ML20033F473

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses DOE Request for Proposal for Mobile Demo Irradiator to Be Designed to Contain Waste Encapsulation & Storage Facility Capsules.G Dietz Suggestion That Author & J Ayer Visit Spartenburg,Sc Facility Noted.W/Related Info
ML20033F473
Person / Time
Issue date: 04/16/1984
From: Singer B
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
Shared Package
ML20033D963 List:
References
FOIA-90-29 NUDOCS 9003210180
Download: ML20033F473 (2)


Text

g w.,... w n w w r. m w

...,:.a. m m =....: x.. w.w w : y c:.u. av

.a,

.~.+.r.

4, o

3L

/[""%

y UNITED STATES

?T t

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMisslON hI~

h i,f WASHINGTON. D. C. 20666 f;

(+...*,/

o 4

APR 161984 hf Note to FUe

?.

1 CESIUM CHLORIDE i

d.

George Dietz received RFP from DOE for a mobile demo irradiator which will be j'

designed to contain 1-4 mci /CoC1 (WESF capsules).

The demo unit will not be d;

a production plant.

For example, it will be able to irradiate only one box of apples at a time.

p)

[y.

George Dietz stated that he was the project officer at the AEC for the mobile irradiator in the early 1960's.

It was intended that the unit use CsC1.

The j

p AEC was promoting the irradiation of such commodities as fish, grain and fruits.

J.

A pilot plant was constructed. This mobile unit wei "First time they put it on the road it sank to its a#ghqd more than 60 tons, t

b in asphalt." The j

project was allowed to die quietly.

1 Q

Dietz cautioned that the scale-up from a demo plant.to a full size production unit may be quite complex.

He states a concern for the wide scale use of 3

CsC1.

He believes that the first ' failure will cast a " big black eye" on the 79 i ndus try.

He gives this opinion as 'a gut feeling' only.

.u M1 He asked me if it made sense for him to bid on the RFP.

I told him that I

!if had no opinion to express at this time, that the NRC has not seen the RFP I

fj he referred to, and that we had just sent a letter to DOE which essentially

,7 agreed to a proof of principle demonstration.

A.

I George suggests that Jim Ayer and I visit their Sp/tanburg, South Carolina f

plant.

It is a 4 MC1/Co-60 unit with all the up-to-date safety devices i

built in.

I thanked George for the offer and ad'v'ised him that we would f

plan to make such a visit within the next 4-6 weeks.

/

2 4X

/

.A.-+

1 n rd Si er, Ch e g-M t' r er fic tion and

?,j -

rocedu s Branch cc:

-J. Ayer

.J. Klucsik y m y,rws up e' caa cna US.

j So APoc heco A M.

9,lo,It / M' GPnnYnAGRG eE*C' v

[oc M T'C> Ed C.

,,g 9003210100 900312 h

PDR FDIA

-GILDERT90-29 PDR' L q.; -

. n.: : ys x 3.:.;

.q.-

w.7 1v: m s.. ;

,2 a

e

,,..: -........ -a

~... c. s..s

.. :. i w a. ~ A. o.

..r.

,.:.,-..~........

ii,

4 k

" Cesium Activity for frradiators" i

Sth, Floor Conference Room February 22, 1984 1

( _t.

<s

.c, -

"j..

Name Organi za tion-t 9

i h GMN C.

Y*

hk opg

/

G. R. iN ED

  1. e* * '

yQ G(

Yl$t C'

{

g ( tm W s't-fl F lA3

.!()-

tg t\\

h gQ...kWCYhO m

3-

!)

To m Clar It U5 !J NC ' NM: 5 ~ FC A F u

l

    • O
i M

6, q a

w a n c.-

f

$1,e4 a e-f ~/ JCM?

-s

-9 m

l#

l' e.

f D'.

~.1 -

D 2

tN~

r-

,j C UVM'?

g 8.44

~

\\g t

) -

4 i.

  • d.

d

^ l\\.

3 a

E

-g k4.+

L,

~ $ ;'

I 8

w

/ ~ # [* k;,#.;. [;

I,"

? / * ' M ' ' O ' ' t ~~

'"?**

1 I,'","

[}

] {* *; 1 '

  • f", ' j,T. g' ) < './^.,, ' '

,3

,,7

,"'7-

" 7 ] Ne, sy.

4 t

y i