ML20056B985
| ML20056B985 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Monticello  |
| Issue date: | 05/31/1974 |
| From: | NORTHERN STATES POWER CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20056B984 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9105030422 | |
| Download: ML20056B985 (27) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:-- - - .. .. - .. - . . - -. -- 'l l 50 '363 i D NORIMERN STATES POWER COMPANY a l i ETICELID N0 CLEAR GENEPATING PIRE C- ~R{l . i h' OG111974w $ i
!lgpr 3 i s "p/Q an M
c REPORT TO THE UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY C0hMISSION DIRECTORATE OF LICENSING LICENSE NO. DPR - 22 i REACTOR CONTAISENT BJIIRING INTEGRATED LEAK TEST MAY 1974 4 Report Prepared by: 9105030422 740812 ADDCK 05000263 m if J R Pasch* PE CF CF M August 12, 1974 Test Conducted by: J R Pasch S350
, M F Hammer
- a. . . - . -.- .- .- - _ - - . . . , . - . - - - . . _.
i
-)
i i TABLE OF CONTEhTS PAGE
- 1. Introduction 1 l 1.1 Purpose of Containment Leakage Tests 1 l 1.2 Testing Requirements 1 1.2.1 Frequency of Testing 1 i
i 1.2.2 Test Acceptance Criteria 2 ;
+
1.2.3 Required Procedure for Lenkage Testing , 2 i
- 2. 'lest Results 2 l 2.1 Type A Test Results 2 2.2 Type B and C Test Results 2
- 3. Description of Test Procedures 2 3.1 Type A Test Procedure 2 !
3.1.1 Type A Test Instruraents and Equipnent 2 i 3.1.2 Type A Test Summary of Events 4 i
- 4. Summary of Test Calculations 5 !
4.1 Containment Volume Calculations 5 ! 4.2 Type A Calculations '6 f 4.3 Calculations for Verification of Type A Test Accuracy 8
- 5. Error Analysis 9
! 5.1 Type A Test Error Analysis 9 l
.5.2 Estimate of Type A Test Error 10 !
. 5.3 Estimate of Type A Test Verification Error. 11 l i i ! APPENDIX A - Type A Test Data and Calculation 17 , !^^ APPENDIX B - Type A Test Verification Data and Calculation 20 APPENDIX C - Type B and C Test Data and Results , 22 l - APPENDIX D - Containment Volume Test Data and Calculation 28 i e j 1, e d I h
- _ _ ._ . __ - . . _ ___ _ . . _ _ _...-_ _ _ _ . . _ . _ .~. _. !
.. _ . _ . __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. ~._ _ ,
l
~ , . )
~
- 1. Introduction ;
i 1.1 Pumose of Containment Leakage Test y , As stated in 10 CFR 50, Appendix J, primary containment leakage tests j are conducted to assure that. , i i a) leakage through tb primary reactor containment and systems and ! components penetrating primary containment shall not exceed i allowable leakage rate values as specified in the Technical 4 Specifications or associated Bases. (, j b) Periodic surveillance of reactor containment penetrations and i isolation valves is performed so that proper maintenance and
- repairs are made during the service life of the containment, and ,
j systems and components penetrating primary containment. l ! Results of containment leakage tests are' reported to the Directorate
- of Licensing, USAEC, following each periodic containment integrated i
{ 1eakage test (Type A test). This report must include. l - I 3 a) Analysis and interpretation of the Type A test results. l b) Results and analysis of the supplemental verification test employed l to demonstrate the validity of the leakage rate test measurements. l i i 1.2 Testing Requirements i i
- 1.2.1 Frequency of Testing I Type / tests are scheduled in accordance with Paragraph 4.7.A.2 (d) l
- of the hbnticello Technical Specifications. Testing is required at 1 the following intervals
i
- a) During the first refueling outage.
) b) Within 24 months of the test in (1) above. \ l c) Within 48 months of the test in (2) above and every 48 months l thereafter. In the event that any testing (local or integrated) yields a leak rate l ~ in excess of Lt =-1.2 weight percent of the contained air per 24 hours , at the test pressure P t" 41 Psig, the condition must be corrected and j the testing schedule reverts to. i l a) At the first refueling outage following the retest made (local or l ! integrated) to correct the excess leakage. ! 2 j l 3 b) Within 24 months of the test in (1) above. l c) Within 48 months of the test in (2) above and every 48 months thereafter. 1 1
A block valve was provided in the solenoid valve exhaust port and the containment was re-pressurized to 42 usig. Conditions were determined to be sufficiently stable for meaningful and consistent data by 1520. Data was logged hourly and a point-to-point calculation of leakage rate was plotted to detect possible spurious readings. At 2120 on May 14, 30 hours of usable data had been collected and the integrated containment leakage rate test was considered complete. ' The controlled bleed verification of the test accuracy was begun at 2125. At 0425 on May 15, sufficient data had been collected to verify the accuracy of the integrated leakage rate test within the allowable accuracy of 10 CFR 50, Appendix J. The containment was depressurized through the dr well 'and torus 2-inch vent lines to the Standby Gas Treat aent System. At 1715 on May 15, depressurization was compleved and the , containment was inspected. No damage was discovered.
