Letter Sequence Other |
---|
|
Results
Other: ML20054H269, ML20054H273, ML20054H276, ML20054H277, ML20077Q237, ML20077Q244, ML20077Q256, ML20081D161, ML20083K174, NLS8400199, Forwards Radiological Effluent Tech Spec Pages Clarifying Previous Submittals & Incorporating All Amends to OL Through 840601
|
MONTHYEARML20054H2771982-06-0707 June 1982 Process Control Program Project stage: Other ML20054H2731982-06-0707 June 1982 Revised Proposed Radiological Effluent Tech Specs Project stage: Other ML20054H2761982-06-0909 June 1982 Offsite Dose Assessment Manual for Assessment of Gaseous & Liquid Effluents Project stage: Other ML20054H2691982-06-0909 June 1982 Forwards Revised Proposed Radiological Effluent Tech Specs, Offsite Dose Assessment Manual & Process Control Program. Tech Specs for Instrumentation Installed Under NUREG-0737, Item II.F.1 Forthcoming Project stage: Other ML20077Q2441983-08-20020 August 1983 Proposed Revised Radiological Effluent Tech Specs Project stage: Other ML20077Q2561983-08-31031 August 1983 Offsite Dose Assessment Manual for Gaseous & Liquid Effluents Project stage: Other ML20077Q2371983-09-12012 September 1983 Forwards Revised Proposed Radiological Effluent Tech Specs (Rets),Revised Offsite Dose Assessment Manual & Response to Unresolved RETS Issues Project stage: Other ML20081D1611984-01-31031 January 1984 Offsite Dose Assessment Manual for Assessment of Gaseous & Liquid Effluents Project stage: Other ML20081D1561984-03-0707 March 1984 Proposed Change 7 to Radiological Effluent Tech Specs Project stage: Request NLS8400083, Application for Amend to License DPR-46,consisting of Proposed Change 7 to Radiological Effluent Tech Specs.W/ Offsite Dose Assessment Manual for Assessment of Gaseous & Liquid Effluents. No Fee Required1984-03-0707 March 1984 Application for Amend to License DPR-46,consisting of Proposed Change 7 to Radiological Effluent Tech Specs.W/ Offsite Dose Assessment Manual for Assessment of Gaseous & Liquid Effluents. No Fee Required Project stage: Request ML20083K1741984-04-10010 April 1984 Revised Pages to Proposed Radiological Effluent Tech Specs, Change 7 Re Automatic Containment Isolation Valves Project stage: Other ML20083K1511984-04-10010 April 1984 Application for Amend to License DPR-46,consisting of Revised Pages to Proposed Radiological Effluent Tech Specs, Change 7 & Process Control Program Project stage: Request NLS8400199, Forwards Radiological Effluent Tech Spec Pages Clarifying Previous Submittals & Incorporating All Amends to OL Through 8406011984-07-19019 July 1984 Forwards Radiological Effluent Tech Spec Pages Clarifying Previous Submittals & Incorporating All Amends to OL Through 840601 Project stage: Other 1983-09-12
[Table View] |
|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20217C7961999-10-0606 October 1999 Marked-up & Type Written Proposed TS Pages,Revising TSs 1.0, 3.6,Bases 3.0,Bases 3.6 & 5.5,to Adopt Implementation Requirements of 10CFR50,App J,Option B for Performance of Type A,B & C Containment Leakage Rate Testing ML20209A7351999-06-23023 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages 3.3-4 & 3.3-6,replacing Page 3.3-6 Re Recirculation Loop Flow Transmitters & Applicable SRs Associated with Function 2.b ML20196B4741999-06-17017 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Changes Made at Plant Subsequent to Receipt of License Amend 178,dtd 980731,for Conversion to Its,Through 990610 ML20195E9101999-06-0808 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Correcting Described Method by Which SGTS Heaters Are to Be Tested ML20205H2891999-03-31031 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Modifying ACs for Unit Staff Qualifications for Shift Supervisor,Senior Operator,Licensed Operator,Shift Technical Advisor & Radiation Manager Positions ML20236W1141998-07-28028 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Implementation of BWR Thermal Hydraulic Stability Solution ML20151Q0621998-07-28028 July 1998 Final Version of Improved TS & Bases Re Proposed Change to Conversion to Improved Standard TS ML20236R9821998-07-16016 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 6.5.1,re Implementation of BWR Thermal Hydraulic Stability Solution ML20236Q0641998-07-13013 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Rev B to Conversion to Improved STS ML20216H0801998-04-15015 