|
---|
Category:CONTRACTED REPORT - RTA
MONTHYEARML20203K4121998-02-28028 February 1998 H. B. ROBINSON-2 Pressure Vessel Benchmark ML20236B8051989-03-13013 March 1989 Monthly Progress Rept for Contract NRC-02-87-004 for Period 890204-890303.Financial Data Available in Central Files ML20237J1411987-08-17017 August 1987 Facility Sys Analysis Support, Progress Rept 23 for 870713 -0807 ML20211N5031987-01-0909 January 1987 Reactor Trip Sys Reliability Conformance to Item 4.5.2 of Generic Ltr 83-28,HB Robinson Steam Electric Plant,Unit 2, Salem Generating Station Units 1 & 2,Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Unit 1..., Technical Evaluation Rept ML20210M4571986-09-30030 September 1986 Lepricon Analysis of Pressure Vessel Surveillance Dosimetry Inserted Into H.B. ROBINSON-2 During Cycle 9 ML20215M2351986-08-21021 August 1986 Errata to NUREG/CR-4439, Lepricon Analysis of Pressure Vessel Surveillance Dosimetry Inserted Into Hb Robinson-2 During Cycle 2, Correcting Pages ML20140G6501985-12-31031 December 1985 Review of RELAP5 Calculations for H.B. Robinson Unit 2 Pressurized Thermal Shock Study ML20151U3481985-10-15015 October 1985 Comparison of Plant-Specific Analyses of Pressurized Thermal Shock (Based on Oconee,Calvert Cliffs & Hb Robinson), Technical Ltr Rept ML20137M6621985-09-30030 September 1985 Pressurized Thermal Shock Evaluation of the H.B. Robinson Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant ML20138J9491985-09-30030 September 1985 Conformance to Generic Ltr 83-28,Items 3.1.3 & 3.2.3, Farley Units 1 & 2,Turkey Point Units 3 & 4,Robinson Unit 2 & Summer Unit 1 ML20140C5621985-09-30030 September 1985 Pressurized Thermal Shock Evaluation of the H.B. Robinson Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant ML20128M0201985-07-31031 July 1985 THERMAL-HYDRAULIC Analyses of Overcooling Sequences for the H.B. Robinson Unit 2 Pressurized Thermal Shock Study ML20126D0541985-04-30030 April 1985 RELAP5 THERMAL-HYDRAULIC Analyses of Pressurized Thermal Shock Sequences for H.B. Robinson Unit 2 Pressurized Water Reactor ML20116C4531985-04-15015 April 1985 Evaluation of Detailed Control Room Design Review Program Plan for Hb Robinson Steam Electric Plant,Unit 2 ML20112H7951984-12-26026 December 1984 Draft Chapter 5, Pressurized Thermal Shock Evaluation of Hb Robinson Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant, Re Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Analysis of Potential Overcooling Sequences ML20101Q3211984-11-21021 November 1984 Draft Chapter 3, Development of Overcooling Sequences for Hb Robinson Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant. to Pressurized Thermal Shock Evaluation of Hb Robinson Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant ML20101Q3081984-11-20020 November 1984 Draft App B, Pressurized Thermal Shock (PTS) Initiating Event Frequency & Branch Probability Screening Estimates for Hb Robinson Unit 2 Nuclear Power Station, to PTS Evaluation of Hb Robinson Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant ML20106A6571984-07-31031 July 1984 Inservice Insp Program Technical Evaluation Rept ML20091J5591984-05-0707 May 1984 Control of Heavy Loads (C-10),CP&L,HB Robinson Unit 2, Technical Evaluation Rept ML20077R5531983-08-31031 August 1983 Concentration and Distribution of Copper in Effluents from the H.B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant ML20080E0391983-05-31031 May 1983 Generator Overfill Transient Failure Mode & Effects Analysis & Rejected Sys Justification Rept, Preliminary Rept ML20080E0601983-05-31031 May 1983 Overcooling Transient Failure Mode & Effects Analysis & Rejected Sys Justification Rept, Preliminary Rept ML20126E9941982-12-0707 December 1982 Containment Leak Rate Testing Investigations, Monthly Progress Rept for Nov 1982 ML20070D1221982-11-30030 November 1982 Concentrations of COPPER-BINDING Proteins in Livers of Bluegills from the Cooling Lake at the H.B. Robinson Nuclear Power Station ML20066G3171982-11-18018 November 1982 PWR Main Steam Line Break W/Continued Feedwater Addition (B-69),HB Robinson Unit 2, Technical Evaluation Rept ML20077K0291982-09-30030 September 1982 Inservice Insp Program, Technical Evaluation Rept ML20023B0131982-08-31031 August 1982 Tech Specs for Redundant DHR Capability,Hb Robinson Steam Electric Plant,Unit 2. ML20028C6191982-07-31031 July 1982 Evaluation of Failed Reactor Coolant Pump Internal Bolts from Hb Robinson Nuclear Power Station, Informal Rept ML20079G5031982-07-0808 July 1982 Review of Licensee Resolution of Outstanding Issues from NRC Equipment Environ Qualification Safety Evaluation Repts (F-11 & B-60), Technical Evaluation Rept ML20079F2921982-03-31031 March 1982 Override & Reset of Control Ciruitry in Ventilation/Purge Isolation & Other ESF Sys,Hb Robinson Unit 2, Technical Evaluation Rept ML20052D0181982-02-28028 February 1982 Tech Specs for Redundant