ML20086C377

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rept on Insp of Leaks & Cracks in (a) Steam Generator at Hb Robinson II
ML20086C377
Person / Time
Site: Robinson Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/23/1971
From: Weiss S
WISCONSIN, UNIV. OF, MILWAUKEE, WI
To:
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
13388, DC-89, NUDOCS 8311230223
Download: ML20086C377 (11)


Text

^

& a s/lk 2Page 4 1azr/71 of 11

'E i )

((

U Report on Inspection of 1 eaks and Cracks in the (A) Steam Generator at H. B. Robinson 11 Report No. DC 89 June 23,1971 l

l 1

( i Prepared for: U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Division of Compliance AEC Contract AT (11-1)-1658 Subcontract No.10 by: Dr. Stanley Weiss Materials Department f .

University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

\_ "

through: Parameter, Inc.

Consulting Engineers Elm Grove, Wisconsin

go o u u n e,,

C ON

.-- *,ir,+,,,

i

.f

., STANLEY WEISS \j,gj E ., E.11316

  • l j S ,, MILWAUKEE. y WICCONSIN -

g DNAt.

'es nnnoo '

1

. [%,

1

's , 831123o223 770623 PDR ADOCK 05000261 0 .-

FDR l3311 uwapassynemem w e enw wn :3,,me , - - ,...., - ,- -

l Rige 2 f

m  ;

s. . ./

NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Govern-ment. Neither the United States nor the United States Atomic Energy Commission, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, complete- l ness or usefulness of any information,

' 'j apparatus, product or process disclosed, (

or represents that its use would not infringe l privately-owned rights.

l l

t g-L ,)

I * '

Page 3 7,i Distribution: Copies:

tj AEC Regulatory Organization Division of Compliance Technical Programs - Washington (2)

L. Kornblith, Jr.

D. L. Pomeroy Region II, Atlanta W. C. Seidle (3)

AEC Contracts Division g Chicago Operations Office (1)

()

H. N. Miller, T. Katisch PARAMETER, Inc.

(1)

Dr. S. Weiss (1)

/~' l L)s l

l MMfNfM4W#SW2'UWW?remrtswr;ry7 < =esm - **-y+ w% pyp_2mmmypmeramm_

/* ..,

~

__ . Page 4

,.~-

1. Discuss;ons and Observations Prior to Inspection V

- A visit was made to the II. B. Robinson 11 site by Mr. Donald Kirkpatrick of Region 11 and the writer on J'u ne 18, 1971 to review and inspect the reported leaks and cracks occurring in the A steam generator.

Prior to the inspection, discussions were held with Messrs. G. P. Beatty and R. Bessac of Carolina Power and Light. We were informed that we would be allowed into the steam generatot= for only a limited time (approximately 12-15 minutes) because of existing conditions and their safety requirements. The following in-form, tion was presented to us during these inital discussions:

(1) The incone[1 cladding overlay was bonded to the base plate by the explosion bonding process.

(2) Continuous leaks in the form of droplets were observed in the A

'7 ->

generator in two locations, approximately in the region of the 40th and 44 tubes, as counted from the north direction towards the south, in the row of tubes adjacent to the divider plate in the cold leg

, of the generator.

The C steam generator was reported to exhibit dampness but no droplet formation, whereas, the B generator was reported as dry with no apparent leaks.

(3) z Ultrasonic testing performed by Westinghouse indicated that separation had occurred at the bond interface between the r ~

, cladding and the 22 inch thick tube sheet material between the rows of tubes immediately adjacent to the divider plate

/

?

