ML20033F448

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Meeting Scheduled on 880915 W/Doe Investigation Team on Waste Encapsulation & Storage Facility Capsule Incident.Meeting Requested by R Hultgren,Doe.Related Info, Including Item for EDO Staff Meeting & Viewgraphs Encl
ML20033F448
Person / Time
Issue date: 08/31/1988
From: Jim Hickey
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To: Joseph Austin, Cunningham R, Sjoblom G
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
Shared Package
ML20033D963 List:
References
FOIA-90-29 NUDOCS 9003210084
Download: ML20033F448 (20)


Text

.<,c...,

n:. a.=::w:+;a:w; a::1.~.:v::q p.=,. _,

- ~.nu.:..w,,. n. w w : m.w. ~.,,....

d:

g" 1.i i

h 54 AUG s 1 1988 c.;

I c1 W

hI NOTE T0:

Richard E. Cunningham, IMNS l

")

f

- Glen L. Sjoblom, IMNS th d

Joh! R. Auttin, IMA8 Maio.al A. Lamastra, IMAB t

Steven L. Baggett, Db ll 3.y Patricia C. Vacca. IMAB

,yj FRON:

John L'. N. Hickey, IMNS W

L.,

SUBJECT:

SEPTEMBER 15 MEETING WITH DOE INVESTIGATION TEAM ON y;

WESF CAPSULE INCIDENT m4b On August 30, 1988, Ron Hultgren called and requested a meeting with NRC 2

Headquarters staff regarding WESF Capsules. He is the Chairman of an 4

independent DOE group investigating the Georgia incident. The group has

A.

already talked to Region II, Region III, and the State of Georgia. Their Pt primary concern with NRC Headquarters is infornation on the process by which

(

we approved use of WESF Capsules in licensed irradiators.

M di I confirmed the meeting for RW5ry__ M r-t White y

Flint. Prior to the meeting I will work wiW feve Bagget an ja

1 Vacca to organize the relevant files.

n=

E John W. N. Hickey, IMNS wi cc:

H. Thompson 1

R. Bernero 3

J. Lubenau

?

A

'li e(

'a

T*'it

,m 9003210084 900312 PDR>-FOIA 4-01LBERT90-29

PDR, S r.

c zw a

ww a:-u...www.

.- m....

,.1,

..a.n. :.. w..

w. :.w. n....

x.

._ w :. w.

.s L&';

R, l

W g.

e pg d

F ITEM FOR THE E00 STAFF MEETING i

p-tJ; sr.

Medical, Academic, and Consnercial Use Safety Branch n}

d August 25, 1988 1:'T b

4 Meetina with Department of Eneray (DOE) Recarding Return of Cesium-137 d

Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility (WESF) Sources to DOE f

w l

On August 24, 1988 NMSS/IMNS staff met with representatives of DOE and its ISL 8..., -

contractors to discuss DOE's plans and schedule for accepting returned Cs-137 WESF sources from commercial users in the United States.

A d

DOE indicated that its _WESF facility at Hanford is the best place for it ay-to receive and store returned Cs-137 sources. However, this facility has j~

been in a " stand by condition" since January 1986.

In order to reactivate y

the WESF facility, DOE /Hanford will need to staff and train operators.

[

reinstall and test equipment, develop procedures approved by other DOE

$j components and perform other safety reviews before sources can be acceptea for long-term storage. With certain assumptions and planning for the 3

return of Cs ~137 sources from Radiation Sterilizers, Inc.'s (RSI)-

7 facilities of Westerville, Ohio, and Decatur, Georgia. DOE indicated that j

December 1,1988 would be the earliest it could accept sources at WESF for fj long-term storage. NRC representatives stated their belief that sources Q

should be removed freni RSI's facilities more rapidly than indicated by Yd DOE's schedule.

$i 0W B,

l 1

I u

b',' > $ _ b $'

  • A
  • 4 J

j

  • 19K'.*

p y

n ~

v-.