- 4. Summarv of Test Calculations, 4.1 Containment Volume Calculations The containment volume calculation was based on detemination of pressure rise resulting from introduction of a measured quantity of air into the containment during pressurization to 42 psig. The calculation utilized the perfect gaslaw as corrected for the water vapor present.
a) Containment Volume Calculation Derivation Theinitialairdensityf1 is given by j1= M i = (P1 - Pyl) V R T1 Thefinalairdensityf2 is given by [2 = My + Ma = (P2-Pv2) 4 V RT 2 hhere
= Density - lbm/ft M = Mass - Ibm V = Volume - ft 3 R = Gas Constant - ft 3psi /lbm oR T = Average containment temperative OR
d l } l 1 ,
- i 1 P= Containment pressure - psia {
j
! Fy = Average containment vapor pressure - psia f a !
l k d As gas flow is referred to on a volume basis at a specified j
- condition Ma can be written as j Ma
- E fa ,
! Where L i ! ' 3 j Va= Gas Volume Added - ft .j 3 fa=StandardDensityat14.7psiaand519.7 R - Ibm /ft i i Combining the aforementioned equations yields the following ) equation for the containment volume ; !~ J V=[a Va l { (P2 - Pv2) - (P1-Pyg) ). I ) RT2 RT1 < J e ! Containment pressure, average vapor pressure, and average i j temperature were provided by the installed test equipment. 1 The amount of air added to the containment was determined ! over an 8 hour period while pressurizing for the integrated l 1eak rate test. A Turbo Meter and TEM Factor with a least
- i. counts readability of 1000 ft3 were used. Test data and results are presented in Appendix D.
9 l 4.2 Type A Calculations ! Each hour during the integrated cantainment leakage test and during
- the accuracy verification test, the following calculations were j
made to determine the point-to-point method leak rate. 4 ) a) Containment Absolute Pressure ! 'CONTAINMEhT PRESSURE (psia) = Pg +P PI-2 Pg = local Barometric Pressure (psia) P = Drywell Wallace Tiernan Gauge Pressure (psig) PI-2 b) Containment Average Temperature (OR) = i = 20 -
, wi ti + 459.72 1=1 wi = Weighting factor for RTDi from (tables 16 2) t i = Computer reading of RTDi $
c) Containment Average Vapor Pressure IEIQffED AVERAGE CONTAINMENT VAPOR PRESSURE (inches water) = i=6 1=1 "vi P
. y1 wyy = weighting factor for dewcel i (Tables 16 2)
Pvi = Computer reading (inches water) ~ for dewcel i d) Containment - Reference Chamber Ap CONTAINMENT - REF 0148 DIFF PRES (inches water) = h-btL Lg = Right leg level (inches) of DPI-1 I n = Left leg level (inches) of DPI-1 e) Leak Rate Calculation CONTAINMENT LEAKAGE RATE (hT%/24-HR) = 2400 7_Ty -
@P2+Pv2) APy+Pyy-T2 (Py-Pyy) Py -P yy.
Ty = Average absolute containment temperature at start of interval (OR) T3 - Average absolute containment temperature
~
at end of interval (OR) AP I = Containment-ref chamb dp at start of interval finches water) 6P 2 = Containment-ref charib dp at end of interval (inches water) Pyy = Containment vapor pressure at start of interval (inches water) Py*, = Containment vapor pressure at end..of inteinal (inches water) Py = Absolute containment pressure at start of interval (inches water) h = length of interval (hours) Derivation of the leakage rate equation may be found in ANSI N-45.4-1972, Appendix B.
1 l . The purpose of the hourly calculations was to construct a plot of point-to-point leakage rate (Figure A-1). This plot was , useful in detecting trends or possible anomalies. The actual ! containment leakage rate, however, was taken as the average of data comparisons from six 24-hour intervals. The first six hours of data following stabilization of the containment atmosphere and the last six hours of data were used for this purpose. All data and calculations for the integrated containment leak rate test are tabulated in Appendix A. 4.3 Calculations for Verification of Type A Test Accuracy seven hrs of useful data were taken with a controlled leakage rate established in addition to the nomal containment leakage rate. The integrated leakage rate test validity was established by comparing Ly' and L y, where: L'=L y c ~l o Ly= bbasured integrated leakage rate (wt %/ day) Lc= Leakage measured during controlled bleed (wt%/ day) Lg= Controlled bleed rate (wt%/ day) As described in 10 CFR 50, Appendix J, results from the controlled leak testLare acceptable provided y L ' allowl
- L,ble Lis less thanwtor%/ equal to 0.25 t
. For hbnticello with an t of 1.2 day the requirement is that Ly ' - L y6 0.3 ht %/ day.