T.IJ Zert:

t [fgj'[Qs24gMy**$tgy,p**:"'typ w y -";ny Tre wrrmmemp s=.m7,=gn=_qyyp~ -++- -- _- _.y

Page 5 in the hot and cold legs of the A generator. The bond sepa-O ration is believed to be extensive so as to encompass at least 80 tubes along these first rows. Ultrasonic testing further indicates that bond separation between the cladding and base

! plate ceases approximately at the mid-point of each of the a

first rows of tubes adjacent to the divider plate.

i (4) Cracks were reported in the fillet welds extending through the cladding between the tubes containing the cracked fillets in the cold leg of the A generator. Approximately 20 to 30 tube fillets were reported as visually cracked.

?,

(5) It was reported that the C generator was dry boiled whereas the A and B generators were net.

1 C) (6) Preliminary reports indicate that Point Ik ach may be ex-i ,

periencing a similar problem although the intensity of

- the problem is not yet fully known.

, 11. Inspection of the Steam Generator

, Mr. Kirkpatrick and the writer were " suited-up" and proceeded to enter indi-vidually and inspect the cold leg of the A steam generator. The inspection was

- performed visually using a low power magnifying lens. Mr. Kirkpatrick attempted t

to photograph the coiiditions.we observed with a 35 mm. camera using a close-up lens. The following conditions were observed during this inspection: (See Figs.-1,2 &$

-(1)- Severe cracks were present in the fillet welds of approxi--

mately 30 tubes. The highest intensity of fillet cracking was g, apparent in the region included in and surrounding the Sith 4

C7, 1 /.

'+s S , 3 '

~

.;;k : - ,

x g _2 ' <

Wu et ;aj ,s. &Am T.

~~

  • A ' 0 I-~~; '~"~A

Pnge 6 to 45th tubes (as counted from the north towards the south).

, x, These cracks were opened approximately . 030 to . 050 inches V

and were approximately semi-circular on the side of the fillet welds faciag the flow divider plate.

(2) Cracking in the 1/4 inch thick cladding was extensive in the region described above. These cracks were linear in the north-south direction (paraUel to the divider plate) and were located approximately in line with the center of the first row of tubes. These cracks were tighter than those ob-served in the fillets and appeared to range in the vicinity of . 005 to . 010 inches wide and extended the entire length of the cladding between the cracked tubes.

(3) Rusting and corrosion products were observed in the immed-(  ;

iate vicinity of the fillet weld cracks progressing into the cladding cracks. This evidence shows that galvanic action and electrochemical corrosion has already occurred between the tube sheet material and the austenitic materials involved, through the borated solution which acted as an electrolyte.

(4) The writer visually observed a contoured region of the cladding, adjacent to the divider plate and in the vicinity of the 40th to 50th tubes that showed definite signs of having been separated from the tube sheet.

(5) Linear crack indications in the fillet weld joining the flow divider '. late to the tube sheet cladding were observed. These m

%MW WW 9 e e 8 "

g _g

Ibge 7 cracks appeared to be very tight, were located in the toe O of the weld adjacent to the cladding and, were aligned in the direction of the weld.

4 (6) The fillets of the tube welds appeared to be undersized in various locations. A throat size of 1. 5 T is required for this joint where T is nominally . 050 inches, the tube wall thickness.

(7) Inspection of the fillet weld joining the opposite end of the flow divider plate to the steam generator wall indicated no apparent dJfects.

(8) The divider plate is located significantly closer to the first row of tubes in the cold leg of the A generator than to the O first row of tubes in the hot leg of this generator.

111. Post Inspection, Discussions, and Observations In the late afternoon a meeting was held between Mr. Kirkpatrick, myself and personnel from CP and L, Westinghouse and Ebasco as indicated by the attached meeting list. The personnel shown on this list had participated during the morning and early afternoon of June 18 in a closed meeting to review the cause of the problem and proposed repair procedures. Ibrtinent facts brought out by our later discussions with them were as follows:

(1) During the initial manufacturing of these steam generators all processing was completed with the exception of the fillet .

weld joining the flow divider plate to the tube sheet. Prior to completing this joint, ~ the unit was stress relieved to code requirement. The final weld joining the divider plate to the-q wggigucsceyg:wm s-cms'n;;puwem m

Ibge 8 tube sheet was then performed without any subsequent stress relief.