2

' L. V

'L-'-

,.c.,Lr a n ~ w 2x ke=ra : m..-, ':,,m.,r.w...R. s.:s O. M::KN!.M h. ~.T.4;. P : !N-lr i..

1I'

.F '

f

+.

[. '

3-4 y'),.

k a

Mx e-1 g'

%{

RepresentativesofbothagenciesagreedthatRSI(Westerville)sourcesshould' 7) be moved first because of RSI's desire to resume irradiation services at

[

Westerville using Co-60. Both also agreed that the Westerville sources O

must be examined (e.g., visually; ultrasound testing) before they are shipped to Wi DOE in order to provide reasonable assurance that the sources continue to ff meet 'kpecial form" requirements. DOE representatives stated that the examinations D

cannot be done while Co-60 sources are in the Westerville pool. NRC-

..u representatives then stated that RSI (Westerville) would not be authorized f

to receive Co-60 sources until each source has been examined, and at least

(

25% of the Cs-137 sources have been removed and sent to 00E.

DOE agreed that it could take possession of 36-44 sources at WESF/Hanford if

[j the sources remain in their shipping casks until the WESF facility is

[jf fully staffed and capable of unloading the casks and placing the Cs-137 3

sources in their long-tenn storage locations. This solution is dependent f

on extended use of_RSI's 9 RSI-1500 casks that hold 4 sources each and the 4

2 GE-600 casks located elsewhere in the United States.

3 il)

DOE representatives promised to arrange a visit by appropriate' staff to RSI (Westerville) ouring the week of August 28, 1988 to examine the

)i facility and detennine if and how DOE's source examination eouipment can il be accomodated. They expected to begin the examinations during the week' a

'?-

of September 5, 1988 and believe it would take 2-21 weeks to complete the i

examinations.. At that point, depending on the number of casks available, a

i 36-44 Cs-137 sources could be removed and shipped to Hanford and y

off-loaded when the WESF facility is ready.. This schedule assumes no j

unforseen problems develcp during this time period.

2 t,- y

'~,J-_}

~

9 v. ?

,,.1?",

2 c

. w.a w...

.w.

n:,.~.:... :,, -

..- ~ +

a., z m.m.a pan..n.. m ~.,.

w

/ @f l 7

s i,

.i (l %

de JL m

f f

3

> 1, LA %. ws t e c,\\ < w,, n tow. w.a.

'2 nw-st 9@h TO$ = Df f(a ll") M'll -012 /

f$&b '

?

\\%

l tx k

l &

$neuga)

Qn6-//G b60/)M3-3tSL 263-394,

! th Bw w u-e t tsoo m-w e.

un-w >

i lTm $kg}<A 0 0 E.- tiB bod 3s'3-596Lt

[2'n.54d EECm,,,J~

N/?cwAr.1s so/ vu.rv.1 c gra.s,ag if n

v A. 0. YQ $4 A

/l

~AlNS N/-Y9d N /$~

$W{,

4 b,.

! Jh 'Tiid.wu kamust kom M.sn -s7s,r (Welt 4

i Lrasac // b/1.,

-tr>A -nm z -

e.ss-s7io e

f h Tow /V As no a

e/Mers 9'9 2 -G 4s C i1.A hfu14 trd/6M-32.

'Frh 233 -eu 3

.! d u e Ce,e,/

m,iew.re e r r -a o c.

kb qlAlkL1 $1A M j J bt DO E lW

$$] -42/Y 212-421L jE TL esuM U /pE w-3 n ~Dd/ kn@2 w

~

(

U R AJJ q

1., -

.g 9

(

y ai]r E.

i

)

?

)

l*I l

i h,$

I u

{'

I

^

  • 7 9,

,e sy

-a-

.eg.

p j

. - n. x. - - -, n--,,-~

-,-w

.+.

f

~

..o u

a s

C f

i' 4

ACTION PLAN t

c c

FOR i

[

i RETURN OF CESIUM CAPSULES

.y ci

~ :

\\

.i t

/

T DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - HEADQUARTERS i

e s..,.

