spreading Room,W/O Appropriate Evaluation ML20136A6751996-12-0909 December 1996 Partially Withheld Memo Discussing Directors Decision 96-19 Under 10CFR2.206 Re Steam Generator Issued at St Lucie ML20137R5381996-11-22022 November 1996 Informs That Rept IR 94-008 for St Lucie Opens Item 94-008-02-URI Quality Level of PORV & SRV Discharge Piping ML20136E6221996-11-19019 November 1996 Informs That Draft in on Operator Activities Affecting Reactivity Being Distributed ML20136E6991996-11-19019 November 1996 Requests Info Re Sheron St Lucie Visit.Info Requested by 961120 ML20136E6791996-11-18018 November 1996 Forwards Background Info on St Lucie Nuclear Instrumentation Insp ML20136E6881996-11-18018 November 1996 Forwards Background Info on St Lucie Nuclear Instumentation Insp ML20136E6081996-11-15015 November 1996 Provides List of Corrective Actions That Have Been Rolled Into Speakout Program ML20136E5461996-11-14014 November 1996 Forwards File Submitted to Kerry on 961024 Re PIM-like Summary of Events from 92-93 ML20136E4911996-11-13013 November 1996 Forwards Updated Schedule for St Lucie FY1 ML20140E5361996-11-12012 November 1996 Forwards Plant EA Worksheet ML20140E6591996-11-12012 November 1996 Provides Revs of Plant Violations for Current Hour ML20138G4131996-11-12012 November 1996 Requests Technical assistance,TIA-019,re Discrepancies Between Containment Radiation Monitoring Sys Described in Usfar & Regulatory Guide 1.45 at Plants ML20140E5301996-11-0808 November 1996 Forwards Input Received from Dan & Revised EA Worksheet from Incorporating Input.Few Slight Revs Were Made to Notice of Violation ML20140E6201996-11-0707 November 1996 Provides Two Violations That Are Subjects of EA Worksheet ML20140E6521996-11-0707 November 1996 Informs That D Barss Will Be e-mailing Input on Items 5 & 6 for Incorporation Into EA Worksheet ML20137R9031996-11-0606 November 1996 Requests That Info Re St Lucie Be Mailed to Author.Info May Be Found in Plan of Day Handout,Provided by Residents ML20140E5941996-11-0606 November 1996 Informs That Plant Violations 1 & 2 Re Emergency Prepardness Program Insp,Being Looked at for Escalated Enforcement.Feedback Requested ML20137Y5401996-11-0505 November 1996 Forwards Info on Two Issues to Be Discussed W/Panel at Meeting Scheduled for 961106.Partially Deleted ML20138G3651996-11-0505 November 1996 Requests That Listed Info Be Forwarded to Licensee in Connection W/Unescorted Access Visits to Plant by Listed NRC Contractor Employees During 961118-970110 for Purpose of Assisting NRC in Conduct of Design Insp.Partially Deleted ML20136E3011996-10-31031 October 1996 Forwards Schedule for Activities at Plant for Next Few Months ML20136E4691996-10-31031 October 1996 Discusses Criticality Monitoring Ltr & Requests Response to Listed Question ML20136E3961996-10-31031 October 1996 Informs That Violation Withdrawn Re Licensee Use of Ccw/Icw (Svc Water) in Mode 5 at Plant ML20140E5191996-10-29029 October 1996 Discusses Addl Info for Plant Panel,Just Received from Inspector ML20140E5801996-10-29029 October 1996 Discusses EA Worksheet on Plant Re Wiring Error Affecting Nuclear Instrumentation ML20140E5901996-10-29029 October 1996 Forwards Enforcement Action Worksheet ML20140E5241996-10-29029 October 1996 Forwards Wordperfect Version as Requested ML20134E9191996-10-29029 October 1996 Forwards Rationale for Inital Plants Selected for Design Insps & for Plants Considered for Second Quarter FY97 Design Insps ML20136E5641996-10-28028 October 1996 Replies to News Summary Re Escalated Enforcement for Plant on 961025 IR 05000335/19950151996-10-28028 October 1996 Forwards Draft Insp Repts 50-335/95-15 & 50-389/95-15 on 960907-1012 1999-03-03