1 Westinghouse has not arrived at final conclusions with regards to the cause of the overall problem. They will attempt to per-form a failure analysis based on samples removed during the intended repair. At this time they believe the problem is primarily related to deficiencies in the bond strength associated with the explosive cladding process (commercial process generally used is "Detaclad"). They believe that stress relief, operating stress conditions, and stress vibration considerations were not primary factors in causing this failure.

(3) Westinghouse has eliminated the explosion cladding process

{} based on numerous difficulties which they have experienced with obtaining consistent bond strengths. They have reverted back to conventional arc fusion cladding techniques.

(4) Westinghouse reported that the worst stress condition which they believe the A generator had been subjected to was a one-time hydrotest subjecting it to 3106 pmnds on the chamber side.

They believe this resulted in a 40,000 psi stress in the divider plate and consequently a 20,000 psi stress on the cladding.

i Although they have experienced widely varying bond strengths in the explosion clad tube sheet (reportedly ranging from j 30,000 to 50,000 psi), they are not able at this time to determine O L n

R M N waysi N m use m 7snmymrra m e=cwnerrmmw - m . .

Page 9

whether or not the hydrotest performed initiated the failure.

l Q (5) Westinghouse stated that no serious problems are anticipated related to boric acid attack resulting from the leakage which  ;

4 had occurred. They furthermore indicated that stress corrosion

  • i

) and hydrogen cracking problems will not arise.

(6) When asked about the adequacy of their stress analysis of this i

vessel Westinghouse replied that they are currently undertaking i

a thorough re-study of this subject.

(7) When questioned with regards to the anticipated life of a repaired vessel, Westinghouse replied that they believe the repair will eliminate the defective areas and perform in a service manner so that reoccurrence of the problem is precluded. It was iO admitted, however, that a more complete answer to this question would be forthcoming when the failure analysis and factual reasons for the cause of the problem have been determined.

(8) Westinghouse personnel stated they do not have sufficient infor-mation at this time to determine the generic nature of the problem;

however, it is their belief at this time that it is not widespread.

No data or information was presented at this time to substantiate this opinion.

i I (9) Ultrasonic inspection by Westinghouse of the hot leg of the A generator has confirmed that separation has occurred between the cladding and tube sheet. Although there is no visual con--

1. - firmation of cracking in this location, it is suspected that a cracking condition does exist.

A 5 i g gh ' ,. By ""O '

Page 10 (10) A repair procedure proposed by Westinghouse was described Q to us. The following repair considerations were discussed:

(a) A minimum amount of material, including the fillet welds, be removed from the divider plate.

(b) Defectively bonded cladding will be removed by are and grinding methods.

(c) Attempts will be made to utilize the removed material as the basis for a failure analysis study to implement a more thorough understanding of the cause of the basic problem.

(d) The tube sheet will be re-clad using shielded metal arc (coated electrodes) techniques and the cracked tubes (3 will be ground back and permanently blocked off by v

seal-welding.

(e) The repaired region will be locally stress relieved at 1000 F prior to accomplishing the final weld between the flow divider plate and the tube sheet.

(f) The final divider plate to tube sheet weld would then be performed without any subsequent stress relieving.

(g) Inspection procedures planned were to perform penetrant testing to thecode requirements. When asked if that was the only non-destructive testing to be performed, it was stated that supplementary ultrasonic testing will be used  !

/

I i

?

%wi%itmm= swrw9meTwc5zDcx= - - ~ - ~ ~ ~

Rige 11 at their discretion to assure adequacy of the repair.