AUGUST 24,1988 l

f f

..b

-c 6

(d b

lY

)

i.

w..

+e_~,,-

amy, m

-m-..,,,,eaam,,--

' = = -

-,u..

-u,a-,-.a.-

M14 ?4 %?, ni, )2 *G."*. 9427 N'.2. 'J d !..

V' ' ?' 1 'a, i f s *. i,,; s ' e s.. s - 4 t.Yiala.. J.J.' t eiran ? 9 74 3 '1 ? ~.4 44 7'.'

-M ' C T,'*Ud.M4a F.

f.

2' ti:~

f.4 -

Jk *:

3;

. e..

-e

't'.

I

\\;' '

wf('e 4

e-4.

n

,.1

._4.

r.

-9' 5

m h

}l

(

i, 5

e g

+1 -

O i

N-l

,*3

="

61 -

E g

N.=

<l t -

g I

Ll -

w h.

J O

M 1:

3 H

4 m

as F

M-O 3

4-

- W W

i.

E LA J

i t'i 3

W M

88 N

et m 'g. S

a. -

4 a

M eq e-w W

N 2GM y

a

!1 OmW g

6

!?

M u

4

't-p g

9 u

O o

4-et O

E H

lt.

m 3

E O

N.

m W

m m

W N

E H

M

-M O.

M i

p D

M O

'.6 m

og O

H u

-i e

O W

L.' -

6 g

C

,J W-W J

H

?!

E E

M 4

M 6

O O

et En E

W Lt M

M W

M m

r H

H

>=

E H

M

?,i :

E u

W u

m m

O 4

M M

W M

(

x.-

L o

o o

o o

o a:

l..

.ef) '

7,f -

r; '

i.

h4 4

,4 f-t

,5

,)E

.O.

_g

  • E 4
y y

y

'3

?

x. ~:m;na:urawm:. :::r.mwww.cneammi.z.wwmmwimmmex;ungo mn

.e o,

1 Le 23

..j; 7

ij Y

];

' ' ~

[

^

1 HANFORD OPTIONS'FOR RETURN OF CESIUM CAPSULES s

-1

. ~,

OBJECTIVE:

EXPEDITIOUS CAPSULE RETURN FROM COMERCIAL USERS 0;

I a*

?

1.:

o WESF IS THE BEST HANFORD OPTION.FOR EXPEDITIOUS CAPSULE RETURN

. +

~

DESIGNED FOR STORAGE 0F FULL COMPLIMENT OF CAPSULES-r; A

U EQUIPPED TO HANDLE RSI-1500 CASKS WESF IS NOW IN A STANDBY CONDITION h '/S o

SURVEILLANCE CREW SIZE INSUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT SHIPPING PROGRAM 3

-u NEED TO REINSTALL EQUIPMENT TO SUPPORT HANDLING

+

U 1

P.

3 S

t E

. =

b

.5 F-$

ig h.

i.

a t.=mmm.;..w: w.u. m = u a w a : n m u.: u c. +,. n w w w., m e w w. a w.,,m w.e. x. x x.=

x x n;;.+

u't.

' 1; u.e 4

,n f.' :

.t a

1 1

L 3

s a

u

[. i o

s.,

s i

OPTIONS FOR RETURN

-(CONTINUED) c Q:

t

T!

+

.g

!2 4,

+

q}

i-0 CAPSULES HAVE NEVER BEEN RETURNED TO WESF FOR STORAGE E

4

,e i

o OPTIONS FOR EARLY RECEIPT OF CAPSULES E

j.?

y l-L LOAD AND STORE DRY IN SNIPPING CASKS G

a e'

1

s

,4 l*-

STORE DRY-IN WESF HOT CELLS u

COMBINATION-0F THE ABOVE y

l e

.Y a

2 o

ri*

25

,.,1.

x

=e y.-

O 4i i?