Decay Heat Removal Capability,Hb Robinson Steam Electric Plant,Unit 2, Preliminary Technical Evaluation Rept ML14190A6291981-07-28028 July 1981 Containment Leakage Rate Testing. ML19309C6161980-02-29029 February 1980 Electrical,Instrumentation & Control Aspects of Proposed Tech Specs Change Re Blocking of Safety Injection Signals When Pressure Is Below 2000 Psig, Technical Evaluation Rept ML20086C3771971-06-23023 June 1971 Rept on Insp of Leaks & Cracks in (a) Steam Generator at Hb Robinson II ML20087B9581971-06-23023 June 1971 Rept on Insp of Leaks & Cracks in (a) Steam Generator at Hb Robinson II ML20086B5241970-07-10010 July 1970 Stress Analysis of Modified Main Steam Safety Valve Nozzle & Adjacent Steamline ML20086B5731970-05-23023 May 1970 Rept on Design & Stress Evaluation of Failed Main Steam Safety Valve Nozzle 1998-02-28
[Table view] Category:QUICK LOOK
MONTHYEARML20203K4121998-02-28028 February 1998 H. B. ROBINSON-2 Pressure Vessel Benchmark ML20236B8051989-03-13013 March 1989 Monthly Progress Rept for Contract NRC-02-87-004 for Period 890204-890303.Financial Data Available in Central Files ML20237J1411987-08-17017 August 1987 Facility Sys Analysis Support, Progress Rept 23 for 870713 -0807 ML20211N5031987-01-0909 January 1987 Reactor Trip Sys Reliability Conformance to Item 4.5.2 of Generic Ltr 83-28,HB Robinson Steam Electric Plant,Unit 2, Salem Generating Station Units 1 & 2,Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Unit 1..., Technical Evaluation Rept ML20210M4571986-09-30030 September 1986 Lepricon Analysis of Pressure Vessel Surveillance Dosimetry Inserted Into H.B. ROBINSON-2 During Cycle 9 ML20215M2351986-08-21021 August 1986 Errata to NUREG/CR-4439, Lepricon Analysis of Pressure Vessel Surveillance Dosimetry Inserted Into Hb Robinson-2 During Cycle 2, Correcting Pages ML20140G6501985-12-31031 December 1985 Review of RELAP5 Calculations for H.B. Robinson Unit 2 Pressurized Thermal Shock Study ML20151U3481985-10-15015 October 1985 Comparison of Plant-Specific Analyses of Pressurized Thermal Shock (Based on Oconee,Calvert Cliffs & Hb Robinson), Technical Ltr Rept ML20137M6621985-09-30030 September 1985 Pressurized Thermal Shock Evaluation of the H.B. Robinson Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant ML20138J9491985-09-30030 September 1985 Conformance to Generic Ltr 83-28,Items 3.1.3 & 3.2.3, Farley Units 1 & 2,Turkey Point Units 3 & 4,Robinson Unit 2 & Summer Unit 1 ML20140C5621985-09-30030 September 1985 Pressurized Thermal Shock Evaluation of the H.B. Robinson Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant ML20128M0201985-07-31031 July 1985 THERMAL-HYDRAULIC Analyses of Overcooling Sequences for the H.B. Robinson Unit 2 Pressurized Thermal Shock Study ML20126D0541985-04-30030 April 1985 RELAP5 THERMAL-HYDRAULIC Analyses of Pressurized Thermal Shock Sequences for H.B. Robinson Unit 2 Pressurized Water Reactor ML20116C4531985-04-15015 April 1985 Evaluation of Detailed Control Room Design Review Program Plan for Hb Robinson Steam Electric Plant,Unit 2 ML20112H7951984-12-26026 December 1984 Draft Chapter 5, Pressurized Thermal Shock Evaluation of Hb Robinson Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant, Re Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Analysis of Potential Overcooling Sequences ML20101Q3211984-11-21021 November 1984 Draft Chapter 3, Development of Overcooling Sequences for Hb Robinson Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant. to Pressurized Thermal Shock Evaluation of Hb Robinson Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant ML20101Q3081984-11-20020 November 1984 Draft App B, Pressurized Thermal Shock (PTS) Initiating Event Frequency & Branch Probability Screening Estimates for Hb Robinson Unit 2 Nuclear Power Station, to PTS Evaluation of Hb Robinson Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant ML20106A6571984-07-31031 July 1984 Inservice Insp Program Technical Evaluation Rept ML20091J5591984-05-0707 May 1984 Control of Heavy Loads (C-10),CP&L,HB Robinson Unit 2, Technical Evaluation Rept ML20077R5531983-08-31031 August 1983 Concentration and Distribution of Copper in Effluents from the H.B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant ML20080E0391983-05-31031 May 1983 Generator Overfill Transient Failure Mode & Effects Analysis & Rejected Sys Justification Rept, Preliminary Rept ML20080E0601983-05-31031 May 1983 Overcooling Transient Failure Mode & Effects Analysis & Rejected Sys Justification Rept, Preliminary Rept ML20126E9941982-12-0707 December 1982 Containment Leak Rate Testing Investigations, Monthly Progress Rept for Nov 1982 ML20070D1221982-11-30030 November 1982 Concentrations of COPPER-BINDING Proteins in Livers of Bluegills from the Cooling Lake at the H.B. Robinson Nuclear Power Station ML20066G3171982-11-18018 November 1982 PWR Main Steam Line Break W/Continued Feedwater