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Sections 2.1.A.1.d & 3.2.C,deleting Max Rated Power for APRM Rod Block Trip Setting ML20216H0571998-04-15015 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 4.2.C,exempting Neutron Detectors from Channel Calibr Requirements ML20216B4481998-04-0202 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 4.2.C,exempting Neutron Detectors from Channel Calibr Requirements ML20148G3481997-05-30030 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing Frequency of Testing RHR Cross Tie valve,RHR-MOV-MO20,position Indication from Once Per Month to Once Per Operating Cycle ML20138J0751997-05-0505 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating Control of Standby Liquid Control Relief Valve Setpoint in TS 4.4.A.2.a & Associated Bases ML20148B0041997-05-0202 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting SLC Relief Valve Testing Described in TS Section 4.4.A.2.a & Associated Bases in Bases Section 3.4.A Since Testing Is Already Performed Under ISI Program ML20134K3771997-02-10010 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Requirements for Avoidance & Protection from Thermal Hydraulic Instabilities to Be Consistent w/NEDO-31960 & NEDO-31960,Suppl 1, BWR Owners Group Long-Term Stability Solutions.. ML20117K3291996-06-0606 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Safety Limit MCPR from 1.06 to 1.07 for Dual Recirculation Loop Operation & from 1.07 to 1.08 for Single Recirculation Loop Operation ML20100R4431996-03-0505 March 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Change Request 142, Revising TS, DG Enhancements ML20086K4421995-07-14014 July 1995 Revised Proposed Tech Specs Re DG Enhancements Reflecting More Conservative Approach to Enhancing DGs ML20086B7061995-06-28028 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Increasing Required RPV Boron Concentration & Modifying Surveillance Frequency for SLC Pump Operability Testing ML20085J2631995-06-15015 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Extension of Surveillance Intervals for Logic Sys Functional Testing for ECCS ML20083A7241995-05-0505 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Changes to TSs & Associated Bases for License DPR-46 ML20083A1341995-05-0202 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Temporary Rev to SR to Extend Two Year LLRT Interval Requirement ML20149H8821994-12-27027 December 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Control Room Emergency Filter Sys ML20078S5711994-12-22022 December 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Definition of Lco,Per GL 87-09 ML20073J2371994-09-26026 September 1994 Proposed TS LCOs 3.5.C.1 & 3.5.C.4,increasing Min Pressure at Which HPCI Sys Required to Be Operable from Greater than 113 Psig to Greater than 150 Psig ML20071K1541994-07-26026 July 1994 Proposed Tech Specs to Increase Flow Capacity of Control Room Emergency Filter System ML20070M6671994-04-26026 April 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Intermittent Operation of Hydrogen/ Oxygen Analyzers ML20065K1931994-04-12012 April 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Removal of Definitions 1.0.Z.B.1 Through 5,change to LCO 3.21.B.1.a (Line 5) Re Ref to 10CFR20.106 & Change to Paragraphs 1,4,5 & 6 (Lines 6,3,8 & 2 Respectively) Re Ref to 10CFR20.106 ML20058N2321993-12-10010 December 1993 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.21, Environ/Radiological Effluents, 6.5, Station Reporting Requirements & 6.5.1.C.2 Re 10CFR50.59(b) Rept ML20058N2881993-12-10010 December 1993 Proposed Tech Specs for Pressure Vs Temp Operating Limit Curves ML20058M2591993-09-28028 September 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Modifying Organizational Structure by Removing Mgt Positions of Site Manager & Senior Manager of Operation ML20056G5971993-08-31031 August 1993 Proposed TS Re Primary Containment Isolation Valve Tables ML20056G5821993-08-31031 August 1993 Proposed TS Re Primary & Secondary Containment Integrity ML20056G2341993-08-25025 August 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Section to Reflect Operational & Design Changes Made to CNS Svc Water Sys During 1993 Refueling Outage ML20056F3331993-08-23023 August 1993 Proposed Tech Specs 6.0, Administrative Controls, Reflecting Creation of Mgt Position of Vice President - Nuclear ML20045D8991993-06-23023 June 1993 Proposed