Throttle valve R (Figure 1) was adjusted for approximately 0.28wt%/ day through the controlled bleed rotameter. Rotameter indication and actual bleed rate were related in the following manner: Lo (wt%/ day) = F Scf 14.7 1440 min 100% V P day c c F= Ibtameterindicatedflowrate = 1.0 scfm Scf= R tameter scale factor correctioii = 1.86 for air metered at Pc with 14.7 psia scale _ Pc = Average containment absolute pressure during controlled bleed = 55.70 psia Vc = Containment free air volume during testing = 247,353 ft3 Data and calculations for the verification phase of the integrated leak rate test are tabulated in Appendix B.
i '
- 5. Error Analysis {
5.1 Type A Test Error Analysis _ , The assumptions for the type A test error analysis and the ; ! derivation of the type A test error relation are as reported ,
- in the sunnary technical report submitted May 1973 entitled ,
l REACTOR C0bTTAINMENT BUILDING INTEGRATED LEAK TEST MAY 1973. , ] The estimated variance for each type A test measurement are i
! as given below:
j a) Estimate of d2 (T) i i' All temperature measurements were obtained with ALPHA-LINE l RTD transmitters connected to the plant process computer. l 4 This system has an accuracy over the range of 600 F to ; 3 170oF of at least 0.100 F. Therefore: ;
/2(ti)=(0.10)2 = 2.5 x 10-3 oR2 ;
2 l Using the weighting factors from Tables 1 and 2. i r 20 T= witi ! [ ! ? 2 -4 2 oR [ 2(T) = {2o'yiJ 2 (ti) = (6.7 x 10 ) (2.5 x 163 ) = 1.67 x 10 > i ! , f b) Estimateof[ (P) 1
! The Wallace Tiernan gauge used to measure the containment i pressure is readable to 0.012 PSIG and has a certified
- accuracy of 0.04 PSIG. The barometric pressure instrument i is readable to 0.01 INCHES and has an equivalent accuracy when corrected for temperature effects on the density of mercury and on scale distortion. The combined error is given by
2 , d2(P)=[0.012 2
+ 0.04 + (0.01) (.491) * + (0.01) (.491) g ;
i
- l. (Z Z Z Z j
-5 lI 2 I i; [2 {P) = 44.S6 x 10 Ps1 1 2
, f 2 (P) =0.3440 in H20
~
I c) Estimate of 62 (4p) ;
)
a The water filled manometer is readable to within 0.02- inches water. Considering that left and right legs of the manometer j, g had to be read gives: g2 (g p), g2 (; ) f2 (gg) j l = 2 (0.02/2)2 = 2x10~4 (inches water)2 l l 5 4 q.
-l
d) Estimate of} 2 (py) All vapor pressure measurements were obtained with Foxboro type 2701 RPG DEWCELS connected through resistance-current , converters and special RTD processing boards to the plant computer. The DEWCELS are certified to an accuracy of at least 0. 1% and the resulting system error will not exceed 0.2 - INCHES WATER vapor pressure. Therefore: 6 ) k "vi yg P 2 2 g2 f (p y), y y (p ) 4 6
*C' Wyi [ 0.22__}
3 ( i Using the weighting factors from Tables 1 and 2 i 7 4 tP y) = 1.86 x 10'3 (INCH H O)'* 2 5.2 Estimate of Type A Test Error l The overall measurement error is detemined using the individual measurement variances in 5.1 and the following parameters obtained from the test data: L 6
= 0.25198 n W y
, P = 1550.65 mehes water o P y
= 7.56 inches water N =2 4.57 inches water 4 T= 527.43 R The standard deviation becomes d'(L) = 0.00413 vt7./ day The estimated test error at the 95% confidence level is .. + 2 [(L) = 0.00331 wt7./ day 7,
Yb The validity of the error analysis can be verified by comparing each 24 hour data comparison with the interyal: f L6 ! 2 g (L) All of the data points except one fall in this range. The one point i outside the estimated interval is 0.00122 below the lower limit.
l I i
~
5.3 Estime.te of Type A Test Verification Error 1 Measurement of the combined leakage rate during verification of the accuracy of the Type A test was based on the average of seven 1 - hour data co:::parisons. The expression for estimated standard ! deviation in this case becomes: i [(Lv')= dkLc) +(b(L) o for one measurement < [s(L) c
= 24 [(L) = 24(0.0041) = 0.099 wt%/ day 1 d5(Lo) = variance in rotameter indication
=
(1% of full scale)(4.6 SCH4) Sef (1440)(100) (1/2) Vc Pe
= 0.00045 wt%/ day l +
6(L')= y (0.099)2 + (0.00045)2 for average of 7 = 0.0374 wt%/ day
\ 7 2[(Ly'). 0.0748 vt%/ day Ly' can therefore be expressed as:
Ly' = 0.1774 0.0748 at the 95% confidence level This is in agreement with the test result of 0.25198. Therefore the accuracy of the leakage measuring system is verified and the controlled leakage result is validated. 3 e4
~
l s I
P DRWELL WIDE RANGE LOITROIJ.ED BLEED . PRESSURE TRANSMI7fER ROTAMETER I I PT-7368
> \
o yR q 3
.1_
5 DRWELL r PRESSURE
- CONNECTION L .
LS-2997
-- l DRWELL FLOOD LEVEL SWITCH REFERENCE I
CHAMBER IM( DRWELL SECTION 20 FT ALL REF?aENCE CHAMBER I SECTIONE CONSTRUCTED LJ OF 2-INCE COPPER PIPE X-32 X-50E c-pc . . - REFERENCE CHAMBER - REFERENCE CFJJ4BER ,, CONNECTION VENT PIPE SECTION 15FT
/
f / I' TORUS ( SECTION
\ 15 FT a
4 FIC.1 Cresn scetion of containment vessel showing location of reference chamber and controlled bleed rotometer connection.
