ML20027E217
| ML20027E217 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000, San Onofre |
| Issue date: | 05/04/1977 |
| From: | Book H, North H NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20027A625 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-82-394 PNO-770504-01, PNO-770504-1, NUDOCS 8211120267 | |
| Download: ML20027E217 (2) | |
Text
"
(MC Pro- 'dures 907128 and 92700B)
IdNTIFICATION inme (Facility or Licensee): N>4 > 6A./trr~f6 /
Docket No. :
'D -N L License No. : JV'/'-/3 Event Date: 6/2h f
//.' 7o /4 Event, Description; t th<dtif UP.TK (,4//IC ~ /D) /Mik Ocs.:;t:1:xuak; CC, a 'c
/
t /At//6f(W f/cM&c, h s*A6X2 ')
Notification Date: Sh/77 T.me:
// S4 />7 Method: m r//' *E-Avr Notified By: (2/6?r7/x/m' Hotification Received By: //,,Ufm Regulation Requiring the Report
/m/ /%, reg /3)(3,)
PRELIMINARY RESPONSE 1.
Incident Severity Level per MC 1300:
I
, II
, III
, Other X 2.
Immediate Site Insp/ Invest Required:
X/o Report No.:
3.
Immediate Notifications:
Individual Date & Time Notified NRC:HQ State Radiological Team Other J4'/ 2Zr 4.
Press Release:
Issued by NRC (Date) A c Issued by Licensee (Date) 4/c
/
SCREEHING 1.
Have reporting requirements been. met?
4[lv 2.
If an LER. was the' initial report, is the' form complete and-do the responsei appear to be appropriate?_
3.
Is the description adequate to assess the event?
4.
Have corrective actions been identified? /4
'/44Mus 5.
Do proposed corrective actions appear appropriate?
V&
6.
Is enforcement action by IE appropriate?
A 'e 7.
Should the event be classified as an Abnormal Occurrence?
//o If so, has the Regional Coordinator been notified by telep/S</ A hong?. =
n 8.
Is a written report due from Licensee? VL If so, when?
"t w.~<
EVALUATION 1.
Date written report received?
J-2M/7 3 d')
2.
Has the cause been identified?
% '- /% a<- <-< - u.u 3.
If not, has an investigation program been identified? A 7.- x % d 4.
Have the safety implications been identified? 2>/JW' 5.
Has the generic applicability within the facility been considered? JM#
6.
Do generic aspects warrant IE action?
A s-7.
Do the facts warrant other actions by,the licensee? A/o 8.
Evaluation assistance requested:, /Vo No.
9.
Recommended followup actions: i L/<4/u 444ru6 [ed.46V R E/'/ Je/6 REFERENCES he c-< de s
,5g Q
/ '"' ' '
N" V
g g, Q -l (c>.a op"4 %
/
CLOSURE Resolution of IE concerns identified above:
Completed By:
' 'S Date:
4/ ~' 7 Reviewed By:
'if,f-M.g__
Date: 5,/,d,/7. 7 IE:V Form 601 8211120267 820928
~
v/v L ' 3 7-PDR FOIA R APKINO2-394 PDR
r m
).
b 9Gl 1.',*.!E h* r.7 3 T : E *; t _S-3 7 7
.SN t.1it -
/.', T, r., Y. s.
/
. l.r.
,,c..r C a
.o J. :..
1 f..,...,.
... r s.s...,
~.......
s.. -
- 1...ev.
....6
.. 3.,.,. n..,, l,,*).
n..
.. ~..
~ 4,s,,,s 1
.o o,
.r.. s.... :
4 ) a 4.r.,.e. : I 41 r
...s
/....._.............:
l. t...,, s..
.., e..ti i
F r E:~7 T'J EL C /, FM N t 'M "-E F _ //A C,- / O
__r E t i r '.*E t F-M
('..t..* e* t* ?* A 1
.t 1. E C ay *:.9.C C,..f. p,,. g, o o-. 6.vg1.-c
,a..
o..
v.
. v is.e 3..*.T r.4.t e
! *.. g.. - l.c v.=
....u
^
2 c.>
. 5 7-77 ( I;AT E) A7. // '/'
(TIME) s.r THE 70LLm 1NG F M r / J A i::. r CONTM'.3 ??AT A CN PEADI NG S GI'EA7ER TH/N 2 7, 0 0 D DPM/10 (. CM /..
' OC;."1 1 ON C DN7 /$P. 3 N/,T DN-DPM I[*P/C
,I
't<5 ol C 4.'> L c *c.L j:].<.%
bT^fh' 2_ D_.---
y c. r s') */~~
j>
~
_s
.y,....
r 3.) :.
. _. _.s.
... t
/r;
.$ */c< /6*-
t
.,. -..... J,... ;, -];r s
/ __et f*
- p
.......,....),,
...i....-
e
- 5. f..
r,....
.......i..,.......
. u..... : c.-).
r.,..,,.
c.,.,..
.r r n..-
a
.n:..,.
a.
/,o
- ~
&"J,.:. u c.1)_
. '- _/J!.E-
'~
f l ' &.*.N ~. **..-
e e
6