TS SR 4.9.A.2 Re Determination of Particulate Concentration Level of Diesel Fuel Oil Storage Tanks ML20045C0031993-06-14014 June 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Associated W/Dc Performance Criteria ML20045C8301993-06-14014 June 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating New Requirements of 10CFR20 ML20128L5561993-02-12012 February 1993 Proposed TS Table 4.2.D, Min Test & Calibr Frequencies for Radiation Monitoring Sys & TS Pages 81 & 84 Re Notes for Tables 4.2.A Through 4.2.F ML20128E6201993-02-0101 February 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Current NRC Positions Re Leak Detection & ISI Schedules,Methods,Personnel & Sample Expansion,Per GL 88-01 ML20127B8331993-01-0505 January 1993 Proposed TS Pages 53,55,70 & 71,removing Bus 1A & 1B Low Voltage Auxiliary Relays ML20115F8531992-10-15015 October 1992 Proposed Tech Specs Page 48,reflecting Relocation of Mechanical Vacuum Pump Isolation SRs ML20115A3481992-10-0808 October 1992 Proposed TS Section 6.1.2 Re Offsite & Onsite Organizations, Delineating Responsibilities of Site Manager & 6.2.1.A Re Min Composition of Station Operations Review Committee ML20104B2091992-09-0909 September 1992 Proposed TS 3.1.1 Re Reactor Protection Sys Instrumentation Requirements & TS Table 3.2.D Re Radiation Monitoring Sys That Initiate &/Or Isolate Sys ML20104A8691992-09-0202 September 1992 Proposed TS 3.9 & 4.9 Re Auxiliary Electrical Sys ML20099D4151992-07-28028 July 1992 Proposed TS 3.6 Re LCO for Primary Sys Boundary & 4.6 Re Surveillance Requirements for Primary Sys Boundary ML20113G8241992-05-0404 May 1992 Proposed Tech Spec Pages for Removal of Component Lists,Per Generic Ltr 91-08 ML20096D6111992-05-0404 May 1992 Proposed Tech Specs Change 100 to Eliminate Main Steam Line Radiation Monitor Scram & Isolation Functions ML20090A8061992-02-25025 February 1992 Proposed Tech Specs Re Dc Power Sys 1999-06-08
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20217C7961999-10-0606 October 1999 Marked-up & Type Written Proposed TS Pages,Revising TSs 1.0, 3.6,Bases 3.0,Bases 3.6 & 5.5,to Adopt Implementation Requirements of 10CFR50,App J,Option B for Performance of Type A,B & C Containment Leakage Rate Testing ML20209A7351999-06-23023 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages 3.3-4 & 3.3-6,replacing Page 3.3-6 Re Recirculation Loop Flow Transmitters & Applicable SRs Associated with Function 2.b ML20196B4741999-06-17017 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Changes Made at Plant Subsequent to Receipt of License Amend 178,dtd 980731,for Conversion to Its,Through 990610 ML20195E9101999-06-0808 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Correcting Described Method by Which SGTS Heaters Are to Be Tested ML20207A0761999-05-14014 May 1999 Rev 3 to CNS Strategy for Achieving Engineering Excellence ML20206J2661999-04-22022 April 1999 CNS Offsite Dose Assessment Manual (Odam) ML20205H2891999-03-31031 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Modifying ACs for Unit Staff Qualifications for Shift Supervisor,Senior Operator,Licensed Operator,Shift Technical Advisor & Radiation Manager Positions ML20151Q0621998-07-28028 July 1998 Final Version of Improved TS & Bases Re Proposed Change to Conversion to Improved Standard TS ML20236W1141998-07-28028 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Implementation of BWR Thermal Hydraulic Stability Solution ML20236R9821998-07-16016 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 6.5.1,re Implementation of BWR Thermal Hydraulic Stability Solution ML20236Q0641998-07-13013 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Rev B to Conversion to Improved STS ML20206P9051998-07-0707 July 1998 Rev 2, Strategy for Achieving Engineering Excellence, for Cooper Nuclear Station ML20216H0571998-04-15015 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 4.2.C,exempting Neutron Detectors from Channel Calibr Requirements ML20216H0801998-04-15015 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Sections 2.1.A.1.d & 3.2.C,deleting Max Rated Power for APRM Rod Block Trip Setting ML20216D8971998-04-0808 April 1998 Rev 1 to Strategy for Achieving Engineering Excellence ML20216B4481998-04-0202 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 4.2.C,exempting Neutron Detectors from Channel Calibr Requirements ML20203G4271998-02-24024 February 1998 