ML20041D145
| ML20041D145 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 02/18/1982 |
| From: | Stolz J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Florida Power Corp, City of Alachua, FL, City of Bushnell, FL, City of Gainesville, FL, City of Kissimmee, FL, City of Leesburg, FL, City of New Smyrna Beach, FL, Utilities Commission, City of New Smyrna Beach, FL, City of Ocala, FL, City of Orlando, FL, Orlando Utilities Commission, Sebring Utilities Commission, Seminole Electric Cooperative, City of Tallahassee, FL |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20041D146 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC 47093, TAC 47463, DPR-72-A-052 NUDOCS 8203040357 | |
| Download: ML20041D145 (9) | |
Text
'
e"%
s
/p o
UNITED STATES 8"
',h NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j
WASHINGTON,0. C. 20565 j;
/
FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION CITY OF ALACHUA CITY OF BUSHNELL CITY OF GAINESVILLE CITY OF KISSIMMEE CITY OF LEESBURG CITY OF NEW SMYRNA BEACH AND UTILITIES COMMISSION, CITY OF NEW SMYRNA BEACH CITY OF OCALA ORLANDO UTILITIES COMMISSION AND CITY OF ORLANDO SEBRING UTILITIES COMMISSION SEMIN0LE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.
CITY OF TALLAHASSEE DOCKET N0. 50-302 CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No.52 License No. DPR-72 1.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:
A.
The applications for amendment by Florida Power Corporation, et al (the licensees) dated October 8,1981, and December ll,1981, comply with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B.
The facility will operate in conformity with the applications, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C.
There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; D.
The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and l
E.
The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of i
the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.
l l
8203040357 820218 PDR ADOCK 05000302 p
, 2.
Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Facility Operating License No. DPR-72 is hereby amended to read as follows:
(2) Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendices A and B, as revised through Amendment No. 52, are hereby incorporated in the license. Florida Power Corporation shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.
3.
This license amendment is effective as of the date of its
' issuance.
(*
R THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
~ ' 0 $$AD(. -
Johh F. Stolz, Chief OppatingReactorsBra)nch#4
-D1 vision of Licensing
Attachment:
Changes to the Technical Specifications i
i Date of Issuance: February 18, 1982
_~
ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO.52 i
FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE N0. DPR-72 DOCKET NO. 50-302 Replace the following pages of the Appendix "A" Technical Specifications with the enclosed pages. The revised pages are identified by Amendment number and contain vertical lines indicating the area of change. The i
corresponding overleaf pages are also provided to maintain document completeness.
3/4 6-23 3/4 6-24 3/4 7-23 3/4 7-24 83/4 7-5
\\
i
.~
~
CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS HYDROGEN PURGE SYSTEM LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.6.4.2 A containment hydrogen purge system shall be OPERABLE.
APPLICABILITY: MODES I and 2.
ACTION:
With the containment hydrogen purge system inoperable, restore the hydrogen purge system to OPERABLE status within 30 days or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.6.4.2 The hydrogen purge system shall be demonstrated OPERABLE:
At least once per 31 days by initiating, from the control room, flow through a.
the HEPA filters and charcoal adsorbers and verifying that the system operates for at least 15 minutes.
b.
At least once per 18 months or (1) after any structural maintenance on the HEPA filter or charcoal adsorber housings, or (2) following painting, fire or chemical release in any ventilation zone communicating with the system by:
1.
Verifying that the purge system satisfies the in-place testing acceptance criteria and uses the test procedures of Regulatory Positions C.5.a, C.S.c*, and C.5.d* of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 1, July 1976, and the system flow rate is ; 1500 SCFM.
2.
Verifying within 31 days after removal that a laboratory analysis of a representative carbon sample obtained in accordance with Regulatory Position C.6.b of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 1 July 1976, meets the laboratory testing criteria of Regulatory Position C.6.a of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 1, July 1976.
The air flow distribution test of Section 8 of ANSI N510-1975 may be performed downstream of the MEPA filters, j
CRYSTAL P.IVER - UNIT 3 3/A 6-23 Amendmett No. 52 l
CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS SURVEILLANCE RdQUIREMENTS (continued) 3.
Verifying the system flow rate is ; 1500 SCFM when tested in accordance with ANSI N510-1975.
c.
After every 720 hours0.00833 days <br />0.2 hours <br />0.00119 weeks <br />2.7396e-4 months <br /> of charcoai adsorber operation by verifying within 31 days after removal that a laboratory analysis of a representative carbon sample obtained in accordance with Regulatory Position C.6.b of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 1, July 1976, meets the laboratory testing criteria of Regulatory Position C.6.a of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 1, July 1976.
d.
