ML20127A314

Amend 7 to Environ Rept - OL Stage

ML20127A314
Person / Time
Site:	Braidwood
Issue date:	06/30/1985
From:	COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20127A288	List: ML20127A284 ML20127A303 ML20127A314
References
ENVR-850630, NUDOCS 8506210099
Download: ML20127A314 (16)

Text

.

Brcidwatd ER-OLS AMENDMENT 7

, JUNE 1985 INSTRUCTIONS FOR UPDATING YOUR ER To update your copy of the Braidwood Station Environmenta's Report - Operating License Stage, please remove and destr ay the following pages and insert the Amendment 7 pages as indicated.

VOLUME 1 REMOVE INSERT Page 11 Page 11 VOLUME 2 REMOVE INSERT Page 11 Page 11 Pages 3.9-1/3.9-2 and Pages 3.9-1/3.9-2 through 3.9-3/3.9-4 3.9-4 Figure 3.9-2 Figure 3.9-2 Figure 6.1-7 Figure 6.1-7 Pages QE100.1-1/QE100.1-2 Pages OE100.1-1/QE100.1-2 and QE100.1-3 /QE100.1-4 and QE100.1-3/QE100.1-4 Following Page A6-1 Page A7-1 (do not remove)

$$$$s# s

l

' l Broidw:cd ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 1 FEBRUARY 1983 )

AMENDMENT 2 i JULY 1983 AMENDMENT 3 SEPTEMBER 1983 AMENDMENT 4 OCTOBER 1983 AMENDMENT 5 DECEMBER 1983 AMENDMENT 6 MAY 1984 AMENDMENT 7 JUNE 1985 BRAIDWOOD NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION - UNITS 1&2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT - OPERATING LICENSE STAGE CONTENTS CHAPTER VOLUME Chapter 8.0 - Economic and Social Ef fects of Station Construction and Operation 2 Chapter 9.0 - Alternative Energy Sources and Sites 2 Chapter 10.0 - Station Design Alternatives 2 Chapter 11.0 - Summary of Cost-Benefit Analysis 2 Chapter 12.0 - Environmental Approvals and Consultation 2 Chapter 13.0 - References 2 Amendment 1 - Voluntary Revisions 2 Amendment 2 - NRC Review Questions and Responses 2 Amendment 3 - NRC Review Questions and Responses 2 Amendment 4 - NRC Review Questions and Responses 2 Amendment 5 - NRC Review Questions and Responses 2 Amendment 6 - Voluntary Revisions 2 Amendment 7 - Voluntary Revisions 2 O 11

Broidw:cd ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 AMENDMENT 2 JULY 1983 AMENDMENT 3 SEPTEMBER 1983 AMENDMENT 4 OCTOBER 1983 AMENDMENT 5 DECEMBER 1983 AMENDMENT 6 MAY 1984 AMENDMENT 7 JUNE 1985 BRAIDWOOD NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION - UNITS 1&2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT - OPERATING LICENSE STAGE CONTENTS CHAPTER VOLUME Chapter 8.0 - Economic and Social Ef fects of Station 2 Construction and operation Chapter 9.0 - Alternative Energy Sources and Sites 2 Chapter 10.0 - Station Design Alternatives 2 Chapter 11.0 - Summary of Cost-Benefit Analysis 2 Chapter 12.0 - Environmental Approvals and Consultation 2 Chapter 13.0 - Ref erences 2 1 - Voluntary Revisions 2 Amendment 2 - NRC Review Questions and Responses 2 Amendment Amendment 3 - NRC Review Questions and Responses 2 Amendment 4 - NRC Review Questions and Responses 2 Amendment 5 - NRC Review Questions and Responses 2 6 - Voluntary Revisions 2 Amendment 7 - Voluntary Revisions 2 Amendment O 11

Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 AMENDMENT 7 O' JUNE 1985 3.9 TRANSMISSION FACILITIES 3.9.1 LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY Figure 3.9-1 shows the transmission connections for the Braidwood Nuclear Station. These consist of existing double circuit 345 kV lines connecting to the LaSalle County Generating Station and the East Frankfort Transmission Substation and of a double circuit 345 kV line constructed on new right-of-way (ROW) to an existing line on the property of the Crete Transmission Substation. One circuit of the double circuiit 345 kV line will connect to the Bloom Trans-mission Substation with an intermediate connection at the Davis Creek Substation. The other circuit will connect to the Burnham Transmission Substation. No connection will be made to the Crete 7 Transmission Substation. There are no plans at this time to con-struct any additional transmission line originating f rom the Braidwood Station in conjunction with Units 1 and 2.