Rev 0 to First Ten-Year Interval Containment Insp Program for Cns ML20202H5311998-02-11011 February 1998 Strategy for Achieving Engineering Excellence ML20216G1571997-09-0505 September 1997 Rev 2.1 to Third 10-Yr Interval Inservice Insp Program ML20210H5641997-08-0707 August 1997 Rev 2 to NPPD CNS Third Interval Inservice Testing Program ML20148G3481997-05-30030 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing Frequency of Testing RHR Cross Tie valve,RHR-MOV-MO20,position Indication from Once Per Month to Once Per Operating Cycle ML20148G8531997-05-0909 May 1997 Nebraska Public Power District Nuclear Power Group Phase 3 Performance Improvement Plan, Closure Rept ML20138J0751997-05-0505 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating Control of Standby Liquid Control Relief Valve Setpoint in TS 4.4.A.2.a & Associated Bases ML20148B0041997-05-0202 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting SLC Relief Valve Testing Described in TS Section 4.4.A.2.a & Associated Bases in Bases Section 3.4.A Since Testing Is Already Performed Under ISI Program ML20138H3861997-04-29029 April 1997 Rev 1.2 to CNS Third Interval IST Program ML20134K3771997-02-10010 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Requirements for Avoidance & Protection from Thermal Hydraulic Instabilities to Be Consistent w/NEDO-31960 & NEDO-31960,Suppl 1, BWR Owners Group Long-Term Stability Solutions.. ML20134E1091996-10-25025 October 1996 NPPD Cooper Nuclear Station Third Interval IST Program, Rev 1 ML20117K3291996-06-0606 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Safety Limit MCPR from 1.06 to 1.07 for Dual Recirculation Loop Operation & from 1.07 to 1.08 for Single Recirculation Loop Operation ML20100R4431996-03-0505 March 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Change Request 142, Revising TS, DG Enhancements ML20101L8381995-12-31031 December 1995 Reactor Containment Bldg Integrated Leak Rate Test. W/ ML20113B0531995-12-29029 December 1995 Rev 4.1 to NPPD CNS Second Ten Yr Interval ISI Program for ASME Class 1,2 & 3 Components ML20093L1901995-10-18018 October 1995 Rev 0 to Third Ten-Yr Interval ISI Program for Cns ML20086K4421995-07-14014 July 1995 Revised Proposed Tech Specs Re DG Enhancements Reflecting More Conservative Approach to Enhancing DGs ML20086H7341995-07-14014 July 1995 Rev 7 to CNS Second Ten Yr Interval IST Program ML20086H7601995-06-30030 June 1995 Rev 4 to CNS Second Ten Yr Interval ISI Program for ASME Class 1,2 & 3 Components ML20086B7061995-06-28028 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Increasing Required RPV Boron Concentration & Modifying Surveillance Frequency for SLC Pump Operability Testing ML20085J2631995-06-15015 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Extension of Surveillance Intervals for Logic Sys Functional Testing for ECCS ML20083A7241995-05-0505 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Changes to TSs & Associated Bases for License DPR-46 ML20083A1341995-05-0202 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Temporary Rev to SR to Extend Two Year LLRT Interval Requirement ML20083M0401995-01-20020 January 1995 Rev 1 to Restart Readiness Program ML20083M0901995-01-13013 January 1995 Rev 2 to Startup & Power Ascension Plan ML20149H8821994-12-27027 December 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Control Room Emergency Filter Sys ML20078S5711994-12-22022 December 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Definition of Lco,Per GL 87-09 ML20083M0141994-11-0909 November 1994 Rev 3 to Phase 1 Plan, ML20083M0321994-11-0808 November 1994 Rev 0 to Restart Readiness Program ML20073J2371994-09-26026 September 1994 Proposed TS LCOs 3.5.C.1 & 3.5.C.4,increasing Min Pressure at Which HPCI Sys Required to Be Operable from Greater than 113 Psig to Greater than 150 Psig ML20149F9921994-09-15015 September 1994 Rev 1 to CNS Startup Plan ML20071K9311994-07-27027 July 1994 Diagnostic Self Assessment (DSA) Implementation Plan ML20071K1541994-07-26026 July 1994 Proposed Tech Specs to Increase Flow Capacity of Control Room Emergency Filter System ML20070M6671994-04-26026 April 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Intermittent Operation of Hydrogen/ Oxygen Analyzers 1999-06-08
[Table view] |
Text
-
- 3. All automatic containment isolation valves are operable or de-activated in the isolated position .