Addition (B-69),HB Robinson Unit 2, Technical Evaluation Rept ML20077K0291982-09-30030 September 1982 Inservice Insp Program, Technical Evaluation Rept ML20023B0131982-08-31031 August 1982 Tech Specs for Redundant DHR Capability,Hb Robinson Steam Electric Plant,Unit 2. ML20028C6191982-07-31031 July 1982 Evaluation of Failed Reactor Coolant Pump Internal Bolts from Hb Robinson Nuclear Power Station, Informal Rept ML20079G5031982-07-0808 July 1982 Review of Licensee Resolution of Outstanding Issues from NRC Equipment Environ Qualification Safety Evaluation Repts (F-11 & B-60), Technical Evaluation Rept ML20079F2921982-03-31031 March 1982 Override & Reset of Control Ciruitry in Ventilation/Purge Isolation & Other ESF Sys,Hb Robinson Unit 2, Technical Evaluation Rept ML20052D0181982-02-28028 February 1982 Tech Specs for Redundant Decay Heat Removal Capability,Hb Robinson Steam Electric Plant,Unit 2, Preliminary Technical Evaluation Rept ML14190A6291981-07-28028 July 1981 Containment Leakage Rate Testing. ML19309C6161980-02-29029 February 1980 Electrical,Instrumentation & Control Aspects of Proposed Tech Specs Change Re Blocking of Safety Injection Signals When Pressure Is Below 2000 Psig, Technical Evaluation Rept ML20086C3771971-06-23023 June 1971 Rept on Insp of Leaks & Cracks in (a) Steam Generator at Hb Robinson II ML20087B9581971-06-23023 June 1971 Rept on Insp of Leaks & Cracks in (a) Steam Generator at Hb Robinson II ML20086B5241970-07-10010 July 1970 Stress Analysis of Modified Main Steam Safety Valve Nozzle & Adjacent Steamline ML20086B5731970-05-23023 May 1970 Rept on Design & Stress Evaluation of Failed Main Steam Safety Valve Nozzle 1998-02-28
[Table view] Category:ETC. (PERIODIC
MONTHYEARML20203K4121998-02-28028 February 1998 H. B. ROBINSON-2 Pressure Vessel Benchmark ML20236B8051989-03-13013 March 1989 Monthly Progress Rept for Contract NRC-02-87-004 for Period 890204-890303.Financial Data Available in Central Files ML20237J1411987-08-17017 August 1987 Facility Sys Analysis Support, Progress Rept 23 for 870713 -0807 ML20211N5031987-01-0909 January 1987 Reactor Trip Sys Reliability Conformance to Item 4.5.2 of Generic Ltr 83-28,HB Robinson Steam Electric Plant,Unit 2, Salem Generating Station Units 1 & 2,Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Unit 1..., Technical Evaluation Rept ML20210M4571986-09-30030 September 1986 Lepricon Analysis of Pressure Vessel Surveillance Dosimetry Inserted Into H.B. ROBINSON-2 During Cycle 9 ML20215M2351986-08-21021 August 1986 Errata to NUREG/CR-4439, Lepricon Analysis of Pressure Vessel Surveillance Dosimetry Inserted Into Hb Robinson-2 During Cycle 2, Correcting Pages ML20140G6501985-12-31031 December 1985 Review of RELAP5 Calculations for H.B. Robinson Unit 2 Pressurized Thermal Shock Study ML20151U3481985-10-15015 October 1985 Comparison of Plant-Specific Analyses of Pressurized Thermal Shock (Based on Oconee,Calvert Cliffs & Hb Robinson), Technical Ltr Rept ML20137M6621985-09-30030 September 1985 Pressurized Thermal Shock Evaluation of the H.B. Robinson Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant ML20138J9491985-09-30030 September 1985 Conformance to Generic Ltr 83-28,Items 3.1.3 & 3.2.3, Farley Units 1 & 2,Turkey Point Units 3 & 4,Robinson Unit 2 & Summer Unit 1 ML20140C5621985-09-30030 September 1985 Pressurized Thermal Shock Evaluation of the H.B. Robinson Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant ML20128M0201985-07-31031 July 1985 THERMAL-HYDRAULIC Analyses of Overcooling Sequences for the H.B. Robinson Unit 2 Pressurized Thermal Shock Study ML20126D0541985-04-30030 April 1985 RELAP5 THERMAL-HYDRAULIC Analyses of Pressurized Thermal Shock Sequences for H.B. Robinson Unit 2 Pressurized Water Reactor ML20116C4531985-04-15015 April 1985 Evaluation of Detailed Control Room Design Review Program Plan for Hb Robinson Steam Electric Plant,Unit 2 ML20112H7951984-12-26026 December 1984 Draft Chapter 5, Pressurized Thermal Shock Evaluation of Hb Robinson Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant, Re Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Analysis of Potential Overcooling Sequences ML20101Q3211984-11-21021 November 1984 Draft Chapter 3, Development of Overcooling Sequences for Hb Robinson Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant. to Pressurized Thermal Shock Evaluation of Hb Robinson Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant ML20101Q3081984-11-20020 November 1984 Draft App B, Pressurized Thermal Shock (PTS) Initiating Event Frequency & Branch Probability Screening Estimates for Hb Robinson Unit 2 Nuclear Power Station, to PTS Evaluation of Hb Robinson Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant ML20106A6571984-07-31031 July 1984 Inservice Insp Program Technical Evaluation Rept ML20091J5591984-05-0707 May 1984 Control of Heavy Loads (C-10),CP&L,HB Robinson Unit 2, Technical