Figure 3.9-2 shows the detailed route of the new line from the Braidwood Nuclear Generating Station - Units 1 and 2 (Braidwood q Station) to the existing Crete Transmission Substation. This route traverses approximately 55 miles and crosses nearly flat agricul-tural land of low relief.

(])

The basic ROW requirement for the double circuit 345 kV line which will transmit the power from Braidwood Station is 145 feet wide.

The following ROW descriptions are included so that land use can be evaluated for all property acquired, including archeological sur-veys. A 330 foot ROW that includes space for a double circuit 345 kV line and a future line comprises the first 7.3 miles. The next 15.6 miles is, in general, also 330 feet wide and accommodates a 7 four circuit 345/138 kV transmission line and, for the most part, has space for a future line. In Section 36 of Rockville Township in Kankakee County, the four-circuit construction terminates at the Davis Creek Transmission Substation. The double circuit 345 kV line continues north f or 7.4 miles on a 315 foot wide ROW that can also accomodate a future line. The next 17 miles between Wilton and Washington Townships involves a 180-foot widening of an existing 200-foot ROW. This 380-foot ROW will have a double circuit 345 kV line parallel to and with structures opposite those of an existing 765 kV line. From Washington Township 7.75 miles northward to the Crete Substation, a new 235-foot ROW will accommodate a double cir-cult 345 kV line and a future four circuit 138/345 kV line (see rigure 3.9-2). Structure types for the 55 mile transmission line will be similar throughout, single shaft structures for tangent and light angles (up to 130) and lattice steel towers f or angles over 130 The single shaft structures will normally not exceed 6 feet 3.9-1

. Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 AMENDMENT 7 JUNE 1985 1

3.9.4 RADIATED ELECTRICAL AND ACOUSTICAL NOISE The diameter of the conductors used will be in the range that re-sults in low corona, audible noise, and electric noise. The same engineering criteria used on past designs, resulting in few prob- 7 less, has been duplicated or improved for this transmission line.

3.9.5 INDUCED OR CONDUCTED GROUND CURRENTS Induced or conducted ground currents can become a significant fac-tot in urban areas where extensive networks of pipes and cables have been placed underground. The magnitudes of currents induced into such underground networks are dependent upon the current in the overhead transmission lines, the distance above the ground, the soil characteristics, and the extent of parallelism between the transmission lines and the underground equipment. Also, during high ground f ault conditions, present designs are such that the entire fault current does not pass through the ground. High speed relays at the substations operate to render such situations highly transient, reducing the potential corrosion due to the " battery effect". (The soil can serve as as an electrolyte between the transmission ground and the underground equipment of other sys-tems. As with conventional batteries, corrosion of these "ter-O minals" could result. ) A complete analysis of these problems can-not be made until the load currents have been determined and load flow studies have been completed.

3.9.6 ELECTROSTATIC FIELD EFFECTS Electrostatic fields are present at any voltage level. The field strength is dependent upon voltage, height of conduct, and distance from the centerline of the support structure. Past installations of 138 kV and 345 kV lines have produced few if any complaints.

Introduction of 765 kV lines, however, has caused review of these effects and explanations to the public of the electrostatic fields under these lines. The intensity of the field can be calculated before installation and actually checked by measurement after in-sta11ation. Past experience has shown calculated values to have been conservative. Based on these conservative calculated values, the 345 kV lines, either independently or in conjunction with 138 kV lines, are not expected to cause significant electrostatic ef-facts. Where the 345 kV lines are to be placed parallel to the existing 765 kV line, Section J-K as depicted on Figure 3.9-2, cal-culated values show that the field intensity is increased slightly 7 in some areas and actually decreases in other areas. In either 3.9-3

1 Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 AMENDMENT 7 JUNE 1985 case the incremental dif ference is so slight as to be hardly meas-urable. It is planned to measure the field strength before instal-lation and again af ter installation of the 345 kV lines for compara-tive analysis. As in the past, Ceco. will work cooperatively with landowners to mitigate or correct any adverse ef f ects caused by the electrostatic field. Corrective measures will be in accordance with the following paragraphs.