- 4. All blind flanges and manways are closed.
P.A Purge - Purging - Purge or Purging is the controlled process of discharging air or gas from a confinement to establish temperature, pressure, humidity, concentra-tion or other operating condition, in such a manner that replacement air or gas is required to purify the confinement.
P.B Process Control Program - The Process Control Program outlines the solidification of radioactive waste from liquid systems. It does not substitute for station operating procedures, but provides a general description of equipment, controls, and practices to be considered during waste solidification to assure solid wastes. ,
Q. Rated Power - Rated power refers to operation at a reactor power of 2381 megawatts thermal. This is also termed 100% power and is the maximum power
' level authorized by the operating license. Rated steam flow, rated coolant flow, rated neutron flux, and rated nuclear system pressure refer to the values of these parameters when the reactor is at rated power. Design power, the power to which the safety analysis applies, is 104.4% of rated power (105% of rated steam flow), which corresponds to 2486 megawatts thermal.
R. Reactor Power Operation - Reactor power operation is any operation with the mode switch in- the "Startup/ Hot Standby" or "Run" position with the reactor critical and above 1% rated pcwer.
S. Reactor Vessel Pressure - Unless otherwise indicated, reactor vessel pressures listed in the Technical Specifications are those measured by the reactor vessel steam space detectors.
T. Refueling Outage - Refueling outage is the period of time be. tween the shutdown of the unit prior to a refueling and the startup of the plant after that refueling.
IU. Safety Limits _The safety limits are limits within which the reasonable maintenance of the fuel. cladding integrity and-the reactor coolant system
~
integrity are assured. Violation of such a limit is,cause for unit shut- ,
down and_ review-by the' Nuclear Regulatory Commission before resumption of unit operation. Operation beyond such a limit may not in itself result in serious consequences but it indicates an' operational deficiency subject to regulatory, review.
.V. . ' Secondary Containment Integrity - Secondary containment' integrity means
_ that the reactor building is intact and - the following conditions are met:;
[ 1. At'least one door'in each access opening is closed.
2.. .The. standby gas treatmant system is operable.
A11' automatic ventilation system' isolation-valves are. operable or
~
3.
secured in:the isolated position.
- W., Shutdown - The reactor is'in a shutdown condition when the mode switch-is .in the " Shutdown ~ or " Refuel" ~ position.-
' 1. . ' Hot Shutdown means conditions as above with reactor coolant' Jtemperature greater than 212*F.
~
2.- ' Cold Shutdown means~ionditions as'above'with' reactor coolant
. temperature' equal to or less'than.212*F and the reactor vessel vented.1
~
7 .
~ '
8404160089~840410 0
,. -- ? - PDR-ADOCK- 05000298 ~-5--
%-.-P . - . ._PDR : y,
- ge -e m & ,-r-,y- '
t tr -4't y v --b-~*-+v 5 Y""v-- *v- -
YT*T' 'T
- Tev*-* e- 7" M*v1 *-"Pv- t v
- ee ** 9- W *w =vW-)<r v - g wv w
TABL'E 3.21.F.1 (CONTINUED)
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
- Exposure Pathway . Number of Sampling and Type and Frequency and/or Sample Sample Stations ' Collection Frequency of Analysis
- 4. Ingestion' ,
'a. Milk At least'one location At least once ger 15 days during Peak Gamma isotopic and I-131 (Nearest Pasture Period ; at least once per analysis of each sample.
Producer)' 31 days at other times,
- b. Milk- At least 2 locations At least once per 92 days.- Gamma-isotopic and I-131 (Other analysis of each sample.
Producers) b
- c. Fish .At least 2 locations Two cimes per year (once in the Gamma isotopic analysis on summer and once in the fall). edible portions.
s Attempt to include the following:
- 1. Bottcm feeding species Q '
.g- 2. Middle-Top feeding species b
d.' Food. Samples of.three dif- Monthly when available. Gamma isotopic and I-131 1 Products .ferent kinds of broad analysis.
leaf vegetation grown-nearest each of.two
.different offsite locations of. highest predicted annual
. average ground-level D/Q if milk sampling is not performed.
One sample of each of Monthly when available. Gamma isotopic and I-131 the similar broad leaf analysis.
vegetation grown 15-30
.km distant in the least prevalent wind. direction
.if milk sampling is not
. performed.-
p -
e .