Evaluation Rept ML20077R5531983-08-31031 August 1983 Concentration and Distribution of Copper in Effluents from the H.B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant ML20080E0391983-05-31031 May 1983 Generator Overfill Transient Failure Mode & Effects Analysis & Rejected Sys Justification Rept, Preliminary Rept ML20080E0601983-05-31031 May 1983 Overcooling Transient Failure Mode & Effects Analysis & Rejected Sys Justification Rept, Preliminary Rept ML20126E9941982-12-0707 December 1982 Containment Leak Rate Testing Investigations, Monthly Progress Rept for Nov 1982 ML20070D1221982-11-30030 November 1982 Concentrations of COPPER-BINDING Proteins in Livers of Bluegills from the Cooling Lake at the H.B. Robinson Nuclear Power Station ML20066G3171982-11-18018 November 1982 PWR Main Steam Line Break W/Continued Feedwater Addition (B-69),HB Robinson Unit 2, Technical Evaluation Rept ML20077K0291982-09-30030 September 1982 Inservice Insp Program, Technical Evaluation Rept ML20023B0131982-08-31031 August 1982 Tech Specs for Redundant DHR Capability,Hb Robinson Steam Electric Plant,Unit 2. ML20028C6191982-07-31031 July 1982 Evaluation of Failed Reactor Coolant Pump Internal Bolts from Hb Robinson Nuclear Power Station, Informal Rept ML20079G5031982-07-0808 July 1982 Review of Licensee Resolution of Outstanding Issues from NRC Equipment Environ Qualification Safety Evaluation Repts (F-11 & B-60), Technical Evaluation Rept ML20079F2921982-03-31031 March 1982 Override & Reset of Control Ciruitry in Ventilation/Purge Isolation & Other ESF Sys,Hb Robinson Unit 2, Technical Evaluation Rept ML20052D0181982-02-28028 February 1982 Tech Specs for Redundant Decay Heat Removal Capability,Hb Robinson Steam Electric Plant,Unit 2, Preliminary Technical Evaluation Rept ML14190A6291981-07-28028 July 1981 Containment Leakage Rate Testing. ML19309C6161980-02-29029 February 1980 Electrical,Instrumentation & Control Aspects of Proposed Tech Specs Change Re Blocking of Safety Injection Signals When Pressure Is Below 2000 Psig, Technical Evaluation Rept ML20086C3771971-06-23023 June 1971 Rept on Insp of Leaks & Cracks in (a) Steam Generator at Hb Robinson II ML20087B9581971-06-23023 June 1971 Rept on Insp of Leaks & Cracks in (a) Steam Generator at Hb Robinson II ML20086B5241970-07-10010 July 1970 Stress Analysis of Modified Main Steam Safety Valve Nozzle & Adjacent Steamline ML20086B5731970-05-23023 May 1970 Rept on Design & Stress Evaluation of Failed Main Steam Safety Valve Nozzle 1998-02-28
[Table view] Category:TEXT-PROCUREMENT & CONTRACTS
MONTHYEARML20203K4121998-02-28028 February 1998 H. B. ROBINSON-2 Pressure Vessel Benchmark ML20236B8051989-03-13013 March 1989 Monthly Progress Rept for Contract NRC-02-87-004 for Period 890204-890303.Financial Data Available in Central Files ML20237J1411987-08-17017 August 1987 Facility Sys Analysis Support, Progress Rept 23 for 870713 -0807 ML20211N5031987-01-0909 January 1987 Reactor Trip Sys Reliability Conformance to Item 4.5.2 of Generic Ltr 83-28,HB Robinson Steam Electric Plant,Unit 2, Salem Generating Station Units 1 & 2,Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Unit 1..., Technical Evaluation Rept ML20210M4571986-09-30030 September 1986 Lepricon Analysis of Pressure Vessel Surveillance Dosimetry Inserted Into H.B. ROBINSON-2 During Cycle 9 ML20215M2351986-08-21021 August 1986 Errata to NUREG/CR-4439, Lepricon Analysis of Pressure Vessel Surveillance Dosimetry Inserted Into Hb Robinson-2 During Cycle 2, Correcting Pages ML20140G6501985-12-31031 December 1985 Review of RELAP5 Calculations for H.B. Robinson Unit 2 Pressurized Thermal Shock Study ML20151U3481985-10-15015 October 1985 Comparison of Plant-Specific Analyses of Pressurized Thermal Shock (Based on Oconee,Calvert Cliffs & Hb Robinson), Technical Ltr Rept ML20137M6621985-09-30030 September 1985 Pressurized Thermal Shock Evaluation of the H.B. Robinson Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant ML20138J9491985-09-30030 September 1985 Conformance to Generic Ltr 83-28,Items 3.1.3 & 3.2.3, Farley Units 1 & 2,Turkey Point Units 3 & 4,Robinson Unit 2 & Summer Unit 1 ML20140C5621985-09-30030 September 1985 Pressurized Thermal Shock Evaluation of the H.B. Robinson Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant ML20128M0201985-07-31031 July 1985 THERMAL-HYDRAULIC Analyses of Overcooling Sequences for the H.B. Robinson Unit 2 Pressurized Thermal Shock Study ML20126D0541985-04-30030 April 1985 RELAP5 THERMAL-HYDRAULIC Analyses of Pressurized Thermal Shock Sequences for H.B. Robinson Unit 2 Pressurized Water Reactor ML20116C4531985-04-15015 April 1985 Evaluation of Detailed Control Room Design Review Program Plan for Hb Robinson Steam Electric Plant,Unit 2 ML20112H7951984-12-26026 December 1984 Draft Chapter 5, Pressurized Thermal Shock Evaluation of Hb