1 Fences and other fixed metallic objects in and along transmission line rights-of-way are grounded when CECO. design calculations O

O 3.9-3a 7;

f Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983lll indicate that the eletrostatically induced drain current would exceed the minimum level of perception (approximately 1 milli-ampere) of a person touching the fence or metallic object.

Induced voltages on electric fences are drained by the installation of drain coils at appropriate intervcls. The grounding technique for non-electric fences on wood posts is to install steel posts at 1 Eppropriate intervals and connect the fence to them. Fences on steel fence posts do not need additional grounding.

With respect to mobile equipment, the ground clearance of the 345 kV lines will be such that under all conditions the current due to electrostatic effects will be less than 5 milliamperes, rms, if the largest anticipated trucks, vehicles or equipment operated under the lines were short circuited to ground.

3.9.7 OZONE PRODUCTION The generation of gaseous ef fluents as a result of corona activity on extra high voltage (EHV) transmission lines has been raised as an environmental issue. As a result, CECO. engaged the services of an outside consultant to determine the validity and magnitude of the ozone effect. ggg Since the ozone has only recently been recognized as a potential pollutant, some background information on the substance may be helpful. Ozone (03 ) is 50% denser than oxygen (0 2) and is a very reactive compound. It is formed naturally in three ways:

High in the atmosphere, oxygen reacts with ultraviolet sunlight to form ozone, which circulates to lower altitudes as a result of weather. Sunlight reacting with airborne pollutants can also create ozone. Finally, lightning and other high voltage discharges cause oxygen to disassociate and recombine to form ozone. Gener-ally, 'the ambient ozone level is proportional to the strength of the sunlight, increasing during the day and decreasing during the night. North winds, however, also bring in ozone from the Arctic.

It is possible for high voltage transmission lines to produce ozone if they have high voltage discharges (corona). The U.S. and Illinois Environmental Protection Agencies have set an air quality standard of 8 parts per 100 million as the maximum 1-hour concen-tration, which is not to be exceeded more than once per year.

A field test program has been completed on the CECO. system. the program provides comparative data for three locations: (a) remote from high voltage transmission lines for the ambient ozone level of <

the area; (b) adjacent to a 345 kV switchyard; and (c) on the R0W of the existing 765 kV transmission line presently in operation on the CECO. system, ggg 3.9-4

/

. ~ . . . . , . . , .

~. - - _ . - _ - -

A%

j n PROPOSED 34SKv/

D / ISO KW 4 CIRCulf

' STRUCTURE g- 3.s are 6 acna A A wI / e l t , C E Co.

-se . - as - R o w. f C.E. CO.

,, R O. w.

x .,_ - m ,

A e ~

cauts a

. .2 7.1, g- i 82, u

na jos

• _, [ _ 45s' R.o.w. =

• I SECTION C-D

_ m mactN ',%.

M sooo' spas.s o.s4 miles t

. (LOOKING FROW BRA 10wo001

-s_

l l -

l /* .

. e g

C.E. Co.

( R.o.w.

. '6 .

. f NS m, s .+t 2 V8' I , .

. : ., g __

l l l e l SECTION

. ( .3. ev om). 1000* SPANS, O

{ i f f , f' (LOOKING FROM

,-  :. ...y .. s-

i  ! 3.,6o.o.P

. s sac a. ero :? ..

l _A jus 3 _A.l%.