1 4 i i i i i i REFERENCE CHMIB Pl-I PI-2 INA3JATION MC 1LL CONNECTION (\ O-60 PSIG HELICOID f f 0-60 PSIG WALLACE TIERNAN n 1 I i r-i P B C
. j i FROM REFERENCE A D rn0x nawEu i CHAMBER CONNECTION PRESSURE CONNECTION
- FX E
G i j J s i! il a l l I; I J ! l l
. m s i 4 ,
, 2 ll*
36 IN WATER FTum U-TUBE MANOMETER I i; -- g
- 4. lI i
i4 I i I 't a r q DPI-I FIG. 2 Irrtallation details of the test manometer and pressure Eauges. A e
^~^
i 7: , l 3 : ,
;illic3Gbli VAP0FI".ER m_
PS-3 $(2 FE-32t% -.---3 Mls 9. NI v N l 1 i T- __ PRESSURE RDJ
\ ( failed open) CONTAIIE1ENT PRESSURIZATION J C O A0-2377 EQUIPMENT SKID ?
Mh FILTERS, C21 ILLER-DRYER, AND AIR COOLER
~
Pr-3283
+ -
WEST WALL OF a - REAC10R BUILDING AO-2381h
\
A0-2378 N] - i -
-]
%-ag) 750/600-SCFM Rotary AIR COMPRESORS 18-INCH 20-INCH DRWELL PURGE TORUS PURGE-LINE LINE FIG. 3 containment pressurization riow diagram.
e _ . _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ . _ _ . _ _ _ ._____________._-_m_____.____.___._____________.____.____________m __________.___._._____._m_____-____ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . _m___._______.___._
TABLE 1. DRYWELL DEWCELS AND RTD's Computer Location
- Volume Weighting Sensor Type Sensor 2. Point Elevation Arimuth Factor Dewcel 3 D534 933 0 .2158 4 D535 951 90 .2050 5 D536 966 180 .0787 6 D537 994 270 .0936 RTD 1 M523 933 0 .0537 2 M524 933 90 .0537 3 M525 933 180 .0537 4 M526 933 270 .0537 5 M527 951 0 .0513 6 M528 951 90 .0513 7 M529 951 180 .0513 8 M530 951 270' .0513 9 W564 966 0 .0198 10 W565 966 90 .0198 11 W566 966 180 .0198 12 W567 ' 966 270 .0198 13 W568 994 0 .0235 14 W569 994 90 .0235 15 W570 994 180 .0235 16 W571 994 270 .0235 TABLE 2. TORUS DEWCELS AND RTD's Computer location * ,7,1 g Sensor Troe Sensor No. Point Elevation Azimuth Factor Dewcel 1 D538 915 0 '2034 2 D539 915 180 2034 RTD 17 W572 915 0 .1017
- 18 W573 915 90 .1017 19 W574 915 180 .1017 20 W575 915 270 .1017 l
- Referenced to the dryvell floor at 920.5 ft, the torus center line at 912.5'ft, and the drywell airlock at 0 degrees.
4
-TABLE 3 TEST INSTRUMENT DATA l
Instrument Range bbnufacturer Serial Certification Dewtels -50 to 6 hhnufacturer's certification and comparisor hbt FOXBORO 270 1 RG 7 DV 248 check with a certified decade resistance box. IN 255 DV 260 DV 316 NN a g h Manufacturer's certification and comparisor Ambient check with a certified decade resistance 96693 box. , Barometer 36" Mercury MERIAM G-75731 Manufacturer's certification. PI-1 0-60 PSIG Wallace Tiernan UU-13922 Manufacturer's certification. PI-2 0-60 PSIG ACCO IELICOID 2719-0 Compared with certified test device. DPI-1 36" H 2O MERIAM NONE Manufacturer's certified scale. l Flow Rator 0-4.6 SCFM FISOER PORTER 7112 A0 997-A2 Scale verified by testing labratory. Turbo Meter 1000 SCFM ROCKWELL T-140 1000056 Manufacturer's recalibration and certi-least counto fication.