A N

7 b,x

+

v N

~h r

  • a 3

c R

d'

- s, N

e 1 "i i,i p

.'3 4

m n

~p 7

a v ++

,q s,,-

. we

,~

s.

pw.,. - x y. " ::m

x. ',,

ai:z u:, v.:.:2;:Sgw; v4. " gw;.;,:,;.y.sy;;.;x.sp.;;:nn;;q $;;.yy;gp,:.g.q.2 q9,~

j..

y s

.y

,..a

{

l 4

4 M

M J

4 M

J v'

' M 4

WJE r

i,i O

U UWO

[//

OO

%UM l.

M MO O

M M.

MM C

WWMA p-I e-t h

J

>Q E,

M i I

3WWW 4

M MW W

at as eg E

AC W W

4 M

[;

O h eg D

@i U

^^

^

W40 S

mN N

ed M W y

vv-v 90 ch. v et 7' b 'l

'4S l a '4 h

l0 O

A W

4 D

W.-

E L'!i M

O M

?x U

W tl v

J 31 D

W C0 N.

(

M W

N M

a E

CL, l.'

QC 4

9-U M

M eg l.4 -

i E

s O

a, w. FC m M- .E Fi' O Q M G-y Eh Ch. W t k,. 'O & @W l'1 m M

-:j q

.J k E O J E O . W WM WW M G WW k H M n O Ou OO Om WM WE WM M4 MM M U E w 3; >M y-og E cd og og W ..i :- QM ~QH CD 3 u F. 4 Q C O O x z + Eg f r It a .,.,'

  • ph. ( i,,[,.-
  • * ' * ~..'1*'3.'.'"*

P..f.4.., -, * '.,,, i p ; { r, j.,,s,*- , *, gg,. r 4 .. p r;,, ._g, e ,_s_ g.

y ;p *iw. :1::,w ':zpi: C. '.w ; F,;;.t;p'u u2477.O v7 3 7.;7a':fr;QG.; LVKin J :'itay;Mjk" 7;;r :C,%;.. '.V 1 s;;a'nl I i '[ A 't f I ^ .fr Y t 4 i% w

Jf M

m ft,.' ,i 3 e. "'ei W s:- 4 J i M = { i d s M E M a W a g-g W 7 e g E a 5 M W E N. 5 O O .1, p a M E E M O 1-LN m 4 M M G m W H 3-g W M W 4 g: q M 3 M E W M M M O as W O E E l; E U N O O [: O N. W 4 H E M m M M M >= U A p !? 5 O E k 35 8 s i-O W M M L M E \\ r. - e W-E 4: M M w M M M a u W 4 N - 9 4 etl 3 O W W E 2$ M O. 6 b 4 M -5: g W W W M M y

i
M M

y A-O J W J 6 v M E J ' D U M 4 O M 11-O 4 4-e M 3 iu. 5 = = = = i:' O 6 E W E M M W 4 M O U M i M W M W W W M E A I"". E-W O O O O O O 1 O g M c. 1:.1 l-M i y a M q

i. ".

- W ) L 3 W b M F) A 'i/ r

  • w N

4 3. d' ' 4 ' t 4 * ' N.i'

  1. /

+ g j f 4 #, ) ( p

  • i F
  • w e

,.m e g -g, g g g p ,c g

m..euimem:w:w.:wawmmwanummma:mommwwmma n.w. m y 3 e a x v

5 y

~w I + C?

t d

ENCAPSULATION FACILITY s p. si L

3

~n ?A AOUEOUSEsaREUP OrtnafueG C6 WW Asap CostamCat STOmaOE Gattent - g ..n y __ \\ - M

  • u..,.y
se i

'~ c. 3 ?. g p f$ ]N* Y -:..,. :. L .5-- 4g 80 00 t / .. T_ f M1 )I ~ TR AN%MsTTE R F ~ *1f ^ C- ,4 ' el da '~

  1. d nOOes

'Oee h f'**~

  • ,.4

,y a.

  1. e ',, ps.ks.