_d'>"~1dg- , _A_ _,L _A_ _A-(n. i  : i

q. /f, i i i i '

i_A_'s

I m

m

_a_ %

_ A_ _A- -

_L_ - . ' . -_A- _A_ _ 2. _ _,'

i d'

-__-__ i,

+A--A N

4 l 348 3 I

. 1 e 3 I l

.1 ' -- --- x

->=- - l. - 4 5 lg.'l (i '_ .I._  : -- --

i-'.- ->

l ast ' ' ' ' '

gy

/ 6 '

, ba* W E ' \ l 1 l

8ElGd4T PROPOSED 345 MW 00 VOLE C4RCUIT STRUCTURE d A ,,,

4 A PROPOSED 34SMV/

838 KV 4 C4RCulf C E. CO. 1 C.E. CO. STRUCTURE grow. R.o.w g .%

248' -!: v& RIES sa'-tSFb PROPOSED =

5 50'- 40S' R.o w. # A BRAIDWOO SECTION A-B

/lj . te 3000* SPANS. 7.5 MILES (Looming FRCet S R AIDWOOO)

[ :f A. , Ny I s  %

c c a.1.. .p} '

plb w*: clbi*:y .

293*

. ,, f . e-van.i.ES r -

- (.. . . ,,, '

u o - .o..

• ~ ~~**am i

s J

e , [_[- i

_ .i, _

SECTION 0-C, 0-E 1000' 5 PANS. 43 0 8 o.5 MILES

.w,J -oL,i._.,_.i.yf.m,_

c a, o. ,. stoomiNo FRou mRAio oo0 u., , ,. . / ,.I o

... S i nus re saw m _

._ T1,a .._ y& i

_.m;

! /fO;f eb[/e A,l f __ ! _

ma== ansa . ,  ;

g f

_ ;. .s __ ! _ _.L L_ _L) ) _1_ ' w -

t

. . . .,. .c . .f. . . y . . ./. .

_m I n f <. ------'_-___p-- -------

e

- . __ _. 5 _ _

k- !t _f_ .

.u ,p, it, . i _ .'., .', . 's _!_ _ ! -. -.L _ i. ' . _ f'i__ei k a- m .

{ ,

1. _' . i ,

,s.o.,_/

/ % Q ' ' ..... h ..... _M-_

u , - -

8. - __! d _ '. _ ,

'. I' _ iA._N_i _ '

. . L'q!gif _3

i i i

i gi ,

j i '

m ,.

mesh e .e ,

T S.S 142 h. . . ' ' k--.--e-EXi TING DOUBLE CIRCUlf 345 KV TO'!!ER CRETE % mdt b'i. LINEt TO BURNHAM TSS 8 BLOOM TSS g 1 t N L

...lDhT 7--- , - -f'~ 'tI _. - - ' '*+o'

~

. JUNE 1985 PROPOSED 34SKV EXISTING l l as l A

-*-- at -

l s

/ a!  !

DouSLE CIRCult STRUCTURE 7sSuv tower 4

DOPoSED 3488tV/

e 034 etV 4-CIRCulf

"*[

, i I e

"* jas 8 STRUCTURE  ! *" ", I \ /

d A d'h ' ! *

[

3 [

p a o Co f k y; o w.

l- i . ,

M h '

.r --- ---

I IIS' I 63 3' loo

• I S . l loo

• ADD'L R.o w. REo'O 1 j ak- j- EXISTING too* R.o.w.

CE.Co.}

R.o.w. j -

soo' R.o.w.  ;-

1' ' 0 I,

cw a

w 2

I ann i.e.ptpe Tw SECTION J-K

0.  ;- 125o' SPANS,17.o MILES

! so I

' u4 (LooKING FRoM 8RA10woool 7-G ,

j f ~

["j,,,  ;  ;

...i... _._ ......-..

• L,.( l,

. k l

_his / ,k PRoeoSED 34Sav l ooveLE CIRCulf l1l  ; l STRUCiumE

)i_

i

) eh

- _ , , t 's  ! . _ ,i, _ =>> _ /. _ x, I ' '

Le if 2.it 4 A

- sa. -es - .

"_ gy. #'% - a S --

, A C. E. Co. C.E. Co.

gR.o. w. f. R o w. g d - ,', _ j  %  % m *-'"

{' !

I _',_l'L.j'.s l

- ' y 3

,*3 5 to I i

31 S' R. o. w.

!: Tr.. -

1

~ (LIMifEO To 14S' oNLY FOR A FEw PARCELSI l l [ Y I l c.o ' '

SECTION H-J C W Iooo* SPANS 7.4 MILES (LooKING FRoM SmaicevoDI g.

y '

' w-Apertare Card j

,- r')!) .r* .