At least once per 18 months by verifying that the pressure drop across the combined HEPA filters and charcoal ao'sorber banks is <6 inches Water Gauge while operating at a flow rate ; 1500 SCFM.
l After each complete or partial replacement of a HEPA filter bank by verifying e.
that the HEPA filter banks remove :ar 99% of the DOP when they are tested in-place in accordance with ANSI N510-1975* while operating the system at a flow rate ; 1500 SCFM.
f.
After each complete or partial replacement of a charcoal adsorber bank by verifying that the charcoal adsorbers remove a: 99 % of a halogenated hyorocarbon refrigerant test gas when they are tested in-place in accordance with ANSI N510-1975* while operating the system at a flow rate ; 1500 SCFM.
l CRYSTAL RIVER - UNIT 3 W4 6-24 Amendment No. 52 e
PLANT SYSTD45 3/4.7.8 AUXILIARY BUILDING VENTILATION EXHAUST SYSTD4 LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3 7.8.1 The Auxiliary Building ventilation exhaust systaa shall be OPERABLE and shall consist of a minigian of two independent pairs of exhaust fans and four filter systens I
APPLICABILITY:
MODES 1, 2, 3 and u.
ACTION:
With one pair of exhaust fans or one filter systen inoperable, restore the inoperable pair of fans or systen to OPERABLE status within 7 days or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHU1DOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
SURVEILLANCE REOUIREMENTS 4.7.8.1.
Each Auxiliary Building ventilation exhaust systen shall be demonstrated OPERABLE:
a.
At least once per 31 days on a STAGGERED TEST BASIS by initiating, from the control rocrn, flow through the HEPA filters and charcoal adsorbers and verifying that the systen operates for at icast 15 minutes.
b.
At least once per 18 months or (1) after any structural maintenance on the HEPA filters or charcoal adsorber housings; or (2) following painting, fire or chenical release in any ventilation zone cormnuni-cating with the systen by:
1.
Verifying that with the system operating at a flow rate of 156.680 cfin + 10% and exhausting through the HEPA filters and charcoal adsorcers, the total bypass flow of the systen to the facility vent, incitsiing leakage through the systen diverting valves, is i 1% when the syster is tested by admitting cold DOP at the systen intage.
l l
I More than one filter system and more than one pair of exhaust fans may be inoperable for up to 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> for surveillance testing per Specification 4.7. 8.1.b, e, or f.
t I
CRYSTAL RIVER - UNIT 3 3/4 7-23 Amendment No. 24, 52
PLANT SYSTEMS
_SURVEII. LANCE RECUIRDers (Continued) 2.
Verifying that the ventilation systen satisfies the in-place testing acceptance criteria and ps C.S.d} procedures the tes of Regulatory Positions C.S.a, C.5.c, and of Regulatory l
Guide 1.52, Revision 1, July 1976, and the systen now rate is 156,680 con + 10%.
3 Verifying within 31 days after removal that a laboratory ar:alysis of a representative carbon sanple obtained in accordance with Regulatory Position C.6.b of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 1, July 1976, meets the laboratory testing criteria of Regulatory Position C.6.a of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 1,
July 1976.3 l
4.
Verifying a systen flow rate of 156,680 can + 10% during systen operation when tested in accordance with ANSI N310-1975.
c.
After every 720 hours0.00833 days <br />0.2 hours <br />0.00119 weeks <br />2.7396e-4 months <br /> of charcoal adsorber operation by verifying within 31-days after renoval that a laboratory analy is of a representative carbon sanple obtained in accordance with Regulatory Position C.6.b. of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 1, July 1976, meets the laboratory testing criteria of Regulatory Position C.6.a of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 1, July 1976.J l
d.
At least once per 18 months by verifying that the pressure drop across the combined HEPA filters and charcoal adsorber banks is <6 inches Water Gauge wnile operating the system at a Cow rate of 156,680 can 101.
+
After each complete or partial replacanent of a HEPA filter bank by e.
verifying that the HEPA filter banks renove ~ 99% of the CCP when they are tested in-place in accordance with ANSI N510-1975' while l
operating the systan at a Cow rate of 39,170 can 10%.
f.
After each complete or partial replacesent of a charcoal adsorber bank by verifying that the charcoal adsorbers renove > 99% of a halo-genated hydrocarbon refrigerant tes gas when they are tested in-place in accordance with ANSI N510-1975 while operating the system at a j
flow rate of 39,170 con : 10%.