l _ . I APPENDIX A TYPE A TEST DATA AND CALCULATIONS CONFAIRHNF CONTAINMNF REF CONTAIMIENT PRESS CilAMBIR DP TEST INTUWA1 CAlfULATLD Leak AVERAGE CONTAINMENT AVG DATE TIME (PSIA) (IN II,0) TDIP ( R) VAPOR PRESS (in 11,0) (in 11,0) (il0URS) RATE OsT % /24 liR) 5-13-74 0110 55.71 1543.72 528.71 7.81 1.71 0 ---- 0210 55.60 1540.67 528.55 7.77 4.03 1 3.632 i 0310 55.49 1537.62 528.41 7.76 6.22 1 3.341 0410 55.41 1535.41 528.30 .74 8.22 - 1 3.101 0510 55.34 1534,50 528.21 7.71 10.22 1 3.084 0610 55.24 1530.70 528.10 7.70 12.31 1 3.278 0710 55.16 1528.50 528.01 7.66 14.23 1 2.9728 0810 55.06 1527.80 527.92 7.66 16.22 1 3.14824 0910 55.01 1524.40 527.82 7.64 17.93 1 2.6818 n Period of b Re-Pressurization and stabilization following isolation of leakage 5-13-74 1520 55.98 1551.21 528.49 7.77 0 1620 55.96 1550.65 528.19 7.71 0.20 1 .2247 1720 55.95 1550.37 528.11 7.71 0.54 1 .5308 1820 55.94 1550.10 528.04 7.70 0.57 1 .0347 1920 55.92 1549.49. 527.98 7.68 0.70 1 .1726 2020 55.91 1549.21 527.92 7.64 0.78 1 .06375 2120 55.87 1548.27 527.86 7.64 0.99 1 .3285 2220 55.87 1548.25 527.78 7.61 1.15 1 .2048 2320 55.84 1547.29 527.70 7.60 1.42 1 .4069
~
~
APPENDIX A (cont) TYPE A TEST DATA AND CALCUIATIONS CONTAINMENT CONTAINMENT REF - CONTAINMENT PRESS AVERAG- CONTAINMENT AVG OlAMBER DP TEST INTERVAL. CALCULATED LEAK DATE TDIE (PSIA) (IN 110) 2 TDiP R) VAPOR PRESS. (IN 112 0) (IN 110) 2 (1100RS) RATE (hT %/24 IIR) l 5-14 74 0020 55.82 1546.91 527.61 7.58 1.59 1 .2362 0120 55.82 1546.88 527.52 7.57 1.88 1 .4388 0220 55.80 1546.40 527.44 7.54 2.04 1 .2049 0320 55.78 1545.86 527.35 7.52 2.25 1 .2989 0420 55.78 1545.58 527.29 7.52 2.39 1 .21842 0520 55.77 1545.30 527.26 7.53 2.58 1 .3129 l ' 0620 55.74 1544.48 527.20 7.50 2.79 1 .2827 0720 55.71 1543.78 527.14 7.51 2.99 1 .3299 0820 55.72 1543.91 527.09 7.50 3.10 1 .1578 0920 55.70 1543.45 527.08 7.50 3.28 1 .2815 1020 55.71 1543.63 527.06 7.50 3.40 1 .1880 1120 55.70 1543.45 527.06 7.50 3.60 1 .3125 $$ 1220 55.71 1543.63 527.09 7.52 3.75 1 .2646 1320 55.71 1543.63 527.10 7.50 3.85 1 .1250 1420 55.70 1543.45 527.11 7.52 4.05 1 .3434 1520 55.70 1543.45 '527.12 7.52 4.15 1 .1559 1620 55.70 1543.45 527.13 7.54 4.25 1 . 34 34 1720 55.68 1542.76 527.13 7.53 4.49 1 .2813 1820 55.66 1542.47 527.12 7.54 4.59 1 .250c 1920 55.65 1542.19 527.09 7.53 4.72 1 .1887 2020 55.65 1542.05 527.07 7.52 4.89 1 .2509 2120 55.63 1541.50 527.05 7.52 4.98 1 .1415
.. , . . ~ r. _ .
o . .
- s. - .
APPENDIX A (cont) TYPE A TEST DATA AND CALCULATIONS
'~
I 1.0 ; ig
.to .
0.9 i !
, t- . -t
[ , i j. _. ! __i_ ____h_. ..! b-._. -{ - - j , j ^~' 0.8 t , [ i i _; j i .
. -[ .
_ . } ._. Q i i __
- - -- h i -
r- , . -- 0.7 ; ; ___ _.r.. j
--.1.
[
, '.[,
i j i
. i 1 . ; . ,
- j-
,]e , L_ i
-j . .._ . . _ _ _ . . . . . . . . .- . - -
- l- -
~-; ,
.-. 0.6 l l [ i
+
w .s .;
, i
~
' ~ ~ ' ~ ~ * '
...;_.l
- [. . . .- -4 . . &
0.5 , l l t I p *-
'~ lt i .
l t
}.
[' , 4i > I l . .! . ....} Average of six. -
?
! j !
l i j 24 Hr. Conparisob- = O*4
~
. _ .. . t . ._
i _} [ ' j- ' a j i - 0.25198 (1620-2120) {' ,
~
l t di .__ __' 4_ _ . . . - T' 7 Y\ 0.3 ' j. i l S: ' m i ' I
. $ li- ~ / M_ +
T k_ U .
.,D_ m ,' .
0.2 1 i i
- - [ -- - - , .. ..
_ g .. . _ . . ._. .., . i . g , 0.1
,g 8
7__.
!- . _j. _ . .
i
.- _ -yH,- -{--. .l i-
. - - - - - - ~
I t - i i t'~-,~ I
. "&._p . ; . _ _ . t C . . . , , . . . . . .