Robinson Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant, Re Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Analysis of Potential Overcooling Sequences ML20101Q3211984-11-21021 November 1984 Draft Chapter 3, Development of Overcooling Sequences for Hb Robinson Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant. to Pressurized Thermal Shock Evaluation of Hb Robinson Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant ML20101Q3081984-11-20020 November 1984 Draft App B, Pressurized Thermal Shock (PTS) Initiating Event Frequency & Branch Probability Screening Estimates for Hb Robinson Unit 2 Nuclear Power Station, to PTS Evaluation of Hb Robinson Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant ML20106A6571984-07-31031 July 1984 Inservice Insp Program Technical Evaluation Rept ML20091J5591984-05-0707 May 1984 Control of Heavy Loads (C-10),CP&L,HB Robinson Unit 2, Technical Evaluation Rept ML20077R5531983-08-31031 August 1983 Concentration and Distribution of Copper in Effluents from the H.B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant ML20080E0391983-05-31031 May 1983 Generator Overfill Transient Failure Mode & Effects Analysis & Rejected Sys Justification Rept, Preliminary Rept ML20080E0601983-05-31031 May 1983 Overcooling Transient Failure Mode & Effects Analysis & Rejected Sys Justification Rept, Preliminary Rept ML20126E9941982-12-0707 December 1982 Containment Leak Rate Testing Investigations, Monthly Progress Rept for Nov 1982 ML20070D1221982-11-30030 November 1982 Concentrations of COPPER-BINDING Proteins in Livers of Bluegills from the Cooling Lake at the H.B. Robinson Nuclear Power Station ML20066G3171982-11-18018 November 1982 PWR Main Steam Line Break W/Continued Feedwater Addition (B-69),HB Robinson Unit 2, Technical Evaluation Rept ML20077K0291982-09-30030 September 1982 Inservice Insp Program, Technical Evaluation Rept ML20023B0131982-08-31031 August 1982 Tech Specs for Redundant DHR Capability,Hb Robinson Steam Electric Plant,Unit 2. ML20028C6191982-07-31031 July 1982 Evaluation of Failed Reactor Coolant Pump Internal Bolts from Hb Robinson Nuclear Power Station, Informal Rept ML20079G5031982-07-0808 July 1982 Review of Licensee Resolution of Outstanding Issues from NRC Equipment Environ Qualification Safety Evaluation Repts (F-11 & B-60), Technical Evaluation Rept ML20079F2921982-03-31031 March 1982 Override & Reset of Control Ciruitry in Ventilation/Purge Isolation & Other ESF Sys,Hb Robinson Unit 2, Technical Evaluation Rept ML20052D0181982-02-28028 February 1982 Tech Specs for Redundant Decay Heat Removal Capability,Hb Robinson Steam Electric Plant,Unit 2, Preliminary Technical Evaluation Rept ML14190A6291981-07-28028 July 1981 Containment Leakage Rate Testing. ML19309C6161980-02-29029 February 1980 Electrical,Instrumentation & Control Aspects of Proposed Tech Specs Change Re Blocking of Safety Injection Signals When Pressure Is Below 2000 Psig, Technical Evaluation Rept ML20086C3771971-06-23023 June 1971 Rept on Insp of Leaks & Cracks in (a) Steam Generator at Hb Robinson II ML20087B9581971-06-23023 June 1971 Rept on Insp of Leaks & Cracks in (a) Steam Generator at Hb Robinson II ML20086B5241970-07-10010 July 1970 Stress Analysis of Modified Main Steam Safety Valve Nozzle & Adjacent Steamline ML20086B5731970-05-23023 May 1970 Rept on Design & Stress Evaluation of Failed Main Steam Safety Valve Nozzle 1998-02-28
[Table view] |
Text
'
I !
l' f ~!
~3 Page 1 of 11
\ l .L j
+. .
+ !, '.
N- y
( ,) '
Report on
- Inspection of 1.caks and Cracks in the (A) Steam dencrator at II. B. Robinson 11 Report No. DC 89 June 23,1971 Prepared for: U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Division of Compliance AI!C Contract AT (11-1)-1658 Subcontract No.10 by: Dr. Stanley Weiss Materials Department r', University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee k(~}.)
'v through: Parameter, Inc.
Consulting Engineers Elm Grove. Wisconsin
,siii i n . . . .,,
j* ,-
i g y STANLEY'ij%
WEISS f, .
j E-11316 : 5 E
5' . ( MILWAttKEE.
. ,[ d
~
3/
. ~
)
8403090403 710617 PDR ADOCK 05000261 S PDR
,WO?&b?$$%iT552?MO5d%Y"]i~ f1'MbiMENW2iWiQ]GihiW!? %FM9 t W""'R"'~
, ,, ,. 3 ,, ,. , .-.
Page 2 ) .
s t -
1:,
i ~ , . ;
/ \
l.O i
d .
t i
s- !
I '
i . ,
! / :
1 /
[ NOTICE , r' i
{!' This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Govern- .e ,
i-ment. Neither the United States nor the f ,
United States Atomic Energy Commission, /
nor any of their employees, nor any of their ~
/ d, !
contractors, subcontractors, or their -
y ' f '.
j-employees, makes any warranty, express
,, or implied, or assumes any legal liability '
~, 6 or responsibility for the accuracy,' complete- ' ,
ness or usefulness of any information, *,y ., 'j
- O annaratu nroauct or nrocc8s oisciosca. - -'
! or represents that its use would not infringe i C <
j privately-owned rights. 7
- a .i ~'r .. i .
an t j
j'~,{ )
g, <
i
' .. i,: ; ..
/
,' 0',
y";:
i
- s.
i I
.e.