[Table view] Category:MEMORANDUMS-CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20207L5671999-03-12012 March 1999 Forwards Facility Submitted Outline,Initial Exam Submittal & as Given Operating Exam for Test Administered on 981130,1204-14 & 18 ML20207E6091999-03-0303 March 1999 Forwards NRC Approved Operator Licensing Exam (Facility Outline & Initial Exam Submittal & as-given Operating Exam) for Tests Administered on 980622-26 ML20236Y6301998-08-0808 August 1998 Forwards Monthly Rept Reflecting Status of 10CFR2.206 Petitions as of 980731.Petitions on Plant GT97494 & GT97339 for Which DD Became Final Actions During Month Were Closed. Portion of Encl Withheld ML20237A0011998-08-0707 August 1998 Informs That Extension Granted on Envirocare Decision of 980904.Two Week Extension on Philadelphia VA Decision of 980828 Requested.Submits Concurrence of Changes.Rept on 2.206 July Status for Plants Encl ML20248L8621998-06-0909 June 1998 Forwards May 1998 Rept on Status of Public Petitioners Under 10CFR2.206.Petition on Seabrook (GT970873) for Which DD 98- 03 Became Final Agency Decision on 980413 Closed.Attachment 3 Withheld ML20203M6681998-02-23023 February 1998 Forwards SER Re TR CENPD-199-P,Rev 1-P-A,Suppl 2-P, CE Setpoint Methodology Proposing CRGR Review Be Waived IAW Suggested Procedures in 890929 Memo ML20202E0141997-11-25025 November 1997 Forwards FOIA Request Received Direct in Region II from E Barton on 971125.Encl Partially Deleted IA-97-461, Forwards FOIA Request Received Direct in Region II from E Barton on 971125.Encl Partially Deleted1997-11-25025 November 1997 Forwards FOIA Request Received Direct in Region II from E Barton on 971125.Encl Partially Deleted ML20205D4281997-08-15015 August 1997 Discusses Concern Identified During Special Design Architect-Engineer Insp Re EQ of Unit 1 Terry Turbine Woodward Governor Controls for Steam Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump IA-99-106, Discusses Concern Identified During Special Design Architect-Engineer Insp Re EQ of Unit 1 Terry Turbine Woodward Governor Controls for Steam Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump1997-08-15015 August 1997 Discusses Concern Identified During Special Design Architect-Engineer Insp Re EQ of Unit 1 Terry Turbine Woodward Governor Controls for Steam Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump ML20205M3331997-07-28028 July 1997 Provides Final Agenda for Region II Enforcement Meeting to Be Held on 970730.OI Attendance Requested for Issue Involving Termination of Turkey Point Radwaste Operator Who Failed to Follow Procedure IR 05000335/19970051997-07-17017 July 1997 Forwards Allegation Evaluation Rept & NRC Insp Repts 50-335/97-05 & 50-389/97-05 Re RII-97-A-0116 ML20202E0261997-04-23023 April 1997 Discusses Technical Staff Actions Associated W/Three Concerns in Allegation RII-96-A-0251 ML20137L2971997-03-31031 March 1997 Forwards Matrix Containing Answer to Listed Questions in ,Rev 1 ML20148A7131997-03-28028 March 1997 Forwards Addl Responses Needed to Grant Exemptions.Items 2,5,6 & 7 Seem Appropriate for St Lucie to Respond to ML20137R8831997-03-27027 March 1997 Provides Info Requested by 960208 Memo from J Stolz Re Review of Spent Fuel Pool Practices & Current Licensing Basis ML20137L2311997-03-25025 March 1997 Forwards Summary of Changes Made to Safeguards Review Rept, Rev 47 to St Lucie Physical Security Plan,Case Control Number N5S76VA50033596.W/o Encl ML20137L0981997-03-25025 March 1997 Forwards Summary of Changes Made to Safeguards Review Rept, Rev 37 to St Lucie Physical Security Plan,Case Control Number N5S63VA50033593.W/o Encl ML20136E9261997-03-0606 March 1997 Forwards SALP Input Feeder Info at St Lucie Facility from 940102-960106 & Requests That Technical Staff Complete Review by 951222 ML20136A9241997-02-28028 February 1997 Partially Withheld Memo Discussing drop-in Visit of J Broadhead,Chairman & CEO FPL Group & Chairman & CEO FP&L Co & J Goldberg ML20137L2751996-12-16016 December 1996 Requests Guidance in Addressing Issues Re Use of Temporary Fire Pump W/O Evaluation & Construction of Enclosure for Control Rod Drive Electronic Equipment within Cable Spreading Room,W/O Appropriate Evaluation ML20136A6751996-12-0909 December 1996 Partially Withheld Memo Discussing Directors Decision 96-19 Under 10CFR2.206 Re Steam Generator Issued at St Lucie ML20137R5381996-11-22022 November 1996 Informs That Rept IR 94-008 for St Lucie Opens Item 94-008-02-URI Quality Level of PORV & SRV Discharge Piping ML20136E6221996-11-19019 November 1996 Informs That Draft in on Operator Activities Affecting Reactivity Being Distributed ML20136E6991996-11-19019 November 1996 Requests Info Re Sheron St Lucie Visit.Info