2120 1520 '17'20 1920 2120 2320 015t0 0320 0520 0720 0920 1120 1320 1520 1720 1920 5/13/74 5/14/74 DATE AND TIME OF DAY FIG. A-1. Point te point plot of hourly leak rate calculations
APPENDIX B TYPE A TEST VERIFICATION DATA AND CALCUIATIONS CONFAIMIENF CONFAIMHihT REF COVfADMENT PRESS AVERAGE CONTAINMENT AVG CilAMBER DP TEST INTERVAL CALCULATED LIAK DATE TI?!E (PSIA) (IN 110) 2 TDIP (OR) VAPOR PRESS.(IN 112 0) (IN 110) 3 (110URS) RATE (hT % /24 IIR) 5-14-74 2125 55.63 1541.50 527.05 7.52 4.98 0 - 2225 55.62 1541.23 527.02 7.51 5.36 1 .58003 2325 55.59 1540.36 526.98 7.48 5.58 1 .30197 5-15-74 0025 55.58 1540.12 526.95 7.46 5.90 1 .4709 0125 55.59 1540.40 526.91 7.46 6.24 1 .5340 0225 55.58 1540.12 526.87 7.46 6.51 1 .4244 0325 55.55 1539.29 526.83 7.45 6.85 1 .5184 0425 55.51 1538.18 526.79 7.45 7.10 1 .3934 0.4604 L Le - 0.4604 vt%/ day AVE of 7 Ib " o.2858 19 '- 0.h604 - 0.2858
- 0.1746 Iv - I 'y = 0.0774 i03
. . _ _ _ ..__-....___._.___m.__ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . - - - _ _ . _ _ -
. ~
-- , . ~ -
APPENDIX B (cont) TYPE A TEST VERIFICATION DAI"- AND CALCULATIONS
- 1. 0 . .
1 0.9 r f i l !
- - ~ ~ 4-0.8 ~
~
~..'{~. .
. -h 4 g 1
l j l g
~ - - ~ ' ~ - '~-
0.7' ~ - ~
, ! : , -I -
}
4
- . . . . . . . . <... .... . -+ - .-
{ . e
~ n
~-~ '
0.6 T ~- - ^ - ~ '~ " ~ ~
~ ~
N ;(. j l - - - ~ '- l '- f i
. .; . . . . i. . .
,i 0.5 - --
j g y yyj T- 7- f iT(i ?".ge;of s-n.i
~~~
g 0.4~ ~- i* 4 f 'tw _ f -
- ~ ~
A - r
^
u nupp A mS'
~ ~}
e f- i l 1 -l e l ! 1 0.3' '- .
.__ ..__ . . . _ _ j. .. J . t._ . ._ _l .. . . . .
"" i l 1 r 0.2 -
.l .
(._
,._. ..g .
=
I
' ~ ~- ~ ~"
0.1' ' ~ ~ I~
~ - ~
* ' 4
- i e : i
. 6 m A a a i a A A e A 2125 22'25 2525 00'25 01'25 02'25 0525 04'25 5/14/74 5/15/74 DATE AND TIME OF DAY FIG. B-1, Point to point plot of hourly leak rate calculations during controlled bleed test . .
( 1 1 a I
, . )
i l ! Appendix C i ; i ! TfPE B AND TYPE C TEST DATA AND RESULTS . ( I 1 i Valve or Test 3~ Technical Specificatior Measured Leak Rate (SCFF) Penetration. Volume (ft Leakage Limit As Found
- As Left
] '^ 2.26 17.2 SCFH e 41 psig 0.047 0.047 !{ X-100A X-100B 2.31 17.2 SCFH 0 41 psig 0.048 0.048 1 1 X-100C 1.92 17.2 SCFH e 41 psig 0.16 0.16 q i X-100D 2.05 17.2 SCFH 8 41 psig 0.043 0.043 X-101B 1.93 17.2 SCFH @ 41 psig 0.080 0.080 ! ! X-101D 1.97 17.2 SCFH 0 41 psig 0.00 0.00 X-103 2.05 17.2 SCFH 9 41 psig 0.00 0.00 k X-104A 1.94 17.2 SCFH e 41 psig 0.081 0.081 i X-104B 2.06 17.2 SCFH 8 41 psig- 0.0256 0.0256 X-104C 1.93 17.2 SCFH 0 41 psig 0.00 0.00 X-104D 2.05 17.2 SCFH e 41 psig 0.00 0.00 X-105A 1.92 17;2 SCFH e 41 psig 0.32 0.32 j X-105C 2.05 17.2 SCFH 0 41 psig 0.00 0.00 , j X-105D 1.93 17.2 SCFH 8 41 psig 0.00 0.00' 4 j A0 2541A 6 .044 17.2 SCFH 9 41 psig 5.80 5.80 A0 2541B A0 2561A 5 .044 17.2 SCFH 9 41 psig 1.79 1.79 ; AD 2561B i N Control i Sfstem 0.25 17.2 SCFH 9 41 psig 15.03 1.97
- Sample
- Valves (Note 1)
CV 3267 CV 3268 G 1.15 17.2 SCFH 8 41 psig 0.141 0.141 CV 3269 . t< j ., 50 2373 6 0.973 17.2 SCFH @ 41 psig 487.4 1.53
- 50 2374 4
i
!' !A0 2-80A 40.74 11.5 SCFH 0 25 psig 73.4' 3.35-1 A0 2-86A 40.74 11.5 SCFH e 25 psig 4.75 Combined Leakage !
