Letter Sequence Other |
|---|
|
Results
Other: 05000266/LER-1979-010-01, /01T-0 on 790620:plant Safeguards Actuation Circuitry Review Indicated Need for Circuitry Changes.Caused by Changes in IEEE Std Since Plant Design.Mods to Four Applicable Safeguard Circuits Will Be Performed, ML19210C482, ML19242D259, ML19253A712, ML19253B006, ML19257A367, ML19257B511, ML19289C679, ML19310A971, ML19323H481, ML19345H544, ML20010E141, ML20027A527, ML20038C635, ML20039A258, ML20040F029, ML20065R665
|
MONTHYEARML20027A5271978-11-28028 November 1978
Discusses Possible Dangers of LOCA in Containment Purging During Normal Plant Oper.Requests Either Commitment to Limit Purging or Justification for Continuing.W/Encl ANO 7812080207
Project stage: Other
ML19289C6791979-01-16016 January 1979
Responds to Re Purging During Normal Operation. Need for Purging Has Been Limited,But It Is Essential That Capability of in-containment Activities at Power Be Maintained
Project stage: Other
05000266/LER-1979-010-01, /01T-0 on 790620:plant Safeguards Actuation Circuitry Review Indicated Need for Circuitry Changes.Caused by Changes in IEEE Std Since Plant Design.Mods to Four Applicable Safeguard Circuits Will Be Performed1979-07-0303 July 1979
/01T-0 on 790620:plant Safeguards Actuation Circuitry Review Indicated Need for Circuitry Changes.Caused by Changes in IEEE Std Since Plant Design.Mods to Four Applicable Safeguard Circuits Will Be Performed
Project stage: Other
ML19253A7121979-08-0808 August 1979
Confirms Action Taken as Result of 790803 Telcon Re Util Request to Leave Containment Purge Values Closed Above Cold Shutdown Condition.Proposal Acceptable on one-time Basis
Project stage: Other
ML19242D2591979-08-10010 August 1979
Appreciates Prompt Approval of Request to Purge Containment. Approval Reduced Personnel Inconvenience & man-rem Exposure. Will Pursue Review of Containment Purge Sys
Project stage: Other
ML19253B0061979-09-0606 September 1979
Discusses Containment Purge Valve Operations.Notifies of Potential Mods to Ensure That Valves Will Close Against Containment Pressure Transients.Consultants Will Conduct Studies & Analyses of Potential Mods
Project stage: Other
ML19323H4811979-09-30030 September 1979
Technical Evaluation of Electrical Instrumentation & Control Design Aspects of Override Containment Purge Valve Isolation & Other Engineered Safety Feature Signals for Point Beach Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2
Project stage: Other
ML19210C4821979-11-0101 November 1979
Responds to Re Guidelines for Operability of Containment Purging & Venting Valves During Normal Operations.Evaluation Will Consider Consultant Studies of Potential Mods to Valves
Project stage: Other
ML19257A3671979-11-19019 November 1979
Forwards Interim Position on Containment Purging & Venting During Normal Operation Pending Resolution of Isolation Valve Operability.Commitment to Comply W/Encl Position Should Be Submitted within 45 Days
Project stage: Other
ML19310A9711979-12-27027 December 1979
Requests Preliminary Evaluation of Licensee Response to NRC 791023 Interim Position for Containment Purge & Vent Valve Operation Pending Resolution of Isolation Valve Operability, Generic Item B-24.Evaluation Form Encl
Project stage: Other
ML19257B5111980-01-0909 January 1980
Provides Commitments Sought in NRC .Forwards to Bechtel Re Purge Valve Capability Verification.Nrc Guidelines Will Be Considered During Evaluation of Mods for Improved Purge Valve Reliability
Project stage: Other
ML19257C8081980-01-11011 January 1980
Forwards Safety Evaluation to Be Substituted for Encl in Ltr Per Agreement Reached at 791213 Meeting Re Containment Purge
Project stage: Approval
ML19257C8101980-01-11011 January 1980
Safety Evaluation Approving Electrical,Instrumentation & Control Design Aspects of Override of Containment Purge Valve Isolation,Except Radiation Monitors Used to Initiate Containment Purge Isolation
Project stage: Approval
ML19323H4781980-05-22022 May 1980
Forwards Safety Evaluation Supporting Design Aspects of Containment Purge Valve Isolation Override & Other Engineered Safety Feature Actuation Signals Except Radiation Monitors Which Initiate Containment Purge Isolation
Project stage: Approval
ML19345H5441981-05-0707 May 1981
Documents Basis for Containment Isolation Pressure Setpoint Reported in Item II.E.4.2 of NUREG-0737 Response Per NRC 810414 Telcon.Present 5 Psig Setpoint Considered Realistic & Appropriate