Requested by 961120 ML20136E6791996-11-18018 November 1996 Forwards Background Info on St Lucie Nuclear Instrumentation Insp ML20136E6881996-11-18018 November 1996 Forwards Background Info on St Lucie Nuclear Instumentation Insp ML20136E6081996-11-15015 November 1996 Provides List of Corrective Actions That Have Been Rolled Into Speakout Program ML20136E5461996-11-14014 November 1996 Forwards File Submitted to Kerry on 961024 Re PIM-like Summary of Events from 92-93 ML20136E4911996-11-13013 November 1996 Forwards Updated Schedule for St Lucie FY1 ML20138G4131996-11-12012 November 1996 Requests Technical assistance,TIA-019,re Discrepancies Between Containment Radiation Monitoring Sys Described in Usfar & Regulatory Guide 1.45 at Plants ML20140E5361996-11-12012 November 1996 Forwards Plant EA Worksheet ML20140E6591996-11-12012 November 1996 Provides Revs of Plant Violations for Current Hour ML20140E5301996-11-0808 November 1996 Forwards Input Received from Dan & Revised EA Worksheet from Incorporating Input.Few Slight Revs Were Made to Notice of Violation ML20140E6201996-11-0707 November 1996 Provides Two Violations That Are Subjects of EA Worksheet ML20140E6521996-11-0707 November 1996 Informs That D Barss Will Be e-mailing Input on Items 5 & 6 for Incorporation Into EA Worksheet ML20137R9031996-11-0606 November 1996 Requests That Info Re St Lucie Be Mailed to Author.Info May Be Found in Plan of Day Handout,Provided by Residents ML20140E5941996-11-0606 November 1996 Informs That Plant Violations 1 & 2 Re Emergency Prepardness Program Insp,Being Looked at for Escalated Enforcement.Feedback Requested ML20137Y5401996-11-0505 November 1996 Forwards Info on Two Issues to Be Discussed W/Panel at Meeting Scheduled for 961106.Partially Deleted ML20138G3651996-11-0505 November 1996 Requests That Listed Info Be Forwarded to Licensee in Connection W/Unescorted Access Visits to Plant by Listed NRC Contractor Employees During 961118-970110 for Purpose of Assisting NRC in Conduct of Design Insp.Partially Deleted ML20136E3961996-10-31031 October 1996 Informs That Violation Withdrawn Re Licensee Use of Ccw/Icw (Svc Water) in Mode 5 at Plant ML20136E3011996-10-31031 October 1996 Forwards Schedule for Activities at Plant for Next Few Months ML20136E4691996-10-31031 October 1996 Discusses Criticality Monitoring Ltr & Requests Response to Listed Question ML20140E5901996-10-29029 October 1996 Forwards Enforcement Action Worksheet ML20134E9191996-10-29029 October 1996 Forwards Rationale for Inital Plants Selected for Design Insps & for Plants Considered for Second Quarter FY97 Design Insps ML20140E5191996-10-29029 October 1996 Discusses Addl Info for Plant Panel,Just Received from Inspector ML20140E5801996-10-29029 October 1996 Discusses EA Worksheet on Plant Re Wiring Error Affecting Nuclear Instrumentation ML20140E5241996-10-29029 October 1996 Forwards Wordperfect Version as Requested ML20136E5791996-10-28028 October 1996 Discusses Plant Ni Eaw ML20136E5691996-10-28028 October 1996 Forwards Plant Calendar Update 1999-03-03
[Table view] |
Text
~ --
s i
AUG 3 y yggS f
MEMORANDUM FOR:
David Mathews, Project Director l
Project Directorate II-I i
Division of Reactor Projects I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation i
FROM:
Mark Cunningham, Chief Probabilistic Risk Analysis Branch i
Division of Systems Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ST. LUCIE IPEEE SUBMITTAL Based on our ongoing review of the St. Lucie Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE) submittal and its associated documentation, we have developed the attached request for additional information (RAI). The RAI is related to the external event analyses in the IPEEE, including the seismic analysis, the fire analysis, and the analyses on effects of high winds, i
floods, and others. The RAI was developed by our contractor, Energy Research, 4
Inc., and reviewed by the " Senior Review Board" (SRB). The SRB is comprised of RES and NRR staff and RES consultants (Sandia National Laboratory) with i
probabilistic risk assessment expertise for external events.
We request that the licensee provide its response within 60 days in conformance with our review schedule.