'"p-- Q 2% ,.s W ANePUt a TOR ~ N I.s ,Oe A g ), pe rONTausNavnON g ~ g, c. Cfi1 -a* '; b WASTE stae80ts**G g ..e TRUCW Pom? Cent e-STROceTsues 9ItImaisOst N E, m -P. Citt T STROesTsues CordpaCTessG CAPSULE i ,;g .':.a aseO CaPStAf WELO STOmaGE CitL ~O' 1 .it CEssues acWeCafsoes ( .}' D, AND CAPSULE wttO Casst Pe7 6a Citt'E' T' 4 4] CE$ sues Tet1 POUR 's R. $/ Cfit T P9PE CAPSUtt OfCOseTanseseaftoes .e 3 f . % geceseCo, S p' Cfit Ts* I Ft SECOsse f seCAPSUt a78000 [ ULTRASOoseC TESTiseG i j; ~ C :. y TanNSeen arste a+ y .C.PSute ?i STOmAGE POOL s-ia ".f r. 2 y ?.a ( -*'i. 7. g? Y. ,s d m . w T' -P

q%i.w.a c::.:# u sa vacM;;.rx :.c..a e,. a nxo....v., +:.m i <.x:.:.%.*t.';.% % ~;. >. 2,Wi:Mr.,s w' z % N;. s;.-- i ?. - l 1.1)l a: fj a D.. 1$ II - y :.. 1, ! " 'e t 4 ' 1's-

) '

t _,. c.4 ?b ( 2 w l1 Y. '[ 4 * (. ..). Q' W W L.. bm y w w b w y,e g w N v s w c1 m E w w 3 w J O O J m a = W W 1 E m i.1 O 5 'E J m ^ M-M y >4 W 4 4 ?j k g U M l. y m U U ir' E w m Lfe m g M s W k m g m J 4 4 8 = w t E N-W J 4 (JB 3 bd 3 O U. E 8 s ~ os A .E 4 5 5 W W L? W E w a a w ?. U U 0-l w m j E N S-O W 'M W 3 E J. .3 m w w = Y Y w O >m 4U 3,. O E R (s O O O O i. r.. i- -. m 1 [e ($ IY, li j pj. 1e 1 L1 i \\ l l.h 1 u.., %%l F D s l ':*? l T f":' 4 ? ">:: ' ' ', ' ]l. : ' ' e,L c ". ;. ' y;;lly :(,9 :

"~ ~

~

,. :,. u, a u1smes,auu :mu.v.am:e.1.:.:amt.a,za:sm:5L-es%mw:uw;w;e. ::ai51m:i& n.ypFi5:-n-wcut: - t k ] 1? 11 ..p t

t SCHEDULE:

RETURN OF CESIUM CAPSULES ' H: .Jia$ FY 88 FY 89 m 1 TASK J 'J A S O N D J~ F M .A M J J A S y ' b ?j 3 O Q +' INSPECTIONS AT RSI - DECATUR M v s l N Ij -)c CAPSULE EXAMINATIONS AT ORNL m if L.c V i DECISION ON w hRETURN OF y RSI CAPSULES .f 1 L.? l:* L; OPTIONS FOR RETURN TO WESF la e l l. x ~E i v {! ~ PREPARE WESF FOR RECEIPT DECISION ON 3 r RETURN OF REMAINING COMMERCIAL CAPSULES i m I WESTERVILLE DECATUR 0. l \\; l-I l; RECEIVE & STORE RSI SPECIAL FORM _ CAPSULES AT WESF t. i id RECEIVE & STORE RSI SUSPECT CAPSULES - g AT WESF .e .1 (- ~ 'g8 I.. SHIP & RECENE REMAINING E- ,'i COMMERCIAL CAPSULES i.. 8/21/88 9 b h il ,3 \\