- (i 1
.A0 2-80B 40.74 11.5 SCFH e 25 psig 1.01 1.01
- s- i j 'A0 2-86B 40.74- 11.5 SCFH 8 25 psig 3.52 3.52 A0 2-80C 40.74 11.5 SCFH 8 25 psig 0.00 0.00 A0 2-86C 40.74 11.5 SCFH 8 25 psig 3.88 3.88 i
i
--'--e-m'- -
y.ww=* p g w - ene r es e+g---e
- 4 APPENDIX C (cont)
Valve or Test , Technical SpecificatiorMeasured Leak Rate (SCFHL Fenetration Volume (ft' Leakage Limit i As Found
- As Left A0 2-80D 40.74 11.5 SCFH 0 25 psig 4.62 4.62
, A0 2-86D 40.74 11.5 SCFH 0 25 psig 5.08 5.08 l l A0 2379 6 ! 1 DhV 8-2 11.8 17.2 SCFH @ 41 psig 3.23 0.19 1 2 06 11.8 17.2 SCFH @ 41 psig 5.06 4.76 7 A0 2377 A0 2378 6 210 17.2 SCFH @ 41 psig 4.62 2.03 A0,23S1 A0 2386 A0 2287 6 3.7 17.2 SCFH @ 41 psig 0.56 0.56 , CY 2385 j A0 2896 l A0 2383 6 3.7 17.2 SCFH @ 41 psig 3.32 3.32 CV 2384 10.4 17.2 SCFH @ 41 psig 0.31 0.31 5 HFC1-9 6.7 17.2 SCFH @ 41 psig 65.6 0.00 - HPC1 - 14 0.05 17.2 SCFH @ 41 psig 0.00 0.00 ! RCIC - 9 1.1 17.2 SCFH 0 41 psig 12.57 9.88 RCIC - 16 0.06 17.2 SCFH 0 41 psig 5.71 5.71 hy 06 2.53 17.2 SCFH 9 41 psig 0.48 0.48 FD 2075 6 i FD 2076 1.46 17.2 SCFH @ 41 psig 0.39 0.39 l 4 XP - 6 0.14 17.2 SCFH 8 41 psig 2.08 0.00 1.7 17.2 SCFH @ 41 psig 0.13 0.13 2 FW 94-1 19 17.2 SCFH @ 41 psig 1.38 1.38 l FW 94-2 19 17.2 SCFH 0 41 psig 6.28 6.28 FW 97-1 6.9 17.2 SCFH 0 41 psig 0.56 0.56 FW 97-2 6.9 17.2 SCFH @ 41 psig 929 0.00 ; A0 10-46A 44 17.2 SCFH 8 41 psig 27.7 3.21 A0 10-46B 43 17.2 SCFH @ 41 psig 1.95 1.95 50 2014 81 17.2 SCFH e 41 psig 2.04 2.04 50 2015 77 17.2 SCFH e 41 psig 3.92 3.92 l
. .~ APPDiDIX C (cont)
Valve or Test Technical Specificatior hieasured Leak RatI(SCF10 ' Penetration Volume (ft ) Leakage Limit As Found
- As Left
.2 6 5.9 17.2 SCFH 9 41 psig 0.41 0.41 13.7 17.2 SCFH 0 41 psig 0.07 0.07 fDD 3 U 1.23 17.2 SCFH @ 41 psig 0.00 0.00 fD22 10 2029 20.8 17.2 SCFH @ 41 psig 0.34 0.34 10 2030 83.7 17.2 SCFH 0 41 psig 10.2 10.2 50 1753 8.3 17.2 SCFH e 41 psig 0.02 0.02 ..
FD 1754 7.13 17.2 SCFH 0 41 psig 1.96 1.96 A0 14-13A 2.5 17.2 SCFH e 41 psig 331 15.82 A0 14-13B 1.7 17.2 SCFH @ 41 psig 396 2.62 CRD-31 1.2 17.2 SCFH 9 41 psig 4.7 4.7 Airlock 380 Ensure sealing 910 psig 0.00 0.00 AirJock. Electrical .042 17.2 SCFH 9 41 psig 0.09 0.09 Penetration Torus Manway Note 2 Note 3 0.00 0.07 Norhteast Note 4 Torus Manway Note 2 Note 3 0.00 0.07 Southwest Note 4 Drywell Note 2 Note 3 0.00 0.00 , Head U a way Note 2 Note 3' O.52 0.52 f RD 10.3 Note 2 Note 3 0. 0') 37 Drywell r3 Equipment Note 2 Note 3 0.82 1.51 Hatch Note 4 Seismic {! Pertraint Note 2 Note 3 0.18 0.18
- s. Port A Seismic
{ iPertraint Note 2 Note 3 0.00 0.00 i Port B l
. . . APPENDIX C (cont)
\'alve or Test Technical Specification Measured Leak Rate (SCFH Penetration l Volume3 (ft ) Leakage Limit .
l As Found
- I As Left.