Project stage: Other
ML20008F4471981-07-21021 July 1981
IE Info Notice 81-21, Potential Loss of Direct Access to Ultimate Heat Sink. Provides Addl Info to IE Bulletin 81-03
Project stage: Request
ML20038C6351981-07-31031 July 1981
Srp,Revision 2 to Section 6.2.4, Containment Isolation Sys
Project stage: Other
ML20010E1411981-08-28028 August 1981
Proposed Tech Spec Revision Pages 15.3.6-2,15.3.6-3, 15.4.4-12,15.4.4-15 & 15.4.4-15a Re Testing of Containment Purge Supply & Exhaust Sys Isolation Valves
Project stage: Other
ML20010E1361981-08-28028 August 1981
Application for Amend to Licenses DPR-24 & DPR-27 Submitted as Tech Spec Change Request 68 to Incorporate Addl Restrictions Re Use & Testing of Containment Purge Supply & Exhaust Sys Isolation Valves,Per NRC Request
Project stage: Request
ML20033C0321981-11-23023 November 1981
Second Discovery Progress Rept for Period Ending 811122,per ASLB 811113 Memorandum Order.Licensee 811027 Responses to Wi Environ Decade 811023 Interrogatories Are Not Fully Responsive.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence
Project stage: Request
ML20039B0181981-11-24024 November 1981
Requests That Util Remit Class III Fee for Unit 1 & Class I Fee for Unit 2 to Cover Review of 810828 Application for Tech Spec Changes Re Containment Purge Valve Operability
Project stage: Approval
ML20033A9071981-11-24024 November 1981
Advises of Significant Error in 811117 Telcon Transcript
Project stage: Request
ML20039A2581981-12-0707 December 1981
Requests That NRC Reconsider Requirement of Class III Approval Fee During Final Review Re Tech Spec Change Request 68.Changes to Tech Specs Result of NRC Request.No Approval Fee for Amend Review Necessary
Project stage: Other
ML20040F0291982-01-28028 January 1982
Proposed Tech Spec 15.3.6 Re Containment Purge Supply & Exhaust Valves
Project stage: Other
ML20040F0221982-01-28028 January 1982
Application for Amend to Licenses DPR-24 & DPR-27,consisting of Tech Spec Change Request 68 Re Containment Purge Valve Operability
Project stage: Request
ML20065R6651982-10-22022 October 1982
Provides Results of Confirmatory Analysis Demonstrating That Unacceptable Radioactive Release from Containment Would Not Take Place as Result of Small Break LOCA in Which Operator Action Required.Radioactive Release Negligible
Project stage: Other
1980-01-11
[Table View] |
Text
.
Wisconsin Electnc eom come 231 W. MICHIGAN, P.0, BOX 2046, MILWAUKEE, WI 53201 December 7, 198 4
6 CERTIFIED MAIL Mr. Willian O. Miller, Chief g-k, 6'%'
}
License Fee Management Branch
~
Office of Administration U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
~^
Washington, D. C.
20555
- p a
Dear Mr. Miller:
DOCKET NOS. 50-266 AND 50-301 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST NO. 68 POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 On August 28, 1981, we submitted, in accordance with the written request of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, a
license amendment application for the Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, to incorporate changes in the plant Technical Specifications to maintain containment purge supply and exhaust valves shut in other than the cold shut-down operation conditions.
We projected that on the basis that these changes were in response to the NRC request and for the convenience of the Commission no approval fee for the amendment review was necessary.
Your letter dated November 24, 1981 stated that this license amendment application requires a Class III fee of $4,000 for Unit 1 pursuant to 10 CFR 170.22.
The Unit 2 approval requires a Class I approval fee of $400.
Accordingly, we are submitting herewith a check in the amount of $4,400.
Although payment of this fee is required under the NRC Staff's interpretation of the 10 CFR 170 regulation, we would urge that in the Staff's final review of this application you reconsider our previous arguments.
If in this final review the need for an amendment fee is confirmed, we believe the Class II fee category for changes which are administrative in nature is more appropriate to this application.
Very truly yours,
~m m
\\
y(&C Exe tive Vice President Sol Burstein
&J l 216 0 ($
g[#
Enclosure (Check No. 649311)
I Copy to NRC Resident Inspector f
d i