.I  !

g l 4J'* ale my L, Ogos

! -at- .[' ' .[

l PROPOSED 34Suv/

i l)$ KV 4 *Cl4CUlf PROPOSED 343mv EWNRE g

a STRUCTURE 00UGLE CIRCulf STRUCTURE l ,

, - , . -  !,, j .

t,, . .tzw s% CARD I ' I

1. l A w f esE2E h z jf**

f ** 4 W I C.E . Co.

'.--- . --- -- C E. Co.

• C. E. Co.

(C.E. Row. Co. ,

R o w.) 7 R.o w. ,

R.o w. 7

'. /c,_. / 8S "E .-- 72'- s" : ! - 72'-s"-

I e

~ 7 a*- s"? /G 2 '- L '

8 4S' R.o.w. 23S' R.o.w.

j

/ l "I O IO '" 0"# # **#E' SECTION E F '

,gu 1' gi = -f. i 1000' SPANS, o.se uiLES

S O pm a,',a- r, (LoomsNo FRom eRAio oool ,noo.ECTION SPANS, 7. 75K-L MsL E S wie www.

(*

r GbY.M" , ' " " "

Fi- -l - /

(Loomisse FRoM emaio oool BRAIDWOOD NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION i'$a m e'gm o, UNITS I 8 2 fbd-'.J m

g j .i. . E './,(

isssv ENylRONMENTAL REPORT OPERATING LICEf4SE STAGE b b .. ..- ./ --

FIGURE 3.9-2

, i, [',

jos A

..h_ ROUTE MAP 8 STRUCTURE PROFILE

-I-- - . - - - L BRAIDWOOD-CRETE R.0.W.

Q 2506xIo oc19- 0I ~~ '

F

~AEUstENT7 JUNE 1985 LEGEND:

A Air Sampler and Thermoluminescent  ;

Dosimeters.

Q A Air Sampler and Thermoluminescent "

Dosimeters as Part of Dresden -

Program. #

@ Surf ace Water. Sediment,& Benthic Organisms. J olie t

@ Fish 0

@ Vegetables and Other Human Food g4 Crops as Part of Dresden Program. e (Exact Locations are Not Known.) e O Dreseen Station 4 f

• Iw d Note: Locations of Milk Sampling are e C

Not Shown. A.

ggggoots

@ ilmington t

Wilmington Dam Diamond W@

O 5 b N ,o CoalBraidwoo City @

_=. --. .= A g

% @4, G oyo- dle. Custer Braidwood l 9 Site A Brac ville G ardngr _

Essex gIntake o e Area A

South Wilmington o l el

"- $)

o E

Reddick sut O

l' t,,*

? ,,

SCALE BR AIDWOOD NUCLE AR GENERATING stall l l UNITS 1 & 2 ENVIRONMENT AL REPORT - OPER ATING LICE O FIGURE 6.1-7 RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING SAMPLING LOCATIONS 1

i .

Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 2 JULY 1983 QUESTION E100.1 In addition to other requested information, provide a summary and brief discussion, in table form, by section, of differences between currently projected environmental ef fects (including those that would degrade and those that would enhance environ-mental conditions) and the effects discussed in the environ-mental report and environmental hearings associated with the construction permit review. On a similar basis, indicate changes in plant or plant component design, location or opera-tion that have been made or planned since the construction permit review.

RESPONSE

The olf ferences between the environmental ef fects discussed in the construction permit environmental report and the current e~

operating license stage environmental report are presentea in

(,') the attachea Table Q100.1-1. The changes in plant or plant component design location or operation are presented in the attachea Table Q100.1-2.

O QE100.1-1

)

Braidwood ER-OLS AMEN 0 MENT 2 JULY 1983 AMENDMENT 7 JUNE 1985 g TABLE QE100.1-1 OlFFERENCES IN ESTIMATED ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS DISCUSSION OF SECTION BRAIDWOOD ER-CP BRAIDWOOO ER-OLS ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT 2.3.4 No consideration of archao- Archaeological surveys have Previously unkown archaeological ological resources on trans- been completed on the trans- sites are now recorded and can mission rights-of-way, mission right-of-way, be protected from future impacts.