Seismic Restraint Note 2 Note 3 0.00 0.00 Port C
, Seismic ;
i Restraint Note 2 : Note 3 2.66 2.66 Port D ! Seismic ! Restraint Note 2 Note 3 0.02 0.02 Fort E Seismic ; Restraint Note 2 Note 3 0.02 j 0.02 Port F , I Seismic j Restraint jNote2 Note 3 0.02 0.02 Port G i i Seismic Restraint l Note 2 Note.3 1.67 1,67 Port H Note 2 oard 17.2 SCFH @ 41 psig 0.03 0.03-Ob oard !Ntc2 .17.2 SCFH 0 41 psig 0.00 0.00 Note 2 17.2 SCFH 9 41 psig 1.13 1.13 n ard Note 2 17.2 SCFH 0 41 psig 0.00 0.00 t ard . Note 2 17.2 SCFH @ 41 psig 0.00 0.00 n ard-Note 2 17.2 SCFH 0 41 psig 0.00 0.00 ard r X-7D L. Inboard Note 2 17.2 SCFH 9 41 psig 0.87 0.87 A ' !- 0b card te 2 17.2 SCFH 0 41 psig 0.22 0.22 Note 2 17.2 SCFH @ 41 psig 0.12 0.12 n ard t ard Note 2 17.2 SCFH @ 41 psig 0.03 0.03
- X-9A Inboard Note 2 17.2 SCFH @ 41 psig 0.00 0.00 i
(
APPENDIX C (cont) , l Valve or Test Technical Specification 4easured leak Rate (SCFH) , Penetratiot Volume Leakage Limit As Found* As Left Note 2 17.2 SCFH 9 41 psig 0.00 0.00 Outboard Note 2 17.2 SCFH 8 41 psig 0.00 0.00
. ,g .
N te 2 17.2 SCFH 9 41 psig 1.28 1.28 Ifu ard , Note 2 17.2 SCFH @ 41 psig 0.00 0.00 bboard Note 2 17.2 SCFM @ 41 psig 0.03 0.03 u card Note 2 17.2 SCFH 0 41 psig 0.00 f 0.00 kbard , i Note 2 17.2 SCFH 9 41 psig 0.07 0.07 l utboard X-12 Note 2 17.2 SCFH 8 41 psig 0.56 0.56 i
. inboard X-l' Note 2 17.2 SCFH 0 41 psig 0.32 0.32 j
. outboard l X-13A Note 2 17.2 SCFH 8 41 psig 0.48 0.48
! inboard Note 2 17.2 SCFH 0 41 psig 0.00 ; 0.00 utb ard ,
l
;{;@rd l Note 2 17.2 SCFH @ 41 psig 0.00 0.00 X-13B . Note 2 17.2 SCFH @ 41 psig- 0.17 -
0.17 outboard
- X-14 Note 2 17.2 SCFH @ 41 psig 0.01 0.01
.: Inboard X-14 17.2 SCFH e 41 psig 0.01 0.01 outboard l Note 2 X-16A Note 2 17.2 SCFH 0 41 psig 0.57 0.57
. inboard X-16A Note 2 17.2 SCFH 9 41 psig 0.13 0.13 outboard X-16B Note 4 17.2 SCFH 0 41 psig 1.17 $.17 fi L
inboard Note 2 17.2 SCFH 0 41 psig 0.56' O.56
. ard Note 2 0.05 0.05 f[ard 17.2 SCFH e 41 psig
- s. -
4 APPDiDIX C (cont) IValve or Test'(ft3 {' ' Technical Specificatio41easured Leakage Rate (SC FIO Penetration Volume Leakage Limit As Found* As Left
.X-17 Note 2 Note 3 0.04 0.04 outboard NOTES: 1. The following valves were tested as. a group by pressurizing a comon drain line manifold CV 3305 6 CV 3306 CV 3307 6 CV 3308 CV 3309 6 CV 3310 CV 3311 6 CV 3312
~
CV 3313 6 CV 3314
- 2. The volumes of the toroidal spaces in the double-gasketed seals are uncertain due to' the presence of flexible rubber, and in any case are quite small. For all seals except the drywell head, the volume of the test rig was used as the test volume. For the drywell head,
, twice the volume of the test rig was used as the test volume. The expansion bellows penetration similarly have a small volume and the volume of the test rig was used as the test volume.
- 3. The Technical Specification for double-gasketed seals is that the total leakage not exceed 34.4 scfh/hr 0 41 psig. No specification is given for an individual double-gasketed seal.
- 4. The "as left" leak rate for these penetrations was the leak rate measured imediately prior to the integrated leakage rate test. All Type B penetrations opened for the outage were retested when closed.
- Refueling outage valve leakage problems and corrective measures are summarized in Mr. L.O. Mayer's letter to Mr. J.F.0' Leary dated May 20,1974.
u o
?'
B _m________________________._____- _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _. . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
O 2 t ( l APPENDIX D Containment Volume Data and Calculations ' Date Time Flovmeter Reading Containment Pressure Containment Avg Containment Avg Calculated ft3 psia Temperature R Vapor Pms psia Volume ft3 t 5/12/74 1330 121704 18 56 528.45 0.284 - 1430 121777 22.76 529.C2 0.288 26 0753 1530 121842 27.21 529.10 0.290 218881 1630 121924 31 36 529 20 0.291 296023 1730 122988 36.57 529 38 o.291 183776 , 1830 122059 40.18 529 51 530.06 0.291 0.291 294949 252314 f 1930 122129 44 38 2030 122205 48.78 530.41 0.291 260778 2130 122266 53.OB 530.27 0.29o 211355 Aversge of e1 6ht 247353 ft3 l I
- - -}}