If you have any questions concerning our review, please contact John T. Chen l
at 415-6549.
1
Attachment:
As stated cc:
W. Hodges J. Murphy S. Varga R. Hernan J. Norris Distribution:
CMcCracken SWest Econnell GBagcht RRothman AMurphy NChokshi TChang PChen RWoods ABusiik PRAB Sub/ File MBohn, SANDIA SNowlen, SANDIA DOSUMENT NAME:G:\\ST-LUCIE.Q1 N
(
M bPh f
~
Y N
See previous concurrence 4
t.
.n.em. w me mm.m.:MW m2 d g r c ww..
v n. u.
oerica oerieus-1 oeriw 16, oerisme 7 1&
1 g
_ _. fn NAW JCh.n:he SGs. edit oATE o i le fee
{@
@ /$
-. -.. m ass a i
- g()
NHC FR.E CENTER COPY
- 0006
1 MEMORANDUM FOR:
David Mathews, Project Director Project Directorate 11-1 Division of Reactor Projects I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FRDM:
Mark Cunningham, Chief Probabilistic Risk Analysis Branch Division of Systems Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ST. LUCIE IPEEE SUBMITTAL Based on our ongoing review of the St. Lucie-Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE) submittal and its associated documentation, we have developed the attached request for additional information (RAI). The RAI is related to the external event analyses in the IPEEE, including the seismic analysis, the fire analysis, and the analyses on effects of high winds, floods, and others.
We request that the licensee provide its response within 60 days in conformance with our review schedule.
i i
If you have any questions concerning our review, please contact John T. Chen at 415-6549.
i
Attachment:
- As stated cc:
W. Hodges T. King S. Varga R. Hernan J. Norris Distribution:
CMcCracken SWest Econnell GBagchi RRothman AMurphy NChokshi TChang PChen RWoods ABuslik PRAB Sub/ File M8ohn, SANDIA SNowlen, SANDIA DOCUMENT NAME:G:\\ST LUCIE.01 CF Y
N PDR Y
N w...n.s e, e
- m. me m s. uw c. c.n m.n.cmm n. c.n m.n m n. u...n 0FFICE DST /PRAB afr'(,l i DST /PRAB
]
DST /PRAB
[
[
NAME JChen:bg;f' MDrouin MCunningham DATE 9 / /6/9 51/
/ /95
/ /95 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY (RES File Code) RES 2C-5
_._._-.__..__._.____.._.___.__m._.._
- a i
ATTACHMENT 1
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION-ON ST. LUCIE IPEEE SUBMITTAL i
l I.
Seismic 4
l.
Two success paths (preferred and alternate paths) should be developed for-seismic IPEEE evaluation following EPRI seismic margin assessment I
methodology. Apparently, only one success path was developed in the i
. Turkey Point seismic adequacy study. Please identify the additional success path that insures that hot shutdown is maintained for 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />.
i Please provide the list and the walkdown findings of components associated with this alternate path. Please also. provide success path logic diagrams that illustrate the basis for their selection.
l 2.
Please provide a list of components that were (would be) consirdered in j
the containment performance walkdown for Turkey Point Nuclear Plant, i
describe the basis for developing this list, and provide the walkdown results.
3.
Please provide a discussion of the process for addressing seismic-fire interaction concerns at Turkey Point Nuclear Plant.
List all walkdown-i related findings pertaining to potential seismic-fire interactions i
involving IPEEE components.
l 4.
Please provide a discussion of your resolution pertaining to GI-131, i
with respect to potential seismic vulnerabilities (or interaction concerns) associated with the in-core flux mapping system.
Please j
describe the configuration of the flux mapping systems at Turkey Point, i
a demonstration of adequacy of lateral restraint of the systems, and j
evaluation findings pertaining to potential seismic interactions.
I 5.
For all instances of seismic interaction concerns related to block walls =
1 i
that were noted by the SRT, please provide calculations which demonstrate adequate seismic capability of these walls.
6.
The peer review report by Dr. Paul Smith, pertaining to the St. Lucie Unit 2 seismic adequacy evaluation, noted that additional seismic interaction concerns were identified during the peer review walkdown.
[
Please list these other seismic interaction concerns, and explain their disposition status.
II.
Fire 1.
-Did the analysis team conduct a walkdown of the plant prior to the completion of the fire analysis pcrtion of the IPE?
If a walkdown was J
conducted, provide information regarding team composition, areas j
surveyed, scope of the walkdown, and a summary of the walkdown findings.
t 1
l i
e
d 2.
The IPEEE submittal indicates that only selected areas were visited and reviewed.