NOTES FOR TABLE 3.21.F.1
- a. DELETED
- b. Ge(L1) gamma isotopic analysis refers to high resolution Ge(Li) gamma spectrum analysis as follows: the sample is scanned for gamma-ray activity. If no activity is found for a selected nuclide, the detection sens.itivity for that nuclide will be calculated using the counting time, detector efficiency, gamma energy, geometry, and detector background appropriate to the particular sample in question. The following nineteen (19) nuclides shall be analyzed for routinely:
Be-7 Ru-103 Ce-144 K-40 Ru-106 Ra-226 Mn-54
- I-131 Th-228 Fe-59 Cs-134 Co-58 Cs-137 Co-60 BaLa-140 Zn-65 Ce-141 Zr-95 Nb-95 Any radionuclide detected, i.e., ha"',3 a measured concentration greater than the LLD, whether or not it is one of the 19 nuclid o listed above, shall be regarded as present in the sample.
- c. Thermoluminescant Dosimeters (TLD) is a single phosphore. Two or more phosphores in one package are considered to be two or more dosimeters.-
- d. Peak Fasture Period is June 1 through September 30 of each year.
s'
-216a17-
. _ _ _ - _ = _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
. u 6.6 Environmental Qualification A. By no later than June 30, 1982 all safety-related electrical equipment in the facility shall be qualified in accordance with the provisions of:
Division of Operating Reactors " Guidelines for Evaluating Environmental Qualification of Class IE Electrical Equipment in Operating Reactors" (DOR Guidelines); or, NUREG-0588 " Interim Staf f Position on Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment", December 1979.
Copies of these documents are attached to Order for Modification of License DPR-46 dated October 24, 1980.
B. By no later than December 1, 1980, complete and auditible records must be available and maintained at a central location which describe the
, environmental qualification method used for all safety-related electrical equipment in sufficient detail to document the degree of compliance with the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588. Thereafter, such records should be updated and maintained current as equipment is replaced, further tested, or otherwise further qualified.
6.7 Systems Integrity Monitoring Program A program shall be established to reduce leakage from systems outside the primary containment that would or could contain highly radioactive fluids during a serious accident to as low as pracrical levels. This program shall include provisions establishing preventive maintenance and periodic visual inspection requirements, and leak testing requirements for each system at a frequency not to exceed refueling cycle intervals.
6.8 Iodine Monitoring Program
-A' program shall be established to ensure that capability to. accurately determine the airborne iodine concentration in vital areas under accident conditions. This program shall include training of personnel, procedures for monitoring and provisions for maintenance of sampling and analysis equipment.
' 6. 9. Process Control Program (PCP) 6.9.1 The PCP shall be a manual detailing the program of sampling, analysis-and formulation determination by which SOLIDIFICATION of. radioactive waste.from liquid systems is assured consistent
.vith Specification 3.21.E and-the surveillance requirements of.
these Technical Specifications.
6.9.2 District Initiated Changes .
. A. 'Shall be submitted to the Commission by inclusion in the
' Semiannual Radioactive Material Release Report for the period in which the' change (s) was made effective and shall contain:
1
- 1. Sufficiently detailed information to totally support.the' rationale for the changeJwithoutibenefit of additicnal or supplementa1'information; I: j2. . A~ determination that-the change did not-reduce'the overall conformance.of the solidified waste product'to' existing
. . criteria for' solid wastes; Land 3., Documentation,of the fact that thel
! change has been reviewed' and found acceptable by;the SORC.
B. 1Shall become effective upon, review and a'cceptance by the SORC.
-235b-
-_ _= __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - _- _-_ - _ _ __ ____- ___n
ATTACHMENT 2 PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM FOR Cooper Nuclear Station June 7, 1982 O
.o .
PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM INTRODUCTION This Process Control Program outlines the solidification of radioactive waste from liquid systems at Cooper Nuclear Station. It is not intended to be a substitute for station operating procedures, but to provide a general description of equipment, controls, and practices to be considered during waste solidification. Station operating procedures will provide detailed instructions as to the actual operation during the solidification process.