(_ _
., Q;I ,
6
.h. "
l
}f, p-;
Q[ ,
'.i" } ,
e ;p 9:k' ..1-
, . . .v .
,N' ;
. .i . . f. J.
~ , r. :
' .; p
, q. .: . .
g
.; g y w ._ _ _ __ _ 4 m enar=ca-m + , . . m. mA
' b?!(U':l
-m e 9
.y, - --
- .7 9.
~~
-?- i r r: ' r.r
.. e. , Page 3 r: -
r r ,
s '.
)_ t ,
w..-- y, 3, !
fn J ' ,
1.(
i [l .,, Distribution- r Copies: I o)
!! i * ,
iQ f r
AEC Regulatory Organization ,
Division of Compliance r r =
Techn'ical Programs - Washif.gton ,
(2)
, .. . - ; i L. Kornblith,'Jr. " - /' / r D. L. Pomeroy .
'i I f* /
] , e +'
f, Region II, Atlanta i W. C. Seidle , ,,- ( 3 )
! ; /.'1
( \; $- ~ ,
- e. ; -
lg i
fl ,-*
j i AEC Contracts Division., l , ,
3- , ,. ,
s '
Chicago Operations OfIice . (1)
+ .
t .'
H. N. Miller, T; Katisch '
f i j
PARAMETER, Inc. '! "
.4 r (1) <'
'.' t -
.i Dr. S. Weiss d'
[ ? (1)
- [
/ ' .4 M r
s
- t.
=P p ,
I n
- -~.,
..j- , %
. .s ,/
.; fi. / 'l A
~
1 , ,
o N *
..f M. ("
$[ . , ,
> t, >
. j. .j 7 -f, 3.
- j
,1. .. , 'I ,
~ ,. , ..
- .L..' is t <
.. , . [; ', t-
[
. -[
r ~,
1 u.
l is , ~l
,, ~ .b .
,.,. . -f -
.r. :
e 9,.
J.- . , l
-Ifjl.. l g rs
.J e
.l (6%g4'/dMMW94rDeiM ?M f Tr~ ' 'f ' "" * ' *""*N G" ' + -
-#"" *'~*' * * " " "~
p ...
Page 4
- 1. Discussions and Observati_ons Prior to inspection A visit was made to the II. B. Robinson 11 site by Mr. Donald Kirkpatrick of Region 11 and the writer on June 18, 1971 to review and inspect the reported leaks and cracks occurring in the A steam generator.
Prior to the inspection, discussions were held with Messrs. G. P. Beatty and R. Bessac of Carolina Power and 1 ight. We were informed that we would be allowed into the steam generator for only a limited time (approximately 12-15 minutes) because of existing conditions and their safety requirements. The following in-formation was presented to us during these inital discussions:
(1) The inconel cladding overlay was bonded to the base plate by the explosion bonding process.
(2) Continuous leaks in the form of droplets were observed in the A generator in two locations, approximately in the region of the 40th and 44 tubes, as counted from the north direction towards the south, in the row of tubes adjacent to the divider plate in the cold leg of the generator.
The C steam generator was reported to exhibit dampness but no droplet formation, whereas, the B generater was reported as dry with no apparent leaks.
(3) Ultrasonic testing performed by vesoqu>use indicated that separation had occurred at the bond interface between the cladding and the 22 inch thick tube sheet material between the rows of tubes.immediately adjacent to the divider plate f) .
'w/
s.
I -w"w P . <
y y 'rvy ..
(~')
v ()
v Page 5 in the hot and cold legs of the A generator. The bond sepa-
'> ration is believed to be extensive so as to encompass at least 80 tubes along these first rows. Ultrasonic testing further indicates that bond separation between the cladding and base plate ceases approximately at the mid-point of each of the first rows of tubes adjacent to the divider plate.
(4) Cracks were reported in the fillet welds extending through the cladding between the tubes containing the cracked fillets in the cold leg of the A generator. Approximately 20 to 30 tube fillets were reported as visually cracked.
(5) It was reported that the C generator was dry boiled whereas the A and Il generator.s were not.
{} (6) Preliminary reports indicate that Point Ileach may be ex-periencing a similar proolem although the intensity of the problem is not yet fully known.
II. Inspection of the Steam Generator Mr. Kirkpatrick and the writer were " suited-up" and proceeded to enter indi-vidually and inspect the cold leg of the A steam generator. The inspection was performed visually using a low power magnifying lens. Mr. Kirkpatrick attempted I
to photograph the conditions we observed with a 35 mm. camera using a close-up lens. The following conditions were observed during this inspection: (See Figs. 1,2 &$)
(1) Severe cracks were present in the fillet welds of approxi-l mately 30 tubes. The highest intensity of fillet cracking was l _
apparent in the region included in and surrounding the 35th i <
gr
V O O ease 6 to 45th tubes (as counted from the north towards the south).
These cracks were opened approximately . 030 to . 050 inches O
i and were approximately semi-circular on the side of the fillet welds facing the flow divider plate.
(2) Cracking in the 1/4 inch thick cladding was extensive in the region described above. These cracks were linear in the north-south direction (parallel to the divider plate) and were located approximately in line with the center of the first row of tubes. These cracks were tighter than those ob-served in the fillets and appeared to range in the vicinity of . 005 to . 010 inches wide and extended the entire length of the cladding between the cracked tubes.
(3) Rusting and corrosion products were observed in the immed-O iate vicinity of the fillet weld cracks progressing into the cladding cracks. This evidence shows that galvanic action and electrochemical corrosion has already occurred between the tube sheet material and the austenitic materials involved, through the borated solution which acted as an electrolyte.