3.9.1 Some discussion of future Discussion limited to exist- Discussion of future lines are 765, 345 and 138 kV lines lines and proposed lines not timely. Lines are not re-on portion of transmission emanating from Braidwood quired for Braidwood Station 7 rights-of-way. Station. Units I and 2 power transmission and may not be installed until well af ter the year 2000.

3.9.1 Two transmission line One transmission line right- Reduces all the Impacts normally rights-of-way. of-way. associated with transmission 1Ines including less river and highway crossings, fewer acres of farm land, woodlands and wet lands disturbed, reduced visual Impact and reduction in cost.

3.9.l.2 Lattice steel towers. Tangent and light angle Reduction in acres of farm land structures to be single taken out of production, less shaft. Interference with farming practices.

5.7 Noise at property line not Noise levels at property Ambient, predictive and some covered, line to be in accordance operational noise surveys have with appIIcable state and been conducted.

federal standards.

8.0 Station operation to create Station operation to create Larger staff and induced employ-about 200 new jobs at an approximately 533 new jobs ment will provide additional job estimated annual payroll of with an estimated annual opportunities io the local popu-

$3 million (1972 dollars). payroll of $14 million (1982 lation and the resulting larger dolIars). payrolI wiII enhance the local econcrny. Larger staff, however, will increase local traf fic and require local governmental and QE100.l-2

Braldvood ER-OLS AMEN 0 MENT 2 l JULY 1983 AMENDENT 7 O - i-TABLE QE100.1-1 (continued) l DIFFERENCES IN ESTIMATED ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS DISCUSSION OF SECTION BRAIDWOOD ER-CP BRAIDWOOD ER-OLS ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT health services (police and fire protection, sewers, schools, doctors and hospitals). Couper-Ing the 1970 and 1900 censuses shows population growth in some of the local towns and villages.

No infrastructure problems are anticipated.

8.4 Total property taxes for* Actual property taxes for Local property taxes paid by 1981 estimated to be 1900, paid in 1981, were Braidwood Station represent the

$3,218,000. $5,039,942 for the partially major source of revenue to the ca pleted plant. For 1906, local taxing units of the the first year the plant is Braidwood and Reed Township completed . The estimated area.

property taxes are

$9,281,900.

QE100.1-3

TABLE QE100.1-2 CHANGES IN PLANT DESIGN SECTION BRAIDWOOD ER-CP BRAIDWOOD ER-OLS DISCUSSION OF DIFFERENCE l

l 2.1 Cooling pond size, 2,640 Cooling pond size, 2,537 The 2640 acre figure was an

! surface acres. surface acres. estimate. The 2537 acre figure I

l is as-built after filling the pond.

2.7.1.1 Site size, 4,320 acres. Site size, 4,454 acres. Approximately 160 acres of strip mined land was added to the e southeast section of the site. 2 Minor reductions due to sale or g S exchange of small tracts and g I$ final survey adjustments re- g in a net increase of 134 acres.

Y b

3.1.1 Size of structures. Technical Support Center (TSC) The TSC addition is an elonga- b added to the turbine build- tion of the turbine building. b ing. Station gate house en- The gate house and parking lot larged and permanent parking are also enlargements and are lot enlarged, not obtrusive. '

3.1.3 Architectural Features River screenhouse modified to The river screenhouse profile

, lower profile and a screen- was lowered and the screenwall wall was added to hide trash- was added to improve the rack cleaning equipment. appearance of the facility.

3.3.4 Sanitary water system and Sanitary and demineralizer Poor quality groundwater re-3.3.5 demineralizer system water system water will be drawn suited in decision to use obtained from deep wells. frem the fresh water holding surface water.

pond with surface water from h

'4 the Kankakee River. $g

$g4 to e G. 9 .

Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 7 JUNE 1985

(} VOLUNTARY REVISIONS Amendment 7 consists of voluntary revisions to the following parts of the Braidwood Station Environmental Report - Operating License Stage:

Section 3.9 Transmission Facilities Section 6.1 Applicant's Preoperational Monitoring Programs Amendment 2 Revised Response to QE100.1 O

O A7-1

)