>/

D/k$ O Dr. St niey Weiss Wisconsin P. E.11316 O

O h

i i

fggg -$"B{T379477 7 7%iG~o'i?:9.MILW93*Mastartestagry-w.p.:y=pggwme.i '

m U-C ?c. : ST: lM CI_C:d?OR 22?,'.I R MV 'XG June la, 1971 N. B. Bessac CP&L W. W. Lowe CP&L B, n. Webster CP&L C. M. Clark CF6L G. .P. Beatty, Jr. CP&L W. J. Fretague Ebasco Services, Inc.

R. E. Cantrell Westinghouse, Tempa F. K. Shealy Westinghouse, Atlanta O\ ./ A. Ichmeier Westinghouse, Tampa R. F. Lehr Westinghouse, PWRSD W. Beers Westinghouse, Tampa

'- S. Wismer Westinghouse,. Tampa C.'J. "Clete" Weber ,

Westinghouse, Tampa W. M. Byerley Westinghouse, Tampa C. V. Burleson Westinghouse, Raleigh F. X. Brown Westinghouse, Tampa h'

a

! <I' QJ

@"gM. 7#4T8('wrT #AWWE"J1r-"r385*7FJ'5't"**

s- *m +""~""

_ __ .w.;.m<m.m.- ,gw -# -.

O i

'~

w _ -_

s -

\

TUB E_ ,

BUNDLE -

),

TUBE 8 PLATE '

.Q

~

's

(]~ y gi "j.

x:/

_D/ V/DEQ

x -

N && E //Q. 2 FOR ENLARGFD DE TAIL

FI G. /

'A S ream GEMERA TOR REPORT DC-89

,- CodT A T(t/-/) /GS8, TASKA L EAKS $ CRACKS IM ~

"A " STEAW1 G6HERATOR H.B. ROB /WSO4 H. ,

B 4': D.6. G/23/7/.  !

l lODx.050 WALL

, 708E3 MW. - Mo. STL. fog.qiNG

~ (A STM - A 33G) fCODE CASE /3GG Pdk)

WE S T/MGHOUSE I

I l / / / ,' /

/ ' ' -'

j' ,i

,' ,/ ,

/ / / /  ! L j' -

4x j

\ '

\ {\ N _

\ \-3 .

r TUBE DAMAGE AT THIS POINT /

// ,

INCoMEL WEL D

,/

l'

/ \s M&TA L-

/

A.. &J .A. .. FL ow Div'DEe.

n h INCONE t- PL A TE L .3

( A S TN1- 8 /66) foe View 'A -K 666 # /G. d f/G.2 ENL AggED_ Vf& W of cad o s epdEAI! ON. ..

RipoRT DC-89 cod 7 A T(t/ /)* /GS8, 7AskA 0 l EAKS d CRACKS IN "A "3 TEANI QEWERATOR H e. Roeutsoa.zt 8YLD #

9A5h/_

g o., c _ u om,, - m . .._ - _ - - - =

i O

l

)

~ .  : _p~-

\ ,

/

/} ,

i llf j \ . -- l

/ ,/

/

Ql /

i e APP @OX. . 03 Q 70 .050 \ /

N f_D_k _ Q R A C d 6 I N ~.

,5-FIL LEI _ WRLDss A ppeot.

3EWi/- C/2CUL. AR QH THE L)!

s i\I

/

' ' ..O

~

3/DE OF WELDS FACidG / ,

THE FL OW D /V/ DER  !

Pl A TE.

APPROX. 005 To .O/O Wide ceAcxs za (il . .

. ) __ ,

CL ADDING _dPPRO X. 1  !

/

O N_ t 0 5. TU B E D- -

Ex Te@!dG THE l /

EMT/RE LGTH. -

l BE TWEED' TUBES. ~

) 7 ,-

,+- /

l

~

/ ~ .

ENE M&W 'A - A_..

F20W1 f/Q. 2 4?EPOR T DC-89

~

, [OdI- A7(//-1) /G.54 Task A LL A<S $ CRA CKS Zd "A "372AW1 G&dERATOR

- A.B.EO8!!!SPN .E I 4G DL J/MP/

=;