Please provide the list of areas that were visited. What was 1
the basis for not visiting other areas of the plant?
j 1
3.
The IPEEE does not address the initiatirg events (e.g., LOCAs, loss of offsite power, etc.) as a separate sd, ject. No list is provided as to which initiating events were analyz d and no description is provided concerning final conclusions as to which initiating events are ponnole.
Provide the list of initiating events that were addressed, as well as j
the conclusion and basis as to which initiating events could occur from 1
which compartment.
4.
A plant-specific fire events data base has not been used.
This can be an optimistic practice if St. Lucie Plant has experienced fire events in safety related areas.
If such events have taken place in any safety related area since initial commercial operation, provide an assessment of the effect of these events on the fire frequencies.
4 5.
Please provide an analysis of the effect on fire-induced CDF if the potential for the failure of active barrier components such as doors and l
dampers for all fire areas, and the potential for cross-zone fire propagation is considered for high hazard areas such as the turbine building, diesel generator room, cable spreading room, switchgear rooms, and lube oil storage areas.
6.
On page 17 of the IPEEE submittal, it is claimed that credit was taken for the installed preaction suppression system in screening out two Unit 2 compartments. Does this mean that it was assumed that the preaction suppression system will work perfectly, and therefore no fire propagation will take place? If it is assumed that it is not perfect, provide further information as to how the system was modelled in the fire analysis.
If it is assumed as a perfect system, what would the core damage frequency be if the suppression system is assumed to be non-existent?
7.
A single value is used to model the possibility of detection and suppression failure; for the majority of cases, a probability of 0.1 is used.
It is not apparent that this method addresses all the factors that affect the likelihood of failure to suppress the fire before critical damage has occurred using area specific information.
For example, if cables and equipment are in close proximity, fire may cause critical damage before successful suppression.
Provide justification for using the specific probability values.
8.
There is no discussion in the IPEEE of fire-suppression-induced damage in any of the phases of the analysis (i.e., damage to equipment as a result of the activation of the fire suppression system in extinguishing a small fire in a given area). Are there any compartments where equipment (e.g., motors and electrical cabinets) are susceptible to water damage, and yet the fire impact analysis has considered these equipment as available after the successful operation of the fire i 3 i
suppression system? Provide a summary discussion on how this issue has been addressed.
9.
Human recovery actions are identified as one of the most critical event in the fire scenario importance ranking list provided in the IPEEE i
submittal report. However, no details are provided concerning how probabilities of recovery failure were assessed. Provide a detailed description of how fire event recovery actions were assessed, including how factors such as sequence timing, elevated environmental stressors (e.g., reduced visibility, impaired communications, and impaired i
accessibility) were accounted for.
If IPE values were assumed, were they adjusted to reflect reduced reliability during a fire event and, if so, how were they adjusted?
If IPE values were used directly, provide a i
justification for not having adjusted the values.
{
10.
Credit has been'taken for the activation of a cross-tie breaker connecting the electric power of one unit to the other unit. As stated in the preceding RAI, has the evaluation of recovery action failure 1
probability addressed the possibility of interference by the fire and smoke? Provide a description of the analysis, if smoke egress j
phenomenon has been considered. Otherwise, provide the basis for not including it in the analysis.
11.
The licensee has not demonstrated and summarized how the core damage frequency is estimated for each fire scenario.
Provide a set of typical calculations supporting the estimated P, values.
4 i
12.
Fire modeling is used as the basis for concluding that the B Switchgear room does not pose a fire vulnerability.
Provide a sample set of the calculations used to reach this conclusion.
In the sample package, include a drawing of the area, location of the postulated pilot fires, j
and locations of. target cables and equipment. Also, include criteria used for equipment and cable failures.
l 13.
Provide accident sequence related information per Appendix 3 of GL 88-l 20, Supplement 4.
As a minimum, such information should be made available for all compartments for which core damage frequency is greater than 10/yr.
I 14.
Does Intake Cooling Water System failure lead to CCW failure?
If yes, provide a list of areas where a fire can cause loss of ICW and an assessment of their impact on core damage frequency.
If not, what systems can cause the failure of CCW, and how have those systems been accounted for in the fire analysis.
l
.15.
The results of the screen-out computations for fire compartments listed in Table 4-2 have not been provided in the IPEEE submittal.
Please d
T.
j l
provide a sumary of the computed results for each of those fire zones j
with screening criteria "C", "D" and "E" (per Table 4-2 definition).
III. Hiah Winds. Floods. and Others None.
i 2
4 1
i i
j l
l 1
f a
i i
1 I
1 i
J i
i 4
e ;
1 i
i
'