(4) The writer visually observed a contoured region of the cladding, adjacent to the divider plate and in the vicinity of the 40th to 50th tubes that showed definite signs of having been separated from the tube sheet.
(5) Linear crack indications in the fillet weld joining the flow )
divider plate to the tube sheet cladding were observed. These (3
1
"'9gy gg' [g I '{MT*
- O O ibae 7 cracks appeared to be very tight, were located in the toc p
's of the weld adjacent to the cladding and, were aligned in the direction of the weld.
(6) The fillets of the tube welds appeared to be undersized in various locations. A throat size of 1. 5 T is required for this joint where T is nominally . 050 inches, the tube wall thickness.
(7) Inspection of the fillet weld joining the opposite end of the flow divider plate to the steam generator wall indicated no apparent defects.
(8) The divider plate is located significantly closer to the first row of tubes in the cold leg of the A generator than to the s
(l v first row of tubes in the hot leg of this generator.
Ill. Post Inspection, Discussions, and Ohservations In the late afternoon a meeting was held between Mr. Kirkpatrick, myself and personnel from CP and L, Westinghouse and Ebasco as indicated by the attached meeting list. The personnel shown on this list had participated during the morning and early afternoon of June 18 in a closed meeting to review the cause of the problem and proposed repair procedures. Pertinent facts brought out by our later discussions with them were as follows:
(1) During the initial manufacturing of these steam generators all processing was completed with the exception of the fillet weld joining the flow divider plate to the tube sheet. Prior
,. to completing this joint, the unit was stress relieved to code
_ requirement. The final wehl joining the tiivitler plate to the l
\ ,
1 Sh NSFYNikMk '-
- , = e = ga 7 - m-- _
F 7] (] nige g v v tube sheet was then performed without any subsequent stress j relief.
(2) Westinghouse has not arrived at final conclusions with regards to the cause of the overall problem. They will attempt to per-form a failure analysis based on samples removed during the intended repair. At this time they believe the problem is primarily related to deficiencies in the bond strength associated with the explosive cladding process (commercial process generally used is "Detaclad"). They believe that stress relief, operating stress conditions, and stress vibration considerations were not primary factors in causing this failure.
(3) Westinghouse has eliminated the explosion cladding process f'_-)
\ '
based on numerous difficulties which they have experienced with obtaining consistent bond strengths. They have reverted back to conventional are fusion cladding techniques.
(4) Westinghouse reported that the worst stress condition which they believe the A generator had been subjected to was a one-time hydrotest subjecting it to 3106 pcunds on the chamber side.
They believe this resulted in a 40,000 psi stress in the divider plate and consequently a 20,000 psi stress on the cladding.
Although they have experienced widely varying bond strengths in the explosion clad tube sheet (reportedly ranging from 30,0001o 50.000 psi), they are not able at this time to determine M E GiCryFDeppum m m tew u m pus-W m - - - - -
r --~~- - - - -- - -
r? .. 4: ^W ' ~
f ~- >
l E . , '
-Page 9 whether or not the hydrotest performed initiated the failure.
(5) Westinghouse stated that no serious problems are anticipated i related to boric acid attack resulting from the leakage which had occurred. They furthermore indicated that stress corrosion
- and hydrogen cracking problems will not arise.
9 (6) When asked about the adequacy of their stress analysis of this i
vessel Westinghouse replied that they are currently undertaking a thorough re-study of this subject.
(7) When questioned with regards to the anticipated life of a repaired J
vessel, Westinghouse replied that they believe the repair will eliminate the defective areas and perform m a service manner j so that reoccurrence of the problem is precluded. It was Q admitted, however, that a more complete answer to this question
' would be forthcoming when the failure analysis and factual reasons for the cause of the problem have been determined.
] , (8) Westinghouse personnel stated they do not have sufficient infor-mation at this time to determine the generic nature of the. problem;.
however, it is their belief at this time that it is not widespread.
No data or information was presented at this time to substantiate-i this opinion. -
1
. (9) Ultrasonic inspection by'. Westinghouse of the hot leg of the' A -
1-generator has confirmed that separation has occurred between the cladding and tube sheet. Although there is no visual con-
- .firmation of cracking in this location, it is suspected that a
- cracking condition does exist. .
g . i;
' -j *' 'I y!
wa sw-emn;;s:;mgwe L
! ,) n Page 10 V
(10) A repair procedure proposed by Westinghouse was described
()
to us. The following repair considerations were discussed: :
(a) A minimum amount of material, including the fillet welds, i l
l be removed from the divider plate. '
(b) Defectively bonded cladding will be removed by are and grinding methods. l 1
(c) Attempts will be made to utilize the removed material as the basis for a failure analysis study to implement a more thorough understanding of the cause of the basic problem.
(d) The tube sheet will be re-clad using shielded metal arc (coated electrodes) techniques and the cracked tubes q will be ground back and permanently blocked off by U
seal-welding.
(e) The repaired region will be locally stress relieved at 1000 F prior to accomplishing the final weld between the flow divider plate and the tube sheet.
(f) The final divider plate to tube sheet weld would then be performed without any subsequent stress relieving.
(g) Inspection procedures planned were to perform penetrant testing to thecode requirements. When asked if that was the only non-destructive testing to be performed, it was stated that supplementary ultrasonic testing will be used c.\
u e.
r Q
Q Rige 11 l
at their discretion to assure adequacy of the repair.