E745 @s':54 M' I gy* h' fi ->?oh k !:i!r.? c'.pl s, ~ z-3 ~ m s a W w 1 / o n I 2 e 1 oee m 5 v 2 i I/ I 1 U gY" 'i 1 U 7 m S ?I 58 g I I I I I g l l l I I g I I l 'I s I/ 1 g 1 C E 0 L u U 1 IY tS S9 I E I/ I I l I I l g ' TTH 1 R SST P 1 YEi A O STw C T 3 ceN fm S / DO C , 3 I g I 1 8I 1 BT X E E* AA C T RC A S U C ME 9I ' O H 7 T C. S> ?' 1 I l l I ' F 2 l E I/ f ER R m TU EM V 0 RR P** O e SD OE O U OT A YE 1 TC A. F SC L Q G W C 0 A t E NI M 0 E 2 7 U ^" O A I/ E0 C F Etl W t IP R 0 P 8 lN RP O 1 OM H P S A R A P P A O 3 eM E T T 1 RS P R 9' Q yg E A I/ UL PT 0 FL m O" R EA F 1. RT R A S S S F C Q Co E a yINC p "i m.I E l W I/ P"T o t Y (S A e E" i E !' t T ER t E t ET E E MS C , "P w f M s2 H T N SU c m o I S P / E 9 UT e S 8F i t A R AT E v I P 2 T S E MD 2 SS H" i g I I l e A R Pt ./ E I EP U S E II s C R gU P R n Q m 5 .P gfys 1 , I l I l 3 l u I/ DGD D e EINDE E IOH H F s ENS DUU C I/ S s FB g A K T SDS ANE m TA C l/ s u. m m. a a w p ( n 3.:m i :: A r ( h f ?;> y. <~,;- :,' N O.. < - " * '. 5.' P! I c ; ;' ' [a$[m~ h.( i

-g a. a.. : w, x m m m w w =.c.- m w.u w s. w. r a. m a..a s u u m :,:x m a x u w w w w. ; u c. m. a m .F -; i G Ii }

  • 4s f

2 :s s. L; S s y M 1 k .. 4 a t-1 '? ~1 COST ESTIMATE 1 .g .4: s s ',d l' FY 1988 FY 1989 j H l :. TASK ($000) ($000) 1 ds 1. FIELD FACILITY OPERATIONS 1,270 3,520 - j t. 2, 2. WESF OPERATIONS 100 2,240 t. l( 3. TECHNICAL SUPPORT 415 880 i ~ ., ~ t TOTALS 1,785 6,640 a' 5 h cb b C :. T ?- / bT 1*, s. l1 ? -O F; h i. t e 4 ~- - w-0 ^'m-

  • -- -w

= r.

9 w..~..n i <.nweces:smamwnn.wa=a.wnwa. uwwa:mmuamm;uicx,mm.ynua:ar;sm .~s q;. . 5 c 3 ? ll y g g .} f -) ? 5' WORK SCOPE ASSUMPTIONS FOR COST ESTIMATE j p 4 o ONLY CESIUM CAPSULES FROM THE TWO RSI FACILITIES ARE CONSIDERED s W. f. o CAPSULES AT RSI-WESTERVILLE, OHIO WILL BE RETURNED FIRST h p k o CAPSULES WILL BE RETURNED TO HANFORD'S WESF ii r l o CAPSULES IDENTIFIED AT.RSI-DECATUR, GEORGIA AS " SUSPECT" WILL BE: d i e-SHIPPED AS NRC NORMAL FORM MATERIAL L P SHIPPED IN GE-600 CASK IN AN NRC APPROVED OVERPACK ? bc J o REMAINING NON-SUSPECT CAPSULES AT DECATUR AND WESTERVILLE WILL BE: y L: SHIPPED AS NRC SPECIAL FORM MATERIAL D s L: SHIPPED IN RSI-1500 CASKS WITH 4 CAPSULES'PER CASK 4 e TRANSPORTED TO WESF AT THE AVERAGE RATE OF ONE CASK PER DAY

4 ii

{b 7 i e Q 2 b ^ h. p: v. c-v - m e-

p.,:caww.wmqa.wxex m.sa.waawmmawawuxmxas:;ua:aw::wwenmwsaw.i.maxwam;m it

~ 4 m , a e 1 o i( e c i v b ta ,s .q s J ISSUES 1 l u i 3 u le

  1. 1 b

o DECISION ON RETURN OF RSI CAPSULES Y o. K z. g 3 l? o DEFINITION OF RESPONSIBILITIES FOR CAPSULE RETURN PROGRAM -b m sp.

a

\\ ? d o FUNDING FOR FY 1989 P, =, b p g; o DECISION ON OTHER COMERCIAL USERS Pz 4 r, o SCREENING INSPECTION, DECONTAMINATION PRIOR TO SNIPMENT -li 1 ~ s 5 9 { i.b .n. ?. '1 E p q I. =

  1. +-.