CLASSIFICATION OF TERMS This Process Control Program Document describes the process used to solidify wet wastes. Wet wastes are those wastes produced from the liquid radwaste treatmsnt system. These vastes may be typically described as spent resins (bead and powdex), filter material, waste sludges, and evaporator concentrates. The solidification of these wastes as defined is the conversion of radioactive wastes from liquid systems to a solid, which is as uniformly distributed as reasonably achievable, with definite volume and shape, bounded by a stable surface of distinct outline on all sides. The solidification of the wastes mentioned above is achieved with equipment installed at CNS and this equipment operated in accordance with CNS operating procedures. Those wastes which progress through the process system, fill, mix, and capping stations will normally meet the solidification criteria. Those wastes that deviate from the normal operation, needing special technique, such as hand-mixing, material injection by manipulator or hand, etc., will be as uniformly distributed as reasonably achievable. Keeping exposures ALARA and physical makeup of the material to be solidified will be the governing considerations in determining what is reasonably achievable.
The radwaste solidification process will be operated on a batch basis. A batch will consist of all the resulting continuous drums processed from the contents of a single source. An example would be the sludge from a condensate phase separator solidified in a continuous drumming operation until the phase separator is empty or the batch is terminated.
Radioactive vastes from liquid systems processed on a batch basis for solidification will normally be, but not limited to, the condensate phase separators, reactor water cleanup phase separators, waste sludge tank, spent resin tank, or concentrated waste tank.
OPERATION Wastes to be solidified will normally be from the condensate or reactor water cleanup phase separators, vaste eludge tank, or spent resin tank. These wastes are routed through the centrifuge units. - Af ter dewatering in the centrifuge, vastes then enter a stcrage. hopper. ' Wastes at this step will vary from a fairly ' dry granular consistency to a wet putty-like consistency depending.upon the source material; filtered sludges, filter material, resins, etc. Department of Transportation 17H . specification 55-gallon' drums containing cement are - then transferred under the hopper and filled with vastes. The drum then progresses to the mixing section.
C L w l
l The in-drum mixer mixes the cement and waste materials. Water is then added to the mixture in quantities to ensure solidification. Because of the varying degree of wetness from one batch to the next, periodic visual inspection of the first few drums is necessary to determine ene correct amount of water needed. After the amount of water to achieve soJidification has been determined, it may be added automatically by the mixing program.
After mixing has been achieved, radiation levels of each drum is taken. The drum is then transferred to the drum storage lines.
The drumming operation will be continuous, centrifuging, and drumming until the source, phase separators, or tanks are emptied or the batch terminated. '
After at least 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, the drums are taken from the storage line to the capping station. Here the drum is visually inspected for freestanding water.
If the material is solid and no freestanding water is present, the drum is capped. If it is not solidified or freestar. ding water is present, cement may have to be added or the drum is put back on the storage line to cure. After capping, the drum is washed to remove contamination. The capped drum is then taken to the storage line. Prior to shipment, the drums will be taken to the smear station and checked'for contamination levels.
The third or fourth drum of each batch will be sampled prior to the mixing station. This sample is considered representative of that batch. The sample is taken to the Radiochemistry Laboratory for analysis.
PARAMETERS AND TESTING Two cubic feet of cement will be added to each 55-gallon 17H specification d rum. It has been demonstrated that this volume of cement with the remaining drum volume being powdex resins, powdex filter material, sludges, etc., and water will achieve solidification.
After the material to be solidified has been added to the drum, a sample of this material, considered to be representative of that batch, will be taken.
This sample will be analyzed for pH. It has been demonstrated that, if the material to be solidified has a pH value within the range of 2 to 13, the solidification process will not be affected. This sample is also isotopically analyzed to determine isotope distribution. By comparing this isotopic distribution and radiation readings on each drum, the total concentration of the radionuclides present can be determined, also any carry-over from ~ the previous batch or changes in the amount of solidified material may be taken into account.
'Because of the variation in water content of the material af ter being centrifuged (dry to paste-like consistency), varying amounts of water will be added during the mixing stage. The first few drums will provide'a basis for determining the correct amount of water to be'added to each drum of the batch.
This will be done visually and with mixer torque indications. Once.the amount of water needed for solidification has been determined, this amount of water will be edded to each drum by the automatic mixing sequence controls.
At least 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> after mixing and prior to capping, each drum ~ is ' visually '
-inspected. ~ This provides assurance that no freestaading water is present and that the radwaste material has been solidified.
,. 7.w e
REPORTS The volume = and curie content of wet wast'es solidified at Cooper Nuclear Station _ will be documented in the . Station Semiannual Reports. This information will be in the format outlined in Regulatory
- Cuide 1.21 Revision 1, Table 3.
t 7
F N
$.y,-
$ 3 3;
b s
'