I 1
Dr. Stdnley Weiss i
Wisconsin P. E.11316 O
O m - nn-e-,m.n ,~ ,-.r- ,n ,- - = ,_.,nn,-
p A d O "J
l )
C't.! ST 'i.M Cd:CRA'f 0R 22P/.IR ME! NG June 18, 1971 N. B. Bessac CP&L W. W. Lowe CP&L B. H. Webster CP&L C. M. Clark CP&L G. .P. .Beatty, Jr. CP&L W. J. Fretague Ebasco Services, Inc.
R. E. Cantrell Westinghouse, Tampa F. K. Shealy Westinghouse, Atlanta
(#I . A. Lohmeier Westinghouse, Tampa R. F. Lehr Westinghouse, PWRSD W. Beers Westinghouse, Tampa.
' S. Wismer Westinghouse,'. Tampa C.~J. "Clete" Weber ,
Westinghouse, Tar..pa W. M..Byerley H2ct~nghouse, Tampa C. V. Burleson Westinghouse, Raleigh F. X. Brown Westinghouse, Tampa l
W p 8 e
[ 'N,
(.~/! l b
[WW" c<rwr=9 m.--,z . ~eMW . .TiTWgn=rn=+=,pw?' f ~ :wv r-~ ~~v~ e w -y a m ;g w > ~ w w w w w s,r - - - ~ ~ ~ ~
O
v: .
- i O O h
V
~
'~
s TUBE _ ,
BuMote ' -
Il TUBE -N
~ i t
I s ALATL
' l w I ,
Q. \\ '
N ,
'N \
V N
~
D/V/DEQ PL A TE L
's :
/
\ N 6EE f/Q. 2 FOR l .EHLARGED
_D E TA IL .
F/G./ 1 l 'A" S TEAM GENERA 7"OR l
l RbpoRT DC-89 n
COMT - A T(//-/) /GS8, 7ASK A L EAKS_c$ C2ACKS IM-Kf7EAkL9&HERA70g H.B. ROBidSod E '
BY: D.S. G/2S/7/ -
r;vv ;p.7;:,wz. : . .c .-
( ._ _. . .
r ,-
- . . . , . -,. = : a ..
o o l
)
O l 0D_L 0.5_.o WAL L rueEs MM.- MO. Sil. foeGING
~ (ASTM - A JJG) ~~ ^
fCODE CASE /3GG Pde )
WE s7tW9HodSE I
, l f
/ /_
\
/ \
/ / w/
\'
. 'N \ \'d >4,
/[ ,
/ / "
8 lruseosasof AT THIS POINr
,/ <
/ INCONEL WELD w '
META L "A"
h a "A" L Flow DiviDae INCONEL PL A TE L J
( AS TM- B /66)
FOR V/EW "A - A "
6EE StG. 3 f l C ,. 2.
ENL ARGED V/E W OF CLAD OEPARA TION REPORT DC-89 p LCOMT AT(t/ /) /G38, TAskA i J
LEAKS & CRACKS IN "A"6TE6M GENERATOR H B. ,208/H30W .ZE .
8 C D. S. 6/25/7/
~
. ....;g.
i W, *
- . ; s s:c j
,$LY Q h
' a.m,. *: . i:.. ,
. ? ..
a I. .. . '
- >.g -}
. p,. . J.c .,. ,kr. w;
'k r3, , i , ', .
...s.c.
y:~~..
- s ,
I+ .
l e: ,
f ,.
I
.'f.*.
.I*
,;; < - .- - .- ~ )
x
\( ~
l
.,c....
i o .~ . ,c .
. ,:w.
y . s. .
- i. ,r ; . ,
r
- . i 4:: Approx. .oso To.oso
m : -)."1. . . W/DE CRAC<3 ZN f
ftLLE T WELDJ APP 20X. f -
c%^.
i- ' - 6&WU- c/RcuL AR Od THE I!
.1
.' C. ;.. i.h y, .:rrth ~ ~ 3/DE OF WELDS SAC /WG
. n. . .
p't.oW DIVIDER '
,; ~
,K.es.w +...
' .PL A TE. -
l?: .
O .'.g *4.' , APPROX. 005 76 ,o/0 q- .
~
g...
" Wios c2 Acts ZH . . ~ 8
., *' ~ ' ~ CL ADD /^fG ~ APPRO X. .
A% -s oM @os7LIBEs -
u
~
- &s R. &M TEND /WG THE '
~ '
~.
?" ? ) . f .l. S M T / R E L G T H. < i - '
m... %.4 ~BETWEEW 7085S. '
' + ~
a .,<uc ,n. ;
y
- ':.. .:u s - .,.
_._ _. _ . . . . u .
. + , . p. 4 ;^L,. l.lc. - T ' '%
.i~~ ..og,.h l
~.
ico.-.
s, t . ,
- 3. .. -v . . ~
l isAs.. , ,* F 4 >.#r.
->^
- ,*1;. .i. q: /'k w, , ; ; - N
% . j - T . . .'g... pig _ 3
- % T&Q<._'.
.r " -
VisW 'A -A
1
. o,1. .P.' ,,, 2 <
pgov/ p/q. E 1
- 4;
, . , w.
xe . .
1
.+- b:;p.* .- .
A?spagr oc-87
'. n
.. , ... CodT-A7(il~i) M.547ASK A
% ,b . D ' . .
t.6 AK'S $ CRA CKS Zd
,,, . 3yg,,, ggg,g,794
.. d ;.x. p ' . M' 8.ROBldsod 17
'Tip & :
ayf n s. g/g,$/7/
't " e
- 'I '
,t'___
i