4- ~e

unxw.wwn +:;u.m m.. av,ww..r.aw...n a a.m ww wyr- .mnum:mewam lE y q

.2.
s3:...::

I if, Y-MV (., f Radiological Health Section f m e. Ladmeter.ph.D./Comi s sioner 0FFICE OF RECULATORY SERVICES + ROOM 800 870 PEACHTREE ST5 ET, N.E. / AftANTA, CEORCIA 30309 n'b .i I: August 4, 1988 b.I a C Allan Chin, President i k Radiation Sterilis T 2300 Mellon Court p Decatur, Georgia 30035 D 0 Dear Mr. Chins aN O-On March 9, 1984, you applied to the Georgia Department of Human Resources l fj - for a license to receive, possess and use radioactive material in a y radiation steriliser facility to be located at 2300 Mellon Court, Decatur, i1 - Georgia. In response to your application, Radiation Sterilisers, Inc., s (RSI) was issued Georgia Radioactive Material License GA 864-1. Amendment f). . 02 to license GA 868-1, dated February 8, 1985, authorised the use of a li Cobalt 60 (Co-60) sources for sterilisation of primarily medical products. 4 9 By letter dated October 30, 1985, you requested a license amendment to j authorise the use of Cesium 137 (Ca-137) WESF sources at your Dacatur, i 1 Georgia plant. License amendment.07 to radioactive material license .CA 868-1, dated January 6, 1986, authorised RSI to use the Cs-137 WESF [ -sources.- g on June 6, 1988, RSI notified the Department that the cell safety system e i locked due to a high radiation level = detected by the in-cell detector. It was subsequently determined that one or more Ca-137 sources were leaking, ? thereby causing a necessity for clean-up and decontamination of the f Decatur, Georgia facility. G You signed and agreed to a Department of Energy Management Plan For a D Radiation Sterilisers, Inc. Recovery Activities on June 20, 1988. The j Management Plan included a provision-designating RSI with responsibility for contracting for health physics support and control during the recovery ? cf-your facility. Pursuant to the Plan, RSI contracted with Chen Nuclear R. Systems, Inc. (CNSI) for these services. m] In a letter to Mr. Lester Price, Director of-Energy Programs' Division, f, U.S. Department of-Energy, dated July 13, 1988 you threatened to terminate f; the contract with CNSI. Also, in a letter to CNSI dated August 2, 1988, you stated that you could not pay CNSI's bill for services. [ If the contract with CNSI is terminated such that health physics control y and support at the facility are no longer available and recovery activities Q are discontinued, the Department believes that conditions at the facility 3 may deteriorate, resulting in a potential hazard to public health and [ L: L *,. l b z AN touse n**narvuorv wotnven '*v,,,G3 j-4 m. e, ,fy .py y., g,j a=

nr.g. n., - c. n. .erm~mm w m.w x c,=

n.m..
:w. x

.a.:, u..

:m,.m;.a.x.n;.