2 The air flow distribution test, Secticn 3 cf ANSI N510-1975, may be perfomed dow1strean of the HEPA filters.
3 W.e-labcratory test of Table 3 for a representative sample of used I
activsted caroon shall be per Test 5b in Table 2 at a relative hunidity of 70% for a methyl iodide removal efficiency of > 951.
CRYSTAL RIVER - lJNI' 3 3/u 7-2u Amendrent no. 4, 52
PLANT SYSTEMS BASES 3/4.7.8 AUXILIARY BUILDING VENTILATION EXHAUST SYSTEM
]
The OPERABILITY of the Auxiliary Building ventilation exhaust system ensures that suitable ambient conditions for personnel and equipment are maintained for all cperating periods and that the effects of post accident contitions in the Auxiliary Building are mitigated.
Supply and exhaust duct systems are arranged to direct air from areas of low to higher activity eventually directing it to the main exhaust filter system and from there through the fans to the exhaust vent.
The.nain exhaust filters include roughing, HEPA, and charcoal cells.
3/4.7.9 HYDRAULIC SNUBBERS The hydraulic snubbers are required OPERABLE to ensure that the struc-'
tural integrity of the reactor coolant system and all other safety-related syriems is maintained during and following a seismic or other event initiating dynamic loads. The only snubbers excluded from this inspection program are those installed on nonsafety-related systems, and then only if their failure or failure of the system on which they are installed would have no adverse effect on any safety-related system.
The inspection frequency applicable to snubbers containing seals fabricated f rom materials which have been demonstrated compatible with their operating envir-onment is based upon maintaining a constant level of snubber protection. There-fore, the required inspection interval varies ir.versely with the observed snubber failures.. The number of inoperable snubbers found during an inspection of these snubbers determines the time interval for the next required inspection of these snubbers. Inspections performed before that interval has elapsed may be used as a new reference point to determine the next inspection. However, the results of such early inspections performed before the original required time interval has elapsed (nominal time less than 25%) may not be used to lengthen the required I
inspection interval. Any inspection whose results require a shorter inspection interval will override the previous schedule.
To provide further assurance of snubber reliability,. a representative sample of the installed snubbers will be functionally tested during plant shutdowns at 18 month intervals. These tests will include stroking of the snubbers to verify proper piston movement, lock-up and bleed. Observed failures of these sample snubbers will require functional testing of additional units.
To minimize personnel exposures, snubbers installed in hi;h radiation :enes or in especially difficult to remove locations may be exemptec from these functional testing requirements provided the OPERA 3ILITY of these snubbers was demonstrated during functional testing at either the ecmpletien cf their fabrication or at a subsequent date.
1 CRYSTAL RI'.*ER - UNIT 3 3 3/4 7-5 Amendment No. 52 i
i
PLANT SYSTEMS BASES 3/4.7.10 SEALED SOURCE CONTAMINATION The limitations on removable contamination for sources requirin leak testing, including alpha emitters, is based on 10 CFR 70.39(c) g limits for plutonium. This limitation will ensure that leakage from byproduct, source, and special nuclear material sources will not exceed allowable intake values.
3.4.7.11 FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS The OPERABILITY of the fire suppression systems ensures that ade-quate fire suppression capability is available to confine and extinguish fires occurring in any portion of the facility where safety related equipment is located. The fire suppression system consists of the water system, deluge and sprinklers, hose stations and Halon. The collective capability of the fire suppression systems is adequate to minimize potential damage to safety related equipment and is a major element in the facility fire protection program.
In the event that portions of the fire suppression systems are inoperable, alternate backup fire fighting equipment is required to be made available in the affected areas until the affected equipment can be restored to service.
In the event that the fire suppression water system becomes in-operable, immediate corrective measures must be taken since this system provides the major fire suppression capability of the plant. The require-ment for a twenty-four hour report to the Commission provides for prompt evaluation of the acceptability of the corrective measures to provide adequate fire suppression capability for the continued protection of the nuclear plant.
3/4.7.12 PENETRATION FIRE BARRIERS The functional integrity of the penetration fire barriers ensures that fires will be confined or adequately retarded from spreading to adjacent portions of the facility. This design feature minimizes the possibility of a single fire rapidly involving several areas of the facility prior to detection and extinguishment. The penetration fire barriers are a passive element in the facility fire protection program and are subject to periodic inspection.
During periods of time when the barriers are not functional, a continuous fire watch is required to be maintained in the vicinity of the affected barrier until the barrier is restored to functional status.
I CRYSTAL RIVER - UNIT,3 83/47-6 Amendment No.
-