Q I ' ': il2: ; -Ei-!? i; ?.t.; .;-I'c.3= J 'i ~4 5. 1,.. 'Page 2 0 -- Allan Chin, President Q. August 4.'1988 b 290-5-23.03 of the Georgia Rules and l3 _ safety.in violation of Chapter Regulations for Radioactive Materials. In the event of termination of your l!i contract with CNSI, certain short term actions would have to be initiated il isusediately and maintained at the site until decontamination and clean up 4 activities are reinstituted at the facility. These include: ( f 1. Control access to Zone 3 to prevent the spread of contamination from Zone 3. Spread of radioactive contamination from Zone 3 could adversely affect the environment and any continued operation.at the RSI facility. j;- The duration and expense of the recovery of the facility would be g t increased. W 3' 2. Continue to perform radiation surveys of persons leaving the area 3 of Zone 3. This action would determine the presence or absence of Q contamination of personnel leaving sone 3 so that recontamination of g other parts of the facility and the outside environment would be less 3;j likely to occur. If.this action were not done, the cost and duration j of continued-recovery activities would possibly increase. R c A 3. Maintain chiller operation to prevent an escalation of pool water v 2. temperature. An increase in pool water temperature may accelerate the d leakage rate from the leaking source or sources stored in the pool. j This in turn may lead to contamination of outside areas and make the decontamination and recovery of the facility more expensive, sore difficult, and more time consuming. t 4. Monitor, on a daily basis, the concentration of Cs-137 in the gource storage pool. Should the concentration of Cs-137 increase, the potential 0, for an adverse impact on the environs exists. Also, the task of packaging of the suspect source (s) for transport to 008 becomes more complicated due q to the extra action necessary to assure that the shipping cask is Q decontaminated. The ability to work in the cell preparing the shipment 9 may be jeopardized if the radiation level increases excessively.. The V duration and expense of the recovery of the facility would be increased, s 4. 5. Continue operation of the cell air monitor and measurement of filter 4 samples to check the cell for possible airborne Cs-137 and to monitor for i any additional spread of radioactive contamination. T 6. Continue maintenance of conditions in Zone 1 according to the terms of the re-entry permit issued on July 21, 1988. Failure to do so may result 1 j; in loss of the permit and imposition of civil penalties. 5 7. Notify the Department iszediately of any indication of adverse change y noted as a result of actions 1. through 6. above. 3?' Please notify me in writing within 24 hours of your receipt of this letter as to whether the CNSI contract will be terminated and, if so, of your g. n o 4, ' E -sy.,N-(,, y. ,_f_+ u 3. .yy . q.7,, t , e, i m s

g.2. mvaww. nam.u au;wr.r. i.imi.c was:x s C +,zca.w wmmx.u x;.n:;...:ncn 1.\\ }

c...

r d wioi r e crict es so<eo v me m - 93e woes ($ s N e y 'Page 3 Allan Chin, President .y M August 4, 1988 kb intended course of action to ensure that the short-term requirements 's set forth h'erein are met. Failure to assure the Department that these ? requirements will be est in a competent manner will be. construed as 21 unwillingness or inability on your part to protect thorpublic health 0: and safety from the uncontrolled release of radioactive asterial. i Should radioactive contasiination be spread as a result of your failure to i ensure the proper implementation of the above actions, the Department will jj take appropriate measures to protect the public health and safety. Such -measures may include the revocation of the July 22, 1988 reentry permit, j, ' the issuance of an emergency order, and the imposition of civil penalties. 3. Furthermore, your present operating practices will be considered by the Department, pursuant to Rule 290-5-23.02(8), upon any licensure request ] 9' in the future. 10y On a longer tera basis, the need exists to continue the short-term plans 'i outlined above~and to continue decontamination and recovery of the 1 O facility as indicated in the DOE management plan dated June 20, 1988. I i y The Department expects the decontamination of the facility and equipment to proceed in a timely manner. Decontamination activities, contamination p: control, chiller maintenance, and pool and air concentration monitoring are $j. to be performed under strict health physics control by qualified personnel. s Any delay in recovery of the facility is not acceptable to the Department, f as delay imposes added risk to the public health and safety and constitutes I 3 a drain on state resources. w . s If you would like to discuss this matter further, please do not hesitate to j contact es. ll c Sincerely, H 1 n! Thomas E. Hill Acting Director g ( Radiological Health Section 3 M p, cci Martin J. Rotter 3-James L. Setser Li! Lester Price i Richard L. Woodruff 3 Rose H. Nathan v TEHidp a II

  • l cj i.

b) 8 \\.b E 1 ,}}